Thursday, July 2, 2026
8 changes · saas-18.4
Resolved issues and error corrections
Oversized WebP images are now rejected during upload, matching the existing 50-megapixel limit applied to other image formats. This prevents unusually large image files from being accepted and helps keep website media handling consistent and reliable.
Original PR description
Since 17.0, `webp` images can be uploaded at any resolution, whereas every other format is refused above IMAGE_MAX_RESOLUTION (50 Mpx) when the attachment is created on the server. Root cause…
Since 17.0, `webp` images can be uploaded at any resolution, whereas every other format is refused above IMAGE_MAX_RESOLUTION (50 Mpx) when the attachment is created on the server. Root cause =========== `ImageProcess` grouped webp together with empty sources and SVG and set `self.image = False`, returning before the `verify_resolution` check. As a result the resolution limit enforced for `png/jpeg/...` was never applied to `webp`. Fix === Split `webp` out of the skip branch: it is still not processed as before, but its resolution is now read from the RIFF header with `get_webp_size()` and checked against `IMAGE_MAX_RESOLUTION`, so oversized webp images are refused on upload like any other format. Steps to reproduce =================== 1. Edit any page with the website editor 2. Upload a `webp` image larger than 50 Mpx (e.g. 8000x8000) => The image is accepted, while a `png/jpeg` of the same size is refused task-4134430 --- I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#273140 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#273010
Fixes a problem that could cause installation of the Spanish VeriFactu e-invoicing module to time out or fail on databases that already contain accounting entries. This makes setup more reliable for existing Spanish accounting deployments.
Original PR description
### Description: When trying to install the module `l10n_es_edi_verifactu` on a database that already has moves, it is possible to encounter a timeout or a memory error. This is caused by the compute `l10n_es_edi_verifactu_state` and `l10n_es_edi_verifactu_clave_regimen`, both compute linked to the new model `l10n_es_edi_verifactu.document`. ### Reference: opw-6293590 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#271550
Short tracking links created by background processes now use the configured main system URL instead of an arbitrary company website domain. This prevents email marketing links from pointing to the wrong domain in multi-company setups while preserving existing behavior for normal website-based flows.
Original PR description
The [`_compute_short_url_host`](https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/a81fa8699c89385d2cccb260ada07255c6ea1275/addons/website_links/models/link_tracker.py#L20-L24) override builds link.tracker short URLs…
The [`_compute_short_url_host`](https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/a81fa8699c89385d2cccb260ada07255c6ea1275/addons/website_links/models/link_tracker.py#L20-L24) override builds link.tracker short URLs from `website.get_current_website()` and the current company's website domain. It was introduced by https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/f13ecb15af7f0bdc67e37dfb41e8bac77f5a541a for a multi-company backend flow (users switching companies to post social marketing links), but it runs for every compute, including CRON contexts with no HTTP request such as the mass-mailing queue. Without a request, `get_current_website()` picks an arbitrary website (the first in the database) and `self.env.company` resolves to the user's main company, so the short URL uses that company's website domain instead of `web.base.url`. Fall back to `super()._compute_short_url_host()` (which uses `web.base.url`) when no website is resolvable from the request, session, or context. Backend flows with a real request still hit the company-aware branch. Steps to reproduce: 1. Install Email Marketing and Website. 2. Settings > Companies: create a second company B. Settings > Websites: ensure website A points to company A with domain A, and create website B for company B with domain B. 3. Settings > Technical > Parameters > System Parameters: set `web.base.url` to a third domain C, and add `web.base.url.freeze` = `True`. 4. On company A, Email Marketing: create a mailing with body `<a href="http://example.com">test</a>` and a recipient list, then click Send. 5. Settings > Technical > Automation > Scheduled Actions > "Mass Mailing: Process queue" > Run Manually. 6. Email Marketing > Configuration > Link Tracker: open the tracker generated for the mailing. => The Tracked URL uses domain A. => The Tracked URL uses domain C. Ticket [link](https://www.odoo.com/odoo/project.task/6038590) opw-6038590 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#259200
Mass mailing unsubscribe and view links now use the website linked to each recipient’s company instead of a global default website. This prevents customers in multi-company setups from being sent to a login page and ensures email and SMS opt-out links work on the correct company website.
Original PR description
In a multi-company setup with a website per company, the unsubscribe link in mass mailing emails could send recipients to the login page instead of the unsubscribe confirmation page. ### Steps to…
In a multi-company setup with a website per company, the unsubscribe link in mass mailing emails could send recipients to the login page instead of the unsubscribe confirmation page.
### Steps to reproduce
1. Enable multi-company and create a second company `Company B`.
2. Create two websites with different domains, one per company:
- `Website A` on the main company, domain `http://website-a.test`
- `Website B` on `Company B`, domain `http://website-b.test`
3. Set the system parameter `web.base.url` to `http://website-a.test`. System parameters are global, so this value applies to the whole database regardless of the company you switch to.
4. Create a contact and set its `Company` field to `Company B`.
5. In Email Marketing, create a mailing with recipient model `Contact`, target the contact above, pick any template with an unsubscribe link, and send it.
6. Open the email in an incognito window and click the unsubscribe link: you land on the login page instead of the unsubscribe page.
### Cause
Mass mailing builds the unsubscribe link in two steps.
First, each email body is rendered for its recipient. While rendering, relative URLs like `/unsubscribe_from_list` are turned into absolute URLs by prepending a base URL. That base URL comes from the recipient record itself: `recipient.get_base_url()`. The `website` module overrides this so that, when the record has a company, it returns that company's website domain. For a contact in `Company B`, the body ends up with `http://website-b.test/unsubscribe_from_list`.
Second, right before sending, `mail_mail._prepare_outgoing_list` replaces that placeholder URL with a per-recipient signed URL pointing to `/confirm_unsubscribe`. It does this by plain string replacement: it looks for `{base_url}/unsubscribe_from_list` in the body and swaps it. The `base_url` used here came from `self.mailing_id.get_base_url()`. A mailing has no company, so its base URL falls back to the global `web.base.url`, which in our setup is `http://website-a.test`.
The two base URLs no longer match. The body contains the website B URL, but the replacement code searches for the website A URL. The search fails, the placeholder stays in the email, and the recipient clicks a link to `/unsubscribe_from_list`. That route only redirects to `/mailing/my`, which requires being logged in, so the user lands on the login page.
### Fix
Compute the base URL from the recipient record (the same record used when rendering the body) instead of the mailing. The two URLs then agree and the replacement works. Fall back to the mailing's base URL if there is no recipient model on the mail.
opw-4914203
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#273364
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#264055This update ensures that products whose barcode also matches a GS1 pattern are recognized correctly as product scans. It prevents the system from misreading repeated scans as a large quantity change, which avoids incorrect delivery lines and stock quantities.
Original PR description
In certain cases the barcode of a product could be a valid standalone GS1 sequence. In that case it needs to be be correctly interpreted as a product scan. ### Steps to reproduce: - In the settings…
In certain cases the barcode of a product could be a valid standalone GS1 sequence. In that case it needs to be be correctly interpreted as a product scan. ### Steps to reproduce: - In the settings enable "Default GS1 Nomenclature" - Create a storable product P with the barcode 3701762412212 - Create and confirm a delivery for 2 units of P and set the qty to 2 - Go to the barcode app and open your delivery - Scan 3701762412212 > The line of P is now selected with a quantity of 1/2 - Scan 3701762412212 #### > A new line is created for 1762411 units ### Cause of the issue: According to the GS1 nomenclature, the barcode 3701762412212 matches the scan of a quantity of "1762412" units of the lot name "2". As the scan of the of the product match a pattern for the GS1 nomenclature before matching a product, its barcode data is expected to be reset by these lines: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/7cceddaf086d849b8e2121e1023ef3479397534f/stock_barcode/static/src/models/barcode_model.js#L1320-L1324 In order to bypass the GS1 parser and to add 1 unit of the product. This is what happen on the first scan. However, performing the first scan also selects the associated line and, hence on the second scan the lines just above this check do set the product to match the product of the current line: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/7cceddaf086d849b8e2121e1023ef3479397534f/stock_barcode/static/src/models/barcode_model.js#L1294-L1320 In particular, we do not bypass the result provided by the GS1 parser and add `1762412` units of the product. opw-6175621 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#122256 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#120035
This fix ensures the SAF-T export uses the correct official grouping code when account numbers are sliced. It prevents the report from showing an incorrect code, helping maintain accurate statutory reporting.
Original PR description
Steps to reproduce: - change 1920 Banck account to 19204321 - go in general ledger and export to "SAF-T" Issue: The grouping code is 4321 Grouping code should match official grouping code. As a matter of fact the chart of account seems to match thos grouping account if we slice them correctly. opw-6285078 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#121932
When a booking comes in through Reserve with Google, Odoo now uses the customer’s first and last name from Google instead of falling back to the email address. This means new contacts, appointment titles, and attendee details show the real customer name, while existing contacts matched by email keep their current name.
Original PR description
When a customer books through Reserve with Google, the createBooking payload carries the booker given_name and family_name next to the email, but the handler passed only the normalized email to…
When a customer books through Reserve with Google, the createBooking payload carries the booker given_name and family_name next to the email, but the handler passed only the normalized email to _mail_find_partner_from_emails. The new res.partner was therefore created with its name falling back to the email, see https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/aa7b5921191a0ff53ef1cc32af99fe458c45c0da/addons/mail/models/res_partner.py#L177 That name then flows into the calendar.event name, the attendee common_name and the contact details, all showing the email instead of the customer name. The module has read neither field since it was added in https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/commit/2e855b910173b56e8501d0ebe9ee6f83ac5845bc. Build the booker name from given_name and family_name and pass it with the email through formataddr in google_reserve_booking_create, so a newly created partner is named after the customer. A partner matched on an existing email keeps its current name. Steps to reproduce: 1. Enable Reserve with Google on an appointment type. 2. Book a slot from Google Maps with given name John and family name Doe. 3. Open the created booking and its contact in Odoo. => the contact name is the email instead of John Doe Ticket [link](https://www.odoo.com/odoo/project/49/tasks/6232318) opw-6232318 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#120604
This update strengthens the security of our kiosk-based point-of-sale system by ensuring the payment endpoint correctly verifies the system is a kiosk and that an IoT payment method is properly configured. This enhances reliability and protects against potential errors during transactions.
Original PR description
This commit makes the payment endpoint more robust by verifying the POS config is indeed a kiosk, and that it has an IoT payment method configured. Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#122560 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#121894