Thursday, April 30, 2026
3 changes · saas-18.4
Resolved issues and error corrections
This update ensures that barcode validations in the stock picking app correctly check if a destination has been scanned before processing. Previously, the system didn't verify destination scanning, even when enabled. This change ensures accurate validation and prevents issues with incomplete picking processes.
Original PR description
### Steps to reproduce: - In the settings: Enable "Storage Locations" - Inventory > Configuration > Warehouse Management > Operation Types - On receipts, in the Barcode App tab enable: "Force a…
### Steps to reproduce: - In the settings: Enable "Storage Locations" - Inventory > Configuration > Warehouse Management > Operation Types - On receipts, in the Barcode App tab enable: "Force a destination on all products" - Open the barcode app, create a new receipt - Scan a product > Validate #### > You are not blocked by the fact that you did not scan any destination even just to validate the default one ### Cause of the issue: The `barcode_validation_after_dest_location` operation type setting is not used at any point in the barcode app. ### Note: Line in the barcode app are always created a with a `location_dest_id`: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/a220fc61d9076decdb987421df9330a1c2c20546/stock_barcode/static/src/models/barcode_picking_model.js#L1310-L1322 In particular, even if the setting says: Force a destination on all products. It should rather be interpreted as force a destination scan before validation. Note that a destination scan will not necessarily update a single line but rather all concerned lines at once: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/a220fc61d9076decdb987421df9330a1c2c20546/stock_barcode/static/src/models/barcode_picking_model.js#L1558-L1576 It is therefore a valid call to check if a location dest was scanned to determine if the a destination was set on each product before validation of the picking, even if it is just to confirm the default destination. ### Note 2: We modify the `_get_barcode_config` to only provide a `barcode_validation_after_dest_location` if locations re enabled otherwise users enabling the option without the ability to scan locations would be soft lock and unable to validate their picking. That same logic already being applied to the `restrict_scan_dest_location` config parameter: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/6afe02e3e836df2822d7cae8aebbd5bdde6b34cc/stock_barcode/models/stock_picking_type.py#L109 opw-6110690 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#115534 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#114429
This update resolves an issue where the Mod347 BOE export incorrectly included Spanish companies with invoices below the threshold. The fix removes an unnecessary search that was adding these companies to the export, ensuring only relevant partners are included based on the primary reporting requirements. This improves the accuracy of the BOE export for Spanish businesses.
Original PR description
Fix a bug in mod347 BOE export. Steps to reproduce: 1- Create an invoice with a spain Company, with an amount lower than 3 005,06€ 2- Add a Type for mod347 3- Create a cash payment 4- Export the mod347 BOE The partner will appear in the BOE with all line at 0. But this partner shouldn't be in the export. This is due because of a search on account.partial.reconcile, which add partners to the export if a cash payment is found in the period. But this search is not usefully as there is no legal indication that these partners should be in the export in this case, as the partners should only be returned by the main queries. Backport of PR #84317 opw-5960226 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#114672 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#110947
This update resolves a bug that caused crashes when sending invoices with attached images. The system incorrectly synced orphaned attachments, leading to versioning conflicts and data loss. The fix ensures attachments are properly linked during the printing process, improving invoice reliability.
Original PR description
Steps to reproduce: - Set a journal with documents folder sync. - Create and post a customer invoice. - Add an image attachment via a log note. - Click Send & Print. -> KeyError:…
Steps to reproduce: - Set a journal with documents folder sync. - Create and post a customer invoice. - Add an image attachment via a log note. - Click Send & Print. -> KeyError: `proforma_pdf_attachment` Cause: Adding an image via log note sets it as the main attachment, but it is intentionally orphaned (res_model=False) to prevent UI clutter. `documents_account` incorrectly syncs this unlinked file, creating a workspace document with a missing model. During "Send & Print", the official invoice PDF replaces the image as the main attachment. The document versioning logic intercepts this swap and attempts to re-parent the new PDF to match the orphaned document. This destroys the PDF's linkage to the invoice, causing a crash when the system later attempts to fetch the PDF. Solution: Since the base module now suppresses premature document creation during the message post, we explicitly handle the sync ourselves. We override `_fix_attachments_on_record_from_files_data` to iterate over the validated attachments and trigger document creation only for files that retained their `res_model`. We also add a check inside `_update_or_create_document` to strictly block orphaned attachments. opw-5930888