Daily updates from Odoo
Monday, March 23, 2026
8 changes · saas-18.2
Resolved issues and error corrections
This update fixes a bug that prevented users from adding reactions to messages within the 'mail_group' module in Discuss. The fix ensures the 'add reaction' button isn't displayed for message types that don't inherit from the standard message structure, improving stability and usability.
Original PR description
Steps to reproduce: - Install the mail_group module - Open Discuss - Go to the History tab - Add a reaction on a message that has model mail.group - Throws an error The error occurs because the mail.group model does not implement the `_get_allowed_access_params()` method, which is invoked during the process here. Actually, the "add reaction" button should not be shown on messages whose model does not inherit from mail.thread. This commit fixes the issue by hiding the "add reaction" button on messages with models that don’t inherit from mail.thread, such as `mail.group`. community: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/218615 Task-5098050
This update resolves an issue where the CFDI payment method '99' was incorrectly displayed as 'False' in reports. The fix ensures that '99 - Por definir' is shown accurately, aligning with Mexican tax regulations. This ensures correct reporting for invoices generated with the mx company.
Original PR description
**PROBLEM** PR https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/commit/843d57b25f925a5d4f1848b85717adb4d1a9d388 Archives payment method 99, but because it's archived `_l10n_mx_edi_get_extra_invoice_report_values()` doesn't retrieve it. This leads the pdf report to display '99 - False' instead of '99 - Por definir'. **STEP TO REPRODUCE** 1. Create an invoice with the mx company. 2. Set the due date sometime in the month later. (To have the PPD payment policy on the invoice). 3. Send and generate the invoice using cfdi. opw-5927655 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#111051 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#107267
This update resolves an issue where the XML generated for Swiss payments (iso20022_ch) was using an outdated payment schema. The fix ensures the XML adheres to current Swiss banking standards, improving payment processing accuracy and compliance. It also includes enhancements for validator schema and QR-IBAN support.
Original PR description
**PROBLEM** According to documentation (https://www.six-group.com/dam/download/banking-services/standardization/sps/ig-credit-transfer-sps-2025-en.pdf) PstlAdr must be structured. This isn't the case when generating a xml for the payment method iso20022_ch. **STEP TO REPRODUCE** 1. install l10n_ch and account_iso20022. 2. Create a swiss contact with a full address. And activate payment on the bank account of this contact. 3. Select the Company CH, and set a bank account in the bank journal configuration. 4. Create a vendor payment to the swiss contact. 5. Create a batch payment with it, and validate to get the xml. 6. Open the xml, and notice the PstlAdr isn't structured. Ticket [link](https://www.odoo.com/odoo/project.task/5880247) opw-5880247 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#107025
This update automatically calculates and transmits the required commission payments (ELM) for Swiss payroll, streamlining the process for our Swiss clients. The change ensures accurate reporting to Swiss tax authorities, reducing the risk of errors and improving compliance. This update impacts the Swiss payroll module.
Original PR description
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#111143
This update ensures that changes to a subscription's salesperson are automatically reflected for all associated contacts. Previously, updates only applied to the company partner, leading to inconsistencies. This change improves data accuracy and reduces the need for manual updates, streamlining the portal experience.
Original PR description
Before this commit, changing the salesperson on a subscription only updated the company partner, leaving child contacts with outdated salesperson info. After this commit, updating the subscription's salesperson also updates all child contacts of the company, ensuring consistency across the portal and reducing manual work. An unit test was added to ensure this behavior. task-5917271 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#108339
This update fixes a technical error that prevented the generation of the 281.10 report for Belgian payroll companies. The issue stemmed from a missing vehicle ID in the payslip data, which was resolved by recalculating the necessary information. This ensures accurate report generation.
Original PR description
[FIX] l10n_be_payroll: fix traceback in 281.10 sheets
Bug reproduction: Go to any version>=17.0 -> select belgium company -> install only belgium payroll (don't install fleet one) -> fill in niss, certification level, address, Time in R&D -> generate payslip and confirm it -> try to generate 281.10 report -> traceback
Bug cause:
1 - In traceback it was saying payslip doesn't have vehicle_id, in 281.10 sheet preparation (in function _get_atn_nature), there is a term like that
2 - Payslip doesn't have it because fleet module is not there.
Bug solution:
1 - Instead of checking the payslip has vehicle like that, we calculated it by using paylsip line_ids
2 - If the code ATN.CAR is there and the total of it is not zero, which means this payslip has a vehicle indeed.
task - 6037206
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#110860This update fixes an issue where repositioning PDF signs within the Odoo interface caused erratic resizing behavior due to multiple event listeners. The change ensures only one resize listener is attached per sign, resulting in a more reliable and predictable resizing experience for users. This enhances the overall usability of the PDF sign functionality.
Original PR description
Previously, repositioning a sign item inside the PDF iframe would attach multiple resize event listeners. This led to inconsistent and unintuitive resizing behavior. This commit ensures that only a single resize listener is registered per item, avoiding duplicated handlers and restoring stable interaction. task-6048759 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#111146
This update fixes an issue in how tax reports calculate period boundaries, particularly when using 'trimester' tax periods. The change ensures accurate reporting by correctly identifying the relevant tax period for calculations, preventing incorrect values being displayed in reports. This improves the reliability of financial reporting.
Original PR description
To reproduce the issue: - Setup tax periodicity to "trimester" - Create a report evaluating something with previous_tax_period date_scope (real cases tend to do that for carryover ; see monthly…
To reproduce the issue: - Setup tax periodicity to "trimester" - Create a report evaluating something with previous_tax_period date_scope (real cases tend to do that for carryover ; see monthly Italian tax report for an example) - Create the appropriate data so that in the current trimester, the report line evaluates to 42, and to 1 in the previous trimester - Open the report for the second month of the trimester => The line has value 42, while it should have 1. This happens because the date bounds for previous_tax_period were computed too naively, considering the date_from was always the first day of the tax period. The first day of the second month of the trimester, it's not the case, and we return the period boundaries of the day before that day. That day is the last day of the first month of the trimester, but belongs to the same trimester, so it's the same tax period. Therefore, we display the value of the current tax period, which is wrong. Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#111330 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#110504