Monday, March 30, 2026
10 changes · saas-18.3
Resolved issues and error corrections
This update corrects an issue where modifying a recurring event's start time caused duplicate events to be created in Outlook, leading to incorrect meeting notifications. The fix ensures Microsoft IDs are preserved when the base event is an exception, resolving this duplication problem and improving Outlook synchronization.
Original PR description
When an attendee syncs a recurring event where the first occurrence (base event) was modified by the organizer, `_write_from_microsoft` falsely triggers the destructive recreation path. This happens because `_has_base_event_time_fields_changed` compares the exception's modified time against the seriesMaster's pattern time, detecting a "change" even though the master hasn't changed. This causes: - All non-base events lose their microsoft_id and ms_universal_event_id - The base event gets recreated without Microsoft IDs - A duplicate event is pushed to Outlook on the next odoo2microsoft sync - Spurious "join the meeting now" notifications are sent to attendees Add a `follow_recurrence` guard so that when the base event is an exception (follow_recurrence=False), the non-destructive else branch is taken instead, preserving all Microsoft IDs. Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#256263 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#254414
This update fixes a problem where PoS orders with additional products prevented successful settlement from the Point of Sale. The system now correctly calculates the total amount based on the PoS order, ensuring sales can be settled properly after down payments and extra items are added. This resolves a scenario where the sale order total was incorrectly calculated.
Original PR description
The following commit introduced a change in compute_unpaid_amount. https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/b8b50a797cdc0053643f959eb2d04800163fe005 The unpaid_amount is now computed from the PoS order total instead of the settle payment order line. This causes an issue when the PoS order contains additional product lines besides the settle payment line. In such cases, the total amount may exceed the sale order amount, preventing the sale order from being settled again from the PoS. How to reproduce: - Create a sale order. - Apply a down payment in the PoS. - Add other products before validating the payment. - Ensure the total exceeds the sale order amount. - Pay the order. - Try to settle the same sale order from PoS, cannot find it. opw-5821232
This update fixes an issue where users were incorrectly grouping POS orders in the l10n_pe_edi_pos module. The system now validates order groupings, preventing errors and providing clear messages to users attempting to combine invoices without the necessary shared identifiers. This ensures accurate reporting and compliance for Peruvian businesses.
Original PR description
Joining the values in the selection field with a coma, and then putting everything in another selection field was plain wrong. We now check a bit better what we're generating, and refrain the user with error messages when they try grouping on the same invoices orders that do not share the necessary key values.
This update resolves an issue where credit notes created via 'Reverse and create invoice' didn't correctly show the original invoice's source information. The fix ensures that the source document is accurately reflected in the generated invoice PDF, improving reporting and traceability. This maintains consistent data across invoices and sales orders.
Original PR description
### Issue before this commit: When creating a credit note using “Reverse and create invoice”, the generated invoice loses the Source field. While the original invoice correctly displays the source,…
### Issue before this commit: When creating a credit note using “Reverse and create invoice”, the generated invoice loses the Source field. While the original invoice correctly displays the source, the new invoice created after reversal does not, leading to missing information in the report. ### Steps to reproduce the issue: 1. Create a sales order for product A 2. Deliver product A 3. Create invoice 4. Create credit note by clicking on "Reverse and create invoice" 5. The new invoice correctly remains linked to the Sales order 6. However, the source document disapear on the PDF ### Cause of the issue: In the reversal flow, the new invoice is created using copy_data() without explicitly preserving the invoice_origin field. As a result, the newly created invoice does not inherit the source information from the original invoice, even though it is still logically linked. ### Reason to introduce the fix: To ensure consistency between invoices and preserve important traceability information, the invoice_origin field must be propagated to the new invoice created during the reversal process. This guarantees that the Source is correctly displayed in the PDF. opw-6034574 --- I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#254290
We've been experiencing an increase in failed payments due to an issue with the Flutterwave payment processor. This change updates how the phone number is sent to Flutterwave, aligning with a recent API update that requires an unformatted phone number. This resolves the 'invalid billToPhone' error and ensures smoother payment processing.
Original PR description
With are recently seeing an increasing number of payments that fail with an `invalid billToPhone` error. It's unclear if it's a recent change of flutterwave API or of any intermediary payment processor, but the flutterwave v4.0.0-beta API now state to send the phone number "unformatted" - even if there is no such statement for the v3.0.0 API (that we are using), based on testing, sending the phone number "unformatted" do so seems do solve the issue. So this commit, sanitize the phone number to send it unformatted. opw-6074825 --- I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#256315
This update fixes an issue where the barcode scanner was incorrectly using the user's company instead of the current business context. This resulted in incorrect barcode lookups. The fix ensures the scanner uses the correct company information, resolving the problem of incorrect product identification.
Original PR description
### Issue: The company used in the main barcode menu is the `company_id` of the user rather than the current contextual company of the session. This is problematic as we might endup using the wrong…
### Issue: The company used in the main barcode menu is the `company_id` of the user rather than the current contextual company of the session. This is problematic as we might endup using the wrong barcode nomenclature. ### Steps to reproduce: - Have 2 companies: company 1 and company 2 - Set the barcode nomenclature of company 1: default, company 2: GS1 - Incarnate a user allowed in both companies but with default company 1 - With company 2, create a product and set its barcode to 36939282410106 - From the main menu open the barcode app and scan 0136939282410106 #### > No product was found (even thought it is correct in GS1) ### Cause of the issue: Scanning from the main barcode menu will trigger a call of the `main_menu` method relying on the nomenclature of the contextual company of the request: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/804ea21c225a7a1e0763bac188f027adeb3ab78f/stock_barcode/static/src/main_menu/main_menu.js#L98-L99 https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/804ea21c225a7a1e0763bac188f027adeb3ab78f/stock_barcode/controllers/stock_barcode.py#L15-L21 However, when opening the main barcode menu from the app menu, no contextual warehouse was set to the view: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/804ea21c225a7a1e0763bac188f027adeb3ab78f/stock_barcode/views/stock_barcode_views.xml#L6-L11 As such, the environment of the request will be set here: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/9393b0db6791fe5a7f576cff55705e315fb3dd11/odoo/http.py#L2083 based on the company of the user rather than the one of the context: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/9393b0db6791fe5a7f576cff55705e315fb3dd11/odoo/api.py#L694-L722 ### Fix: Setting the company slices the `current_company` in first position of the `allowed_company_ids`: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/260c69ed64f8663b6935b9863c86aac6dbecd961/addons/web/static/src/webclient/switch_company_menu/switch_company_menu.js#L33-L39 https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/260c69ed64f8663b6935b9863c86aac6dbecd961/addons/web/static/src/webclient/switch_company_menu/switch_company_menu.js#L68-L81 which can be recovered from the cookies via the `_get_allowed_company_ids`: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/43f65ff2f3c6177cc69647bbb85bb40a84409457/stock_barcode/controllers/stock_barcode.py#L432-L442 precisely used by the `_get_barcode_nomenclature`: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/43f65ff2f3c6177cc69647bbb85bb40a84409457/stock_barcode/controllers/stock_barcode.py#L485-L491 Note that passing the context in the arguments of the `main_menu` JSON route will not really solve the issue by it self since the context is no longer shared with the request: c8cd1d4a83de7a5798cbb910a788fbb6fe208d2f ### Additional Issue: The type `dest_location` does not exist on barcode types: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/485a64b6a1e91feb4310f282c6dd1cd021f1780b/addons/barcodes_gs1_nomenclature/models/barcode_rule.py#L16-L20 so that the type used by these lines can not work: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/1dedc5bbcee43bfd13e55206e3d7364f715ca9be/stock_barcode/controllers/stock_barcode.py#L29-L30 https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/1dedc5bbcee43bfd13e55206e3d7364f715ca9be/stock_barcode/controllers/stock_barcode.py#L52-L56 ### Steps to reproduce: - In the settings enable: Multi-Steps Routes - Set the barcode nomenclature to GS1 - Set your warehouse in receipt in two steps and add a barcode to the WH/Input: 3033710074365 - From the main menu open the barcode app and scan 4133033710074365 #### > No product or picking was found (even thought it is correct in GS1 that should create an internal transfer with WH/INPUT as destination) opw-5847529 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#112006 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#111662
This update fixes an error in the Point of Sale session reports where discount amounts were calculated incorrectly. The fix ensures that discounts are applied accurately after the fiscal position is applied, leading to more reliable financial reporting. This improves the accuracy of sales data and reduces potential discrepancies.
Original PR description
Steps: ---- - Create a fiscal position with 2 different taxes - Add a line in POS - Apply fiscal position and add line discount - Finish the order cycle - Download the session report Issue: ---- - The discount amount was calculated incorrectly in the session report Cause: ---- - The discount amount calculation used taxes before applying the fiscal position Fix: ---- - Used `tax_ids_after_fiscal_position` for tax calculation while computing the discount amount task-5421215 --- I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#247072 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#244650
This update resolves an issue where confirming quantities of archived products through the barcode app would trigger an error. The fix ensures that archived products are included in product searches, allowing users to accurately manage and confirm quantities, maintaining consistent functionality.
Original PR description
Currently, when a user confirms the quantity of an archived product using the product selector in the barcode app, a traceback error occurs. ## Steps to replicate: - Install Inventory - Go to…
Currently, when a user confirms the quantity of an archived product using the product selector in the barcode app, a traceback error occurs. ## Steps to replicate: - Install Inventory - Go to Settings and enable Multi-Step Routes > Set Warehouse Routes. - Configure 2 steps for outgoing shipments. - Go to Inventory and create a new delivery with - **Source Location:** WH/Stock - **Product:** [E-COM10] Pedal Bin with demand 1 - Mark as Todo then Archive the Pedal Bin product. - Open that delivery in barcode app - Pencil icon > +1 > Confirm ## Observed behavior: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'qty_available') ## Root cause: After this [commit], an override was added to the product selector. As a result, when [2] calls the `search_read` method, it only retrieves non-archived products Consequently, if the result is an empty array, attempting to access `qty_available` causes the type error mentioned above. ## Solution: Adding` active_test = false `to the context ensures that archived products are included in search results. This prevents empty results and avoids the error. It also allows quantities to be added and confirmed,maintaining the same behavior as when using the increment button followed by validation, ensuring consistency. [commit]: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/commit/6aa814f59f8641d7b57af160e38b50d5bdfc8a97 [2]- https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/e13b44b353e734a6533f7d627ed69b6e7b033ee2/stock_barcode/static/src/js/stock_barcode_sml_form.js#L40-L45 opw-5980428 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#109204
This update fixes an issue where the Field Service onboarding tour would stop after redirects to the portal. The change ensures the tour state is preserved in the user's session, allowing the tour to resume seamlessly when returning to the Field Service app. This enhances the user experience for new Field Service users.
Original PR description
**Steps to reproduce:**
1. Go to Field Service app.
2. Check the worksheet template in settings and start the onboarding tour
of Field Service.
**Issue:**
The backend tour is not resuming on the frontend side.
**Fix:**
This commit ensures the tour is enabled and the current tour is added to the frontend session. When the tour resumes, it will fetch the tour enabled and current tour details from the session.
**Technical:**
In the tour service, the tour resumes only if the mode is set to "auto" or toursEnabled is present in the session. To handle this, we added the tour details to the session.
tour_service.js
``` js
if (tourState.getCurrentConfig().mode === "auto" || toursEnabled) {
resumeTour();
}
````
task-4489657
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#202484This update resolves a problem preventing invoices from being correctly linked to purchase orders. The fix ensures that price comparisons account for the 'Product Price' precision, which was previously causing mismatches. This resolves a critical issue impacting invoice processing for a major customer.
Original PR description
Fixes Task 5213234 Issue: In AccountMove method _find_matching_po_and_inv_lines (called when looking for a subset match of EDI invoice lines with PO lines), the price_unit of a purchase.order.line is…
Fixes Task 5213234 Issue: In AccountMove method _find_matching_po_and_inv_lines (called when looking for a subset match of EDI invoice lines with PO lines), the price_unit of a purchase.order.line is compared to the price_unit of an invoice line. However, currently the comparisons do not take into account the precision to be applied to product prices. In some cases, the invoice line price_unit differs from the price_unit in a PO line, but by less than the "Product Price" precision. With the current comparisons this leads to not matching the lines. This has prevented matching some invoices received via Peppol for at least one big customer (see Task-5213234) Steps to reproduce: - Create an XML document for an EDI UBL invoice with 2 lines; the first line has a price_unit 113.57 euros (for example) - Create a PO with a reference matching the invoice, and one PO line with a price_unit matching the price_unit of the first invoice line (113.57 euros) - Upload the XML invoice and create a bill from it; during the creation of the account.move.line, the price_unit gets a value which is slightly different from 113.57 (113.57000000000001) (due to python rounding ?) - Result: no link is established between the PO and the invoice. This fix makes sure that the "Product Price" precision is used when comparing the invoice line price_unit with a PO line price_unit. opw-5213234 --- I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#235477 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#232527