Thursday, April 9, 2026
7 changes · saas-18.2
Resolved issues and error corrections
This update fixes a reporting issue where negative values in the Mod 390 tax report for Spain were not correctly marked with the 'N' indicator, as required by Spanish tax regulations. Adding the necessary parameter ensures accurate BOE file exports, aligning with official documentation and improving compliance.
Original PR description
### Issue: Negative values in the Mod 390 report were not properly marked with the N indicator for several fields ### Cause: The parameter `signed=True` was missing on some fields where negative…
### Issue: Negative values in the Mod 390 report were not properly marked with the N indicator for several fields ### Cause: The parameter `signed=True` was missing on some fields where negative values should include the N indicator in the BOE export ### Note: According to the official specification, negative amounts must be explicitly marked with N Latest documentation: https://sede.agenciatributaria.gob.es/static_files/Sede/Disenyo_registro/DR_300_399/archivos_25/dr390e2025.xlsx ### Steps to reproduce: - Install `l10n_es_reports` with demo data and switch to the ES company - Create a Bill (Price: 100, Taxes: 21% G) - Go to Tax Report and select Tax Report (Mod 390) (ES) for the full year - Open the VAT Deductible tab - The last line (65) should be negative - Export the BOE file using the gear menu - Check the last value of section 4 in the file ### Before the fix: Negative values were not marked with N opw-5482706 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#113200 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#111262
This update fixes a problem where users weren't receiving clear error messages when the SendCloud delivery service failed. A helpful hint has been added to the system, guiding users to resolve delivery issues more effectively. This improves the overall user experience and reduces potential delays.
Original PR description
Add hint with error message. ----- Ticket: opw-6072855 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#112463
This update fixes an issue where credit notes were incorrectly showing positive amounts in tax reports. The fix now accurately reflects credit notes by reversing the sign based on whether the move is a refund. This ensures accurate tax reporting for Thai businesses using the l10n_th module.
Original PR description
# How to reproduce - Install the l10n_th module - Use the demo TH company - Ensure you have the demo invoices and credit notes associated to that company - Go to the Tax Report - Select Tax Report…
# How to reproduce - Install the l10n_th module - Use the demo TH company - Ensure you have the demo invoices and credit notes associated to that company - Go to the Tax Report - Select Tax Report (TH) - Click on "Sales Tax Report (xlsx)" # The problem The Credit Notes' Total Amount, Total Excl and Vat Amount are positives. They should be negative instead. The same issue appear for "Purchase Tax Report (xlsx)". This issue also concerns Credit Notes created manually in the Journal Entries # Why The logic for the sign of the value fields in the reports is the following : ```py sign = move.reversed_entry_id.payment_state == 'partial' and -1 or 1 ``` This is unreliable because a Credit Note will not always have a reversed_entry_id associated or if it has one, it's payment_state may change A refactor of theses reports has been made for versions 19.0+ but it seems too big to backport (https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/pull/75645/changes) Instead, we just check if the current move's type is a refund. If yes, we reverse the sign. opw-6006720 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#113372 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#110816
This update addresses a problem where delivery confirmations weren't being sent correctly due to missing tracking data. The fix prevents errors when tracking information is unavailable, ensuring accurate picking validation and preventing unintended shipping creation in Easypost. Easypost support suggested a slight delay between order placement and tracking retrieval as a potential workaround.
Original PR description
Problem: 'tracker' object in response from GET /orders/:id request can sometimes be null. This means that when the mail template 'mail_template_data_delivery_confirmation' is sent, a traceback occurs…
Problem: 'tracker' object in response from GET /orders/:id request can sometimes be null. This means that when the mail template 'mail_template_data_delivery_confirmation' is sent, a traceback occurs with error: TypeError: 'NoneType' object is not subscriptable. As a result the picking is not validated in odoo but a shipping has succesfully been created in the easypost backend. Solution: Prevent traceback form happening, picking gets correctly validated and carrier_tracking_url field is empty. Transcript from Easypost support: << I'm also seeing the tracker showing as null when reviewing the response. I'll go ahead and create a ticket for the engineering team to investigate. I can see that the tracking code is being returned in the request, but the full tracking object is not. Since this appears to be happening on a case-by-case basis, you may want to allow more time between the BUY and the GET requests, as I noticed they are being triggered very close together. I'm not certain if that's related, but it may be worth trying as a troubleshooting step while we have this under review. >> opw-5402415 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#111833
This update resolves a technical issue preventing the correct return of invoice data during import through the Peppol system. The change ensures that the system now properly identifies and returns the newly created invoice record, improving the reliability of the Peppol integration. This fix addresses a previous development that was not fully implemented.
Original PR description
Due to 271d6f2af4eea1ac2a79850069118c00dd97db97, the import invoice method in Peppol should return the created move and not just True. With the documents_account_peppol module, that change was not fully merged. opw-6102218 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#113291
This update resolves an issue where closing a session was prevented if an order lacked a user ID during export generation. The change ensures a fallback user ID is used, allowing sessions to close reliably. This enhances the stability and functionality of the POS certification process.
Original PR description
Before this commit, closing a session was blocked if an order was missing the user_id field during DSFinV-K export generation. opw-6067382 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#112119
This update corrects an issue where special characters (&) in vendor bill references were causing errors during SEPA payment file generation. The fix replaces '&' with '+' to ensure compliance with SEPA/SIX standards, preventing payment rejection by banks. This ensures accurate and compliant SEPA payment processing.
Original PR description
Steps to reproduce: 1. Install modules `account_batch_payment` and `l10n_ch`. 2. Configure SEPA Credit Transfer for a CH company. 3. Create a vendor bill with a reference containing `&` (e.g. "Net &…
Steps to reproduce: 1. Install modules `account_batch_payment` and `l10n_ch`. 2. Configure SEPA Credit Transfer for a CH company. 3. Create a vendor bill with a reference containing `&` (e.g. "Net & Cost"), confirm it and register a payment using SEPA Credit Transfer. 4. Create a batch payment with the SEPA payment and validate it. Issue: The `&` character is exported as `&` in the generated PAIN XML, while according to the SIX specification it should be replaced with `+` Cause: The payment reference is inserted into the PAIN XML file without replacing the '&' character. During XML generation this produces an invalid entity (`&`) which results in an `XMLSyntaxError` and prevents the payment file from being processed. Solution: Replace the `&` character with `+` when sanitizing the payment communication so that the generated value complies with the SEPA/SIX character set and produces valid XML. Reference[Pg: 9]: https://www.europeanpaymentscouncil.eu/sites/default/files/KB/files/EPC217-08%20Draft%20Best%20Practices%20SEPA%20Requirements%20for%20Character%20Set%20v1.1.pdf opw-5941724 Co-authored by @bhra-odoo Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#110809