Monday, August 17, 2026
8 changes · saas-19.2
Enhancements to existing features
Timesheet Assistant suggestions for helpdesk tickets now show the actual ticket name and fill it into the timesheet form when selected. This makes time entry faster and avoids duplicate or incorrect assistant suggestions that could inflate calendar-based durations.
Original PR description
Before this commit, the Timesheet Assistant displayed static labels for Helpdesk Tickets. Furthermore, when a user clicked "Add" on a ticket suggestion, the Timesheet Inline Form did not auto-populate the ticket name, as the source ID was lost during the grouping phase. Task: 6320652
Resolved issues and error corrections
Starting a timesheet timer from a task linked to a sales order now correctly carries over the related billable sales item. This ensures the resulting timesheet is billed against the right customer order and shows the Billable option immediately.
Original PR description
**Problem:** Starting the timer on a task that is linked to a sale order item produces a timesheet that is not linked to it, and the Billable toggle is missing from the timer. **Steps to reproduce:**…
**Problem:** Starting the timer on a task that is linked to a sale order item produces a timesheet that is not linked to it, and the Billable toggle is missing from the timer. **Steps to reproduce:** 1. Install Timesheets and Sales 2. Open a task whose Sales Order Item is set 3. Start the timer from the Timesheets systray 4. Save it and open the resulting timesheet **Current behavior:** The Sales Order Item is empty. The Billable toggle only appears after removing and re-adding the task in the timer. **Expected behavior:** The timer is billable on the task's sale order item as soon as it is opened. **Cause of the issue:** `_get_timesheet_pre_filled_form_data` returns only `project_id` and `task_id`. The timer form merges that pre-fill over `timesheet_default_values`, which `lazy_session_info` computes once per session from `account.analytic.line.new()` - a record with no project and no task, so `so_line`, `allow_billable` and `has_available_so` are all `False` in it. Because the pre-fill carries none of those keys, they keep the task-independent session values: the timesheet stays unlinked from the sale order item, and the Billable toggle stays hidden since it is displayed from `has_available_so`. **Fix:** The pre-fill endpoint is the only place that knows which task the timer is being opened on, so it is where the task-dependent values have to be resolved. Reading them off a new timesheet built with that project and task keeps the endpoint generic - it returns whatever `_get_aw_timesheet_fields_specification` declares, so the sale fields stay owned by sale_timesheet_enterprise rather than being named in timesheet_grid. Dropping the session defaults instead was rejected: they are also the only source of `date`, `user_id` and `company_id` for the timer record, and removing them makes saving fail on the required Date field. opw-6423577
This fix improves how calendar event suggestions are matched to the right project or task when creating timesheets. It also corrects event duration calculations after overlapping calendar items are adjusted, helping users see more reliable suggested time entries.
Original PR description
task: 6435164
Fixes an issue where running task or ticket timers could jump between values, show negative seconds, or track incorrect elapsed time after repeated stop/start and page reload cycles. The timer now updates only from the active on-screen widget, improving reliability for users recording work time.
Original PR description
A running task/ticket timer can sometimes stutter, show negative values, and track the wrong elapsed time. ### Steps to reproduce On a record with a timesheet timer (for example, a Field Service…
A running task/ticket timer can sometimes stutter, show negative values, and track the wrong elapsed time. ### Steps to reproduce On a record with a timesheet timer (for example, a Field Service task): 1. Start the timer and let it run for about 15-20 seconds. 2. Stop it and confirm the dialog. 3. Start it again. This creates a new `timer_start`. 4. Reload the page. The timer starts jumping every second between two different values. As it keeps running, it can even show negative values such as `00:00:-57`. If the problem does not appear right away, repeat steps 2-4 a few times. It usually shows up after a few stop/start/reload cycles. ### Cause The timer shown in the button bar is the `timer_start_field` widget. It starts a `setInterval` that updates a shared `TimerReactive` object once per second. While a form is loading, Odoo renders it several times in a row (for example: a first render, another when the chatter is loaded, and another when the record data comes back from the server). Rendering a form builds all of its fields to produce the display, so each of these renders creates its own `timer_start_field`. Odoo keeps and mounts only the render that ends up on screen; the earlier ones are thrown away before being mounted. The interval is started while the field renders, from the record observer set up in `setup`, before the field is mounted. So the fields that are later thrown away also start an interval. Those intervals keep running for the rest of the session. Each one updates the same shared `TimerReactive` object using the `timer_start` it was created with. As long as every instance has the same `timer_start`, they all write the same value and the problem stays hidden. After the timer is stopped and started again, the old instances keep the old `timer_start` while the mounted one uses the new one. Every second they overwrite each other's value, so the timer jumps between two different elapsed times. When the instance with the newer `timer_start` writes right after one with an older start, it tries to show a smaller elapsed time than what is already there, and the subtraction in `TimerReactive` produces a negative number of seconds. ### Fix Move the per-second timer update into a `useEffect`. The effect only runs after the field is mounted, and Owl automatically cleans it up when the field is unmounted or when `timer_start` or `timer_pause` change. This means fields that are destroyed before they are mounted never start an interval, so only the mounted field updates the shared timer. `onRecordChange` no longer starts or stops the interval. It only updates the displayed timer value to match the current record. opw-6209405 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#126242
Luxembourg payroll calculations now use the wage index that was active at the end date of each payslip, rather than the current index. This helps ensure historical payslips are recalculated accurately and prevents incorrect salary amounts for past periods.
Original PR description
Historical payslips incorrectly used today's wage index instead of the index active during the payslip period. Now, salary rules evaluate the indexed wage using `payslip.date_to` via the new `_get_l10n_lu_indexed_wage(date)` contract method. Task: 6395557 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#125861
Confirmed manufacturing orders now correctly update when related bill of materials operations are changed or removed. This helps production teams avoid outdated work steps and keeps manufacturing instructions aligned with the latest product setup.
Original PR description
Steps to reproduce: - Create a product with a bom and 2 operations - Create an MO for 1 unit of that product - Confirm the MO - On the bom, delete the second operation and modify the first operation…
Steps to reproduce: - Create a product with a bom and 2 operations - Create an MO for 1 unit of that product - Confirm the MO - On the bom, delete the second operation and modify the first operation on anything else than the company, name or workcenter - Go back to the MO, click the "Update Bom" button > The second operation is not unlinked and the first operation is not updated Cause of the issue: The `action_update_bom` updates the move raws and operations of the MO via the `_link_bom`: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/f66614193cce18f5a3298d03ce7e5f29d54f07e9/addons/mrp/models/mrp_production.py#L1214-L1218 For draft MO's all the work of these updates is done via the compute methods and by deleting all the records unrelevant to the new bom: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/f66614193cce18f5a3298d03ce7e5f29d54f07e9/addons/mrp/models/mrp_production.py#L2603-L2626 And, in that case all the workorders that are not linked to an operation of the bom are expected to be deleted. However, when the MO is not in draft, the update of operations is expected to be performed here: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/f66614193cce18f5a3298d03ce7e5f29d54f07e9/addons/mrp/models/mrp_production.py#L2647-L2664 However, since the operation of the bom has been deleted, the workorder that is expected to be deleted is not linked to any operation and hence does not satisfy the condition to be deleted: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/f66614193cce18f5a3298d03ce7e5f29d54f07e9/addons/mrp/models/mrp_production.py#L2663-L2664 Concerning the non update of operations, it happens because the MO's operation are only updated on the three fields: `company_id`, `workcenter_id`, `name`: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/31df5033e31c193b4576ef37dfbc5fc683817bc5/addons/mrp/models/mrp_production.py#L2647-L2664 https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/31df5033e31c193b4576ef37dfbc5fc683817bc5/addons/mrp/models/mrp_production.py#L2628-L2629 However, many other cahnges can and are actually relevant. Note: Prior to commit 80e6ed658fb43584bc2fad673ca40d9af6cf0ab6 operations were archived on boms rather than deleted: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/4a5270218fe6fd7d30edb6d684b3340dc7423bab/addons/mrp/views/mrp_routing_views.xml#L53-L55 As such they would still be linked to an operation (but unrelated to the present values of the bom) and hence would fall into the condition of being unlinked from the MO. Since the bom operations are no longer archived there is no way to determine if an operation used to be linked to a bom and we therefore need to chose between deleting all operations unrelated to the present bom or to keep them all (when the MO has been confirmed). Community: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/269747 opw-6285878 opw-6261738 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#122746 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#120709
Odoo now recognizes valid Brazilian NF-e invoice XML files even when the main invoice tag has no attributes. This prevents valid vendor bills from being silently skipped during import, helping accounting teams process supplier invoices more consistently.
Original PR description
### Issue before this commit: Certain valid Brazilian NF-e (electronic invoice) XML files fail to import because the system silently ignores them during the initial EDI recognition phase. ### Steps to reproduce the issue: 1. Download Accounting and l10n_br_edi 2. Go to Vendor > Bills 3. Try to import both xmls in the ticket 4. One of the two will not be imported correctly ### Cause of the issue: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/3ed1721b702555e96c9774969927f6517e855704/l10n_br_edi/models/account_move.py#L819-L827 This function relies on a strict byte string search for b"<NFe " while it's also correct if the tag is only `<NFe>`. ### Reason to introduce the fix: To make the initial NF-e file recognition more robust and compliant with standard XML namespace rules, ensuring Odoo successfully processes all valid Brazilian invoices regardless of attribute formatting. opw-6402843 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#127851 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#126881
The Dutch tax reporting status check now continues even when a tax return record is missing its closing entry. This prevents one incomplete or broken record from blocking status updates for all Digipoort tax returns.
Original PR description
The `l10n_nl_reports_sbr_status_info` contains the `l10n_nl_reports_sbr.status.service` class. The class is responsible for fetching the status of sent Digipoort tax returns. The status is then posted as a chatter message to the tax return's closing entry. Issues can arise when one of the status service records is, for whatever reason, missing a closing entry. In such case, the message cannot be posted, resulting in an exception being raised. Since the records are processed in a loop without a try-catch, this causes the whole action to fail. This can lead to one broken record effectively shutting down the whole module's functionality. This PR adds some if-else checks to gracefully handle the case where the closing entry is missing. Related tickets: opw-5901446 and opw-6410082 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#127844 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#125996