Daily updates from Odoo
Wednesday, July 1, 2026
15 changes · saas-18.3
Enhancements to existing features
This change makes Odoo’s logging system easier to customize, allowing businesses and developers to define logging behavior in a more standard and flexible way. It also fixes an issue where custom log levels could be misread, which helps keep log output and configuration consistent.
Original PR description
Stable friendly backport of #270562 Less elements where moved, cleaned, removed, ... keeping the minimal changes to make it work in stable. Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#273127
Resolved issues and error corrections
The Helpdesk quick-create form now only shows customers that belong to the selected company. This prevents users working across multiple companies from accidentally choosing a customer from the wrong one.
Original PR description
Steps to reproduce: - Create two companies (Company A and Company B) - Create one partner in each company - Enable both companies for the user - Open Helpdesk and go to the tickets Kanban view for a Company A team. - In the quick create form, the customer dropdown shows customers from Company B Issue: - Customers from other companies are visible in the customer field, Cause: - The partner_id field in the quick create view had no domain, so it displayed partners from all allowed companies. Solution: - Added a domain on partner_id in the ticket quick create form view. task-4971466 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#121944
This change fixes an issue that prevented users from downloading the PDF of certain Guatemala vendor bills. It ensures the report is generated correctly so businesses can access and share the document without errors.
Original PR description
**Steps to reproduce:** - Install the `l10n_gt_edi` module and switch to a `GT Company`. - Create a new vendor bill with: - Vendor: GT Company - GT Document Type: `FESP` - Add taxes `VAT Withholding…
**Steps to reproduce:** - Install the `l10n_gt_edi` module and switch to a `GT Company`. - Create a new vendor bill with: - Vendor: GT Company - GT Document Type: `FESP` - Add taxes `VAT Withholding 12%` and `ISR Withholding 5%` in Invoice lines. - `Confirm` the bill and `Send to SAT`. - From the gear icon, click `Download` > `PDF`. **Error1:** `KeyError: 'gran_total'` **Error2:** `KeyError: 'retencion_grand_total'` **Root Cause:** In commit [1], the code at [2] missed calling `_l10n_gt_edi_add_base_values()` before `_l10n_gt_edi_add_withholding_values()`. However, `_l10n_gt_edi_add_withholding_values()` uses the `gran_total` value, which is initialized by `_l10n_gt_edi_add_base_values()`, resulting in a `KeyError`. Additionally, the report template at [3] references `retencion_grand_total` instead of the correct key `retencion_gran_total`, causing another `KeyError`. **Fix:** This commit prevents errors and ensures users can successfully download the PDF by applying a fix similar to [4], [1]: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/commit/44afd19e4ed0827e343af0e584c81e579935c9e8 [2]: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/9846b337cfe1876017c7c2ce3041569d7a2ac03f/l10n_gt_edi/models/account_move.py#L305-L328 [3]: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/9846b337cfe1876017c7c2ce3041569d7a2ac03f/l10n_gt_edi/views/report_invoice.xml#L72 [4]: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/9846b337cfe1876017c7c2ce3041569d7a2ac03f/l10n_gt_edi/models/account_move.py#L790-L800 opw-6323049 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#122030
This fix prevents a traceback that could happen when a negative forecast demand is entered in the last period. It also ensures any remaining negative quantity is correctly applied to the first forecast, preserving the intended planning behavior.
Original PR description
Steps to reproduce: - Fresh DB - Add a negative number to the forecast demand in the last period Cause: A variable was used without declaration Fix: According to odoo/enterprise#56128, it was intended that any remaining negative quantity to add should be added to the first forecast. Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#122261
The spreadsheet component has been updated to the latest version, bringing the latest fixes and maintenance changes. It also improves how pivot tables handle certain records, which helps avoid display or calculation issues in some accounting-related spreadsheets.
Original PR description
### Contains the following commits: https://github.com/odoo/o-spreadsheet/commit/d00e4b62c5 [REL] 18.3.54 [Task: 0](https://www.odoo.com/odoo/2328/tasks/0)…
### Contains the following commits: https://github.com/odoo/o-spreadsheet/commit/d00e4b62c5 [REL] 18.3.54 [Task: 0](https://www.odoo.com/odoo/2328/tasks/0) https://github.com/odoo/o-spreadsheet/commit/722416eaf1 [FIX] config: bump node version in GH action [Task: 0](https://www.odoo.com/odoo/2328/tasks/0) https://github.com/odoo/o-spreadsheet/commit/5c888b116c [IMP] pivot: give full dimension to pivot normaliser [Task: 6023622](https://www.odoo.com/odoo/2328/tasks/6023622) Co-authored-by: Florian Damhaut (flda) <flda@odoo.com> Co-authored-by: Anthony Hendrickx (anhe) <anhe@odoo.com> Co-authored-by: Alexis Lacroix (laa) <laa@odoo.com> Co-authored-by: Lucas Lefèvre (lul) <lul@odoo.com> Co-authored-by: Adrien Minne (adrm) <adrm@odoo.com> Co-authored-by: Ronak Mukeshbhai Bharadiya (rmbh) <rmbh@odoo.com> Co-authored-by: Dhrutik Patel (dhrp) <dhrp@odoo.com> Co-authored-by: Rémi Rahir (rar) <rar@odoo.com> Co-authored-by: Pierre Rousseau (pro) <pro@odoo.com> Co-authored-by: Vincent Schippefilt (vsc) <vsc@odoo.com> Co-authored-by: Marceline Thomas (matho) <matho@odoo.com>
Posting an Instagram update with an image no longer risks crashing the server when Instagram takes too long to fetch the image. Instead, the post is now marked as failed with a clearer message, helping users retry with a smaller image or try again later.
Original PR description
Making an Instagram containing an image can crash the server with an unhandled `ReadTimeout` instead of marking the post as failed. ### Cause When creating a media container, Odoo passes a URL pointing to its own server and Instagram fetches the image from it server-side before responding. The timeout therefore covers network latency, Instagram's download speed from the Odoo server, and image processing time, making it prone to being exceeded. When it is, `requests` raises a `ReadTimeout` which is unhandled, leading to a raw RPC error instead of a clean `state='failed'`. ### Fix Catch the network errors and mark the post as failed instead of letting them crash the request. Timeouts get a message suggesting a smaller image, since they are usually caused by Instagram fetching and processing a large image server-side. Any other request error falls back to a generic message. opw-6015997 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#112573
This fix keeps the rating menu in sync with the messaging behavior so users can open notification messages correctly. It prevents the rating extension from overriding the normal fallback, which avoids sending users to the wrong conversation view.
Original PR description
Description of the issue/feature this PR addresses: The rating module does not correctly extend the mail modules onClick for NotificationItem Current behavior before PR: * mail NotificationItem…
Description of the issue/feature this PR addresses:
The rating module does not correctly extend the mail modules onClick for NotificationItem
Current behavior before PR:
* mail NotificationItem onClick calls `this.onClickThread(isMarkAsRead, thread, message)`
* rating NotificationItem onClick calls `this.onClickThread(isMarkAsRead, thread)`
* causing the [if in onClickThread](https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/18.0/addons/mail/static/src/core/public_web/messaging_menu.js#L39C17-L39C24) to be missed and falling backup to opening the thread
```javascript
if (message?.needaction && message.message_type === "user_notification") {
this.store.inbox.highlightMessage = message;
this.openDiscussion(this.store.inbox);
return;
}
this.openDiscussion(thread);
return;
```
Desired behavior after PR is merged:
* rating should not change the fallback behaviour for messages without a rating_id and still allow opening the user_notification in inbox instead of switching to the thread
---
I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr
Info @wt-io-it
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#244521The email shown on signature certificates is now taken from the applicant’s actual email instead of a fallback value. This ensures recruitment offers signed through Sign display the right contact information and avoids confusing mismatches in records.
Original PR description
When generating an offer from the recruitment application and signing it, the applicant's email address is incorrectly displayed. ### **Steps to Reproduce:** 1) Install sign, recruitment,…
When generating an offer from the recruitment application and signing it, the applicant's email address is incorrectly displayed. ### **Steps to Reproduce:** 1) Install sign, recruitment, hr_contract_salary 2) Create an new application and add basic detail like name and email as (path and `path@test.com`) 3) Generate offer and sign with all the required signer(applicant and Marc Demo). 4) Open the application form view and open the certificate. ### **Observed Behavior:** Email is not set correctly in the generated certificate (appearing as `john@example.com`). ### **Expected Behavior:** The email of the applicant should be correctly set(e.g as `path@test.com`) ### **Root Cause:** When the applicant signs the document, their email is explicitly set to `False` at [1]. This is done because the applicant is not linked to any user yet. Later, when generating the certificate, the system attempts to display the user's partner email at [2], which is `False`, causing the default fallback value (`john@example.com`) to be printed. [1]- https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/49226f4109c7d7bb48340949951e70f4245d0e5b/hr_contract_salary/controllers/main.py#L53-L54 [2]- https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/49226f4109c7d7bb48340949951e70f4245d0e5b/sign/report/sign_log_reports.xml#L59 ### **Fix:** Use `signer_email` instead of the partner's email to ensure the correct email is displayed on the certificate every time. opw-6280170 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#120566
This change prevents invoices from crashing when a user removes the currency after choosing a payment term. If no currency is selected, the system now safely uses the journal or company currency as a fallback so payment terms can still be computed without error.
Original PR description
Currently, an error occurs on an invoice when user selects a payment term and removes the currency. Steps to replicate: - Install account - Turn on multiple currencies - Open invoices. - Create a new…
Currently, an error occurs on an invoice when user selects a payment term and removes the currency. Steps to replicate: - Install account - Turn on multiple currencies - Open invoices. - Create a new invoice - Add a line - Add a customer - Save - Select payment term as `30% Now, Balance 60 Days` - Remove the currency. Error: ``` ValueError: Expected singleton: res.currency() ``` Cause: - This error only occurs when the selected payment term contains at least two due term lines [1]. - When the selected payment term has atleast two lines the check [1] assigns `on_balance_line` as false and the `else` block is evaluated where currency being an empty recordset (as the user removed it) causes the error from [line] when trying to perform `round()` on an empty res.currency recordset. Solution: - As the currency is a required field, user will not be able to save the record until a currency is assigned. - Used journal's currency or company's currency as a fallback when computing payment terms if the current currency is empty. [1]: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/177002c0aca95de2de6458bb65bedf5c74541ac0/addons/account/models/account_payment_term.py#L229 [line]: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/177002c0aca95de2de6458bb65bedf5c74541ac0/addons/account/models/account_payment_term.py#L240 sentry-7569922293 --- I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#272073
This fix ensures that imported CODA bank statements use the full communication text as the payment reference when the reference is not structured. This makes it easier to match bank transactions with the correct payments and reduces manual cleanup.
Original PR description
### Issue: When a CODA file was imported, the communication was fetched but it wasn't use as the payment ref Causing difficulty to match with the transactions ### Cause: For simplicity reason, the payment_ref and the communication where different The `payment_ref` was fetched once and replace The `communication` was always completed by new lines ### Steps to reproduce: - Install `l10n_be_coda` - Set the account on the Bank Journal to GR5605700000000928073840752 - Import the Simplied CODA (On the ticket) from the bank dashboard Before the fix, the ref was just `Liquidation des ventes par carte Mastercard` instead of the full communication that can be found in the chatter opw-6245848 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#120536
This fix prevents invoice email notifications from crashing when an invoice is created in Quick Edit and later rendered in another language. It ensures the invoice totals can be safely recalculated during notification sending, so users can confirm invoices without encountering errors.
Original PR description
**Steps to Reproduce:** - Install the Accounting and Contacts modules. - Enable Quick Encoding for Customer Invoices and Vendor Bills in the company settings. - Create a new customer: Assign a…
**Steps to Reproduce:**
- Install the Accounting and Contacts modules.
- Enable Quick Encoding for Customer Invoices and Vendor Bills in the company
settings.
- Create a new customer: Assign a salesperson.
- Ensure:
- The salesperson is not a login user.
- The customer language, salesperson's language, and Login user's language
are different. Example:
- Customer language: English
- Salesperson language: French
- Login user language: French
- Create a customer invoice using the Upload Document functionality.
- Select the customer created above.
- Use Quick Edit mode and enter an amount and Click Confirm.
**Issue:**
- When the invoice notification is rendered in a language different from the one
used during the write operation, the notification rendering flow calls
_notify_by_email_prepare_rendering_context().
- During rendering, the code executes:
```
self.tax_totals.get('total_amount_currency', 0)
```
- Since tax_totals is protected, the ORM returns False instead of the expected
dictionary, leading to:
```
AttributeError: 'bool' object has no attribute 'get'
```
**Root Cause:**
- This issue occurs in Quick Edit mode because tax_totals is [not read-only](https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/1f7a62d38303a992f501b4ecdb1bee437f7279b8/addons/account/views/account_move_views.xml#L1359)
in Quick Edit mode and is included in [the values](https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/1f7a62d38303a992f501b4ecdb1bee437f7279b8/addons/web/static/src/model/relational_model/record.js#L708) sent by the web client during write().
- During create()/write(), _get_protected_vals() marks tax_totals as protected.
- Since tax_totals is a [@api.depends_context('lang')](https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/1f7a62d38303a992f501b4ecdb1bee437f7279b8/addons/account/models/account_move.py#L975) computed field, it
maintains a separate cache per language. [During write()](https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/1f7a62d38303a992f501b4ecdb1bee437f7279b8/addons/account/models/account_move.py#L3955), the [field becomes
protected](https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/1f7a62d38303a992f501b4ecdb1bee437f7279b8/addons/account/models/account_move.py#L3863) by [env.protecting()](https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/1f7a62d38303a992f501b4ecdb1bee437f7279b8/odoo/orm/fields.py#L1738). While the protection is still active, the mail
notification flow renders the email using the recipient's language. If the
corresponding language-specific cache entry for tax_totals is not available,
the ORM cannot recompute the protected field and returns False instead
of the expected dictionary.
- The rendering code assumes tax_totals is always a dictionary and directly
calls .get(), leading to the crash.
**Solution:**
- Exclude tax_totals from _get_protected_vals().
- tax_totals is already handled explicitly after create()/write(), so protecting
it is unnecessary. This allows the field to be recomputed during notification
rendering when required.
**Result:**
- Invoice notifications render correctly in all languages.
- No RPC crash occurs when rendering notifications after Quick Edit.
**Runbot reproduction: [video](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/5f045efb-37de-40aa-b135-1368b1601d61)**
**opw-6209647**
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#266335Survey participants will now move to the next page correctly after reviewing scored answers, instead of being sent back to the homepage. This fixes a broken step in multi-page surveys and prevents users from losing their progress.
Original PR description
**Step To reproduce :** 1. Create a survey with `Scoring` set to `Scoring with answers after each page` 2. Add at least 2 pages, each with 1+ scorable question 3. As a public user, open the survey…
**Step To reproduce :**
1. Create a survey with `Scoring` set to `Scoring with answers after each page`
2. Add at least 2 pages, each with 1+ scorable question
3. As a public user, open the survey and start answering
4. Fill in the first page and click Continue
5. Correct answers are displayed with green/red highlights, submit button is replaced by Next
6. Click Next
7. Redirected to the homepage instead of the second page
**Issue:**
When survey scoring type is 'scoring_with_answers_after_page', after submitting a page the correct answers are displayed along with a "Next" button. Clicking "Next" redirects the user to the homepage because the answer_token is lost.
**Reason:**
The `<button id="next_page">` has no explicit `type` attribute, so it defaults to `type="submit"` per HTML spec. When clicked, the browser's default form submission fires a POST to `/survey/<survey_token>` (the answer_token is never in the URL path — only in the cookie). On the last page, `_nextScreen()` deletes the survey cookie to clean up after completion. The concurrent form POST then arrives at the server with answer_token=None → `token_required` → `redirect("/")`.
Additionally, jQuery's event delegation matches `button[type="submit"]` against the `type` property (which is `"submit"` by default for bare `<button>` elements), triggering `_onSubmit` which makes a second stale RPC call, compounding the issue.
**Solution:**
Added `event.preventDefault()` in the Next button's click handler within `_showCorrectAnswers` to stop the browser's default form submission behavior at the event level. This prevents the unintended POST request regardless of the button's type attribute, ensuring only the JS-driven `_nextScreen` transition executes.
opw-6268296
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#269476This change prevents an error that could occur when opening Talent Pools from an application if duplicate talent records existed. It helps recruiters access talent pools reliably and avoids a disruptive traceback in day-to-day use.
Original PR description
When multiple talent records share the same information, opening the Talent Pools smart button from a matching application will trigger a traceback. Steps to reproduce the error: - Install…
When multiple talent records share the same information, opening the Talent Pools smart button from a matching application will trigger a traceback. Steps to reproduce the error: - Install ``hr_recruitment`` module with demo data - Go to Recruitment > Applications > Talent Pools > Create a new pool - Go to Recruitment > Applications > All Applications > Create a new application with valid email > Click Add to Pool > Select the Talent Pool > Add to Pool - Duplicate the created talent record - Create another application with the same email > save > click Talent Pools Traceback: ```py ValueError: Expected singleton: hr.applicant(2, 1) ``` https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/d4e76a5663223a2a2c6e50d1701fabbdcaf32405/addons/hr_recruitment/models/hr_applicant.py#L857-L859 Here, the talent is searched using matching applicant information. When a matching talent has been duplicated, the search returns multiple records. Assigning a multi-records to the many2one field ``pool_applicant_id`` then raises a singleton error. Solution: Restrict the duplication of talent. sentry-7556261128 --- I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#270827
The expense counter on Sales Orders now includes all expenses linked to the order, not only those that created a sales order line. This makes the smart button number match the list of expenses users see when they open it, avoiding confusion.
Original PR description
**Before this commit** Only expenses that generated a sale order line on an SO would be counted in that SO's count of expenses, introducing confusing behavior with the smart button on the SO form view that would take the user to a list of all expenses that have anything to do with the current SO. **After this commit** We return to the behavior that was present in Odoo 18.1 where all expenses that are associated with a SO show up in that SO's "expense_count", making the number in the smart button consistent with the number of expenses that will be fetched when clicking on it. opw-6309575 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#272287
This change ensures invoices sent to Guatemala’s Infile service keep special characters like ñ, á, and é intact. It reduces failed submissions and prevents certified XML files from being corrupted by using the correct XML content type and UTF-8 encoding.
Original PR description
**Steps to reproduce:** * Install the **l10n_gt_edi** module. * Configure a Guatemalan company with valid Infile credentials in the settings. * Create a product or customer with special characters…
**Steps to reproduce:**
* Install the **l10n_gt_edi** module.
* Configure a Guatemalan company with valid Infile credentials in the settings.
* Create a product or customer with special characters (e.g. `ñ`, `á`, `é`) in their name.
* Create a customer invoice containing this product/customer.
* Confirm the invoice to trigger the EDI send to the SAT (Infile).
**Observed behavior:**
* Infile intermittently rejects the invoice due to validation errors, or accepts it but the resulting certified XML has truncated or malformed text exactly where the special characters were located.
**Cause:**
* Odoo uses the `requests.post()` library to send the XML payload to Infile. By default, `requests` encodes string payloads using `latin-1` unless told otherwise.
* Because the request was missing the explicit `Content-Type: application/xml` header and the XML string was not explicitly encoded to `utf-8` before sending, Infile parsed the payload using an incorrect encoding. This caused it to drop or misinterpret special characters, leading to validation failures or corrupted XML content.
**Fix:**
* Explicitly include the `'Content-Type': 'application/xml'` header in the request to Infile.
* Explicitly encode the `xml_data` payload to `utf-8` (`xml_data.encode('utf-8')`) before passing it to `requests.post()` to guarantee the correct encoding is sent over the wire.
opw-6315654
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#121729