Thursday, July 2, 2026
6 changes · saas-18.4
Resolved issues and error corrections
This update ensures that products whose barcode also matches a GS1 pattern are recognized correctly as product scans. It prevents the system from misreading repeated scans as a large quantity change, which avoids incorrect delivery lines and stock quantities.
Original PR description
In certain cases the barcode of a product could be a valid standalone GS1 sequence. In that case it needs to be be correctly interpreted as a product scan. ### Steps to reproduce: - In the settings…
In certain cases the barcode of a product could be a valid standalone GS1 sequence. In that case it needs to be be correctly interpreted as a product scan. ### Steps to reproduce: - In the settings enable "Default GS1 Nomenclature" - Create a storable product P with the barcode 3701762412212 - Create and confirm a delivery for 2 units of P and set the qty to 2 - Go to the barcode app and open your delivery - Scan 3701762412212 > The line of P is now selected with a quantity of 1/2 - Scan 3701762412212 #### > A new line is created for 1762411 units ### Cause of the issue: According to the GS1 nomenclature, the barcode 3701762412212 matches the scan of a quantity of "1762412" units of the lot name "2". As the scan of the of the product match a pattern for the GS1 nomenclature before matching a product, its barcode data is expected to be reset by these lines: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/7cceddaf086d849b8e2121e1023ef3479397534f/stock_barcode/static/src/models/barcode_model.js#L1320-L1324 In order to bypass the GS1 parser and to add 1 unit of the product. This is what happen on the first scan. However, performing the first scan also selects the associated line and, hence on the second scan the lines just above this check do set the product to match the product of the current line: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/7cceddaf086d849b8e2121e1023ef3479397534f/stock_barcode/static/src/models/barcode_model.js#L1294-L1320 In particular, we do not bypass the result provided by the GS1 parser and add `1762412` units of the product. opw-6175621 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#122256 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#120035
This change updates the Mexican SAT XML trial balance report so the XML elements appear in the order expected by the tax authority. The report content stays the same, but the file now matches the official layout more closely, reducing the risk of compliance issues or review friction.
Original PR description
**Steps to reproduce:** - Install the `l10n_mx_reports` module and switch to a Mexican company. - Navigate to Accounting > Reporting > Trial Balance. - From the dropdown menu, click `SAT (XML)`. -…
**Steps to reproduce:** - Install the `l10n_mx_reports` module and switch to a Mexican company. - Navigate to Accounting > Reporting > Trial Balance. - From the dropdown menu, click `SAT (XML)`. - Open the generated XML file and inspect the `<BCE:Ctas>` nodes. **Observation:** - The generated XML uses the following attribute order: `Debe > NumCta > Haber > SaldoFin > SaldoIni` - However, the SAT-recommended structure is: `NumCta > SaldoIni > Debe > Haber > SaldoFin` **Root Cause:** At [1], the attributes of the `<BCE:Ctas>` node are defined in an order that differs from the SAT-recommended structure. While the XML remains valid, the generated report does not match the layout recommended by the Mexican government specification. **Fix:** This commit reorders the `<BCE:Ctas>` attributes to follow the SAT-recommended structure, aligning the generated XML with the behavior introduced at [2] for `saas-19.3`. backport-of: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/pull/115374 [1]: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/cb9c19272309d793379fa4d23145162f72fa5552/l10n_mx_reports/data/templates/cfdibalance.xml#L15-L20 [2]: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/acf0929a88ec788aecd44f6b4c647e468dc0a319/l10n_mx_reports/data/templates/cfdibalance.xml#L17-L22 opw-6297711 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#122469 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#121440
This change fixes a test failure affecting Swedish payment files when two related accounting modules are installed together. It keeps the test suite stable after a previous update to how creditor agent information is handled in SEPA exports.
Original PR description
Here https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/pull/114662 we changed the way the CdtrAgt node is used in the SEPA XML file for Sweden. But this change broke a test when both account_iso20022 & l10n_se_bban are installed, leading to a Non-expected child error. This commit skip the failling test if l10n_se_bban is installed, and add a new one to replace it. runbot-938366 runbot-938367 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#122359 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#121485
This fix ensures the SAF-T export uses the correct official grouping code when account numbers are sliced. It prevents the report from showing an incorrect code, helping maintain accurate statutory reporting.
Original PR description
Steps to reproduce: - change 1920 Banck account to 19204321 - go in general ledger and export to "SAF-T" Issue: The grouping code is 4321 Grouping code should match official grouping code. As a matter of fact the chart of account seems to match thos grouping account if we slice them correctly. opw-6285078 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#121932
When a booking comes in through Reserve with Google, Odoo now uses the customer’s first and last name from Google instead of falling back to the email address. This means new contacts, appointment titles, and attendee details show the real customer name, while existing contacts matched by email keep their current name.
Original PR description
When a customer books through Reserve with Google, the createBooking payload carries the booker given_name and family_name next to the email, but the handler passed only the normalized email to…
When a customer books through Reserve with Google, the createBooking payload carries the booker given_name and family_name next to the email, but the handler passed only the normalized email to _mail_find_partner_from_emails. The new res.partner was therefore created with its name falling back to the email, see https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/aa7b5921191a0ff53ef1cc32af99fe458c45c0da/addons/mail/models/res_partner.py#L177 That name then flows into the calendar.event name, the attendee common_name and the contact details, all showing the email instead of the customer name. The module has read neither field since it was added in https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/commit/2e855b910173b56e8501d0ebe9ee6f83ac5845bc. Build the booker name from given_name and family_name and pass it with the email through formataddr in google_reserve_booking_create, so a newly created partner is named after the customer. A partner matched on an existing email keeps its current name. Steps to reproduce: 1. Enable Reserve with Google on an appointment type. 2. Book a slot from Google Maps with given name John and family name Doe. 3. Open the created booking and its contact in Odoo. => the contact name is the email instead of John Doe Ticket [link](https://www.odoo.com/odoo/project/49/tasks/6232318) opw-6232318 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#120604
This update strengthens the security of our kiosk-based point-of-sale system by ensuring the payment endpoint correctly verifies the system is a kiosk and that an IoT payment method is properly configured. This enhances reliability and protects against potential errors during transactions.
Original PR description
This commit makes the payment endpoint more robust by verifying the POS config is indeed a kiosk, and that it has an IoT payment method configured. Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#122560 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#121894