Monday, February 9, 2026
3 changes · saas-18.4
Resolved issues and error corrections
This update ensures that a failure message is now correctly displayed when a quality check is marked as failed. Previously, the system didn't show the intended failure notification. The fix corrects a technical issue related to how the system handles quality check states, ensuring users receive the expected feedback.
Original PR description
*= quality_control, quality_mrp_workorder, mrp_workorder Currently, when a user fails a quality check using the quick-action button, the failure message defined for that quality control point isn’t…
*= quality_control, quality_mrp_workorder, mrp_workorder Currently, when a user fails a quality check using the quick-action button, the failure message defined for that quality control point isn’t shown. **Steps to produce:** * Install `Quality` and `Manufacturing` with demo data * Go to MRP > Configuration > Operations > Manual Assembly * Create a pass/fail quality point with a failure message * Create and confirm an MO for `Table Top` * Go to Shop Floor > Activate work centers if inactive > Manual Assembly * Fail the assembly using the quick-action button Replication video: [Link](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1gBHrvQEAavhjU4lS-bKQHQjAa9qDHj6-/view?usp=sharing) **Observed Behavior:** * No failure message is displayed when the quality check is failed. **Root cause:** * This happens because pressing the quick-action button triggers `failCheck` [1] , which calls `doActionNext` [2], which then runs the server function `action_fail_and_next` [3]. That function sets `quality_state = fail` and calls [4] to get the view. But since [3] wraps that view inside a dictionary, the check in [5] never passes, so the message never appears. **Solution:** * Pass the view correctly to display the failure message. Since the quick action already marks the quality state as failed we can hide the Confirm and Back buttons by passing the context and checking it in the view to show a single OK button, similar to earlier versions. **Before:** <img width="1673" height="813" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/029e347b-5f2c-463a-833e-3b55677137b6" /> **After:** <img width="1687" height="829" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/e4c85093-ea0d-44ca-bc9c-0fab5ac08fbc" /> [1]: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/59c06537d82fedd1916b7aeb808dc73904f6a751/quality_mrp_workorder/static/src/mrp_display/quality_check.js#L83-L86 [2]: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/59c06537d82fedd1916b7aeb808dc73904f6a751/mrp_workorder/static/src/mrp_display/mrp_record_line/quality_check.js#L147-L163 [3]: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/59c06537d82fedd1916b7aeb808dc73904f6a751/quality_mrp_workorder/models/quality.py#L86-L89 [4]: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/59c06537d82fedd1916b7aeb808dc73904f6a751/quality_mrp_workorder/models/quality.py#L48-L68 [5]: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/19.0/mrp_workorder/static/src/mrp_display/mrp_record_line/quality_check.js#L154-L161 opw-5403465 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#102095
This update fixes an issue where Modelo 390 reports for past years were generating empty BOE files. The fix ensures the report correctly uses the specified year's data, resolving a discrepancy between the report and the actual tax information. This improves the accuracy of tax reporting for Spanish companies.
Original PR description
### Issue: When exporting Modelo 390 reports for a past year, the BOE file was empty — all values were 0 ### Cause: In `export_boe()`, the `report_lines` were get based on the `section_report`…
### Issue: When exporting Modelo 390 reports for a past year, the BOE file was empty — all values were 0 ### Cause: In `export_boe()`, the `report_lines` were get based on the `section_report` options However, `section_reports` do not store the date or return periodicity of the selected report As a result, using their options always fetched data for the current period instead of the specified year ### Note: `_generate_mod_390_page2()` also had issues: some lines were missing or incorrectly indexed The mod 360 format, it strict in the structure with specific index so it may produce invalid documents The latest documentation for mod 390: https://sede.agenciatributaria.gob.es/static_files/Sede/Disenyo_registro/DR_300_399/archivos_25/dr390e2025.xlsx ### Steps to reproduce: - Install `l10n_es_reports` and switch to ES Company - Create an Invoice and a Bill (Any product, Price: 100.00, Tax: 21%, Invoice Date: 01/01/2025) - Open Tax Return, switch to Mod 390, and set year to 2025 - You should see data in the 2 first sections - Use the gear icon, and download the BOE - Use the gear icon to download the BOE, fill the wizard (Natural Person – Name: Test, Principal activity: Test, Activity Code: 12345), and generate the file Before the fix: all values in the BOE were 0 instead of matching the report opw-5457374 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#106676 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#104928
A recent page refresh issue was preventing the restaurant appointment tour from working correctly. This update refactors the tour to maintain a consistent simulated time, ensuring appointments remain visible and the tour functions as expected after a reload. This improves the user experience for restaurant bookings.
Original PR description
The `RestaurantAppointmentTour` fails when page refreshes reset the mock clock to system time, causing the frontend to filter out mock appointments and the tour to timeout. Refactor the tour to use the new `withTimeFreeze` helper, ensuring the simulated date persists across reloads so appointments remain visible. runbot-232601 Related Community PR: odoo/odoo#247596