Monday, August 24, 2026
12 changes · saas-18.4
Enhancements to existing features
Manufacturing planning now finds available workcenter time slots much faster when calendars are heavily booked. This reduces delays and system load during production scheduling, especially for very short work orders.
Original PR description
### Description of the issue/feature this PR addresses: The workcenter planning logic in _get_first_available_slot can become inefficient when searching for very short available slots. The method…
### Description of the issue/feature this PR addresses: The workcenter planning logic in _get_first_available_slot can become inefficient when searching for very short available slots. The method repeatedly builds small candidate time windows and checks them against existing workorder and leave intervals, potentially iterating many times before finding a free slot. This leads to unnecessary computational overhead in scenarios where a large number of busy intervals exist and the remaining duration to schedule is small. ### Current behavior before PR: The planner checks for conflicts by computing the intersection between the candidate window and the busy intervals. When a conflict is detected, the candidate window is shifted forward (or backward) to the end (or start) of the intersection, and the process is repeated until a free slot is found. This approach requires repeatedly performing full interval merge operations, which becomes disproportionately expensive when the candidate windows are very small and the loop iterates many times. ### Desired behavior after PR is merged: The planner uses a new Intervals.conflicting() helper to retrieve the entire busy interval that overlaps with the candidate window. Instead of advancing only to the end of the intersection slice, the planner can jump directly to the end (or start) of the full busy interval. This avoids repeated full-merge work, reduces the number of iterations needed to find a valid slot, and prevents pathological performance slowdowns in short-duration planning scenarios. ### Benchmarks Profiling _get_first_available_slot with different workorder durations. Database has multiple months that are fully booked. Speedup is more dramatic with shorter durations but there is at minimum minor improvements across the board. | Work Order Duration | Before | After | | --- |---|---| | 1sec | ~2.5min | <1sec | | 1min | ~2sec | <1sec | ### References opw-5437256 --- I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#269688 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#246015
Resolved issues and error corrections
Project profitability reports now include the cost of goods sold for delivered products when Anglo-Saxon and analytic accounting are enabled. This gives users a more accurate view of project profitability instead of hiding costs that previously cancelled each other out.
Original PR description
**Problem:** Since this PR https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/261798, both cogs lines have an analytic account, which causes the cogs to not appear on the project profitability report because cogs…
**Problem:** Since this PR https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/261798, both cogs lines have an analytic account, which causes the cogs to not appear on the project profitability report because cogs lines balance each other **Steps to reproduce:** - enable 'anglo saxon accounting' and 'analytic accounting' settings - create a storable product with automated std category, a cost of 10 and on hand quantity - create a service product and set the 'create on order' field to 'project' - confirm a SO for 1 unit of the product and 1 unit of the service - validate the delivery and create and confirm invoice - from the sale order, click on the project smart button - from the project click on the dashboard smart button **Current behavior:** the cogs section don't appear in the profitability report **Expected behavior:** it should appear with a line with a value of -10 **Cause of the issue:** since this PR https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/261798, both cogs line are linked to the analytic account. That's the expected behaviour but in the case of the project profitability reports, it prevents the user the see the cost of the product in the cogs section. That's because, inside the _get_revenues_items_from_invoices() method, bot cogs_line are added to the cogs_line list. https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/141cb292dc5e456161119e19f7a91665feaa0198/addons/sale_project/models/project_project.py#L699-L700 So when computing the amount_to_invoice for the costs ml_type, the balance of the lines will zero out each other and amount_to_invoice will be 0. https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/141cb292dc5e456161119e19f7a91665feaa0198/addons/sale_project/models/project_project.py#L703-L716 As a consequence, the cost of goods sold section won't be created https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/141cb292dc5e456161119e19f7a91665feaa0198/addons/sale_project/models/project_project.py#L718-L719 **fix:** only the line with an account of internal type 'expense' reflects the actual cost of the product sold in the context of the project. So when computing the profitability report that's the only line we should consider **test:** test_report_invoice_items_anglo_saxon_automatic_valuation checks that the cogs section is well displayed in the project profitability report. In the PR (mentionned above) which sets the analytic account on the stock cogs line, lines were added in the test to manually remove the analytic account on the stock cogs line to make the test pass. With the fix of this PR we can remove those additional lines in the test and it will check our use case well again. opw-6412409 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#283144
The point of sale now shows the true free stock quantity for product variants, accounting for items already reserved by sales orders. This prevents staff from seeing stock as available in the variant popup when it has already been committed elsewhere.
Original PR description
## Steps to reproduce: - Create another warehouse - Create a product with a variant, like Color, values black and white - Track the product, add a qty on hand of 50 on the black product - Go to the sales app, make a quotation of 50 for the black product - Confirm the quotation - Go to the PoS, click on the product, check the available qty in the popup - It is still 50, even though the forecasted is correct at 0 ## Why the fix: Having the actual free qty was added in this commit 682bc82 to be able to check the qty that was really free instead of the available qty. This means that we subtract the reserved_qty from the qty_available to get the free_qty. The variant popup was forgotten in this commit, so it was still displaying the qty_available. This is why there was a difference in the qty if we press the product normally or if we long press it, because the variant popup was forgotten in said commit. opw-6382845 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#280330
Inventory forecasts now correctly account for stock transfers recorded with zero demand. This prevents past forecasted quantities from being incorrectly reduced, helping businesses keep more reliable inventory history and planning data.
Original PR description
**Problem:** When creating a transfer that moves out a product with zero demand quantity, it will change the forecasted quantity of that product in the past. **Cause:** The query filtered out the stock move with zero demand quantity, which preventing the system from accounting for unplanned physical transfers when retroactively calculating past inventory balances **Steps to reproduce the issue:** 1. Create a stock picking with 0 demand quantity that moves a product from an internal location to a virtual location or production location. 2. The forecasted quantity of the product becomes negative in the past. **Fix:** Add another check in the query to include stock moves with zero demand quantity. **Notes:** Since the forecast report is made from a SQL view, this will require a -u to update the report. opw-6462883 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#283577
This fixes incorrect Hungarian tax configuration data used by accounting and electronic invoicing. It helps ensure Hungarian tax records and related EDI flows use the right setup, reducing the risk of reporting or invoice processing errors.
Original PR description
Adjusting incorrect tax configuration elements for Hungary. task-6397915 --- I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#283617 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#282697
This fixes an issue where pressing Shift+Enter in Safari created a full paragraph break instead of a simple line break in the editor. Users editing Knowledge articles on Mac Safari can now format text more predictably without unintended spacing changes.
Original PR description
**Steps to reproduce:** - Use a Mac with Safari - Install Knowledge app - Go to any article - Press Shift+Enter to try to enter a soft line break - Hard split is done instead **Issue:** Shift+Enter causes a `insertParagraph` event instead of `insertLineBreak` in Safari, which triggers the `SplitPlugin` instead of the `LineBreakPlugin`. **Fix:** Check if the browser is Safari and call `insertLineBreak` from the `SplitPlugin` (when needed) by listening to the "keydown" events. (note: I was not able to find any other key combination to properly trigger the `insertLineBreak` event in Safari) opw-6413507 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#281458
Self-billing invoices received through Peppol can again be imported into the dedicated self-billing sales journal. The fix also avoids an error screen for databases where the self-billing add-on is not installed, making the import flow more reliable for affected users.
Original PR description
This PR https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/277239 has been merged before being rebased on https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/259935/changes/568e3e1d4f100e22bd5e724a6afa6d0437f56830 This commit restores the possibility of importing a self-billing invoice into a dedicated self-billing sale journal, and prevents a traceback from being shown in case the user's DB has no `account_peppol_selfbilling` module installed (which is auto-installed with `account_peppol` by default, but we got a feedback of a user having this issue). task-no feedback : https://www.odoo.com/odoo/project/49/tasks/6481452 --- I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#283930 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#283581
The translation button now saves edits made inside related-record dialogs before opening translations. This ensures business users translate the current text they just entered, rather than old or empty content, while preserving existing behavior in editable lists.
Original PR description
Clicking the translate button saves the form's root record before opening the translation dialog, since https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/9da52919a03dbcee5209430918195158c0652099. A record opened…
Clicking the translate button saves the form's root record before opening the translation dialog, since https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/9da52919a03dbcee5209430918195158c0652099. A record opened in an x2many form dialog keeps its changes for itself until the dialog is saved, see https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/242f6d3cf7288853f163ac6986a3b7aa4279efaf/addons/web/static/src/model/relational_model/static_list.js#L193. Its pending changes are not part of the root record changes, so saving the root sends nothing to the server, and the translation dialog then shows the stored terms instead of the current content, or no terms at all when the stored value is empty. The fix changes openTranslationDialog in translation_button.js, the place that decides which record to save. When the record keeps its changes for itself (record._noUpdateParent), the record is saved directly, like the button did before the commit above. The root record is still saved in the other cases, so the editable list case that commit fixed keeps working. Steps to reproduce: 1. Activate a second language in Settings > Translations > Languages 2. Open the Surveys app, open a survey and click a question in the Questions tab 3. In the Description tab, change the description 4. Click the EN button on the description field => the translation dialog shows the terms of the previous description, not the current one Ticket [link](https://www.odoo.com/odoo/project.task/6237291) opw-6237291 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#269507
Sales users limited to their own documents can now cancel sales orders that include loyalty program points without hitting an access error. The fix ensures temporary loyalty point records are cleaned up correctly during cancellation, reducing operational blockers for sales teams.
Original PR description
Steps to produce: --- - Install `sale_management` and `sale_loyalty` module without demo. - From sales > products > discounts & loyalty, create new loyalty card program and save. - Now create new…
Steps to produce: --- - Install `sale_management` and `sale_loyalty` module without demo. - From sales > products > discounts & loyalty, create new loyalty card program and save. - Now create new product of 100$. - Create a user which have sales rights as `user: own documents only`. - With that user, create new sale order with product and confirm. - Try to cancel the order. Issue: --- - It shows the access error: ```py You are not allowed to delete 'Sale Order Coupon Points - Keeps track of how a sale order impacts a coupon' (sale.order.coupon.points) records. This operation is allowed for the following groups: - Sales/Administrator Contact your administrator to request access if necessary. ``` Root cause: --- - Users with the `Sales: Own Documents Only` access right only have read permissions ([1]). When they cancel a Sales Order, the `_action_cancel` method attempts to clean up the temporary pending points allocated to the order by calling `self.coupon_point_ids.unlink()`. Because this call is executed without elevated privileges, the system blocks the deletion and raises an Access Error Solution: --- - Added `.sudo()` to the `unlink()` call for `coupon_point_ids` in the `_action_cancel` method. This ensures the pending point records are cleaned up with the necessary elevated privileges. [1]https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/23af2b443735c6d3a2f64e44f9ea5da45638b052/addons/sale_loyalty/security/ir.model.access.csv#L16 opw-6453016 --- I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#283535 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#281477
French companies using Peppol-related electronic invoicing now keep their required incoming invoice journal when settings are opened. Incoming documents are routed as vendor bills instead of being incorrectly stored in the Documents app when document reception is not allowed.
Original PR description
Peppol documents can be received in a journal or in the Documents app (peppol_reception_mode). Some companies cannot use Documents: _peppol_allows_document_reception() returns False and the journal…
Peppol documents can be received in a journal or in the Documents app (peppol_reception_mode). Some companies cannot use Documents: _peppol_allows_document_reception() returns False and the journal stays required. This is the case of French companies (via l10n_fr_pdp). The onchange of the settings and the import did not check this method. So on a French company with the mode set to 'documents': - the Settings cleared the journal on each opening, while it was still required - the incoming documents were saved in Documents instead of vendor bills Steps to reproduce: - Create a Belgian company, with a purchase journal, and register it on Peppol as receiver - Set the reception mode to "Receive in Documents" - Change the fiscal position to France, and install l10n_fr_pdp, the Peppol part is replaced by "French Electronic Invoicing", so the radio button is not visible anymore, but the company still has peppol_reception_mode == 'documents'. - Open the Settings again: the field "Incoming Invoices Journal" is empty. opw-6429691 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#126462
This fixes an issue that prevented users from entering and comparing budgets on the Moroccan profit and loss report. The report now uses the correct balance figures for budget comparison, so budget amounts remain visible and meaningful in multi-column reporting.
Original PR description
Before this commit, it was impossible to use budget on the Moroccan P&L, for the following reasons: - The feature was designed for one-column reports. MA's P&L uses 3, one of which is the total of…
Before this commit, it was impossible to use budget on the Moroccan P&L, for the following reasons:
- The feature was designed for one-column reports. MA's P&L uses 3, one of which is the total of the two others.
=> We remove that requirement, and make sure to always select the 'balance' column as the reference for the budget comparison.
- When trying to input a budget amount in the report, the amount disappeared entirely.
=> This was because the total column of report was not using 'balance' as its expression label. We fix that by rewriting the expression labels of that report.
The fact we hardcode the use of 'balance' is arguable. It is however not possible here to rely on some custom handler to change a specific option key that would be used to generate the budget comparison data, since some of those data need to be generated in the get_options, before _custom_options_initializer even gets called. This is the simplest approach, and this case is rare enough for us to deem it acceptable.
opw-6385229
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#128816
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#128266This fix restores delegation support in Studio approvals so approval responsibilities can be reassigned as intended. It helps teams keep approval workflows moving when the original approver is unavailable or needs to delegate tasks.
Original PR description
opw-6321766 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#122441