**Issue**
When importing an XML invoice of document type TD01, it is incorrectly assigned type TD05 after processing.

**Steps to Reproduce**
1. Install Accounting, l10n_it and l10n_it_edi
2. Go to Accounting > Vendors > Vendor Bills
3. Upload an XML invoice with TD01 as the document type
4. Upon confirming the bill, observe that the document type is incorrectly set to TD05

**Root Cause**
The document type matching logic fails to assign TD01 because the uploaded invoice has move_type = in_invoice, while TD01 was only configured to match out_invoice. https://github.com/odoo-dev/odoo/blob/7436e8cee2f605c6d5d559cb410e7a3dc8f372b9/addons/l10n_it_edi/models/account_move.py#L886-L891

**Fix**
According to Italian e-invoicing specifications, TD01 applies to both sales and purchase invoices ("Fatture di vendita" and "Fatture d’acquisto"). To reflect this, in_invoice is now added to the list of supported move_types for TD01, allowing correct detection during XML import.

opw-4931438

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#219310

**Issue**
When the delivered quantity of a product is less than the originally demanded quantity, the generated Delivery Guide XML shows the demand (product_uom_qty) instead of the actual delivered quantity (quantity). This results in an incorrect quantity being displayed in the DTE.

**Steps to Reproduce**
1. Install the Accounting module, Chilean localization, Sales module, and l10n_cl_edi_stock.
2. Create and confirm a new Sale Order.
3. Click on the Delivery smart button.
4. Adjust the delivered quantity to a value lower than the demand, save, and validate with no backorder.
5. Generate the Delivery Guide.
6. Open the generated DTE XML and observe that the quantity is incorrect.

**Root Cause**
The quantity displayed in the DTE is taken from product_uom_qty, which represents the planned quantity to be moved, not the actual delivered quantity. The correct field to use is quantity, which reflects the real delivered amount.

**Fix**
Change the XML output to use quantity instead of product_uom_qty to accurately reflect the actual delivered quantity in the DTE.

Opw-4892276

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#89633

If a fiscal position is not related to any tax, when selecting said fiscal position in the pos, the tax from the product is kept. When looking at the paid order in the backend the tax is removed on the order line and the price unit and price with taxes are different (although no tax recorder on the line).

Steps to reproduce:
-------------------
* Create a fiscal position and assign no tax to it
* On the pos config, add this fiscal position and the domestic one to the available fiscal positions
* Open pos session
* Select a product that has a 15% tax
* Change the fiscal position to the one just created
> Observation: We still see that the tax is computed based on the 15%
* Pay the order
* Go see the order in backend
> Observation: price unit: 100, no tax, price with taxes 115

Why the fix:
------------
A recent refactoring happened on the accounting side related to fiscal positions: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/9a97157920c845120861dda49d81d3150e015974

https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/e284dfd80bde632e6446fc0b8d3276689da35200/addons/account/models/partner.py#L155-L163

The behavior after this refactoring is the following: When changing fiscal position:
- If the original tax is available for the fiscal position, we use it
- If the original tax is not available but the fiscal position has an available tax that is set to be replacement for the original one, we use the replacement tax
- If the original tax is not available but the fiscal position has an available tax which is NOT a replacement for the original one, we keep the original one
- If the fiscal position has no tax available, we remove the tax

In this fix we apply the same logic inside the pos.

Without the fix we would keep the original tax in the frontend but when passed in the backend the tax with fiscal position was recomputed with the logic from accounting. This explained the difference we observed.

opw-4978056

**Issue**
When the delivered quantity of a product is less than the originally demanded quantity, the generated Delivery Guide XML shows the demand (product_uom_qty) instead of the actual delivered quantity (quantity). This results in an incorrect quantity being displayed in the DTE.

**Steps to Reproduce**
1. Install the Accounting module, Chilean localization, Sales module, and l10n_cl_edi_stock.
2. Create and confirm a new Sale Order.
3. Click on the Delivery smart button.
4. Adjust the delivered quantity to a value lower than the demand, save, and validate with no backorder.
5. Generate the Delivery Guide.
6. Open the generated DTE XML and observe that the quantity is incorrect.

**Root Cause**
The quantity displayed in the DTE is taken from product_uom_qty, which represents the planned quantity to be moved, not the actual delivered quantity. The correct field to use is quantity, which reflects the real delivered amount.

**Fix**
Change the XML output to use quantity instead of product_uom_qty to accurately reflect the actual delivered quantity in the DTE.

Opw-4892276

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#89633

Issue
-----
When using Shiprocket with the "Cash On Delivery", the request sent to the Shiprocket API doesn't contain the amounts discounted by coupons.

Steps to reproduce
-----
- Set an Indian company up (with valid address and some dummy mail & phone)
- Create a customer "IN Cust" (with valid address and some dummy mail & phone)
- Create a product "IN Prod"
	- Sale price: 1000 INR
	- Weight: 100g
	- Set some reference, eg "INPROD"
- Create a Shiprocket delivery method
	- Payment Method: COD
	- Set some "Shiprocket Channel"
	- Enable Debug requests
- In settings, enable "Promotions, Loyalty & Gift Card"
- Go to Sales > Products > Discount & Loyalty
- Create a new program
	- Name: 50% off
	- Program Type: Coupons
	- Change the existing reward to 50% discount on order
	- Generate some coupon
	- Copy the code of the generated coupon
- Create a SO our product and customer
- Use the coupon code & apply the 50% discount
- Add shipping
	- Shiprocket COD
	- Get rate
- Confirm the SO
- Go to the picking & validate it
- Open logs (Settings/Technical/Database Structure/Logging)
- Open the "shiprocket_request_external/shipments/create/forward-shipment" log

--> total_discount is 0

Cause
-----
The problem comes from

https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/a971f55e736f9645eda137fd6dcb574483886483/delivery_shiprocket/models/shiprocket_request.py#L301

There are 2 issues here.

The first and most important one is how we find the discount lines.

https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/a971f55e736f9645eda137fd6dcb574483886483/delivery_shiprocket/models/shiprocket_request.py#L320

Discounts from coupons don't use the `sale_discount_product_id`. We can use the `_can_be_invoiced_alone` function to find both regular and loyalty discounts

https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/ee63fe7863dfa0083674dc927c1aa67c9e36c481/addons/sale/models/sale_order_line.py#L1033-L1041
 
    def _can_be_invoiced_alone(self):
        """ Whether a given line is meaningful to invoice alone.

        It is generally meaningless/confusing or even wrong to invoice some specific SOlines
        (delivery, discounts, rewards, ...) without others, unless they are the only left to invoice
        in the SO.
        """
        self.ensure_one()
        return self.product_id.id != self.company_id.sale_discount_product_id.id

https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/ee63fe7863dfa0083674dc927c1aa67c9e36c481/addons/sale_loyalty/models/sale_order_line.py#L50-L51

    def _can_be_invoiced_alone(self):
        return super()._can_be_invoiced_alone() and not self.is_reward_line

We just have to be careful not to accidentally include delivery fees because of

https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/ee63fe7863dfa0083674dc927c1aa67c9e36c481/addons/delivery/models/sale_order_line.py#L18-L19

    def _can_be_invoiced_alone(self):
        return super()._can_be_invoiced_alone() and not self.is_delivery

The second issue is that we use the untaxed discount amount.

https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/a971f55e736f9645eda137fd6dcb574483886483/delivery_shiprocket/models/shiprocket_request.py#L321

This leads to an incoherent total amount, since the tax is computed on the products' full prices. We should instead be forwarding the total discount value (with tax included to offset the taxes applied on the full product price).

-----
Community PR:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/223517
Ticket:
opw-4755357

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#94798
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#92310

*: test_import_export

### Steps to reproduce:

- Go to Sales/Prodcuts/Pricelists
- Create a new pricelist with a rule with a set Valid Period
- Export that record adding the Pricelist Rule/Start Date (item_ids/date_start) as XLSX format
- Delete the record and test the import the XLSX file
#### Uncaught Promise:
> Invalid props for component 'ImportDataColumnError' :'resultNames' is undefined (should be a array)

### Cause of the Issue:

The issue is raised by the error message:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/32bdff8bc603a03038d3f9e38463809883319305/addons/base_import/models/base_import.py#L1428-L1432
which is not properly handled by the `ImportDataColumnError` component. However, in the present situation, the issue is just that this error message itself should not be raised in the first place.

#### Details:

Since commit 630b2683d3aad203b0bbf7d2d63b88cd4d3bd9d7, date and datetime formatted cells in spreadsheets are no longer Char field. Instead, they are imported as date and datetime objects. This was intended to allow importing columns with mixed encodings (e.g., some values stored as strings, others as dates in the spreadsheet).

However, a side effect of this change is that if a char-type field contains values that a spreadsheet interprets as dates or datetimes, the import fails. For example, an account move name "21/12/2025" may be interpreted as a date. Attempting to perform a join on this string expected value causes a traceback here: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/32bdff8bc603a03038d3f9e38463809883319305/addons/base_import/models/base_import.py#L1628-L1632

To address this discrepancy, commit 91dca74b3e395c8ee410db18784990ba3a6a7e6e introduced a check raising an error if the imported field type is not appropriate to carry a `date/datetime` value.

This fix has two major issues:

1) It still does not handle the above use case correctly—it remains impossible to import "21/12/2025" as a record name. 
2) (The present issue) It does not properly check the type of related fields. For example, a field like "company_id/partner_id/membership_start" is not considered as an allowed date field. The current check on allowed date fields being overly simplistic:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/32bdff8bc603a03038d3f9e38463809883319305/addons/base_import/models/base_import.py#L1416-L1421

### Fix:

We propose reverting commit 91dca74b3e395c8ee410db18784990ba3a6a7e6e. And instead of recursively computing the related model and the appropriate types of related fields (including property-type relational fields), we will simply stringify values when they are written into char-like fields (e.g., char or text).

Note: this may also require an adjustment in master for the html type.

opw-4935423
---
I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#226807

**Issue**
When the delivered quantity of a product is less than the originally demanded quantity, the generated Delivery Guide XML shows the demand (product_uom_qty) instead of the actual delivered quantity (quantity). This results in an incorrect quantity being displayed in the DTE.

**Steps to Reproduce**
1. Install the Accounting module, Chilean localization, Sales module, and l10n_cl_edi_stock.
2. Create and confirm a new Sale Order.
3. Click on the Delivery smart button.
4. Adjust the delivered quantity to a value lower than the demand, save, and validate with no backorder.
5. Generate the Delivery Guide.
6. Open the generated DTE XML and observe that the quantity is incorrect.

**Root Cause**
The quantity displayed in the DTE is taken from product_uom_qty, which represents the planned quantity to be moved, not the actual delivered quantity. The correct field to use is quantity, which reflects the real delivered amount.

**Fix**
Change the XML output to use quantity instead of product_uom_qty to accurately reflect the actual delivered quantity in the DTE.

Opw-4892276

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#89633

### Issue:
Given a specific configuration, the `SwitchCompanyMenu` will not display all the companies a user can access. Suppose we have a company hierarchy with the following: `Company 1 > Company 2 > Company 3` (where 2 is a branch of 1, and 3 is a branch of 2). If a user has access to C1 and C3, but not C2, the menu selector will only display C1, rather than a hierarchy of all 3 companies with C2 disabled.

This menu has been improved between versions, but the logic behind how we determine which companies to display remains consistent. We loop over each root company from `companyService.allowedCompaniesWithAncestors`, add it, and then add its children. Depending on whether the child company is accessible, it will be disabled (but still displayed) in the hierarchy list.

`companyService` pulls its company information from the `session['user_companies']` dict that is created from `session_info`. For each of the `allowed_companies`, we build the `child_ids` from the intersection of each `user.company_id.child_ids` and `user.company_ids`. So we only add the child if it itself is an allowed company, which C2 would not be. C1 is now considered a root company with no children in our loop, so C2 is skipped. C2 isn't a root company either, so it will never be seen, and therefore neither will C3.

### Solution:
A similar case was addressed in #138942, where given the same company hierarchy as above, the user instead has access to C2 and C3, but not C1. This PR adjusted how we build the `child_ids` for `disallowed_ancestor_companies` (C1 in this case), properly setting the children for us to loop through. We can use this same logic for the `child_ids` of `allowed_companies`, ensuring we can properly loop through the disallowed children of allowed companies.  Additionally, we need to adapt the `CompanySelector` component, which previously grabbed all children even if they were disallowed.

opw-4880477

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#217001

Currently, when entering a validity period on a pricelist, it can happen that a pricelist rule is not applied while being before the end period.

Steps to reproduce (for BE timezone):
-------------------------------------
* Create a pricelist
* Add a pricelist rule for a product (min qty=1, price=5$)
* Add a validity period for the rule, set the end date 30minutes after your current time
* In the settings of the pos add the pricelist to the list of available pricelists
* Open session
* Add the product related to the rule
* Change the pricelist
> Observation: The rule is not applied

Why the fix:
------------
Let's say on the computer it's 15h. The rule is thus set to end at 15h30.

`luxon.DateTime.now()` -> 15h, the zone name is brussels. `deserializeDate(item.date_end)` -> 13h30, zone name is brussels as well.
And 15h in brussels is greater then 13h30 in brussels.

`date_end` is already in UTC format, so we need to specify it. Now, `deserializeDate(item.date_end, { zone: "utc" })` -> 13h30, zone name is utc And 15h in brussels is before 13h30 in utc (since 13h30 is 15h30 in BXL)

opw-4992892