Daily updates from Odoo
Wednesday, June 3, 2026
5 changes · 18.0
Resolved issues and error corrections
This update fixes an issue where internal transfers could be validated prematurely without scanning the destination location. The fix ensures that the system requires scanning the destination location before allowing validation, improving data accuracy and preventing incorrect transfer processing. This ensures that all transfers are properly tracked.
Original PR description
Currently, when a user deletes a line and validates internal movement in the barcode system, the system allows validation even though specifying the destination location after each scan is required.…
Currently, when a user deletes a line and validates internal movement in the barcode system, the system allows validation even though specifying the destination location after each scan is required. ## Steps to produce: - Install the Inventory module - Go to Settings and enable Storage Locations. - Inventory > Configuration > Operation Types > Internal Transfers > Barcode App - Configure the Destination Location to require scanning after each product. - Create an Internal Transfer for Pedal Bin, demand 1. - Mark the transfer as To Do and open it in the Barcode app. - Add quantity using +1, then scan the barcode for the Pedal Bin(Barcode: 6016478556493). - Delete the newly added line and attempt to Validate. ## Observed Behavior: The system should prevent transfer validation when the destination location has not been scanned and display a notification to the user, similar to the behavior before user deleted the newly added line. ## Root cause: This issue occurs because when the delete button is pressed, the deleteLine function [1] removes the line, but the deleted line becomes the selected line due to [2] being triggered before the UI updates. As a result, the selected line is now undefined. Since the selected line is undefined, it fails to meet the condition at [3] during validation. This prevents notifications from being triggered and allows the transfer to be validated before the destination location has been scanned. [1]: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/3476d15bf8e75eb6530658dd623861b60963ab40/stock_barcode/static/src/models/barcode_model.js#L826-L836 [2] : https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/327d4478128f33fb2e0c477533bd4983178abf17/stock_barcode/static/src/components/line.js#L129-L133 [3]: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/6ff158ca3a6d2d2b3d285a7f8317622844811688/stock_barcode/static/src/models/barcode_picking_model.js#L945-L948 ## Solution: We can prevent users from validating if any line has an unscanned destination location when destination-location scanning is mandatory after scanning each product. To enforce this behavior, we can track whether a line has been modified and whether a destination location has been scanned and applied to that line. This allows us to identify which lines still require destination location scanning before validation can proceed. However, line state information is currently discarded and recreated on every save. As a result, information about lines that were updated and already had their destination location scanned is lost. This may incorrectly require users to rescan the destination location, even though it was previously scanned. To address this, we preserve the destination-scanned and modified state by carrying it forward from existing lines to their corresponding newly created versions using a loop. This ensures that destination location scan status is retained and users are not asked to rescan unnecessarily. opw-6069614
This update fixes an issue where the Balance Sheet report's XLSX export would incorrectly include all accounts instead of just the selected one. The fix removes a filtering process that was unintentionally introduced, ensuring the export accurately reflects the user's search criteria. This improves the accuracy and usability of financial reporting.
Original PR description
Steps: - Open Balance Sheet report and unfold lines - Open the General Ledger from a line with an account - On GL report, change date filter - Export XLSX report -> We export all accounts instead of the one selected in the search bar Cause: Since f8dceec74e44ffe4aef67655be8811c96da91eba we filter out the filter if a default account is defined in the context which is the case in the `caret_option_open_general_ledger` method Fix: Remove the filtering as the behavior that was fixed by the mentioned commit does not happen anymore. opw-6234427
This update resolves an issue where invoices from certain Peppol suppliers (using a specific XML format) weren't being correctly imported. The fix ensures that VAT information is always captured, allowing for automatic partner creation and proper bank account linking, preventing import failures and data inconsistencies.
Original PR description
Some Peppol emitters carry the supplier VAT in cac:PartyIdentification/cbc:ID instead of the BIS3-standard cac:PartyTaxScheme/cbc:CompanyID. The import then extracted no VAT, the partner auto-creation not available (needs name+vat) and invoice.partner_id stayed empty. As a side effect, when the XML also carried a PayeeFinancialAccount, the bank account creation crashed with a NOT NULL violation on partner_id. Fall back on cac:PartyIdentification/cbc:ID when cbc:CompanyID is empty, so the partner is found (or auto-created) and the bank account is properly linked. Steps to reproduce: - Create a XML with the supplier VAT only in cac:PartyIdentification/cbc:ID and a cac:PayeeFinancialAccount/cbc:ID. - Upload on a purchase journal: import fails, the bill stays empty with an error in chatter. - With the fix: partner auto-created, bill filled, bank linked. opw-6148974 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#261933
This update corrects a bug where taxes were incorrectly applied to COGS lines generated from vendor bills. The fix ensures that COGS lines, representing internal operations, are not subject to tax calculations, resolving a discrepancy between manual adjustments and automatic tax recomputation. This improves the accuracy of financial reporting.
Original PR description
Issue: After manually modifying the taxes on a vendor bill that generates COGS lines, confirming the vendor bill causes the taxes to revert to their original values before the manual edit. This…
Issue: After manually modifying the taxes on a vendor bill that generates COGS lines, confirming the vendor bill causes the taxes to revert to their original values before the manual edit. This happens because the product’s purchase taxes are applied to the generated COGS lines, which triggers the tax recomputation logic and overwrites the manually adjusted tax amounts. However, COGS lines represent internal operations and should not have taxes applied to them Steps to reproduce: 1. Turn on Anglo-Saxon accounting 2. Turn on automatic accounting 3. Make a FIFO product category and make the valuation automatic 4. Make a new product and set the FIFO product category on it 5. Make sure the product has a vendor tax set 6. Make a purchase order for 10 of the FIFO product category at $10 7. Create and validate the receipt for 10 8. Make a sales order for 6 of the FIFO product category at $10 9. Create and validate the delivery for 6 10. Create the vendor bill for 10 the purchase order created above (make sure that there is a tax set on the vendor bill; the vendor tax that was set on the product). Make this vendor bill set for 10 at $20 11. Edit the tax at the bottom of the total 12. Confirm the vendor bill 13. Notice that the tax at the bottom of the total changes 14. Reset the vendor bill 15. Remove the purchase tax from the product 16. Confirm the vendor bill again and notice that the tax at the bottom of the total does not change this time Cause: On confirmation, the COGS lines on the vendor bill will be generated and “_compute_tax_ids” will be triggered on those lines. Since COGS lines have a “product_id” set on them, those lines will receive the purchase tax set on the product. Setting the “tax_ids” on those COGS lines will cause tax computation to trigger again, which will reset the manually edited tax amount to the new computed amount. However, since COGS lines come in pairs that are equal and opposite in amount, the taxes from both COGS lines will cancel out, and the new computed tax amount does not change Solution: Skip setting the purchase taxes of the product onto COGS lines in “_compute_tax_ids” opw-6110692 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#265352
This update fixes an issue where overtime hours weren't correctly deducted from an employee's balance when an allocation was initially refused and then approved. The fix ensures overtime is always linked unless the allocation is in a 'refused' state, accurately tracking and reducing hours as expected. This improves the accuracy of employee time tracking.
Original PR description
**Issue** Employees extra hours were not deducted if an allocation was approved after being refused first. **Steps to reproduce** - Enable "Display Extra Hours" in settings for easier debugging - Have a Time Off type T: - Requires allocation: Yes - Deduct Extra Hours: True - Have an employee with some extra hours (e.g. by creating attendances) - Create an allocation using the time off type T - Expected: extra hours smart button on employee's page is reduced by allocation's duration - Refuse the allocation - Mark it as ready to approve - Expected: extra hours for employee should be the same as before the leave was refused - Actual: the allocation has not reduced the employee's extra hours **Cause** The overtime was unlinked when the allocation was refused. **Fix** Make sure an overtime always exists unless in `refused` state. opw-5959319