Steps to reproduce:
- Argentinean company, Responsable Inscripto (l10n_ar_pos installed)
- A posted customer invoice with VAT, partially paid
- In the PoS, pick the customer, "Settle invoices", select that invoice, pay the balance by bank transfer and validate

Issue:
Validation fails with "There should be a single tax from the "VAT" tax group per line, but this is not the case for line ..." and the settlement cannot be recorded at all. The invoice being settled is correct; the rejected line belongs to a second invoice the PoS creates for the settlement itself.

Cause:
`setToInvoice` already refuses to invoice a settlement, but its condition, `is_settling_account and no line`, only describes a deposit: the deposit line is added at validation. When settling a due or an invoice, `is_settling_account` stays false and the order does carry lines - the settle lines - so the guard never fires. l10n_ar_pos then sets `to_invoice` on mount, as a sale must generate an electronic document in AR, and the settle line, untaxed on purpose since it pays an existing document rather than selling anything, reaches `_check_argentinean_invoice_taxes`.

Fix:
Refuse the flag as well when every line is a settle line. Such an order generates an empty document - all its lines, the receivable one included, have a zero balance - so it records nothing and only consumes a document number, which in AR means an AFIP number for a zero-amount invoice. An order that also sells something keeps its invoice, since the sale still has to be reported. Reconciliation is unaffected: it happens in `_reconcile_account_move_lines` at session close, and is already covered for both invoiced and non-invoiced settlement orders.

opw-6464675

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#128975

Steps to reproduce:
- Create a pricelist with a rule applied on a product category and make it available in the PoS
- Open a PoS session
- From the backend, create a product in a new category covered by such a rule
- Back in the PoS, find that product through Search > Search more and add it to the order

Issue:
The product is priced at its sale price, the pricelist rule set on its category is ignored.

Cause:
A product that is not part of the initial payload is loaded on the fly by load_product_from_pos, which sends back the rules returned by get_pos_ui_product_pricelist_item_by_product. That domain only matches the rules set on the template or on the variant, never the ones set on a product category, and the payload carries no product.category record either. The client therefore has neither the rule nor the category: parentCategories walks categ_id, which resolves to nothing, so getCategoryRulesIds returns no rule and getPrice falls back to the sale price.

This stayed unnoticed because product.category is fully loaded when the session starts, along with every category rule, so only the categories created after the session was opened are missing.

Fix:
Send the categories of the loaded products, since a rule set on a parent category applies to its children - along with the products, and match the rules set on those categories in get_pos_ui_product_pricelist_item_by_product.

The initial loading domain of product.pricelist.item no longer filters the category rules on the loaded categories: such a rule has to be loaded whatever the products sent to the client are, since a product of that category may be loaded later on.

opw-6477745

---
I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#285411
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#284660

**Description of the issue/feature this PR addresses:**

When importing a SODA XML file, users without the Analytic Accounting
group encounter an access rights error even if Analytic Accounting is not
enabled.

This occurs because the import wizard reads the `analytic_account_id` field
on the `soda.analytic.mapping` model to build an internal dictionary of
departments. Because this field is restricted to the Analytic Accounting
group, the evaluation of this field crashes the import for users even when
the Analytic Accounting feature is disabled.

This commit resolves the issue by using `.sudo()` on the analytic mapping
recordset to bypass the field-level group restriction.

**Steps to reproduce:**

- Log in as Mitchell Admin, change company to “My Belgian Company”
- Settings > Users & Companies > Users > Mitchell Admin > Access Rights > Extra Rights > ensure “Analytic Accounting” is unchecked
   - Also ensure Mitchell Admin is not part of the “Analytic Accounting” group
- Accounting Dashboard > remove “Favorites” from filter > drag & drop a SODA XML file to “Miscellaneous Operations” > save > observe Access Error


**Current behavior before PR:**

- Users who don't belong to the Analytic Accounting group encounter an access error when attempting to import SODA XML files, even when the Analytic Accounting feature isn't enabled

**Desired behavior after PR is merged:**

- Those users no longer receive an access error

opw-6376039

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#127867

Steps to reproduce:
- Enable presets on a restaurant PoS and tick "Amount of Guests" on the preset used for tables
- On device A, open a table and enter the number of guests
- On device B, open the same table

Issue:
Device B pops the guest count numpad again, even though the guest count was already entered on device A.

Cause:
ensureGuestCustomerCount guarded the popup on order.uiState.guestSetted. uiState is only serialized to IndexedDB (SERIALIZED_UI_STATE_PROP, used by serializeForIndexedDB); it is never sent to the server, so the flag is local to one browser and a second device always considers the guest count as not yet asked.

customer_count is synced and could carry that information, but PosStore createNewOrder pre-filled it with the table seats, so it was never 0 for a table order and could not tell "not asked" from "answered".

Fix:
Stop storing the seats default on the record and expose it from getCustomerCount() instead, so customer_count == 0 means "no guest count entered yet". ensureGuestCustomerCount now guards on that synced value, so an order whose guest count was entered on another device is not asked for it again. Every display goes through getCustomerCount(), so the values shown on the Guests button, the receipt and the preparation ticket are unchanged.

opw-6470180

---
I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#285094
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#283002

Changing a project's visibility fails when its documents folder contains a shortcut.
The visibility change is never applied and the following error is raised:
"You can not update the access of a shortcut, update its target instead."

### Reproduction steps

- Create a project and add a document to its folder.
- Create another document outside the project's folder.
- Create a shortcut to that document in the project's folder.
- Change the project's visibility.

### Cause

Changing a project's visibility updates the access rights of its folder and documents together.

The shortcut access check is meant to reject operations performed only on shortcuts. However, reading `shortcut_document_id` on a recordset returns the shortcut targets found across that recordset. Therefore, the presence of a single shortcut makes the check reject the whole operation.

This prevents regular documents and the project folder from having their access updated.

### Fix

Only reject access updates when all records involved are shortcuts.

This preserves the protection against changing shortcut access directly while allowing project access updates to include shortcuts alongside regular documents and folders.

opw-6472637

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#129588
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#128756

## Steps to reproduce:
	- Install Planning and Employee
	- Create a working schedule for example 38h/week (8h,8h,8h,8h,6h)
	- Create two employees and assign the created working schedule to them
	- Create a shift in planning for the two employees for a week
	- Notice in gantt view the total allocated hours for each day are not calculated correctly

## Cause:
When calculating each cell's duration we fetch the resources' intervals while doing this here https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/1851d3046682020686f517dec3c744d88a38b049/planning/static/src/views/planning_gantt/planning_gantt_renderer.js#L354-L359 we loop over the first interval and instead of pushing to the intervals we overwrite on the whole list with the interval we fetched so when it comes to the next interval it won't find any intersection so it will set the resourceIntervals to an empty array. So here https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/1851d3046682020686f517dec3c744d88a38b049/planning/static/src/views/planning_gantt/planning_gantt_renderer.js#L231-L234 it will mess up the percentage calculation which will lead to wrong allocated hours numbers.

## Fix:
Instead of overwriting on resourceIntervals we push to it the intervals returned to keep the intervals for each resource.

opw-6316368

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#123750

*=helpdesk_planning_field_service{,_sale_timesheet}

Steps to reproduce:
-------------------------
1. Install helpdesk_planning_field_service_sale_timesheet with demo data.
2. Open a helpdesk team (e.g., Customer Care) and enable field service planning.
3. Create a new ticket in Customer Care, plan two interventions, and mark them as completed.
4. Click the cog menu of the helpdesk ticket and click Preview.
5. In preview mode, click **Field Service** in the left sidebar.

Issue:
---------
A traceback occurs:
```python
File "/home/odoo/odoo/community/odoo/addons/base/models/ir_qweb.py", line 875, in _render_iterall
    raise QWebError(qweb_error_info) from error
odoo.addons.base.models.ir_qweb.QWebError: Error while rendering the template:
    KeyError: 'format_datetime'
    Template: planning_field_service.portal_my_field_service_report_list
    Reference: 866
    Path: /t/t/t[3]/t/tbody/t/tr/td[1]/a/t
    Element: <t t-out="format_datetime(intervention.start_datetime, dt_format='MMM d, YYYY')"/>
```

Cause:
---------
https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/28637781cd3ffc4c3dc0c2016dd5d6051793f641/helpdesk_planning_field_service/controllers/portal.py#L59-L63
After this 6857d1a, date formatting was changed to use `format_datetime`, and [planning_field_service](https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/28637781cd3ffc4c3dc0c2016dd5d6051793f641/planning_field_service/controllers/portal.py#L42) was updated accordingly. However, `helpdesk_planning_field_service` was not updated to pass `format_datetime` in the template values, causing a **KeyError** when opening the field service intervention list.

Solution:
-----------
Pass `format_datetime` in the template values, following the same approach used in `planning_field_service`.

opw-6467400

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#128519

When printing an invoice, a traceback will occur if the company's partner has an invalid CUIT.

Steps to reproduce the error:
- Install ``l10n_ar_edi`` module with demo data
- Switch to ``(AR) Exento`` Company
- Go to Invoicing > Configuration > Journals > Open ``Ventas Preimpreso`` journal >
  ARCA POS System: ``Electronic Invoice - Web Service`` > Save
- Create a new invoice with ``ADHOC SA`` partner > Confirm the invoice
- Open the ``(AR) Exento`` partner and set the VAT to ``BE0477472701``
- Open the Invoice > print

Traceback:
```py
ValueError: invalid literal for int() with base 10: 'BE0477472701'
```

After this [commit], companies outside the EU can use European VAT numbers.
Consequently, an Argentine partner can have a CUIT number such as ``BE0477472701``,
which is valid as a Belgian VAT number but not as a CUIT.
When printing the invoice, the ``l10n_ar_vat`` field is computed
from the partner's VAT and its value is passed to ``int()``,
causing a traceback at the following line:
https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/d55486866d09f8aa87c2003dab722cfa323068b4/l10n_ar_edi/models/account_move.py#L138

[commit]: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/a2afe3292e1cd0a4f339dc47707e469653d13ea0

Enterprise PR: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/pull/127820

sentry-7666042143

---
I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#284880
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#282454

When printing an invoice, a traceback will occur if the company's partner has an invalid CUIT.

Steps to reproduce the error:
- Install ``l10n_ar_edi`` module with demo data
- Switch to ``(AR) Exento`` Company
- Go to Invoicing > Configuration > Journals > Open ``Ventas Preimpreso`` journal >
  ARCA POS System: ``Electronic Invoice - Web Service`` > Save
- Create a new invoice with ``ADHOC SA`` partner > Confirm the invoice
- Open the ``(AR) Exento`` partner and set the VAT to ``BE0477472701``
- Open the Invoice > print

Traceback:
```py
ValueError: invalid literal for int() with base 10: 'BE0477472701'
```

The issue occurs because when the partner's identification type is CUIT,
At [1] ``_run_check_identification()`` method does not include partners whose identification type has ``is_vat=True``.
As a result, CUIT is not validated by ``_run_check_identification()`` method in ``l10n_ar`` module at [2].
So, partner's ``l10n_ar_vat`` field can be computed as ``BE0477472701``.
Passing this value to ``int()`` raises the traceback during invoice printing at below line.
https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/d55486866d09f8aa87c2003dab722cfa323068b4/l10n_ar_edi/models/account_move.py#L138

[1]:https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/c2a39085ba0fbcf8a0e6a55228191e764499caea/addons/l10n_latam_base/models/res_partner.py#L24-L30

[2]:https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/c2a39085ba0fbcf8a0e6a55228191e764499caea/addons/l10n_ar/models/res_partner.py#L55-L65

Community PR: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/282454

sentry-7666042143

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#129449
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#127820

Steps to produce:
---
- Install website_sale module without demo.
- Create a new product and publish it.
- From the incognito, go to shop and add that product to cart.
- While doing checkout > fill the address form.
- Add the all details including the company name and valid VAT.
  (ex. BE0477472701)
- Submit the form.

Issue:
---
- When a public or guest user submits a new address with both a contact name
  and a company name along with a valid VAT number, the contact's name was
  being overwritten with the company name.

Root cause:
---
- The _compute_is_company heuristic in res.partner automatically sets
  is_company=True for partners with valid VAT. In [commit]
  `_create_or_update_address`, the condition `elif partner_sudo.is_company:`
  was designed to rename existing companies, but incorrectly caught newly
  created individuals marked as companies due to VAT, causing their name to be
  overwritten instead of creating a parent company.

Solution:
---
- Replaced the is_company check with explicit conditions: the partner
  has no parent_id, has contact-type child_ids.
- This ensures the rename-company branch only fires for actual company
  heads that the logged-in user belongs to, not for individuals that
  happen to have is_company=True due to a valid VAT.

[commit]: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/8f3a32170c842f5f42edc79bf8620276f0da7be4

opw-6356772
---
I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#285495
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#275044

Steps to reproduce:
- Post a Peruvian invoice so it is sent to SUNAT (directly or through Estela/Digiflow).
- SUNAT's sendBill call hangs and Odoo's request times out (ReadTimeout / ConnectionError), even though SUNAT actually finishes registering the document on its side a moment later.
- Odoo retries sending the same invoice (either automatically through the EDI cron, or manually). SUNAT now replies with a "document already exists" SOAP fault (code 1033/4000), since it processed the previous attempt.
- Odoo tries to recover from this by fetching the CDR through getStatusCdr, but SUNAT has not finished generating it yet, so the lookup also fails.

Cause of the issue:
_l10n_pe_edi_post_invoice_web_service() already has recovery logic for error codes 1033/4000: it calls _l10n_pe_edi_retrieve_cdr() to fetch the CDR and treat the invoice as sent. But when that lookup itself fails (CDR not generated yet), the resulting error keeps the 'blocking_level' set to 'error' from the original SOAP fault. Documents with blocking_level 'error' are excluded from the automatic EDI cron retries (see account.edi.document._cron_process_documents_web_services), so the invoice gets stuck needing a manual retry, which can lose the same race against SUNAT again and again.

Solution:
When the CDR can't be retrieved yet after a 1033/4000 duplicate error, mark the result as 'blocking_level': 'warning' instead of leaving it at 'error'. This keeps the invoice eligible for the automatic EDI cron retries, so Odoo keeps polling SUNAT until the CDR becomes available, instead of requiring manual intervention every time this race is lost.

opw-6393231

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#127484
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#125053