Friday, May 8, 2026
7 changes · saas-18.2
Resolved issues and error corrections
The navigation bar now correctly switches back from mobile layout when the screen becomes wider, such as after zooming out or resizing a browser window. This restores access to menu items and the app icon when there is enough space, improving usability for affected users.
Original PR description
**Issue:** In the navbar view, when a user starts in mobile view (narrow width) and then increases the screen width (e.g., by zooming out or resizing), the menu items and app icon do not reappear.…
**Issue:** In the navbar view, when a user starts in mobile view (narrow width) and then increases the screen width (e.g., by zooming out or resizing), the menu items and app icon do not reappear. The navbar remains stuck in mobile mode even when there is enough space to display the full layout. **Fix:** The navbar was relying on `env.isSmall`, which is only set during initialization and does not react to window resizing. This has been updated to use `this.ui.isSmall`, which is reactive and updates dynamically when the viewport size changes. **Before:** After resizing from mobile to a larger width, the navbar continued to behave as if it were still in mobile view, keeping menu items and the app icon hidden. **After:** When the screen width increases, the navbar correctly detects the change and re-renders, restoring the menu items and app icon as expected. opw-6107660 --- I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#263039
The Microsoft Calendar synchronization test now better reflects real usage by checking behavior after time has passed between creating or updating an event and syncing it. This helps ensure calendar sync fixes are properly verified and reduces the risk of regressions reaching users.
Original PR description
A sync test added with 48b212189331c3c94dff5764a672e9b12678d92b is not actually testing the fix as the sync is done with the same mocked time as the create/write whereas the whole point is to check the sync after some time passed from create/write opw-5212908 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#262479
Odoo now checks a key invoice identifier before using a fallback method to decide the electronic invoice format. This helps correctly recognize certain malformed supplier invoices as BIS3, improving import reliability without blocking them.
Original PR description
Some UBL invoices we receive both have a node CustomizationID signifying that it's a bis3 and a UBLVersionID 2.1 (which should be illegal). We don't block malformed bis3 invoices. But we should try to guess that it's a bis3 if it has the perfect customization. We can keep the fallback in case it's an unknown bis3 format. --- I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#263349 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#263285
This update adds coverage to confirm that products from a cancelled sales order still generate the expected delivery when the order is later settled through Point of Sale. It helps prevent empty delivery orders while sales orders incorrectly appear delivered, protecting inventory and fulfillment accuracy.
Original PR description
Steps to reproduce ------------------ 1. Create a sale order with 2 products, confirm it 2. Cancel the SO, then click "Set to Quotation" 3. Open PoS, settle the order and pay 4. Check the delivery…
Steps to reproduce ------------------ 1. Create a sale order with 2 products, confirm it 2. Cancel the SO, then click "Set to Quotation" 3. Open PoS, settle the order and pay 4. Check the delivery order linked to the PoS order The delivery is empty, yet the products still show as "delivered" on the sale order. Why it's happening ------------------ When the SO is cancelled, its moves go to 'cancel' state. After resetting to quotation, those moves stay cancelled. When PoS creates the delivery, the filter in `_create_move_from_pos_order_lines` checks `has_valued_move_ids()` which returns False (all moves are cancelled), and `not move_ids` is also False (cancelled moves still exist). So the lines coming from the SO are excluded from the delivery. The fix ------- We now also create deliveries for lines whose SO moves are all cancelled. These are lines coming from a cancelled SO that now need to be shipped after we have settled their order from PoS. Note ---- The commit c0f338711f028088c98ea459f27c1669b29738d7 fixes this starting from saas-18.2, by introducing a separate `pos_repair` module which simplifies the main `pos_sale` code. In 18.2+, only the test will be forward ported. opw-6055856 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#256693
This fixes the customer list so totals for "Total Due" and "Total Overdue" display actual amounts instead of dashes. It helps accounting users quickly review outstanding customer balances without needing extra checks or workarounds.
Original PR description
In the partner list view, enabling the "Total Due" and "Total Overdue" columns results in empty aggregates (—) at the bottom of the list. Steps to reproduce: - Navigate to Accounting -> Customers -> Customers - Add columns 'Total Due' and 'Total Overdue'. - Check the computed totals. Issue: The totals displays dashes (—) instead of the numbers. Analysis: The web client list renderer requires a currency field to be present in the view to correctly format and display aggregate sums for monetary fields, otherwise empty dashes are shown as fallback. opw-6169513 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#261820
Fixes an issue where the Purchase Orders smart button could disappear after changing an analytic account's plan. Purchase orders linked through analytic distributions are now counted correctly regardless of the selected analytic plan, helping users keep accurate visibility into related purchasing activity.
Original PR description
# How to reproduce - Enable the analytic accounting in the settings - Create a PO - Add a PO line - Set the Analytic Distribution of that PO line to an Analytic Account of your choice - Confirm the…
# How to reproduce
- Enable the analytic accounting in the settings
- Create a PO
- Add a PO line
- Set the Analytic Distribution of that PO line to an Analytic Account of your choice
- Confirm the PO
- Create a Vendor Bill from that PO and confirm the VB
- Go to the Analytic Account chosen before
- Change the Plan of that Analytic Account
# The problem
When the Plan is not set to the "Project Plan", the Purchase Orders smart button disappears
# Why
The Purchases Orders smart button is invisible if the variable purchase_order_count is equal to 0. That field is computed by a function that does a search with the following domain :
```py
[('order_line.invoice_lines.analytic_line_ids.account_id', '=', account.id)]
```
When we change the Plan of the Analytic Account, analytic_line_ids.account_id is set to NULL, so the search return nothing.
Why is that field set to NULL ?
Well, to reference its plan, an Analytic Line does not use a python-defined field. In fact, each time a new Analytic Plan is added to the database, a new column is added to the Analytic Line model. That column's name is x_plan{plan.id}_id or, for the specific case of the "Project Plan", it is account_id
When the Plan of an Analytic Account is changed, it takes every Analytic Line associated with that Plan and switch which column containing the id of the Analytic Account.
Take for exemple the following Analytic Line :
```
(account_id = NULL, x_plan2_id = NULL, x_plan3_id = 1)
```
When the associated Analytic Account's Plan is changed to the "Project Plan", it becomes :
```
(account_id = 1, x_plan2_id = NULL, x_plan3_id = NULL)
```
So, we need to adapt to search so that it uses the right plan's name.
opw-5897037
---
I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#248236The budget report now accurately displays data without duplicate analytic lines. This change addresses an issue caused by a recent performance optimization of the budget report query, which inadvertently introduced duplicate entries. The fix ensures data integrity and reliable reporting.
Original PR description
#### Issue: The budget report displays duplicate analytic lines. #### Steps to reproduce: In a new company: - Create a budget with one budget line (Analytic Account A). - Create one analytic item…
#### Issue: The budget report displays duplicate analytic lines. #### Steps to reproduce: In a new company: - Create a budget with one budget line (Analytic Account A). - Create one analytic item (linked to Analytic Account A). - Open the budget report and remove the default "open budget" filter. Duplicate amounts appear in the pivot view and duplicate lines appear in the list view. #### Cause: In #104299, the query in `_get_aal_query` was refactored for performance to avoid a single query with an OR condition in the LEFT JOIN. It was replaced by two separate queries combined with `UNION ALL`. This caused some lines to be captured by both queries, resulting in duplicates in the final report. #### Fix: Use three separate queries, each with specific filter conditions to guarantee unique results: Q1 - Analytic lines with no matching budget line. Q2 - Analytic lines matched to a budget line with no company (null-company). Q3 - Analytic lines matched to a company-specific budget line. OPW-6051696 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#116612