Saturday, February 21, 2026
5 changes · saas-18.4
Resolved issues and error corrections
Hungarian companies could be blocked from saving production NAV credentials because Odoo sent an identifier that was one character too short. The update ensures the identifier always matches NAV's required length, allowing authentication and invoicing setup to proceed correctly.
Original PR description
**Steps to reproduce:** * Create a **Hungarian** database with **Accounting** or **Invoicing**. * Set a valid **VAT number** on the company. * Configure **NAV credentials** in **production mode**.…
**Steps to reproduce:**
* Create a **Hungarian** database with **Accounting** or **Invoicing**.
* Set a valid **VAT number** on the company.
* Configure **NAV credentials** in **production mode**. (use credentials from ticket)
* Try to save the Settings.
**Observed behavior:**
* Authentication fails with error: `INVALID_REQUEST: Helytelen kérés!`
* NAV returns schema violation: `Value 'BE477472701-19110' is not facet-valid with respect to pattern '[0-9A-Z\-]{18}' for type 'SoftwareIdType'.`
* The softwareId is only 17 characters instead of required 18.
**Cause:**
* The `version` parameter was removed from the module manifest by this [commit](https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/717619571d1297d6b299b7c47b728841bcd81e69#diff-d96ba04bb478d9dcbade7b9bf9f07305d42a38ce7a906f3387879271cde35fecL7)
* This change shortened the module version string used to build the `softwareId`.
* Truncating the value to 18 characters therefore produced a string shorter than required.
* The NAV API requires the `softwareId` to be **exactly 18 characters**.
**Fix:**
* Pad the generated `softwareId` to **18 characters** using `ljust(18, '0')`.
* Ensures the value always complies with NAV schema validation rules.
opw-5902414
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#247737Fixed an issue where invoices sent through Peppol could arrive without the embedded PDF if the PDF had already been generated by email. Peppol messages now consistently include the invoice PDF, helping recipients receive the complete invoice package.
Original PR description
**Steps to reproduce:** * Install `Accounting` and `accounting_peppol` modules. * Create Belgium company. * Go to accounting settings and activate PEPPOL under `PEPPOL Electronic Invoicing`. * Create…
**Steps to reproduce:** * Install `Accounting` and `accounting_peppol` modules. * Create Belgium company. * Go to accounting settings and activate PEPPOL under `PEPPOL Electronic Invoicing`. * Create and post a customer invoice. * Click **Send & Print**. * Select only **Email** and click **Send** to generate the PDF. * Click **Send & Print** again. * Select only **Peppol** (partner configured for Peppol). * Click **Send**. **Observed behavior:** * The invoice is sent via **Peppol**, but the generated UBL XML does **not** contain the embedded PDF. * The receiver gets the XML data without the PDF representation. **Cause:** * When a PDF already exists on the invoice, the send flow skips the document post-processing step to avoid regenerating it. * The PDF embedding into the UBL XML relies on this post-processing step. * Sending via Peppol after emailing the invoice therefore bypasses the PDF embedding logic. **Fix:** * When sending via **Peppol**, detect if a PDF already exists on the invoice. * If so, explicitly post-process the UBL XML to embed the existing PDF before sending. * Ensures the PDF is always included in Peppol messages, regardless of when it was generated. opw-5495465 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#245901
Fixes an issue where merged bill and refund payments could use the wrong beneficiary bank account. This helps ensure vendor payments are sent to the correct account when Odoo combines payment batches.
Original PR description
When we create new payments for bills and refunds, we offer the possibility to merge inbound and outbound payments together if they are from the same provider and the bills all reference the same…
When we create new payments for bills and refunds, we offer the possibility to merge inbound and outbound payments together if they are from the same provider and the bills all reference the same recipient account. Depending on the balance of the resulting payment, we assign an adequate inbound or outbound bank account as the recipient. The `partner_bank_id` can be assigned through different processes: - If the wizard has only one batch: The wizard is editable and the user can select a bank account from the computed `available_partner_bank_ids`. - If there are multiple batches: Odoo assigns a `partner_bank_id` in `_create_payment_vals_from_batch()`. For an outbound payment, it uses the batch['payment_values']['partner_bank_id']. The problem is that this value is not updated after a merge of payments. If the base line being merged on is a refund, but the result is an outbound payment, then the `partner_bank_id` should be changed accordingly. I decided to include the changes of my previous PR targeting v18 and fixing the grouping of payments, even though it was deemed unnecessary for v17, because it felt weird not to considering how close these fixes are. -Previous PR : [242863](https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/242863) However, I can remove these changes or re-target this PR to v18. I am not sure what would be best here. Ticket: opw-5401372 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#249537 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#246558
Romanian and Croatian e-invoicing no longer incorrectly applies Peppol BIS3 validation rules. This prevents invoices to private individuals from being blocked when an endpoint identifier is legitimately empty.
Original PR description
The CIUS RO and CIUS HR depends on the BIS3 which is fundamentally incorrect. This was probably made out of lazyness to redefine things that are almost the same in both these CIUS and the BIS3. Now, in previous PR [1], we added contraints for the Peppol BIS 3 that are impacting those formats. Indeed, the EndpointID can be empty in the context of CIUS RO and CIUS HR. In particular, it's breaking the sending to physical person at the moment. [1]: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/246961 opw-5943698 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#249089
This update ensures shift start and end times correctly reflect the selected shift template, even when employees have fixed schedules. Previously, shifts were incorrectly calculating hours based on employee schedules, leading to inaccurate time tracking. This change resolves a discrepancy and provides more reliable shift scheduling.
Original PR description
__ ## Short functional explanation of the error Let's say we create a role containing employees with fixed schedules. Then, we create a shift template that applies on this role. When we create a…
__ ## Short functional explanation of the error Let's say we create a role containing employees with fixed schedules. Then, we create a shift template that applies on this role. When we create a shift, the starting and ending hours will take into consideration the hours of the employee's fixed schedule, instead of aligning with the shift template start and end hours. As discussed with XBO, the start and end hours of the shift should align with the shift template, despite the fixed working schedules having different start and end hours. ## Reproduction Steps 1. Go to Planning. Click on Configuration tab > roles. 2. Create a role and add an employee as a resource This employee has to have a fixed working schedule. 3. Click on Configuration tab > Shift Templates. 4. Create a new Shift Template. Select starting and ending hours different from the employee's fixed schedule. Select the role you just created. 5. Click on Schedule tab > By resource and click on New. 6. Select the role you just created. ### Expected behavior The start and end hours should align with the shift template start and end hours. ### Unexpected behavior The start and end hours are aligned on the employee's fixed working schedule: if the employee has a schedule from 8 to 16h36 and the shift template goes from 10 to 18, the starting and ending hours will be 10 to 16h36. ## Origin of the issue We kept computing the working intervals of employees, even if a shift template was set: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/8b00363e5e461f11b9736354d94e520e21932e71/planning/models/planning.py#L656-L664 Which isn't necessary in the case where a shift template has been set, as the start and end time are determined by the shift template, and not the employee's schedule. __ opw-5898509 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#107018