Tuesday, June 2, 2026
13 changes · saas-18.3
Resolved issues and error corrections
This update addresses a requirement from the Peruvian tax authority (SUNAT) regarding delivery guides. Customers using the l10n_pe_edi_stock module were previously receiving errors due to a missing field for the carrier handover date. The fix automatically detects this error and provides a clear message to users to update their module version to comply with the latest regulations.
Original PR description
SUNAT R. S. N° 000108-2026/SUNAT and the GRE validation rules published on 2026-06-01 add field 34 "Fecha de entrega de bienes al transportista" (cac:LoadingTransportEvent/cbc:OccurrenceDate). It is required, and rejected with error 3617 when absent, only when the transport modality is '01' (public transport). Enforcement started 2026-06-01, so affected customers can no longer submit their delivery guides.
In our implementation the departure start date is equivalent to this date, so we reuse it instead of adding a new field. The node is gated to public transport to match the validation rule and avoid emitting it on private transport ('02') guides.
Because the new node only ships with this module version, customers on an older version keep hitting error 3617 from SUNAT. Detect that code in the SUNAT response and store an actionable message asking the user to update the module, instead of surfacing the raw rejection.
task-6266662
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#119038The WIP report now displays accurate information when using analytic items tracked only with projects. Previously, demo data was shown, which could mislead users. This fix ensures the report preview reflects the actual data configured for the analytic item, improving report clarity and usability.
Original PR description
Currently, when printing the WIP report, demo data is displayed if no product or references are provided on the analytic item. ## Steps to produce: - Install Manufacturing and Accounting - Go to…
Currently, when printing the WIP report, demo data is displayed if no product or references are provided on the analytic item. ## Steps to produce: - Install Manufacturing and Accounting - Go to settings and Enable Analytic Accounting - Search Analytic items and create a new Analytic Item by providing a description and amount. - Gear Icon > print and open the WIP report ## Observed Behavior: The report displays a product (laptop) with a demo reference. This becomes problematic when an analytic item is tracked only with a project, as it still causes product and reference data to appear on the analytic item. This can mislead the user. ## Root cause: After this [commit](https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/967ac550e38bab915180647dea6eccb2ae1b3b31), demo data values were added to the report to support report editor previews in the web studio. This helps users understand how the report will look while they are editing it. However, although an account analytic line is defined at [1], no values for fields such as products and references are specified on the form. As a result, the template falls back to the preview values provided. [1]- https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/d66bb0d7b550b11876dbc7b9d87f5b2adc17dd74/addons/mrp_account/report/report_mrp_templates.xml#L32-L53 ## Solution: Using `data-oe-demo` instead of removing the fallback data appears to be the best approach, as it allows the report editor to continue using demo values for the report preview, as shown at [2] **Before:** <img width="871" height="340" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/91897dbd-65d8-4f70-8f22-ea38b42ba28d" /> **After:** <img width="815" height="380" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/ffcf509b-f534-47a8-be1d-53a798995443" /> [2]: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/a739c6c03c6629bad80f3fe61b1035ce156d59c6/web_studio/static/src/client_action/report_editor/report_iframe.scss#L65-L75 opw-6151563 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#262517
This update resolves an issue preventing attendee imports on events with the default mail scheduler. The fix ensures emails are queued asynchronously, avoiding conflicts with the database savepoint system during import processes. This improves the reliability of attendee data updates.
Original PR description
Importing attendees on an event that has an `after_sub` mail scheduler (the default on every event) fails with `savepoint "..." does not exist` and the import is aborted.…
Importing attendees on an event that has an `after_sub` mail scheduler (the default on every event) fails with `savepoint "..." does not exist` and the import is aborted. [`_update_mail_schedulers`](https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/b2f3270271f6/addons/event/models/event_registration.py#L298) runs the attendee scheduler synchronously on every registration create. The scheduler commits after each mail batch, which is fine from cron but problematic during an import: since [29460b723f49](https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/29460b723f49) [`load`](https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/b2f3270271f6/odoo/orm/models.py#L884) uses a single savepoint for the whole run, and any commit underneath releases it, so the next `ROLLBACK TO` / `RELEASE SAVEPOINT` raises `InvalidSavepointSpecification`. When `import_file` is in context, trigger the cron like the async path already does so the mails are queued instead of running inline. Steps to reproduce: 0. Have Contacts and Events installed 1. Events > Events, create a published event 2. Open the event, Attendees tab > Favorites > Import records 3. Upload a file with new attendees (Name, Email, no external id) 4. Click Import => "savepoint ... does not exist", import fails Ticket [link](https://www.odoo.com/odoo/project.task/6124741) opw-6124741 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#260648
This update fixes an issue where invoices weren't sorted correctly on the customer portal based on their payment status. The fix ensures that invoices are displayed in the correct order – by whether they've been paid, not paid, or are in payment – improving the user experience and accuracy of invoice lists.
Original PR description
Steps to produce: --- - Install the `Accounting` module. - Create several invoices for a portal user with different payment states (e.g., In Payment, Not Paid, Paid). - Log in as the portal user. -…
Steps to produce: --- - Install the `Accounting` module. - Create several invoices for a portal user with different payment states (e.g., In Payment, Not Paid, Paid). - Log in as the portal user. - Navigate to the invoices list and attempt to sort by **Status**. Issue:- --- - Sorting by **Status** does not reflect the actual invoice payment status, resulting in incorrect ordering. Root cause: --- - At [1], the sorting field for Status is set to state, which corresponds to invoice states (Draft, Posted, Cancelled). However, the portal displays and expects sorting based on payment_state. Fix: --- - Update the sorting configuration to use payment_state instead of state, ensuring that invoices are sorted correctly according to their payment status on the portal. [1]https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/5b85287ec4ea9f1b51e0f33402900777dfeeb725/addons/account/controllers/portal.py#L46-L52 opw-6128998 --- I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#262976
This update fixes an issue where currency amounts in Arabic RTL (right-to-left) user interfaces were incorrectly formatted, appearing with the minus sign positioned to the right of the currency symbol. The fix ensures that currency amounts are displayed correctly, aligning with standard left-to-right formatting in Arabic locales, improving the user experience for Arabic-speaking users.
Original PR description
Steps to reproduce 1. Create a company with Egypt localization, currency EGP 2. On a bank journal, set Outstanding Receipt and Outstanding Payment accounts 3. Register a customer payment so the…
Steps to reproduce 1. Create a company with Egypt localization, currency EGP 2. On a bank journal, set Outstanding Receipt and Outstanding Payment accounts 3. Register a customer payment so the journal dashboard shows the Payments row with a negative amount 4. Switch the user language to Arabic 5. Open the Accounting dashboard Issue The Payments amount renders as "LE 5,000.00-" instead of "-5,000.00 LE". formatCurrency returns the string "-5,000.00 LE". In an Arabic page the leading "-" has no intrinsic direction, so the browser attaches it to the surrounding right-to-left Arabic text and visually moves it past the symbol. Sibling rows on the same dashboard render correctly because they already wrap the amount in dir="ltr", see https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/d0424f2ffcf99ee59befe288150f1643b3fa0112/addons/account/views/account_journal_dashboard_view.xml#L252 opw-6183749 --- I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#266742
This update resolves an issue where VeriFactu invoices were failing due to a problem with sequence numbers that included letters. The fix prevents errors by gracefully handling sequence values with prefixes/suffixes, guiding users to correct the configuration and ensuring invoices are successfully sent to VeriFactu.
Original PR description
**Steps to reproduce:** 1. Install l10n_es_edi_verifactu. 2. Switch to a ES company. 3. Create a customer invoice and send it to VeriFactu. 4. Enable Developer Mode. 5. Go to Settings > Technical >…
**Steps to reproduce:** 1. Install l10n_es_edi_verifactu. 2. Switch to a ES company. 3. Create a customer invoice and send it to VeriFactu. 4. Enable Developer Mode. 5. Go to Settings > Technical > Sequences & Identifiers > Sequences. 6. Search for the `Sequence Code: l10n_es_edi_verifactu` and open it. 7. Set a prefix or suffix using any alphabetical character. 8. Create a new invoice and send it to VeriFactu **Issue:** Traceback on sending Veri*Factu: `ValueError: invalid literal for int() with base 10: 'F260001'` **Cause:** The value returned by `ir.sequence.next_by_id()` may contain alphabetical characters (due to prefix/suffix), while the field `chain_index` expects an integer. The raw sequence value was directly assigned, causing the conversion to fail. **Fix:** Catch the ValueError raised by int() when the sequence value contains non-numeric characters (e.g. due to a prefix/suffix). Instead of crashing, surface a user-friendly error on the document telling the user to remove the prefix/suffix from the sequence configuration. **opw-6037528** Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#255473
This update resolves an issue where barcode scanning incorrectly displayed delivered quantities on sales orders. The fix ensures that quantities are accurately reflected when using lots, preventing backorders and ensuring order fulfillment is correct. This improves the reliability of the barcode inventory process.
Original PR description
Currently when user adds adds quantity in barcode using lots it leads to incorrect sale order quantities. ## Steps to replicate: - Install Sales and Barcode (no demo data). - Enable Lots & Serial…
Currently when user adds adds quantity in barcode using lots it leads to incorrect sale order quantities.
## Steps to replicate:
- Install Sales and Barcode (no demo data).
- Enable Lots & Serial Numbers in settings.
- Create Test Product with Tracking by Lots.
- Go to Inventory > Products>Lots & Serial Numbers and create 3 lots for the product.
- Update each lot’s on-hand quantity to 10 from the product page.
- Create and confirm a Sales Order for the product (lines: qty 3 and 2 units).
- Open the delivery in the Barcode app:
- Scan lot 2 > increase qty to 3 using +1 button
- Scan lot 3 > increase qty to 2 using +1 button
- Validate and go to the sale order.
## Observed Behavior:
The sale order delivered quantities are flipped and a backorder is created even though the quantity for the product is satisfied.
## Root cause:
The issue occurs because when a sales order is confirmed, the system defaults to
using lot 1 on the delivery receipt. When a user scans lot 2, the `_processBarcode` function is triggered, which calls `_findLine` at [1] to select the appropriate line on the receipt.
As the loop in `_findLine` iterates through `pageLines` with values like:
```
[{display_name: "Test product", quantity: 3, lot_id: { name: 'lot1' }},
{display_name: "Test product", quantity: 2, lot_id: { name: 'lot1' }}]
```
During the first iteration, `foundLine` is set at [2] for the line with quantity 3 . Since the subsequent if condition is not satisfied, the loop hits the continue block at [3].
On the next iteration, the line with quantity 2 causes `foundLine` to be overwritten at [2], and the continue block is executed again at [3].
This results in the line with quantity 2 being selected as the line to update at the end of the function.
When the user manually increases the quantity to 3, the line that originally required quantity 2 is updated and fulfilled.
Later, when lot 3 is scanned, the line that required quantity 3 is selected for update, and manually increasing the quantity to 2 before validating the order leads to a backorder and causes the delivered quantities to be flipped.
[1]:
https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/81eaeb4b18d849c644160234def6c69013591abe/stock_barcode/static/src/models/barcode_model.js#L1335-L1337 [2]:
https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/81eaeb4b18d849c644160234def6c69013591abe/stock_barcode/static/src/models/barcode_model.js#L1690-L1699 [3]:
https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/81eaeb4b18d849c644160234def6c69013591abe/stock_barcode/static/src/models/barcode_model.js#L1727-L1729
## Solution:
Avoid grouping lines from different moves unless using batch transfers. This ensures that backorders are not created when the barcode lines are fulfilled.
opw-5423943
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#117722
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#109032This update fixes an issue where SII invoices generated with quarterly tax periods were incorrectly using monthly formats. The change ensures that the generated JSON documents accurately reflect the company's quarterly tax periodicity, aligning with Spanish tax regulations. This improves data accuracy for tax reporting.
Original PR description
### Issue: When the company `tax_periodicity` is set to quarterly, the generated SII invoice JSON still uses the monthly period format According to the documentation, the options for Periodo include…
### Issue: When the company `tax_periodicity` is set to quarterly, the generated SII invoice JSON still uses the monthly period format According to the documentation, the options for Periodo include distinction between monthly and trimester (p224 - 225): https://sede.agenciatributaria.gob.es/static_files/Sede/Procedimiento_ayuda/G417/FicherosSuministros/V_1_1/SII-Descripcion-ServicioWeb-v1-1_es_es.pdf ### Cause: The invoice JSON generation does not consider the company's `tax_periodicity` This logic was probably omitted because `account_reports` may not be installed However, when the periodicity is configured, the generated SII document should reflect it correctly ### Steps to reproduce: - Install `l10n_es_edi_sii` and `account_reports` - In Settings, set `Tax Periodicity` to `Quarterly` - In Settings, set `Tax Agency for SII` to `Agencia Tributaria Española` - Change ES Company vat number to `ESA12345674` - Create an invoice (Date: 01/05/2026, Customer: ES Company) - Open the generated JSON document - Check the Periodo value, it should be 2T in May opw-6050587 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#264063
This update fixes an issue where currency differences were incorrectly aggregated in hierarchical financial reports. Previously, the reports displayed totals that didn't accurately reflect the actual values due to currency conversion. This change ensures that reports now accurately represent financial data, providing more reliable insights for business decisions.
Original PR description
opw-6015098 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#118705 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#114827
This update fixes an issue where UBL files weren't correctly applying tax rates during import. Previously, the system used a simplified cache key that could lead to incorrect tax assignments for similar lines. Now, the system uses a more precise key based on the invoice, line name, and partner, ensuring imported tax rates align with the UBL file data.
Original PR description
When we import a UBL file, we call the `_import_retrieve_tax` method to fetch taxes to indicate on lines.
During the process, we use cache to avoid performing the search a second time if a new line is the same as a previous one.
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/d0424f2ffcf99ee59befe288150f1643b3fa0112/addons/account/models/account_tax.py#L4459-L4462
The cache_key used is defined as follows: {line's invoice, line's name, line's partner}.
This implies that if two lines from the same invoice share the same name and partner, the same tax will automatically be used even if different taxes were indicated in the file.
This is not desirable as we should match what is indicated in the XML file imported.
opw-6226166
---
I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#266697This update fixes an issue where downpayments made in the Sale module weren't correctly reflected when processed through Point of Sale (PoS). The fix ensures that downpayments are calculated as a percentage of the remaining balance, providing accurate pricing at the POS. This improves the user experience and prevents discrepancies in payment processing.
Original PR description
**Steps to reproduce:** - Make a quotation - Make a downpayment of 50% for it - Go to PoS, make a downpayment of 50% for it - It will be a downpayment for 50% of the total price, even though it should be 50% of what's left **Why the fix:** Since 2736cf99f8f5e42b294366252d903111764ec352 the amount is now calcultated with the account helpers. But the flow with a downpayment that was already added to the SO in the Sale module was not implemented, meaning the full price will be displayed in the case of a % downpayment in POS. The issue is that the price of a downpayment in the baseLines will be 0, because the qty of a downpayment is 0 in the Sale module, and it's imported as is. So we first set it to -1 to make sure we subtract the price from what's left to pay. opw-6087777
This update resolves a potential error in the Hong Kong payroll calculations. Specifically, the system now checks for scenarios where a resource calendar is missing or weekly hours are zero, preventing a division-by-zero issue that could have resulted in inaccurate payroll figures. This ensures more reliable and accurate payroll processing for Hong Kong businesses.
Original PR description
. Add a check for a null resource calendar and zero hours per week. task-6229271 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#117685
This update fixes an issue where the ‘NABN’ document type wasn’t available when creating credit notes for GT companies. The change ensures users can now correctly select ‘NABN’ for vendor credit notes, aligning with GT-specific requirements. This improves the accuracy of financial reporting for GT businesses.
Original PR description
**Steps to reproduce:** - Install the `l10n_gt_edi` module and switch to a `GT Company`. - Navigate to Invoicing > Vendors > Bills. - Create a new vendor bill. - Observe that `GT Document Type`…
**Steps to reproduce:** - Install the `l10n_gt_edi` module and switch to a `GT Company`. - Navigate to Invoicing > Vendors > Bills. - Create a new vendor bill. - Observe that `GT Document Type` includes `NABN - Nota de Pago Electrónica` option. - `Confirm` the bill. - Click `Credit Note`, add a reason, and click `Reverse`. - Observe the available options in the `GT Document Type` field. **Observation:** The `NABN - Nota de Pago Electrónica` option is not available for vendor credit notes (`in_refund`), even though `NABN` is a GT-specific credit note document type. **Root Cause:** At [1], `NABN` is added for vendor bills (`in_invoice`, `in_receipt`) instead of vendor credit notes (`in_refund`). **Fix:** This commit ensures users can correctly select `NABN - Nota de Pago Electrónica` on GT vendor credit notes. [1]: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/c7fa8c9c6f6830f5702fab4f6efaf3ac33f7fe72/l10n_gt_edi/models/account_move.py#L159-L160 opw-6252256 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#118711