Wednesday, March 25, 2026
16 changes · saas-18.4
Resolved issues and error corrections
Public website visitors could sometimes see a 404 error when opening records such as blog posts if access rules depended on the current website. This fix ensures website-aware access checks work earlier in the request flow, so valid public content remains reachable without requiring login.
Original PR description
\* = test_website_modules ### Issue: When accessing a record from the website without logging in, a `404` error occurs if a public record rule filters records by website related domain, for example…
\* = test_website_modules
### Issue:
When accessing a record from the website without logging in, a `404`
error occurs if a public record rule filters records by website related
domain, for example `[('website_id', '=', website.id)]`.
### Steps to reproduce:
- Install the 'website_blog' module and create at least one website.
- Enable debug mode.
- Go to Settings > Technical > Database Structure > Models.
- Open the `blog.post` model.
- Go to the 'Record Rules' tab.
- For the record 'Blog Post: public: published only', change the domain
from `[('website_published', '=', True)]` to
`[('website_id', '=', website.id)]`.
- Go to Website > Configuration > Blogs.
- Open a blog (e.g., Travel).
- Select 'My Website' in its 'Website' field.
- Open 'My Website' without logging in.
- Click on the 'Blog' menu and the blog listing will appear correctly.
- Try opening a blog post and a `404` error occurs.
### Reason:
<pre>
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Request Lifecycle │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ │
│ User Request (not logged in) │
│ ↓ │
│ ┌──────────────────────────────────────┐ │
│ │ 1. _pre_dispatch │ │
│ │ ↓ │ │
│ │ check_access_rule │ │
│ │ ↓ │ │
│ │ _eval_context (compute domain) │ │
│ │ ↓ │ │
│ │ get_request_website() │ │
│ │ ↓ │ │
│ │ request.website = None │ ← Issue │
│ │ ↓ │ │
│ │ Domain evaluation FAILS │ │
│ │ ↓ │ │
│ │ Access DENIED → 404 Error │ │
│ └──────────────────────────────────────┘ │
│ ↓ │
│ ┌──────────────────────────────────────┐ │
│ │ 2. _frontend_pre_dispatch │ │
│ │ (NEVER REACHED) │ │
│ │ ↓ │ │
│ │ request.website initialized ✓ │ ← Too Late │
│ └──────────────────────────────────────┘ │
│ │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
</pre>
Because `request.website` is initialized later in
`_frontend_pre_dispatch`, access rules evaluated earlier in
`_pre_dispatch` cannot rely on website context. As a result, record
rules depending on `website_id` are evaluated before `request.website`
is available, incorrectly denying access to public records.
### Fix:
Avoid totally relying on `get_request_website` during access rule
evaluation. Use the `request.is_frontend` attribute as a fallback, which
is set earlier, to detect frontend requests and ensure correct access
handling.
task-[4758311](https://www.odoo.com/odoo/project/974/tasks/4758311)
---
I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#213143Point of Sale receipt printing now uses the correct QR code for each order instead of reusing a previous one. This helps ensure printed receipts link to the right invoice information, especially for Spanish VeriFactu POS compliance flows.
Original PR description
**Step to reproduce:** - install "l10n_es_edi_verifactu_pos" - setup "ePOS printer" for a pos - open pos and settle a order below 400$ - notice we get l10n_es_edi_verifactu_qr_code in our receipt -…
**Step to reproduce:** - install "l10n_es_edi_verifactu_pos" - setup "ePOS printer" for a pos - open pos and settle a order below 400$ - notice we get l10n_es_edi_verifactu_qr_code in our receipt - click on "Print receipt" - repeat above steps for one more order **Observation:** - when we print the second order receipt, the QR still points to 1 order invoice **Issue:** - [getCacheKey](https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/0cee3350df09b06af77c879f0eba74bf6a8dd2c9/addons/point_of_sale/static/src/app/utils/html-to-image.js#L351C10-L355 ) was trimming query strings when generating cache keys. URLs like: ` http://localhost:9000/report/barcode/?barcode_type=QR&value=... ` were reduced to: ` http://localhost:9000/report/barcode/` - As a result, different QR code requests shared the same cache key. Subsequent requests reused the previously cached image instead of fetching a new one, producing incorrect QR codes for different orders. **Solution:** Add an `includeQueryParams` flag to `resourceToDataURL` so the full URL, including query parameters, is used as the cache key when needed. This ensures unique QR code URLs are cached and fetched correctly. opw-5455807 --- I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#251139
Regular users can now complete Polish KSeF e-invoicing actions without being blocked by administrator-only company and certificate settings. This reduces interruptions in invoice processing while keeping the sensitive configuration restricted.
Original PR description
Fields on `res_company` related to KSeF are marked only for group `base.group_system`, as are the `certificate.certificate` and `certificate.key` models. Adding `compute_sudo` and `sudo()` calls where it's needed in actions that can be performed by non-admin users. task-6018713 --- I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#253336
This fix stops users from assigning security groups to inherited views through the Groups settings screen, which could create invalid configurations. It helps prevent confusing upgrade errors and keeps view access rules consistent with Odoo's intended setup process.
Original PR description
**Steps to Reproduce:** - Create a new database. - Install any module (for example, Payroll). - Go to Settings → Technical → Security → Groups. - Open any group and assign an inherited view in the…
**Steps to Reproduce:** - Create a new database. - Install any module (for example, Payroll). - Go to Settings → Technical → Security → Groups. - Open any group and assign an inherited view in the Views section. - Upgrade the module. **Issue:** - Odoo already prevents assigning groups directly on inherited view records in ir.ui.view. However, it is still possible to indirectly assign groups to inherited views through res.groups via the view_access relation. - This creates entries in ir_ui_view_group_rel and can trigger a ValidationError during module upgrades. As a result, users may unknowingly create invalid group-view relations, leading to errors and confusion. **Solution:** - Add a validation constraint on res.groups to prevent linking groups to inherited views via the view_access relation. - Raise a ValidationError when such an assignment is attempted, with the message: "Groups should instead be defined using the 'groups' attribute inside the view XML definition." This ensures that inherited views cannot be assigned to groups, avoiding invalid configurations and preventing errors during module upgrades. **opw-6015526** --- I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#255411 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#254849
Google address autocomplete now works when address forms use split street fields, such as street name and street number. This improves address entry in contacts and e-commerce checkout, and better matches Google results to existing city records.
Original PR description
_= base,base_address_extended,google_address_autocomplete,website_sale_autocomplete The Google autocomplete feature was breaking when modules such as base_extended_address modified the address form (e.g., replacing street with street_name, street_number, etc.). In this commit: --- - Add the Google autocomplete widget to street-related fields. - Also same thing handled in frontened (e-commerce address autocomplete). - and update 'city_id' from available cities records if matches with google result. - ```update access_rights for RecCity Model - grant read access to public user``` --- task-5382984 opw-5362597 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#238672
Italian delivery documents now split the sale value correctly across kit components instead of showing the full sale value on each component line. This prevents overstated delivery summaries and makes printed DDT documents more accurate for customers and internal records.
Original PR description
Steps to reproduce: - Have an IT company setup - Create a product with a Sales Price and define a kit BOM with 2 components - Create SO with product - Confirm, go to delivery, validate - Print Issue: In the delivery DDT, there is a summary of the delivery where each item has its own entry (product, quantity, value). However, in case of kit BOM, each component is reported with the full value of the sale operation. Analysis: This occurs because in the report code we don't consider the possibility of kit products, where multiple components are associated to the same sale line. Ticket [link](https://www.odoo.com/odoo/project.task/5013606) opw-5013606 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#255435 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#224103
This fixes an error that could block users from creating backorders while validating batch transfers. Businesses can now complete partial batch deliveries more reliably without being stopped by an incorrect incompatibility warning.
Original PR description
Scenario: - Create two pickings with same partner with at least two moves each, the picking type should have auto_group and auto_confirm - Add to a batch transfer - Change the quantity on a move line, unlink the other - Validate the batch ### Before this PR - Clicking "create backorder" the "incompatible types" error appear because tries to assign the batch currently validating to the backorder picking ### After this PR - No error appear --- I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#251952
Invoices sent through Danish Nemhandel now use the company’s registered EAN/GLN identifier when the invoice is addressed to an individual contact linked to that company. This prevents invoices from falling back to the VAT number and helps ensure electronic invoices are routed to the correct recipient.
Original PR description
**STEP TO REPRODUCE** 1. install l10n_dk_nemhandel, and activate nemhandel. 2. Create a company partner, with a EAN/GLN as the nemhandel id. 3. Create an individual partner linked to the company partner. 4. Create an invoice with this individual partner. 5. Send the invoice with nemhandel. 6. open the xml file, and notice that the EndpointID doesn't use the EAN/GLN of the company partner. (It falls back to the VAT instead). opw-5945440 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#251783
Calendar invitation emails now avoid direct action links that can be triggered by automated email scanners. Recipients are taken to a confirmation page where they must actively accept or decline, preventing meetings from being wrongly cancelled or accepted without their input.
Original PR description
Mails are sent to users containing an acceptation and cancellation link that accepts GET requests but performs an action on visit Some mail defender software analyzes urls in links by actually visiting the URL. This leads to both actions being triggered without user input. Instead we now send buttons with a neutralizing parameter in the mail. Recipients may then visit the url and click a form button to "accept" or "decline". As these are post requests, the email bots should avoid clicking them. task-4555579 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#255675 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#198560
Fixes an issue where opening the custom snippets area in the website editor could fail after map-related snippets were saved under different Google Maps setup states. The editor now skips custom snippets whose original base snippet is unavailable, avoiding confusing errors for website editors.
Original PR description
Steps to reproduce: 1. Go to the website editor (ensure developer mode is off) 2. Drag and drop a Map snippet onto the page 3. Click on the newly placed snippet and save it as a custom snippet 4.…
Steps to reproduce: 1. Go to the website editor (ensure developer mode is off) 2. Drag and drop a Map snippet onto the page 3. Click on the newly placed snippet and save it as a custom snippet 4. Enable developer mode and refresh the website editor 5. Add a new Google Map snippet to the page a. The Google Map snippet is the one where the icon shows a map with a pin on the **left side**. 6. In the wizard, enter your valid API key and click Save a. Alternatively, you can use Odoo inspector to write any string into the `google_maps_api_key` field of the `website` model to simulate the above 7. Disable developer mode and refresh the website editor 8. Click one of the categories in the editor side panel to open the snippets browser 9. Click into the 'Custom' snippets category 10. Observe the error Depending on whether or not you have a Google Maps API key configured on your website, either the `s_map` or `s_google_map` base snippet will be disabled/hidden. When a user has created custom snippets out of the disabled base snippet, you will recieve the error mentioned above when the snippet browser attempts to load in these custom snippets, as it will be unable to load the base snippet. To fix this, we check if an original snippet was found when loading in a custom snippet. If not, we will not load in the custom snippet to avoid confusion. This error does not occur in Developer Mode, as both base snippets are always enabled in this case. Aditionally, we also clarify which snippet is the Google Map snippet to avoid confusion for the user when creating custom snippets. opw-5933787 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#250236
Manual payments made with Stripe SEPA Direct Debit now remain active while Stripe is still processing them, instead of being canceled immediately. This prevents invoices and subscriptions from incorrectly appearing unpaid when the payment is only pending confirmation.
Original PR description
**Problem:** When manually registering a payment using a Stripe SEPA Direct Debit token, the associated `account.payment` is immediately canceled, even though the Stripe transaction is in "Pending"…
**Problem:** When manually registering a payment using a Stripe SEPA Direct Debit token, the associated `account.payment` is immediately canceled, even though the Stripe transaction is in "Pending" status. Later, when Stripe confirms the transaction, the payment remains canceled, leading to subscription closures after 90 days of apparent non-payment. **Steps to reproduce:** 1) Set a customer address to Belgium and add a SEPA Direct Debit payment token via Stripe. 2) Change the company currency to euro. 4) Create a manual invoice for that customer. 5) Pay the invoice using the pre-configured Stripe SEPA token. 6) Observe the `account.payment` is immediately canceled despite the transaction being "Pending". 7) When Stripe confirms the transaction, the payment stays canceled. **Cause:** In `account_payment.action_post()`, after sending the payment request, all payments whose transaction state was not `done` were canceled. For asynchronous payment methods like SEPA Direct Debit, the transaction starts in `pending` (not `done`), so the payment was wrongly canceled. **Solution:** - Only cancel payments whose transaction ended in a failure state (not in `done`, `pending`, or `authorized`), so pending/authorized payments stay in draft/in_process. opw-5934381 --- I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#253876
This update resolves an issue where the AEAT tax report file was being rejected due to an incorrect date format. The fix ensures the file includes a default date ('00000000') when the procuration date is not specified, aligning with AEAT's requirements and allowing successful file uploads.
Original PR description
Steps to reproduce: - Install the `l10n_es_reports` module and switch to the `ES company`. - Go to Invoices and create an invoice with taxes, then confirm it. - Navigate to Accounting > Reporting >…
Steps to reproduce: - Install the `l10n_es_reports` module and switch to the `ES company`. - Go to Invoices and create an invoice with taxes, then confirm it. - Navigate to Accounting > Reporting > Tax Report. - From the smart button, select `Report: Tax Report (Mod 390) (ES)` and choose the year as `This Financial Year`. - Download the `BOE` file using the dropdown and fill the wizard fields (e.g., Natural Person – Name: Test, Principal activity: Test, Activity Code: 12345). - Upload the generated .txt file to the AEAT portal. (AEAT credentials are required) **Observation:** AEAT rejects the file with: `Caracteres no válidos '4. Representante - Personas Jurídicas - Represent. 1 - Fecha Poder (DDMMAAAA)'` **Root cause:** At [1], when `judicial_person_procuration_date` is `false`, an empty string is written to the BOE file, resulting in blank spaces in the exported file. This does not comply with AEAT’s required numeric format and causes the file to be rejected. **Fix:** This commit ensures the file contains '00000000' when `judicial_person_procuration_date` is false, complying with AEAT numeric format requirements. [1]: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/45d3a537c3b2eaccee425d959e89d26229e376cd/l10n_es_reports/models/aeat_tax_reports.py#L1696 opw-5995290 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#109652
This update corrects an issue preventing Romanian SAFT reports from passing validation. The team restored a key data element and used the correct, sanitized bank account number, ensuring compliance with Romanian tax regulations. This resolves a technical problem impacting report accuracy and usability.
Original PR description
Problem --------- In odoo/odoo#184131 and odoo/enterprise#72206, UOM's categories where removed. Along side the removal, the Description tag in the Romanian SAFT UOM table tag. However, without this node, the SAFT is flagged as invalid by validator in Romanian. Furthermore, in the RO SAF-T, we use the bank account number and not the sanitized one, which may lead to some spaces in the document. Spaces that are not accepted either. Solution --------- Add back the Description node and use the UOM name instead of category. Use the sanitized account number. opw-5956277 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#111664
This update fixes an issue where project budget totals were incorrectly summing expense and revenue amounts. The fix ensures that expenses and revenue budgets are calculated and displayed accurately within the project dashboard, providing a more precise view of project financial status. This improves reporting accuracy and helps users manage project budgets effectively.
Original PR description
### Steps to reproduce: - Create a billable project - Create two budgets one expense and the other revenue or both each for 100$ - Create a vendor bill with the analytic account of the created project - Notice in the project dashboard the two budgets are summed up in the total ### Cause: When calculating the total spent and total allocated we add up the amount whether it is an expense or revenue. https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/1dccb87a48ac44735da4c78594e37d4783789cd6/project_account_budget/models/project.py#L120-L121 ### Fix: Set the expense budget to -ve and the revenue/both to +ve amount when calculating the total spent and total allocated opw-5488131 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#106504
This update corrects a legal issue where certain invoice PDFs generated by the l10n_gt_edi module were missing required tax complements. The fix ensures that all invoices for document types FCAM, FCAP, and FESP now include these complements in the PDF format, complying with legal requirements. This prevents potential compliance problems.
Original PR description
**PROBLEM** For some documents types, the "complementos" are not present in the pdf while they are present in the xml. It's legally required that they are added in the pdf. **STEP TO REPRODUCE** 1. Install l10n_gt_edi. 2. Create an customer invoice. 3. Set the document type to FCAM, FCAP, or FESP. 4. Send the invoice using the cfdi. 5. download the xml and the pdf, notice the complementos are in the xml, but not in the pdf. opw-5970285 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#109061
This update corrects an issue where ISO20022 files generated for Swiss companies were being incorrectly formatted, leading to bank rejections. The fix ensures the correct 'PAIN 09' version is used, resolving compatibility problems and allowing successful file transmission to banks. This upgrade dynamically updates existing databases to maintain compliance.
Original PR description
To reproduce the issue:
- Create a database in 17.0, with a Swiss company, and install account_sepa. Make sure the bank journal uses the Swiss IS020022 PAIN version.
- Migrate this database to 18.0
- Generate an ISO20022 xml file for the Swiss company
==> The file is wrongly formatted, and will be rejected by the bank.
This happens because the sepa_pain_version field of the journal is still set to its old selection value ('pain.001.001.03.ch.02') after migration, which is not supported anymore. The ORM hence returns an empty value when accessing the selection field, and does not enter the proper conditions when generating the file.
An upgrade fix has been made here https://github.com/odoo/upgrade/pull/9771. This commit makes sure already-migrated databases dynamically fix the issue as well.
opw-6060612
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#111949