Daily updates from Odoo
Monday, March 30, 2026
11 changes · saas-18.4
Resolved issues and error corrections
This update corrects an issue preventing the export of Profit & Loss reports with footnotes enabled in the l10n_lu_reports module. The fix addresses a dependency on an outdated model, ensuring proper XML generation and report functionality. This resolves a technical problem impacting report generation for Luxembourg accounting.
Original PR description
**Steps to reproduce:** * Install the **l10n_lu_reports** module. * Go to **Accounting → Reporting → Profit & Loss**. * Add a footnote on a report line (**⋮ → Annotate**). * Click **Export (XML)** to open the export wizard. * Enable **Import notes as references** and export. **Observed behavior:** * Export fails with `KeyError: 'account.report.manager'`. * XML file cannot be generated when references are enabled. **Cause:** * The export logic relied on the deprecated `account.report.manager` model. * This model was removed in v17([commit](https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/pull/33604/changes#diff-5fc5051f5c0211c0eec96b892e7d29e01b68d804417443502d17bccd8333d7ecL41)) and replaced by `account.report.footnote`. * The footnote retrieval code was not migrated accordingly. **Fix:** * Migrate reference retrieval to use `account.report.footnote`. opw-5890630 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#111845 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#107765
A recent update caused partner names in the approval request report to be cut off when exceeding a certain length. This fix adds a column limit to the partner field, ensuring all data is displayed correctly and preventing data truncation. This improves the report's accuracy and readability.
Original PR description
step to reproduce: - install "approval" with demo data - have a partner with name length > 63 - open one of the approvals and change its type to "general approval" - add this partner in contact field - print approval request report Observation: - the partner overflows out of report Fix: - we limit the partner field with `col-9`. For a safe measure i have added `col-9` for `request_owner_id` and `approver_ids` **Before** <img width="1057" height="326" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a8eea789-5cc7-4658-88b5-78751759d043" /> **After** <img width="994" height="330" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/bfbc061b-a6e0-4593-a3cc-c85cb81db6e2" /> opw-6005752 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#111130
This update resolves an inconsistency in the tax report when vendor bills include expense lines with different vehicle assignments. The fix allows for accurate reporting by relaxing a strict matching rule that previously flagged mixed vehicle lines. This ensures all tax calculations are correct, regardless of whether a vehicle is associated with an expense line.
Original PR description
**Steps to reproduce:** * Install the **account** and **fleet** modules. * Create a vendor bill with two expense lines using the same tax. * Assign a vehicle_id to one line but leave the other…
**Steps to reproduce:** * Install the **account** and **fleet** modules. * Create a vendor bill with two expense lines using the same tax. * Assign a vehicle_id to one line but leave the other without a vehicle. * Confirm the vendor bill. * Go to **Accounting > Reporting > Tax Report** and Go to `Account > Tax` report. **Observed behavior:** * The tax report shows: 'This report contains inconsistencies. The affected lines are marked with a warning.' **Cause:** * The `_get_extra_query_base_tax_line_mapping()` override forced vehicle_id matching using `COALESCE(base_line.vehicle_id, 0) = COALESCE(account_move_line.vehicle_id, 0)`. * When lines share a tax but have different vehicle_id values (one set, one NULL), Odoo creates a single tax line with `vehicle_id = NULL`. * The strict COALESCE constraint prevented this tax line from matching either base line (NULL ≠ vehicle_id and NULL ≠ NULL when coalesced to 0), causing the inconsistency. **Fix:** * Changed the constraint to only enforce vehicle_id matching when both the base line and tax line have a vehicle_id set. * If either side is NULL, the match is allowed, letting shared tax lines work correctly across mixed vehicle/non-vehicle expense lines. opw-5956645 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#112313 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#110616
This update fixes an issue where tax returns for Italian companies incorrectly included pension fund taxes, leading to discrepancies between reports and the backend view. The change excludes these taxes from the tax return calculation, ensuring accurate reporting and alignment with customer data. This resolves a prior inconsistency.
Original PR description
The "amount to pay" incorrectly included the Pension Fund taxes, causing inconsistencies between the report and what the customer was able to see in the backend. Now we exclude them from the tax return domain. Steps to reproduce: - Create an Italian company with the Italian CoA - Install `l10n_it_edi_withholding` (not necessary in v19) - Create an invoice - Set the 4% INPS or 4% F.Pens taxes on a line, along with with a normal 22% VAT - Create a tax return Ticket [link](https://www.odoo.com/odoo/project.task/5909407) opw-5909407 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#111311
A test used an incorrect date reference (2027) which caused it to fail. This fix adjusted the test's date to 2026-02-28 to accurately reflect the payroll calculations, ensuring the test now passes. This resolves a potential issue with reporting accuracy.
Original PR description
[FIX] l10n_ch_hr_payroll_elm_transmission: fix avs test for faketime build
Bug reproduction:
1 - v.17->run test_generic_avs_deductions test with faketime 2027-01-01 12:00 UTC->test fails
Bug cause:
1 - In the test, compute_sheet()->_get_payslip_lines->_compute_rule->_get_avs_rates is called
2 - There is a line like that if line.date_from <= target and (not line.date_to or target <= line.date_to)
3 - I looked to avs_line_ids = fields.One2many(default=_get_default_avs_line_ids)
4 - In _get_default_avs_line_ids -> 'date_from': fields.Date.today().replace(month=1, day=1) date_from is calculated like that -> when the year is 2027, the date_from is 2027-01-01 and it is bigger than the target in the test.
Bug solution:
1 - I used @freeze_time("2026-02-28") in my test to prevent this behavior.
Runbot Error Link: https://runbot.odoo.com/odoo/runbot.build.error/240992
task - 6018940
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#109975This update fixes an issue where scanning a different serial number than the reserved one during batch processing didn't create a new lot. The fix ensures that the correct lot is always used when scanning a batch, preventing incorrect inventory tracking. This improves data accuracy and reliability.
Original PR description
Issue ----- When processing batches in barcode, scanning a BC with a different SN than the reserved one does not lead to creating a new lot in stock. The reserved one is still the one getting taken…
Issue
-----
When processing batches in barcode, scanning a BC with a different SN than the reserved one does not lead to creating a new lot in stock. The reserved one is still the one getting taken regardless of setting.
Steps to reproduce
-----
- Enable GS1 nomenclature, lots & batches
- Go to Inventory > Configuration > Operation Types > Delivery Orders
- Enable Lots/Serial Numbers > Create New
- Create a product
- Barcode 23456789012344
- Tracked by SN
- 1 in stock (SN 1234)
- Create a delivery for the product and add it to a batch
- Open the batch in barcode
- Scan 012345678901234410BATCHSN1
- Confirm the delviery
- Go back to the picking and see the lines' details
> The line used the reserved SN
Cause
-----
The existing line gets matched in `_findLine`
https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/45d3a537c3b2eaccee425d959e89d26229e376cd/stock_barcode/static/src/models/barcode_model.js#L1085
because none of the conditions before
https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/45d3a537c3b2eaccee425d959e89d26229e376cd/stock_barcode/static/src/models/barcode_model.js#L1402
get matched. This is unexpected but necessary for batches, as it ensures barcode correctly swaps to the correct picking in the batch. If the line was not matched we would be creating a new line in the same picking than the last scanned line, regardless of which picking the reservation is made in.
Because a line is matched, we have to force its' `lot_id` to `false` so that the new one gets created (`lot_name` is used for display but `lot_id` takes precedence).
-----
Ticket:
opw-5216921
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#111956
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#109671This update fixes an issue where users were incorrectly grouping POS orders in the l10n_pe_edi_pos module. The system now validates order groupings, preventing errors and providing clear messages to users attempting to combine invoices without the necessary shared identifiers. This ensures accurate reporting and compliance for Peruvian businesses.
Original PR description
Joining the values in the selection field with a coma, and then putting everything in another selection field was plain wrong. We now check a bit better what we're generating, and refrain the user with error messages when they try grouping on the same invoices orders that do not share the necessary key values. Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#111616
This update clarifies the error message displayed when an upsell's start date is set after the next invoice date. This change ensures users receive clearer guidance, preventing confusion and potential issues with subscription billing. It's a simple fix to improve the user experience.
Original PR description
Update the error message when an upsell start date is on or after the next invoice date, so it be more clear for the users. task-5893032 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#106757
This update resolves an issue where the VAT partner listing report was not displaying all customers. The fix involves adjusting a setting to load all partners, ensuring accurate reporting for VAT compliance in Belgium. This ensures all relevant financial data is available for analysis.
Original PR description
With l10n_be company: - Create at least two invoices for two different customers (companies) for whom you will add a fake VAT number. Make sure the total on both your invoices is more than 250€ and…
With l10n_be company: - Create at least two invoices for two different customers (companies) for whom you will add a fake VAT number. Make sure the total on both your invoices is more than 250€ and set their Accounting date to last year. - Go check the VAT partner Listing report (Accounting > Reporting); make sure you see both partners in the listing. - Click on returns > Check that report return then Submit and download the XML file: both partners & amounts will appear. - Now with dev mode, go to Accounting reports, open the Partner VAT listing form > Options > set the "load more limit" to 1. Download the XML again: only the first partner appears (the only that was loaded with the load more limit. This commit is a backport of bugfix: PR odoo/enterprise#106134 commit e532750fe3dc1f2d10d995d01446b04a3a227a72 Original problem introduced in `saas-18.3`: PR odoo/enterprise#111783 commit 4c927b389252b595bcbb44d020899ae5abf0aa89 Ticket [link](https://www.odoo.com/odoo/project.task/6051120) opw-6051120 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#111783
This update resolves a test failure within the industry_fsm_report module. The issue stemmed from a wizard opening unexpectedly when there was only one worksheet, causing test failures. A workaround was implemented by adding a worksheet before running the tour to prevent the wizard from opening.
Original PR description
When there is only one worksheet, the ‘**Explore Worksheets Using an Example Template**’ wizard opens. Because of this, the test fails without demo data. If we add steps for this wizard, it won’t open when there is more than one worksheet, which will again cause the test to fail. Also, we cannot add this conditon on step. Therefore, to ignore this wizard, i created a worksheet before running the tour so that the wizard does not open. https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/85bd9d80a1a784f1baff1493b2eaec4a17ea9c9b/industry_fsm_report/models/project_task.py#L122-L135 task-4489657 runbot issue-240933
This update resolves a bug that occurred when creating contracts with a working schedule having zero hours. The issue caused a calculation error (division by zero) during wage computation. This fix ensures accurate wage calculations for all contract types, regardless of working hour values.
Original PR description
When a working schedule has 0 working hours, creating a contract raises a traceback during hourly wage computation. Steps to reproduce the error: - Install ``l10n_au_hr_payroll`` module - Switch to ``My Australian Company`` - Create a working schedule without any working hours - Create an employee and assign this working schedule > Save - Click on Contracts smart button Traceback: ```py ZeroDivisionError: float division by zero ``` https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/bd746aa43f549c4f7813a849e00447b55e084f21/l10n_au_hr_payroll/models/hr_contract.py#L113-L115 The hourly wage is computed using the working schedule’s hours per day. When this value is 0, it results in the above traceback. sentry-7355577930 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#111629