Before this fix:
The credit limit warning calculation only considered credit notes but ignored outstanding bank payments 
when computing the partner's effective outstanding balance. For example, if a customer had a credit limit
of 1,000 and an invoice of 2,000 was created, then a bank payment of 1,500 was received, the warning 
would still incorrectly appear showing the customer exceeded their limit (2,000 > 1,000), even though the
actual outstanding amount was only 500.

After this fix:
The credit limit warning now properly includes outstanding bank payments in the calculation. Two cases 
are handled:
- Bank payments received but not yet matched to any invoice, these are identified by their open suspense
  account entry and deducted from the partner's outstanding exposure.
- Bank payments already matched to the invoice, the reconciled amount is read from the invoice's receivable
  line and deducted accordingly.

So with this fix, after a 1,500 bank payment, the system correctly recognises the outstanding amount as 500
and does not show a warning since it is within the 1,000 credit limit.

task-5427613

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#119829
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#118957

Issue:
Cancelled journal entries were visible in the "Journal Items to Reconcile" view (action_move_line_posted_unreconciled) because the action domain had no filter to exclude them. This caused reconciliation failures, no reconciliation happened, and the cancelled record remained in the view.

This regression was introduced during a refactor to allow draft entries in the reconciliation view, where the posted-state condition was removed from the domain:

Enterprise commit: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/commit/003cffabda7d91a6d10d58942ed972ca5e17366d

As a result, cancelled journal items also became visible, causing reconciliation attempts to fail while the records remained in the view.

Also, we are not allowed to reconcile cancelled move lines, and we already
have the validation for this [here](https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blame/a236f67776616f6facdefb0117a6ffdde9b7c84c/addons/account/models/account_move_line.py#L2627)

Issue is reproducible on runbot. Here is the video reference: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ojIDxHn5Yst8gVFy8JyhwtJoDSSSJsmK/view?usp=sharing

- OPW: 6247870

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#119017
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#118773

Currently, an error occurs when user tries to select a property field in auto field.

Steps to replicate:
- Install `sale_management` and `sign`.
- Open Sales > Products > Products > Open any product.
- From the Gear icon, Click Edit Properties and save the record.
- Enable Debug mode if you are using a version lower than 19.0 .
- Open Sign > Configuration > Field Types.
- Create a new Field > Give a name > Select model as `Product`.
- Select Field as `Property > Property 1` and click save.

Error:
- saas-18.3 and later:
```
  File '/home/odoo/odoo18/enterprise/sign/models/sign_item_type.py', line 57, in _check_auto_field_exists
    auto_field_value = record.mapped(sign_type.auto_field)
                       ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File '/home/odoo/odoo18/community/odoo/orm/models.py', line 5472, in mapped
    field = records._fields[field_name]
            ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
AttributeError: 'Property' object has no attribute '_fields'. Did you mean: 'field'?
```

- saas-18.2:
```
  File '/home/odoo/odoo18/enterprise/sign/models/sign_item_type.py, line 41, in _check_auto_field_exists
    auto_field_value = record.mapped(sign_type.auto_field)
                       ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File '/home/odoo/odoo18/community/odoo/orm/models.py', line 5744, in mapped
    if len(records) > PREFETCH_MAX:
       ^^^^^^^^^^^^
TypeError: object of type 'bool' has no len()
```

Cause:
- As the user gave auto fill field as a Property field the [line] called `mapped()` to access its value, this caused the error to occur.

- This occurs because `mapped()` expects a `recordset` (models.Model), but instead it receives a Property object, which does not have `_fields`.

Solution:
- Using `'allow_properties': 'False'`, the property fields wont appear in the list of field selection.

[line]: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/cdaeb79e1f623831fffa553dbb658698367c7e19/sign/models/sign_item_type.py#L41

sentry-7378769090

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#119535
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#113091

Refund orders use a display name based on the original ticket. The rectificativa was then submitted with a duplicate Serie/NumFactura and rejected with TicketBAI error 5040.

Steps to reproduce:
-------------------
* Enable TicketBAI for a Spanish company with POS
* Create an order and complete payment (TicketBAI sent)
* Refund that order from the POS and complete payment
* Open the new TicketBAI XML (downloadable on the order in the backend)

> Observation:
`CabeceraFactura` `NumFactura` matches the original sale; tax authority returns 5040 (duplicate invoice for same issuer/series/year).

Why the fix:
------------
The TicketBAI document `name` was set from `pos.order.name`, so `_get_tbai_seq_from_name` extracted the same numeric part as the original sale. `l10n_es_edi_tbai.document` derives Serie/Num from `name` via `_get_tbai_seq_from_name`. Refund POS names intentionally echo the original order label, so we derive the document name from the same components as non-refund orders (`get_reference_last_part()`), which is unique per receipt.

opw-6067965

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#257475

Steps to reproduce:
---
- Install `website_sale`.
- Create a product and from the Sales tab, add alternative products, making sure all products are published on the website.
- Open the main product on the website.
- In the alternative products section, open the editor, click the `brush` icon under `card design`.
- Under Actions > Buttons, click on the `cart` icon.
- Save the changes and click the `Add to Cart` button on an alternative product.

Issue:
---
- Clicking the `Add to Cart` button on alternative products does nothing.

Root cause:
---
- At [1], the `AddToCart` interaction uses the selector `.oe_website_sale button[name="add_to_cart"]` to find and attach click handlers. When the dynamic snippet renders alternative products, `startInteractions` is called on the `.dynamic_snippet_template` div. It searches for the button inside that div, but at [2], no element wrapping the button has the `oe_website_sale` class in the rendered product card template. So the selector matches nothing, and no click handler is attached.

Fix:
---
- Add `oe_website_sale` to the `o_wsale_product_btn` wrapper div in the product card template so the button becomes a descendant of `.oe_website_sale` within the injected content, allowing the interaction to attach correctly.

[1]https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/cbc446bfcaeeb4787cb512ddffbbeb2a154a6dde/addons/website_sale/static/src/interactions/add_to_cart.js#L5
[2]https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/cbc446bfcaeeb4787cb512ddffbbeb2a154a6dde/addons/website_sale/templates/snippets/product_snippet_template_data.xml#L95-L113

opw-6197375
---
I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#263253

Steps to Reproduce:

* Create a Hungarian company on 19.0 (or earlier).
* Configure NAV credentials through Settings.
* Upgrade the database to saas~19.2.

Issue:

* The upgrade fails while reloading the Hungarian chart template.

```python3

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/home/odoo/src/odoo/saas-19.2/odoo/service/server.py", line 1626, in preload_registries
    registry = Registry.new(dbname, update_module=update_module, install_modules=config['init'], upgrade_modules=config['update'], reinit_modules=config['reinit'])
               ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/home/odoo/src/odoo/saas-19.2/odoo/tools/func.py", line 65, in locked
    return func(inst, *args, **kwargs)
           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/home/odoo/src/odoo/saas-19.2/odoo/orm/registry.py", line 202, in new
    load_modules(
  File "/home/odoo/src/odoo/saas-19.2/odoo/modules/loading.py", line 502, in load_modules
    migrations.migrate_module(package, 'end')
  File "/home/odoo/src/odoo/saas-19.2/odoo/modules/migration.py", line 215, in migrate_module
    exec_script(self.cr, installed_version, pyfile, pkg.name, stage, version)
  File "/home/odoo/src/odoo/saas-19.2/odoo/modules/migration.py", line 253, in exec_script
    mod.migrate(cr, installed_version)
  File "/home/odoo/src/odoo/saas-19.2/addons/l10n_hu/migrations/3.1/end-migrate_update_taxes.py", line 7, in migrate
    env['account.chart.template'].try_loading('hu', company)
  File "/home/odoo/src/odoo/saas-19.2/addons/account/models/chart_template.py", line 181, in try_loading
    return self._load(template_code, company, install_demo, force_create)
           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/home/odoo/src/odoo/saas-19.2/addons/l10n_hu_edi/models/template_hu.py", line 11, in _load
    company._l10n_hu_edi_configure_company()
  File "/home/odoo/src/odoo/saas-19.2/addons/l10n_hu_edi/models/res_company.py", line 79, in _l10n_hu_edi_configure_company
    res_config_id = self.env['res.config.settings'].create({
                    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/home/odoo/src/odoo/saas-19.2/odoo/orm/decorators.py", line 363, in create
    return method(self, vals_list)
           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/home/odoo/src/enterprise/saas-19.2/hr_payroll/models/res_config_settings.py", line 39, in create
    return super().create(vals_list)
           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/home/odoo/src/odoo/saas-19.2/odoo/orm/decorators.py", line 363, in create
    return method(self, vals_list)
           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/home/odoo/src/odoo/saas-19.2/addons/l10n_hu_edi/models/res_config_settings.py", line 48, in create
    record.company_id._l10n_hu_edi_test_credentials()
  File "/home/odoo/src/odoo/saas-19.2/addons/l10n_hu_edi/models/res_company.py", line 107, in _l10n_hu_edi_test_credentials
    raise UserError(
odoo.exceptions.UserError: Helytelen NAV hitelesítő adatok! Ellenőrizze, hogy a cég adószáma helyesen van-e beállítva.
Hiba részletei: HTTPSConnectionPool(host='api.onlineszamla.nav.gov.hu', port=443): Max retries exceeded with url: /invoiceService/v3/tokenExchange (Caused by NewConnectionError('<urllib3.connection.HTTPSConnection object at 0x798a970f1fd0>: Failed to establish a new connection: [Errno 111] Connection refused'))
```

Cause:

* Since the introduction of the Hungarian tax migration using `account.chart.template.try_loading('hu', company)` in saas~19.1, upgrades reload the Hungarian chart template.
* When `l10n_hu_edi` is installed, chart template loading triggers `_l10n_hu_edi_configure_company()`, which performs NAV credential validation through `_l10n_hu_edi_test_credentials()`.
* The credential validation performs a live request to the NAV service, making the upgrade dependent on an external service. https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/saas-19.2/addons/l10n_hu_edi/models/res_company.py#L99-L109 https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/saas-19.2/addons/l10n_hu_edi/models/template_hu.py#L11

Fix:

* Bypass NAV credential validation during the migration.
* The migration only updates localization data and does not modify the configured EDI credentials.
* This prevents temporary NAV connectivity issues from aborting the upgrade process.

see https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/253556

opw-6253523
upg-4326247

Description of the issue/feature this PR addresses:

Current behavior before PR:

Desired behavior after PR is merged:




---
I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#268178

### Issue before this commit:
When reversing an invoice in a Peruvian company, the "Cancel Reason" entered in the credit note window is not propagated to the Peruvian EDI tab of the resulting Credit Note. Only the Credit Reason is successfully reported.

### Steps to reproduce the issue:
1. Download Accounting and l10n_pe
2. Switch to PE company
3. Create an invoice and confirm it
4. Create a credit note for the invoice with a cancel reason and a credit reason and click the reverse button
5. See that in the Peruvian EDI tab only the Credit Reason is reported but not the Cancel Reason

### Cause of the issue:
In the l10n_pe_edi module, the override of the _prepare_default_reversal method maps the l10n_pe_edi_refund_reason to the new move's values, but completely omits the mapping of the wizard's textual reason field to the l10n_pe_edi_cancel_reason field of the resulting credit note.

### Reason to introduce the fix:
To ensure the generated credit notes contain all required information for the Peruvian EDI (SUNAT). Mapping the cancel reason guarantees that the electronic document accurately reflects both the refund code and the descriptive cancellation text provided by the user.

opw-6238525

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#119610
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#118479

Steps to reproduce
---
1. Register a grouped customer payment over several invoices, leaving one of them only partially paid.
2. Register a second grouped payment over two invoices: the partially paid one and a brand new invoice.
3. Open the first payment, its "Reconciled Invoices" smart button now lists the new invoice from the second payment, which it never paid.

Issue
---
The smart button is built from the stored `invoice_ids` many2many, which shares its relation table with `account.move.matched_payment_ids`. After reconciling, the register wizard links the payment to its invoices with `lines.move_id.matched_payment_ids += payment` at https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/f726393267a28cedd5febd2106de17ae3838f3ff/addons/account/wizard/account_payment_register.py#L1212.

When the payment groups several invoices, `lines.move_id` is a multi-record recordset. Reading `matched_payment_ids` on it returns the union of the payments already linked to all those invoices, and `+=` writes that union back to every invoice as a `(6, 0, ...)` replace command. So an invoice already paid by an earlier payment spreads that earlier payment onto every other invoice grouped in the new one, including brand new invoices, which then wrongly appear on the earlier payment.

opw-6188013
---
I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#267968

### Issue
Since the introduction of the Tax Returns feature in 18.3, it was no longer possible to generate a Closing Entry as the button has been replaced by Returns
The Return mechanism implies that you need a Return Type in order to make a Closing Entry using the Validate button

Additionally, using the Generic Tax Report by default creates a risk in Multi-VAT environments, as it mixes taxes from all countries instead of isolating Peruvian taxes

### Cause
The new 18.3 accounting workflow requires at least one active Return Type associated with a country-specific report variant to display the Return options and process the closing entry Peru was relying on the Generic Tax Report, without a dedicated report variant
No Return Type was configured, which blocked Odoo's automatic VAT closing workflow and prevented the system from prompting the user to configure the required closing accounts

### Steps to reproduce
- Install `l10n_pe_reports` and `accountant`
- Switch to a PE Company
- Go to the Tax Report

Before the fix, no Returns button is available for any of the existing reports, making it impossible to use Odoo's automatic process to configure the tax accounts and trigger the closing entry

### Notes
This is fixed by creating a dedicated Peruvian tax report variant directly in Enterprise that inherits from the generic tax report A custom handler is added to force the domain filtering on Peruvian taxes only, and a corresponding Return Type is defined to restore the full closing entry process safely

opw-5978673

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#117891

## Issue
When scheduling a sign request, the request appears immediately on the portal for the requested signer.

## Steps to reproduce
1. Install *Sign* (`sign`)
2. Create and send a sign request
    - Signer 1: Any portal user (e.g., Joel Willis)
    - Use the clock icon to schedule the signature request to a future date
3. Log in as the portal user used in step 2
4. Navigate to Signature Requests
5. **The signature request already appears in the list, even though it was scheduled for a future date.**

## Cause
The portal filters the sign requests shown based on the `is_mail_sent` field, which does not properly reflect when the signature request is shared to the user.

https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/9898272f17809decf6c5bb4600aca46f9ffae6f0/sign/controllers/portal.py#L40

In fact, when scheduling a signature request, the `is_mail_sent` field is unconditionally set to `True`, even if the signature request will only be sent later.

https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/9898272f17809decf6c5bb4600aca46f9ffae6f0/sign/models/sign_request_item.py#L289

## Fix
Since the `"scheduled"` `sign_request_item.state` option introduced by https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/commit/ed8d5a653e01b1378f0020e2f7a7c2d39fadf3e9 in 19.1, we can easily filter out the sign request items that are scheduled. That state is automatically updated by the `_cron_update_state`, introduced by the same commit as the `"scheduled"` option.

https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/9898272f17809decf6c5bb4600aca46f9ffae6f0/sign/models/sign_request.py#L493-L503

opw-6227472

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#118491

### **Steps to reproduce:**
- Install Payroll and Attendance apps.
- Create an employee with a flexible working schedule and work entry source as attendance.
- Create an attendance record for this employee.
- Create and compute a payslip for this employee.

### **Observed Behavior:**
 Worked Day lines are not generated, and Basic Wage is calculated as 0.

### **Expected Behavior:**
Worked Day lines should be populated based on attendance records.

### **Root Cause:**
During payslip computation, [_compute_worked_days_line_ids](https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/4339010eb1e1633a67573d08e032f3922b0bec49/hr_payroll/models/hr_payslip.py#L1846) only generated work entries for versions having a `resource_calendar_id`  at [1]. As a result, fully flexible employees without a working schedule were excluded from work entry generation, preventing worked day lines from being computed.

[1]- https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/4339010eb1e1633a67573d08e032f3922b0bec49/hr_payroll/models/hr_payslip.py#L1890-L1898

### **Fix:**
Remove the `resource_calendar_id` filter when calling `generate_work_entries` in `_compute_worked_days_line_ids` so work entries are also generated for fully flexible employees using attendance-based work entries.

**opw-6146452**

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#117409

Scenario:

- set up turnstile
- with recent safari mac os or ios (reproduced from 26.2) go to
  /web/login page in a private window
- enter login and password and pass the turnstile challenge
- click on Log in

Result: nothing happens and there is an error in the console "An invalid
form control with name='' is not focusable."

Cause:

By default Safari has the Settings > Advanced > "Use advanced tracking
and fingerprinting protection" set to "in Private Browsing".

If this options is enabled in private browser or in all browsing, you
can't login to Odoo with turnstile because safari is preventing the
update of the element that is preventing to send the form:

<input style="display: none;" class="turnstile_captcha_valid" required>

When turnstile challenge succeeds, a value should be set to this input
that will unlock the form, the .value property is updated but the
browser Shadow Content is not (and if we remove display:none, the input
is empty).

Fix:

I've not been able to reproduce the issue without turnstile using same
situation and iframe. We don't know Safari heuristic but the unlocking
is working if:

- we use setProperty instead of .value
- we unset required
- we remove the input
- we display the turnstile_captcha_valid input before challenge

This fix replaces setting .value by setProperty, and add a failsafe of
unsetting required.

opw-5917286
fixes #247536

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#253367

Importing attendees on an event that has an `after_sub` mail scheduler (the default on every event) fails with `savepoint "..." does not exist` and the import is aborted.

[`_update_mail_schedulers`](https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/b2f3270271f6/addons/event/models/event_registration.py#L298) runs the attendee scheduler synchronously on every registration create. The scheduler commits after each mail batch, which is fine from cron but problematic during an import: since [29460b723f49](https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/29460b723f49) [`load`](https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/b2f3270271f6/odoo/orm/models.py#L884) uses a single savepoint for the whole run, and any commit underneath releases it, so the next `ROLLBACK TO` / `RELEASE SAVEPOINT` raises `InvalidSavepointSpecification`.

When `import_file` is in context, trigger the cron like the async path already does so the mails are queued instead of running inline.

Steps to reproduce:

0. Have Contacts and Events installed
1. Events > Events, create a published event
2. Open the event, Attendees tab > Favorites > Import records
3. Upload a file with new attendees (Name, Email, no external id)
4. Click Import

=> "savepoint ... does not exist", import fails

Ticket [link](https://www.odoo.com/odoo/project.task/6124741)
opw-6124741

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#267586
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#260648

## The Problem
When computing a future leave balance, `_get_future_leaves_on` triggers
`_process_accrual_plans`, which iterates period by period and calls
`_get_leaves_taken` at each step. `_get_leaves_taken` re-enters
`_get_consumed_leaves` with `ignore_future=True`, but other accrual
allocations on the same employee were not guarded by `precomputed_allocations`,
causing `_get_future_leaves_on` to fire again for each of them, launching
another full accrual run recursively. With N periods and K allocations,
total work grew as $O(N^K)$.

## The Solution
Adding `not ignore_future` to the guard prevents future projection in any
nested context where it is both semantically incorrect and the source of
the blowup.

---

## Benchmarks
*Tested on a customer database with an employee having 2 accrual allocations and
pending future leave requests 6 months out:*

| | Queries | Request Time | Improvement |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| **Before** | 220K | 145.0s | — |
| **After** | 2.7K | 2.8s | **-98%** |

**Note:** More optimizations could be done to reduce the queries to a constant. However given the current design, it would be a bit big change and the current performance is already acceptable.

**OPW-6115804**

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#261172

Steps to Reproduce:

* Create a Hungarian company on 19.0 (or earlier).
* Configure NAV credentials through Settings.
* Upgrade the database to saas~19.2.

Issue:

* The upgrade fails while reloading the Hungarian chart template.

```python3

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/home/odoo/src/odoo/saas-19.2/odoo/service/server.py", line 1626, in preload_registries
    registry = Registry.new(dbname, update_module=update_module, install_modules=config['init'], upgrade_modules=config['update'], reinit_modules=config['reinit'])
               ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/home/odoo/src/odoo/saas-19.2/odoo/tools/func.py", line 65, in locked
    return func(inst, *args, **kwargs)
           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/home/odoo/src/odoo/saas-19.2/odoo/orm/registry.py", line 202, in new
    load_modules(
  File "/home/odoo/src/odoo/saas-19.2/odoo/modules/loading.py", line 502, in load_modules
    migrations.migrate_module(package, 'end')
  File "/home/odoo/src/odoo/saas-19.2/odoo/modules/migration.py", line 215, in migrate_module
    exec_script(self.cr, installed_version, pyfile, pkg.name, stage, version)
  File "/home/odoo/src/odoo/saas-19.2/odoo/modules/migration.py", line 253, in exec_script
    mod.migrate(cr, installed_version)
  File "/home/odoo/src/odoo/saas-19.2/addons/l10n_hu/migrations/3.1/end-migrate_update_taxes.py", line 7, in migrate
    env['account.chart.template'].try_loading('hu', company)
  File "/home/odoo/src/odoo/saas-19.2/addons/account/models/chart_template.py", line 181, in try_loading
    return self._load(template_code, company, install_demo, force_create)
           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/home/odoo/src/odoo/saas-19.2/addons/l10n_hu_edi/models/template_hu.py", line 11, in _load
    company._l10n_hu_edi_configure_company()
  File "/home/odoo/src/odoo/saas-19.2/addons/l10n_hu_edi/models/res_company.py", line 79, in _l10n_hu_edi_configure_company
    res_config_id = self.env['res.config.settings'].create({
                    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/home/odoo/src/odoo/saas-19.2/odoo/orm/decorators.py", line 363, in create
    return method(self, vals_list)
           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/home/odoo/src/enterprise/saas-19.2/hr_payroll/models/res_config_settings.py", line 39, in create
    return super().create(vals_list)
           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/home/odoo/src/odoo/saas-19.2/odoo/orm/decorators.py", line 363, in create
    return method(self, vals_list)
           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/home/odoo/src/odoo/saas-19.2/addons/l10n_hu_edi/models/res_config_settings.py", line 48, in create
    record.company_id._l10n_hu_edi_test_credentials()
  File "/home/odoo/src/odoo/saas-19.2/addons/l10n_hu_edi/models/res_company.py", line 107, in _l10n_hu_edi_test_credentials
    raise UserError(
odoo.exceptions.UserError: Helytelen NAV hitelesítő adatok! Ellenőrizze, hogy a cég adószáma helyesen van-e beállítva.
Hiba részletei: HTTPSConnectionPool(host='api.onlineszamla.nav.gov.hu', port=443): Max retries exceeded with url: /invoiceService/v3/tokenExchange (Caused by NewConnectionError('<urllib3.connection.HTTPSConnection object at 0x798a970f1fd0>: Failed to establish a new connection: [Errno 111] Connection refused'))
```

Cause:

* Since the introduction of the Hungarian tax migration using `account.chart.template.try_loading('hu', company)` in saas~19.1, upgrades reload the Hungarian chart template.
* When `l10n_hu_edi` is installed, chart template loading triggers `_l10n_hu_edi_configure_company()`, which performs NAV credential validation through `_l10n_hu_edi_test_credentials()`.
* The credential validation performs a live request to the NAV service, making the upgrade dependent on an external service. https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/saas-19.2/addons/l10n_hu_edi/models/res_company.py#L99-L109 https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/saas-19.2/addons/l10n_hu_edi/models/template_hu.py#L11

Fix:

* Bypass NAV credential validation during the migration.
* The migration only updates localization data and does not modify the configured EDI credentials.
* This prevents temporary NAV connectivity issues from aborting the upgrade process.

see https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/253556

opw-6253523
upg-4326247

Description of the issue/feature this PR addresses:

Current behavior before PR:

Desired behavior after PR is merged:




---
I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#268178

Refund orders use a display name based on the original ticket. The rectificativa was then submitted with a duplicate Serie/NumFactura and rejected with TicketBAI error 5040.

Steps to reproduce:
-------------------
* Enable TicketBAI for a Spanish company with POS
* Create an order and complete payment (TicketBAI sent)
* Refund that order from the POS and complete payment
* Open the new TicketBAI XML (downloadable on the order in the backend)

> Observation:
`CabeceraFactura` `NumFactura` matches the original sale; tax authority returns 5040 (duplicate invoice for same issuer/series/year).

Why the fix:
------------
The TicketBAI document `name` was set from `pos.order.name`, so `_get_tbai_seq_from_name` extracted the same numeric part as the original sale. `l10n_es_edi_tbai.document` derives Serie/Num from `name` via `_get_tbai_seq_from_name`. Refund POS names intentionally echo the original order label, so we derive the document name from the same components as non-refund orders (`get_reference_last_part()`), which is unique per receipt.

opw-6067965

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#257475

Steps to reproduce:
---
- Install `website_sale`.
- Create a product and from the Sales tab, add alternative products, making sure all products are published on the website.
- Open the main product on the website.
- In the alternative products section, open the editor, click the `brush` icon under `card design`.
- Under Actions > Buttons, click on the `cart` icon.
- Save the changes and click the `Add to Cart` button on an alternative product.

Issue:
---
- Clicking the `Add to Cart` button on alternative products does nothing.

Root cause:
---
- At [1], the `AddToCart` interaction uses the selector `.oe_website_sale button[name="add_to_cart"]` to find and attach click handlers. When the dynamic snippet renders alternative products, `startInteractions` is called on the `.dynamic_snippet_template` div. It searches for the button inside that div, but at [2], no element wrapping the button has the `oe_website_sale` class in the rendered product card template. So the selector matches nothing, and no click handler is attached.

Fix:
---
- Add `oe_website_sale` to the `o_wsale_product_btn` wrapper div in the product card template so the button becomes a descendant of `.oe_website_sale` within the injected content, allowing the interaction to attach correctly.

[1]https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/cbc446bfcaeeb4787cb512ddffbbeb2a154a6dde/addons/website_sale/static/src/interactions/add_to_cart.js#L5
[2]https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/cbc446bfcaeeb4787cb512ddffbbeb2a154a6dde/addons/website_sale/templates/snippets/product_snippet_template_data.xml#L95-L113

opw-6197375
---
I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#263253

### Issue before this commit:
When reversing an invoice in a Peruvian company, the "Cancel Reason" entered in the credit note window is not propagated to the Peruvian EDI tab of the resulting Credit Note. Only the Credit Reason is successfully reported.

### Steps to reproduce the issue:
1. Download Accounting and l10n_pe
2. Switch to PE company
3. Create an invoice and confirm it
4. Create a credit note for the invoice with a cancel reason and a credit reason and click the reverse button
5. See that in the Peruvian EDI tab only the Credit Reason is reported but not the Cancel Reason

### Cause of the issue:
In the l10n_pe_edi module, the override of the _prepare_default_reversal method maps the l10n_pe_edi_refund_reason to the new move's values, but completely omits the mapping of the wizard's textual reason field to the l10n_pe_edi_cancel_reason field of the resulting credit note.

### Reason to introduce the fix:
To ensure the generated credit notes contain all required information for the Peruvian EDI (SUNAT). Mapping the cancel reason guarantees that the electronic document accurately reflects both the refund code and the descriptive cancellation text provided by the user.

opw-6238525

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#119610
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#118479

Steps to reproduce
---
1. Register a grouped customer payment over several invoices, leaving one of them only partially paid.
2. Register a second grouped payment over two invoices: the partially paid one and a brand new invoice.
3. Open the first payment, its "Reconciled Invoices" smart button now lists the new invoice from the second payment, which it never paid.

Issue
---
The smart button is built from the stored `invoice_ids` many2many, which shares its relation table with `account.move.matched_payment_ids`. After reconciling, the register wizard links the payment to its invoices with `lines.move_id.matched_payment_ids += payment` at https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/f726393267a28cedd5febd2106de17ae3838f3ff/addons/account/wizard/account_payment_register.py#L1212.

When the payment groups several invoices, `lines.move_id` is a multi-record recordset. Reading `matched_payment_ids` on it returns the union of the payments already linked to all those invoices, and `+=` writes that union back to every invoice as a `(6, 0, ...)` replace command. So an invoice already paid by an earlier payment spreads that earlier payment onto every other invoice grouped in the new one, including brand new invoices, which then wrongly appear on the earlier payment.

opw-6188013
---
I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#267968

### Issue
Since the introduction of the Tax Returns feature in 18.3, it was no longer possible to generate a Closing Entry as the button has been replaced by Returns
The Return mechanism implies that you need a Return Type in order to make a Closing Entry using the Validate button

Additionally, using the Generic Tax Report by default creates a risk in Multi-VAT environments, as it mixes taxes from all countries instead of isolating Peruvian taxes

### Cause
The new 18.3 accounting workflow requires at least one active Return Type associated with a country-specific report variant to display the Return options and process the closing entry Peru was relying on the Generic Tax Report, without a dedicated report variant
No Return Type was configured, which blocked Odoo's automatic VAT closing workflow and prevented the system from prompting the user to configure the required closing accounts

### Steps to reproduce
- Install `l10n_pe_reports` and `accountant`
- Switch to a PE Company
- Go to the Tax Report

Before the fix, no Returns button is available for any of the existing reports, making it impossible to use Odoo's automatic process to configure the tax accounts and trigger the closing entry

### Notes
This is fixed by creating a dedicated Peruvian tax report variant directly in Enterprise that inherits from the generic tax report A custom handler is added to force the domain filtering on Peruvian taxes only, and a corresponding Return Type is defined to restore the full closing entry process safely

opw-5978673

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#117891

**Issue**
Printing a credit note for a returned dropshipped tracked product could display the wrong lot/serial number on the invoice report.

**Steps to reproduce**
- Activate "Display Lots & Serial Numbers on Invoices"
- Create a product tracked by serial/lot and enable the dropship route
- Create two lots: "lot1" and "lot2"
- Create and confirm a SO for quantity 2
- Confirm the PO and validate the dropship for both lots
- Create and post an invoice
- Return "lot2" from the dropship picking
- Create and post a credit note for quantity 1
- Click on print -> The generated PDF displays "lot1" instead of "lot2"

**Cause**
While rendering `account.report_invoice_with_payments`, the report calls `_get_invoiced_lot_values` to determine which lot/serial numbers should be displayed:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/786c373d5ac8afdfb79eb7a7d69c5eb83b919625/addons/sale_stock/models/account_move.py#L31-L32 `invoiced_qties = 1` since the credit is on a quantity of 1 https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/786c373d5ac8afdfb79eb7a7d69c5eb83b919625/addons/sale_stock/models/account_move.py#L44 Three stock move lines are retrieved from the SO:
- the two original dropship deliveries,
- the return move for `lot2`. https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/786c373d5ac8afdfb79eb7a7d69c5eb83b919625/addons/sale_stock/models/account_move.py#L63 However, none of them are considered as `is_stock_return` because the dropship locations use `supplier` instead of `internal`: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/786c373d5ac8afdfb79eb7a7d69c5eb83b919625/addons/sale_stock/models/account_move.py#L72-L76 As a consequence:
- The two original delivery move lines each keep quantity `1`: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/786c373d5ac8afdfb79eb7a7d69c5eb83b919625/addons/sale_stock/models/account_move.py#L69 they never pass through the return handling logic: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/786c373d5ac8afdfb79eb7a7d69c5eb83b919625/addons/sale_stock/models/account_move.py#L77-L80 which would make it as -1 (since `qties_per_lot[sml.lot_id]` is 0 for the first iteration of `sml.lot_id`). Thus, it does not pass by this code (since quantity is greater than 0): https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/786c373d5ac8afdfb79eb7a7d69c5eb83b919625/addons/sale_stock/models/account_move.py#L87-L90 which would make it as 0.
- for the last one, `is_stock_return = False` as it should be, thus the quantity is 1 as it should be. The quantities are therefore accumulated as:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/786c373d5ac8afdfb79eb7a7d69c5eb83b919625/addons/sale_stock/models/account_move.py#L92

resulting in:
`qties_per_lot = {lot1: 1, lot2: 2}`
instead of:
`qties_per_lot = {lot1: 0, lot2: 1}`

The report then selects the first matching lot and stops: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/786c373d5ac8afdfb79eb7a7d69c5eb83b919625/addons/sale_stock/models/account_move.py#L94-L99

opw-6230281

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#266716

Steps to Reproduce
---
1. Open the Planning module
2. Create an open shift with allocated_hours
3. Click Auto Plan
4. Click Undo on the auto-plan notification

Issue
---
Undoing an auto-plan operation triggers recomputation of allocated_hours,
causing the shift to lose its original workload value.

Current Behaviour
---
When resource_id is set to False during undo:
- _compute_allocated_hours is triggered (depends on resource_id)
- _compute_allocated_percentage is triggered (depends on allocated_hours)
- Both fields are recalculated, potentially changing allocated_hours
  from its pre-assignment value

Expected Behaviour
---
Undoing auto-plan should preserve allocated_hours at its pre-assignment
value while allowing allocated_percentage to adapt to the new context
(open slot vs assigned resource).

Fix
---
Use protecting context manager in action_rollback_auto_plan_ids
to prevent allocated_hours from being recomputed when resource_id is
removed. This allows allocated_percentage to recalculate naturally based
on slot duration while keeping allocated_hours stable.

task - 4952149

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#119772
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#102864

Scenario:

- set up turnstile
- with recent safari mac os or ios (reproduced from 26.2) go to
  /web/login page in a private window
- enter login and password and pass the turnstile challenge
- click on Log in

Result: nothing happens and there is an error in the console "An invalid
form control with name='' is not focusable."

Cause:

By default Safari has the Settings > Advanced > "Use advanced tracking
and fingerprinting protection" set to "in Private Browsing".

If this options is enabled in private browser or in all browsing, you
can't login to Odoo with turnstile because safari is preventing the
update of the element that is preventing to send the form:

<input style="display: none;" class="turnstile_captcha_valid" required>

When turnstile challenge succeeds, a value should be set to this input
that will unlock the form, the .value property is updated but the
browser Shadow Content is not (and if we remove display:none, the input
is empty).

Fix:

I've not been able to reproduce the issue without turnstile using same
situation and iframe. We don't know Safari heuristic but the unlocking
is working if:

- we use setProperty instead of .value
- we unset required
- we remove the input
- we display the turnstile_captcha_valid input before challenge

This fix replaces setting .value by setProperty, and add a failsafe of
unsetting required.

opw-5917286
fixes #247536

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#253367

Importing attendees on an event that has an `after_sub` mail scheduler (the default on every event) fails with `savepoint "..." does not exist` and the import is aborted.

[`_update_mail_schedulers`](https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/b2f3270271f6/addons/event/models/event_registration.py#L298) runs the attendee scheduler synchronously on every registration create. The scheduler commits after each mail batch, which is fine from cron but problematic during an import: since [29460b723f49](https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/29460b723f49) [`load`](https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/b2f3270271f6/odoo/orm/models.py#L884) uses a single savepoint for the whole run, and any commit underneath releases it, so the next `ROLLBACK TO` / `RELEASE SAVEPOINT` raises `InvalidSavepointSpecification`.

When `import_file` is in context, trigger the cron like the async path already does so the mails are queued instead of running inline.

Steps to reproduce:

0. Have Contacts and Events installed
1. Events > Events, create a published event
2. Open the event, Attendees tab > Favorites > Import records
3. Upload a file with new attendees (Name, Email, no external id)
4. Click Import

=> "savepoint ... does not exist", import fails

Ticket [link](https://www.odoo.com/odoo/project.task/6124741)
opw-6124741

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#267586
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#260648

## The Problem
When computing a future leave balance, `_get_future_leaves_on` triggers
`_process_accrual_plans`, which iterates period by period and calls
`_get_leaves_taken` at each step. `_get_leaves_taken` re-enters
`_get_consumed_leaves` with `ignore_future=True`, but other accrual
allocations on the same employee were not guarded by `precomputed_allocations`,
causing `_get_future_leaves_on` to fire again for each of them, launching
another full accrual run recursively. With N periods and K allocations,
total work grew as $O(N^K)$.

## The Solution
Adding `not ignore_future` to the guard prevents future projection in any
nested context where it is both semantically incorrect and the source of
the blowup.

---

## Benchmarks
*Tested on a customer database with an employee having 2 accrual allocations and
pending future leave requests 6 months out:*

| | Queries | Request Time | Improvement |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| **Before** | 220K | 145.0s | — |
| **After** | 2.7K | 2.8s | **-98%** |

**Note:** More optimizations could be done to reduce the queries to a constant. However given the current design, it would be a bit big change and the current performance is already acceptable.

**OPW-6115804**

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#261172

Issue:
Cancelled journal entries were visible in the "Journal Items to Reconcile" view (action_move_line_posted_unreconciled) because the action domain had no filter to exclude them. This caused reconciliation failures, no reconciliation happened, and the cancelled record remained in the view.

This regression was introduced during a refactor to allow draft entries in the reconciliation view, where the posted-state condition was removed from the domain:

Enterprise commit: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/commit/003cffabda7d91a6d10d58942ed972ca5e17366d

As a result, cancelled journal items also became visible, causing reconciliation attempts to fail while the records remained in the view.

Also, we are not allowed to reconcile cancelled move lines, and we already
have the validation for this [here](https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blame/a236f67776616f6facdefb0117a6ffdde9b7c84c/addons/account/models/account_move_line.py#L2627)

Issue is reproducible on runbot. Here is the video reference: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ojIDxHn5Yst8gVFy8JyhwtJoDSSSJsmK/view?usp=sharing

- OPW: 6247870

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#119017
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#118773

Refund orders use a display name based on the original ticket. The rectificativa was then submitted with a duplicate Serie/NumFactura and rejected with TicketBAI error 5040.

Steps to reproduce:
-------------------
* Enable TicketBAI for a Spanish company with POS
* Create an order and complete payment (TicketBAI sent)
* Refund that order from the POS and complete payment
* Open the new TicketBAI XML (downloadable on the order in the backend)

> Observation:
`CabeceraFactura` `NumFactura` matches the original sale; tax authority returns 5040 (duplicate invoice for same issuer/series/year).

Why the fix:
------------
The TicketBAI document `name` was set from `pos.order.name`, so `_get_tbai_seq_from_name` extracted the same numeric part as the original sale. `l10n_es_edi_tbai.document` derives Serie/Num from `name` via `_get_tbai_seq_from_name`. Refund POS names intentionally echo the original order label, so we derive the document name from the same components as non-refund orders (`get_reference_last_part()`), which is unique per receipt.

opw-6067965

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#257475

Steps to produce:
---
- Install `website_sale` module.
- Create a product with a variant and add the images from the sale tab.
- Go to the product on the e-commerce and change the variant.
- Attempt to scroll through the product images (using the mouse wheel).

Issue:
---
- After changing a product variant on the eCommerce product page, attempting to scroll through the product images (using mouse wheel) has no effect.

Root cause:
---
- When a product variant is changed, `_updateProductImage` dynamically replaces the product image carousel DOM element (`#o-carousel-product`) by injecting new HTML and removing the old one.
- The old CarouselProduct interaction instance remains in memory, causing a resource and event listener leak on the detached old DOM element.
- The newly inserted `#o-carousel-product` element is ignored by the interaction service, meaning that the CarouselProduct interaction is never initialized on the new carousel. This leaves the new carousel static and unresponsive to user interactions.

Solution:
---
- Before replacing the carousel DOM node, manually notify the public.interactions service to clean up any active interactions on the old element. After the new DOM node is queried, start the interactions on the new element.

opw-6229291
---
I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#265537

Steps to Reproduce
---
1. Open the Planning module
2. Create an open shift with allocated_hours
3. Click Auto Plan
4. Click Undo on the auto-plan notification

Issue
---
Undoing an auto-plan operation triggers recomputation of allocated_hours,
causing the shift to lose its original workload value.

Current Behaviour
---
When resource_id is set to False during undo:
- _compute_allocated_hours is triggered (depends on resource_id)
- _compute_allocated_percentage is triggered (depends on allocated_hours)
- Both fields are recalculated, potentially changing allocated_hours
  from its pre-assignment value

Expected Behaviour
---
Undoing auto-plan should preserve allocated_hours at its pre-assignment
value while allowing allocated_percentage to adapt to the new context
(open slot vs assigned resource).

Fix
---
Use protecting context manager in action_rollback_auto_plan_ids
to prevent allocated_hours from being recomputed when resource_id is
removed. This allows allocated_percentage to recalculate naturally based
on slot duration while keeping allocated_hours stable.

task - 4952149

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#119772
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#102864

Issue:
When the sales price is changed from the product variant form for a product without configured variants, the price is updated only on `product.product.lst_price`. The main product form, opened from Inventory > Products, displays `product.template.list_price`, which remains unchanged. The same issue is visible from Purchase Orders because the product internal link on a purchase order line opens `product.product`, while the product page opens `product.template`.

Steps to reproduce:
- Create or open a product without configured variants
- Open product variant form from the internal link in a purchase order
- Change the Sales Price on the product from there
- Open the product from Inventory > Products (`product.template`)
- The template Sales Price still shows the old value

Cause:
Since version 19.1, `product.product.lst_price` is an editable stored field, allowing variant-level prices to differ from the template price. This is correct for products with multiple variants, where each variant may have its own sales price. However, for products with only one variant (the product itself), no synchronization was performed from `product.product.lst_price` back to `product.template.list_price`, leaving both product forms inconsistent.

Solution:
- Add `_inverse_product_lst_price` on `product.product.lst_price` so that When `lst_price` is written and the template has exactly one variant, set `list_price` to `lst_price` (delegates to the template)

opw-6260015

---
I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr

Steps to reproduce:
- Create a storable product “P1” with Lot tracking
- Enable routes: MTO + Manufacture
- Create a BoM for the product:
    - Component: C1
- Configure the warehouse with 3-step manufacturing
- Have on-hand stock in WH/Stock with Lot 001
- Confirm a Sales Order for the product
- Confirm the generated Manufacturing Order and produce Lot 002
- In the "Store Finished Products" transfer, change the destination location from WH/Stock to WH/Stock/Shelf 1 and validate
- Check the Delivery Order reservation

Problem:
The move is reserved with Lot 001 instead of 002

When using a 3-step manufacturing flow (MTO + Manufacture), if the user manually changes the destination of the "Store Finished Products" transfer to a sublocation of WH/Stock (e.g. WH/Stock/Shelf 1), the MTO link between the production and the delivery order was incorrectly broken, causing the delivery to reserve existing stock instead of the freshly produced lot.

Root cause: `_skip_push()` only skipped push logic when the downstream move's source was a child-or-equal of the current move's destination (`m.location_id._child_of(self.location_dest_id)`). When the destination was changed to a sublocation (WH/Stock/Shelf 1), this check failed, so `_push_apply()` ran, found the delivery's source (WH/Stock) was not a child of WH/Stock/Shelf 1, and called `_break_mto_link()`, clearing `move_orig_ids` on the delivery move. The delivery then fell back to make-to-stock reservation and picked an unrelated lot.

opw-6197212

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#268783

### Issue
Since the introduction of the Tax Returns feature in 18.3, it was no longer possible to generate a Closing Entry as the button has been replaced by Returns
The Return mechanism implies that you need a Return Type in order to make a Closing Entry using the Validate button

Additionally, using the Generic Tax Report by default creates a risk in Multi-VAT environments, as it mixes taxes from all countries instead of isolating Peruvian taxes

### Cause
The new 18.3 accounting workflow requires at least one active Return Type associated with a country-specific report variant to display the Return options and process the closing entry Peru was relying on the Generic Tax Report, without a dedicated report variant
No Return Type was configured, which blocked Odoo's automatic VAT closing workflow and prevented the system from prompting the user to configure the required closing accounts

### Steps to reproduce
- Install `l10n_pe_reports` and `accountant`
- Switch to a PE Company
- Go to the Tax Report

Before the fix, no Returns button is available for any of the existing reports, making it impossible to use Odoo's automatic process to configure the tax accounts and trigger the closing entry

### Notes
This is fixed by creating a dedicated Peruvian tax report variant directly in Enterprise that inherits from the generic tax report A custom handler is added to force the domain filtering on Peruvian taxes only, and a corresponding Return Type is defined to restore the full closing entry process safely

opw-5978673

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#117891

Scenario:

- set up turnstile
- with recent safari mac os or ios (reproduced from 26.2) go to
  /web/login page in a private window
- enter login and password and pass the turnstile challenge
- click on Log in

Result: nothing happens and there is an error in the console "An invalid
form control with name='' is not focusable."

Cause:

By default Safari has the Settings > Advanced > "Use advanced tracking
and fingerprinting protection" set to "in Private Browsing".

If this options is enabled in private browser or in all browsing, you
can't login to Odoo with turnstile because safari is preventing the
update of the element that is preventing to send the form:

<input style="display: none;" class="turnstile_captcha_valid" required>

When turnstile challenge succeeds, a value should be set to this input
that will unlock the form, the .value property is updated but the
browser Shadow Content is not (and if we remove display:none, the input
is empty).

Fix:

I've not been able to reproduce the issue without turnstile using same
situation and iframe. We don't know Safari heuristic but the unlocking
is working if:

- we use setProperty instead of .value
- we unset required
- we remove the input
- we display the turnstile_captcha_valid input before challenge

This fix replaces setting .value by setProperty, and add a failsafe of
unsetting required.

opw-5917286
fixes #247536

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#253367

**Steps to reproduce:**
* Install `l10n_co_edi` module with DEMO DIAN mode enabled.
* Go to Accounting > Vendor > Bills and create a new bill.
* Select any Colombian partner different from `Consumidor Final`.
* Set the invoice date to 6 days in the past.
* Select the DIAN Support Documents journal and a product with UNSPSC category.
* Confirm the bill and click `Send Support Document to DIAN` after 5 PM Colombia time.

**Observed behavior:**
* An error is raised stating the issue date cannot be older than 6 days or more than 6 days in the future, even though the invoice date is within the allowed window in Colombia local time.

**Cause:**
* The date window validation in `_check_move_configuration` used `fields.Datetime.now()` which returns UTC time. Since Colombia is UTC-5, after 5 PM local time the UTC clock has already rolled over to the next calendar day, making a 6-day-old invoice appear 7 days old and failing the validation incorrectly.

**Fix:**
* Convert the current UTC datetime to the `America/Bogota` timezone and extract its local date before computing the allowed date window.
* Compare directly against `move.invoice_date` (a `date` field) instead of using `fields.Datetime.to_datetime()`, keeping the comparison consistent as `date` vs `date`.

opw-6011502

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#119794
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#115256

### Steps to reproduce:

- In the settings enable: "Units of Measure & Packagings", "Storage Locations"
- Create a product in units and register 1 unit in stock
- Inventory > Operations > Adjustments > Physical Inventory
- Select your line and request a count > Set Current Value
- Inventory > Configurations > units of measures > UOM categories
- Select unit and archive it
- Go to the barcode app > Click Count inventory
### > Owl error: Uncaught promise

### Cause of the issue:

Since the uom used on the quant is archived, it is not found by the search used to fill the barcodeCache:
https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/26546bcd3beebc7f65ce08385441b6284b46598e/stock_barcode/static/src/components/main.js#L209-L213 https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/26546bcd3beebc7f65ce08385441b6284b46598e/stock_barcode/models/stock_quant.py#L104-L106 https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/26546bcd3beebc7f65ce08385441b6284b46598e/stock_barcode/static/src/components/main.js#L229 https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/26546bcd3beebc7f65ce08385441b6284b46598e/stock_barcode/static/src/models/barcode_model.js#L37-L39 However, if the uom is not present in the barcode cache the `BarcodeQautnModel` will fail to createLinesState whihc raises a missing error:
https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/26546bcd3beebc7f65ce08385441b6284b46598e/stock_barcode/static/src/models/barcode_quant_model.js#L712 https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/26546bcd3beebc7f65ce08385441b6284b46598e/stock_barcode/static/src/lazy_barcode_cache.js#L107-L110

opw-6250090

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#118987
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#118813

Steps to Reproduce
---
1. Open the Planning module
2. Create an open shift with allocated_hours
3. Click Auto Plan
4. Click Undo on the auto-plan notification

Issue
---
Undoing an auto-plan operation triggers recomputation of allocated_hours,
causing the shift to lose its original workload value.

Current Behaviour
---
When resource_id is set to False during undo:
- _compute_allocated_hours is triggered (depends on resource_id)
- _compute_allocated_percentage is triggered (depends on allocated_hours)
- Both fields are recalculated, potentially changing allocated_hours
  from its pre-assignment value

Expected Behaviour
---
Undoing auto-plan should preserve allocated_hours at its pre-assignment
value while allowing allocated_percentage to adapt to the new context
(open slot vs assigned resource).

Fix
---
Use protecting context manager in action_rollback_auto_plan_ids
to prevent allocated_hours from being recomputed when resource_id is
removed. This allows allocated_percentage to recalculate naturally based
on slot duration while keeping allocated_hours stable.

task - 4952149

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#119772
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#102864

Steps to produce:
---
- Install `sale_subscription` module.
- Enable `pricelists` from Settings.
- Create a new subscription product.
- Create a new pricelist and Under Recurring Prices, add below rules for
  the monthly recurring plan on creatred subscription product:
      - Min Qty = 0 then Price = 0.
      - Min Qty = 10 then Price = 10.
      - Min Qty = 20 then price = 20.
 (This setup ensures the product is free when the quantity is less than 10, and
 pricing increases based on the defined quantity tiers.)
- Create a sale order > Set a customer > Select the recurring plan as `Monthly` > Apply the created pricelist.
- Add the subscription product with quantity = 20 then Unit price is correctly set to 20.
- Change the quantity to 1.

Observation:
---
- The unit price does not update to 0 as expected.

Root cause:
---
- At [1], when quantity is updated to 1, `super()._get_pricelist_price()` correctly returns `0`.
- However, due to the `or self.price_unit` condition, the existing unit price is retained instead of applying the new value.
- This prevents valid pricelist rules (including zero-priced ones) from being applied.

Fix:
---
- As shown in [2], `line.pricelist_item_id` is set when a matching pricelist rule is found. Therefore, when a rule (including one for quantity = 0) applies, it will be reflected in `line.pricelist_item_id`.
- If `pricelist_item_id` is set, the computed price from the rule must be used; otherwise, fall back to the existing unit price.

[1]: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/7498010b8206df56fc5d8a9fd08b24169bf08cb2/sale_subscription/models/sale_order_line.py#L651-L654
[2]: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/fab39bbea642c1a185e6cb91afea860fa0c0f27d/addons/sale/models/sale_order_line.py#L547-L557

opw-6122234
---

### Issue
Since the introduction of the Tax Returns feature in 18.3, it was no longer possible to generate a Closing Entry as the button has been replaced by Returns
The Return mechanism implies that you need a Return Type in order to make a Closing Entry using the Validate button

Additionally, using the Generic Tax Report by default creates a risk in Multi-VAT environments, as it mixes taxes from all countries instead of isolating Peruvian taxes

### Cause
The new 18.3 accounting workflow requires at least one active Return Type associated with a country-specific report variant to display the Return options and process the closing entry Peru was relying on the Generic Tax Report, without a dedicated report variant
No Return Type was configured, which blocked Odoo's automatic VAT closing workflow and prevented the system from prompting the user to configure the required closing accounts

### Steps to reproduce
- Install `l10n_pe_reports` and `accountant`
- Switch to a PE Company
- Go to the Tax Report

Before the fix, no Returns button is available for any of the existing reports, making it impossible to use Odoo's automatic process to configure the tax accounts and trigger the closing entry

### Notes
This is fixed by creating a dedicated Peruvian tax report variant directly in Enterprise that inherits from the generic tax report A custom handler is added to force the domain filtering on Peruvian taxes only, and a corresponding Return Type is defined to restore the full closing entry process safely

opw-5978673

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#117891

**Steps to reproduce:**
* Install `l10n_co_edi` module with DEMO DIAN mode enabled.
* Go to Accounting > Vendor > Bills and create a new bill.
* Select any Colombian partner different from `Consumidor Final`.
* Set the invoice date to 6 days in the past.
* Select the DIAN Support Documents journal and a product with UNSPSC category.
* Confirm the bill and click `Send Support Document to DIAN` after 5 PM Colombia time.

**Observed behavior:**
* An error is raised stating the issue date cannot be older than 6 days or more than 6 days in the future, even though the invoice date is within the allowed window in Colombia local time.

**Cause:**
* The date window validation in `_check_move_configuration` used `fields.Datetime.now()` which returns UTC time. Since Colombia is UTC-5, after 5 PM local time the UTC clock has already rolled over to the next calendar day, making a 6-day-old invoice appear 7 days old and failing the validation incorrectly.

**Fix:**
* Convert the current UTC datetime to the `America/Bogota` timezone and extract its local date before computing the allowed date window.
* Compare directly against `move.invoice_date` (a `date` field) instead of using `fields.Datetime.to_datetime()`, keeping the comparison consistent as `date` vs `date`.

opw-6011502

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#119794
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#115256

#### Description of the issue/feature this PR addresses:
Opening the Asset Depreciation Schedule report with a period comparison enabled crashes with KeyError: 'no_format' when prefix grouping is active (large number of assets in one account group). The report becomes unusable for affected customers.

#### Current behavior before PR:
_regroup_lines_by_name_prefix sums each subline column by indexing prefix_subline['columns'][i]['no_format'] directly. Empty columns are built as {} by _build_column_dict (both col_value and col_data are None), so they have no 'no_format' key. With a comparison period enabled, an asset that has no value in the comparison period produces an empty column for that period; once prefix grouping fires (len(lines) >= prefix_groups_threshold, default 4000), the direct lookup hits that empty dict and raises KeyError: 'no_format'.

#### Desired behavior after PR is merged:
The prefix group total treats a missing 'no_format' as 0, matching the sibling caller in account_asset/models/account_assets_report.py that already guards with .get('no_format', 0). The report builds without crashing and the empty comparison column contributes 0 to the prefix group total.

opw-6225639

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#119088

Steps to reproduce
---
1. Register a grouped customer payment over several invoices, leaving one of them only partially paid.
2. Register a second grouped payment over two invoices: the partially paid one and a brand new invoice.
3. Open the first payment, its "Reconciled Invoices" smart button now lists the new invoice from the second payment, which it never paid.

Issue
---
The smart button is built from the stored `invoice_ids` many2many, which shares its relation table with `account.move.matched_payment_ids`. After reconciling, the register wizard links the payment to its invoices with `lines.move_id.matched_payment_ids += payment` at https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/f726393267a28cedd5febd2106de17ae3838f3ff/addons/account/wizard/account_payment_register.py#L1212.

When the payment groups several invoices, `lines.move_id` is a multi-record recordset. Reading `matched_payment_ids` on it returns the union of the payments already linked to all those invoices, and `+=` writes that union back to every invoice as a `(6, 0, ...)` replace command. So an invoice already paid by an earlier payment spreads that earlier payment onto every other invoice grouped in the new one, including brand new invoices, which then wrongly appear on the earlier payment.

opw-6188013
---
I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#267968

Version:
----------
- 18.0+


Steps to reproduce:
-------------------
1. Install *quality_control* module.
2. Go to *Settings* and enable *Storage Locations*.
3. Open Quality module go to the Quality control -> Quality points 
4. Create a *Quality Point* with:
  * *Product* set.
  * *Control per* set to *Quantity*.
  * *Operation* set to *Receipts*.
  * *Failure Location* set to *WH/Stock/Shelf1*.
5. Create a *Receipt* with demand of *2 units* for the product used in QP.
6. Mark the quality check as *To Do*.
7. Update the *Done Quantity* to *1*.
8. Open the quality check and click *Fail*.
9. Update the *Done Quantity* back to *2* and save.
10. Open the quality check again, click *Pass*, and validate the receipt.
11. Open the *Detailed Operations* to inspect move lines.

Issue:
------
* Both units (failed and passed) are moved to the *failure location*.

Cause:
------
When a user fails a move line via the QC wizard, the flow is:
  do_fail() → show_failure_message() → confirm_fail()
    → check._move_to_failure_location(failure_location_id, failed_qty)

Inside `_move_to_failure_location`, when `failed_qty == move_line.quantity`,
the condition:
 https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/a33f580455a54a81d89a848f7b493d9dcc9ba2b2/quality_control/models/quality.py#L458
e.g. 1 == 1

was True even when `move.product_uom_qty = 2` (demand still 2). It only
compared the done quantities, ignoring that unfulfilled demand remained.
As a result, `move.location_dest_id` was set to the failure location.

Later, when the user increases the quantity from 1 to 2 on the move form,
the flow is:
_set_quantity → process_increase → _set_quantity_done → _prepare_move_line_vals
In `_prepare_move_line_vals` :
    'location_dest_id': self.location_dest_id.id,

https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/47bf284e1e9d8be0d4255418e0a3f67c74fa5114/addons/stock/models/stock_move.py#L1688

The new move line inherits `move.location_dest_id` directly, which at this
point is already the failure location. 

When the user then calls `do_pass()` on the second unit, `do_pass()` only
writes `quality_state = 'pass'` and never touches `location_dest_id`. So
the second (passed) move line silently retains the failure location.

Solution:
---------
Add the guard `move.product_uom_qty <= move_line.quantity` to the condition
so the entire move's destination is only redirected when there is genuinely
no remaining unfulfilled demand:

When demand > done qty, the else-branch runs instead: it reduces the
original move's demand and creates a new separate move pointing to the
failure location, leaving the original move's `location_dest_id` pointing
to stock. Any subsequent move lines created on the original move therefore
correctly inherit the stock destination.

---

opw-6080871

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#112859

#### Description of the issue/feature this PR addresses:
Opening the Asset Depreciation Schedule report with a period comparison enabled crashes with KeyError: 'no_format' when prefix grouping is active (large number of assets in one account group). The report becomes unusable for affected customers.

#### Current behavior before PR:
_regroup_lines_by_name_prefix sums each subline column by indexing prefix_subline['columns'][i]['no_format'] directly. Empty columns are built as {} by _build_column_dict (both col_value and col_data are None), so they have no 'no_format' key. With a comparison period enabled, an asset that has no value in the comparison period produces an empty column for that period; once prefix grouping fires (len(lines) >= prefix_groups_threshold, default 4000), the direct lookup hits that empty dict and raises KeyError: 'no_format'.

#### Desired behavior after PR is merged:
The prefix group total treats a missing 'no_format' as 0, matching the sibling caller in account_asset/models/account_assets_report.py that already guards with .get('no_format', 0). The report builds without crashing and the empty comparison column contributes 0 to the prefix group total.

opw-6225639

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#119088

*=l10n_ch_hr_payroll,hr_payroll_account_iso20022

When clicking the create payment report button on a payslip for a Swiss company,
a traceback occurs if the ``hr_payroll_account_iso20022`` module is not installed.

Steps to reproduce the error:
- Install ``l10n_ch_hr_payroll`` module
- Switch to CH Company
- Create an Employee and running contract for it
- Go to Payroll > Payslip > All payslips > Create a new payslip > Set the employee > Confirm > Create payment report

Traceback:
```py
ValueError: Wrong value for hr.payroll.payment.report.wizard.export_format: 'iso20022_ch'
```

https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/7792926504a823590fbbe574a96994002a92fc17/l10n_ch_hr_payroll/models/hr_payslip.py#L383 https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/7792926504a823590fbbe574a96994002a92fc17/l10n_ch_hr_payroll/models/hr_payslip_run.py#L13
Here, ``iso20022_ch`` is passed as ``export_format``,
However, ``iso20022_ch`` is added to the selection field in the ``hr_payroll_account_iso20022`` module at [1].
When that module is not installed, the selection value does not exist, leading to the above error.

[1]: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/7792926504a823590fbbe574a96994002a92fc17/hr_payroll_account_iso20022/wizard/hr_payroll_payment_report_wizard.py#L11

sentry-7391832811

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#113277

The display name of the account.report.line in the general ledger report has the format of:

INVOICE NAME (invoice refs)

In the case where a client has hundreds of sales orders batched to a single invoice, the ref can
become extremely long, e.g.:

INV/2026/00001 (S12123, S12152, S12159, S12140, S12165, S12161, S12162, S12110, S12099, S12124, S12145, S12128, S12114, S12131, S12097, S12185, S12154, S12133, S12190, S12118, S12116, S12102, S12155, S12153, S12158, S12150, S12100, S12142, S12121, S12122, S12111, S12187, S12172, S12177, S12095, S12117, S12144, S12137, S12092, S12138, S12186, S12182, S12112, S12148, S12183, S12101, S12178, S12119, S12169, S12115, S12146, S12093, S12126, S12160, S12163, S12129, S12098, S12151, S12096, S12174, S12120, S12130, S12147, S12180, S12191, S12164, S12141, S12105, S12136, S12139, S12109, S12106, S12104, S12103, S12175, S12179, S12188, S12113, S12173, S12167, S12171, S12134, S12094, S12184, S12166, S12170, S12125, S12135, S12143, S12176, S12189, S12156, S12181, S12107, S12157, S12132, S12149, S12127, S12108, S12168...)

Because the length of the account.report.line is unchecked in account_general_ledger.py label
builder, the pdf can clog to one or two account.report.lines per page, skyrocketing the pdf page length.

As wkhtmltopdf processes the report from html to pdf it makes a system call openat() to the /tmp/report.footer.tmp.x.html file for EACH page of the pdf. You can see the TODO comment in the spoolTo function in wkhtmltopdf (both in Odoo and the original repo) saying that the header and footer need to be freed, on each page processing, not just null pointed.

https://github.com/odoo/wkhtmltopdf/blob/2c884bd1545b8a639847de22f24754ee5a6fc44c/src/lib/pdfconverter.cc#L794

I verified that that the number of openat calls to the /tmp/report.footer.tmp.x.html file equals the exact number of pages in the pdf to be generated if the report HAD generated successfully by setting the footer input into
_run_wkhtmltopdf to None, generating the report without footers, then separately running an strace on wkhtmltopdf when the report fails to generate. See related ticket linked at bottom.

The linux machine used on sh instances has a ulimit -n of 1024 file descriptors. Because
the footer file descriptors accumulate, once a pdf has about 1010+ pages (~a dozen fd's are allocated for other purposes), over 1024 file descriptors are opened and the system fails with:

Wkhtmltopdf failed (error code: -6). Message:
QEventDispatcherUNIXPrivate(): Unable to create
thread pipe: Too many open files
QEventDispatcherUNIXPrivate(): Can not continue
without a thread pipe

Since wkhtmltopdf is archived and Odoo has a replacement in development, I suggest that we limit the display_name of the account.report.line to 200 to keep the bloat minimized, preventing one account.report.line's name from taking up an entire page of the general ledger pdf. This allows many more batched invoices to be shown in the report and a much greater time range of data to be printed without hitting the fd limit.

I suggest changing it at the general ledger report level rather than in the account.move.line
_compute_display_name function, as we probably still want to see the full display_names at the invoice level.

On runbot, the machine has different memory constraints than on sh / local, so it hits the following error before the one above:

Wkhtmltopdf failed (error code: -11). Memory limit too low or maximum file number of subprocess
reached. Message :

Steps to Reproduce on 19.0 newdb:

1. newdb -n test_gl -v 19.0
2. ensure ulimit is set to 1024 in shell that runs odoo instance by running ulimit -n 1024 to
mimic ulimit of sh environment
3. run db with python3 odoo-bin, ensuring high enough memory constraints to simulate multi
worker sh instance, i.e.
--limit-memory-soft=12884901888
--limit-memory-hard=1288490188
4. install sales, accounting, stock
5. install demo data
6. create invoices with 100+ associated sales orders
7. generate the pdf
8. Increase the amount of invoices till the general ledger page count hits ~1010+, where you will
hit the error.

Notes:
opw-ticket-6201508

closes #118067

### Steps to reproduce:

1. Create a product tracked by lot
2. Put 10 units in WH/Stock without lot
3. Inventory > Operations > Adjustments > Physical Inventory
4. Select the line referring to your product and request an inventory count + Show Expected Quantity
5. Open the barcode app > Count Inventory
6. Scan your product
#### > The line is not selected, in particular, next scans will be re-interpreted as product scans rather than new serial creation for your product.

### Cause of the issue:

Scanning your product search a line to select if any: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/bce04ce24b66fb1a2481274eb3aebdc30a62766e/stock_barcode/static/src/models/barcode_model.js#L1432-L1435 https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/bce04ce24b66fb1a2481274eb3aebdc30a62766e/stock_barcode/static/src/models/barcode_model.js#L1630-L1632
However, the `findLine` will fail since this method calls the `_canOverrideTrackingNumber` to determine if the lot of the barcodData matches the one of the line:
https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/bce04ce24b66fb1a2481274eb3aebdc30a62766e/stock_barcode/static/src/models/barcode_model.js#L1859-L1863
But, the override of the `_canOverrideTrackingNumber` method for the `BarcodeQuantModel` does not handle the absence of lotName in the barcodeData correctly as it does not consider that a line without lot can be overridden by an empty lotName:
https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/bce04ce24b66fb1a2481274eb3aebdc30a62766e/stock_barcode/static/src/models/barcode_quant_model.js#L729-L731
Note however that the super call does:
https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/bce04ce24b66fb1a2481274eb3aebdc30a62766e/stock_barcode/static/src/models/barcode_model.js#L795-L798

### Issue 2:

### Steps to reproduce:

- Steps 1 -> 5
- Click on your product line to select it
- Scan a new lot to add one new unit referring to that lot
- Confirm (1)
- Apply Now
#### > User Error: Quant's editing is restricted, you can't do this operation

Since the line is selected, you have a currentLine during the `processBarcode` and hence the existing line will be updated using the `lotName``:
https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/cf3c2fce8a6b7b2d7547d44a0e4423f887986d52/stock_barcode/static/src/models/barcode_model.js#L1560-L1584 However, writing on the line will then try to write on the related quant during the validation process which will be forbiden since we are not allowed to change the lot of an existing quant:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/e3b0ca11d99b2ef819cdad68b169112cd73668b6/addons/stock/models/stock_quant.py#L351-L360 Now, the issue is that actually due to the nature of the line and of the barcode data, the line lot is not expected to be updated but rather a new line is expected to be created:
https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/cf3c2fce8a6b7b2d7547d44a0e4423f887986d52/stock_barcode/static/src/models/barcode_model.js#L795-L798

Additional issue:

Fixing issue 1 and 2 highlight and other issue of the validation process:

- Steps 1 -> 6
> The line gets selected
- Scan a newlot
> a new subline is added referring to 1 unit of your new quant
- Confirm (1) > Some serials where not counted, set them as missing
#### > Check your quants: the 10 unit lotless quant was not updated but a new quant for 1 units was created for your newlot

### Cause of the issue:

Applying all quantities is expecting to toggle them as counted before applying to update the existing quants:
https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/c8535a7a0e2eae811048a34a0bae187a1fa45311/stock_barcode/static/src/models/barcode_quant_model.js#L72-L82 https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/c8535a7a0e2eae811048a34a0bae187a1fa45311/stock_barcode/static/src/models/barcode_quant_model.js#L287-L296 However, only line tracked by serial numbers are set as counted: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/c8535a7a0e2eae811048a34a0bae187a1fa45311/stock_barcode/static/src/models/barcode_quant_model.js#L60-L63

opw-6212923

### Issue before this commit:
In accrual reports (e.g., "Bill To Receive", "Billed Not Received", "Invoices To Be Issued", and "Invoices Not Delivered"), when grouping the list view by fields such as Vendor, the group header totals for the "Received", "Billed", and "Amount" columns display 0.00 even if the interanl lines of the group are not 0.00.

### Steps to reproduce the issue:
1. Download Purchase Accounting and Sale Accounting
2. Go to one of this pages: Billed Not Received, Bill To Receive, Invoices To Be Issued, and Invoices Not Delivered
3. Ensure the view is in its default grouping (grouped by Vendor or Customer)
4. Observe the group header rows for the Received (or Delivered), Billed (or Invoiced), and Amount columns. They all display 0.00
5. Expand a group that contains records with values greater than zero
6. Observe that the individual records populate correctly, but the aggregated group header row continues to display 0.00.

### Cause of the issue:
The commit ddc1b681656ea8c70f3231cda20b5a58b9ff7dd6 adapted the code to retrieve the new accrual reports but attempted to fetch grouped records using group[0].id as the dictionary key, while the grouped() method actually used the recordset object as the key. This mismatch caused the dictionary lookup to fail, resulting in 0.00 sums. https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/c8535a7a0e2eae811048a34a0bae187a1fa45311/account_accountant/models/analytic_mixin.py#L40-L48

### Reason to introduce the fix:
This fix restores the core analytical utility of the accrual reports, which are crucial for accountants during period-end closings to evaluate totals at a glance.

opw-6232273

Steps to Reproduce
---
1. Open the Planning module
2. Create an open shift with allocated_hours
3. Click Auto Plan
4. Click Undo on the auto-plan notification

Issue
---
Undoing an auto-plan operation triggers recomputation of allocated_hours,
causing the shift to lose its original workload value.

Current Behaviour
---
When resource_id is set to False during undo:
- _compute_allocated_hours is triggered (depends on resource_id)
- _compute_allocated_percentage is triggered (depends on allocated_hours)
- Both fields are recalculated, potentially changing allocated_hours
  from its pre-assignment value

Expected Behaviour
---
Undoing auto-plan should preserve allocated_hours at its pre-assignment
value while allowing allocated_percentage to adapt to the new context
(open slot vs assigned resource).

Fix
---
Use protecting context manager in action_rollback_auto_plan_ids
to prevent allocated_hours from being recomputed when resource_id is
removed. This allows allocated_percentage to recalculate naturally based
on slot duration while keeping allocated_hours stable.

task - 4952149

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#119772
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#102864

### Issue
Since the introduction of the Tax Returns feature in 18.3, it was no longer possible to generate a Closing Entry as the button has been replaced by Returns
The Return mechanism implies that you need a Return Type in order to make a Closing Entry using the Validate button

Additionally, using the Generic Tax Report by default creates a risk in Multi-VAT environments, as it mixes taxes from all countries instead of isolating Peruvian taxes

### Cause
The new 18.3 accounting workflow requires at least one active Return Type associated with a country-specific report variant to display the Return options and process the closing entry Peru was relying on the Generic Tax Report, without a dedicated report variant
No Return Type was configured, which blocked Odoo's automatic VAT closing workflow and prevented the system from prompting the user to configure the required closing accounts

### Steps to reproduce
- Install `l10n_pe_reports` and `accountant`
- Switch to a PE Company
- Go to the Tax Report

Before the fix, no Returns button is available for any of the existing reports, making it impossible to use Odoo's automatic process to configure the tax accounts and trigger the closing entry

### Notes
This is fixed by creating a dedicated Peruvian tax report variant directly in Enterprise that inherits from the generic tax report A custom handler is added to force the domain filtering on Peruvian taxes only, and a corresponding Return Type is defined to restore the full closing entry process safely

opw-5978673

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#117891

### Steps to reproduce:

- In the settings enable: "Units of Measure & Packagings", "Storage Locations"
- Create a product in units and register 1 unit in stock
- Inventory > Operations > Adjustments > Physical Inventory
- Select your line and request a count > Set Current Value
- Inventory > Configurations > units of measures > UOM categories
- Select unit and archive it
- Go to the barcode app > Click Count inventory
### > Owl error: Uncaught promise

### Cause of the issue:

Since the uom used on the quant is archived, it is not found by the search used to fill the barcodeCache:
https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/26546bcd3beebc7f65ce08385441b6284b46598e/stock_barcode/static/src/components/main.js#L209-L213 https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/26546bcd3beebc7f65ce08385441b6284b46598e/stock_barcode/models/stock_quant.py#L104-L106 https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/26546bcd3beebc7f65ce08385441b6284b46598e/stock_barcode/static/src/components/main.js#L229 https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/26546bcd3beebc7f65ce08385441b6284b46598e/stock_barcode/static/src/models/barcode_model.js#L37-L39 However, if the uom is not present in the barcode cache the `BarcodeQautnModel` will fail to createLinesState whihc raises a missing error:
https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/26546bcd3beebc7f65ce08385441b6284b46598e/stock_barcode/static/src/models/barcode_quant_model.js#L712 https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/26546bcd3beebc7f65ce08385441b6284b46598e/stock_barcode/static/src/lazy_barcode_cache.js#L107-L110

opw-6250090

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#118987
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#118813

Currently when user adds adds quantity in barcode using lots it leads to incorrect sale order quantities.

## Steps to replicate:
- Install Sales and Barcode (no demo data).
- Enable Lots & Serial Numbers in settings.
- Create Test Product with Tracking by Lots.
- Go to Inventory > Products>Lots & Serial Numbers and create 3 lots for the product.
- Update each lot’s on-hand quantity to 10 from the product page.
- Create and confirm a Sales Order for the product (lines: qty 3 and 2 units).
- Open the delivery in the Barcode app:
   - Scan lot 2 > increase qty to 3 using +1 button
   - Scan lot 3 > increase qty to 2 using +1 button
- Validate and go to the sale order.

## Observed Behavior:
The sale order delivered quantities are flipped and a backorder is created even though the quantity for the product is satisfied.

## Root cause:
The issue occurs because when a sales order is confirmed, the system defaults to
 using lot 1 on the delivery receipt. When a user scans lot 2, the `_processBarcode` function is triggered, which calls `_findLine` at [1] to select the appropriate line on the receipt.

As the loop in `_findLine` iterates through `pageLines` with values like: 
```
[{display_name: "Test product", quantity: 3, lot_id: { name: 'lot1' }}, 
{display_name: "Test product", quantity: 2, lot_id: { name: 'lot1' }}]
```

During the first iteration, `foundLine` is set at [2] for the line with quantity 3 . Since the subsequent if condition is not satisfied, the loop hits the continue block at [3].
On the next iteration, the line with quantity 2 causes `foundLine` to be overwritten at [2], and the continue block is executed again at [3].

This results in the line with quantity 2 being selected as the line to update at the end of the function.

When the user manually increases the quantity to 3, the line that originally required quantity 2 is updated and fulfilled.
Later, when lot 3 is scanned, the line that required quantity 3 is selected for update, and manually increasing the quantity to 2 before validating the order leads to a backorder and causes the delivered quantities to be flipped.

[1]:
https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/81eaeb4b18d849c644160234def6c69013591abe/stock_barcode/static/src/models/barcode_model.js#L1335-L1337 [2]:
https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/81eaeb4b18d849c644160234def6c69013591abe/stock_barcode/static/src/models/barcode_model.js#L1690-L1699 [3]:
https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/81eaeb4b18d849c644160234def6c69013591abe/stock_barcode/static/src/models/barcode_model.js#L1727-L1729

## Solution:
Avoid grouping lines from different moves unless using batch transfers. This ensures that backorders are not created when the barcode lines are fulfilled.

opw-5423943

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#118085
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#109032

Steps to produce:
---
- Install sale_management and website_sale modules with demo data.
- From settings, disable the PDF Quote Builder.
- Go to Settings > Technical > Sequences & Identifiers > External Identifiers.
- Delete the `consu_delivery_02_product_template` identifier.
- From settings, try to enable the PDF Quote Builder again.

Issue:
---
```py
insert or update on table "quotation_document_sale_pdf_form_field_rel" violates foreign key constraint
"quotation_document_sale_pdf_form_fie_quotation_document_id_fkey"
DETAIL: Key (quotation_document_id)=(1) is not present in table "quotation_document".
```


Cause:
---
When the XML demo loader processes **`sale_pdf_quote_builder_demo.xml`**, it calls `create()` on `quotation.document` for each of the 5 demo records one by one. Each create() call receives vals_list that contains datas, the actual PDF base64 content.

Inside `super().create(vals_list) `[1], the ORM writes datas to `ir_attachment`. Since `form_field_ids` is a `store=True` computed field with `@api.depends('datas')` [2], the ORM knows it needs to recompute `form_field_ids`. But it does not run the computation immediately. It simply registers the records in a pending recompute set and moves on. Nothing hits the DB yet for this compute.

After `super().create() `returns, the `write({'res_model': ..., 'res_id': ...})` runs. Since `res_model` and `res_id` live on `ir_attachment` (the parent table via _inherits), this write is also not immediately flushed to the DB. The ORM marks it as dirty in the cache and defers it.

So after all 5 records are created, the ORM holds two deferred things: a dirty UPDATE ir_attachment write for all 5 records, and a pending recompute for `form_field_ids` on all 5 records. Nothing has been flushed to the DB yet.

When the demo XML tries to reference `product.consu_delivery_02_product_template` [3], which no longer exists,
a ValueError is raised. From `load_demo()` [4], the savepoint is rolled back.

After the except block logs the failure, execution continues in l`oad_module_graph()` which calls `env.cr.commit()`. This triggers f`lush() -> transaction.flush() -> flush_all() -> _recompute_all()`. The ORM processes the pending recompute registry and finds `form_field_ids` needs recomputing for quotation.document(1, 2, 3, 4, 5). It calls `_compute_form_field_ids`() on those stale ids. Inside that compute, `_create_or_update_form_fields_on_pdf_records()` tries to insert into `quotation_document_sale_pdf_form_field_rel` with quotation_document_id=1. But quotation_document id 1 no longer exists in the DB — it was rolled back — so PostgreSQL raises the foreign key violation.

This is confirmed by the traceback from `_compute_form_field_ids`, which shows the call chain going through `commit() -> flush_all() -> _recompute_all()` rather than through `create()`, proving the compute fired after the rollback using stale ORM cache state.

Fix:
---
Calling `docs.flush_recordset()` at the end of `create()` forces all pending writes and pending recomputes to be executed immediately, while still inside the savepoint scope:

- It flushes the dirty res_model/res_id write on the ir_attachment parent table, so UPDATE ir_attachment hits the DB inside the savepoint.
- It triggers `_recompute_all()` for the pending `form_field_ids` compute on docs, so `_compute_form_field_ids()` runs inside the savepoint and the INSERT into `quotation_document_sale_pdf_form_field_rel` happens while the quotation_document rows still exist in the DB.

If the savepoint then rolls back, the ORM cache has nothing dirty or pending left. The subsequent commit() in `load_module_graph()` finds nothing to flush, so no stale writes execute against non-existent ids and no foreign key violation occurs.

[1]https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/8791cdcd89ea3cb56b1fac63b3e2ffbd2956a912/addons/sale_pdf_quote_builder/models/quotation_document.py#L93-L98
[2]https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/8791cdcd89ea3cb56b1fac63b3e2ffbd2956a912/addons/sale_pdf_quote_builder/models/quotation_document.py#L62-L71
[3]https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/8791cdcd89ea3cb56b1fac63b3e2ffbd2956a912/addons/sale_pdf_quote_builder/data/sale_pdf_quote_builder_demo.xml#L44-L51
[4]https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/8791cdcd89ea3cb56b1fac63b3e2ffbd2956a912/odoo/modules/loading.py#L89-L90

opw-6139555
---
I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr