Friday, October 3, 2025
7 changes · saas-18.2
Resolved issues and error corrections
Uploaded file fields added to field service worksheet templates are now shown when customers or workers view the worksheet report in the portal. This ensures signed worksheet reports include all entered information, avoiding missing attachments or incomplete documentation.
Original PR description
Steps to reproduce: ------- - Install industry_fsm_report module - Open FSM app - Select worksheets from settings in the configuration - Go to worksheet templates in the configuration - Create a worksheet template - Click the design template button. You arrive in the studio - Add file field and close it - Create a new task and select a newly created template in the worksheet template - Click the worksheet button in the control panel - Upload a file and save it - Click on the sign report button - Here file field is not visible Issue: ------- The file field is not visible in the worksheet portal. Cause: ------ The view of the file field is not created for the worksheet portal. Solution: ------- Created the view of the file field to display in the worksheet portal. task-3691529 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#95754 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#56035
This fix stops Mexican PoS orders with different required e-invoicing fields from being combined into one invoice. Instead of causing a system error, users now receive a clear validation message explaining that the orders cannot be consolidated.
Original PR description
Issue: Currently when we consolidate billing for PoS orders we receive an error because some l10n fields expect a single record and not a recordset. This can be solved by looping over the PoS orders instead and preparing the invoice values per order (this is how the sale orders handles consolidated billing) however, we run into an issue if not all PoS orders have the same l10n fields. Ideally PoS orders with different l10n fields should not be consolidated. Purpose of this PR: check to make sure that the three l10n_mx_edi fields are the same among PoS orders before creating consolidated invoice. raise a validation error if the fields are not the same. Steps to reproduce on Runbot: install pos and l10n_mx* create pos orders for same contact try to create invoices with consolidated billing enabled singleton error is raised Note: main discussion about consolidated billing with l10n_mx localization: #86255 opw-4802180
Rental subscriptions using kit products now keep the correct delivered quantity when they are closed or reopened. This prevents return errors that incorrectly claimed more items were being returned than had been delivered.
Original PR description
Versions -------- - 18.0+ Steps ----- 1. Enable rental transfers; 2. have a rental product with a kit BoM; 3. create a subscription order in the Rental app; 4. add the rental product; 5. confirm…
Versions -------- - 18.0+ Steps ----- 1. Enable rental transfers; 2. have a rental product with a kit BoM; 3. create a subscription order in the Rental app; 4. add the rental product; 5. confirm order; 6. validate deliveries; 7. close the subscription. Issue ----- Invalid SQL command, cannot return more than was delivered. Cause ----- When closing or reopening a subscription, the `_compute_qty_delivered` method gets triggered. By default, these methods required the relevant moves to have the same `product_id` as the sale order line. For products with kit BoMs, the move's `product_id` is tied to the BoM instead of the final product, leading to `qty_delivered` getting reset reset to 0 on recompute. This causes an error, as `qty_returned` is non-zero. Solution -------- The `qty_delivered` for these lines was set in the `_action_done` method of `stock.move`. By instead moving this logic into a `_compute_qty_delivered` override, any recompute should have the same result, instead of getting reset to 0. opw-4833280 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#88691
This fix ensures sales order line prices are recalculated correctly when a field service task is moved out of warranty. It prevents billable items from incorrectly staying at zero after warranty status changes, helping keep customer invoices accurate.
Original PR description
### Steps to reproduce:
- Create a sales order linked to the customer
- Assign a customer (partner) to the task and link the task to the sales order
- Create a sales order line for a product and link it to the task
- Verify the price unit matches the product's list price by default
- Set the task as under warranty
- Add or remove an item from SOL
- Verify the price unit is set to 0.0 in the sales order line
- Unset the warranty status
- Add an item to the SOL
### Cause:
When setting the task as under warranty we modify the price of each SOL to 0.0 but when unset the warranty option we try to fetch the prices from the SOL which we already set it to 0.0
### Fix:
Backporting https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/pull/85492/commits/8615fad5b75d32483b25cf9b1525883e7a730fac to check when writing on the under_warranty value we recompute the SOL prices
opw-4579404
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#96045Fixes an issue where changing custom date ranges while editing budget report amounts could cause an error and block the user. The budget report now matches monthly budget items consistently, preventing duplicate incomplete entries and keeping budget editing reliable.
Original PR description
Currently, an error occurs when user editing the budget report items. Steps to Reproduce [Video](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1bz0GEQjwxQrckzcEHdYPfvaA5M43lmFF/view): - Install the `Accounting`…
Currently, an error occurs when user editing the budget report items. Steps to Reproduce [Video](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1bz0GEQjwxQrckzcEHdYPfvaA5M43lmFF/view): - Install the `Accounting` module. - Go to `Profit and Loss` > `Budget` and `create a budget`. - Select `custom dates (e.g., start: 01/01/2025, end: 12/10/2025)` and change the amount of a budget line. - Change the `date range (e.g., start: 01/10/2025, end: 12/10/2025)` and change the amount again. - `Switch back to the first date range` (start: 01/01/2025, end: 12/10/2025) and try changing the amount once more. `TypeError: unsupported operand type(s) for +: 'float' and 'NoneType'` This error occurs when a user editing the budget report items. When user enters a date period, the system creates budget items for the first date of every month within that range. If the user then changes the date period to the next date of the same month, the system attempts to fetch the existing budget item `[1]` for that range. However, due to the start date alignment, it fails to fetch the correct budget item and instead creates an extra one `[2]`. Later, when the system checks again from the first date of the same month as the start date, it finds this extra budget item, for that the amount is None, which raises the error `[3]`. This commit ensures that when fetching existing items and generating the start month dates `[4]`, the system always uses the first day of the month as the `start date` so that the flow is maintained.. [1]- https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/1df83837a2aec4801b34a9a7ab0cd68f640b4fd6/account_reports/models/budget.py#L44-L49 [2]- https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/1df83837a2aec4801b34a9a7ab0cd68f640b4fd6/account_reports/models/budget.py#L75-L79 [3]- https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/1df83837a2aec4801b34a9a7ab0cd68f640b4fd6/account_reports/models/budget.py#L72 [4]- https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/1df83837a2aec4801b34a9a7ab0cd68f640b4fd6/account_reports/models/budget.py#L58-L61 sentry-6883207225 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#95090
Fixed an issue where Italian fiscal receipts were not printed when the point of sale was set to skip the receipt screen. The system now prints the completed sale receipt reliably, preventing missing fiscal tickets and printer errors during checkout.
Original PR description
This PR fixes two related bugs happening when printing a receipt with the Italian Fiscal printer First, before this PR, if the option to skip the receipt screen was ticked, then the receipt would…
This PR fixes two related bugs happening when printing a receipt with the Italian Fiscal printer First, before this PR, if the option to skip the receipt screen was ticked, then the receipt would never print. This was caused by the printing logic being implemented on the receipt screen instead of on the pos itself. steps to reproduce: 1. install l10n_it_pos 2. configure one pos 3. configure the IT printer 4. select to skip the receipt screen (print automatically) 5. open the pos 6. make a sale => no ticket printed and the chrome console shows a printer error With this new verison the printing logic was moved to the pos so that printing of fiscal receipts with the italian fiscal printer works, even when receipt screen is skipped. This put to light another potential bug related to how the `order` variable was treated. Before this PR, the printReceipt logic in the module would not pass the order to be printed. This can become a problem upon context changes, where `pos.get_order()` does not return the completed order, but a newly created one. This can for example happen when skipping the receipt screen with the option to "print automatically" (iface_print_auto). After this PR, we keep order as an argument, so we always print the last completed order and not a newly created one. opw-4882480 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#91412
DHL shipping rates and shipment creation now include the configured insurance amount when insurance is enabled. This ensures customers receive accurate delivery pricing and insured shipments, with a clear error if insurance is unavailable for a route.
Original PR description
**PROBLEM** Insuring a delivery using the dhl carrier don't work. It doesn't affect the estimated rate of the delivery, and the shipment created when validating the delivery order isn't insured.…
**PROBLEM** Insuring a delivery using the dhl carrier don't work. It doesn't affect the estimated rate of the delivery, and the shipment created when validating the delivery order isn't insured. **STEP TO REPRODUCE** 1. Install the `delivery_dhl_rest` and the `l10n_be` modules (we will use the be demo company). 2. Set the insurance percentage of the dhl be delivery method to 100%, and set the region to Europe (the demo data is incorrect), and activate the debug (click the "No Debug" smart button to activate the log of requests). 3. Switch to the be company. 5. Create a sale order, with a customer located in Belgium, and add shipping using the dhl method. 6. Go to the delivery order, and validate it. 7. Go to settings/Technical/Logging and look at the rating_request and shipment_request, notice there is no information about insurance. **CAUSE** We don't send any info about insurance in the api requests. **FIX** Computing and sending the insured amount, only if the insurance percentage is not null. If the package can't be insured between the origin and the destination, a error message will be displayed when updating the delivery price. **TESTS PROBLEM/FIX** The localization of `your_company` was not recognized by DHL, leading to the DHL api returning a 0 delivery price. Switching the localization to Eghezee, Rue du Laid Burniat 5 fixes this. Assertion regarding the delivery price were restored. The picking date could sometimes be refused by DHL (stop working after arround 4/5 PM). Changing the picking date to, two day after, at noon works. `test_01_dhl_basic_be_domestic_flow` was modified to also test domestic shipment insurance in addition of the basic flow. Some code in it was refactor into inner function to avoid boilerplate. Adding `INSURED_RATE_MOCK_RESPONSE` to mock response in test_01. opw-4989281 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#93105