Wednesday, June 10, 2026
6 changes · saas-18.2
Resolved issues and error corrections
This update resolves an issue where both units of a quality check would be incorrectly moved to the failure location after a partial failure. The fix ensures that the destination of a move line is only updated when there's no remaining demand, preventing unintended movement to the failure location. This improves the accuracy of quality control processes.
Original PR description
Version: ---------- - 18.0+ Steps to reproduce: ------------------- 1. Install *quality_control* module. 2. Go to *Settings* and enable *Storage Locations*. 3. Open Quality module go to the Quality…
Version:
----------
- 18.0+
Steps to reproduce:
-------------------
1. Install *quality_control* module.
2. Go to *Settings* and enable *Storage Locations*.
3. Open Quality module go to the Quality control -> Quality points
4. Create a *Quality Point* with:
* *Product* set.
* *Control per* set to *Quantity*.
* *Operation* set to *Receipts*.
* *Failure Location* set to *WH/Stock/Shelf1*.
5. Create a *Receipt* with demand of *2 units* for the product used in QP.
6. Mark the quality check as *To Do*.
7. Update the *Done Quantity* to *1*.
8. Open the quality check and click *Fail*.
9. Update the *Done Quantity* back to *2* and save.
10. Open the quality check again, click *Pass*, and validate the receipt.
11. Open the *Detailed Operations* to inspect move lines.
Issue:
------
* Both units (failed and passed) are moved to the *failure location*.
Cause:
------
When a user fails a move line via the QC wizard, the flow is:
do_fail() → show_failure_message() → confirm_fail()
→ check._move_to_failure_location(failure_location_id, failed_qty)
Inside `_move_to_failure_location`, when `failed_qty == move_line.quantity`,
the condition:
https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/a33f580455a54a81d89a848f7b493d9dcc9ba2b2/quality_control/models/quality.py#L458
e.g. 1 == 1
was True even when `move.product_uom_qty = 2` (demand still 2). It only
compared the done quantities, ignoring that unfulfilled demand remained.
As a result, `move.location_dest_id` was set to the failure location.
Later, when the user increases the quantity from 1 to 2 on the move form,
the flow is:
_set_quantity → process_increase → _set_quantity_done → _prepare_move_line_vals
In `_prepare_move_line_vals` :
'location_dest_id': self.location_dest_id.id,
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/47bf284e1e9d8be0d4255418e0a3f67c74fa5114/addons/stock/models/stock_move.py#L1688
The new move line inherits `move.location_dest_id` directly, which at this
point is already the failure location.
When the user then calls `do_pass()` on the second unit, `do_pass()` only
writes `quality_state = 'pass'` and never touches `location_dest_id`. So
the second (passed) move line silently retains the failure location.
Solution:
---------
Add the guard `move.product_uom_qty <= move_line.quantity` to the condition
so the entire move's destination is only redirected when there is genuinely
no remaining unfulfilled demand:
When demand > done qty, the else-branch runs instead: it reduces the
original move's demand and creates a new separate move pointing to the
failure location, leaving the original move's `location_dest_id` pointing
to stock. Any subsequent move lines created on the original move therefore
correctly inherit the stock destination.
---
opw-6080871
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#112859A recent update caused the Asset Depreciation Schedule report to crash when dealing with many assets grouped together. This fix ensures the report handles empty asset values correctly, preventing errors and allowing customers to generate reports without interruption. The change aligns with existing safeguards to ensure data integrity.
Original PR description
#### Description of the issue/feature this PR addresses: Opening the Asset Depreciation Schedule report with a period comparison enabled crashes with KeyError: 'no_format' when prefix grouping is…
#### Description of the issue/feature this PR addresses:
Opening the Asset Depreciation Schedule report with a period comparison enabled crashes with KeyError: 'no_format' when prefix grouping is active (large number of assets in one account group). The report becomes unusable for affected customers.
#### Current behavior before PR:
_regroup_lines_by_name_prefix sums each subline column by indexing prefix_subline['columns'][i]['no_format'] directly. Empty columns are built as {} by _build_column_dict (both col_value and col_data are None), so they have no 'no_format' key. With a comparison period enabled, an asset that has no value in the comparison period produces an empty column for that period; once prefix grouping fires (len(lines) >= prefix_groups_threshold, default 4000), the direct lookup hits that empty dict and raises KeyError: 'no_format'.
#### Desired behavior after PR is merged:
The prefix group total treats a missing 'no_format' as 0, matching the sibling caller in account_asset/models/account_assets_report.py that already guards with .get('no_format', 0). The report builds without crashing and the empty comparison column contributes 0 to the prefix group total.
opw-6225639
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#119088This update fixes a bug where untaxed invoice lines in German accounting reports incorrectly inherited the Datev code from the previous line. This resulted in inaccurate Datev reports, which are crucial for compliance. The fix ensures untaxed lines have the correct, empty Datev code, improving report accuracy and reliability.
Original PR description
**PROBLEM** Untaxed move lines would take the datev code of the previous line instead of having no datev code like they should. **STEP TO REPRODUCE** 1. On a german company, create an invoice with a line with tax 19% I, and a line that is untaxed (with a non-null price). 2. On the general ledger, generate the datev zip. 3. Unzip, and open the account entries csv, and notice the 2nd line of the invoice as the datev code set to something instead of it being empty (column BU-Schlüssel). opw-6141003 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#118486
This update resolves an error that occurred when creating payment reports for Swiss companies using the ‘l10n_ch_hr_payroll’ module. The issue stemmed from a missing module dependency, causing a value error during report generation. This fix ensures the payment report functionality works correctly for all company types.
Original PR description
*=l10n_ch_hr_payroll,hr_payroll_account_iso20022 When clicking the create payment report button on a payslip for a Swiss company, a traceback occurs if the ``hr_payroll_account_iso20022`` module is…
*=l10n_ch_hr_payroll,hr_payroll_account_iso20022 When clicking the create payment report button on a payslip for a Swiss company, a traceback occurs if the ``hr_payroll_account_iso20022`` module is not installed. Steps to reproduce the error: - Install ``l10n_ch_hr_payroll`` module - Switch to CH Company - Create an Employee and running contract for it - Go to Payroll > Payslip > All payslips > Create a new payslip > Set the employee > Confirm > Create payment report Traceback: ```py ValueError: Wrong value for hr.payroll.payment.report.wizard.export_format: 'iso20022_ch' ``` https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/7792926504a823590fbbe574a96994002a92fc17/l10n_ch_hr_payroll/models/hr_payslip.py#L383 https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/7792926504a823590fbbe574a96994002a92fc17/l10n_ch_hr_payroll/models/hr_payslip_run.py#L13 Here, ``iso20022_ch`` is passed as ``export_format``, However, ``iso20022_ch`` is added to the selection field in the ``hr_payroll_account_iso20022`` module at [1]. When that module is not installed, the selection value does not exist, leading to the above error. [1]: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/7792926504a823590fbbe574a96994002a92fc17/hr_payroll_account_iso20022/wizard/hr_payroll_payment_report_wizard.py#L11 sentry-7391832811 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#113277
This update significantly speeds up the process of adding and removing participants from marketing campaigns, particularly for large campaigns. The change optimizes how the system identifies and manages participants, reducing processing time from over 51 seconds to just 0.65 seconds. This improvement enhances campaign performance and user experience.
Original PR description
Replace search_read with search_fetch to avoid unnecessary _read_format call in backend context. Use OrderedSet instead of a custom _uniquify_list helper to get O(1) membership tests when computing records to add or remove from campaigns. Benchmark on a campaign with 115k participants: | Before PR | After PR | |:---------:|:--------:| | 51.71s | 0.652s | opw-6055334 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#119589 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#117656
This update fixes an issue where users could see financial budgets created in other companies within the Odoo Enterprise system. The change adds a security rule to restrict budget access based on company connection, ensuring users only see budgets relevant to their assigned company. This enhances data security and simplifies financial reporting.
Original PR description
**Steps to reproduce:** - Install the `account_reports` module. - Create a new company. - Navigate to Accounting > Configuration > Financial Budgets. - Create a new budget record. - Switch to another company. - Open the list view of Financial Budgets. **Observation:** The budget record created in another company is still visible. **Root Cause:** The model `account.report.budget` does not have any record rule restricting access based on company. As a result, users can see financial budgets belonging to other companies even if they are not connected to them. **Fix:** This commit allows users to hide financial budgets from companies they are not connected to by adding a record rule on `account.report.budget` opw-6083892 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#114771