Monday, February 9, 2026
6 changes · 19.0
New functionality added to Odoo
This update introduces a new module that allows businesses to generate a required .csv file (FAF) for the Federal Tax Authority (FTA). Generating this file is necessary for audit and compliance purposes, bringing us closer to accreditation with the FTA. This ensures we meet regulatory requirements for VAT reporting.
Original PR description
The Federal Tax Authority (FTA) requires businesses to generate a FAF (FTA Audit File) for audit and compliance purposes in a .csv format. There are two kinds, VAT and Excise. In this task, we aim to…
The Federal Tax Authority (FTA) requires businesses to generate a FAF (FTA Audit File) for audit and compliance purposes in a .csv format. There are two kinds, VAT and Excise. In this task, we aim to generate a successful VAT Audit File, whereas we we will work to support the Excise Taxes and it's audit file in a separate task. This will bring us a step closer to re-registering us as an Accredited Software Vendor with the FTA (https://tax.gov.ae/en/tax.support/tax.accounting.software.vendors/accredited.tax.accounting.software.vendors.aspx). As per the FTA, "The FAF should be a pure collection of data in the comma-separated values (csv) file format and should be broken down by, but not limited to, invoices, credit notes etc., to give all the required information to FTA to conduct the Audit. The taxpayer should not be able to modify any value in the FAF. The FAF should not be an image file." This PR introduces a new module l10n_ae_saft which allows the users to export the a FAF .csv file from the general ledger. task-5256491
Resolved issues and error corrections
This update fixes an issue where failure messages weren't shown when a quality check was marked as failed. The change ensures that the correct failure message appears immediately after a quality check is marked as failed, improving user feedback and process clarity. This was achieved by correctly passing the view to display the failure message.
Original PR description
*= quality_control, quality_mrp_workorder, mrp_workorder Currently, when a user fails a quality check using the quick-action button, the failure message defined for that quality control point isn’t…
*= quality_control, quality_mrp_workorder, mrp_workorder Currently, when a user fails a quality check using the quick-action button, the failure message defined for that quality control point isn’t shown. **Steps to produce:** * Install `Quality` and `Manufacturing` with demo data * Go to MRP > Configuration > Operations > Manual Assembly * Create a pass/fail quality point with a failure message * Create and confirm an MO for `Table Top` * Go to Shop Floor > Activate work centers if inactive > Manual Assembly * Fail the assembly using the quick-action button Replication video: [Link](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1gBHrvQEAavhjU4lS-bKQHQjAa9qDHj6-/view?usp=sharing) **Observed Behavior:** * No failure message is displayed when the quality check is failed. **Root cause:** * This happens because pressing the quick-action button triggers `failCheck` [1] , which calls `doActionNext` [2], which then runs the server function `action_fail_and_next` [3]. That function sets `quality_state = fail` and calls [4] to get the view. But since [3] wraps that view inside a dictionary, the check in [5] never passes, so the message never appears. **Solution:** * Pass the view correctly to display the failure message. Since the quick action already marks the quality state as failed we can hide the Confirm and Back buttons by passing the context and checking it in the view to show a single OK button, similar to earlier versions. **Before:** <img width="1673" height="813" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/029e347b-5f2c-463a-833e-3b55677137b6" /> **After:** <img width="1687" height="829" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/e4c85093-ea0d-44ca-bc9c-0fab5ac08fbc" /> [1]: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/59c06537d82fedd1916b7aeb808dc73904f6a751/quality_mrp_workorder/static/src/mrp_display/quality_check.js#L83-L86 [2]: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/59c06537d82fedd1916b7aeb808dc73904f6a751/mrp_workorder/static/src/mrp_display/mrp_record_line/quality_check.js#L147-L163 [3]: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/59c06537d82fedd1916b7aeb808dc73904f6a751/quality_mrp_workorder/models/quality.py#L86-L89 [4]: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/59c06537d82fedd1916b7aeb808dc73904f6a751/quality_mrp_workorder/models/quality.py#L48-L68 [5]: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/19.0/mrp_workorder/static/src/mrp_display/mrp_record_line/quality_check.js#L154-L161 opw-5403465 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#102095
This update fixes an issue where the XML export for Belgium VAT listings was incomplete, only including the initial batch of partners. The change adjusts the export process to ensure all partners, regardless of the 'Load More' setting, are correctly included in the generated XML file. This improves the accuracy of VAT reporting.
Original PR description
# Steps to reproduce: * Install **Accounting** and **l10n_be_reports**. * Enable **debug mode**. * Go to **Accounting → Reporting → Belgium → Partner VAT Listing**. * Create invoices with invoice…
# Steps to reproduce: * Install **Accounting** and **l10n_be_reports**. * Enable **debug mode**. * Go to **Accounting → Reporting → Belgium → Partner VAT Listing**. * Create invoices with invoice lines with no product set on it, just a label, so that **more than 10 Belgian partners** appear in the report and ensure each partner has a **VAT number**. * Open the report **Options** tab and set **Load More Limit** to **5**. * Click **Load More** until all partners are visible. * Click **Returns** and create a return for the month you have created invoices for, and submit it. * Download the generated XML. # Observed behavior: * The XML file contains only the first batch of partners. * Partners shown after clicking **Load More** are missing from the export. # Cause: * In v17, the XML export button was defined as: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/42ef1fe589fc4e7fe4b611736253251c44506578/l10n_be_reports/models/partner_vat_listing.py#L53-L59 * This meant clicking the button would go through the [export_file](https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/42ef1fe589fc4e7fe4b611736253251c44506578/account_reports/models/account_report.py#L4927) method, which sets `options['export_mode'] = 'file'` before calling the export function. The test in v17 explicitly sets `export_mode = 'file'` to simulate what `export_file` does in production. * In v19, the architecture changed: - The XML export is now triggered via the account.return workflow and a submission wizard [1.](https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/19.0/l10n_be_reports/wizard/vat_listing_submission_wizard.py) - The wizard's `print_xml` method calls [_get_closing_report_options()](https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/19.0/account_reports/models/account_return.py#L1601) which does NOT set `export_mode = 'file'`. - The controller then calls `dispatch_report_action(options, file_generator)` directly, bypassing `export_file`. * Why the test changed: - In v17 test: `export_mode = 'file'` was set to mimic the `export_file` → `partner_vat_listing_export_to_xml` flow. - In v19 test: `export_mode = 'file'` should NOT be needed in the test because the fix is to set `export_mode = 'file'` inside `partner_vat_listing_export_to_xml` itself. # Fix: * Enable **export mode** when generating the XML. * Ensures all partners are included regardless of the load limit. opw-5494247
This update corrects an issue where Modelo 390 reports for past years were generating empty BOE files. The fix ensures the report period is correctly identified, pulling accurate data for the specified year from the Spanish tax agency. This resolves a reporting discrepancy impacting tax compliance.
Original PR description
### Issue: When exporting Modelo 390 reports for a past year, the BOE file was empty — all values were 0 ### Cause: In `export_boe()`, the `report_lines` were get based on the `section_report`…
### Issue: When exporting Modelo 390 reports for a past year, the BOE file was empty — all values were 0 ### Cause: In `export_boe()`, the `report_lines` were get based on the `section_report` options However, `section_reports` do not store the date or return periodicity of the selected report As a result, using their options always fetched data for the current period instead of the specified year ### Note: `_generate_mod_390_page2()` also had issues: some lines were missing or incorrectly indexed The mod 360 format, it strict in the structure with specific index so it may produce invalid documents The latest documentation for mod 390: https://sede.agenciatributaria.gob.es/static_files/Sede/Disenyo_registro/DR_300_399/archivos_25/dr390e2025.xlsx ### Steps to reproduce: - Install `l10n_es_reports` and switch to ES Company - Create an Invoice and a Bill (Any product, Price: 100.00, Tax: 21%, Invoice Date: 01/01/2025) - Open Tax Return, switch to Mod 390, and set year to 2025 - You should see data in the 2 first sections - Use the gear icon, and download the BOE - Use the gear icon to download the BOE, fill the wizard (Natural Person – Name: Test, Principal activity: Test, Activity Code: 12345), and generate the file Before the fix: all values in the BOE were 0 instead of matching the report opw-5457374 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#106676 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#104928
This update resolves a bug preventing users from installing modules after setting up a Belgian company with the account_accountant module. The issue stemmed from a registry reload delay during module installation, now corrected to ensure proper module installation.
Original PR description
Encountered this bug while trying to reproduce a bug from one of my ticket. **STEP TO REPRODUCE** On a fresh db with module account_accountant. 1. Create a new company with country set to Belgium. After l10n_modules are install, and the chart template loaded: 2. Try installing a module, and notice you can't. **CAUSE** button_install() doesn't reload the registry, so the sepa modules states are set to `to install` but are not install until the registry is reloaded, which doesn't happen on its own. button_immediate_install() does the same as button_install(), and reload the registry which trigger the actual installation process. Indirectly related to opw-5880247: when trying to reproduce the bug, I had to create a company, setup a chart of account on it. I created a belgium company -> setting it to belgium trigger the button_install, preventing me from installing payment module afterward.
This update resolves a problem where long item codes were causing errors in the AvaTax integration. The system now automatically limits item codes to 50 characters, ensuring successful tax calculations and preventing transaction failures. This improves the reliability of our tax processing.
Original PR description
Link to Avalara (Avatax) documentation: https://developer.avalara.com/api-reference/avatax/rest/v2/models/LineItemModel/ Expected Behaviour: The itemCode sent to the AvaTax API should be 50…
Link to Avalara (Avatax) documentation: https://developer.avalara.com/api-reference/avatax/rest/v2/models/LineItemModel/ Expected Behaviour: The itemCode sent to the AvaTax API should be 50 characters or fewer to comply with Avalara's field length constraints. Actual Behaviour before the Fix: When an itemCode exceeded 50 characters, the system attempted to send the request as-is. This resulted in the AvaTax API returning an error, causing the transaction or tax calculation to fail. Behaviour with the Fix: The system now ensures that the itemCode adheres to the 50-character limit before the API call is made, by trancating the code to the first 50 characters if it exceeds 50 characters. This prevents API rejection and ensures successful tax processing for items with long identifiers. Steps to reproduce: 1. Create or select a product/item with a reference (or barcode if using UPC) longer than 50 characters. 2. Trigger an action that calculates tax via the AvaTax integration (e.g., creating an invoice or updating a line item). 3. Observe the API response. - Before fix: API returns a validation error regarding the itemCode length. - After fix: Request is successful as the itemCode is properly handled/validated. opw-5406451 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#106085 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#105017