Monday, August 17, 2026
6 changes · saas-19.1
Resolved issues and error corrections
Accounting users in Spanish companies can now export VAT record books even when the report includes Point of Sale transactions. The report securely reads the needed POS data internally, avoiding access errors without requiring extra POS permissions.
Original PR description
Steps to reproduce:
- With an ES Company
- Open a POS session, add product with tax and pay
- As a user with only accounting access
- Go to Accouting > Reporting > Tax report
- Select Generic Tax report
- Print "VAT record Books"
Issue:
An AccessError will raise
```
Access Error
You are not allowed to access 'Point of Sale Session' (pos.session) records.
This operation is allowed for the following groups:
- Point of Sale/User
Contact your administrator to request access if necessary.
```
Analysis:
Vat Record Books handler for POS needs to read pos.session and pos.order records. Currently, the action is performed with the rights of the user running the report, so accounting-only user face an error.
As POS records are only read internally to build the report, we add sudo call to get the data.
opw-5862529
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#126590
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#125980Odoo now recognizes five additional response codes introduced by Chile's tax authority for supplier electronic documents. This prevents affected supplier documents from getting stuck during processing and keeps the acceptance/claim workflow aligned with the latest SII rules.
Original PR description
**Before this PR:** After the implementation of Resolution 161 of November 13th 2025, SII responses included keys not supported by the current l10n_cl_edi implementation. This resulted in supplier DTEs not being processed as they were before the change, because the five new keys were not found in Odoo's current `l10n_cl_claim` field, causing that the documents with these responses, were kept in a loop not solved. **After this PR:** The five new values from the resolution, along with their translations, were added to the selector field, fixing the process flow. **SII Reference:** https://www.sii.cl/normativa_legislacion/resoluciones/2025/reso161.pdf (see Event Code, page 5) Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#121833
This fix prevents old, discarded timer views from continuing to update running task or ticket timers in the background. Users should no longer see timers jump, show negative values, or record incorrect elapsed time after stopping, restarting, and reloading a timed record.
Original PR description
A running task/ticket timer can sometimes stutter, show negative values, and track the wrong elapsed time. ### Steps to reproduce On a record with a timesheet timer (for example, a Field Service…
A running task/ticket timer can sometimes stutter, show negative values, and track the wrong elapsed time. ### Steps to reproduce On a record with a timesheet timer (for example, a Field Service task): 1. Start the timer and let it run for about 15-20 seconds. 2. Stop it and confirm the dialog. 3. Start it again. This creates a new `timer_start`. 4. Reload the page. The timer starts jumping every second between two different values. As it keeps running, it can even show negative values such as `00:00:-57`. If the problem does not appear right away, repeat steps 2-4 a few times. It usually shows up after a few stop/start/reload cycles. ### Cause The timer shown in the button bar is the `timer_start_field` widget. It starts a `setInterval` that updates a shared `TimerReactive` object once per second. While a form is loading, Odoo renders it several times in a row (for example: a first render, another when the chatter is loaded, and another when the record data comes back from the server). Rendering a form builds all of its fields to produce the display, so each of these renders creates its own `timer_start_field`. Odoo keeps and mounts only the render that ends up on screen; the earlier ones are thrown away before being mounted. The interval is started while the field renders, from the record observer set up in `setup`, before the field is mounted. So the fields that are later thrown away also start an interval. Those intervals keep running for the rest of the session. Each one updates the same shared `TimerReactive` object using the `timer_start` it was created with. As long as every instance has the same `timer_start`, they all write the same value and the problem stays hidden. After the timer is stopped and started again, the old instances keep the old `timer_start` while the mounted one uses the new one. Every second they overwrite each other's value, so the timer jumps between two different elapsed times. When the instance with the newer `timer_start` writes right after one with an older start, it tries to show a smaller elapsed time than what is already there, and the subtraction in `TimerReactive` produces a negative number of seconds. ### Fix Move the per-second timer update into a `useEffect`. The effect only runs after the field is mounted, and Owl automatically cleans it up when the field is unmounted or when `timer_start` or `timer_pause` change. This means fields that are destroyed before they are mounted never start an interval, so only the mounted field updates the shared timer. `onRecordChange` no longer starts or stops the interval. It only updates the displayed timer value to match the current record. opw-6209405 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#126242
Recurring products sold as one-time purchases are now treated as regular sales in stock forecasts. This prevents inventory planning from showing endless future demand for orders that are not subscriptions, improving replenishment accuracy.
Original PR description
When a recurring product (with `allow_one_time_sale = True`) is sold as a one-time purchase (no subscription plan), the stock forecast report and replenishment logic incorrectly treat it as an active…
When a recurring product (with `allow_one_time_sale = True`) is sold as a one-time purchase (no subscription plan), the stock forecast report and replenishment logic incorrectly treat it as an active subscription. This results in infinite projected future outgoing moves for standard sales. This occurs because the logic only checks if `recurring_invoice` is True on the product, ignoring whether the parent order actually has a `plan_id`. This commit fixes the issue by: 1. Updating `_get_stock_subscription_lines` in `sale.order.line` to filter out lines using `_subscription_is_one_time_sale()`. 2. Updating the domains in `stock.forecasted_product_product` to require `order_id.plan_id != False` for subscription forecasts, while correctly routing one-time sales (`order_id.plan_id == False`) back to the standard sale domain. 3. Adapting existing tests to verify that one-time sales do not generate future subscription stock forecasts. Task-6193648 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#116889
The IoT device list now opens device details using the standard navigation behavior, restoring pagination after it was previously broken. This helps users browse and manage larger sets of IoT devices without getting stuck or losing access to later pages.
Original PR description
Since #72351, the pagination on IoT devices was broken due to how we were getting to the full device form when clicking on a record. We now change the override to use the existing method from the framework `switchToForm` which handles it better. opw-6058532 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#126562 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#126486
Dutch Digipoort tax return status updates now continue even if one record is missing its related closing entry. This prevents a single incomplete record from blocking status processing for other tax returns.
Original PR description
The `l10n_nl_reports_sbr_status_info` contains the `l10n_nl_reports_sbr.status.service` class. The class is responsible for fetching the status of sent Digipoort tax returns. The status is then posted as a chatter message to the tax return's closing entry. Issues can arise when one of the status service records is, for whatever reason, missing a closing entry. In such case, the message cannot be posted, resulting in an exception being raised. Since the records are processed in a loop without a try-catch, this causes the whole action to fail. This can lead to one broken record effectively shutting down the whole module's functionality. This PR adds some if-else checks to gracefully handle the case where the closing entry is missing. Related tickets: opw-5901446 and opw-6410082 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#127844 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#125996