Wednesday, February 18, 2026
13 changes · saas-18.3
Enhancements to existing features
This update enhances the accuracy of German retail tax calculations and improves order processing speed. Specifically, the system now correctly maps taxes and handles order lifecycle events (start, cancel, finish) more efficiently, leading to faster transaction times and more reliable data.
Original PR description
*: pos, pos_cert In this commit: ------------------ - The transactions were shown to be processed within 0-1 seconds as we were used to call start and finish transaction calls on validation so in the case of retails it won't give actual data of start and end time so we need to improve this and called now for `start transaction` when first orderline added to a new order, calling `cancelled` if the order is deleted or all the orderlines are removed manually, and `finished` on validation of the order. - we have also now handle correct tax mapping by backporting pr: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/pull/83300 and many other business cases are handled. task: 5184287 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#107509 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#99216
Resolved issues and error corrections
This update resolves an issue preventing standard payroll users from accessing the 'One-time payments' feature within Swiss company contracts. The fix allows payroll officers and managers to correctly open this functionality, ensuring proper processing of payroll data. This improves usability for key payroll operations.
Original PR description
Steps to reproduce: ------------------- 1. Install l10n_ch_hr_payroll_elm_transmission. 2. Switch to a Swiss company and create a new employee. 3. Create a new internal user with Payroll…
Steps to reproduce: ------------------- 1. Install l10n_ch_hr_payroll_elm_transmission. 2. Switch to a Swiss company and create a new employee. 3. Create a new internal user with Payroll Officer/Manager access. 4. Log in as that user, create a contract, and click on "One-time payments". Issue: --------- A Traceback with AccessError: ```You are not allowed to access 'Action Window' (ir.actions.act_window) records.``` Cause: ---------- https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/9e39b4b85fcb9f6ed5b21b942796b76b8a6eefdb/l10n_ch_hr_payroll_elm_transmission/models/hr_contract.py#L195 The code attempts to call `.read()` on an `ir.actions.act_window` record. Standard users typically do not have read access to window action records, resulting in an **AccessError** even if they have rights to the payroll data. Solution: ------------- Use [_for_xml_id](https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/93bd4d018d815b5f98d1eaaac3ae613aefbdba56/odoo/addons/base/models/ir_actions.py#L187) to return action content for the provided xml id in a safe way by doing [sudo](https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/93bd4d018d815b5f98d1eaaac3ae613aefbdba56/odoo/addons/base/models/ir_actions.py#L205) internally to bypass the access restriction. opw-5491467 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#106598
This update ensures that when creating expenses or sales orders, the associated account is correctly linked to the company being used. Previously, accounts were incorrectly tied to the main company, even when processing transactions for a different company. This fix improves data accuracy and prevents errors in financial reporting.
Original PR description
The aim of this commit is to ensure the account select through product is related to the correct company. (ie. the one related to the processed model) Before this commit: If a user has company_a selected as the main company in the company switcher and create an expense for company_b, the account selected from the product will be an account from company_a. (because product is shared between company but the account properties on those are company dependent) This could also happens in other places so we fixed it. After this commit: The account selected from the product will be from the company set on the model. task-4699717 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#249003 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#209144
This update resolves an issue where the public knowledge sidebar overlapped with article content on mobile devices. The fix ensures the sidebar functions as a proper mobile overlay, providing a cleaner and more consistent user experience when viewing knowledge articles on smartphones. This improves usability for mobile users.
Original PR description
Steps to reproduce: 1. Install `website_knowledge` 2. Create a long, scrollable knowledge article with 20 sub-articles. 3. Share the article publicly 4. Open the public link in mobile view (logged…
Steps to reproduce:
1. Install `website_knowledge`
2. Create a long, scrollable knowledge article with 20 sub-articles.
3. Share the article publicly
4. Open the public link in mobile view (logged out)
5. Toggle the sidebar using the top-left menu button
6. Scroll down
Issue:
- On mobile, the public sidebar overlaps with the article's content while scrolling.
Cause:
- the sidebar and its backdrop were positioned absolutely inside a flex container. Because they were not fixed to the viewport, the article content continued to scroll and render underneath the sidebar, causing visible overlap between the sidebar and the article body. Additionally, the sidebar’s internal scroll container was not explicitly positioned, which contributed to inconsistent scrolling behavior when the sidebar was open.
Solution:
- Update the public Knowledge sidebar css to behave as a proper mobile overlay by: Fixing the sidebar and its backdrop to the viewport using position: fixed, ensuring they are removed from the flex layout flow on mobile Explicitly positioning the sidebar’s internal scroll view to ensure correct scrolling behavior
<table>
<tr>
<td><strong>Before</strong></td>
<td><strong>After</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><img width="725" height="901" alt="Before image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/33190684-5b52-4931-b01a-5044734c9cf0" /></td>
<td><img width="686" height="916" alt="After image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/610a5aef-3467-4215-a0a0-83607375a016" /></td>
</tr>
</table>
opw-5384026
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#103135This update fixes an issue where CFDI refund XMLs were using a generic description instead of the original line description. The change ensures that refund details are accurately reflected in the CFDI documents, complying with Mexican tax regulations. This aligns with a previous update in version 19.0.
Original PR description
Steps to produce: --- - Install `accountant` and `l10n_mx` modules. - Switch to Mexican company. - In Settings, under `Authorized Certification Provider (PAC)`, set PAC to `Solución Factible`. -…
Steps to produce: --- - Install `accountant` and `l10n_mx` modules. - Switch to Mexican company. - In Settings, under `Authorized Certification Provider (PAC)`, set PAC to `Solución Factible`. - Create new invoice > set customer to `INMOBILIARIA CVA`, payment way to `Efectivo` and product as `Large Meeting table` > confirm the invoice. - Mark the invoice as global. - Register the payment. - Create a credit note and confirm it. - Click Send(make sure CFDI is checked) and check the generated XML. Issue: --- - The CFDI XML sets the `Descripcion` field to the default value `Devoluciones, descuentos o bonificaciones`. Solution: --- - Preserve the original line description for CFDI refunds instead of forcing the generic label. - For POS refunds, continue using the generic label. - This aligns with the fix introduced in 19.0([here]). Before: --- <img width="519" height="60" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/75066bdb-5fba-4959-bf16-8b2953bc40d5" /> After: --- <img width="615" height="56" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/bd93d0af-957f-47fc-b65c-3ec16c4b8f10" /> [here]: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/pull/97681/changes/515410ec45541e6c07f892a094bb0aa57f479436 **Backport of https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/pull/97681** opw-5870052 --- Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#107367
This update enhances the accuracy of payment reference validation by tailoring checks to the bank account's country. Previously, a single check applied to all countries could lead to incorrect validation. Now, the system verifies reference formats against the specific country of the bank account, with a fallback to a standard format if the country isn't supported.
Original PR description
Currently, when initiating a payment, we check if the reference is a structured one by using `is_valid_structured_reference` which checks the validity of the structure accross all supported countries. This can lead to issues when it matches formats accepted by other countries but not the one of the bank account. With this commit, we replace this check by a call to a new function that checks the structure validity according to the country of the bank account, with a fallback to the generic check (ISO 11649) if the country is not supported. opw-5387269 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#248926 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#248194
This update enhances the accuracy of payment reference checks by tailoring validation to the bank account's country. Previously, a single check applied to all countries could lead to incorrect validation. Now, the system verifies the reference format against the bank's country, with a fallback to a standard format for unsupported countries, ensuring payments are processed correctly.
Original PR description
Currently, when initiating a payment, we check if the reference is a structured one by using `is_valid_structured_reference` which checks the validity of the structure accross all supported countries. This can lead to issues when it matches formats accepted by other countries but not the one of the bank account. With this commit, we replace this check by a call to a new function that checks the structure validity according to the country of the bank account, with a fallback to the generic check (ISO 11649) if the country is not supported. opw-5387269 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#107589 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#107116
This update fixes an issue where the tax report (mod 390) was incorrectly displaying amounts twice for Spanish companies using the 0% EU G tax code. The fix corrects a misconfiguration in the tax template, ensuring accurate reporting of intra-community purchases. This ensures compliance with Spanish VAT regulations.
Original PR description
How to reproduce: - Install the l10n_es module - Switch to a spanish company - Confirm a Vendor Bill with a Product with the tax 0% EU G - Go to the Tax Report and select mod390 The problem: In the section "Adquisiciones intracomunitarias de bienes", the total amount is shown two time, once for grid 716 and once for grid 26 Why: In the declaration of the tax template for 0% EU G, there is two tags for the mod 390, the one for grid 26 being wrong Before: <img width="818" height="447" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/0565802d-5d98-4e0f-9e08-50776f0a5aec" /> After: <img width="834" height="443" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/89696c83-7022-439d-adaa-d456c2dbadf8" /> opw-5867849 --- I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#248682 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#247590
This update corrects a bug where a new Mexican invoice was automatically marked as 'public' (CFDI to Public) even when no customer was selected. The fix ensures this checkbox remains unchecked, preventing incorrect public disclosure of invoices. This ensures compliance with Mexican tax regulations.
Original PR description
Steps to produce: --- - Install `l10n_mx` and `accountant` modules. - Switch to a Mexican company. - Go to Accounting > Customers > Invoices. - Click on New to create a new invoice. Issue: --- - The `CFDI to Public` checkbox is automatically checked even when no customer is selected. Root cause: --- - Here at [1], the field l10n_mx_edi_partner_address_complete evaluates to False when no partner is set. - Due to the OR condition, this causes l10n_mx_edi_cfdi_to_public to be set to True, even though no partner has been selected yet. Solution: --- - We should only evaluate partner address completeness when a partner is explicitly set. - Also, add VAT check for `l10n_mx_edi_partner_address_complete`, as requested by mial(PO). [1] https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/cc00e8f3bb75b8c782fea3a42ad3bbcdbc240e2f/l10n_mx_edi/models/account_move.py#L649 opw-5911542 --- Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#106943
This update resolves an issue where grouped tax reports were inaccurate when invoices included both positive and negative tax amounts. The fix ensures that all tax line balances are considered, preventing errors in report generation. This improves the reliability of tax reporting within the system.
Original PR description
The grouped tax reports are broken if an invoice is created with 2 lines on 2 different income accounts. [A previous…
The grouped tax reports are broken if an invoice is created with 2 lines on 2 different income accounts. [A previous commit](https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/48d60151254045768d5aac1b29c5acf84b70cef2) modified the query responsible for the construction of the grouped reports. It only keeps the base lines of type entry which have a balance of the same sign as the tax line. Yet in our case, the CABA move is of type 'entry'. It has only one tax line with a positive amount because the taxes amounts on each line are added. But the balance of the negative line is negative. So the query will only consider the positive line hence the error. So now, the logic is only considering lines with the same sign to avoid entries where the invoice lines and the refund lines are both there. This is why it only checks for moves of type 'entry'. We also ignore the check for CABA moves, i.e. moves where `tax_cash_basis_origin_move_id` is defined. Steps to reproduce: - Activate Cash Basis in the Settings - Create a tax based on payment - Create an invoice with two lines: - One with a negative amount, an income account and the created tax - One with a positive amount big enough to compensate the previous line, a different income account and the same tax - Confirm - Click "Pay", validate the payment - In the Dashboard > Bank journal > Create a reconciliation of the amount of the invoice - Reconcile it with the invoice - Accounting > Reporting > Tax Return - Select "Group By: Account tax" Ticket [link](https://www.odoo.com/odoo/project.task/5089790) opw-5089790 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#239081
This update resolves an issue where grouped tax reports were generating incorrect results when invoices included both positive and negative tax amounts. The fix ensures that all tax lines, including those with negative balances (CABA moves), are properly considered during report generation. This ensures accurate tax reporting for cash basis accounting.
Original PR description
The grouped tax reports are broken if an invoice is created with 2 lines on 2 different income accounts. [A previous…
The grouped tax reports are broken if an invoice is created with 2 lines on 2 different income accounts. [A previous commit](https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/48d60151254045768d5aac1b29c5acf84b70cef2) modified the query responsible for the construction of the grouped reports. It only keeps the baselines of type 'entry' which have a balance of the same sign as the tax line. But in our case, the CABA move is of type 'entry'. It has only one tax line with a positive amount because the taxes amounts on each line are added. But the balance of the negative line is negative. So the query will only consider the positive line hence the error. So now, the logic of the only considering lines with the same sign is to avoid entries where the invoice lines and the refund lines are both there. This is why it only checks for moves of type 'entry'. We also ignore the check for CABA moves, i.e. moves where `tax_cash_basis_origin_move_id` is defined. Steps to reproduce: - Activate Cash Basis in the Settings - Create a tax based on payment - Create an invoice with two lines: - One with a negative amount, an income account and the created tax - One with a positive amount big enough to compensate the previous line, a different income account and the same tax - Confirm - Click "Pay", validate the payment - In the Dashboard > Bank journal > Create a reconciliation of the amount of the invoice - Reconcile it with the invoice - Accounting > Reporting > Tax Return - Select "Group By: Account tax" Community PR: odoo/odoo#239081 Ticket [link](https://www.odoo.com/odoo/project.task/5089790) opw-5089790 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#101601
This update reverses a recent change that was causing all upsell quotes to be canceled, disrupting business processes. The previous update incorrectly used a function that led to errors and prevented proper filtering of alternative quotes. This reversion restores the correct functionality for upsell quote management.
Original PR description
…mmit/55b6bbe27cc31abcaee40cd4a196e087fdfd4ce5 This commit introduced an issue. All upsell quote were canceled and no filtering was done on "alternative quotes". As a result it could disrupt legit business flow. Moreover, action_cancel was called instead of _action_cancell which can lead to ValueError: Expected singleton as action_cancel can require single record sometimes. Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#107503 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#107417
This update corrects a critical issue where Belgian UBL invoices were missing a required scheme ID, preventing proper invoice generation. The fix ensures compliance with industry standards (ISO 6523 ICD) for company registry information, improving the accuracy and validity of invoices for Belgian customers. This resolves a previous error and enhances the system's ability to process invoices correctly.
Original PR description
1) This commit adds the new generic methods to build an UBL file. The big objective is to remove the hierarchy of UBL later on and make BIS3 completely standalone. In this commit, BIS3 is not independent of UBL 2.1 & 2.0. 2) Missing schemeID for Belgium Company registry Since https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/d40652c17b43b6a9fd4d19ce84b943b2a51fad9c, in Belgium, we set by default the company registry. However the schemeID is missing and should be part of the ISO 6523 ICD list: https://docs.peppol.eu/poacc/billing/3.0/codelist/ICD/ 3) Fix PartyLegalEntity when the country is NL and there is no company registry/EAS/Endpoint That case was raising a traceback before this commit. --- I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#246377