Thursday, July 23, 2026
4 changes · saas-19.1
Resolved issues and error corrections
Fixes an issue where Chilean delivery guides could fail when delivering kits that include components measured differently from the kit product. Businesses can now print delivery guides for these kit deliveries without encountering pricing-related errors.
Original PR description
When a kit is delivered, each component move is linked to the kit's sale order line. Pricing the delivery guide in "sale order" mode converted the component quantity into the kit's sale UoM. For a component sold in a different UoM category than the kit, this cross-category conversion raises a UserError. Steps to reproduce: - Create a BoM for a kit product with a component in a different UoM category - Create a customer with Delivery Guide Price = "From Sale Order" - Sold the kit in a sale order and deliver it - On the delivery, print the delivery guide -> error This fix makes the guide price for a component move to be "product" if the component's product is different from the related sale line product, avoiding the cross-category UoM conversion. opw-6327895 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#125114 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#122776
This fixes Belgian annual statement XBRL exports generated in Dutch so required true/false and unit values are no longer translated. The change prevents invalid files from being rejected by the Belgian National Bank validator for affected report types.
Original PR description
Steps to reproduce: - Set the user language to Dutch. - Go to Accounting > Reporting > Annual Statements. - Generate the XBRL export for a report other than the "company, abridged" (acon) balance…
Steps to reproduce:
- Set the user language to Dutch.
- Go to Accounting > Reporting > Annual Statements.
- Generate the XBRL export for a report other than the "company,
abridged" (acon) balance sheet/P&L combination, e.g. an association
(asso_a/asso_f) or "company, full"/"company, capital" report.
- Open the file: the `<met:bln1>` boolean facts are exported as
"onwaar" instead of "false", which is not a valid XBRL boolean
lexical value and gets rejected by the NBB validator.
Cause of the issue:
QWeb templates translate static text nodes by default. The base
module ships a generic `msgid "false" -> msgstr "onwaar"` translation,
used elsewhere in the UI, which silently hijacks the literal
"false"/"true" and unit tokens ("iso4217:EUR", "pure") in the XBRL
data templates whenever the file is generated in Dutch.
Solution:
Add `t-translation="off"` on the `<met:bln1>` boolean facts and the
`<measure>` unit tokens in the 5 remaining XBRL templates,
so these fixed-vocabulary XBRL values are never subject to translation
opw-6395785
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#124945The Barcode app now correctly blocks a package from being scanned twice during deliveries, even when several packages are part of the same transfer. This prevents duplicate stock movements that could create incorrect negative inventory records after validation.
Original PR description
Steps to reproduce --- 1. Enable Packages and turn on "Move Entire Packages" on the delivery operation type. 2. Create a storable product P and add 2 units in different package in stock: 1 in…
Steps to reproduce --- 1. Enable Packages and turn on "Move Entire Packages" on the delivery operation type. 2. Create a storable product P and add 2 units in different package in stock: 1 in PACK001, 1 in PACK002 3. In the Barcode app > Operations > Delivery > New 4. Scan a first package PACK001, then a second different package PACK002 5. Scan the first package PACK001 again. Issue --- Re-scanning an already scanned package is meant to be rejected with a "This package is already scanned." warning, but the rejection stops working as soon as a second package is present in the transfer, so the package content gets added a second time and, once validated, the source quant goes negative (the package ends up holding a negative and a positive quant of the same product). Commit 23613c63947 added a canPackSomeLines flag that is set to true for every package line that is not the scanned one, so any other package in the transfer makes the alreadyDonePackId && !canPackSomeLines guard false and silently skips the warning. The scanned package already exposes whether it had something left to pack through scannedPackages, so gating the warning on that flag instead keeps the check working regardless of how many other packages are in the transfer. https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/3cc1a162e61662814b0e52c0c720831952d208a8/stock_barcode/static/src/models/barcode_picking_model.js#L1976-L2006 opw-6279105 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#121755
Resetting a submitted tax return no longer changes the global tax lock date for all users. This prevents closed accounting periods from being unintentionally reopened, while still allowing authorized lock date exceptions to control corrections and resubmissions.
Original PR description
To reproduce the issue: 1) Initialize a company in Belgium, create the tax returns 2) Submit the VAT return from January 3) Open the lock date wizard. The tax lock date is January 31st. 4) Add a lock…
To reproduce the issue:
1) Initialize a company in Belgium, create the tax returns 2) Submit the VAT return from January
3) Open the lock date wizard. The tax lock date is January 31st. 4) Add a lock date exception removing the tax lock date just for you, for 5 min. 5) Reset January's return
6) Reopen the lock date wizard.
====> Your exception is still there, but the tax lock date for everyone has been reset to December 31st.
This is plain wrong. Resetting a return should not automatically reopen the period for everyone. Lock dates exceptions/modifications are anyway required to reset the return ; they should pilot the whole flow. Nothing being magically hidden from the user means there can't be someone else mistakenly encoding something into the reopened period.
Another fix was required to make this one work: setting the tax lock date before submitting the return should work. In bigger environments, users might want to do that as a first step to reduce the number of people encoding data before actually doing the submission of the return. Therefore, the case where the tax lock date is already set at the date_to of the return when submitting it was supposed to be already supported, and allow the creation of the closing entry for that return, despite it being on the tax lock date. The test ensuring this was however badly written, and the feature didn't work: the closing was created at a later date than the lock date automatically, due to the Bills' Algorithm.
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#124872
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#124811