Before this commit, when right-clicking on a link in a message of type email, this shows the message actions rather than the browser context menu.

We expect to display the browser context menu, as there are many handful feature of browser context menu for links. This was handled in earlier fixes [1][2], but these fixes were not working with messages of type email.

This didn't work because messages of type email are inside a shadow DOM, so `ev.target` is necessarily the shadow root and not the specific targeted element. This commit fixes the issue by using `ev.composedPath()` to pick the 1st element, so that this exposes the inner-most element inside the shadow DOM that has been right-clicked. This lets us ignore the showing of message actions in right-click when this comes from a link.

opw-6110949

[1]: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/244252
[2]: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/258681

Before / After

<img width="441" height="243" alt="before" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/f274e8d2-66af-442e-9a31-27ea1ce4d9bd" />
<img width="605" height="513" alt="after" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/3e241e83-93d0-47e6-970c-b5e5f339417d" />

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#263880
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#263622

Issue:
Unreconciling a payment in a batch payment from a recurring invoice will cause an invoice for the next recurring period to be generated

Steps to reproduce:
1. Create and confirm a monthly recurring invoice
2. Create a payment for the invoice
3. Create a batch payment and add the payment created in step 2 then validate it
4. Create a bank statement line and reconcile it with the batch payment created in step 3
5. Unreconcile the payment from the invoice from the invoice form view
6. Notice that a draft invoice for the next month’s recurring invoice is created

Cause:
When unreconciling the payment from the invoice via the invoice form view, the method “delete_reconciled_line” is called. In the “account_accountant_batch_payment” override of that method, it will reset the invoice back to draft and repost it. However, when posting a recurring invoice, the default behavior is to create the invoice for the next recurrence period

Solution:
Adding a new context flag called “skip_recurring_copy” will prevent the next period’s recurring invoice from being generated when invoices are posted through “delete_reconciled_line”

opw-6158881

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#263991

Issue:
Unreconciling a payment in a batch payment from a recurring invoice will cause an invoice for the next recurring period to be generated

Steps to reproduce:
1. Create and confirm a monthly recurring invoice
2. Create a payment for the invoice
3. Create a batch payment and add the payment created in step 2 then validate it
4. Create a bank statement line and reconcile it with the batch payment created in step 3
5. Unreconcile the payment from the invoice from the invoice form view
6. Notice that a draft invoice for the next month’s recurring invoice is created

Cause:
When unreconciling the payment from the invoice via the invoice form view, the method “delete_reconciled_line” is called. In the “account_accountant_batch_payment” override of that method, it will reset the invoice back to draft and repost it. However, when posting a recurring invoice, the default behavior is to create the invoice for the next recurrence period

Solution:
Adding a new context flag called “skip_recurring_copy” will prevent the next period’s recurring invoice from being generated when invoices are posted through “delete_reconciled_line”

opw-6158881

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#117011

Issue:
When creating a payment with an early payment discount, on an invoice using a cash rounding with a strategy of “Modify tax amount”, the early payment discount lines on the payment journal entry will be far off from the correct amount

Steps to reproduce:
1. Create a sales tax for 8.1%
2. Create a cash rounding record for 0.05 as the rounding precision, “Modify tax amount” as the rounding strategy, and “Nearest” as the rounding method
3. Create a payment term with early payment discount of 2% if paid within 18 days. And reduced tax on early payment. With a due term of 100% 30 days after the invoice date
4. Create an invoice on 1/1 with a subtotal of 339.60 and the tax of 8.1% and add the cash rounding method and payment term created earlier
5. Create a payment for it 9 days later on 1/10 for the full amount after the early payment discount is applied

Cause:
tax_amounts is grabbing the amount for a certain tax from the last line on the invoice with the same tax_repartition_line_id. Usually there is only one tax line representing a certain tax on an invoice. However, when a cash rounding is applied to the invoice with a strategy of “Modify tax amount”, the cash rounding line that is created will also have the same tax_repartition_line_id. In that case, it will grab the amount on the cash rounding line instead of adding the first tax amount with the cash rounding line amount

Solution:
In tax_amounts, add to the accumulating value if a tax repartition line id already exists as a key otherwise, insert it into tax_amounts

opw-5998497

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#259025

The content of an invoice's section lines is not aligned with the columns when the prices of the section are hidden and the country of origin is displayed in the invoice

Steps to reproduce:
1. Install account_intrastat module
2. Go to Invoicing > Customers > Products and create a new product with name "test" and in the Accounting tab, set the Country of Origin to Afghanistan
3. Go to Invoicing > Customers > Customers and change Acme Corporation's country to United Kingdom
4. Go to Invoicing > Customers > Invoices and create a new invoice for partner Acme Corporation, add a section line and in that section, add product "test"
5. Click on the three dots at the end of the section line and click on Hide Prices
6. Confirm the invoice and print it
7. The content of the section line in the invoice pdf are not aligned (the tax is in column Unit Price and the amount is in column Taxes)

Issue:
When a section is hidden, no column is added in the section to display the origin, resulting in a misalignment of the tax and the amount of the section

Solution:
Add a column for the origin country in hidden section lines and add the origin country in product lines of `_get_child_lines`

opw-6147929

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#264118
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#263499

The content of an invoice's section lines is not aligned with the columns when the prices of the section are hidden and the country of origin is displayed in the invoice

Steps to reproduce:
1. Install account_intrastat module
2. Go to Invoicing > Customers > Products and create a new product with name "test" and in the Accounting tab, set the Country of Origin to Afghanistan
3. Go to Invoicing > Customers > Customers and change Acme Corporation's country to United Kingdom
4. Go to Invoicing > Customers > Invoices and create a new invoice for partner Acme Corporation, add a section line and in that section, add product "test"
5. Click on the three dots at the end of the section line and click on Hide Prices
6. Confirm the invoice and print it
7. The content of the section line in the invoice pdf are not aligned (the tax is in column Unit Price and the amount is in column Taxes)

Issue:
When a section is hidden, no column is added in the section to display the origin, resulting in a misalignment of the tax and the amount of the section

Solution:
Add a column for the origin country in hidden section lines and add the origin country in product lines of `_get_child_lines`

opw-6147929

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#117092
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#115442

Steps to reproduce
1. Open any kanban view declaring a <progressbar> (e.g. Project > Tasks, or Field Service > My Tasks).
2. Group by a date or datetime field with a granularity (e.g. Creation Date: Year, planned_date_begin:day).
3. Have records spread across several groups with different state values (done, in progress, canceled, ...).
4. Observe the colored progress bar at the top of each column.

Issue
Every column's progress bar renders as a uniform grey block regardless of the actual state distribution of its records. The effect is visible only when grouping by a date/datetime field; grouping by stage or assignees still works.

The kanban relies on two separate RPCs whose keys must match: formatted_read_group (used by web_read_group) returns the columns the client stores, and the client uses each column's formatted groupby value as the lookup key; read_progress_bar returns a dict mapping that same key to per-state counts.

For a datetime group by with a time granularity,
formatted_read_group goes through _web_read_group_groupby_formatter, which localizes the naive timestamp in the user's timezone and then converts it to UTC before strftime, see
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/8d80ed39a2b6250bc5dfbe1f0fe4c84cc1b778ce/addons/web/models/models.py#L698-L726. On the client, serializeDateTime also formats in UTC, see https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/8d80ed39a2b6250bc5dfbe1f0fe4c84cc1b778ce/addons/web/static/src/core/l10n/dates.js#L455-L462, so group.serverValue is the UTC-shifted string the server sent, e.g. "2025-01-01 08:00:00" for a Pacific-tz user on a 2025-year group.

read_progress_bar called _read_group directly, which returns the raw naive datetime out of date_trunc, see
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/8d80ed39a2b6250bc5dfbe1f0fe4c84cc1b778ce/odoo/orm/models.py#L1764, so its dict was keyed by str(datetime(2025, 1, 1, 0, 0)) = "2025-01-01 00:00:00". The UTC-formatted key the client looks up in _pbCounts[groupValue], see
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/8d80ed39a2b6250bc5dfbe1f0fe4c84cc1b778ce/addons/web/static/src/views/kanban/progress_bar_hook.js#L69, never matched, per-state counts stayed at zero, and the synthetic "Other" bucket with color "200" (grey) absorbed the whole group.count, see
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/8d80ed39a2b6250bc5dfbe1f0fe4c84cc1b778ce/addons/web/static/src/views/kanban/progress_bar_hook.js#L88, hence the uniform grey bar.

Non-date groupbys (many2one, selection, boolean) are unaffected because their keys are scalar ids / selection codes that round-trip identically on both sides. The "None" column also works because both sides emit the literal string "False".

The regression was introduced by d5a6e97abab04282c7a69093cd790b539a958241 when read_progress_bar was switched from self.read_group(...), whose output was pre-formatted the same way the client received it, to self._read_group(...)

Solution
Route read_progress_bar through formatted_read_group, the same method web_read_group uses to build groups for the client. Both sides now run through _web_read_group_groupby_formatter, so the keys are produced by the same code path and match by construction for every field type, including date/datetime granularities.

formatted_read_group wraps relational and date/datetime groupby values as (id, display_name) / (utc_str, label) tuples, so the adapt helper unwraps the first element to restore the scalar key shape the result dict expects.

opw-6148736

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#261024

Currently, an error occurs when loading sample data in work orders.

**Steps to Reproduce:**

 - Install `mrp_workorder` without demo data.
 - Go to `Settings` > `Users & Companies` > `Groups` and open the `Manage Work Order Operations` group.
 - Add the `administrator` to the `users` list.
 - Open the `Shop Floor` and, if you see `Activate your Work center`, click on it and then click `Configure Later`.
 - Click on `Load Samples`.

`AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'id'`

After this [recent commit], sample data loading in mrp_workorder started linking Quality Points 
to a specific BOM line [1] using the provided sample data [2]. However, some sample entries 
contain None [3] as the bom_line, which raises the error [1].

This commit ensures that the BOM line ID is only set when a BOM line exists.

[recent commit]: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/commit/c2a3e89c3ff5bc201bf7307b3b7d322d7bd0eecc

[1]- https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/0b08377e4e485a1b1da347dd2384b6c17bbb089e/mrp_workorder/models/mrp_production.py#L233

[2]: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/0b08377e4e485a1b1da347dd2384b6c17bbb089e/mrp_workorder/models/mrp_production.py#L251

[3]: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/0b08377e4e485a1b1da347dd2384b6c17bbb089e/mrp_workorder/models/mrp_production.py#L242

sentry-7475493233

__

## Short functional explanation of the error
When for an employee with a Flexible schedule, we set a shift overlapping on two days. The attendance report displays twice the worked hours.

## Reproduction Steps
1. Create an employee with a flexible schedule and with Work Entry Source set at Planning.
2. Go to Planning. Create a Planning Slot for this employee from 9 pm to 5 am, then Send and Publish it.
3. Click on the Reporting tab > Planning / Attendance Analysis.

### Expected behavior
The total for this Month for this employee under the Planned Time field should be equal to 8 hours, which is the duration of the planning slot.

### Unexpected behavior
The total for this Month for this employee under the Planned Time field is equal to 16 hours.

## Origin of the issue
This report is a view, for which the SQL is defined starting this line: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/7362f1c5be7f496bdab660ed8fad37a6dd283616/planning_attendance/report/planning_attendance_analysis_report.py#L27 the issue stems from here:
https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/7362f1c5be7f496bdab660ed8fad37a6dd283616/planning_attendance/report/planning_attendance_analysis_report.py#L56 where we don't select distinct the planning entries based on their ID. As our shift overlaps 2 days, there will be only one entry for this shift in the `planning_slot`, but because of that, it will be duplicated.

__
opw-6146052

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#117128
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#115447

### Contains the following commits:

https://github.com/odoo/o-spreadsheet/commit/1dc7b420e5 [REL] 19.3.4 [Task: 0](https://www.odoo.com/odoo/2328/tasks/0)
https://github.com/odoo/o-spreadsheet/commit/9fcc001827 [FIX] color_picker: prevent gradient from opening when picking a custom color [Task: 6186050](https://www.odoo.com/odoo/2328/tasks/6186050)
https://github.com/odoo/o-spreadsheet/commit/8434bc3e93 [FIX] chart: cannot change chart type with gauge/scorecard [Task: 6179286](https://www.odoo.com/odoo/2328/tasks/6179286)
https://github.com/odoo/o-spreadsheet/commit/43a43780cc [FIX] named range: keep dropdown open on hover [Task: 6167171](https://www.odoo.com/odoo/2328/tasks/6167171)
https://github.com/odoo/o-spreadsheet/commit/a68a53df3e [FIX] composer: add flex-grow-1 to value container [Task: 6159426](https://www.odoo.com/odoo/2328/tasks/6159426)
https://github.com/odoo/o-spreadsheet/commit/9a27e65347 [IMP] packages: rolldown is released in 1.0.0 [](https://www.odoo.com/odoo/2328/tasks/)
https://github.com/odoo/o-spreadsheet/commit/35017e4aba [REL] 19.3.3 [Task: 0](https://www.odoo.com/odoo/2328/tasks/0)
https://github.com/odoo/o-spreadsheet/commit/02d9577708 [FIX] packages: update odoo dependencies [](https://www.odoo.com/odoo/2328/tasks/)
https://github.com/odoo/o-spreadsheet/commit/72ec725781 [FIX] package: package install is broken [Task: 0](https://www.odoo.com/odoo/2328/tasks/0)

Co-authored-by: Florian Damhaut (flda) <flda@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Anthony Hendrickx (anhe) <anhe@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Alexis Lacroix (laa) <laa@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Lucas Lefèvre (lul) <lul@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Adrien Minne (adrm) <adrm@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Ronak Mukeshbhai Bharadiya (rmbh) <rmbh@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Dhrutik Patel (dhrp) <dhrp@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Rémi Rahir (rar) <rar@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Pierre Rousseau (pro) <pro@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Vincent Schippefilt (vsc) <vsc@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Marceline Thomas (matho) <matho@odoo.com>

Issue:
Unreconciling a payment in a batch payment from a recurring invoice will cause an invoice for the next recurring period to be generated

Steps to reproduce:
1. Create and confirm a monthly recurring invoice
2. Create a payment for the invoice
3. Create a batch payment and add the payment created in step 2 then validate it
4. Create a bank statement line and reconcile it with the batch payment created in step 3
5. Unreconcile the payment from the invoice from the invoice form view
6. Notice that a draft invoice for the next month’s recurring invoice is created

Cause:
When unreconciling the payment from the invoice via the invoice form view, the method “delete_reconciled_line” is called. In the “account_accountant_batch_payment” override of that method, it will reset the invoice back to draft and repost it. However, when posting a recurring invoice, the default behavior is to create the invoice for the next recurrence period

Solution:
Adding a new context flag called “skip_recurring_copy” will prevent the next period’s recurring invoice from being generated when invoices are posted through “delete_reconciled_line”

opw-6158881

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#263991

Issue:
Unreconciling a payment in a batch payment from a recurring invoice will cause an invoice for the next recurring period to be generated

Steps to reproduce:
1. Create and confirm a monthly recurring invoice
2. Create a payment for the invoice
3. Create a batch payment and add the payment created in step 2 then validate it
4. Create a bank statement line and reconcile it with the batch payment created in step 3
5. Unreconcile the payment from the invoice from the invoice form view
6. Notice that a draft invoice for the next month’s recurring invoice is created

Cause:
When unreconciling the payment from the invoice via the invoice form view, the method “delete_reconciled_line” is called. In the “account_accountant_batch_payment” override of that method, it will reset the invoice back to draft and repost it. However, when posting a recurring invoice, the default behavior is to create the invoice for the next recurrence period

Solution:
Adding a new context flag called “skip_recurring_copy” will prevent the next period’s recurring invoice from being generated when invoices are posted through “delete_reconciled_line”

opw-6158881

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#117011

Issue:
When creating a payment with an early payment discount, on an invoice using a cash rounding with a strategy of “Modify tax amount”, the early payment discount lines on the payment journal entry will be far off from the correct amount

Steps to reproduce:
1. Create a sales tax for 8.1%
2. Create a cash rounding record for 0.05 as the rounding precision, “Modify tax amount” as the rounding strategy, and “Nearest” as the rounding method
3. Create a payment term with early payment discount of 2% if paid within 18 days. And reduced tax on early payment. With a due term of 100% 30 days after the invoice date
4. Create an invoice on 1/1 with a subtotal of 339.60 and the tax of 8.1% and add the cash rounding method and payment term created earlier
5. Create a payment for it 9 days later on 1/10 for the full amount after the early payment discount is applied

Cause:
tax_amounts is grabbing the amount for a certain tax from the last line on the invoice with the same tax_repartition_line_id. Usually there is only one tax line representing a certain tax on an invoice. However, when a cash rounding is applied to the invoice with a strategy of “Modify tax amount”, the cash rounding line that is created will also have the same tax_repartition_line_id. In that case, it will grab the amount on the cash rounding line instead of adding the first tax amount with the cash rounding line amount

Solution:
In tax_amounts, add to the accumulating value if a tax repartition line id already exists as a key otherwise, insert it into tax_amounts

opw-5998497

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#259025

Issue:
When a user takes a survey and loses their internet connection just as the form attempts to submit (e.g., during a timed survey's auto-submit), the survey becomes completely unresponsive. Even if the user reconnects, they are unable to submit their answers.

Steps to reproduce:
1. Start a survey that includes a time limit.
2. Disconnect your device from the internet just before the timer runs out.
3. Wait for the timer to reach zero, triggering the auto-submit.
4. Reconnect to the internet and attempt to click "Submit" manually.
5. The action is ignored and the form remains stuck.

Cause:
To prevent duplicate submissions, the form applies a "submitting" lock the moment a submission begins. If a network failure interrupts the process, the code execution halts abruptly. Because the process crashes before reaching the end of its routine, the lock is never removed, leaving the form permanently frozen.

Solution:
Guarantee that the submission lock is released regardless of the network request's outcome. By safely wrapping the submission sequence, the form will now always unlock itself even if an error interrupts the process. This allows the user to simply try submitting again once their connection is restored, while still letting the system report the initial network failure.

Task-5787410

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#249514

Steps to reproduce
1. Open any kanban view declaring a <progressbar> (e.g. Project > Tasks, or Field Service > My Tasks).
2. Group by a date or datetime field with a granularity (e.g. Creation Date: Year, planned_date_begin:day).
3. Have records spread across several groups with different state values (done, in progress, canceled, ...).
4. Observe the colored progress bar at the top of each column.

Issue
Every column's progress bar renders as a uniform grey block regardless of the actual state distribution of its records. The effect is visible only when grouping by a date/datetime field; grouping by stage or assignees still works.

The kanban relies on two separate RPCs whose keys must match: formatted_read_group (used by web_read_group) returns the columns the client stores, and the client uses each column's formatted groupby value as the lookup key; read_progress_bar returns a dict mapping that same key to per-state counts.

For a datetime group by with a time granularity,
formatted_read_group goes through _web_read_group_groupby_formatter, which localizes the naive timestamp in the user's timezone and then converts it to UTC before strftime, see
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/8d80ed39a2b6250bc5dfbe1f0fe4c84cc1b778ce/addons/web/models/models.py#L698-L726. On the client, serializeDateTime also formats in UTC, see https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/8d80ed39a2b6250bc5dfbe1f0fe4c84cc1b778ce/addons/web/static/src/core/l10n/dates.js#L455-L462, so group.serverValue is the UTC-shifted string the server sent, e.g. "2025-01-01 08:00:00" for a Pacific-tz user on a 2025-year group.

read_progress_bar called _read_group directly, which returns the raw naive datetime out of date_trunc, see
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/8d80ed39a2b6250bc5dfbe1f0fe4c84cc1b778ce/odoo/orm/models.py#L1764, so its dict was keyed by str(datetime(2025, 1, 1, 0, 0)) = "2025-01-01 00:00:00". The UTC-formatted key the client looks up in _pbCounts[groupValue], see
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/8d80ed39a2b6250bc5dfbe1f0fe4c84cc1b778ce/addons/web/static/src/views/kanban/progress_bar_hook.js#L69, never matched, per-state counts stayed at zero, and the synthetic "Other" bucket with color "200" (grey) absorbed the whole group.count, see
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/8d80ed39a2b6250bc5dfbe1f0fe4c84cc1b778ce/addons/web/static/src/views/kanban/progress_bar_hook.js#L88, hence the uniform grey bar.

Non-date groupbys (many2one, selection, boolean) are unaffected because their keys are scalar ids / selection codes that round-trip identically on both sides. The "None" column also works because both sides emit the literal string "False".

The regression was introduced by d5a6e97abab04282c7a69093cd790b539a958241 when read_progress_bar was switched from self.read_group(...), whose output was pre-formatted the same way the client received it, to self._read_group(...)

Solution
Route read_progress_bar through formatted_read_group, the same method web_read_group uses to build groups for the client. Both sides now run through _web_read_group_groupby_formatter, so the keys are produced by the same code path and match by construction for every field type, including date/datetime granularities.

formatted_read_group wraps relational and date/datetime groupby values as (id, display_name) / (utc_str, label) tuples, so the adapt helper unwraps the first element to restore the scalar key shape the result dict expects.

opw-6148736

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#261024

The content of an invoice's section lines is not aligned with the columns when the prices of the section are hidden and the country of origin is displayed in the invoice

Steps to reproduce:
1. Install account_intrastat module
2. Go to Invoicing > Customers > Products and create a new product with name "test" and in the Accounting tab, set the Country of Origin to Afghanistan
3. Go to Invoicing > Customers > Customers and change Acme Corporation's country to United Kingdom
4. Go to Invoicing > Customers > Invoices and create a new invoice for partner Acme Corporation, add a section line and in that section, add product "test"
5. Click on the three dots at the end of the section line and click on Hide Prices
6. Confirm the invoice and print it
7. The content of the section line in the invoice pdf are not aligned (the tax is in column Unit Price and the amount is in column Taxes)

Issue:
When a section is hidden, no column is added in the section to display the origin, resulting in a misalignment of the tax and the amount of the section

Solution:
Add a column for the origin country in hidden section lines and add the origin country in product lines of `_get_child_lines`

opw-6147929

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#264118
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#263499

The content of an invoice's section lines is not aligned with the columns when the prices of the section are hidden and the country of origin is displayed in the invoice

Steps to reproduce:
1. Install account_intrastat module
2. Go to Invoicing > Customers > Products and create a new product with name "test" and in the Accounting tab, set the Country of Origin to Afghanistan
3. Go to Invoicing > Customers > Customers and change Acme Corporation's country to United Kingdom
4. Go to Invoicing > Customers > Invoices and create a new invoice for partner Acme Corporation, add a section line and in that section, add product "test"
5. Click on the three dots at the end of the section line and click on Hide Prices
6. Confirm the invoice and print it
7. The content of the section line in the invoice pdf are not aligned (the tax is in column Unit Price and the amount is in column Taxes)

Issue:
When a section is hidden, no column is added in the section to display the origin, resulting in a misalignment of the tax and the amount of the section

Solution:
Add a column for the origin country in hidden section lines and add the origin country in product lines of `_get_child_lines`

opw-6147929

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#117092
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#115442

Issue:
Unreconciling a payment in a batch payment from a recurring invoice will cause an invoice for the next recurring period to be generated

Steps to reproduce:
1. Create and confirm a monthly recurring invoice
2. Create a payment for the invoice
3. Create a batch payment and add the payment created in step 2 then validate it
4. Create a bank statement line and reconcile it with the batch payment created in step 3
5. Unreconcile the payment from the invoice from the invoice form view
6. Notice that a draft invoice for the next month’s recurring invoice is created

Cause:
When unreconciling the payment from the invoice via the invoice form view, the method “delete_reconciled_line” is called. In the “account_accountant_batch_payment” override of that method, it will reset the invoice back to draft and repost it. However, when posting a recurring invoice, the default behavior is to create the invoice for the next recurrence period

Solution:
Adding a new context flag called “skip_recurring_copy” will prevent the next period’s recurring invoice from being generated when invoices are posted through “delete_reconciled_line”

opw-6158881

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#263991

Issue:
Unreconciling a payment in a batch payment from a recurring invoice will cause an invoice >

Steps to reproduce:
1. Create and confirm a monthly recurring invoice
2. Create a payment for the invoice
3. Create a batch payment and add the payment created in step 2 then validate it
4. Create a bank statement line and reconcile it with the batch payment created in step 3
5. Unreconcile the payment from the invoice from the invoice form view
6. Notice that a draft invoice for the next month’s recurring invoice is created

Cause:
When unreconciling the payment from the invoice via the invoice form view, the method “delete_reconciled_line” is called. In the “account_accountant_batch_payment” override of that method, it will reset the invoice back to draft and repost it. However, when posting a recurring invoice, the default behavior is to create the invoice for the next recurrence period

Solution:
Adding a new context flag called “skip_recurring_copy” will prevent the next period’s recurring invoice from being generated when invoices are posted through “delete_reconciled_line”

opw-6158881

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#117011

Issue:
When creating a payment with an early payment discount, on an invoice using a cash rounding with a strategy of “Modify tax amount”, the early payment discount lines on the payment journal entry will be far off from the correct amount

Steps to reproduce:
1. Create a sales tax for 8.1%
2. Create a cash rounding record for 0.05 as the rounding precision, “Modify tax amount” as the rounding strategy, and “Nearest” as the rounding method
3. Create a payment term with early payment discount of 2% if paid within 18 days. And reduced tax on early payment. With a due term of 100% 30 days after the invoice date
4. Create an invoice on 1/1 with a subtotal of 339.60 and the tax of 8.1% and add the cash rounding method and payment term created earlier
5. Create a payment for it 9 days later on 1/10 for the full amount after the early payment discount is applied

Cause:
tax_amounts is grabbing the amount for a certain tax from the last line on the invoice with the same tax_repartition_line_id. Usually there is only one tax line representing a certain tax on an invoice. However, when a cash rounding is applied to the invoice with a strategy of “Modify tax amount”, the cash rounding line that is created will also have the same tax_repartition_line_id. In that case, it will grab the amount on the cash rounding line instead of adding the first tax amount with the cash rounding line amount

Solution:
In tax_amounts, add to the accumulating value if a tax repartition line id already exists as a key otherwise, insert it into tax_amounts

opw-5998497

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#259025

Steps to reproduce
1. Open any kanban view declaring a <progressbar> (e.g. Project > Tasks, or Field Service > My Tasks).
2. Group by a date or datetime field with a granularity (e.g. Creation Date: Year, planned_date_begin:day).
3. Have records spread across several groups with different state values (done, in progress, canceled, ...).
4. Observe the colored progress bar at the top of each column.

Issue
Every column's progress bar renders as a uniform grey block regardless of the actual state distribution of its records. The effect is visible only when grouping by a date/datetime field; grouping by stage or assignees still works.

The kanban relies on two separate RPCs whose keys must match: formatted_read_group (used by web_read_group) returns the columns the client stores, and the client uses each column's formatted groupby value as the lookup key; read_progress_bar returns a dict mapping that same key to per-state counts.

For a datetime group by with a time granularity,
formatted_read_group goes through _web_read_group_groupby_formatter, which localizes the naive timestamp in the user's timezone and then converts it to UTC before strftime, see
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/8d80ed39a2b6250bc5dfbe1f0fe4c84cc1b778ce/addons/web/models/models.py#L698-L726. On the client, serializeDateTime also formats in UTC, see https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/8d80ed39a2b6250bc5dfbe1f0fe4c84cc1b778ce/addons/web/static/src/core/l10n/dates.js#L455-L462, so group.serverValue is the UTC-shifted string the server sent, e.g. "2025-01-01 08:00:00" for a Pacific-tz user on a 2025-year group.

read_progress_bar called _read_group directly, which returns the raw naive datetime out of date_trunc, see
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/8d80ed39a2b6250bc5dfbe1f0fe4c84cc1b778ce/odoo/orm/models.py#L1764, so its dict was keyed by str(datetime(2025, 1, 1, 0, 0)) = "2025-01-01 00:00:00". The UTC-formatted key the client looks up in _pbCounts[groupValue], see
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/8d80ed39a2b6250bc5dfbe1f0fe4c84cc1b778ce/addons/web/static/src/views/kanban/progress_bar_hook.js#L69, never matched, per-state counts stayed at zero, and the synthetic "Other" bucket with color "200" (grey) absorbed the whole group.count, see
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/8d80ed39a2b6250bc5dfbe1f0fe4c84cc1b778ce/addons/web/static/src/views/kanban/progress_bar_hook.js#L88, hence the uniform grey bar.

Non-date groupbys (many2one, selection, boolean) are unaffected because their keys are scalar ids / selection codes that round-trip identically on both sides. The "None" column also works because both sides emit the literal string "False".

The regression was introduced by d5a6e97abab04282c7a69093cd790b539a958241 when read_progress_bar was switched from self.read_group(...), whose output was pre-formatted the same way the client received it, to self._read_group(...)

Solution
Route read_progress_bar through formatted_read_group, the same method web_read_group uses to build groups for the client. Both sides now run through _web_read_group_groupby_formatter, so the keys are produced by the same code path and match by construction for every field type, including date/datetime granularities.

formatted_read_group wraps relational and date/datetime groupby values as (id, display_name) / (utc_str, label) tuples, so the adapt helper unwraps the first element to restore the scalar key shape the result dict expects.

opw-6148736

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#261024

Issue:
When a user takes a survey and loses their internet connection just as the form attempts to submit (e.g., during a timed survey's auto-submit), the survey becomes completely unresponsive. Even if the user reconnects, they are unable to submit their answers.

Steps to reproduce:
1. Start a survey that includes a time limit.
2. Disconnect your device from the internet just before the timer runs out.
3. Wait for the timer to reach zero, triggering the auto-submit.
4. Reconnect to the internet and attempt to click "Submit" manually.
5. The action is ignored and the form remains stuck.

Cause:
To prevent duplicate submissions, the form applies a "submitting" lock the moment a submission begins. If a network failure interrupts the process, the code execution halts abruptly. Because the process crashes before reaching the end of its routine, the lock is never removed, leaving the form permanently frozen.

Solution:
Guarantee that the submission lock is released regardless of the network request's outcome. By safely wrapping the submission sequence, the form will now always unlock itself even if an error interrupts the process. This allows the user to simply try submitting again once their connection is restored, while still letting the system report the initial network failure.

Task-5787410

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#249514

Since this [PR](https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/252738),
The test `show looking for help duration in the sidebar` was failing due to 
a race condition.

With the following error:
```
expected at least 1 element after 200ms and found 0 elements: 5 matching 
:text(Visitor #1) (1 element containing selector :text(Visitor #1) > 0 text 
elements)
```

The test was going through the join flow, which triggers `discuss.channel/joined`
and then `fetchChannel()`. Since `fetchStoreData()` is debounced, the resulting
`/mail/data` fetch could race with the later `/im_livechat/session/update_status`
call and the corresponding bus/store updates. Because the test was asserting the
timer while those async updates were still settling, it could sometimes
observe an intermediate client state and fail.

This commit fixes the race condition to wait for the `/mail/data` RPC
to fully complete, before clicking the `Looking for help` button.
This ensures the store is fully settled before the LFH timer assertion,
making the test deterministic.

runbot-[242278](https://runbot.odoo.com/odoo/error/242278)

---
I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr

When a receipt dest location or delivery source location get archived, the corresponding move may not be taken into account when computing the total_value / avg_cost at date.

OPW-6099192

---

### Test result without fix

```
2026-04-23 06:30:34,016 10516 INFO oes_test_19 odoo.addons.stock_account.tests.test_stockvaluation: Starting TestStockValuation.test_archived_location_valuation ... 
2026-04-23 06:30:34,255 10516 INFO oes_test_19 odoo.addons.stock_account.tests.test_stockvaluation: ====================================================================== 
2026-04-23 06:30:34,255 10516 ERROR oes_test_19 odoo.addons.stock_account.tests.test_stockvaluation: FAIL: TestStockValuation.test_archived_location_valuation
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/home/odoo/Odoo/src/19.0/odoo/addons/stock_account/tests/test_stockvaluation.py", line 3326, in test_archived_location_valuation
    self.assertEqual(self.product_avco.with_context(to_date=date_1).avg_cost, 10)
AssertionError: 20.0 != 10
 ```

---
I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#260922

Event tickets show a struck-through original price even when a "Fixed Price" pricelist rule is applied, making it incorrectly appear as a discount. This is inconsistent with eCommerce shop behavior.

### Steps to reproduce

1. Create an event with a paid ticket (e.g., 100 EUR).
2. Create a pricelist with a "Fixed Price" rule for that ticket (e.g., 80 EUR).
3. Open the event registration page.
4. The 100 EUR appears struck-through next to 80 EUR.

### Cause

Odoo's website only shows a struck-through original price for discount rules, not fixed price rules. By design, a fixed price replaces the original rather than reducing it. However, the event registration page used a simplified check: it compared the final price to the original and assumed any difference was a discount. This ignored the rule type, incorrectly flagging fixed price rules as discounts.

### Fix Rationale

A new helper method on the event ticket model now queries the applied pricelist rule to determine if it qualifies as a discount.

opw-5993477

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#264240
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#263586

### Contains the following commits:

https://github.com/odoo/o-spreadsheet/commit/b6a68b89c1 [REL] 19.1.20 [Task: 0](https://www.odoo.com/odoo/2328/tasks/0)
https://github.com/odoo/o-spreadsheet/commit/9087d404c4 [FIX] color_picker: prevent gradient from opening when picking a custom color [Task: 6186050](https://www.odoo.com/odoo/2328/tasks/6186050)
https://github.com/odoo/o-spreadsheet/commit/6255eb07a6 [IMP] packages: rolldown is released in 1.0.0 [](https://www.odoo.com/odoo/2328/tasks/)
https://github.com/odoo/o-spreadsheet/commit/aea4a8c55f [REL] 19.1.19 [Task: 0](https://www.odoo.com/odoo/2328/tasks/0)
https://github.com/odoo/o-spreadsheet/commit/addcd227d8 [FIX] packages: update odoo dependencies [](https://www.odoo.com/odoo/2328/tasks/)
https://github.com/odoo/o-spreadsheet/commit/5e333513e4 [FIX] package: update package-lock [](https://www.odoo.com/odoo/2328/tasks/)
https://github.com/odoo/o-spreadsheet/commit/dedcb6a12c [FIX] package: package install is broken [Task: 0](https://www.odoo.com/odoo/2328/tasks/0)
https://github.com/odoo/o-spreadsheet/commit/a8493394cc [REL] 19.1.18 [Task: 0](https://www.odoo.com/odoo/2328/tasks/0)
https://github.com/odoo/o-spreadsheet/commit/e267f5db92 [FIX] package: husky should run at post install [Task: 0](https://www.odoo.com/odoo/2328/tasks/0)
https://github.com/odoo/o-spreadsheet/commit/1d4311e3d2 [FIX] workflow: fix the tag definition [Task: 0](https://www.odoo.com/odoo/2328/tasks/0)
https://github.com/odoo/o-spreadsheet/commit/dfff07841c [FIX] Workflow: fix missing permission to use OpenID Connect [Task: 0](https://www.odoo.com/odoo/2328/tasks/0)
https://github.com/odoo/o-spreadsheet/commit/2e87404919 [FIX] workflow: Split the workflow in parallel jobs [Task: 0](https://www.odoo.com/odoo/2328/tasks/0)

Co-authored-by: Florian Damhaut (flda) <flda@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Anthony Hendrickx (anhe) <anhe@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Alexis Lacroix (laa) <laa@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Lucas Lefèvre (lul) <lul@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Adrien Minne (adrm) <adrm@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Ronak Mukeshbhai Bharadiya (rmbh) <rmbh@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Dhrutik Patel (dhrp) <dhrp@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Rémi Rahir (rar) <rar@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Pierre Rousseau (pro) <pro@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Vincent Schippefilt (vsc) <vsc@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Marceline Thomas (matho) <matho@odoo.com>

The `show looking for help duration in the sidebar` test has been flaky since [1].

The root cause is that the agent joins at the final step, resetting the state to in_progress, then immediately switches it back to `looking_for_help`.

 This creates several race conditions:
- Bus notifications from `join_livechat_need_help`, new message events, and any other notification carrying stale state data.
- Channel state fetched after the user joins via `/mail/data`.

The mock server makes these races hard to guard against: notifications arrive one by one, and there's no UI signal that guarantees all stale data has been processed.

This commit splits the test to preserve coverage while avoiding the problematic rapid state transition.

runbot-242278

[1]: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/252738

Description of the issue/feature this PR addresses:

Current behavior before PR:

Desired behavior after PR is merged:




---
I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr

Steps to reproduce
1. In a French company with Intrastat enabled, set up a product whose commodity code has a CN supplementary unit (e.g. 8802 30 00, "p/st") and set `intrastat_supplementary_unit_amount` on it.
2. Post EU customer invoices for that product.
3. Export the DEBWEB2 XML from the Intrastat report.

Issue
The FR export collapses engine rows a second time in `_group_items`, because the DEBWEB2 format groups more aggressively than the SQL. The aggregator only declares `value` and `weight`: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/6ae5d3df6e9305416e4d6f74259cd01753025f42/l10n_fr_intrastat/models/account_intrastat_report.py#L308-L313 Items are then rebuilt as `dict(zip(grouping_key, key_tuple)) | grouped_item_values`. `SU_code` survives (it is in the grouping key), but the numeric `supplementary_units` is in neither side and is silently dropped as soon as two engine rows merge. The template then skips the element because of its `t-if="item.get('supplementary_units')"` guard: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/6ae5d3df6e9305416e4d6f74259cd01753025f42/l10n_fr_intrastat/data/intrastat_export.xml#L61

opw-6139657

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#117033

Issue:
When creating a payment with an early payment discount, on an invoice using a cash rounding with a strategy of “Modify tax amount”, the early payment discount lines on the payment journal entry will be far off from the correct amount

Steps to reproduce:
1. Create a sales tax for 8.1%
2. Create a cash rounding record for 0.05 as the rounding precision, “Modify tax amount” as the rounding strategy, and “Nearest” as the rounding method
3. Create a payment term with early payment discount of 2% if paid within 18 days. And reduced tax on early payment. With a due term of 100% 30 days after the invoice date
4. Create an invoice on 1/1 with a subtotal of 339.60 and the tax of 8.1% and add the cash rounding method and payment term created earlier
5. Create a payment for it 9 days later on 1/10 for the full amount after the early payment discount is applied

Cause:
tax_amounts is grabbing the amount for a certain tax from the last line on the invoice with the same tax_repartition_line_id. Usually there is only one tax line representing a certain tax on an invoice. However, when a cash rounding is applied to the invoice with a strategy of “Modify tax amount”, the cash rounding line that is created will also have the same tax_repartition_line_id. In that case, it will grab the amount on the cash rounding line instead of adding the first tax amount with the cash rounding line amount

Solution:
In tax_amounts, add to the accumulating value if a tax repartition line id already exists as a key otherwise, insert it into tax_amounts

opw-5998497

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#259025

Steps to reproduce
1. Open any kanban view declaring a <progressbar> (e.g. Project > Tasks, or Field Service > My Tasks).
2. Group by a date or datetime field with a granularity (e.g. Creation Date: Year, planned_date_begin:day).
3. Have records spread across several groups with different state values (done, in progress, canceled, ...).
4. Observe the colored progress bar at the top of each column.

Issue
Every column's progress bar renders as a uniform grey block regardless of the actual state distribution of its records. The effect is visible only when grouping by a date/datetime field; grouping by stage or assignees still works.

The kanban relies on two separate RPCs whose keys must match: formatted_read_group (used by web_read_group) returns the columns the client stores, and the client uses each column's formatted groupby value as the lookup key; read_progress_bar returns a dict mapping that same key to per-state counts.

For a datetime group by with a time granularity,
formatted_read_group goes through _web_read_group_groupby_formatter, which localizes the naive timestamp in the user's timezone and then converts it to UTC before strftime, see
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/8d80ed39a2b6250bc5dfbe1f0fe4c84cc1b778ce/addons/web/models/models.py#L698-L726. On the client, serializeDateTime also formats in UTC, see https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/8d80ed39a2b6250bc5dfbe1f0fe4c84cc1b778ce/addons/web/static/src/core/l10n/dates.js#L455-L462, so group.serverValue is the UTC-shifted string the server sent, e.g. "2025-01-01 08:00:00" for a Pacific-tz user on a 2025-year group.

read_progress_bar called _read_group directly, which returns the raw naive datetime out of date_trunc, see
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/8d80ed39a2b6250bc5dfbe1f0fe4c84cc1b778ce/odoo/orm/models.py#L1764, so its dict was keyed by str(datetime(2025, 1, 1, 0, 0)) = "2025-01-01 00:00:00". The UTC-formatted key the client looks up in _pbCounts[groupValue], see
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/8d80ed39a2b6250bc5dfbe1f0fe4c84cc1b778ce/addons/web/static/src/views/kanban/progress_bar_hook.js#L69, never matched, per-state counts stayed at zero, and the synthetic "Other" bucket with color "200" (grey) absorbed the whole group.count, see
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/8d80ed39a2b6250bc5dfbe1f0fe4c84cc1b778ce/addons/web/static/src/views/kanban/progress_bar_hook.js#L88, hence the uniform grey bar.

Non-date groupbys (many2one, selection, boolean) are unaffected because their keys are scalar ids / selection codes that round-trip identically on both sides. The "None" column also works because both sides emit the literal string "False".

The regression was introduced by d5a6e97abab04282c7a69093cd790b539a958241 when read_progress_bar was switched from self.read_group(...), whose output was pre-formatted the same way the client received it, to self._read_group(...)

Solution
Route read_progress_bar through formatted_read_group, the same method web_read_group uses to build groups for the client. Both sides now run through _web_read_group_groupby_formatter, so the keys are produced by the same code path and match by construction for every field type, including date/datetime granularities.

formatted_read_group wraps relational and date/datetime groupby values as (id, display_name) / (utc_str, label) tuples, so the adapt helper unwraps the first element to restore the scalar key shape the result dict expects.

opw-6148736

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#261024

Steps to reproduce
1. In a French company with Intrastat enabled, set up a product whose commodity code has a CN supplementary unit (e.g. 8802 30 00, "p/st") and set `intrastat_supplementary_unit_amount` on it.
2. Post EU customer invoices for that product.
3. Export the DEBWEB2 XML from the Intrastat report.

Issue
The FR export collapses engine rows a second time in `_group_items`, because the DEBWEB2 format groups more aggressively than the SQL. The aggregator only declares `value` and `weight`: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/6ae5d3df6e9305416e4d6f74259cd01753025f42/l10n_fr_intrastat/models/account_intrastat_report.py#L308-L313 Items are then rebuilt as `dict(zip(grouping_key, key_tuple)) | grouped_item_values`. `SU_code` survives (it is in the grouping key), but the numeric `supplementary_units` is in neither side and is silently dropped as soon as two engine rows merge. The template then skips the element because of its `t-if="item.get('supplementary_units')"` guard: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/6ae5d3df6e9305416e4d6f74259cd01753025f42/l10n_fr_intrastat/data/intrastat_export.xml#L61

opw-6139657

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#117033

- Attendance checkout
    - Step to reproduce: with attendance installed and an employee checked in, archive that employee by HR user. If missing attendance rights, the employee will be archived but not checked out from its ongoing attendance.
    - Cause: if no role set for Attendance (default), no permission to update the employee attendance while archiving.
    - Solution: using sudo method so that any user with sufficient rights to archive an employee, can trigger check out of the corresponding attendance.

- Planning access error (fixed in 18.0 by https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/219395)
    - Step to reproduce: with attendance and planning installed, archive an employee having planning slots. If missing planning rights, an access error is raised
    - Cause: on employee archive, the corresponding planning.slots are updated and some fields recomputed with insufficient rights.
    - Solution: using sudo method for recompute.

Task: 6131692

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#264101
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#260566

### Steps to reproduce:
- Download 'Sales', 'Accounting', and 'l10n_sa_edi' modules
- Settings > Accounting > Rounding Method > Enable global rounding
- Create sale order with 8 lines at 29.7 each with 15% taxes (triggers rounding precision issues)
- Create and confirm 100% downpayment invoice
- Deliver, then create final invoice with downpayment lines
- Call `_l10n_sa_get_prepaid_amount()` on final invoice
> Tax amount was calculated as 35.67 instead of correct 35.64

### Cause of Issue:
The prepaid amount calculation was summing pre-rounded `tax_amount_currency` values from individual downpayment lines (4.45 + 4.46 + 4.46... = 35.67), instead of summing unrounded `raw_tax_amount_currency` values (4.455 × 8 = 35.64) to calculate `tax_amount`. https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/27930ae41a5f03bd499983109de7f632472c3650/addons/l10n_sa_edi/models/account_edi_xml_ubl_21_zatca.py#L227-L240

This violates Odoo's [recent change](https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/180062) in `round_globally` pattern which states:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/8a88756bed194910bc5a47e93f0e29610dbeee1f/addons/account/models/account_tax.py#L2208

### Fix:
Ensure cumulative rounding errors are avoided and correct global rounding is applied.

opw-5881564

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#263915
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#261278

Pre-requisite:
---------------------------------------
1. Install the Time Off module
2. Create a new company (e.g, Test Company)
3. Create New Timeoff Type: 
    * Ensure a default company is set (e.g, YourCompany)
4. Duplicate the created Time off type: 
    * Remove (Copy) from the name so both records share the same name
    * Clear the Company field on the duplicated record

Steps to reproduce:
---------------------------------------
1. Go to Time Off type which has no Company
2. Allocation Smart button > New
3. Set allocation for some days (e. g, 10 Days) > Approve allocation
4. Now, click on Employee > Time Off smart button
5.  On the Dashboard, you can see allocated leaves
6. Click on any day to create a Time Off Request

Observation:
---------------------------------------
The allocated Time Off Type is not available in the request wizard, even though allocation exists.

Issue:
---------------------------------------
When natively computing allocation statistics for the UI, the `_compute_leaves` loops through a pre-fetched `data_days` structure and incorrectly extracts the calculation metrics by matching the `holiday_status.name` string via a list comprehension lookup index (`item[0]`).
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/73d73c5c6606e0b34c754bfc4de035840951dd3b/addons/hr_holidays/models/hr_leave_type.py#L288-L294

If Time Off Type A and Time Off Type B share the name 'Generic Leave', the list comprehension evaluates sequentially and forcefully maps the dictionary of whichever version structurally sits first in the memory sequence directly onto both overlapping identifiers simultaneously!

Solution:
---------------------------------------
Directly match records using their unique ID.
This ensures that each database record always retrieves its own correct data, preventing any mix-up or accidental sharing of values between records that may have the same name.

opw-6105759

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#264104
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#261680

Steps to reproduce
1. In a French company with Intrastat enabled, set up a product whose commodity code has a CN supplementary unit (e.g. 8802 30 00, "p/st") and set `intrastat_supplementary_unit_amount` on it.
2. Post EU customer invoices for that product.
3. Export the DEBWEB2 XML from the Intrastat report.

Issue
The FR export collapses engine rows a second time in `_group_items`, because the DEBWEB2 format groups more aggressively than the SQL. The aggregator only declares `value` and `weight`: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/6ae5d3df6e9305416e4d6f74259cd01753025f42/l10n_fr_intrastat/models/account_intrastat_report.py#L308-L313 Items are then rebuilt as `dict(zip(grouping_key, key_tuple)) | grouped_item_values`. `SU_code` survives (it is in the grouping key), but the numeric `supplementary_units` is in neither side and is silently dropped as soon as two engine rows merge. The template then skips the element because of its `t-if="item.get('supplementary_units')"` guard: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/6ae5d3df6e9305416e4d6f74259cd01753025f42/l10n_fr_intrastat/data/intrastat_export.xml#L61

opw-6139657

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#117033

**Problem:**
When a project analytic budget is revised, the project update description shows an inflated total budget — the sum of both the original and the revised amounts — instead of reflecting only the active (confirmed) revision.

**Steps to reproduce:**
1. Create a project with an analytic account
2. Create an analytic budget of $10,000 and confirm it
3. Create a revision of that budget for $15,000 and confirm it
4. Create a new project update
5. The update shows "$25,000" as the total budget instead of "$15,000"

**Current behavior:**
The project update displays the sum of all budget revisions ($25,000), regardless of their state.

**Expected behavior:**
Only the active confirmed budget ($15,000) should be used.

**Cause of the issue:**
`_compute_budget` queries all `budget.line` records matching the project's analytic account without filtering by the parent `budget.analytic` state. When a budget is revised, the original transitions to state `revised` while the new one becomes `confirmed`. Because `_compute_budget` has no state filter, it sums both, producing an inflated `total_budget_amount`. This field is then used in the project update template to compute the displayed budget total and percentage. By contrast, `_get_budget_items` — used for the detail rows — already applies `state in ['confirmed', 'done']`, so the two methods were inconsistent.

**Fix:**
Applying the same state filter to `_compute_budget` as already present in `_get_budget_items` ensures both methods draw from the same set of active budgets, keeping the project update totals consistent with the budget detail rows.

opw-6128855

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#115285

Currently an error occurs when the user removes the Source Entity Id Type on Super Contributions.

**Steps to Reproduce:**
 - Install `l10n_au_hr_payroll_account` with demo data.
 - Switch to an `Australian` company.
 - Go to `Payroll` > `Reporting` > `Australia` > `Super Contributions`.
 - Open an existing record or create a new one.
 - Remove the `Source Entity Id Type` value and click anywhere.

`ValueError: Compute method failed to assign l10n_au.super.stream(<NewId origin=1>,).source_entity_id`

After [change] in the selection field behavior, when the user removes the Source Entity Id 
Type, the compute method is triggered to compute the Source Entity ID. However, the 
condition in the compute method is not match, so no value is assigned. As a result, 
the method fails and raises an error.

This commit ensures that if the condition is not match, the Source Entity ID is explicitly 
set to False.

[1]- https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/9d523d7aabffda277e1ef734caf2b0e434545dca/l10n_au_hr_payroll_account/models/l10n_au_super_stream.py#L61-L65

[change]: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/214422/changes/8d2a42ac419fdf7943a0c11beb8c5de6c6f85bef

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#115466

A traceback occurs when sending an invoice to Peru UBL if a combo product
invoice line does not have any taxes applied.

Steps to reproduce the error:
- Install ``l10n_pe_edi`` module with demo data
- Switch to PE Company
- Create an invoice > Add a Office Combo product > unset the taxes > Confirm
- Process now

https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/d7f71a68fbd5ff9c7cd52f96e1616671a6b8d77c/l10n_pe_edi/models/account_edi_xml_ubl_pe.py#L549-L552
Here, the ``grouping_key`` becomes ``None`` when no taxes are present on the invoice line.
Normally, invoices without taxes are restricted at [1],
but combo products are excluded from this validation at [2].
As a result, combo product lines without taxes bypass the restriction and trigger a traceback.

[1]: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/d7f71a68fbd5ff9c7cd52f96e1616671a6b8d77c/l10n_pe_edi/models/account_edi_format.py#L928-L929

[2]: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/42b8852df9b323984364c41a13cf27d19fbe04a7/addons/account/models/account_move_line.py#L3433-L3434

sentry-7430552834

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#117365
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#114798

The content of an invoice's section lines is not aligned with the columns when the prices of the section are hidden and the country of origin is displayed in the invoice

Steps to reproduce:
1. Install account_intrastat module
2. Go to Invoicing > Customers > Products and create a new product with name "test" and in the Accounting tab, set the Country of Origin to Afghanistan
3. Go to Invoicing > Customers > Customers and change Acme Corporation's country to United Kingdom
4. Go to Invoicing > Customers > Invoices and create a new invoice for partner Acme Corporation, add a section line and in that section, add product "test"
5. Click on the three dots at the end of the section line and click on Hide Prices
6. Confirm the invoice and print it
7. The content of the section line in the invoice pdf are not aligned (the tax is in column Unit Price and the amount is in column Taxes)

Issue:
When a section is hidden, no column is added in the section to display the origin, resulting in a misalignment of the tax and the amount of the section

Solution:
Add a column for the origin country in hidden section lines and add the origin country in product lines of `_get_child_lines`

opw-6147929

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#117092
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#115442

Steps to Reproduce (Fresh Database):
--------------------------------------
1. Install `Manufacturing` (mrp) and `PLM` (mrp_plm) modules
2. Create a product > New -- Name: "Test Product" > Save
3. Create BoM v1
   - Go to Manufacturing > Products > Bills of Materials > New --Product: Test Product
   - Add component: any
4. Create and apply ECO 1 on BoM v1
   - Go to PLM > ECOs > New-- Product: Test Product | Apply on: Bill of Materials
   - BoM: Test Product (v1) > Confirm > Apply Changes
   - This creates BoM v2 (previous_bom_id = BoM v1)
5. Create and apply ECO 2 on BoM v2
   - Same as step 4 but select BoM v2
   - This creates BoM v3 (previous_bom_id = BoM v2)
6. Create a separate unrelated BoM for the same product
   - Go to Manufacturing > Bills of Materials > New
   - Product: Test Product | Component: "Component B" > Save
7. Create ECO 3 on the separate BoM
   - Go to PLM > ECOs > New - Product: Test Product | Apply on: Bill of Materials
   - BoM: select the separate BoM from step 6 > Confirm

Observed Bug:
-------------
- Open BoM v3 > ECO(s) stat button shows count = 2
- Click the button > opens 3 records (ECO 3 incorrectly included)

Explain:- 
----------
The ECO stat button on the BoM form was showing a mismatched count vs
the actual records opened when clicking it. This happened because
[button_mrp_eco](https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/55bfd499660d3eda0abfc9e8ed8c9a2befbd394b/mrp_plm/models/mrp_bom.py#L56) was using all keys from [_get_previous_boms](https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/55bfd499660d3eda0abfc9e8ed8c9a2befbd394b/mrp_plm/models/mrp_bom.py#L67)() as the
domain, which includes BoMs from unrelated lineages of the same product
template, while [_compute_eco_data](https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/55bfd499660d3eda0abfc9e8ed8c9a2befbd394b/mrp_plm/models/mrp_bom.py#L20) only counts ECOs belonging to the
current BoM's version lineage.

Fixed by filtering the domain to only include BoM IDs whose lineage set
contains the current BoM ID, making the opened records consistent with
the displayed count.

Before Fix
<img width="1901" height="875" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/3208aed5-ebd3-47a3-a457-a7d61b7743cb" />

```
In [24]: labo = self.env['mrp.bom'].browse(710)
In [25]: previous_boms_mapping = labo._get_previous_boms()
In [26]: Test = ['&', ('bom_id', 'in', list(previous_boms_mapping.keys())), ('type', '=', 'bom')]
In [27]: Test
Out[27]:
['&',
 ('bom_id',
  'in',
  [710,
   1991,
   2049,
   1913,
   1840,
   1823,
   1676,
   1759,
   1794,
   1651,
   1604,
   1544,
   1537,
   1527,
   1506,
   1460,
   1265,
   1259,
   1196,
   1221,
   1223,
   1060,
   1029,
   960,
   858,
   850,
   791,
   739,
   723,
   698]),
 ('type', '=', 'bom')]
```

With My Fix
<img width="1824" height="947" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/0d68fdbc-7e42-4ce4-a326-2fb030ba1d06" />

```
In [15]: labo = self.env['mrp.bom'].browse(710)
In [16]: previous_boms_mapping = labo._get_previous_boms()
In [17]: previous_boms_mapping
Out[17]:
{710: {710},
 1991: set(),
 2049: set(),
 1913: set(),
 1840: set(),
 1823: set(),
 1676: set(),
 1759: set(),
 1794: set(),
 1651: set(),
 1604: set(),
 1544: set(),
 1537: set(),
 1527: set(),
 1506: set(),
 1460: set(),
 1265: set(),
 1259: set(),
 1196: set(),
 1221: set(),
 1223: set(),
 1060: set(),
 1029: set(),
 960: set(),
 858: set(),
 850: set(),
 791: set(),
 739: set(),
 723: set(),
 698: {710}}
In [18]: relevant_bom_ids = [
    ...:     bom_id
    ...:     for bom_id, current_bom_set in previous_boms_mapping.items()
    ...:     if labo.id in current_bom_set
    ...: ]
In [19]: relevant_bom_ids
Out[19]: [710, 698]
```

Task-6065020

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#117149
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#114039

Steps to reproduce
1. Enable "Batch Account Move Lines" in the Payroll settings.
2. Configure two employees' versions with an analytic distribution on the
   same analytic account but with different percentages (e.g. {acc: 50}
   for the first employee and {acc: 70} for the second).
3. Generate a payslip run containing both employees and validate it.

Issue
The generated account move aggregates the two payslips into a single
line whose analytic_distribution matches only the last employee being
processed; the other employee's percentage is silently lost.

`_get_existing_lines` decides whether an incoming line can merge into an
already accumulated one. When the incoming line has an analytic
distribution, the merge condition delegates to
`_check_partially_matching_accounts`:

https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/e4a1326c7a8a74da7970aeaa9900c19d01634e31/hr_payroll_account/models/hr_payslip.py#L254-L271
https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/e4a1326c7a8a74da7970aeaa9900c19d01634e31/hr_payroll_account/models/hr_payslip.py#L273-L283

That helper returns True as soon as any analytic account of the new
line appears anywhere in the existing line's distribution dict, without
comparing percentages. Two distributions such as {acc: 50} and
{acc: 70} share the same account, so the helper returns True, the
lines are merged, and whichever distribution ends up on the merged line
overwrites the other — the total amount is correct but the analytic
split is wrong.

The logic introduced in commit https://github.com/odoo-dev/enterprise/commit/e40a3166286a6bc546e9543b935233d2a110dc52 successfully addressed merging for rule-level distributions
with composite keys (e.g., {'13,7,12': 40}). However, that implementation is overly inclusive for employee-specific distributions.
It fails to differentiate between cases where the same analytic account is utilized across various employees but with different percentage allocations.
Because it only checks for an account overlap rather than a perfect distributional match, it incorrectly aggregates distinct financial dimensions into a single journal line

Solution
Compare the full analytic_distribution dict by strict equality. Lines
merge only when the distribution is identical (same keys AND same
percentages), keeping the batch feature anonymizing identically
configured employees while preserving one line per distinct
distribution.

opw-6102508

> Commit 1:

[FIX] web_editor: prevent infinite bounce loop when clicking undo

Steps to reproduce:
1. Click an inner snippet without dragging it.
2. Observe that the "Drag building blocks here" section starts bouncing.
3. Drag any snippet and wait for the Undo option to appear.
4. Click Undo, then Redo.

Issue:
- This leads to an infinite bounce loop when using Undo/Redo.

Expected behavior:
- Infinite bouncing should not occur.

This PR prevents unnecessary history steps by disabling history tracking during this phase using `observerUnactive` and `observerActive`. This ensures that the editor does not record redundant changes, preventing infinite bounce loops.


> Commit 2:

[FIX] web_editor: fix dropdown options value

Steps to reproduce:
1. Go to the website and drag and drop the form snippet.
2. Change the action to 'Subscribe to Newsletter'.
3. Click on multi-checkbox field to view its options.

- Even after selecting an option, it remains in the dropdown, allowing multiple selections of the same option.

Expected behaviour:
- Once an option is selected, it should be removed from the dropdown.

Solution:
This PR removes the count from the display name, ensuring correct form behavior.

task-4583314

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#203454

**Steps to reproduce:**
* Install the *Accounting* module.
* Install localisation modules for two different regions:
  * *Belgium* (**l10n_be**)
  * *Luxembourg* (**l10n_lu**)
* Configure two companies, each assigned to one of the above regions.
* Create fiscal positions:
  * In the Belgium company, create a fiscal position for Luxembourg.
  * In the Luxembourg company, create a fiscal position for Belgium.
* Go to *Accounting > Configuration > Settings*. Enable *Inter-Company Transactions*. Enable synchronization of *Vendor Bills and Invoices* for both companies.
* Create an invoice in the Luxembourg company. Select a partner belonging to the Belgium company. Add a product with applicable taxes.

**Observed behavior:**
* A validation error is raised: 'This entry contains taxes that are not compatible with your fiscal position. Please check the country set in the fiscal position and in your tax configuration.'

**Cause:**
* During intercompany bill creation, a foreign fiscal position is applied before recomputing taxes.
* If no mapped foreign taxes exist, the system keeps domestic purchase taxes.
* This leads to a mismatch between taxes and fiscal position, triggering the validation error.

**Fix:**
* Add a safeguard in *_inter_company_create_invoices()*.
* After *_inter_company_sync_invoice_line_taxes()* recomputes taxes, *_inter_company_has_incompatible_fiscal_position_taxes()* checks whether the fiscal position is incompatible.
* If incompatible, the fiscal position is removed and taxes are recomputed without it.

opw-6103671

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#115085

Currently, after validating a transaction with a manual operation, the
aml resulting from the manual operation can still be selected and
matched with other transactions.

Steps to reproduce:
- Create a transaction for 500 dollars
- Create a manual counterpart line for the bank statement line with
  label "test123" and validate
- Create another transaction of -1000 dollars and label "test123"

Issue: The manual counterpart line matched before is being suggested
against the new transaction. The perfect match reconciliation model will
reconcile the manual counterpart line with the new bank statement line.

Analysis:
During the retrieval of possible aml to match we only look at the aml
reconciliation state. Manual counterpart lines created during the
validation of a previous statement line are still selectable candidates,
causing false positive matches in automated reconciliation models.
Test in Enterprise: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/pull/115847

opw-6045050

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#262295

Backport of 7c68c3dbb29eaad4e09d59ef7c86bd525969caec Including its fix: e490c0c66561715853a3f80658f47c940bc453dc

### Issues:

Cancelling the move dest of a manufacturing order does not cancel the MO nor log's an activity warning for the responsible to update the manufacturing demand manually.

Additionally, when selling MTO manufactured products, cancelling the delivery and then changing the sol's demand will update the MO for an incorrect amount.

### Steps to reproduce:

- In the settings: Enable Multi-Steps Routes
- Inventory > Configuration > Warehouse Management > Routes
- Unarchive the MTO route
- Create an MTO, amnufactured product with BOM
- Create and confirm an SO for 3 units of that product
- Cancel the delivery of 3 units
#### > There is no notification on the unrelevant MO linked to the SO
- Adapt the quantity of the SOL from 3 to 0
#### > The delivery is cancelled but no activity is logged what's so ever

### Expected behavior:

Both of these operations should log an activity as the demand of the MO is not updated on quantity decrease.

opw-6010109
opw-6105366
opw-6100043
opw-6087909

X-original-commit: 796316c341c4346152ad9610c30679f47aaa2ff8

---
I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr