Original PR description

Discuss sidebar items are too catchy, which is distracting when the core part of Discuss app is the conversation itself. As much as possible, conversation should be very visible while other elements are slightly less visible.

This problem is even more pronunced when the sidebar is compact, because the avatars in sidebar are next to avatars of conversation, which is even more distracting.

This commit fixes the issue by reducing opacity slightly on non-active sidebar items. Conversation that are unread and unactive have an in-between opacity so they are more visible than other read and non-active conversations but still have reduced opacity so that this is less distracting than the conversation itself.

Backport of https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/190071

Original PR description

When the selection contains formatted nodes among unformatted nodes, the remove format toolbar button should be available.

This is not the case currently because the `hasAnyFormat` method, which is used to determine whether the button should be disabled, checks if **every** node in the selection is formatted.

This commit fixes the issue by checking if **any** node in the selection is formatted instead.

task-4385246

Original PR description

In the payment view, he `x2many_buttons` widget on `duplicate_payment_ids`
calls the `action_open_business_doc`, but this method is not implemented
on `account.payment`. This was not not a problem before 01b87f1230beac0568f4e3b1b76e547909506892
since a payment was always linked to a move, therefore we were calling
the method from `account.move`.

With this commit, we implement the `action_open_business_doc` in
`account.payment`.

Step:

- Create a payment and confirm
- Duplicate it
- Click on the 'Same payment' hyperlink
-> Error: "The method 'action_open_business_doc' does not exist on the
   model 'account.payment'"

opw-4363907

Original PR description

Since there are two mechanism that changes the status of a contract (a cron and the write of a date), we have to override 2 different places when we want to add a behavior on closing or opening of contracts.

As there are already functions (action_expire, ...) that exist and are use in the write part, we also use them in the cron, so we'll have only one place where we need to override it.


---
I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr

Original PR description

Steps to reproduce the traceback:
- preview a file from the kanban view
- close the preview
- switch to list view
- open a folder

To Be:
The folder should open correctly.

Technical:
The traceback happens because the 'getSelectedDocumentsElements' calls a querySelectorAll on the component root element without checking if it exists.
Fixing the issue by making sure the component effectively have a root element before calling the method.

Task-4373626