Thursday, August 6, 2026
2 changes · saas-18.3
Resolved issues and error corrections
Dutch SBR tax return exports now use the Tax Unit VAT number when a tax unit is selected, instead of incorrectly using the individual company's Omzetbelastingnummer. This helps prevent tax authority rejections for fiscal unity filings while keeping the company number behavior for single-company returns.
Original PR description
**Steps to reproduce:** * Install the **Netherlands - SBR** (`l10n_nl_reports_sbr`) and **Netherlands - SBR OB Nummer** (`l10n_nl_reports_sbr_ob_nummer`) modules. * Create two companies with Dutch…
**Steps to reproduce:** * Install the **Netherlands - SBR** (`l10n_nl_reports_sbr`) and **Netherlands - SBR OB Nummer** (`l10n_nl_reports_sbr_ob_nummer`) modules. * Create two companies with Dutch localization. * Go to **Accounting → Configuration → Tax Units** and create a Tax Unit with its own **Tax ID** (e.g. `NL826317558B01`), adding both companies. * On the main company form, fill in the **Omzetbelastingnummer** field (e.g. `123456782B90`). * Go to **Accounting → Reporting → Tax Return**, select the Tax Unit in the filter, and click **XBRL → Download XBRL File**. **Observed behavior:** * The `<xbrli:identifier>` in the exported XBRL file contains the company's **Omzetbelastingnummer** (`123456782B90`) instead of the Tax Unit's VAT (`826317558B01`). * The tax authority rejects the return because the identifier does not match the fiscal unity registration. **Cause:** * `_get_sbr_identifier()` in `l10n_nl_reports_sbr_ob_nummer` unconditionally returns `self.env.company.l10n_nl_reports_sbr_ob_nummer` before consulting the Tax Unit. * The `super()` call, which correctly routes to `tax_unit.vat` via `report.get_vat_for_export()`, is only reached when the company field is empty — so the Tax Unit's VAT is never used when a company OB-number is set. **Fix:** * When a Tax Unit is active in the report options, delegate immediately to `super()._get_sbr_identifier()`, which resolves `tax_unit.vat` through the existing `get_vat_for_export()` logic. * The company-level `l10n_nl_reports_sbr_ob_nummer` override is preserved as a fallback for the `company_only` (no Tax Unit) case. opw-6350840 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#126876 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#125167
Changing a payslip to a structure that does not use worked day lines now properly clears outdated worked day information. Belgian DMFA payroll reporting also continues to include the right remunerations for off-cycle payslips, improving payroll accuracy and compliance reporting.
Original PR description
hr_payroll: Previously, changing to a structure with `use_worked_day_lines = False` (e.g., 13th month) caused `valid_slips` to be empty and return early, leaving stale worked day lines on the payslip. This commit resets the worked_days_lines before filtering for valid payslips. l10n_be_hr_payroll: After fixing the payroll bug and clearing worked_days_lines correctly, the DMFA report fails to correctly consider remunerations since the off-cycle payslips do not have worked_days_lines anymore. This commit backports a fix from odoo/enterprise#106689 to not skip remunerations for payslips with no worked days lines. task-6401942 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#124986