Steps to reproduce:
- Install `l10n_co_dian` module(demo data) > Switch to `CO Company`
- Settings > Colombian Electronic Invoicing > Change the Operation Mode: `DIAN 2.1: Support Documents`(eg: [Image](https://www.awesomescreenshot.com/image/58874464?key=0cb74e446dcdb0f087df6ed619f785c2))
- Vendors > Create a Bill > Confirm > `Acknowledge Reception`

Traceback:
```py
 File "/home/odoo/src/enterprise/saas-19.1/l10n_co_dian/models/account_move.py", line 293, in l10n_co_dian_send_event_update_status_received
    self._l10n_co_dian_send_event_update_status('received')
  File "/home/odoo/src/enterprise/saas-19.1/l10n_co_dian/models/account_move.py", line 313, in _l10n_co_dian_send_event_update_status
    document = self.env['l10n_co_dian.document']._send_commercial_event(self, commercial_state_next)
  File "/home/odoo/src/enterprise/saas-19.1/l10n_co_dian/models/l10n_co_dian_document.py", line 593, in _send_commercial_event
    xml, errors = self.env['account.edi.xml.ubl_dian']._export_co_send_event_update_status_invoice(locked_move, commercial_state_next)
  File "/home/odoo/src/enterprise/saas-19.1/l10n_co_dian/models/account_edi_xml_ubl_dian.py", line 1208, in _export_co_send_event_update_status_invoice
    return self.with_context(l10n_co_next_commercial_state=next_commercial_state)._dian_sign_xml(xml, invoice)
  File "/home/odoo/src/enterprise/saas-19.1/l10n_co_dian/models/account_edi_xml_ubl_dian.py", line 1524, in _dian_sign_xml
    'software_security_code': self._dian_get_security_code(operation_mode, document_number),
  File "/home/odoo/src/enterprise/saas-19.1/l10n_co_dian/models/account_edi_xml_ubl_dian.py", line 1443, in _dian_get_security_code
    operation_mode.dian_software_id
TypeError: unsupported operand type(s) for +: 'int' and 'str'
```

We are getting this error because `_dian_get_operation_mode` [returns] an empty `l10n_co_dian.operation_mode()` record. This happens when the `Operation modes` do not match. As a result, [operation_mode] also contains an empty record.

[operation_mode]: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/84022deef3414096fcaf61f8d45c08393431e0ab/l10n_co_dian/models/account_edi_xml_ubl_dian.py#L1432

[returns]: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/84022deef3414096fcaf61f8d45c08393431e0ab/l10n_co_dian/models/account_edi_xml_ubl_dian.py#L1394-L1400

sentry-7273771732

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#107885

Problems:
-------
1. For a new employee, with a contract starting in the current month but before today:
in the payslip for the current month number of days of attendance and days of out of contract
are not correct

Same for an employee, with a contract ending in the current month (before today)

2. In both cases above worked entries are not generated correctly
(from today to the end of month)

3. Additional bug:
If we create an employee with no contract and create a payslip draft for him
for the current month, work entries with type "Attendance" will be created

Objective:
---------
Problems 1 and 2 :
date_version was equal to today (date of the employee's creation),
so number of attendance days was calculated as
( end_of_payslip_month - today ) or ( today - start_of_payslip_month )

Problem 3 :
Work entries are generated even when there is no active contract

Solution:
---------
Problems 1 and 2: This commit adds an additional part (already exists in v19) in the method
write() of hr.version which sets date_version = contract_date_start

Problem 3: by generating work entries check if contract_date_start is filled

Tests ware added in odoo/hr: test_hr_version.py
and in enterprise/hr_payroll:
test_new_employee_worked_days, test_payslip_empty_contract.py

task-5430759

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#251264
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#241978

### Steps to Reproduce:
1. Go to Accounting > Create a journal.
2. Archive the company’s default income/expense or cash diff. accounts.
3. Change the journal type.
3. Observe that an archived account is assigned by the onchange method.

### Issue:
- Prior to saas-18.3, no onchange logic existed for assigning default accounts. With the introduction of the [onchange]
(https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/334a8161cd2feb092cafedc35d94645900b40518) , archived income/expense or default cash diff. accounts can be assigned to journals.
- This creates an inconsistency, as the domain [defined] (https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/saas-18.3/addons/account/models/account_journal.py#L70-#L82) for `default_account_id` only returns active accounts.

### Solution:
- Since the domain for `default_account_id` returns only active accounts, this commit aims to update the onchange [logic](https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/saas-18.3/addons/account/models/account_journal.py#L540-#L551) in order to follow the same restriction, ensuring that only active accounts are assigned thereby preventing inconsistent behavior.

OPW-5501539

Description of the issue/feature this PR addresses:

Current behavior before PR:

Desired behavior after PR is merged:




---
I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#246725

Currently, editing a posted `miscellaneous` journal entry in Chile 
localization incorrectly raises a validation error.

**Steps to reproduce:**
- Install the `l10n_cl` module and switch to the `CL company`.
- Go to Accounting > Accounting > Journal Entries.
- Create a balanced entry using the `Miscellaneous journal `and `post` it.
- Reset it to draft, modify the `name`, and try to `save` it.

**Observation:**
`Validation error`: `The DTE document number (folio) must contain only digits.`

**Root cause:**
At [1], the constraint validation is applied to all journal entries in 
Chilean companies, including `miscellaneous` journals. However, 
`miscellaneous journals (move_type = 'entry')` are not linked to Chilean 
electronic documents, so the numeric folio validation should not apply to them.

**Fix:**
This commit ensures that the validation is not raised for `miscellaneous` journal 
types by excluding miscellaneous journals from the numeric folio validation constraint.

[1]:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/f39785bcddd1eb5b7fb503d053c9bb66e2a0f15c/addons/l10n_cl/models/account_move.py#L20-L30

opw-5926773

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#248965

When opening an SO in POS that has a product tracked by lot that is split into several location, the lot number will only appear in one of the line and not the others

Steps to reproduce:
-------------------
1. Create a Product A tracked by lot, create lot 111 and add 1 unit to location A and another one to location B
1. Create a sales order
2. Add two units of the product to the sale order
3. Confirm the sales order
4. Open the transfer, make the transfer retrieve the product from several location with the same lot.
5. Save the transfer
6. Open the sales order in POS
7. Load the SN/lots
-> Two line of qty 1 appear for the product A but only the first one has the lot number

Additional Issue:
8. Change the number of the product for the first line to 2 and erase the second line
9. Confirm and Pay
10. Close POS
11. Open move lines for this product (Inventory>product>In/out)
-> It moves 2 product from one location (when there is only product)

Observation:
-------------
When loading the SO in POS, we will retrieve the SO: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/cb1f5d9c6db64b9ace9b7aa46bd6f94e4462176b/addons/pos_sale/static/src/app/order_management_screen/sale_order_management_screen/sale_order_management_screen.js#L104 While retrieving the SO, we will also retrieve the SOL, with additional information: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/d9b2e5ee730a4e79586bfd3f09adfb794d2dc1f3/addons/pos_sale/models/sale_order.py#L79 -> Issue is that when several moves_line have the sale lot_id.name, their quantity will be overwritten.

Addition Issue :
When closing pos, all the move will be processed, when processing those moves, the origin only check if the quantity is more than 0 and not if there is enought units. https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/cb1f5d9c6db64b9ace9b7aa46bd6f94e4462176b/addons/point_of_sale/models/stock_picking.py#L293-L297

opw-5347992

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#251270
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#243347

Steps to Reproduce  
------------------  
1. Open the Planning Gantt view.
2. Click a cell that belongs to a resource with **no** scheduled shifts.  
3. The Plan dialog opens with an empty list.  
  
Issue  
-----  
A previous change  keeps the clicked resource in the dialog context; the Gantt 
model turns it into a default search filter, so only shifts already linked to 
that resource are shown. Unassigned shifts are therefore hidden, preventing 
planners from assigning them by role or availability.  
  
Current Behaviour  
-----------------  
The Plan dialog is always filtered by `resource_id`, which returns no results 
for unscheduled resources, even when they have the right roles.
  
Expected Behaviour  
------------------  
The dialog should list all unscheduled shifts that match the resource’s roles, 
or every unscheduled shift if the resource has no roles, while still preserving
full context for scheduling once a shift is selected.  
  
Fix  
---  
Remove the automatic resource filter from the dialog context in 
`getSelectCreateDialogProps()`. This prevents the unwanted search restriction; 
role defaults remain, so the dialog now displays the correct shifts.  
  
Task-4922525  
Issue – https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/pull/87424/commits/a218a7cedce61f992fbe76284c273be8f937d28d

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#92100