Thursday, May 28, 2026
14 changes · saas-19.2
Enhancements to existing features
This pull request includes performance optimizations across several Odoo modules, primarily focused on improving the speed and responsiveness of key business processes. These changes address identified bottlenecks and enhance the overall user experience. The update is part of the Odoo 19.2 release, ensuring a smoother and more efficient Odoo environment.
Original PR description
Description of the issue/feature this PR addresses: Current behavior before PR: Desired behavior after PR is merged: --- I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr
This update introduces a new EC Sales list report specifically for Hungary, providing more detailed sales data. Instead of grouping solely by customer, it now analyzes transactions based on transaction type (e.g., B, C) and transaction state (U or T), ensuring accurate reporting according to Hungarian regulations. This allows for a more granular view of sales activity.
Original PR description
This commit implement the EC Sales list for Hungary This report is a bit different from the main EC Sales list, instead of just grouping the lines on partner_id, we need to group on specifics fields on account.move: - l10n_hu_transaction_type: B, C, K, R or V This field represente the type of Intra Community Transaction, it's a selection field with all the legal possible values. We leave the field blank for normal transactions. - l10n_hu_transaction_state: U or T Represent if the transaction is a new one (U) or a correction (T) The grouping of the report works like this: groupby partner_id, l10n_hu_transaction_type, l10n_hu_transaction_state This mean for a single partner, we can have up to 12 different lines. [task-4950959](https://www.odoo.com/odoo/project/967/tasks/4950959) Linked:https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/pull/110448 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#253556
This update introduces a new EC Sales list report specifically for Hungarian businesses. The report now groups sales data by tax codes (B, C, K, R & V) instead of just customer ID, aligning with Hungarian tax regulations. It also includes the necessary tax return data for this report.
Original PR description
This report is a bit different from the main EC Sales list, instead of just grouping the lines on partner_id, we need to group on specifics tax.tags [B, C, K, R & V]. It also adds the tax returns for this same report. [task-4950959](https://www.odoo.com/odoo/project/967/tasks/4950959) Linked:https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/253556 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#110448
Resolved issues and error corrections
This update resolves issues preventing IoT drivers from receiving websocket messages due to startup problems. Specifically, it handles scenarios where the device initially lacks an IP or database connection, and ensures the websocket client starts correctly after a successful device send attempt. This enhances the reliability of data transmission from IoT devices.
Original PR description
This commit fixes several issues which can cause websocket messages to not be received: 1. If the IoT box does not have an IP when it first starts, the Websocket class will not be started (due to…
This commit fixes several issues which can cause websocket messages to not be received: 1. If the IoT box does not have an IP when it first starts, the Websocket class will not be started (due to `@require_db`). It will remain closed even if the IoT box connects to the network shortly after. 2. If the IoT box does have an IP but can't reach the database when it starts, the Websocket client will crash due to a missing try/except around the request to get a session from the DB. 3. If the IoT box fails the first `send_all_devices` call, the websocket channel will not be set when the Websocket client starts. This causes no messages to be received, since it does not subscribe to the channel. The changes are as follows: 1. The `@require_db` helper is removed from the Websocket client, and instead the server URL is provided explicitly. 2. Any exception raised by the session request is caught and logged, and the websocket can still continue connect attempts. 3. Instead of starting the websocket client after the first call to `send_all_devices`, it is started after the first *successful* call to `send_all_devices` so the channel is guaranteed to be set. 4. The closing status code is now logged as a warning instead of debug. This is to make it easier to troubleshoot websocket disconnections at a glance. --- I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr
This update ensures that backorders created during point-of-sale transactions are correctly linked to the original POS order. Previously, these backorders lacked a connection, making inventory management more complex. This fix streamlines the process by maintaining a clear link between the POS order and all associated backorder pickings.
Original PR description
The delivery transfer for a product tracked by serial number is not linked to the POS order when there is no available stock. When validating a POS delivery in real time, stock can split the transfer…
The delivery transfer for a product tracked by serial number is not linked to the POS order when there is no available stock. When validating a POS delivery in real time, stock can split the transfer into a completed picking and a backorder (e.g. one line fully delivered with lots, another serial-tracked line with no stock and no serial number). Steps to reproduce: ------------------- * Setup two products: one tracked by qunatity with some quantity on-hand an other tracked by SN but no quantity on-hand * Open Pos * Sell in one order, both products without providing SN * Validate payment * Open Inventory: two deliveries sould exist under Inventory Overview of PoS Orders > Observation: The first picking shows the POS order as Source Document but the backorder has no source document and is not linked to the POS order. Why the fix: ------------ Pos Origin (Source Document, POS order, session) was only written on the pickings returned by `_create_picking_from_pos_order_lines`, which did not include pickings created during `_action_done()`. Extend the write to the initial pickings and their backorders so every transfer stays tied to the originating `pos.order`. opw-6090606 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#266111 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#259370
This update resolves an issue where UBL imports with taxes set to 'price_include' were failing to correctly calculate and apply taxes, particularly for invoices with multiple items. The fix ensures accurate tax calculations and adjustments, especially when quantities vary, improving the reliability of UBL import processes.
Original PR description
**PROBLEMS** 1. On a company with taxes with price_include = True, we fail to retrieve a tax when importing a ubl. 2. The price_unit adjustement for when importing price-included taxes doesn't account for quantity. **STEP TO REPRODUCE** 1. Have a setup where the tax are only price_include. 2. Import a ubl, the taxes will not be retrieved. 3. Run odoo only with the fix for problem 1, and import the same ubl with some invoice quantity != 1 4. Notice the price unit are messed up for lines with quantity != 1 (odoo tries to correct the untaxed amount with a line, but this doesn't fixes the tax). opw-6159394 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#266107 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#262686
This update resolves a potential issue that caused Out of Memory errors during the installation of the `sale_subscription` module on databases with extensive sales order data. The fix ensures that newly added fields are correctly initialized to 'null' during installation, preventing performance bottlenecks and installation failures.
Original PR description
### Description: Installing `sale_subscription` on databases with a large number of `sale.order` and `sale.order.line` can cause Out of Memory (OOM) errors. The issue comes from two stored compute fields, `last_invoiced_date` and `plan_id`. Since these depend on newly added fields, they should default to `null` during installation. ### Reference: opw-6201267 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#118419 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#118008
This update resolves a printing problem reported by a client who was unable to print without LNA. The fix addresses a missing check that was causing errors during the printing process. This ensures consistent printing functionality for all users.
Original PR description
Based on the ticket below the client is experiencing an issue when printing without LNA. This PR fixes the missing key check opw-https://www.odoo.com/odoo/project/49/tasks/6232008 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#118101 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#118005
This update enhances the accessibility of carousels on our website, making them easier to navigate using a keyboard. Specifically, it adds visual focus indicators, pauses the carousel when focused, and supports 'home' and 'end' keys for navigation. These changes improve the user experience for all visitors, particularly those using assistive technologies.
Original PR description
[FIX] website: improve carousel accessibility To improve keyboard accessibility on carousels, the indicators container is not focusable anymore, and the indicators themselves now only have one…
[FIX] website: improve carousel accessibility
To improve keyboard accessibility on carousels, the indicators container
is not focusable anymore, and the indicators themselves now only have
one focusable button at a time.
The tab order is thus: previous button > active indicator > next button.
(The previous and next button may both appear before.)
You can still navigate among indicators with the left and right arrows,
which also moves the focus to the newly targetted indicator.
Note that other accessibility improvements remain to be done on the
carousels (add a pause/play button on auto-sliding carousels, place the
buttons before the carousel slide in the tab order, add some aria
attributes (roledescription, live), adaptative labels...).
[FIX] website: make focus visible on carousel arrows
When focusing manually (with tab / shift+tab) the previous/next arrows
in carousels, it is hard to follow where the focus is, because there is
no outline and the contrast is too small.
This commit adds a specific outline if the button is `:focus-visible`
(with both black and white to work on any background).
[IMP] website: pause carousel on focus within
Carousels are paused on hover (or touchstart), but if the focus is
inside one, it won't pause. That can make it hard to navigate within
interactive carousels during the sliding interval (e.g. the dynamic
products, which by default has 4 different products with 3 different
focusable links/buttons).
This commit applies the same behavior on focusin as Bootstrap's default
on mouseover, and on focusout as on mouseout.
[IMP] website: support home/end keys on carousels
When the focus is in a carousel, pressing the "home" key displays the
first slide and pressing the "end" key displays the last slide.
task-5470023
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#266428
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#244939This update corrects a bug preventing employees administrators from seeing the attendance smart button for other employees. The issue stemmed from how the system determined who could view attendance based on group permissions. Now, users with the necessary administrator and attendance manager groups will correctly see the button, ensuring efficient attendance management.
Original PR description
## Issue When logged in with a user who has the *Employee: Administrator* (`hr.group_hr_manager`) and the *User: Read his own attendances* (`hr_attendance.group_hr_attendance_own_reader`) groups, but…
## Issue
When logged in with a user who has the *Employee: Administrator* (`hr.group_hr_manager`) and the *User: Read his own attendances* (`hr_attendance.group_hr_attendance_own_reader`) groups, but not the *Officer: Manage attendances* (`hr_attendance.group_hr_attendance_officer`) group, the user won't be able to see their own attendance on their own employee's form view.
Additionally, a user without no Employee group but with the *Officer: Manage attendances* group could not see the attendance smart button on other employees form view.
## Steps to reproduce
1. Install *Attendances* (`hr_attendance`)
2. Set Marc Demo's groups:
- *Employees: Administrator*
- *Officer: Manage attendances*: unchecked
- *User: Read his own attendances*: checked (implied by Role / User)
3. Log in as Marc Demo and open his own form in Employees
4. **The attendance smart button is missing, even though Marc Demo has the group to see his own attendance.**
For the second issue:
1. Set Marc Demo's groups:
- *Employees: No*
- *Officer: Manage attendances*: checked
- *User: Read his own attendances*: checked (implied by Role / User)
2. Log in as Marc Demo and open another employee's form
3. **The attendance smart button is missing, even though Marc Demo has
the group to manage other employee's attendance.**
## Cause
There are two employee views defined in `hr_attendance`: `hr_employee_public_view_form` and `view_employee_form_inherit_hr_attendance`. The two views have different conditions under which the attendance smart button is displayed:
- In the public view, which is seen by users who do not have the *Employee: Administrator* group, the button is only displayed if the employee form is the one of the current user.
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/b13d831e4c3c27ec7756302270f78c15f576a296/addons/hr_attendance/views/hr_employee_public_views.xml#L9-L15
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/b13d831e4c3c27ec7756302270f78c15f576a296/addons/hr/models/hr_employee_public.py#L119-L123
**This means that a user without the _Employee: Administrator_ group cannot see the attendance button of other employees, even with the _Officer: Manage attendances_ group.** This view should take into account the *Attendance Manager* group.
- In the other view, which is displayed for users with the *Employee: Administrator* group, the button is only displayed for attendance officers.
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/b13d831e4c3c27ec7756302270f78c15f576a296/addons/hr_attendance/views/hr_employee_view.xml#L24-L29
**This means that if a user is an Employee Administrator, but is not an Attendance Officer, they cannot see their own attendance, even with the "own attendance" group.** This second view should take into account the _User: Read his own attendances_ group.
opw-6167399
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#263826This update resolves an issue preventing users from unreconciling SEPA CT payments with a 'pending' online status. Previously, the system incorrectly blocked this process, causing delays in bank statement reconciliation. The fix allows internal unreconciliation flows to bypass validation, ensuring accurate bank statement matching.
Original PR description
**Issue:** The account_online_payment module overrides `action_draft` to raise a UserError for sepa_ct payments belonging to a batch with a `payment_online_status` = 'pending' or 'accepted'. This…
**Issue:** The account_online_payment module overrides `action_draft` to raise a UserError for sepa_ct payments belonging to a batch with a `payment_online_status` = 'pending' or 'accepted'. This blocks the bank statement unreconciliation process. When `delete_reconciled_line` is called, it tries to set payments to draft and re-post them, despite it being an internal process not a manual user modification. **Steps to reproduce:** - Setup a 'sepa_ct' payment method on a bank journal. - Create a bill with a vendor with a trusted bank account. - Create a payment for that bill with a 'sepa_ct' payment method. - Add the payment to a batch. - Manually set the `payment_online_status` = 'pending'. - Create a bank transaction and reconcile it with the batch. - Try to unreconcile the lines on the transaction - Result: UserError 'You cannot modify a payment that has already been sent to the bank.' **Fix:** Pass a context flag to `action_draft` during the unreconciliation flow so that the validation is skipped when the call originates from the internal unreconcile flow. OPW-6080464 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#118206 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#117921
This update resolves an issue where Live Chat users were unable to access chatbot messages due to restricted access controls. The fix adjusts permissions to allow users with the 'Live Chat / User' role to access the necessary data, ensuring proper functionality of the Live Chat feature. This change was triggered by a previous update.
Original PR description
**Steps to Reproduce** 1. Install the **Live Chat** module in version 18.4 or above. 2. Go to: **Settings → Users** * Open your user and change the access rights from **Live Chat / Administrator** to…
**Steps to Reproduce**
1. Install the **Live Chat** module in version 18.4 or above.
2. Go to: **Settings → Users**
* Open your user and change the access rights from **Live Chat / Administrator** to **Live Chat / User**.
* Alternatively, create a new user giving him rights of the **Live Chat / User** group.
3. Login using the Live Chat user.
4. Open the **Live Chat** application and navigate to: **Live Chat → Sessions**
5. Open any existing session. The session and its messages are accessible without any issue.
6. In the search bar, click: **Filters → Custom Filter**
7. Select the field `Chatbot Messages (chatbot_message_ids)`. You will face the below traceback.
**Issue Description:**
The issue happens because `discuss.channel` records are accessible to users having the `im_livechat_group_user` group through the Sessions menu: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/459a775a066fe1465e53fc751045baed39f80118/addons/im_livechat/views/im_livechat_channel_views.xml#L310-L315
The field `chatbot_message_ids` is defined as:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/459a775a066fe1465e53fc751045baed39f80118/addons/im_livechat/models/discuss_channel.py#L165
This field points to the `chatbot.message` model, but access to that model is restricted to `im_livechat_group_manager` only:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/459a775a066fe1465e53fc751045baed39f80118/addons/im_livechat/security/ir.model.access.csv#L15
As a result, when a Live Chat user tries to use `chatbot_message_ids` in a custom filter, Odoo attempts to read `chatbot.message` records and raises an `AccessError`.
This issue started happening after the access rights changes introduced in pr : https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/201880
Specifically, the following ACL changes:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/201880/changes#diff-c1592d633a34db44a7cc2a527482cecc56127cbba72649e7318dcf63ccf477afR19-R20
**Solution:**
To fix this issue, added the group `im_livechat_group_manager` on the field `chatbot_message_ids` so only those user can access the field who belong to the group.
**Traceback:**
```.py
odoo.exceptions.AccessError: You are not allowed to access
'Chatbot Message' (chatbot.message) records.
This operation is allowed for the following groups:
- Live Chat/Administrator
Contact your administrator to request access if necessary.
```
opw - [6169395]
upg - [4274573]
Description of the issue/feature this PR addresses:
Current behavior before PR:
Desired behavior after PR is merged:
---
I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#264682This update resolves an issue where the 'Info & Tags' button was hidden in the mobile Documents app's kanban view. The fix adjusts CSS styling to ensure the chatter is always visible and accessible, improving usability for mobile users. This prevents a frustrating experience when accessing document details.
Original PR description
**Steps to reproduce:** - Go to Documents app in mobile - Go to the kanban view - Add some files and select one - Click on `Info & Tags` button in the control panel - Reload the page - Chatter is not…
**Steps to reproduce:** - Go to Documents app in mobile - Go to the kanban view - Add some files and select one - Click on `Info & Tags` button in the control panel - Reload the page - Chatter is not displayed but the button is still enabled - Switching to the list view properly shows it **Issue:** We have two conflicting css styling on mobile: - `overflow-hidden` was added for mobile to avoid multiple scroll bars - `min-height: 100%` which is due to the default `o_kanban_ungrouped` in the controller css This means that the element is present at the bottom of the page, but we can't get to it manually. When re-enabling the action we are properly moved to the existing chatter (but we can't go back to the top). Also the documents panel should have a single scrollbar to display all the records, but we still need a way to scroll the messages of the chatter. **Fix:** Set `min-height: 0;` for documents kanban to ensure the chatter is still visible and accessible on mobile by default. This makes the chatter take the full available height when displayed. original overflow fix: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/commit/945b9e2b1c6752bd905695aa40b0babcf38c50cd opw-6061993 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#118134 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#113168
This update fixes a problem where users weren't notified when an expense's payment authorization status changed (e.g., cancelled). The fix ensures that users receive timely updates, improving the accuracy of expense tracking and reducing potential errors. This resolves an issue reported by internal teams.
Original PR description
## [FIX] hr_expense_stripe: Fix error messages coherence Fix the incoherent punctuation ## [FIX] hr_expense_stripe: Fix reversed and expired authorizations Before this, when receiving an `issuing_authorization.updated` event, the event would be ignored and the user would never know that the expense had been cancelled opw-6210055 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#117257