Daily updates from Odoo
Monday, June 8, 2026
10 changes · 19.0
Enhancements to existing features
This update improves the DEP7 export process by switching from PDF to JSON files. This change ensures compliance with German tax regulations (BMF RKSV) and allows for more efficient data processing by official tax tools. The new JSON format provides machine-readable data, streamlining reporting.
Original PR description
In this commit: ------------------- - Updated the DEP7 export to generate a zip with JSON files instead of PDF, in compliance with BMF (RKSV) requirements. - The export now produces a valid JSON document containing the machine-readable data expected by the official BMF tools. - The filename format has also been adjusted to follow common conventions (e.g. `Name_Duration_DEP_KassenID.json`). Task: 6071034 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#112276
Resolved issues and error corrections
This update fixes a calculation error in Odoo's Point of Sale integration with UrbanPiper. Previously, tax was incorrectly displayed on online orders with 'tax included' products. The fix ensures that the displayed unit price and tax-inclusive price accurately reflect the total cost, improving order accuracy for customers.
Original PR description
Steps to reproduce: --- - Configure Point of Sale with UrbanPiper credentials. - Sync a product priced at 100 with a 5% GST (tax type = Tax Included). - Place a test order. Issue: --- - Wrong calculation in order line: - unit_price: 95.24 - Tax Excl. price: 90.70 - Tax Incl. price: 95.24 - Expected: - unit_price: 100 - Tax Excl. price: 95.24 - Tax Incl. price: 100 Cause: --- - While computing the unit_price with Tax Included, the tax amount was not added back. Fix: --- - Ensure unit_price includes the tax amount when tax type is Tax Included. task-5031196 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#119314 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#92854
This update corrects an issue in the l10n_lu_reports module that caused incorrect balance sheet reports. Specifically, the XML files now ensure that fields 2955 and 2956 are always set to zero, as required by Luxembourg's eCDF reporting standards. Failure to adhere to these standards previously resulted in report rejections.
Original PR description
Before this commit, fields 2955 and 2956 in the balance sheet could be incorrect. 2955 must always be blank (not exist) and 2956 must always be 0 per: https://ecdf-developer.b2g.etat.lu/ecdf/forms/popup/CA_PLANCOMPTA/2020/en/2/rules page 116 + 117 If they are not these values specifically, submitting the XML to eCDF results in the report being rejected. Steps to reproduce: - Install l10n_lu_reports - Create a journal entry for a closed year (2025) that debits account 142000 and credits another account that starts with a 1 - Go to the balance sheet for 2025 - Download the XML for the report - 2955 is present and 2956 is either not present or is not 0 (behavior varies between versions) Ticket [link](https://www.odoo.com/odoo/project.task/6246564) opw-6246564 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#119193
This update resolves a performance issue that caused the Budget Report to time out on large Odoo databases. The fix optimizes the underlying SQL query to handle complex budget data more efficiently, resulting in significantly faster report generation. This improves usability for users working with extensive financial data.
Original PR description
**Description** Opening the Budget Report from any budget record times out on databases with significant data volume. The request to `budget.report/formatted_read_grouping_sets` consistently times…
**Description**
Opening the Budget Report from any budget record times out on databases
with significant data volume. The request to
`budget.report/formatted_read_grouping_sets` consistently times out,
making the Budget Report completely unusable.
**Root cause:**
`budget.report` is an SQL view that consists of 5 UNION ALL branches.
When the list view loads, the ORM translates the `budget_analytic_id`
domain into a WHERE clause on the outer query wrapping the full UNION
ALL subquery. PostgreSQL cannot push this filter through a UNION ALL as
it's a hard optimization barrier. It must fully materialize the subquery
regardless of which budget is being viewed.
**Fix:**
Override _search on budget.report to extract budget_analytic_id and
budget_line_id conditions from the incoming domain using the Domain API.
budget_line_id is rewritten as Domain('id', op, value) so _to_sql()
correctly emits bl.id in the raw SQL. The resulting domain is injected
in context under budget_line_domain and read in _get_bl_query,
_get_aal_query (base module), and _get_pol_query (purchase module) to
filter budget_line rows inside each branch's LEFT JOIN ON clause.
This also removes the budget_report_budget_line_ids context key from
budget_line._compute_all, unifying both filters under one mechanism.
---
On customer DB (568k `account_analytic_line`, 27k `budget_line`,
116k confirmed `purchase_order_line`, 114k posted vendor bill lines
with purchase link):
| Budget | Before | After |
|---|---|---|
| 8 lines, 730d span | timeout | 2.27s |
| 14 lines | timeout | 2.39s |
| 14 lines, 1095d span | timeout | 1.63s |
- Before: https://explain.dalibo.com/plan/ehed5eb8de251426
- After: https://explain.dalibo.com/plan/db8aef35cag9hg6f
opw-6098047This update resolves an issue where the EC List XML export incorrectly treated invoices with the same VAT number as separate partners, leading to rejection by the Belgian tax agency. The fix ensures that invoices with identical VATs are grouped together in the XML, meeting regulatory requirements. This prevents errors and ensures accurate tax reporting.
Original PR description
With l10n_be: - Create two contacts with the same VAT - Create an invoice for each that is EC List compatible - Generate the return and export the EC List XML In the generated xml the two partners with the same vat are treated as different partners, which causes a rejection by the tax agency. opw-6109585
This update resolves an issue where scanning a package type alongside a regular package didn't correctly link the new package to the product, preventing it from appearing in the inventory. The fix ensures that scanning a package type creates a new package and associates it with the correct product, improving the barcode scanning workflow.
Original PR description
When scanning a package then a package type, from the point of view of the user nothing happend, and in the backend it will created a new package but it will not link it to the products nor will it…
When scanning a package then a package type, from the point of view of the user nothing happend, and in the backend it will created a new package but it will not link it to the products nor will it show any warning. Steps to reproduce: ------------------- * Install barcode and stock * Enable packages in settings * Open Inventory * Create a product, * Create a Package Type -> barcode PACKTYPE, * Create a Package linked to this package type -> PACK, * Add at least 2 unit of product to this package, * Create a delivery for 2 unit of the product, Open Barcode * Operation > Delivery orders > your delivery * Erase the destination package from the first line * Scan PACK ( don't click on the green line) * Scan PACKTYPE **Actual behavior** create a new package but does not link it to the new products **Expected behavior** create a new package and set it as destination package. Observation: ------------- When scanning the package (PACK), we will go through ```_processPackage``` -> ```async _processPackage``` where in the end the line is unselected: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/39d8a473fe03038ca0494a6a8165e3eb75bd8492/stock_barcode/static/src/models/barcode_picking_model.js#L2090 When we scan our package type (PACKTYPE), we will go to ``` _processPackage``` -> ```_processPackage```->```_processPackageType``` where we will obtains packagesIds checking that we have a source package: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/7cd9834d1d918f12dec43844cae6f112309e5772/stock_barcode/static/src/models/barcode_picking_model.js#L2123-L2132 and will send us to ```_putPackInPack```: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/7cd9834d1d918f12dec43844cae6f112309e5772/stock_barcode/static/src/models/barcode_picking_model.js#L2133-L2136 Where we will avoid the empty packageIds since we checked on the source package and not the destination package: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/2b887d094c66be7aebd92fbf735b1852f5dde4b5/stock_barcode/static/src/models/barcode_picking_model.js#L2296-L2299 and will call ```action_put_in_pack``` from the packaging model: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/2b887d094c66be7aebd92fbf735b1852f5dde4b5/stock_barcode/static/src/models/barcode_picking_model.js#L2301-L2306 In ```action_put_in_pack``` will create a new packaging and put it as a the new destination package, but since the ```previous_dest_package``` (saved in db) was itself, he will [erase the link](https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/cda011dc8590773f6c3a26f4ae9d5242a3147024/addons/stock/models/stock_package.py#L354-L363) he just made. Which means that in our case, we created a package without linking it to anything. Even if we avoid the function to erase the destination package, since the destination package shown in barcode is the one from move line : https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/d0d0a3cf4a02bf24cf502b533e494fe7ca155eb3/stock_barcode/static/src/components/line.js#L115-L117 It will not show the new package in barcode opw-5449729
This update resolves a critical issue preventing correct receipt printing in Austria by accurately calculating the closing receipt offset. It also addresses a deadlock during authentication with Fiskaly and FON, ensuring smoother and more reliable operation. This improves the user experience for Austrian POS users.
Original PR description
In this task: -------------- - Fixed Austria closing receipt printing by calculating the offset from the last closed month instead of the current month. Closing records are returned in ascending order and exist only for completed months, so the latest month must use offset 0. - Prevent a deadlock during Fiskaly and FON authentication by checking for open sessions before starting any authentication flow, instead of after the first step of authentication. - The resp was used to show error which was not in the scope. task: 5420256 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#102313
This update fixes a bug that allowed internal transfer validations to proceed without scanning the destination location. Previously, deleting a line would cause validation to succeed even if the location hadn't been scanned. The fix ensures that validation is blocked until the destination location is properly scanned, improving data accuracy and preventing incorrect transfer processing.
Original PR description
Currently, when a user deletes a line and validates internal movement in the barcode system, the system allows validation even though specifying the destination location after each scan is required.…
Currently, when a user deletes a line and validates internal movement in the barcode system, the system allows validation even though specifying the destination location after each scan is required. ## Steps to produce: - Install the Inventory module - Go to Settings and enable Storage Locations. - Inventory > Configuration > Operation Types > Internal Transfers > Barcode App - Configure the Destination Location to require scanning after each product. - Create an Internal Transfer for Pedal Bin, demand 1. - Mark the transfer as To Do and open it in the Barcode app. - Add quantity using +1, then scan the barcode for the Pedal Bin(Barcode: 6016478556493). - Delete the newly added line and attempt to Validate. ## Observed Behavior: The system should prevent transfer validation when the destination location has not been scanned and display a notification to the user, similar to the behavior before user deleted the newly added line. ## Root cause: This issue occurs because when the delete button is pressed, the deleteLine function [1] removes the line, but the deleted line becomes the selected line due to [2] being triggered before the UI updates. As a result, the selected line is now undefined. Since the selected line is undefined, it fails to meet the condition at [3] during validation. This prevents notifications from being triggered and allows the transfer to be validated before the destination location has been scanned. [1]: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/3476d15bf8e75eb6530658dd623861b60963ab40/stock_barcode/static/src/models/barcode_model.js#L826-L836 [2] : https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/327d4478128f33fb2e0c477533bd4983178abf17/stock_barcode/static/src/components/line.js#L129-L133 [3]: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/6ff158ca3a6d2d2b3d285a7f8317622844811688/stock_barcode/static/src/models/barcode_picking_model.js#L945-L948 ## Solution: We can prevent users from validating if any line has an unscanned destination location when destination-location scanning is mandatory after scanning each product. To enforce this behavior, we can track whether a line has been modified and whether a destination location has been scanned and applied to that line. This allows us to identify which lines still require destination location scanning before validation can proceed. However, line state information is currently discarded and recreated on every save. As a result, information about lines that were updated and already had their destination location scanned is lost. This may incorrectly require users to rescan the destination location, even though it was previously scanned. To address this, we preserve the destination-scanned and modified state by carrying it forward from existing lines to their corresponding newly created versions using a loop. This ensures that destination location scan status is retained and users are not asked to rescan unnecessarily. opw-6069614 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#119363 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#113618
This update fixes a potential problem where users could accidentally trigger mass email campaigns bypassing intended filters. The change prevents users from directly retrying failed mailings linked to marketing automation, reducing the risk of unintended spam and ensuring campaigns target the correct audience. A user error prevention and a new test have been added.
Original PR description
When a mailing is managed by a marketing automation campaign, its target domain is dynamically handled by the campaign's activities. If a user clicks the "Retry" button directly on the mailing…
When a mailing is managed by a marketing automation campaign, its target domain is dynamically handled by the campaign's activities. If a user clicks the "Retry" button directly on the mailing template, it bypasses the campaign filters and queues the mailing for the entire target model, causing unintended mass spam. This commit fixes the issue by: 1. Raising a UserError in `action_retry_failed` if the mailing is linked to marketing automation (`use_in_marketing_automation`). 2. Hiding the "Retry" button in the frontend view to prevent confusion. 3. Adding a unit test to ensure this edge case is caught in the future. Steps to reproduce: 1. Create a marketing campaign with a filter and an email activity. 2. Run the activity and ensure at least one email trace fails. 3. Open the mailing template via the "Templates" smart button. 4. Click the "Retry" button on the template form. 5. The mailing is placed in the standard queue, bypassing the domain and targeting all records of the underlying model. OPW-6220106 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#119517 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#118759
This update corrects a bug where changes to the provider state on the Ticket Screen didn't update order filters correctly. The fix ensures that the Ticket Screen reloads with the new state, guaranteeing accurate order filtering within the UrbanPiper integration. This prevents outdated order information from being displayed.
Original PR description
Steps to Reproduce ------------------------- - Install Point of Sale and configure UrbanPiper. - Open a POS session and select a provider state from the notification popup to review orders. - While on the Ticket Screen, select a different provider state to review other orders. Issue ------- - Orders are not updated according to the newly selected state. - Previously applied filters remain unchanged. Cause -------- - Since the user is already on the Ticket Screen, changing only the provider state does not trigger a re-render. - The page was already rendered with the old filters. Fix ---- - The Ticket Screen is first switched away and then re-rendered. - This forces the screen to reload with the updated state and filters. Task: 6079663 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#104546