Currently, the system restricts fiscal document types for both sales and 
purchases based on the company’s VAT affiliation, which prevents 
valid vendor bills from being recorded.

**Steps to reproduce:**
- Install the `l10n_gt_edi` module and switch to a `GT company`.
- Navigate to Accounting > Vendors > Bills.
- Create a vendor bill.
- Try to select a document type such as `FPEQ` or `FCAP`.

**Observation:**
The system hides valid vendor document types (e.g., `FPEQ`, `FCAP`) 
if they do not match the company’s VAT affiliation.

**Root Cause:**
At [1], the method `_compute_l10n_gt_edi_available_doc_types` 
filters document types using the company’s VAT affiliation 
(`l10n_gt_edi_vat_affiliation`) for all move types.

This logic is correct for sales (where the company is the issuer), 
but incorrect for purchases (where the vendor determines the document 
type). As a result, valid purchase document types are wrongly excluded.

**Fix:**
This commit updates the computation logic to:
- Apply affiliation-based filtering only for sales (`out_*`).
- Bypass the restriction for purchases (`in_*`), allowing all valid document types.

This ensures that vendor bills can include any legally valid document 
type regardless of the company’s affiliation, while preserving the 
existing restrictions for sales workflows.

[1]:
https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/7792926504a823590fbbe574a96994002a92fc17/l10n_gt_edi/models/account_move.py#L162-L166

opw-6099863

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#113133

When reloading a chart of accounts, `_pre_reload_data` resolves an account via its xmlid and then evaluates:
```py
    re.match(f'^{values["code"]}0*$', account.code)
```
`account.code` is a non-stored computed field that reads from the company-dependent field `code_store`. If the resolved account has no `code_store` entry for the target company (e.g. the account was originally set up under a different company but its xmlid was prefixed with the current company id), `_compute_code` returns False instead of a string, causing a TypeError in re.match.
```py
  File "/home/odoo/src/odoo/19.0/addons/account/models/chart_template.py", line 442, in _pre_reload_data
    if not account or not re.match(f'^{values["code"]}0*$', account.code):
  File "/usr/lib/python3.10/re.py", line 190, in match
    return _compile(pattern, flags).match(string)
TypeError: expected string or bytes-like object
```
```sql
apan_4342860=> SELECT
    aa.id,
    aa.code_store,
    imd.module,
    imd.name
FROM account_account aa
JOIN ir_model_data imd
    ON imd.res_id = aa.id
   AND imd.model = 'account.account'
WHERE aa.id = 1056;
  id  |   code_store    | module  |      name
------+-----------------+---------+-----------------
 1056 | {"2": "510500"} | account | 1_co_puc_510500
(1 row)
```

This situation arises when a customer moves or reassigns an account between companies but the xmlid retains the original company prefix.

**Fix:**
After resolving the account via xmlid, check whether it actually belongs to the target company using filtered_domain with _check_company_domain. If it does not pass the check, unlink the stale ir.model.data entry and treat the account as not found, allowing the reload to re-establish the correct xmlid linkage via the code-based lookup that follows.

---
I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#269291

The media list snippet forces the image to fill the height of its row. The
image column carries align-self-stretch and the image carries h-100, so when
the text next to the image is longer than the image is tall, the row grows to
fit the text and the image is stretched to that height (and cropped through
object-fit: cover). The longer the text, the more the image is distorted.

Drop h-100 from the image and align-self-stretch from its column in the
s_media_list snippet and in the mass_mailing_themes templates that reuse it.
With no forced height the image keeps its natural aspect ratio and the row
height follows its content, so the image is laid out next to the text instead
of being stretched to match it.

Steps to reproduce:
1. Open Email Marketing and create a new mailing.
2. Select the Blogging template for the mail body.
3. In a media item, replace the text next to an image with a very long paragraph.

=> The image is stretched and cropped to match the height of the text.

Ticket [link](https://www.odoo.com/odoo/project.task/5117571)
opw-5117571

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#238138

Steps to reproduce
1. With a Mexican POS configured, create a POS order and sign a Global Invoice for it.
2. Open a new session and partially return the order; close the session.
3. On the original order, cancel the Global Invoice through the CFDI page.
4. Try to create a new Global Invoice for the original order.

Issue
The wizard raises "Orders <REFUND-NAME> are already sent or not eligible for CFDI."

Validating the refund auto-signs an `invoice_sent` CFDI on the refund pos.order because its parent is `global_sent`, see `_l10n_mx_edi_check_autogenerate_cfdi_refund` at https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/5af8048f0b0956a024d7eaeb10600eec74bdf3ee/l10n_mx_edi_pos/models/pos_order.py#L98. Cancelling the GI only flips its own document to `ginvoice_cancel`; the refund's `invoice_sent` doc stays untouched, so the refund's computed `l10n_mx_edi_cfdi_state` stays `'sent'`. The chain check in `_l10n_mx_edi_check_orders_for_global_invoice` at https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/5af8048f0b0956a024d7eaeb10600eec74bdf3ee/l10n_mx_edi_pos/models/pos_order.py#L184 then rejects the refund as already sent and the new GI cannot be created.

opw-6181136

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#120100
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#117211

When importing a Peppol/UBL vendor bill containing a line with a 100% discount, the line was created in Odoo with quantity=1 and discount of 100*original_qty, instead of the
expected quantity=qty_original and discount=100%.

This happened because the line-level branching in
`_import_ubl_invoice_line_add_price_unit_quantity_discount` relied on the truthiness of `line_extension_amount` to detect whether the `LineExtensionAmount` node was present in the XML. a line with a genuine `<cbc:LineExtensionAmount>0</...>` was indistinguishable from a line where the node was missing, and fell
through to the fallback branch intended for incomplete XML. That fallback reconstructs the quantity from `<cbc:BaseQuantity>`, ignoring `<cbc:InvoicedQuantity>`, and then computes the discount percentage against the wrong denominator.

a `LineExtensionAmount` of 0 is the only legal way to express a fully discounted line, so this case must be distinguished from the node being absent.

the fix is simply checking if the line exist not if its True

opw-6176349

---
I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#265261

### Note:
**THIS IS A BACKPORT OF** https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/pull/107556
Some edits were made to the tests so that they match Odoo v18.0

### Steps to reproduce:
- Create a new marketing campaign with two activities
- Set them to occur some number of days after the beginning
- Save the campaign and start it
- Modify one of the activities to occur some number of days after the other activity and save
- Modify the child activity by changing the number of days after its parent that it should run and save
> IndexError: tuple index out of range

### Issue:
The trace related to the child activity has no parent when trying to reschedule it in `_update_schedule_date`. This causes an issue when trying to get the first mailing_trace_ids using index 0 in this line:
https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/3e788e28dc76c928935d874e4e5a18d467c65539/marketing_automation/models/marketing_trace.py#L149

### Fix:
Prevent the activity hierarchy to be modified on started campaigns. We also change the indexing to avoid further out of range issue and properly default on the participant create value.

Trying to match existing traces to their parents has too many edge cases when trying to avoid duplicates, and might often need to reset the whole trace chain to work properly. This approach avoids user mistakes on running campaigns, but if a user tries to launch a test (even on draft campaign) he won't be able to modify the hierarchy further without deleting/recreating some activities/traces. So we should ignore this for test traces, but it could impact the behavior between test and actual executions.

opw-6251614

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#118994

Leaving a session open and idle (page open, no activity at all) eventually pops an error dialog:

    UncaughtPromiseError > RequestPendingError
    REGISTER request already in progress, waiting for final response
        at Registerer.register (sip.js)
        at Registerer.register (registerer.js)
        at UserAgent.attemptReconnection (user_agent_service.js)

When the WebSocket transport drops while a REGISTER is in flight (which happens on an idle tab: SIP.js sends a periodic re-REGISTER before the registration expires, and the socket may be closed by an idle timeout or by the machine going to sleep in the meantime), the final response never comes back. SIP.js only clears its internal `waiting` flag from the REGISTER response callbacks (onAccept/onReject/onRedirect); it is never reset on transport loss or request timeout. The Registerer is then stuck `waiting` forever, and every subsequent register() rejects with a RequestPendingError.

On top of that, our wrapper's register() did not return the SIP.js promise, and attemptReconnection() called it without awaiting, so the rejection escaped the surrounding try/catch and surfaced as an unhandled promise rejection. Worse, the WebSocket error was resolved right after, so the user appeared reconnected while VoIP registration was actually dead until the page was reloaded.

This commit makes register() recreate the underlying SIP.js Registerer when it is stuck `waiting` (a clean instance starts with waiting=false), and return the promise so callers can await it. attemptReconnection() now awaits it, so any rejection goes through the existing retry/back-off logic instead of bubbling up as an uncaught error.

The recreation is intentionally conditional: disposing a healthy registerer would send an unregister (REGISTER expires=0) racing with the fresh register (expires=600) and could leave us unregistered, so we only recreate when a request is actually stuck.

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#120107
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#119701

The `tax_ids` field on `pos.order.line` is defined with `readonly=True`. When editing a POS order from the backend (e.g. during a return/exchange flow), the `_onchange_product_id` method correctly sets `tax_ids` from the product, and the computed `tax_ids_after_fiscal_position` displays the mapped taxes in the UI. However, because `tax_ids` is readonly, the web client does not include it in the save payload. As a result, the taxes are silently dropped on save and `tax_ids_after_fiscal_position` recomputes to empty.

Steps to reproduce:
1. Create and pay a POS order with a product that has taxes
2. Go to the backend (Point of Sale > Orders) and open that order
3. Initiate a return for the order
4. In the return order, add a new product (exchange scenario)
5. Observe that taxes are correctly shown on the new line
6. Click Save
7. The taxes disappear from the order line

The fix adds `force_save="1"` to the `tax_ids` field in both the list and form views of `pos.order.line`, consistent with how `price_subtotal` and `price_subtotal_incl` are already handled in the same views.


---
I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#261103
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#253680