Description of the issue/feature this PR addresses:
The rating module does not correctly extend the mail modules onClick for NotificationItem

Current behavior before PR:
* mail NotificationItem onClick calls `this.onClickThread(isMarkAsRead, thread, message)`
* rating NotificationItem onClick calls `this.onClickThread(isMarkAsRead, thread)`
  * causing the [if in onClickThread](https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/18.0/addons/mail/static/src/core/public_web/messaging_menu.js#L39C17-L39C24) to be missed and falling backup to opening the thread
     ```javascript
            if (message?.needaction && message.message_type === "user_notification") {
                this.store.inbox.highlightMessage = message;
                this.openDiscussion(this.store.inbox);
                return;
            }
            this.openDiscussion(thread);
            return;
     ```

Desired behavior after PR is merged:
* rating should not change the fallback behaviour for messages without a rating_id and still allow opening the user_notification in inbox instead of switching to the thread

---
I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr

Info @wt-io-it

In certain cases the barcode of a product could be a valid standalone 
GS1 sequence. In that case it needs to be be correctly interpreted as 
a product scan.

### Steps to reproduce:

- In the settings enable "Default GS1 Nomenclature"
- Create a storable product P with the barcode 3701762412212
- Create and confirm a  delivery for 2 units of P and set the qty to 2
- Go to the barcode app and open your delivery
- Scan 3701762412212
> The line of P is now selected with a quantity of 1/2
- Scan 3701762412212
#### > A new line is created for 1762411 units

### Cause of the issue:

According to the GS1 nomenclature, the barcode 3701762412212 matches the scan of a quantity of "1762412" units of the lot name "2". As the scan of the of the product match a pattern for the GS1 nomenclature before matching a product, its barcode data is expected to be reset by these lines:
https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/7cceddaf086d849b8e2121e1023ef3479397534f/stock_barcode/static/src/models/barcode_model.js#L1320-L1324
In order to bypass the GS1 parser and to add 1 unit of the product. This is what happen on the first scan. However, performing the first scan also selects the associated line and, hence on the second scan the lines just above this check do set the product to match the product of the current line:
https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/7cceddaf086d849b8e2121e1023ef3479397534f/stock_barcode/static/src/models/barcode_model.js#L1294-L1320
In particular, we do not bypass the result provided by the GS1 parser and add `1762412` units of the product.

opw-6175621

**Steps to reproduce:**
- Install the `l10n_gt_edi` module and switch to a `GT Company`.
- Create a new vendor bill with:
  - Vendor: GT Company
  - GT Document Type: `FESP`
  - Add taxes `VAT Withholding 12%` and `ISR Withholding 5%` in Invoice lines.
- `Confirm` the bill and `Send to SAT`.
- From the gear icon, click `Download` > `PDF`.

**Error1:**
`KeyError: 'gran_total'`

**Error2:**
`KeyError: 'retencion_grand_total'`

**Root Cause:**
In commit [1], the code at [2] missed calling `_l10n_gt_edi_add_base_values()` 
before `_l10n_gt_edi_add_withholding_values()`. However, 
`_l10n_gt_edi_add_withholding_values()` uses the `gran_total` value, which is 
initialized by `_l10n_gt_edi_add_base_values()`, resulting in a `KeyError`.

Additionally, the report template at [3] references `retencion_grand_total` 
instead of the correct key `retencion_gran_total`, causing another `KeyError`.

**Fix:**
This commit prevents errors and ensures users can successfully download 
the PDF by applying a fix similar to [4],

[1]:
https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/commit/44afd19e4ed0827e343af0e584c81e579935c9e8

[2]:
https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/9846b337cfe1876017c7c2ce3041569d7a2ac03f/l10n_gt_edi/models/account_move.py#L305-L328

[3]:
https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/9846b337cfe1876017c7c2ce3041569d7a2ac03f/l10n_gt_edi/views/report_invoice.xml#L72

[4]:
https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/9846b337cfe1876017c7c2ce3041569d7a2ac03f/l10n_gt_edi/models/account_move.py#L790-L800

opw-6323049

**Steps to Reproduce:**
- Install the Accounting and Contacts modules.
- Enable Quick Encoding for Customer Invoices and Vendor Bills in the company 
  settings.
- Create a new customer: Assign a salesperson.
- Ensure:
  - The salesperson is not a login user.
  - The customer language, salesperson's language, and Login user's language 
    are different. Example:
     - Customer language: English
     - Salesperson language: French
     - Login user language: French
- Create a customer invoice using the Upload Document functionality.
- Select the customer created above.
- Use Quick Edit mode and enter an amount and Click Confirm.

**Issue:**
- When the invoice notification is rendered in a language different from the one
  used during the write operation, the notification rendering flow calls 
  _notify_by_email_prepare_rendering_context().
- During rendering, the code executes:
```
self.tax_totals.get('total_amount_currency', 0)
```
- Since tax_totals is protected, the ORM returns False instead of the expected
  dictionary, leading to:
```
AttributeError: 'bool' object has no attribute 'get'
```

**Root Cause:**
- This issue occurs in Quick Edit mode because tax_totals is [not read-only](https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/1f7a62d38303a992f501b4ecdb1bee437f7279b8/addons/account/views/account_move_views.xml#L1359) 
  in Quick Edit mode and is included in [the values](https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/1f7a62d38303a992f501b4ecdb1bee437f7279b8/addons/web/static/src/model/relational_model/record.js#L708) sent by the web client during write().
- During create()/write(), _get_protected_vals() marks tax_totals as protected.
- Since tax_totals is a [@api.depends_context('lang')](https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/1f7a62d38303a992f501b4ecdb1bee437f7279b8/addons/account/models/account_move.py#L975) computed field, it 
  maintains a separate cache per language. [During write()](https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/1f7a62d38303a992f501b4ecdb1bee437f7279b8/addons/account/models/account_move.py#L3955), the [field becomes 
  protected](https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/1f7a62d38303a992f501b4ecdb1bee437f7279b8/addons/account/models/account_move.py#L3863) by [env.protecting()](https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/1f7a62d38303a992f501b4ecdb1bee437f7279b8/odoo/orm/fields.py#L1738). While the protection is still active, the mail 
  notification flow renders the email using the recipient's language. If the 
  corresponding language-specific cache entry for tax_totals is not available, 
  the ORM cannot recompute the protected field and returns False instead 
  of the expected dictionary.

- The rendering code assumes tax_totals is always a dictionary and directly 
  calls  .get(), leading to the crash.

**Solution:**
- Exclude tax_totals from _get_protected_vals().
- tax_totals is already handled explicitly after create()/write(), so protecting 
  it is unnecessary. This allows the field to be recomputed during notification 
  rendering when required.

**Result:**
- Invoice notifications render correctly in all languages.
- No RPC crash occurs when rendering notifications after Quick Edit.

**Runbot reproduction: [video](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/5f045efb-37de-40aa-b135-1368b1601d61)**

**opw-6209647**

### Steps to reproduce:
- Download 'Sales' and 'Timesheets' apps
- Create a service product invoiced on delivered quantities with timesheet tracking
- Create and confirm a SO for quantity 1
- Log 20h on timesheets
- Invoice the SO
- Create a credit note for 11 hours => only 9 hours are invoiced
- Log 5h more on timesheets
- Back to the SO > create invoice again
> All the 25hrs are to invoiced, although 9 of them were invoiced before

### Cause of Issue:
When generating the new invoice, `_recompute_qty_to_invoice` calls `_get_delivered_quantity_by_analytic` which retrieves the analytic values for the SO line.

The values retrieved are later used to determine the delivered quantity, which is later assigned to be `line.qty_to_invoice` without taking into account the already invoiced hours. https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/7a6518e39d34575a3977e7c4a0053a45223e203c/addons/sale_timesheet/models/sale_order_line.py#L176-L186

### Fix:
Ensures that hours that have already been completely invoiced are deducted from the quantity to invoice.

opw-6253650

When generating an offer from the recruitment application and signing it, the applicant's email address is incorrectly displayed.

### **Steps to Reproduce:**
1) Install sign, recruitment, hr_contract_salary
2) Create an new application and add basic detail like name and email as
   (path and `path@test.com`)
3) Generate offer and sign with all the required signer(applicant and Marc Demo). 
4) Open the application form view and open the certificate.

### **Observed Behavior:**
Email is not set correctly in the generated certificate (appearing as `john@example.com`).

### **Expected Behavior:**
The email of the applicant should be correctly set(e.g as `path@test.com`)

### **Root Cause:**
When the applicant signs the document, their email is explicitly set to `False` at [1]. This is done because the applicant is not linked to any user yet. Later, when generating the certificate, the system attempts to display the user's partner email at [2], which is `False`, causing the default fallback value (`john@example.com`) to be printed.

[1]- https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/49226f4109c7d7bb48340949951e70f4245d0e5b/hr_contract_salary/controllers/main.py#L53-L54

[2]- https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/49226f4109c7d7bb48340949951e70f4245d0e5b/sign/report/sign_log_reports.xml#L59

### **Fix:**
Use `signer_email` instead of the partner's email to ensure the correct email is displayed on the certificate every time.

opw-6280170

In a multi-company setup with a website per company, the unsubscribe link in mass mailing emails could send recipients to the login page instead of the unsubscribe confirmation page.

### Steps to reproduce

1. Enable multi-company and create a second company `Company B`.
2. Create two websites with different domains, one per company:
   - `Website A` on the main company, domain `http://website-a.test`
   - `Website B` on `Company B`, domain `http://website-b.test`
3. Set the system parameter `web.base.url` to `http://website-a.test`. System parameters are global, so this value applies to the whole database regardless of the company you switch to.
4. Create a contact and set its `Company` field to `Company B`.
5. In Email Marketing, create a mailing with recipient model `Contact`, target the contact above, pick any template with an unsubscribe link, and send it.
6. Open the email in an incognito window and click the unsubscribe link: you land on the login page instead of the unsubscribe page.

### Cause

Mass mailing builds the unsubscribe link in two steps.

First, each email body is rendered for its recipient. While rendering, relative URLs like `/unsubscribe_from_list` are turned into absolute URLs by prepending a base URL. That base URL comes from the recipient record itself: `recipient.get_base_url()`. The `website` module overrides this so that, when the record has a company, it returns that company's website domain. For a contact in `Company B`, the body ends up with `http://website-b.test/unsubscribe_from_list`.

Second, right before sending, `mail_mail._prepare_outgoing_list` replaces that placeholder URL with a per-recipient signed URL pointing to `/confirm_unsubscribe`. It does this by plain string replacement: it looks for `{base_url}/unsubscribe_from_list` in the body and swaps it. The `base_url` used here came from `self.mailing_id.get_base_url()`. A mailing has no company, so its base URL falls back to the global `web.base.url`, which in our setup is `http://website-a.test`.

The two base URLs no longer match. The body contains the website B URL, but the replacement code searches for the website A URL. The search fails, the placeholder stays in the email, and the recipient clicks a link to `/unsubscribe_from_list`. That route only redirects to `/mailing/my`, which requires being logged in, so the user lands on the login page.

### Fix

Compute the base URL from the recipient record (the same record used when rendering the body) instead of the mailing. The two URLs then agree and the replacement works. Fall back to the mailing's base URL if there is no recipient model on the mail.

opw-4914203