Friday, January 23, 2026
16 changes · saas-18.4
Resolved issues and error corrections
This update fixes a bug that prevented the dashboard from accurately counting high-priority maintenance requests. The fix ensures that critical maintenance tasks are correctly identified and displayed, allowing users to prioritize maintenance efforts effectively. This improves visibility and operational efficiency.
Original PR description
Issue before this commit: ========================= The high-priority maintenance request count (todo_request_count_high_priority) was not calculated correctly. Steps to Reproduce:…
Issue before this commit: ========================= The high-priority maintenance request count (todo_request_count_high_priority) was not calculated correctly. Steps to Reproduce: ========================= - Install the maintenance module. - Create a maintenance request and set the Priority to High (3-starred) in the form view. - Open the dashboard. - Observe that the high-priority request count is not displayed. - The count always remains 0, even when high-priority requests exist. Cause of the issue: ========================= In this [PR](https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/94866), the logic was mistakenly changed. The priority field is defined as a Selection field, but while computing the count, the comparison was done against an integer(3, not '3') instead of the actual string value. Since the stored value is '3' (string), the condition is always evaluated to False, resulting in a count of 0. With This Commit: ========================= Ensure that high-priority maintenance requests are correctly counted and displayed on the dashboard when they exist. This provides better visibility of critical requests and helps users prioritise maintenance work effectively. Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#244987
This update optimizes how Odoo sends notifications, specifically when the system is under heavy load. By using a faster JSON serialization library, ‘orjson’, the system processes notifications more efficiently, reducing delays and improving overall responsiveness. This results in a smoother user experience.
Original PR description
When the gevent server is under high load, the time required to acquire a cursor and fetch notifications increases. This causes notifications to accumulate, leading to larger payloads. Serializing these large payloads using the standard json library becomes a bottleneck. In a gevent environment, this monopolizes the event loop, delaying the processing of other greenlets. This commit introduces optional support for `orjson`. If installed, it is used to significantly speed up JSON encoding, freeing up the event loop. Using `orjson` increases the throughput by ~20% under high load. Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#245072 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#241601
This update ensures that the live chat answer selection dropdown only displays answers relevant to the current chatbot script, regardless of whether a search term is entered. Previously, the dropdown showed all answers, leading to confusion. This change improves the user experience and accuracy of live chat interactions.
Original PR description
**Description of the issue/feature this PR addresses:** In the `triggering_answer_ids` searchable dropdown, when no value is entered, the `_search_display_name` method of `chatbot_script_answer` is…
**Description of the issue/feature this PR addresses:**
In the `triggering_answer_ids` searchable dropdown, when no value is entered, the `_search_display_name` method of `chatbot_script_answer` is not called. Instead, the ORM falls back to the field’s default domain and returns all `chatbot.script.answer` records, including those from other scripts. When a value is entered, `_search_display_name` is triggered and the results are filtered correctly.
This behavior changed after PR #201587, where the `operator_optimization` step started executing before `determine_domain`. Since `determine_domain` is the step that triggers `_search_display_name`, it no longer gets called when the domain `('name', 'ilike', '')` is stripped by `operator_optimization`. Therefore, filtering only works when a non-empty filter value is provided.
**Current behavior before PR:**
All `chatbot.script.answer` records are shown in the `triggering_answer_ids` dropdown when no search value is entered, even if they don’t belong to the current chatbot script.
**Desired behavior after PR is merged:**
The `triggering_answer_ids` dropdown only shows answers belonging to the current chatbot script, regardless of whether a search value is entered.
task-[4968490](https://www.odoo.com/odoo/project/1519/tasks/4968490)
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#228192This update resolves an issue where the user interface was blocked when the PIN modal appeared, preventing employees from clocking in. The fix ensures the UI remains accessible and functional during the PIN modal process, improving the employee experience.
Original PR description
We now unblock the UI when the PIN modal appears, as it was unusable behind the loader telling "clocking in".
This update removes the outdated 'Por Definir' payment method as the default for invoices, sale orders, and POS orders in the MX e-invoicing module. This resolves a fiscal inconsistency caused by the previous default, ensuring compliance with the PUE payment policy and providing clearer guidance to users.
Original PR description
### Issue: The payment method `99 – Por Definir` was used as the default value for invoices, sale orders, and POS orders This leads to fiscal inconsistencies, especially when invoices use the `PUE`…
### Issue: The payment method `99 – Por Definir` was used as the default value for invoices, sale orders, and POS orders This leads to fiscal inconsistencies, especially when invoices use the `PUE` payment policy, where this payment method is invalid ### Cause: In the `_compute_l10n_mx_edi_payment_method_id` methods, the default value was always set to `Por Definir` ### Fix: After discussion with the PO (MIAL), the chosen solution is to archive the payment method `99 – Por Definir`and remove it as a default value All valid cases should already be handled explicitly, making it clear to the user that something is missing when the data is blank ### Steps to reproduce: - Install `l10n_mx_edi` and switch to the MX company - Create an invoice with today’s invoice date - The payment policy is set to PUE - Before the fix, the payment method is set to `Por Definir` For Sale Order and POS Order tests, it's the default value as soon as you create an order opw-5406038 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#105058 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#104164
This update addresses a correction in the import of Swiss payroll tax rates for the 2026 tax year. The change ensures accurate transmission of single canton data, aligning with updated Swiss tax regulations. This ensures compliance and accurate reporting for Swiss businesses using the Odoo Enterprise solution.
Original PR description
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#104333
This update resolves an issue preventing point of sale functionality within the l10n_ar_edi module for Odoo Enterprise. The fix ensures proper VAT processing for sales transactions in Argentina, addressing a previous error that blocked this key feature. This improves compliance and usability for businesses operating in the Argentine market.
Original PR description
Tarea: 62909 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#105104
This update resolves an issue where the extra invoicing information required for EDI transactions was hidden from users on the ecommerce platform. The change ensures that all necessary invoicing details are correctly displayed, streamlining the sales process for customers using EDI. This improves the user experience and compliance.
Original PR description
The extra invoicing info step for EDI was unpublished and hidden on ecommerce. This commit fixes that. Task-5493138 --- I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#245179
This update fixes an issue where Odoo incorrectly exported negative discounts in Peppol BIS 3 invoices. The change ensures that negative discounts are now correctly classified as surcharges, aligning with industry standards and preventing calculation errors. This update is crucial for accurate data exchange with PEPPOL trading partners.
Original PR description
In Peppol BIS 3 (UBL 2.1), negative discounts are logically treated as Surcharges (Charges) rather than Allowances. Previously, Odoo exported negative discounts as an Allowance with a negative amount and a numeric reason code (95). This violated: BR-CL-20 / PEPPOL-EN16931-CL003: Coded charge reasons must belong to the UNCL 7161 (alphabetic) list when ChargeIndicator is 'true'. PEPPOL-EN16931-R120: The line net amount calculation failed due to the negative sign in the calculation. Solution: Dynamically toggles ChargeIndicator based on the discount sign. Swaps AllowanceChargeReasonCode to 'ADK' (Surcharge) for negative discounts. task-5432024 Description of the issue/feature this PR addresses: Current behavior before PR: Desired behavior after PR is merged: --- I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#245136 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#244679
This update corrects a timezone discrepancy in invoices sent to ZATCA, ensuring accurate time formatting. Previously, the system added a +03:00 offset, which ZATCA requires to be sent in the Asia/Riyadh timezone. This fix ensures invoices are correctly formatted for ZATCA compliance.
Original PR description
The time information added to the date of the invoice post for ZATCA in iso format which adds +03:00. However ZATCA expects the time to be sent as is in Asia/Riyadh timezone. - Set up a ZATCA company and onboard a journal - To simulate the timezone issue, replace the hour value with 23h in the following line: vals['l10n_sa_confirmation_datetime'] = datetime.combine(move.invoice_date, fields.Datetime.now().time()). (use .replace(hour=23))) - Create, confirm, and send an invoice to ZATCA opw-5373067 Description of the issue/feature this PR addresses: Current behavior before PR: Desired behavior after PR is merged: --- I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#244761 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#243961
This update fixes a calculation error in the VAT sales reports for Vietnam. The previous formula excluded the base amount for 8% VAT transactions, leading to inaccurate sales reporting. This change ensures the total taxable base is calculated correctly, improving financial reporting accuracy.
Original PR description
`VAT_SALES` report line aggregates total untaxed amount from its children lines. Previously, the formula for this line was missing `VAT_SALES_8.amount_untaxed`. As a result, the base amount for 8% VAT transactions was excluded from the total sales base calculation. This commit adds the missing tag to the `VAT_SALES` formula to ensure the total taxable base is calculated correctly. task-5836154 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#244915
This update fixes a bug where journal entries could be posted even when referencing inactive analytic accounts. The change adds a validation step during posting to ensure all referenced accounts are active, preventing incorrect financial postings. This improves data accuracy and reliability.
Original PR description
**Steps to produce:** - Install the `Accounting` module. - Enable analytic accounting in settings. - Create an analytic account (e.g., "test"). - Create a journal entry and assign the analytic…
**Steps to produce:** - Install the `Accounting` module. - Enable analytic accounting in settings. - Create an analytic account (e.g., "test"). - Create a journal entry and assign the analytic account in the analytic distribution. - Post the entry and export it(Make sure `journal items/account` and `journal items/analytic distribution` are also included). - `Archive` the analytic account. - Import the exported entry `OR` Duplicate the previous created entry. - Try to post the imported entry. **Issue:** - The entry is posted even if the analytic account used in the analytic distribution is inactive. **Root cause:** - The `analytic_distribution` field is stored as JSON. - At [1], the `_str_to_json` method only attempts `json.loads(value)`, and if parsing fails, it raises an error. **Solution:** - Add a validation when posting journal entries to ensure that all analytic accounts referenced in the analytic distribution are active. [1]: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/13e8b462e74f144e085492857bfaa7b0d1f88f93/odoo/addons/base/models/ir_fields.py#L196-L202 opw-5350980 --- I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#243534 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#239988
This update fixes a problem preventing successful payments through Stripe. The issue stemmed from incorrect currency decimal rounding during the payment process. The fix ensures accurate amount transmission to Stripe, resolving payment failures and improving the reliability of Stripe transactions.
Original PR description
### Issue: The stripe payments are failing to due setting currency decimals. #### Steps to reproduce: 1- In USD currency form in developer mode, set the rounding factor to `0.001000`, so we have 3…
### Issue: The stripe payments are failing to due setting currency decimals. #### Steps to reproduce: 1- In USD currency form in developer mode, set the rounding factor to `0.001000`, so we have 3 decimal places. 2- From `Decimal Accuracy` set Price Unit to 4 digits. 3- Refresh the page. 4- Create a SO and add a line. Set the price to `200.7647`. 5- Refresh the page again and generate a payment link. 6- Pay through stripe. As you see payments fail. ### Cause: This is due to rounding the amount before sending to stripe: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/824e0c42c62de7f570f106860e7dcbf1f7344c14/addons/payment_stripe/models/payment_transaction.py#L160-L165 We are rounding the amount to the minor currency unit. However, we make a compare between `tx_amount` and the amount paid through stripe: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/824e0c42c62de7f570f106860e7dcbf1f7344c14/addons/payment/models/payment_transaction.py#L726-L732 Which are not equal. We should use minor current unit as `precision_digits` to fix this issue. opw-5496825
This update resolves an issue where image snippets weren't consistently updating across the website builder. The fix ensures that the correct image is always used in subsequent handler calls, resulting in a more reliable and accurate image snippet display for users. This improves the overall user experience when adding images to website content.
Original PR description
[FIX] html-builder, *: update snippet at each snippet dropped handler *: website In the `ImageSnippetOptionPlugin`, at the `on_snippet_dropped_handlers` call, the `snippetEl` received as argument is replaced by the image selected by the user in the media dialog. The problem is that the call to subsequent handlers is done with `snippetEl` that is not an element of the DOM anymore. This commit fixes this by updating `snippetEl` if needed after each call to a `on_snippet_dropped_handlers` handler. task-5785233
This update resolves a bug where full payments on invoices with installment payment terms were incorrectly generating duplicate tax entries. The fix ensures that only the remaining balance is processed as a tax payment when an invoice is fully paid, aligning with the intended batch functionality. This improves the accuracy of cash basis accounting.
Original PR description
**Steps to reproduce:** 1. Install the `Accounting` module. 2. Enable cash basis taxes in `Accounting → Configuration → Settings → Taxes → Cash Basis`. 3. Create a tax, set `Tax Exigibility` to…
**Steps to reproduce:** 1. Install the `Accounting` module. 2. Enable cash basis taxes in `Accounting → Configuration → Settings → Taxes → Cash Basis`. 3. Create a tax, set `Tax Exigibility` to `Based on Payment`, and assign a `Cash Basis Transition Account`. 4. Create an invoice with the cash basis tax and a payment term such as `30% now, balance in 60 days`. 5. Record a full payment on the invoice instead of just the first installment. 6. Review the generated cash basis journal entries. **Observed behavior:** * Cash basis entries are created for the full tax amount, not proportionally. * Paying the full invoice with payment terms causes duplicated tax entries. This came from the fact that we didn't consider a move would be fully paid by several lines at the same time, like with installments. We now only put the leftover amount when the move is fully paid and we're on the last partial. Also fix the fact that paying 2 invoices at the same time in full does not benefit from the batches opw-5061136 --- I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#236536
This update resolves an issue where invoices generated with the Solution Factible PAC in Mexico were being rejected due to incorrect exchange rate formatting. The fix ensures that exchange rates are rounded to the required 6 decimal places, aligning with Mexican tax regulations and preventing invoice errors. This ensures compliance and accurate CFDI generation.
Original PR description
The PACs Quadrum and SwSapien both require the exchange rate to have 6 decimal places. This can cause some valid invoices to be rejected for large enough payment values. Pull request…
The PACs Quadrum and SwSapien both require the exchange rate to have 6 decimal places. This can cause some valid invoices to be rejected for large enough payment values. Pull request [83499](https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/pull/83499) added rounding precision for these PACs. Now, the remaining PAC (Solution Factible) appears to the same requirement. This commit ensures that the previous bug fix is applied to all PACs. [opw-5165200](https://www.odoo.com/odoo/project.task/5165200) ## Steps to reproduce: [Setup](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1BUkNG-Ezk-I47yvbNolOmlj0ne1iqDto/view?usp=sharing) 1. Navigate to Apps and install l10n_mx_edi. 2. Switch to any of the Mexican companies that appear. 3. Navigate to Accounting > Configuration > Currencies. 4. Click into the USD currency. 5. Change the current rate to be 20.101796407186 MXN per USD. (inverse_company_rate field). 6. Navigate to Accounting > Configuration > Settings, and set the PAC to Solution Factible. [Workflow](https://drive.google.com/file/d/11TFZ78QGDYdnD9R3CoJDAuFI-1_0dNyG/view?usp=sharing) 1. Navigate to Accounting > Customers > Invoices. 2. Select New to create a new invoice. 3. Add a mexican customer (such as XENON INDUSTRIAL ARTICLES). 4. Add the 45 day Payment terms. This should change the payment policy to PPD. 5. Change the currency to USD. 6. Add the product FURN_8220 (or any with the unspsc_code_id set). 7. Set the unit price of the product to 58968.29. 8. Confirm the invoice. 9. Select Send & Print, then ensure that the CFDI option is selected before clicking Send & Print again. 10. Select Register Payment, then Confirm Payment. 11. Select the Update Payments smart button. 12. Navigate to the CFDI tab; there will be a "Payment Send in Error" line. Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#105102 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#102557