We need to be able to invoice free items. How it works in Peru is that the item is "sold" with the original price. Still, we should be able to mark the transaction as a free transaction (this is done with the field l10n_pe_edi_legend that is in the Peru EDI tab). This tag should change the XML to the correct format for a free transaction.

An enhancement is introduced to exclude the 'l10n_pe.tax_group_dummy' tax group from tax details processing.
This improvement is aimed at facilitating free billing in Peru by ensuring dummy tax groups are not included in tax calculations.

task latam: https://latam-localizations.odoo.com/web#id=974&menu_id=88&cids=1&action=188&model=project.task&view_type=form

Legal Reference: https://cpe.sunat.gob.pe/sites/default/files/inline-files/guia%2Bxml%2Bfactura%2Bversion%202-1%2B1%2B0%20%282%29_0.pdf (page 97)

https://booksdigital.jimdofree.com/2014/10/15/tratamiento-contable-de-la-entrega-de-obsequios-vales-y-celebraciones-a-favor-de-los-trabajadores/

Related: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/174131

TO REPRODUCE
===========
1. Create an appointment with users A and B
2. ...using 'no picture' and 'user then time'
3. go to front end
4. pick a date D both users have slots in
5. go to next month
6. change user in the dropdown (or change TZ)
7. slots appear for day D in previous month

ISSUE
=====

When selecting an other resource or user in the dropdown in resource_time mode, even if the selected one has no available slot for the current month, slots will appear in the slot list, corresponding to the first availability overall.

This leads to a very strange mismatch between the calendar dates and the slots. The user may select a slot and book for a month they do not currently see on the calendar.

SOLUTION
========

Now, we will select the previously selected date if it is in the current month and has slots. Otherwise we select the first day with slots in the currently displayed month (NOT overall). This way, the day is selected and displayed as so in the calendar. The slots match that day. If no availability exist for the current month, we do not click on any day, and show no slots.

Task-4169513

### Steps to reproduce:

- Create 2 storable products: Final product (FP) and Component (COMP)
- Put 10 units of COMP in stock
- Create a Bill of Material for FP:
  - raw move: 10 x COMP
  - 1 operation: "Register COMP"
  - Add an instruction on your operation:
    - type: "Register consumed component"
    - Product To Register: COMP
- Create and confirm an MO for 1 Unit of FP
- Go to the shopfloor > "Register COMP"
- Change the quantity to 3 > Validate
#### > Go back to the MO the quantity of the raw move is still 10

### Cause of the issue:

Clicking on "Validate" as well as on "Continue consumption" will trigger a call of the `_next` method with `continue_production=False` and `True` respectively:
https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/e86b97f57e2388b3b65326cecedd3c14ca02ddb1/mrp_workorder/models/quality.py#L346-L352 However, if you underconsume, a new move ine will be created for the remaining quantity in both cases and it should only when you `Continue consumption`.

### Note:

If you underconsume, and change the quantity of the raw move without changing its original demand. As such, its state will itself change. Hence, if you come back to the MO, the reservation sate of the MO will be recomputed and be updated from assigned to confirmed. However, as the raw move is picked it should not alter the reservation state of the MO anymore:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/9918e8f3d627f3c52238d6b04bcd15c05d34e40c/addons/mrp/models/mrp_production.py#L613 This is the purpose of the community PR.

opw-4216910

[FIX] documents{_sign}: fix access error applying sign action

How to reproduce:
- Install documents_sign and log as admin
- In documents, create an action (Workspace: Finance, Create: PDF to Sign)
- Then upload a pdf in the workspace Finance
- Log as Marc Demo
- In documents, select the PDF uploaded as admin
- Click on the action created

You get the error: "Sorry, you are not allowed to access this document." while the expected behavior is that users who have access to the document and to Sign should be able to use the action. We solve that in this commit.

We also add a test checking that applying an action to sign a pdf document not owned by the user that perform the action, doesn't duplicate the attachment if the attachment is owned by the document (res_id and res_model pointing to the document; the ownership is transferred to the sign.template created) and duplicate it otherwise.

Technical note: the error was caused by the trick used in the override of sign_template.create in documents_sign which was setting the res_model to False and res_id to 0 for attachment linked to document to allow the super method to link that attachment to the created sign_template (by releasing the ownership of the attachment from the document). But as ir_attachment prevents to link an attachment with res_id = 0 to a record if it is not done by the owner of that
attachment, there was an error. We remove that tricks by defining a method that determine if sign_template can take the ownership of the attachment or not which we override in document_sign and make it return True when the attachment is owned by a document.

Task-4000988

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#65206

StockMove.date does not represent the Scheduled date when the move is Done, but the date it was validated. Hence, if the move was validated outside the period it was made for, it will be accounted for in the future period.

To reproduce, you can:
- Create a subscription with a start_date in the past, so that today's date is in the SECOND period: Ex: Today = "2024-11-01"
    * Recurring plan: Monthly
    * Start Date: "2024-10-01"
- Trigger the cron to invoice & deliver the FIRST period ("2024-10-01" -> "2024-10-31").
- Validate the first period picking => "Scheduled Date" becomes the done date: "2024-11-01"
- Trigger the cron to invoice & deliver the SECOND period ("2024-11-01" -> "2024-11-30"). => Second period picking is NOT generated, because the first period picking was interpreted as belonging to the second period.

---

Test result before fix:
```
2024-11-07 13:44:54,695 34298 ERROR oes_17_test_sss odoo.addons.sale_subscription_stock.tests.test_sale_subscription_stock_order: FAIL: TestSubscriptionStockOnOrder.test_picking_done_in_another_period
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/home/odoo/projects/odoo-src/multiverse/src/17.0/enterprise/sale_subscription_stock/tests/test_sale_subscription_stock_order.py", line 543, in test_picking_done_in_another_period
    self.assertTrue(bool(second_picking))
AssertionError: False is not true
```

OPW-4280155

Version: 16.0+

Issue:
When we make commission on a subscription sale order, 
the subscription end and start dates are not passed through the order lines -> invoice lines and 
we run into an error when trying to create the corresponding purchase order.

Purpose of this PR:
If there are no subscription dates on the invoice lines 
then we do not calculate the length of the subscription in months and 
instead create the purchase order line description just as the commission for the corresponding subscription.

Steps to reproduce on runbot:
install partner_commission
set up a subscription with a referrer and a commission plan create invoice for the subscription
try to register the payment for the invoice
error raised regarding a max function with no args

Notes:
looking to investigate further why the subscription dates are not passed from 
the subscription to the order lines to the invoice lines

in 17.0+ field name is changed from `subscription_end_date` to `deferred_end_date` (same for `start` date),
will have to adjust in fw ports

opw-4240937

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#73428