Thursday, April 23, 2026
7 changes · saas-18.3
Resolved issues and error corrections
This update fixes a Calendar reminder issue where the meeting organizer could miss in-app notifications. Internal users, including administrators, now reliably receive alarm alerts while portal and public users remain excluded.
Original PR description
Steps to reproduce: --------------------------------- 1. Install Calendar module with demo 2. For both Users: User > Preferences > Notifications > In Odoo 3. Log in through Admin > Calendar > New…
Steps to reproduce:
---------------------------------
1. Install Calendar module with demo
2. For both Users: User > Preferences > Notifications > In Odoo
3. Log in through Admin > Calendar > New meeting
4. Set a start time in the near future
5. Add Marc Demo as an attendee
6. Under Options > Reminders, add a reminder that triggers shortly before the meeting (e.g., 15 minutes)
7. Save the meeting
8. Log in as Marc Demo in another browser window
9. Wait until the reminder time is reached
Observation:
---------------------------------
The reminder notification is displayed for Marc Demo. The Administrator (Mitchell Admin) does not receive any notification.
Issue:
---------------------------------
In `_notify_next_alarm`, the domain
`('group_ids', 'in', self.env.ref('base.group_user').ids)`
was used to filter internal users. However, the admin user does not have
`base.group_user` directly in their `group_ids`, it is only present in `group_ids.all_implied_ids` (inherited through group hierarchy). This caused the admin user to be excluded from the user search, so no bus alarm notification was sent to them.
Solution:
---------------------------------
The `share` field on `res.users` correctly identifies internal users (`share=False`) vs portal/public users (`share=True`) by checking the full group hierarchy, including implied groups. This ensures the admin (and all internal users) receive alarm notifications while still excluding portal and public users.
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/b261223c8e15c412a06a0d938d217bdf0ab9f9ff/odoo/addons/base/models/res_users.py#L459-L464
opw-6010337
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#255263This update corrects a reporting error that incorrectly displayed planned hours on public holiday days. The fix ensures the system accurately excludes public holidays, regardless of whether they're linked to a specific calendar, and accounts for timezone differences to prevent date inconsistencies.
Original PR description
### Steps to reproduce: - Install project_timesheet_forecast module - Configure your database to have a far timezone (Montevideo/Uruguay in my case) - Create a public holiday starts from 12AM to…
### Steps to reproduce: - Install project_timesheet_forecast module - Configure your database to have a far timezone (Montevideo/Uruguay in my case) - Create a public holiday starts from 12AM to 11:59PM with a calendar - Create a planning slot for a resource that overlap with the public holiday - Check the Timesheets / Planning analysis report - Group by employees > day **- Check the date of the public holiday and notice there are still planned hours shown** - Remove the calendar from the public holidays that we created previously - Check the report once again **- Notice the day of the public holiday and the day after has no planned hours** ### Cause: In the query we are using to exclude the leave days from the report we only exclude the ones that has calendar_id assigned, not taking into consideration that some of the public holiday are general and is not applied to just one working schedule. Also if we have a leave starting midnight to 11:59PM since we store dates in database as UTC for timezone like Uruguay's one it will shift the end with one day which will introduce inconsistencies ### Fix: We check if the calendar_id is null on the resource_calendar_leaves and make sure we take timezone of the resource into account when checking the dates of the leaves. opw-5027070 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#111846
This update fixes an issue where the quantity of scanned packages was incorrectly displayed after re-entering a delivery order. When 'Move Entire Packages' is enabled, the system now accurately reflects the quantity of picked packages, ensuring accurate inventory tracking. This improves the reliability of barcode scanning for package deliveries.
Original PR description
Issue ----- When using full packaging in barcode, leaving the operation and opening it again shows incorrect quantity for already scanned packages. Steps to reproduce ----- - Enable packages - Create…
Issue ----- When using full packaging in barcode, leaving the operation and opening it again shows incorrect quantity for already scanned packages. Steps to reproduce ----- - Enable packages - Create a product with one package in stock - Operation Types > Delivery Orders, set Move Entire Packages to true - Create a delivery for a package - Scan the package barcode - Exit the delivery - Re-enter the delivery > Quantity for the line is 1/false Cause ----- The line is picked, so it is considered as not reserved https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/02f957b600bac3d86411091fd762d88e372db7c5/stock_barcode/static/src/models/barcode_picking_model.js#L288-L289 when doing https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/02f957b600bac3d86411091fd762d88e372db7c5/stock_barcode/static/src/models/barcode_picking_model.js#L812-L813 This leads to `qtyDemand` returning false instead of 1 https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/02f957b600bac3d86411091fd762d88e372db7c5/stock_barcode/static/src/components/package_line.js#L17-L18 ----- Ticket: opw-5960629 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#114451 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#113816
This update fixes an issue where invoices generated from KSeF bills weren't correctly processing gross unit prices. The system now handles both net and gross unit price options provided by vendors, ensuring accurate invoice generation and compliance with Polish tax regulations. This prevents incorrect invoices and potential financial discrepancies.
Original PR description
**PROBLEM** When receiving bills from KSeF, we don't handle gross unit price and default to a price_unit of 0.0. Leading to an incorrect invoice. When generating the bill, the vendor can choose to report the net unit price (P_9A) or gross unit price (P_9B). We need to handle both cases. opw-6066027 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#260314
This fix ensures that tax reports for international customers using foreign VAT IDs correctly utilize the customer's VAT number instead of the company's. Previously, the system incorrectly used the company's VAT, leading to inaccurate tax reporting. This update resolves a critical issue for businesses operating across borders.
Original PR description
### Issue: When a fiscal position defines a `foreign_vat`, tax reports generated for that country still use the company's VAT number instead For example, with a Belgian fiscal position using…
### Issue: When a fiscal position defines a `foreign_vat`, tax reports generated for that country still use the company's VAT number instead For example, with a Belgian fiscal position using `BE010203040`, the generated BE VAT report uses the company VAT instead of `010203040` ### Cause: The report generation did not check whether there is a fiscal position with a `foreign_vat` matching the country of the report ### Note: The example above uses a Belgian fiscal position to reproduce the issue Starting from 19.0, this specific flow is blocked because Intervat is enabled in production mode by default A related fix makes the Intervat settings available in that case Until then, the issue can be reproduced by temporarily commenting out: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/5fb58a9b7b3ae89f87e84d4ba1fa3a16237d80ac/l10n_be_intervat/models/account_return.py#L15 ### Steps to reproduce: - Disable demo data and install `accountant` - Create a Fiscal Position "Belgium" (Country: Belgium, Foreign Tax ID: BE010203040) - Click the alert to install the Belgian taxes - Create and confirm an invoice for a Belgian customer: - Fiscal Position: Belgium - Any product with a Belgian tax - Invoice Date: 01/01/2026 - Open the Tax Report and select `VAT Return (BE)` for January - Click `Returns` and select the full year - Mark the December return as Completed from the three-dot menu - Review January and fill the missing company data (TIN: 1111111, phone and email) - Click `Validate -> Lock -> Submit` ### Before the fix: The generated XML uses the company VAT number (`1111111`) instead of the fiscal position foreign VAT (`010203040`). opw-6076540
This update fixes an error in how tax returns are calculated for companies with multiple branches. Previously, rounding adjustments were incorrectly applied, leading to inaccurate closing entries. The change ensures accurate tax return calculations by using company-specific data during the closing process.
Original PR description
Some countries lile Estonia, Nederlands or France apply a rounding from the tax report by adding a line to the end of the query results representing the sum of the roundings on each line of the tax…
Some countries lile Estonia, Nederlands or France apply a rounding from the tax report by adding a line to the end of the query results representing the sum of the roundings on each line of the tax report. When having a company with branches, the rounding is applying in each closing move (one per company/branch) but the value is coming from the aggregated report lines, this leads to wrong computation of the closing entries. Cause: In `_generate_tax_closing_entries` we loop over each company, therefore `_compute_tax_closing_entry` is called one time for each company, but it uses the report options containing all companies Fix: Use options with only the current company in `_compute_tax_closing_entry` Steps: - Install FR localisation - Select FR company and create two branches - Create, for last month: - 1 bill for parent company (100 with tax 20% G) - 1 invoice per branch (200 and 300 with tax 20% G) - Create a tax return with opining date at the beginning of the current month - Submit the last return and go to the created closing entries -> See that closing entries are wrong opw-5976359
This update resolves an issue where non-admin users accessing the Accounting Dashboard from a child company with a currency-set journal would encounter an access error. The fix bypasses specific record rules when a currency ID is present, allowing the dashboard to function correctly for all users and company setups. This ensures consistent access to financial data.
Original PR description
Backport of https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/e371eb4a1717bfeb65ad756287249a2fb3b13e4f Issue before this commit: Opening the Accounting Dashboard from a child company as a non-admin user raises an Access Error when the journal has a currency_id set. The error occurs with journal which currency id is set Steps to Reproduce: - Install the account module. - Create a child company - Create a journal with a currency set - Log in as a non-admin user. - Select only the child company - Open Accounting (Dashboard) Cause of the Issue: When the journal does not have a currency_id, the system reads company data using sudo(), so no access issue occurs. When the journal has a currency_id, sudo() is not used, and reading the company name triggers an Access Error. With This Commit: Bypass record rules when reading the company name if the journal has a currency_id. opw-6048025 --- I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr