Restores the sale_project_stock_account module removed by 37b615f14305
("[REM] sale_, project_stock_account: remove dead code"), which excludes
re-invoiced products from the analytic lines generated by stock moves
when anglo-saxon accounting is enabled, together with the test covering
it and the project_stock_account filter it extends.

That removal was justified by _account_analytic_entry_move() no longer
existing, concluding that analytic lines are not created from stock
moves anymore. That was true at the time: 08b62a4bbcc6 had dropped the
method along with the override of project_stock_account that filtered
the moves, and skipped the test guarding it in the same commit, so
removing the module turned nothing red. 1d510f2c2e05 then reintroduced
the analytic lines under _create_analytic_move, which is called whenever
moves are done, leaving the module wrongly missing.

_get_valid_moves_domain is restored on the new method, and with it the
exclusion of the re-invoiced products, whose cost is already carried by
the customer invoice under anglo-saxon accounting. 9a614c91ad7d has
since given project_stock_account a _create_analytic_move override that
skips the moves whose operation type has analytic costs disabled; the
restored filter is merged into that override instead of being added
beside it, and _get_valid_moves_domain keeps only the project condition,
the analytic-costs one now being applied to every move.

The exclusion is now decided per move, on the company of the move
itself: the removed code read the flag on the company of the user
processing the delivery, which ignores the company the delivery belongs
to. As the domain is evaluated for each move, the condition moves into
it instead of gating its construction.

TestAnalytics is un-skipped, as TestAnalyticsReinvoice extends it and
would otherwise inherit its skip. The other tests skipped to fast merge
the valuation refactoring are re-enabled separately.

The restored files predate 8a5b99545dfa, which renamed the product field
expense_policy to reinvoice_policy, so the domain and the test use the
new name.

---
I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#278698
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#275246

Currently, an error occurs when a visitor record is created through the kiosk in Frontdesk.

**Steps to Reproduce;**
 - Install the `frontdesk` module.
 - Go to `Employees` and create a new employee or open an existing one. 
    Set the employee's `email` and `work phone`.
 - Go to `Frontdes` > `Stations` and create a station.
 - Enable `Host Selection` and select that employee.
 - Enable `Notify by email` and remove the `Frontdesk email template`.
 - Open the `kiosk URL`, fill in the information, click `Browse All Hosts`, 
   select that `employee`, and click `Continue`.
 - Error is logged in the terminal.

**Another case:**
 - Clear the `email template`, disable `Notify by email`, and perform `step 6th`.
 - The same error is raised.

`ValueError: Expected singleton: mail.template()`

After [recent commit], when a visitor record is created [1] through the kiosk and the selected 
host has a work email while Notify by email is enabled on the station, the system attempts to 
notify the host by email [2] . During this process, it renders the email body [3] and subject 
using the station's mail template, which raises an error [4] when no mail template is configured.
Similarly, when Notify by email is disabled, if the selected host has no linked user record 
but does have a work email, the notification falls back to email [5]. This also raises the same 
error when no mail template is configured.

This commit ensure a mail template is required whenever Notify by email is enabled on a station.
For the fallback email notification (when the host has no user account), the system checks that 
both a work email and a mail template are available before attempting to send the email, 
since email notifications are not mandatory in this case.

[recent commit]: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/pull/108297/changes

[1]: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/d025c1a6a87a90bdaead4195e5f996d058294604/frontdesk/controllers/main.py#L151-L162

[2]- https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/d025c1a6a87a90bdaead4195e5f996d058294604/frontdesk/models/frontdesk_visitor.py#L112-L113

[3]- https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/d025c1a6a87a90bdaead4195e5f996d058294604/frontdesk/models/frontdesk_visitor.py#L128-L131

[4]: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/c76a3aedf523da6f751960d2b5dfbc0016416ef1/addons/mail/models/mail_render_mixin.py#L765

[5]- https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/d025c1a6a87a90bdaead4195e5f996d058294604/frontdesk/models/frontdesk_visitor.py#L108-L111

sentry-7624715784

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#125178

Steps to Reproduce:

- write on ir.model.data to modify noupdate.
- _lookup_xmlids still returns the old noupdate value.

Example:
In [1]: imd = self.env['ir.model.data']

In [2]: xml_id = self.env['ir.model.data'].search([], limit=1)

In [3]: imd._lookup_xmlids([xml_id.complete_name], self.env[xml_id.model])
Out[3]: [(18603, 'auth_signup', 'action_send_password_reset_instructions', 'ir.actions.server', 149, False, 149)]

In [4]: xml_id.write({'noupdate': not xml_id.noupdate})
Out[4]: True

In [5]: imd._lookup_xmlids([xml_id.complete_name], self.env[xml_id.model])
Out[5]: [(18603, 'auth_signup', 'action_send_password_reset_instructions', 'ir.actions.server', 149, False, 149)]

In [6]: imd.flush_model()

In [7]: imd._lookup_xmlids([xml_id.complete_name], self.env[xml_id.model])
Out[7]: [(18603, 'auth_signup', 'action_send_password_reset_instructions', 'ir.actions.server', 149, True, 149)]

Issue:

- _lookup_xmlids is returning values from ir.model.data executing an SQL query w/o flushing.

Fix:

- Add flushing in _lookup_xmlids.

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#262791

**Behavior:**
When a sales user without accounting access rights tries to view an invoice created from a sale order where a cash rounding is applied, an AccessError is raised.

This occurs because loading the invoice view triggers `_compute_tax_totals()`, which then passes the invoice's `invoice_cash_rounding_id` to `_get_tax_totals_summary()`. Which then ends up failing when trying to access fields on the `cash_rounding` record  due to missing accounting rights, even though the user is allowed to view the parent invoice.

This is fixed by ensuring reading fields on `cash_rounding` during tax total computation bypasses the access check using `sudo()`, as the user already has legitimate access to the invoice itself.

**Steps to reproduce:**
- As an admin, enable cash rounding then create one.
- Create an invoice and set the Cash Rounding Method
- In debug mode, go to 'Set Default Values' in the debug dropdown and set Cash Rounding Method = your rounding for all users
- Go to users, and ensures that Demo has no accounting rights but has sales user rights
- As Demo, create a sale order, confirm it, then create the related invoice.
- When trying to acces said invoice, you should get an Access Error

opw-6379781

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#284212
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#278815

**Steps to reproduce:**
- Create a quotation
- Add order lines until reaching 200 (duplicating helps), save and ensure that the pager appeared (1-200/201)
- Drag one of the lines with the handle to reorder them
- Discard all changes (X shaped button) 

You will have an evaluation error

**Behavior:**
When loading a list of records exceeding the limit, only parts of the records are saved in `_cache`.
When triggering a reordering of said list, all records need to be loaded including the ones on other pages: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/d4eff7b14d37a9b59c95d304542a5a12629bc90b/addons/web/static/src/model/relational_model/static_list.js#L1139-L1149 `_getResIdsToLoad()` gets all Ids missing from the cache, these are then passed through `._createRecordDatapoint` and will then be stored in `_cache`.
The issue is that the Datapoints are getting created with only `activeFields` as data, which in our case are `id` and `sequence`

When discarding the changes `._checkValidity()`is called on each Datapoint: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/d4eff7b14d37a9b59c95d304542a5a12629bc90b/addons/web/static/src/model/relational_model/record.js#L423-L429 And then `._isInvisible()` is called.
This is where the issue happens, since only `sequence` and `id` are stored, when we try evaluate `combo_item_id`, which is the condition to see if sequence is invisible, `combo_item_id` is not found and we get an Evaluation Error.

This commit prevents going into `._checkValidity()` by adding `this.isInEdition` to the check leading to it, requiring that the record is in 'edit' mode which is not the case for records created with `_createRecordDatapoint()`

opw-6399024

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#281018

**Step to reproduce :**

1. Create Product A and enable lot tracking for it.
2. Create a Kit product and add Product A as one of its components.
3. Go to PoS and create orders using:
  - Product A
  - The Kit product
  - A combination of Product A and the Kit product
4. Create three different orders with these combinations.
5. Try to close the PoS session.

**Issue :**

An error occurs when attempting to close the PoS session.

The issue is in the pos_mrp module, specifically in the _get_lot_line_qty method. When accessing the following line:

`lines_data[move.bom_line_id.bom_id.product_tmpl_id.product_variant_id.id]['order_lines'].qty`

we expect order_lines to contain a single record. However, in this scenario, multiple order lines can be returned for the same product. As a result, accessing .qty directly on order_lines raises a singleton error.

**Solution :**

With this fix, we first retrieve the quantity from each order line and thensum the quantities together.

This ensures that multiple matching order lines are handled correctly and prevents the singleton error when closing the PoS session.

opw-6442765

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#285612
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#281622

When an incoming mail server has the "Keep Original" option enabled, a
copy of every incoming mail is stored as original_email.eml. Because it
is not a document of the invoice, the system unattaches it, however
it may still be used as main attachment in case no other PDF or image
was attached to the message.

Steps to reproduce:
- Configure an incoming mail server with "Keep Original" enabled, using
  an alias pointing to a vendor bill journal.
- Send a mail to that alias containing an xml embedding a PDF.
- Open that bill

Issue:
The invoice's main attachment points to the .eml file.
This occurs because it is set before the PDF is extracted from the xml.
Then, when import extracts the PDF, it is added as attachment on the invoice,
but we already have a main attachment that won't be overwritten.
However, once a pdf or image is added as attachment, the system will show
the (broken) preview.

opw-6431726

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#285409
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#280318

Steps to reproduce:
- Call your softphone with your smartphone.
- Let the smartphone ring forever. => At some point, you reach the voicemail and the softphone stops ringing but: - The softphone displays a weird message with emojis. - The call record stays "Trying to call" (and might *display* "Ended unexpectedly" in 19.2).

This commit fixes those two issues by showing a proper "Call missed" message and switching the call record status to "Missed". This is done in 19.2 and not before... because the behavior before is even more problematic:
- 19.1: the softphone keeps ringing and crash if you try to answer, that was mostly fixed thanks to [1] and this commit takes profit of those big ameliorations to fix the issue here.
- 19.0: you do not even reach voicemail (it stops without saying anything). This was apparently fixed as a side-effect of [2], which we do not consider worth even partially backporting as not critical.

[1]: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/commit/942f32316ab02d8c739fe7fdd5ec2bdde472a68e
[2]: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/commit/d24d7f3406ca47e7ac529d69957b0ad481d553bf

task-6453500

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#128731
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#127075

Before this commit, the mail files of WebSuite.test_unit_desktop take the heap from 82 MB to 1665 MB, read on the [MEMINFO] line each file logs after a forced major GC. Past 2 GB that GC stops returning on runbot and the suite dies on "AssertionError: Script timeout exceeded".

This happens because a record holds its computeds in a RecordScope that only the deletion of that record destroys, and a test deletes no record. The test teardown calls _runDisposeFns on the store, which stops what each record registered there and destroys the scope of the store alone, so every computed stays an observer of the signals it read. Message.richBody reads a signal of the module-level emojiLoader, so each message ever rendered keeps its store, its env and its app alive for the whole browser session.

This commit registers the destruction of a record scope among the dispose functions of the store, so that the store teardown reaches the computeds of every record, as it already reaches the effect of every compute field. The same run then ends on 127 MB.

https://runbot.odoo.com/odoo/error/946840

## Description of the issue/feature this PR addresses:

Two related Nilvera e-invoice issues affecting Turkish companies:
- The "Fetch Nilvera PDF" button appeared for every company, not just Turkish ones.
- Sending/fetching e-invoices (or fetching the PDF) as a non-admin Invoicing user raised an
  AccessError, because the company's Nilvera API key field is restricted to System/Settings users
  and several call sites read it without `.sudo()`.

## Current behavior before PR:

- The PDF-fetch button shows on both the list view and form view of `account.move` regardless of
  the company's country.
- An Invoicing-only user (no System/Settings access) gets an AccessError when sending/fetching
  e-invoices or fetching the PDF, because `_get_nilvera_client` reads
  `company.l10n_tr_nilvera_api_key` without `.sudo()`.

## Desired behavior after PR is merged:

- Both buttons are only visible for Turkish companies (the list-view button has no bound record, so
  its gate is driven by a new `l10n_tr` session_info/JS context injection instead of a direct field
  reference).
- Invoicing users can send/fetch e-invoices and fetch the PDF without hitting an AccessError.

## Things to add on forward-port

The `.sudo()` fix lives inside `_get_nilvera_client` itself (`l10n_tr_nilvera/lib/nilvera_client.py`),
so every caller that goes through it is already fixed automatically once this diff forward-ports.
Only call sites that read `company.l10n_tr_nilvera_api_key` **directly**, bypassing
`_get_nilvera_client`, still need their own `.sudo()`:

### 19.4
- [ ] Fix e-Dispatch/e-Receipt fetch gate-check access error (direct read of the API-key field,
      sudo it the same way as `_l10n_tr_nilvera_company_get_documents` in this PR)

task-6328589
I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#285360
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#274312

**Steps to reproduce:**
- create a storable product with a positive quantity
a cost of 10 and average perpetual category
- confirm a SO for 1 quantity, validate delivery
- confirm invoice for 1 (COGS should be 10)
- return the delivery and validate
- create a credit note from the invoice for 1 and confirm
(COGS should be 10)
- return the return and validate
- change the standard price to 100
- create an invoice from the SO for 1 and confirm

**Current behavior:**
cogs are 190

**Expected behavior:**
cogs should be 100

**Cause of the issue:**
_get_posted_cogs_value doesn't take into account 
the credit notes (only the account moves with type 
'out_invoice' are taken into account in the sum)
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/0824dc24665de6bfa805d540e756cdcb006edba6/addons/sale_stock/models/account_move.py#L185-L186
So in our case the first invoice and the credit 
note don't cancel out each other.

The same goes for _get_cogs_qty (which returns 
the total cogs past + current), in the past cogs 
it doesn't take into account the quantities of the 
credit note.
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/0824dc24665de6bfa805d540e756cdcb006edba6/addons/sale_stock/models/account_move.py#L172-L174
So the quantity of the first invoice and the one of the 
credit note don't cancel out each other.

As a result, the return value from _get_cogs_value() 
for the second invoice is : 
price unit = 100 
returned by _get_cogs_price_unit()
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/0824dc24665de6bfa805d540e756cdcb006edba6/addons/stock_account/models/account_move_line.py#L68
which returned the standard price because 
the product has an average cost method
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/0824dc24665de6bfa805d540e756cdcb006edba6/addons/stock_account/models/stock_move.py#L275-L280

cogs_qty = 2 (instead of 1 if credit was taken into account 
as -1 in the sum)
self._get_posted_cogs_value() = 10 (instead of 0 if credit note 
cogs were taken into account  in the sum as -10)
return value = (100 * 2 -10)/1 = 190
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/0824dc24665de6bfa805d540e756cdcb006edba6/addons/stock_account/models/account_move_line.py#L75
**fix:**
if we take into account the credit note 
the return value will be : 
(100 * 1 - 0)/1 = 100

the mechanism of the already posted cogs value 
is there for cases where we only delivered a part of 
the quantity and then delivered the rest, but in 
the case where we delivered and then returned 
(with credit notes) it shouldn't have an impact. 
Thus the idea to include the credit note so 
that it can cancel out the first invoice

opw-6426111

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#284151
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#282893

Previously, holiday pay regularization was calculated using the current payslip's wage, causing past leave values to change whenever the salary was updated.

Update `_get_holiday_pay_regularization` to compute the remaining balance directly from historical 90% recovered amounts (`HolPayRec`) and the attestation cap. This ensures the regularization stays fixed based on the wage at the time leave was taken.

During the year, paid leave days deduct 90% of the wage (HolPayRec). During the annual
regularization, this method calculates the adjustment needed to reach 100% of the wage
equivalent, capped by the total attestation amount (amount_to_recover).

Variables:
    - recovered_amount: Total 90% leave deductions (HolPayRec) already applied.
    - amount_to_recover: Total holiday pay cap from previous year's attestations.
    - total_100_pct_wage: 100% wage equivalent ((recovered_amount / 9.0) * 10.0).
    - max_recoverable: Upper limit allowed to recover, min(total_100_pct_wage, amount_to_recover).
    - regularization_amount: Difference between max_recoverable and recovered_amount.

Formula:
    regularization_amount = min((recovered_amount / 9.0) * 10.0, amount_to_recover) - recovered_amount
    Return value = -regularization_amount

Examples:
    1. Negative Return Value (Deduction / Further Recovery):
       - amount_to_recover = €1,000
       - recovered_amount = €450 (90%)
       - total_100_pct_wage = (450 / 9) * 10 = €500
       - max_recoverable = min(500, 1000) = €500
       - regularization_amount = 500 - 450 = €50
       - Return: -€50 (Deducts remaining 10% from employee).

    2. Positive Return Value (Refund / Over-recovery Correction):
       - amount_to_recover = €300 (Low attestation cap)
       - recovered_amount = €450 (Already recovered throughout the year)
       - total_100_pct_wage = (450 / 9) * 10 = €500
       - max_recoverable = min(500, 300) = €300
       - regularization_amount = 300 - 450 = -€150
       - Return: +€150 (Refunds €150 to employee because recovery exceeded the attestation cap).

Returns:
    tuple: (-regularization_amount, explanation_info)

Task : 6453625

The search order on account move line depends on date, move name and id.
This search result order can be non deterministic because,
when creating account move line from stock valuation, it depends on the order from a set, but sets are unordered.

**Step to reproduce**
Run [test_subcontracting_purchase_bill](https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/13b2781978b0edad0df0800404276919b767e32b/addons/mrp_subcontracting_purchase/tests/test_mrp_subcontracting_purchase.py#L268) in:
Single app, community, with demo data.

**Observation**
* The search:
When doing the search since we didn't specify any order,
the search from account.move.line will ordered by:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/3dd41395e2e4205fa477eb474d4a4dba0a976154/addons/account/models/account_move_line.py#L23
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/3dd41395e2e4205fa477eb474d4a4dba0a976154/addons/account/models/account_move_line.py#L1664
Since, for the components the date and move name are the same it will only depend on the aml ids:

* `Account.move.line` creation:
When it validate the receipt (`button_validate`)
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/869c750f978b1b00a4a04bd61226f0e20d2e7729/addons/mrp_subcontracting_purchase/tests/test_mrp_subcontracting_purchase.py#L296

It will mark as done the picking (`_action_done`) and the productions (`button_mark_done`) linked to this picking.
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/869c750f978b1b00a4a04bd61226f0e20d2e7729/addons/stock/models/stock_picking.py#L1429
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/869c750f978b1b00a4a04bd61226f0e20d2e7729/addons/mrp_subcontracting/models/stock_picking.py#L49
Modify the inventory accordingly (`_post_inventory`)
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/869c750f978b1b00a4a04bd61226f0e20d2e7729/addons/mrp/models/mrp_production.py#L2231
while inside of `_post_inventory`, it will process all the production moves, for this it will divided them in set to process them by batch:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/f0e58b9324af18d0cf0264aec2886d098e997f03/addons/mrp/models/mrp_production.py#L1904-L1911

From this set, it will create the `account.move.line`:
It retrieve the actual stock move with the browse, and call `_action_done`, from where the stock valuation layer will create the `account.move.line`.
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/f0e58b9324af18d0cf0264aec2886d098e997f03/addons/mrp/models/mrp_production.py#L1913
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/f0e58b9324af18d0cf0264aec2886d098e997f03/addons/stock_account/models/stock_move.py#L187
The issue arise because a set read order is non deterministic.

runbot-939794

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#279396

Currently, an error occurs when a user tries to view the WhatsApp Business account.

**Steps to Reproduce:**

 - Install the `whatsapp_oauth` module.
 - Go to `Settings` > `Languages` and add `French (BE)`, then `switch to it`.
 - Go to `WhatsApp` > `Configuration` > `WhatsApp Business Accounts (Comptes Whatsapp Business)`.

`ValueError: L'élément '<xpath expr="//div[contains(normalize-space(.), 'Receiving Messages')]">' ne peut être localisé dans la vue parente`

When the user changes the language, the text in the view is translated [1]. Since the WhatsApp 
account view tries to locate the div using the plain text Receiving Messages [2]. Since the text 
has been translated in the parent view, the XPath can no longer locate the element and raise 
the error.

This commit ensures that the XPath uses the name attribute to identify the element, which is 
language-independent. We cannot use the class attribute because the same class is used by 
other div elements.

[1]- https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/a3db72899cb97612505aebbd5450aeb65205db73/whatsapp/views/whatsapp_account_views.xml#L81-L84

[2]- https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/a3db72899cb97612505aebbd5450aeb65205db73/whatsapp_oauth/views/whatsapp_account_views.xml#L61-L63

sentry-7534862409

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#130003

Currently, an error occurs when the user removes the payslip period.

**Steps to Reproduce:**
 - Install the `hr_payroll` module.
 - Go to `Employees` and create an `employee`, or use an existing one.
 - Make sure the `employee's version` has a `contract start date`.
 - Go to `Payroll` > `Payslips` > `Payslips` and create a payslip.
 - Select that `employee` on the payslip, then remove the `payslip start date`.

`TypeError: '<=' not supported between instances of 'datetime.date' and 'bool'`

After the [recent commit], which computes the version from the payslip period without allowing it to 
be overridden, when the user selects an employee whose version has a contract start date, it 
checks whether the version overlaps with the payslip period [1]. However, since the payslip 
dates have not yet been set, it raises an error.

This commit ensures that the check for the version overlapping with the payslip period is 
skipped if the payslip does not have both a start and end date. It also makes the method 
depend on date_to, because if the user changes the payslip end date, it should recheck 
whether the version overlaps with the payslip period.

[recent commit]: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/commit/569ce2af32477d410b79e98ca72729385042619b

[1]- https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/8a66d7beabe6f9b28000ef12725f3a9937d5d1ee/hr_payroll/models/hr_payslip.py#L1716-L1725

sentry-7632216317

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#126515

### Steps to reproduce: 

- Create a subcontracted product P1
- Create a storable product P2
- Buy 5 units of both products from your subcontractor
- On the receipt set both moves quantity to 2 Units
- Validate the receipt and create a backorder
#### > Only the subcontracted move has been kept on the receipt and a backorder was created for 3 units of P1 and 5 of P2.

### Cause of the issue:

Setting the quantity of the subcontracted move will automatically record the quantities on the subcontracted MO: 
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/9440ff9064c77af0159a427de8f5e5721aec0de5/addons/mrp_subcontracting/models/stock_move.py#L83
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/9440ff9064c77af0159a427de8f5e5721aec0de5/addons/mrp_subcontracting/models/stock_move.py#L123
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/9440ff9064c77af0159a427de8f5e5721aec0de5/addons/mrp_subcontracting/models/mrp_production.py#L91
However, the `_update_finished_move` method adds and update the related subcontracted move lines marking them as *picked* to adapt the related reservation:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/9440ff9064c77af0159a427de8f5e5721aec0de5/addons/mrp_subcontracting/models/mrp_production.py#L118-L164
This is problematic since picking a move line will also pick the move:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/9440ff9064c77af0159a427de8f5e5721aec0de5/addons/stock/models/stock_move.py#L261-L267
And only picked moves are considered to be processed at picking validation.

### Note:

The exact same issue had already been fixed in 17.0: db8b33ebb9fe23507bcba30b12741e4d688ae549
However, the fix had an issue concerning the barcode behavior as it removed the picked computation for subcontracted moves which made  hybrid pickings such as the above one (with one subcontracted and one non-subcontracted move) impossible to process in the barcode app. As such, the fix and test where reverted in cf2d18c92bee55ef79db1a338e9baf12f258ee5b

The present commit provides an alternative fix of the original issue keeping subcontracted moves unpicked by quantity changes without affecting the picked computation of subcontracted moves (e.g. adding  a picked move line on a subcontracted move will still pick that move).

Enterprise: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/pull/123884

opw-6330584

---
I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#285614
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#275304

Problem:
In Calendar, dragging a slot opens the quick create dialog. Typing a
subject and clicking the expand button in the dialog header creates the
event, but the form that opens is empty, and saving it creates a second
event for the same slot.

Cause:
`FormViewDialog` stores the id of the record it saved in `currentResId`,
which `onExpand` passes as `res_id`. `saveRecord` sets it only in the
branch that runs when no `onRecordSave` prop is given.
`AttendeeCalendarController` passes one since 30478fe855cd
(odoo/odoo#239435), so `currentResId` stays false and the action opens a
new record.

Solution:
Set `currentResId` in the shared branch of `saveRecord`. It is private to
`FormViewDialog`, so a consumer passing `onRecordSave` cannot set it.

Steps to reproduce:
- Open Calendar.
- Drag a slot in the week view to open the quick create dialog.
- Type a meeting subject.
- Click the expand button in the dialog header.
- Observe that the form opens on a new record while the event is created.

Ticket [link](https://www.odoo.com/odoo/project/49/tasks/6476930)

opw-6476930

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#285899

Problem:
When applying color on a selection that spans across partially selected inline elements (e.g. `<p><b>a[b</b>c]d</p>`), container elements whose contents are not fully selected (such as `<b>`) were included in `targetedNodes`. This caused improper color formatting/nesting on partially selected elements.

Cause:
In `ColorPlugin._applyColor()`, `targetedNodes` were filtered by checking `isNodeEditable(node)` and `nodeName !== "T"`, but did not check whether the contents of `node` were fully selected (`areNodeContentsFullySelected(node)`). As a result, partially selected ancestor elements were included in `targetedNodes`.

Solution:
Filter `targetedNodes` in `_applyColor()` using
`this.dependencies.selection.areNodeContentsFullySelected(node)` to ensure only fully selected nodes are targeted when applying colors.

Steps to reproduce:
1. Open html_editor.
2. Insert content: `<p><b>ab</b>cd</p>`.
3. Select `b` inside `<b>` and `c` inside `<p>` (`<p><b>a[b</b>c]d</p>`).
4. Apply text color (e.g. red).
5. Observe "ab" and "c" was colored instead of just "b" and "c".

task-6456443

---
I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#285658
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#281462

### Issue before this commit:
When a CFDI invoice was sent through a mass action (Send & Print executed by OdooBot), the unit of measure in the generated CFDI appeared in English instead of the configured language (e.g. Spanish.

### Steps to reproduce the issue:
1.Download Accounting, Contacts and l10n_mx
2. Switch to Spanish (MX) language
3. Set the language of "Inmoviliaria CVA" and "XENON INDUSTRIAL ARTICLES" to Spanish (MX)
4. In contacts select Archived in filters and switch OdooBot language to Spanish (MX)
5. Create and confirm two invoices in the database, one for each customer but don't send these invoices
6. Go to the list view and select these two invoices, and click on "Send and print" and select CFDI
7. Check any of the XML files generated in any of the invoices (in the CFDI tab of the invoice)
8. See that the UoM in the XML file, will be set in english rather than Spanish (MX)

### Cause of the issue:
The context under which the batch action runs does not contain the lang key. As a result, translated fields (such as product_uom_id.name) were read in the source language (English) instead of the executing user's language, because nothing in the CFDI generation chain explicitly forced the correct lang into the context.

### Reason to introduce the fix:
A CFDI must always report translated fields in the correct language. The fix ensures the invoice is read with the executing user's language when the context doesn't already specify one, so translated fields are consistently correct across both flows.

opw-6399860

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#129916
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#125698

Currently, an error occurs when the user tries to update suggested products.

**Steps to Reproduce:**
 - Install the `website_sale` module.
 - Go to `Settings` and enable `Automate suggested products` under the `eCommerce` section.
 - Go to `Website` > `eCommerce` > `Products` > `Products`.
 - Create a `product` and, in the `eCommerce` tab, add a `category`.
 - Make sure the `product` is `not published`.
 - On the `product`, click the `gear icon` and select `Update suggested products`.

`ValueError: TypeError('unsupported operand types in: product.template() | None') while evaluating 'records.action_update_suggested_products()'`

When the user updates suggested products, the system updates the product's suggested 
products - optional, accessory, and alternative products [1]. While updating the alternative 
products [2], the system tries to find products based on the categories and attributes shared 
with the current product [3]. When retrieving products from the current product's category, 
it gets None [4] because the products linked to that category are unpublished and are 
therefore excluded by the domain [5]. Later, using this None value raise the error.

This commit ensures that when accessing a missing key in the category dictionary, then it falls 
back to an empty product recordset.

[1]: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/21e3310a3eba2ce915b33cf10ee4c14bdda7aad4/addons/website_sale/models/product_template.py#L346

[2]: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/21e3310a3eba2ce915b33cf10ee4c14bdda7aad4/addons/website_sale/models/product_template.py#L384-L386

[3]: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/21e3310a3eba2ce915b33cf10ee4c14bdda7aad4/addons/website_sale/models/product_template.py#L471-L483

[4]- https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/21e3310a3eba2ce915b33cf10ee4c14bdda7aad4/addons/website_sale/models/product_template.py#L482

[5]- https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/21e3310a3eba2ce915b33cf10ee4c14bdda7aad4/addons/website_sale/models/product_template.py#L445-L456

sentry-7660509183

---
I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#281487

# Before this commit:
The image controller performance test expects the admin partner to be
unpublished. In parallel test runs, the website_partner demo data
publishes the admin partner, causing the test to follow a different
code path and fail.

However, during parallel test execution, the website_partner module
installs its demo data, which updates the admin partner:

```
<record id="base.partner_admin" model="res.partner">
    <field name="is_published">True</field>
</record>
```

As a result, user_admin.website_published becomes True.

# After this commit:
The test explicitly restores the required precondition by setting the
admin partner's is_published value to False before executing the
performance check.

As a result, the image controller always follows the expected
"unpublished" code path, making the test deterministic regardless of
whether website_partner or any other module with demo data has already
been installed during parallel testing.

Runbot-241102

---
I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#278550

Currently, an error occurs when loading the sample data in the Shop Floor.

**Steps to Reproduce:**
 - Install the `mrp_workorder` module.
 - Go to `Employees` > `Configuration` > `Working Schedules`.
 - Delete the `Work Center 40 hours/week` record.
 - Go to `Settings` > `Users & Companies` > `Groups`.
 - Open the `Manage Work Order Operation` group and add the `Administrator` to the `users` list.
 - Open the `Shop Floor`. If the `Activate your Work Center` dialog appears, click it and then click `Configure Later`.
 - Click `Load Samples`.

`ValueError: External ID not found in the system: mrp.mrp_workcenter_calendar`

After the [recent commit], the sample work center uses the `Work Center 40 hours/week` working 
schedule instead of `Standard 40 hours/week`. As a result, if the `Work Center 40 hours/week` 
record is deleted, loading the sample data raises the error [1].

This commit ensures that when the Work Center 40 hours/week calendar is not available, it 
falls back to `Standard 40 hours/week`, restoring the previous behavior [2].
This fallback is required because `resource_calendar_id` is mandatory from the view perspective, 
even though it is not required at the model level. If it is left empty, the form displays a missing 
required field. The `Standard 40 hours/week` calendar is always available because it is linked to 
the main company [3] and its `resource_calendar_id` field uses `ondelete='restrict'` [4], preventing 
it from being deleted.

[recent commit]: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/commit/336d721f7b353473fe5e07c29ce14ed77a88fb98

[1]- https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/c0045ec3cf94650d66192a4ca3e0dc3c17daa5bd/mrp_workorder/models/mrp_production.py#L213-L216

[2]- https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/51c1e74e90e510d59aad78820e2c29e821ba2854/mrp_workorder/models/mrp_production.py#L214-L217

[3]: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/4c4219a7d9d51f703b15e83ab755faf1f2c8a71d/addons/resource/data/resource_data.xml#L10-L12

[4]: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/4c4219a7d9d51f703b15e83ab755faf1f2c8a71d/addons/resource/models/res_company.py#L12-L13

sentry-7651161729

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#126859

**Steps to Reproduce:**
- Install the Time Off app and Belgian Payroll (l10n_be_hr_payroll).
- Create and validate an accrual allocation for currently logged-in user with: No end date Any start date An accrual plan configured with a carry-over milestone Any Time Off Type
- Create another allocation for the same employee, using the same accrual plan and same Time Off Type, but with a different start date that is not in the future.
- Select the accrual plan. The error is raised immediately during the onchange.

**Issue:**
- When the accrual allocation onchange computes the accrued balance, a temporary allocation is used internally to simulate the accrual computation.
- This temporary record is discarded after the computation.
- The discarded temporary record can remain pending for computed field recomputation.
- When the onchange later triggers recomputation, the stale temporary NewId can cause: `KeyError: <NewId origin=18>`

**Root Cause:**
- Temporary allocations created with 'new(origin=allocation)' can add computed fields to `env.transaction.tocompute`.
- `invalidate_recordset()` clears the temporary record's cache but does not remove the `NewId` from the pending recomputation queue.
- Since the temporary record has no database row to recompute from, the NewId can later be picked up during recomputation.
- This can lead to a KeyError when the framework tries to access cached data for the discarded temporary record.

**Solution:**
- Properly discard temporary allocations after the accrual simulation.
- In addition to invalidating the cache, remove the temporary NewId from `env.transaction.tocompute` using `remove_to_compute()`.
- Use this cleanup for temporary allocations created with `new(origin=...)`.

**Result**
- Prevents the KeyError during accrual allocation onchange.
- Allows users to create another allocation with the same accrual plan without triggering the RPC error.

**opw-6390559**

---
I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#285799
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#283772

Steps to reproduce the issue:

- Create a link in editor.
- Copy another URL.
- Select entire link.
- Pasting copied link throws traceback.

This issue happens after merging commit [1] where `normalize_processors` callback returns nothing. After merging commit [2] each processor must return the original root if no processing is needed or processing is in place.

As a result, when this.processThrough("normalize_processors", container) is called from the `insert` method, the next processor in the chain uses `this.editable` as its default argument and removes the FEFF node, which is the anchor node. Later calling closestBlock(selection.anchorNode) returns null, resulting in the traceback. This PR aims to fix the traceback by returning the `root` in processor.

[1]: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/be77a9a2003e09f4621d0ff774bf8749b326d037
[2]: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/17d58d2fdf8da3a69c731fc5ea0d90b95e28efd6

task-6456004






---
I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#283185

### Steps to Reproduce:
1. Go to Sales > Configuration > Settings
2. Under Quotations & Orders, enable "Lock Confirmed Sales"
3. Now create a Quotation with 2 products, 1 with attributes and 1 without
4. Confirm the order
5. Hover over the product with attributes and notice that it allows you to to edit, but hovering over the other product does NOT reveal the edit icon

### Issue:
When a user has configured their database to lock sale orders, it should not be possible to edit the products once the order has been confirmed. It currently only happens for products that have attributes. While standard products cannot be edited in a locked state, a missing condition on configurable products allows the button to persist when hovering over the description column. This creates an inconsistent UI state where users appear to have access to modify some of the line items.

### Solution:
To fix this, we updated the `hasConfigurationButton` getter in `sale_product_mixin.js` to evaluate the parent document's locked state. By adding `!this.props.record.model.root.data.locked` to the getter's return logic, the edit button is now globally hidden across all related widgets (such as `sale_label_text` and `sale_product_field`) when the
sales order is locked. This ensures that configurable products properly respect the locked document restrictions just as standard products do. Additionally, this locked condition was applied to the method overrides in the `event_sale` and `event_booth_sale` modules, ensuring that event tickets and booths also hide their configuration buttons on locked orders.Additionally, this locked condition was applied to the method overrides in the event_sale and event_booth_sale modules, ensuring that event tickets and booths also hide their configuration buttons on locked orders.

opw-6512288

---
I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#284882

*=helpdesk_planning_field_service{,_sale_timesheet}

Steps to reproduce:
-------------------------
1. Install helpdesk_planning_field_service_sale_timesheet with demo data.
2. Open a helpdesk team (e.g., Customer Care) and enable field service planning.
3. Create a new ticket in Customer Care, plan two interventions, and mark them as completed.
4. Click the cog menu of the helpdesk ticket and click Preview.
5. In preview mode, click **Field Service** in the left sidebar.

Issue:
---------
A traceback occurs:
```python
File "/home/odoo/odoo/community/odoo/addons/base/models/ir_qweb.py", line 875, in _render_iterall
    raise QWebError(qweb_error_info) from error
odoo.addons.base.models.ir_qweb.QWebError: Error while rendering the template:
    KeyError: 'format_datetime'
    Template: planning_field_service.portal_my_field_service_report_list
    Reference: 866
    Path: /t/t/t[3]/t/tbody/t/tr/td[1]/a/t
    Element: <t t-out="format_datetime(intervention.start_datetime, dt_format='MMM d, YYYY')"/>
```

Cause:
---------
https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/28637781cd3ffc4c3dc0c2016dd5d6051793f641/helpdesk_planning_field_service/controllers/portal.py#L59-L63
After this 6857d1a, date formatting was changed to use `format_datetime`, and [planning_field_service](https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/28637781cd3ffc4c3dc0c2016dd5d6051793f641/planning_field_service/controllers/portal.py#L42) was updated accordingly. However, `helpdesk_planning_field_service` was not updated to pass `format_datetime` in the template values, causing a **KeyError** when opening the field service intervention list.

Solution:
-----------
Pass `format_datetime` in the template values, following the same approach used in `planning_field_service`.

opw-6467400

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#129227
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#128519