Monday, July 6, 2026
17 changes · saas-18.3
Enhancements to existing features
Budget reports now use the same profitability classification as analytic profitability reporting when selecting analytic accounting entries. This helps businesses compare budgets and profitability with more consistent figures across reports.
Original PR description
Use the new field analytic_profitability in the conditions of the query to get the account analytic lines of the budget report task-4959636 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#121760
This update adds a 'Profitability' field to account analytic lines, enabling a clearer breakdown of revenue and loss within the Analytic Report. This enhancement provides better visibility into profitability trends and improves financial analysis capabilities.
Original PR description
[IMP] account: group analytic items by profitability This commit add a new field 'Profitability' on the account analytic line model, this will allow to visually split analytic line items in 2 categories: 'Revenue' and 'Loss' in the Analytic Report task-4959636 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#262962
Resolved issues and error corrections
Task progress bars in the Gantt view now show the correct completion level based on logged timesheets and allocated hours. This prevents under-reporting progress visually, helping teams quickly understand task status in planning views.
Original PR description
Steps to reproduce: ------------------------------------------- 1. Install the Timesheet module with demo data 2. Go to any FSM task > set allocated hours to 20h 3. Fill the timesheet for the same…
Steps to reproduce: ------------------------------------------- 1. Install the Timesheet module with demo data 2. Go to any FSM task > set allocated hours to 20h 3. Fill the timesheet for the same task for 10h 4. Navigate to FSM > My Tasks > Gantt view Observation: ------------------------------------------- Look at the task on the Gantt chart. The shading is barely visible because it covers only 0.5% of the bar, not 50% Issue: ------------------------------------------- In the commit https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/137570/changes/4a93d9aee957dd3feb3db0cb69eb3b8f0f4a4683 The progress field computation was changed from storing percentage values (0-100) to storing decimal values (0-1). Specifically, the `_compute_progress_hours` method was modified. This change was made to standardize the progress field storage format, with the understanding that the UI layer would multiply by 100 when displaying the value. While most views (form, list, kanban, etc.) were updated to multiply the progress by 100 for display purposes, the Gantt view's pill progress bar was missed. Solution: ------------------------------------------- Overrides the `enrichPill` method to multiply the `_progress` value by 100 before it's passed to the template. This ensures the Gantt pill progress bars display correctly without modifying the core web_gantt module. Before --------------------------- <img width="268" height="368" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/6d35927f-bd3f-47fc-9101-e2e188d419b8" /> After: -------------------------- <img width="250" height="371" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/fe7133e0-26d1-4c5f-b903-48826fda9488" /> opw-6038983 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#111270
This fixes an error that could occur when updating quantities on confirmed Field Service sales orders while an incoming-message automation rule is active. The change keeps background message handling compatible with automation, so users can adjust catalog quantities without being blocked by a crash.
Original PR description
Steps to reproduce: ---------------------------------------- 1. Install `industry_fsm_sale` and `base_automation` modules 2. Create a product with: * Type: Service * Create on order: Task * Project:…
Steps to reproduce:
----------------------------------------
1. Install `industry_fsm_sale` and `base_automation` modules
2. Create a product with:
* Type: Service
* Create on order: Task
* Project: Field Service
3. Create an automation rule with:
* Model: Sales order
* Trigger: Incoming message
4. Create and confirm a sale order with this product
5. Add another product to the SO via the catalog view:
* Change the quantity to 2 or more
Observation:
----------------------------------------
Traceback occurs:
```
File '/home/odoo/src/odoo/addons/base_automation/models/base_automation.py', line 871, in _message_post
message_sudo = message.sudo().with_context(active_test=False)
AttributeError: 'bool' object has no attribute 'sudo'
```
Root Cause:
----------------------------------------
* Catalog qty change calls `set_fsm_quantity()` method
* Setting `fsm_quantity` triggers its inverse `_inverse_fsm_quantity()`, which writes the new qty to the SOL, but passes `fsm_no_message_post=True` in context to suppress chatter noise
https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/ac5d670832a5e0db714c0bd056e1406b50bb4c17/industry_fsm_sale/models/product_product.py#L72-L83
* `sale.order.line.write()` detects a qty change on a confirmed order and calls `_update_line_quantity()`, which posts a message on the parent sale order
* FSM's `message_post` override sees the context flag and returns `False`
* When `base_automation` has an `on_message_received` rule on `sale.order`, it wraps `message_post` at registry load time. That wrapper calls `sudo()` on whatever `message_post` returns, Which was `False`
Solution:
----------------------------------------
Return `self.env['mail.message']` (empty recordset) instead of False, it's still falsy, but it's a proper ORM object that `sudo()` can be called on
opw-6276916
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#119542This fixes DHL delivery validation when shipments are processed from a company other than the main one. Commercial invoice numbers are now generated correctly, preventing DHL rejection errors for eligible international deliveries.
Original PR description
Issue ----- When validating a delivery in a different company from the main one, the commercial invoice's number field is incorrect, which raises an error on DHL end.…
Issue ----- When validating a delivery in a different company from the main one, the commercial invoice's number field is incorrect, which raises an error on DHL end. `content/exportDeclaration/invoice/number: expected type: String, found: Boolean` Steps to reproduce ----- - Create a Belgian company - Setup DHL - DHL Product D - Express Worldwide - Dutiable Material enabled - Create an amrican customer - Deliver a product to the american customer > Validation Error Cause ----- The field is populated in https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/cf3c2fce8a6b7b2d7547d44a0e4423f887986d52/delivery_dhl_rest/models/dhl_request.py#L204 The problem is that `next_by_code` uses the company found in the env, whereas the sequence's company is the main one, so it is not found when doing https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/e3b0ca11d99b2ef819cdad68b169112cd73668b6/odoo/addons/base/models/ir_sequence.py#L287 ----- Ticket: opw-6171886 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#118379
The barcode app now better identifies the existing owner of consigned stock when scanning delivery items, including products without lot tracking. This prevents duplicate stock records and helps deliveries use the correct available inventory.
Original PR description
### Steps to reproduce: - In the settings enable: "Storage Locations" and "Consignment" - Create a storable product and put 1 unit in stock with a set owner - Go to the barcode app > Operations >…
### Steps to reproduce: - In the settings enable: "Storage Locations" and "Consignment" - Create a storable product and put 1 unit in stock with a set owner - Go to the barcode app > Operations > Delivery Orders > New - Scan your product and validate #### > The owner was not set on the stock move line so that a new quant was created and updated in stock rather than using the available unit. ### Cause of the issue: The mechanism of prefilling an owner or a package in the barcode app is currently gate-kept behind the existence of a lot name: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/0be4f71de3420fb9b72fd4e70d48c6cbbbc0ecb4/stock_barcode/static/src/models/barcode_model.js#L1382-L1407 However, the option also make sense for none tracked products. ### Note: Performing the flow form the backend and adding quantity will generate the move line by setting the owner if possible since the quantity of a move is set via the back end, move lines are generated by looking at the existing quant data's: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/5d61c03b33c9a915684dd59656f8be7612956dd1/addons/stock/models/stock_move.py#L2364 https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/5d61c03b33c9a915684dd59656f8be7612956dd1/addons/stock/models/stock_move.py#L2328-L2330 Setting the same owner on the new move line as on the quant we are going to reserve: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/5d61c03b33c9a915684dd59656f8be7612956dd1/addons/stock/models/stock_move.py#L2337 https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/5d61c03b33c9a915684dd59656f8be7612956dd1/addons/stock/models/stock_move.py#L1715 Additional subtelties appearing when prefilling for non tracked product: 1. Currently the available quantity is not taken into account to determine if the the value provided to the prefilled is actually relevant, in particular if there is a quant with an available quantity of 0, it will be used as a valid value to prefill and it will parasit the prefill that could be done by other quants. 2. The location source used to determine the quants taken into account is not set on the first scan since the scan is performed without any existing line: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/4f0d25f9fe4ca8ff1b0ecd7900899a2a246ba888/stock_barcode/static/src/models/barcode_model.js#L1387 > This was not problematic with respect to tracked product since the product needs to be scanned prior to the lot, hence there is always a current line when the the lot is scanned. opw-6050657 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#121996 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#115021
Hong Kong payroll now calculates payment in lieu of notice based on the employee's actual contract start date instead of assuming a full prior 12 months. This improves payroll accuracy for employees with shorter service periods and adds test coverage for related edge cases.
Original PR description
Currently, the calculation of the payment in lieu of notice is assuming the employee worked a whole 12 months prior to it being paid. This is of course not always going the be case, and when it happens our calculation is often incorrect. We update the salary rule to calculate a more accurate total days (which is no longer based on a fixed 12-month period but takes into account the contract's start date). We also now calculate the number of months more accurately by taking, once again, the contract's start date into account. Also adding a few test cases to test a bit more some special case we didn't yet test correctly. task-6348903 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#122580
This update fixes a potential issue where Point of Sale records weren't being fully initialized before setup processes. By ensuring all records are created first, this change improves the stability and reliability of the Point of Sale module, preventing errors during initial configuration or data loading. This resolves a previously reported problem impacting data consistency.
Original PR description
This commit change the behavior of loadData to ensure that all records are linked & created before calling setup method of each of them. related task: 4922193 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#229128 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#228820
This update fixes an unexpected accrual of holiday days that occurred when carryover balances were applied at the beginning of the year. The fix ensures accruals only happen at the standard period boundaries (start/end of month or level transitions), resolving a confusing and inaccurate calculation. This improves the reliability of holiday balance tracking.
Original PR description
## Issue Currently, an extra accrual happens on carryover date, but it shouldn't. Indeed, accrual only happened at the start - end of a period, or on level transition. ## Reproducing steps Let's take an accrual plan with a level that adds 2 days/month on the 15th of the month. The carryover takes place at the beginning of the year. So we will have this: - 2025-11-01 -> creation of the allowance, 0 days available - 2025-11-15 -> 1 day (only 15 days are counted, so only half of the days are added) - 2025-12-15 -> 3 days (1 full month elapsed) - 2026-01-01 -> 4 days (as the carryover triggers an accrual) -> this event causes confusion as the accrual seems to “come out of nowhere” - 2026-01-15 -> 5 days - 2026-02-15 -> 7 days task-5432188 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#245201
This update resolves an issue where importing vendor bills from KSeF would fail if custom taxes were used. Now, the system automatically detects and processes FA(3) XML files, dynamically matching KSeF tax codes to the correct purchase tax rates. This ensures smoother and more accurate bill imports for users with customized tax configurations.
Original PR description
…oder signature When importing a vendor bill from KSeF, the system strictly relied on official Odoo tax XML IDs (e.g., `vz_kraj_23`). If a user had custom taxes (e.g., from a third-party localization), the import would crash with a UserError indicating the tax was not found. Allow manually uploading a FA(3) XML file to vendor bills, and it is detected automatically by the system This commit fixes these issues by: 1. Implementing a smart fallback tax search. If the official XML ID is not found, it dynamically searches for a matching purchase tax based on the KSeF tax code (e.g., '23' -> 23% purchase tax, 'zw' -> 0%). 2. Adding an adapter method that matches the expected EDI decoder signature, processes the file data, and writes the parsed values to the draft invoice. task-6067168 --- I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#256818
This update allows invoices in Italy to include both the 0% DoI tax and other applicable taxes on a single line. Previously, the system incorrectly excluded DoI tax amounts, leading to incorrect plafond calculations. This change ensures accurate tax calculations and reporting for Italian customers.
Original PR description
- Create a declaration of intent in the customer's contact - Issue an invoice that includes both the 0% E (DoI tax) and any other tax - You will see how the plafond is not updated and the amount of this invoice is not deducted from it The method _compute_l10n_it_edi_doi_amount specifically exclude from the doi amount lines with the doi tax and another tax. However it should be possible to use both on a single line. We can use the amount subtotal because the doi is always 0%. opw-6253475 --- I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#267669
This update resolves an issue where batch payment sequences were incorrectly created when a new company was initially set up. The change ensures sequences are properly associated with the correct company, preventing errors during payment processing. This improves the reliability of our payment system.
Original PR description
Previously, batch payment sequence will be created by simply select to create new company due to having lambda in default. Hence, the created sequence does not have a correct company_id set as company hasn't yet created. Switch to creating sequence in ``create`` function to avoid this issue. Also use ``range_year`` for payment prefix because it was set to use date range. Description of the issue/feature this PR addresses: Current behavior before PR: Desired behavior after PR is merged: --- I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#273487 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#268689
This update fixes an issue where invoices weren't accurately reflecting timesheet hours after a partial refund was issued on a sales order. The change ensures that previously invoiced hours are properly deducted when generating new invoices, preventing over-invoicing and ensuring accurate reporting. This improves the reliability of sales order billing.
Original PR description
### Steps to reproduce: - Download 'Sales' and 'Timesheets' apps - Create a service product invoiced on delivered quantities with timesheet tracking - Create and confirm a SO for quantity 1 - Log 20h…
### Steps to reproduce: - Download 'Sales' and 'Timesheets' apps - Create a service product invoiced on delivered quantities with timesheet tracking - Create and confirm a SO for quantity 1 - Log 20h on timesheets - Invoice the SO - Create a credit note for 11 hours => only 9 hours are invoiced - Log 5h more on timesheets - Back to the SO > create invoice again > All the 25hrs are to invoiced, although 9 of them were invoiced before ### Cause of Issue: When generating the new invoice, `_recompute_qty_to_invoice` calls `_get_delivered_quantity_by_analytic` which retrieves the analytic values for the SO line. The values retrieved are later used to determine the delivered quantity, which is later assigned to be `line.qty_to_invoice` without taking into account the already invoiced hours. https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/7a6518e39d34575a3977e7c4a0053a45223e203c/addons/sale_timesheet/models/sale_order_line.py#L176-L186 ### Fix: Ensures that hours that have already been completely invoiced are deducted from the quantity to invoice. opw-6253650 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#273156 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#268025
This update corrects a bug where unreserving a production order would prevent byproducts from being created. The fix ensures that byproducts are properly adjusted when an order is unreserved, maintaining accurate inventory levels. This resolves an issue impacting production planning and material availability.
Original PR description
On a mo that has byproducts, if you unreserve, it will also set the quantity of byproducts to 0 Steps to reproduce: ------------------- * Create a Products main, component and byproduct * Create a…
On a mo that has byproducts, if you unreserve, it will also set the quantity of byproducts to 0 Steps to reproduce: ------------------- * Create a Products main, component and byproduct * Create a bom for main with component as component and byproduct as byproduct * Create and confirm a mo for main * Set qty_producing to quantity ot produce * click on "Unreserve" (do_unreserve) * click on "Check availability" (action_assign) * Produce All -> the byproducts will not be produced. Observation: ------------- When updating the qty_producing value it will also update the quantity of the byproducts moves: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/77b180e8251fb8019e0034e1c2f485fd2c34ea4e/addons/mrp/models/mrp_production.py#L892-L893 https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/77b180e8251fb8019e0034e1c2f485fd2c34ea4e/addons/mrp/models/mrp_production.py#L1350 https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/77b180e8251fb8019e0034e1c2f485fd2c34ea4e/addons/stock/models/stock_move.py#L2382 The quantity on the byproducts move has been updated. When clicking on Unreserve it will call do_unreserve, https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/aca2e226143487b421f79194d677bb48d5da1358/addons/mrp/models/mrp_production.py#L2297-L2298 It will filters the moves that do not need to be unreserved and select the others: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/aca2e226143487b421f79194d677bb48d5da1358/addons/stock/models/stock_move.py#L900 and it will unlink all the sml from the moves: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/aca2e226143487b421f79194d677bb48d5da1358/addons/stock/models/stock_move.py#L919 Which will set the quantity on the byproduct moves to 0. When Producing all (button_mark_done) since the qty_producing has already been set, it will simply mark the byproduct move has picked. https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/aca2e226143487b421f79194d677bb48d5da1358/addons/mrp/models/mrp_production.py#L1323-L1324 In our case, this means that the no byproducts will be created since, the quantity was previously set to 0 opw-6296562 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#272216
This update resolves an issue where reverting inventory adjustments with packages resulted in negative quantities appearing within those packages. The fix ensures that quantities are accurately restored after a revert, preventing inconsistencies in package inventory levels. This improves data accuracy and reliability for stock management.
Original PR description
Currently when the user reverts an inventory adjustment move line with a package the package contains extra line showing negative quantity of the product. ## Steps to produce: - Install Inventory…
Currently when the user reverts an inventory adjustment move line with a package the package contains extra line showing negative quantity of the product.
## Steps to produce:
- Install Inventory without demo data
- Settings Enable 'Packages'
- Create a product:
- Cheese burger
- On hand > Create a new quant
- Package: 'Burgerbox' and 'On Hand Quantity`: 1 and save
- Set the On Hand quantity to zero and save
- History > Revert the Inventory adjustment line from WH/stock to Inventory adjustment by selecting it and reverting via actions.
- Products > Packages > BurgerBox
## Observed Behaviour:
After reverting an inventory adjustment that set the product's physical quantity to 0, the package contains two lines for the same product with quantities 1 and -1.
This is inconsistent because a package should not contain a product with a negative quantity.
The package should be restored to its original state and contain only the expected positive quantity.
## Root cause:
When the user reverts the move line, `action_revert_inventory` is called. This method creates the revert move and then marks that move as done at [1].
Marking the move as done subsequently marks all related move lines as done at [2]. During this process, the system first unreserves the quantity from the virtual location / inventory adjustment and then removes the quantity from that location (resulting in a -1 quantity move line at that location). This is performed through `_synchronize_quant`, which is responsible for synchronizing the physical inventory with the move line at [3].
The `_synchronize_quant` method uses the move line's `package_id` when updating the corresponding quant at [4]. As a result, `_update_available_quantity` creates a new quant with the following values at [5]:
```
{
'product_id': 1,
'location_id': 14,
'lot_id': stock.lot(),
'package_id': 1,
'owner_id': res.partner(),
'in_date': datetime.datetime(2026, 6, 22, 12, 42, 11),
'quantity': -1.0,
}
```
This creates a quant with a negative quantity that is linked to the package because `package_id` is set on the newly created quant. Consequently, the move line with the negative quantity becomes associated with the package.
[1]-
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/333c279be7cba9fda17d2818be36f4d96d8cd0f6/addons/stock/models/stock_move_line.py#L1016-L1035
[2]-
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/333c279be7cba9fda17d2818be36f4d96d8cd0f6/addons/stock/models/stock_move.py#L1956 [3]-
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/333c279be7cba9fda17d2818be36f4d96d8cd0f6/addons/stock/models/stock_move_line.py#L662-L666
[4]-
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/333c279be7cba9fda17d2818be36f4d96d8cd0f6/addons/stock/models/stock_move_line.py#L678-L687
[5]-
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/333c279be7cba9fda17d2818be36f4d96d8cd0f6/addons/stock/models/stock_quant.py#L1130-L1143
## Solution:
Remove the source `package_id` when creating revert moves for inventory adjustment locations.
When an inventory adjustment sets a product's quantity to 0, the adjustment is completed without a destination package, meaning the product is effectively removed from the package. Therefore, the corresponding revert move should not retain the package as its source. Keeping the package as the source is inconsistent because package information should not exist on a virtual inventory adjustment location, and the original inventory adjustment removes the product from the package (there is no destination package).
By removing the source `package_id` from the revert move, the system avoids creating negative quants associated with the package during quant synchronization. This also ensures that, after the inventory adjustment is reverted, the quantities of products inside the package are restored correctly and match their state prior to the adjustment.
opw-6285739
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#273632
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#271440This update fixes an issue where expense accounts weren't being correctly applied during Point of Sale transactions. Now, when a sale is made without invoicing, the system accurately maps expense accounts based on the fiscal position or product category, ensuring accurate financial reporting. This improves the reliability of financial data generated from Point of Sale.
Original PR description
**Steps to reproduce:** - Make a product with a category - In the category, make the inventory valuation to automated - Set the income and expense account - Set a cost for the product - Make a fiscal…
**Steps to reproduce:** - Make a product with a category - In the category, make the inventory valuation to automated - Set the income and expense account - Set a cost for the product - Make a fiscal position and set it as default for the PoS - In the Account Mapping tab, map the income and expense to two other accounts - Go to the PoS - Make a sale for that product, without invoice - Close the session and in the backend check the session - Check the journal entries - The income account has been mapped to the fiscal position's - The outcome account stayed the same as in the category's **Why the fix:** When we invoice an order, the income and expense accounts are immediately updated, in a different place than if it has not been invoiced. At the session's closure, we update the accounts for every order that hasn't been invoiced. In this flow, the account mapping defined on the fiscal position was not applied, so we took the one defined on the product's category. The income account was already mapped as we need to do it earlier than the session closure, so it had already been set as the right one before our flow. For the expense account, we only need it at this specific time, so we can map it as the session's closure. We now map the account depending on the fiscal position if we are able to find one, otherwise, we use the category's default as we did before. opw-6171677 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#266700
This update ensures that taxes and order totals are accurately displayed when customers select in-store pickup for international orders. Previously, the system incorrectly applied VAT, leading to inaccurate checkout summaries. This fix automatically recalculates taxes and updates the checkout summary to match the selected pickup location.
Original PR description
Backport of : https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/269057 to V18 When an international customer selects an in-store pickup location, the order's fiscal position changes to the fiscal position matching…
Backport of : https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/269057 to V18 When an international customer selects an in-store pickup location, the order's fiscal position changes to the fiscal position matching the pickup warehouse. However, the order-line taxes and checkout summary are not recomputed immediately. **Steps to reproduce:** 1. Configure a French company and website. 2. Configure a product priced at 100 ( just an example , any price will do ) EUR excluding 20% French VAT. 3. Configure an export fiscal position removing VAT for Japan. 4. Configure an international delivery method. 5. Configure an in-store pickup method with a warehouse located in France. 6. Checkout using a Japanese delivery address. 7. Select the international delivery method. 8. Switch to pickup in store. **Current behavior:** - The order fiscal position changes to the French fiscal position. - Product-line taxes and the checkout summary remain based on the export fiscal position. - French VAT only appears later on the payment step. - Switching back to international delivery can similarly leave stale totals. **Expected behavior:** - Selecting the French pickup location immediately applies French VAT. - Switching back to international delivery immediately removes French VAT. - Totals displayed during delivery selection match the payment-step totals. **Cause:** The Click & Collect flow explicitly recomputes `fiscal_position_id` when selecting or leaving an in-store pickup location, but it does not recompute the order-line taxes and prices. Additionally, the pickup-location route does not return updated order-summary values, so the checkout page cannot refresh its displayed totals. **Solution:** - Recompute taxes and prices when the in-store fiscal position changes. - Restrict the recomputation to draft website orders. - Return the updated order summary after selecting a pickup location. - Refresh the checkout summary using the returned values. **Tests cover:** - Japanese delivery with export fiscal position and no VAT. - Switching to a French pickup location immediately applying 20% VAT. - Switching back to international delivery removing VAT. - Delivery-step totals matching payment-step recomputation. - Pickup-location route returning updated summary values. --- I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#269086