Friday, July 10, 2026
11 changes · saas-19.2
New functionality added to Odoo
Odoo can now recognize and contact WhatsApp users using business-scoped user IDs, even when a phone number is not shared. This helps businesses keep customer conversations connected to the right contact and improves matching when phone number formats differ.
Original PR description
Add support for whatsapp business-scoped user ids as outline in the [documentation](https://developers.facebook.com/documentation/business-messaging/whatsapp/business-scoped-user-ids) for their introduction this June. This effectively adds a table mapping BSUID to contacts to enable contacting users who contact the business directly, as the business will now not necessarily be provided with their number. Additionally the “whatsapp id”, i.e. the canonical form of the phone number as stored in whatsapp, is stored to help better match contacts regardless of formatting details in odoo and whatsapp. task-5476552 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#117782
This update introduces support for Georgian accounting standards, including a new chart of accounts, tax reporting, and VAT compliance. This expansion allows businesses operating in Georgia to utilize Odoo's accounting features fully, meeting local tax regulations.
Original PR description
[ADD] l10n_ge: add Georgian Chart of Accounts - This commit adds the Georgian accounting localization, including the chart of accounts, taxes, fiscal positions, tax groups, and VAT report required for standard accounting and tax reporting flows - It provides support for domestic VAT, reverse charge VAT, and the Georgian VAT declaration report. taskID-3927928 related PR (from saas-19.3 to master) - https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/263765 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#263452
Enhancements to existing features
Deleting electronic document attachments in the Chilean localization is now much faster, especially for databases with many invoices or stock transfers. This reduces waiting time and improves day-to-day system performance for affected customers.
Original PR description
## The problem Deleting attachments checks foreign key triggers. Lookups in `account_move` and `stock_picking` tables for `ir_attachment` related fields coming from `l10n_cl_edi` overrides were slow due to missing indexes. ## The solution Added needed indexes to optimize triggers' lookups. ## Benchmark Time benchmark (deleting attachments from a customer database with 224K account moves and 204K stock pickings): |# of rows|Time (Before)|Time (After)| |----------|--------------|-------------| 100 | 29s | 16ms 1000 | 285s | 300ms OPW-6331845 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#123350 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#123252
Resolved issues and error corrections
The project Gantt view now correctly shades unavailable periods when a user has employees in multiple selected companies. This keeps the visual schedule aligned with time-off warnings, helping planners avoid assigning work during approved absences.
Original PR description
Steps to reproduce: - Create one user linked to two companies. - Create one employee per company for that user. - Select one company and approve a time off for the employee. - Open Tasks > Gantt and…
The Time Off planning Gantt view now uses paging and opens with an overview scale by default. This should make large planning schedules easier and faster to browse, improving the experience for managers reviewing employee absences.
Original PR description
Add paging and default scale as the overview gantt task-6381315
Steps to reproduce: - Create one user linked to two companies. - Create one employee per company for that user. - Select one company and approve a time off for the employee. - Open Tasks > Gantt and create a task during the approved time-off period the warning is shown and the Gantt cell is grayed out. - Select both companies and create a task during the same time-off period in Tasks > Gantt. Issue: When multiple companies are selected, the time-off warning is still displayed but the corresponding Gantt cells are no longer grayed out, leading to an inconsistency between the warning logic and the Gantt rendering. Cause: In multi-company setups, a user can be linked to multiple resources. The Gantt unavailability logic assumed a one-to-one relationship between user and resource causing unavailability intervals from some resources to be overwritten. Solution: Aggregate unavailability intervals from all resources linked to the same user, limited to the selected companies, and merge them with the company calendar unavailability to ensure consistent Gantt gray rendering. Related PR: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/pull/57028 task-5089385 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#123659 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#105288
This fixes a Barcode app issue where users could scan additional unreserved products after completing the reserved items, even when the operation type disabled extra products. The change keeps inventory operations aligned with their configuration and helps avoid unintended stock movements.
Original PR description
# How to reproduce - Go to Inventory > Settings > Operation Types - Pick any Operation and disable "Allow extra product" - Create a picking for that operation type with atleast one product and click…
# How to reproduce - Go to Inventory > Settings > Operation Types - Pick any Operation and disable "Allow extra product" - Create a picking for that operation type with atleast one product and click on "Mark as Todo" - Go to the Barcode app and find the created picking - Scan all the reserved products - Exit the picking and re-enter # The problem The "Add Product" button is displayed and you can scan unreserved products even tough you sould not be allowed to # Cause of the issue The problem stems from the fact that even with "Allow extra product" disabled, we still allow to add unreserved products for immediate transfers (created directly in the barcode app). The issue is that we don't really have a way to distinguish immediate transfers from plannified ones made in the Inventory app. So we try to guess using the `_useReservation` attribute (If it is false, we allow additional products). `_useReservation` is computed as follows : if any move lines from the inital state is not yet picked, set it to true : https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/ca4b369e4fc9f4655574cf1ca71c81faaadc3e88/stock_barcode/static/src/models/barcode_picking_model.js#L43 So in our case, once all the reserved products are scanned, all the initial move lines are picked and our guessing fails. # Proposed Solution Since immediate transfers are never validated and stays in draft mode, guess using the state of the current picking in addition to `useReservation` opw-6231238 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#118378
Fixed an issue where expanding a Knowledge article in the sidebar could show only favorited child articles while hiding the other children. This ensures users can reliably see the full article structure without needing to reload the page.
Original PR description
The sidebar always loads the user's favorite articles along with the visible ones, so a favorited article is shown as a root of the favorite tree. When that favorite is also a child of a folded…
The sidebar always loads the user's favorite articles along with the visible ones, so a favorited article is shown as a root of the favorite tree. When that favorite is also a child of a folded article, it gets added to its parent's child_ids in the main tree, even though the parent's other children were not fetched. A folded article only gets its favorited children back from get_sidebar_articles, not its whole child set. When the parent is then unfolded, unfold() only read the children from the database when child_ids was empty. The favorited child already filled child_ids, so the call was skipped and the remaining children stayed hidden until the next reload. unfold() now uses a new children_loaded flag instead of the length of child_ids to decide whether to fetch the children. The flag is set once an article's whole child set is loaded: in loadChildren(), and in loadArticles() for the articles that were unfolded, since those come back with all their children. loadChildren() also rebuilds child_ids from the search result so a favorite already loaded is not added twice. The fix lives in the sidebar component because the partial child_ids only exists on the frontend, get_sidebar_articles already returns the right records. Steps to reproduce: 1. Open the Knowledge app 2. Create an article with two child articles 3. Add one of the two children to your favorites with the star icon 4. Open another article that is not under that parent 5. Fold the parent article in the sidebar, then refresh the page 6. Expand the parent article => only the favorited child is shown under the parent, the other child is missing Ticket [link](https://www.odoo.com/odoo/project.task/6186466) opw-6186466 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#118804
Kenyan point-of-sale refund validation no longer fails when the refund is synced together with the original sale. This keeps refund processing and eTIMS reporting working reliably, including when multiple offline orders are synced at once.
Original PR description
Steps to reproduce: 1. Install `l10n_ke_edi_oscu_pos`, set company to Kenya. 2. Sell and validate an order. 3. Refund it from the POS and validate the refund order. Issue: - A traceback is raised…
Steps to reproduce: 1. Install `l10n_ke_edi_oscu_pos`, set company to Kenya. 2. Sell and validate an order. 3. Refund it from the POS and validate the refund order. Issue: - A traceback is raised when validating the refund: `ValueError: Expected singleton: pos.order(<refund>, <original>)` raised in `get_l10n_ke_edi_oscu_pos_data`. Cause: - When syncing a refund, `sync_from_ui` returns both the new refund order and the original refunded order. `waitForPushOrder` forces post-processing for every Kenyan order in that list, so `beforePostPushOrderResolve` receives both ids in `order_server_ids` and forwards them as-is to `action_post_order` and `get_l10n_ke_edi_oscu_pos_data`, both of which expect a single record. `action_post_order` fails the same way, but its error was silently swallowed by the surrounding try/catch, letting the traceback surface only on the second call. - The same multi-id list is also produced whenever several orders created offline get synced together once back online. Solution: - `get_l10n_ke_edi_oscu_pos_data` is only needed for the receipt of the order being validated, so call it with `order.id` instead of the full `order_server_ids` list. - Replace the `action_post_order` call with `action_post_selected_orders`, which posts each order individually and skips ones already sent to eTIMS, correctly handling both the refund case (original order is already `sent`) and the offline multi-order sync case. opw-6364221 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#123043
Appointment blocks using the picture or list layout now show prices according to the website's tax display setting. This prevents customers from seeing tax-excluded prices when the site is configured to show tax-included prices.
Original PR description
When the `appointments_template_picture` and `appointments_template_list` templates were added to `website_appointment_account_payment` in 19.0+, the corresponding overrides in `website_appointment_sale` were not added. This caused the picture and list appointment blocks to display prices using `product_lst_price` (always tax-excluded), ignoring the website's tax display setting (`show_line_subtotals_tax_selection`). The cards template already had a proper override using `_get_combination_info()`, which correctly handles everything. Steps to reproduce: 1. Go to Website > Configuration > Settings > enable "Tax Included" 2. Create an appointment type with a product that has taxes 3. Edit website page > add "Appointments" snippet > select "Picture" or "List" layout => price shown is tax-excluded Ticket [link](https://www.odoo.com/odoo/project.task/5799252) opw-5799252 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#106643
The Argentine VAT Book ZIP export no longer fails for foreign partners marked as foreign providers. This helps businesses complete required tax reporting without manual workarounds when invoices involve overseas partners.
Original PR description
Steps to reproduce: - Create a partner with: - State: Ireland - Identification Number: Foreign ID 55000004153 - ARCA Responsibility Type: Proveedor del Exterior - Create an invoice for the partner - Accounting > Reporting > Tax report - Select Report: VAT Book (AR), Tax Type: Sales - Click on gear icon > VAT Book (ZIP) Issue: Action will be blocked with error "No VAT configured for partner [58] <partner>" Analysis: Partners with ARCA responsibility type 'Proveedor del Exterior' (code 8) and a ForeignID identification type, causes a UserError when exporting the VAT Book (ZIP). Code 8 (foreign provider) is the purchase-side counterpart of code 9 (foreign customer), which already fell back to the country-level VAT. Extend the existing fallback branch to cover both codes. opw-6316008 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#123506
A recent update introduced an access error for users without Employee record access when using the Overtime Rulesets feature. This fix restricts the visibility of a new 'Stat' button to authorized users, ensuring a smooth experience for administrators while maintaining the feature's functionality for those with appropriate permissions.
Original PR description
**Steps to reproduce:** 1. Install the **Attendance** app in saas-19.2 with demo data. 2. Log in as a user who has **Administrator** rights in the Attendance app but no access rights in the Employees…
**Steps to reproduce:**
1. Install the **Attendance** app in saas-19.2 with demo data.
2. Log in as a user who has **Administrator** rights in the Attendance app but no access rights in the Employees app.
3. Go to **Attendance → Configuration → Overtime Rulesets**.
4. Open any overtime ruleset.
An `AccessError` is raised:
```
File "/home/odoo/src/odoo/saas-19.2/odoo/orm/models.py", line 3373,
in check_access
raise result[1]()
odoo.exceptions.AccessError: You are not allowed to access
'Employee Record' (hr.version) records.
This operation is allowed for the following groups:
- Employees/Administrator
- Employees/Officer: Manage all employees
Contact your administrator to request access if necessary.
```
**Issue:**
A new feature introduced an employee count stat button on `hr.attendance.overtime.ruleset` in [v19.2](https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/236555/changes).
Users who have administer right in Attendance app but do not have access to Employee records trigger an access error when opening the ruleset.
**Solution:**
The fix restricts the visibility of the [Stat button ](https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/7c6f31d730304bca3f6c996800e76d1e40ce4adf/addons/hr_attendance/views/hr_attendance_overtime_rule_views.xml#L114)to users with the required Employee groups, preventing the access error while keeping the feature available for authorized users.
opw- 6358550
upg- 4449776
---
I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr