**Steps to reproduce in runbot:**
1. Install hr_holidays_attendance.
2. Create an employee with a contract start date (e.g., April 1st).
3. Set the timezone(for both user and emp working schedule) to Europe/Brussels.
4. Create an attendance record (e.g., April 15th).
5. Go to Reporting > Time Off Ledger and remove all filters.
 -> Attendance is correctly shown for all dates from April 1st
6. Create a public holiday on April 16th starting at 00:00.
7. Check the Time Off Ledger again.

**Issue:**
The attendance entry for April 15th disappears after adding the public holiday.

**Cause:**
Calendar leave datetime fields (date_from/date_to) are stored in UTC but compared against attendance dates without converting to the employee's resource calendar timezone, causing date boundaries to shift and records to be incorrectly excluded.
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/b293ce50e0fc9355ffd233557f079916b514eac7/addons/hr_holidays_attendance/report/hr_leave_attendance_report.py#L133-L144

**Solution:**
Convert calendar leave datetimes to the employee timezone before casting to date, ensuring comparisons reflect the correct local boundaries.

**NOTE:**
This issue is mainly reproducible on runbot since its server timezone is
GMT. On local machines configured with UTC, the stored datetime values
already align with the expected conversions, so the date shift does not occur.


opw-6118043




---
I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#265129
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#262179

Currently, an error occurs when a user tries to create a helpdesk team record.

**Steps to Reproduce:**

 - Install the `helpdesk` module without demo data.
 - Go to `Settings` > `Technical` > `Email` > `Email Templates` and delete the 
   `Helpdesk: Ticket Received` template record.
 - Go to `Helpdesk` > `Configuration` > `Stages` and remove all records.
 - Go to `Helpdesk` > `Configuration` > `Helpdesk Teams` and click `New` to create a record.

`AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'id'`

When the user deletes all stages, the system attempts to create a new stage and assign the 
"Helpdesk: Ticket Received" mail template to it [1]. However, if this template record does not 
exist, accessing its id raises the error.

This commit ensures that the template record exists before accessing its id, otherwise, None is 
passed as the default value.

[1]: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/32187f79fb0a595497a5e77db4b22b417b03b8dd/helpdesk/models/helpdesk_team.py#L34

sentry-7482994877

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#117446

Issue:
------
`l10n_br.address_form_fields` inherits from `portal.address_form_fields` but targets a `<select>` element that was moved to `portal_address_extended.address_extended_form_fields` in [saas~19.2].

Traceback:
----------
```py
Error while parsing or validating view:

Element '<xpath expr="//select[@name=&#39;city_id&#39;]/option[not(@value=&#39;&#39;)]">' cannot be located in parent view
```

Steps to reproduce:
-------------------
1. Install `l10n_br` in v19
2. Upgrade to v19.2
3. Upgrade the `l10n_br` module →  Traceback

Root cause:
-----------
The view is adapting an element owned by a sibling view, making the inheritance hierarchy conceptually wrong and fragile.

Solution:
---------
Update the `inherit_id` of `l10n_br.address_form_fields` to `portal_address_extended.address_extended_form_fields` so it correctly inherits from the view that owns the targeted element.

opw: [6125901]

[saas~19.2]: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/026c6f9f2a388ee509a135c53e38f5bb3d08ff73
[6125901]: https://www.odoo.com/odoo/70/tasks/6125901?debug=1

Description of the issue/feature this PR addresses:

Current behavior before PR:

Desired behavior after PR is merged:




---
I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#264045

Overview
------

When searching based on the `Link (short_url)` field in the search bar, in the `link.tracker.click` list view, an error fires up.

How to Reproduce
------

1. Open the Email Marketing app
2. Create a new mailing (or you can use an existing one that has some clicks) and send it
3. Make a click in the email from the recipient's side
4. Open the link tracker `click` related to that mailing (select the mailing → `Link Trackers` stat button → click on a link → `Clicks` stat button)
5. Make a search based on the Link (short_url) field

Expected Behavior
------

Return the list of links that matches the entered search query.

Current Behavior
------

Odoo Server Error.

Cause & Solution
------

The cause of this error is that the `shor_url` field is a computed, non-stored, field, and hence, we cannot directly make a search on it. So, either we make the `short_url` a stored field, which is not so efficient, or we create our own custom `_search_..` method.

Task-6131693

---
I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#265293
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#260146

### Issue before this commit:
In the previous implementation, several Italian taxes, specifically the 4% INPS and the 4% Pension Fund (F.Pens), were not correctly initialized. Although the relevant EDI data was present in the source CSV templates, it was missing from the actual tax records in the database.

### Steps to reproduce the issue:
1. Download Accounting and l10n_it_edi
2. Go to Accounting -> Taxes
3. Open 4% INPS tax and 4% F.Pens and go to Advanced Options tab and see that no Pension Fund Type is associated by default

### Cause of the issue:
While moving the witholding data from l10n_it_edi to l10n_it in this commit https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/40e09ca01242 the templates were not correcly rendered and set up.

### Reason to introduce the fix:
For a tax to be correctly recognized from the XML, it is essential that we have the corresponding tax already configured in Odoo, including the specific type. We should have at least these two taxes fully configured so the system can elaborate them correctly when imported from vendor bills.

opw-6093221

---
I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#258947

`_generate_and_send_invoices` raises `KeyError: 'proforma_pdf_attachment'` when `_get_invoice_extra_attachments` returns an empty recordset for a move in the `success` dict.

The `proforma_pdf_attachment` key is only populated in `_generate_invoice_fallback_documents`, which is called exclusively when `allow_fallback_pdf=True`. However, the code at the return step also triggers when `allow_fallback_pdf=False` (normal wizard path), where the key is never set.

Replace the bare dict access `move_data['proforma_pdf_attachment']` with `move_data.get('proforma_pdf_attachment', self.env['ir.attachment'])` so the flow returns an empty attachment recordset instead of raising a `KeyError` when no fallback proforma PDF was generated.

Fixes: KeyError: 'proforma_pdf_attachment' in account.move.send.wizard Steps to reproduce:
  1. Use the Send & Print wizard on a posted invoice
  2. Trigger a condition where _get_invoice_extra_attachments returns an empty recordset (e.g. via l10n_vn_edi_viettel with sinvoice files not yet fetched) despite no error being raised

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#264564

When updating a mo, if the new component has a multilvl bom, it will only create a mo for the direct child and not the next

Steps to reproduce:
-------------------
* Create a products "Main", "Final", "Semi", "Raw"
* Create a Bom for "Final" with "Semi" as component
* Create a Bom for "Semi" with "Raw as component
* Add MTO on Final and Semi
* Create a MO for Main with no components and confirm it
* Add "Final" to the mo as component as save. -> The MO for "Final" is correctly created with "Semi" as component but there is no MO for "Semi" with "Raw" as component.

Observation:
-------------

When updating de MO, it will write the new SM (Final) to the production, and we will call ```_autoconfirm_production``` with ```no_procurement```: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/6fb69b5640743d3bc7bb52c73cb27da428f2451c/addons/mrp/models/mrp_production.py#L1051 Where we will directly confirm the sm (```_action_confirm```).

From the SM ```_action_confirm``` we will create and run a procurement (manufacture in our case).
From the manufacture we will create the new move line for Semi and go through ```action_confirm``` on the manufacturing order:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/9ef76a4d6010191ab7ab1a0d1085972901280dda/addons/mrp/models/stock_rule.py#L116-L118
In the MO ```action_confirm```, we will confirm the move and should create new procurement for the moves that need them, but, since in our case we have ```no_procurement``` in the context, we will set ```create_proc``` to false:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/9ef76a4d6010191ab7ab1a0d1085972901280dda/addons/mrp/models/mrp_production.py#L1635
Since ```create_proc``` is false we will not create a procurement for those move lines:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/6fb69b5640743d3bc7bb52c73cb27da428f2451c/addons/stock/models/stock_move.py#L1557-L1558
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/6fb69b5640743d3bc7bb52c73cb27da428f2451c/addons/stock/models/stock_move.py#L1571-L1580

opw-6005675

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#258153

Issue
-----
`REF` field of Fedex labels is missing.

Steps to reproduce
-----
- Setup Fedex
- Create a product (set weight)
- Create a delivery for the product
	- Set carrier as Fedex
- Validate delivery
- Opend the label

> REF field is empty

Cause
-----
When filling the `CustomerReferences`, we only specify the SO

https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/aae680f5b86fa87193ba6616e8431eed985b2ee7/delivery_fedex_rest/models/fedex_request.py#L309-L313

The `REF` field is populated using `CUSTOMER_REFERENCE` references, which is not present in this case.

Excerpt of the API DOC
-----
```
"CustomerReference": {
	"type": "object",
	"properties": {
		"customerReferenceType": {
			"type": "string",
			"description": [...],
			"example": "DEPARTMENT_NUMBER",
			"enum": [
				"CUSTOMER_REFERENCE",
				"DEPARTMENT_NUMBER",
				"INVOICE_NUMBER",
				"P_O_NUMBER",
				"INTRACOUNTRY_REGULATORY_REFERENCE",
				"RMA_ASSOCIATION"
			]
		},
		"value": {
			"type": "string",
			"description": [...],
			"example": "3686"
		}
	}
},
```

[...] replaces long description strings, refer to API for full documentation.

Result after fix
-----
<img width="477" height="738" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/0d3a0786-5b7d-41cc-8548-2dc7b0f379ab" />

-----
Ticket:
opw-6101620

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#116870

Before this commit, finding a bom for a recordset of `products` involved looping over all the boms and it will loop over all the `product_variant_ids` of `bom.product_tmpl_id` if the bom's `product_id` is NULL. This approach might loop over variants which we are not trying to find a bom for. In additon to that, due to the fact that multiple boms might have the same `product_tmpl_id`, this approach might consider the same variants in the inner loop redundantly even though we matched the variant with a bom in a previous itration.

Worst case, this might result in a time complexity of $O(N * M)$ where N is the number of boms and M is the number of variants.

To improve the performance, I only considered the variants given in the paramater `products` and in addition to that, I created a new dictionary mapping a `product_tmpl_id` to its bom if the bom doesn't have a variant set. By doing this, I can loop over the `products` given and if it doesn't have a bom set then it will be set to the one its template had taken from the previos loop.

In a method call with the following constraints
    - **2** products the method was finding a bom for
    - The 2 products had the same template and the template contained **550** active variants
    - The boms were only related to the template rather than the variants themselves.

| Input Size | Before | After |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| 100 | 0.78s | 0.03s |
| 1000 | 8.53s | 0.11s |
| 10000 | 80.99s | 0.73s |

---
I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#247465

Currently, an error occurs when a user tries to create a helpdesk team record.

**Steps to Reproduce:**

 - Install the `helpdesk` module without demo data.
 - Go to `Settings` > `Technical` > `Email` > `Email Templates` and delete the 
   `Helpdesk: Ticket Received` template record.
 - Go to `Helpdesk` > `Configuration` > `Stages` and remove all records.
 - Go to `Helpdesk` > `Configuration` > `Helpdesk Teams` and click `New` to create a record.

`AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'id'`

When the user deletes all stages, the system attempts to create a new stage and assign the 
"Helpdesk: Ticket Received" mail template to it [1]. However, if this template record does not 
exist, accessing its id raises the error.

This commit ensures that the template record exists before accessing its id, otherwise, None is 
passed as the default value.

[1]: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/32187f79fb0a595497a5e77db4b22b417b03b8dd/helpdesk/models/helpdesk_team.py#L34

sentry-7482994877

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#117446

Currently, an error occurs when a user tries to create a helpdesk team record.

**Steps to Reproduce:**

 - Install the `helpdesk` module without demo data.
 - Go to `Settings` > `Technical` > `Email` > `Email Templates` and delete the 
   `Helpdesk: Ticket Received` template record.
 - Go to `Helpdesk` > `Configuration` > `Stages` and remove all records.
 - Go to `Helpdesk` > `Configuration` > `Helpdesk Teams` and click `New` to create a record.

`AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'id'`

When the user deletes all stages, the system attempts to create a new stage and assign the 
"Helpdesk: Ticket Received" mail template to it [1]. However, if this template record does not 
exist, accessing its id raises the error.

This commit ensures that the template record exists before accessing its id, otherwise, None is 
passed as the default value.

[1]: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/32187f79fb0a595497a5e77db4b22b417b03b8dd/helpdesk/models/helpdesk_team.py#L34

sentry-7482994877

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#117446

**Problem:**
change of standard price on a product valued by lot 
and with standard price category does not work

**Steps to reproduce:**
- create a storable product tracked and valued by lot
- set category as standard price
- set a cost of 10 and save
- click on the quantity smart button and then "update quantity"
- add a quantity of 1 in a new lot
- on the product form, change the cost to 12 and save
- reload the page

**Current behavior:**
the cost is back to 10

**Expected behavior:**
it should stay 12

**Cause of the issue:**
when we change the standard_price of the product, 
_change_standard_price() is called from the write method
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/eaa6c4352aec2be8519360c282f3f6504a2f263c/addons/stock_account/models/product.py#L293

Inside _change_standard_price(): 
step 1: a new product.value is created
step 2 : we set the standard_price of the lots to be the same 
as the one of the product
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/eaa6c4352aec2be8519360c282f3f6504a2f263c/addons/stock_account/models/product.py#L319-L323

In the create method for product.value (step 1), we call _set_value() 
on the moves with a remaining quantity
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/eaa6c4352aec2be8519360c282f3f6504a2f263c/addons/stock_account/models/product_value.py#L95
At the end of set_value we call _update_standard_price() on 
our product
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/eaa6c4352aec2be8519360c282f3f6504a2f263c/addons/stock_account/models/stock_move.py#L337

Because the product is lot_valuated we update the standard_price 
based on the avg_cost of the product (this is needed because 
for instance if the prod is avco we can not simply use 
_run_average_batch as it is the case for non lot valuated avco 
product, because then the result won't be a weighted average of 
each lot, whereas avg_cost does take this into account) 
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/eaa6c4352aec2be8519360c282f3f6504a2f263c/addons/stock_account/models/product.py#L633-L634

To compute the avg_cost, inside _compute_value(), we use 
the total value of each lot
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/eaa6c4352aec2be8519360c282f3f6504a2f263c/addons/stock_account/models/product.py#L226

The lots total value is computed inside the _compute_value() 
method of stock.lot. 
In this method, because the product is valued by standard_price
we use the standard price of the lot
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/eaa6c4352aec2be8519360c282f3f6504a2f263c/addons/stock_account/models/stock_lot.py#L40
But this value hasn't been updated yet (it will be at the time 
of step 2) so it's still the old value (10 in our case). 

So the avg_cost of the product will also be the old value and 
the standard price will be udpated back the old value

Then, at the end of _change_standard_price() (at the time of step 2)
the standard price of the lots are set based on the standard price 
of the product (so it stays the old value)

**fix:**
Inside _update_standard_price(), if the product is valued by standard 
price we do nothing 
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/eaa6c4352aec2be8519360c282f3f6504a2f263c/addons/stock_account/models/product.py#L639-L640
We apply the same logic for the lot_valued product, if it's standard_price
there is nothing to update

opw-5949146

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#264991

### Issue before this commit:
In the previous implementation, several Italian taxes, specifically the 4% INPS and the 4% Pension Fund (F.Pens), were not correctly initialized. Although the relevant EDI data was present in the source CSV templates, it was missing from the actual tax records in the database.

### Steps to reproduce the issue:
1. Download Accounting and l10n_it_edi
2. Go to Accounting -> Taxes
3. Open 4% INPS tax and 4% F.Pens and go to Advanced Options tab and see that no Pension Fund Type is associated by default

### Cause of the issue:
While moving the witholding data from l10n_it_edi to l10n_it in this commit https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/40e09ca01242 the templates were not correcly rendered and set up.

### Reason to introduce the fix:
For a tax to be correctly recognized from the XML, it is essential that we have the corresponding tax already configured in Odoo, including the specific type. We should have at least these two taxes fully configured so the system can elaborate them correctly when imported from vendor bills.

opw-6093221

---
I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#258947

`_generate_and_send_invoices` raises `KeyError: 'proforma_pdf_attachment'` when `_get_invoice_extra_attachments` returns an empty recordset for a move in the `success` dict.

The `proforma_pdf_attachment` key is only populated in `_generate_invoice_fallback_documents`, which is called exclusively when `allow_fallback_pdf=True`. However, the code at the return step also triggers when `allow_fallback_pdf=False` (normal wizard path), where the key is never set.

Replace the bare dict access `move_data['proforma_pdf_attachment']` with `move_data.get('proforma_pdf_attachment', self.env['ir.attachment'])` so the flow returns an empty attachment recordset instead of raising a `KeyError` when no fallback proforma PDF was generated.

Fixes: KeyError: 'proforma_pdf_attachment' in account.move.send.wizard Steps to reproduce:
  1. Use the Send & Print wizard on a posted invoice
  2. Trigger a condition where _get_invoice_extra_attachments returns an empty recordset (e.g. via l10n_vn_edi_viettel with sinvoice files not yet fetched) despite no error being raised

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#264564

When updating a mo, if the new component has a multilvl bom, it will only create a mo for the direct child and not the next

Steps to reproduce:
-------------------
* Create a products "Main", "Final", "Semi", "Raw"
* Create a Bom for "Final" with "Semi" as component
* Create a Bom for "Semi" with "Raw as component
* Add MTO on Final and Semi
* Create a MO for Main with no components and confirm it
* Add "Final" to the mo as component as save. -> The MO for "Final" is correctly created with "Semi" as component but there is no MO for "Semi" with "Raw" as component.

Observation:
-------------

When updating de MO, it will write the new SM (Final) to the production, and we will call ```_autoconfirm_production``` with ```no_procurement```: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/6fb69b5640743d3bc7bb52c73cb27da428f2451c/addons/mrp/models/mrp_production.py#L1051 Where we will directly confirm the sm (```_action_confirm```).

From the SM ```_action_confirm``` we will create and run a procurement (manufacture in our case).
From the manufacture we will create the new move line for Semi and go through ```action_confirm``` on the manufacturing order:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/9ef76a4d6010191ab7ab1a0d1085972901280dda/addons/mrp/models/stock_rule.py#L116-L118
In the MO ```action_confirm```, we will confirm the move and should create new procurement for the moves that need them, but, since in our case we have ```no_procurement``` in the context, we will set ```create_proc``` to false:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/9ef76a4d6010191ab7ab1a0d1085972901280dda/addons/mrp/models/mrp_production.py#L1635
Since ```create_proc``` is false we will not create a procurement for those move lines:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/6fb69b5640743d3bc7bb52c73cb27da428f2451c/addons/stock/models/stock_move.py#L1557-L1558
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/6fb69b5640743d3bc7bb52c73cb27da428f2451c/addons/stock/models/stock_move.py#L1571-L1580

opw-6005675

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#258153

Issue
-----
`REF` field of Fedex labels is missing.

Steps to reproduce
-----
- Setup Fedex
- Create a product (set weight)
- Create a delivery for the product
	- Set carrier as Fedex
- Validate delivery
- Opend the label

> REF field is empty

Cause
-----
When filling the `CustomerReferences`, we only specify the SO

https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/aae680f5b86fa87193ba6616e8431eed985b2ee7/delivery_fedex_rest/models/fedex_request.py#L309-L313

The `REF` field is populated using `CUSTOMER_REFERENCE` references, which is not present in this case.

Excerpt of the API DOC
-----
```
"CustomerReference": {
	"type": "object",
	"properties": {
		"customerReferenceType": {
			"type": "string",
			"description": [...],
			"example": "DEPARTMENT_NUMBER",
			"enum": [
				"CUSTOMER_REFERENCE",
				"DEPARTMENT_NUMBER",
				"INVOICE_NUMBER",
				"P_O_NUMBER",
				"INTRACOUNTRY_REGULATORY_REFERENCE",
				"RMA_ASSOCIATION"
			]
		},
		"value": {
			"type": "string",
			"description": [...],
			"example": "3686"
		}
	}
},
```

[...] replaces long description strings, refer to API for full documentation.

Result after fix
-----
<img width="477" height="738" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/0d3a0786-5b7d-41cc-8548-2dc7b0f379ab" />

-----
Ticket:
opw-6101620

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#116870

Currently, an error occurs when a user tries to create a helpdesk team record.

**Steps to Reproduce:**

 - Install the `helpdesk` module without demo data.
 - Go to `Settings` > `Technical` > `Email` > `Email Templates` and delete the 
   `Helpdesk: Ticket Received` template record.
 - Go to `Helpdesk` > `Configuration` > `Stages` and remove all records.
 - Go to `Helpdesk` > `Configuration` > `Helpdesk Teams` and click `New` to create a record.

`AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'id'`

When the user deletes all stages, the system attempts to create a new stage and assign the 
"Helpdesk: Ticket Received" mail template to it [1]. However, if this template record does not 
exist, accessing its id raises the error.

This commit ensures that the template record exists before accessing its id, otherwise, None is 
passed as the default value.

[1]: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/32187f79fb0a595497a5e77db4b22b417b03b8dd/helpdesk/models/helpdesk_team.py#L34

sentry-7482994877

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#117446

### Issue:

The `Print Label`, `Register Production`, `Register By-products`and `Register Consumed Materials` are all available in the test types at control point creation.

### Expected behavior:

These test types are only meant for manufacturing operations and are supposed to be hidden by the field domain:
https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/f56aa85b4ad32c5d9ad5593df1366d72e88da0e4/mrp_workorder/models/quality.py#L102-L104 https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/00d6cccd75c402378698a6fd11ee2692f2361c7f/mrp_workorder/models/quality.py#L20-L24

### Cause of the issue:

Since saas-18.1: 5ef007a2116e528b796ebe80fb291ba5f1a94c8f domains are optimised into equivalents SQL clause with better sql performances. This optimization results in the following match for boolean fields: 
`('field', '=', True)` -> `('field', 'in', OrderedSet([True]))` 
`('field', '=', False)` -> `('field', ' not in', OrderedSet([True]))`
Because of these:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/82b16e8feb3d60a9a3855e3adb3164ae5a6c041d/odoo/orm/domains.py#L1058-L1079 https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/82b16e8feb3d60a9a3855e3adb3164ae5a6c041d/odoo/orm/domains.py#L1215-L1236
Now the issue is that the specific `search_method` of the `allow_registration` field is then called with this optimized domain: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/82b16e8feb3d60a9a3855e3adb3164ae5a6c041d/odoo/orm/domains.py#L860-L866 https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/00d6cccd75c402378698a6fd11ee2692f2361c7f/mrp_workorder/models/quality.py#L20-L24
And since `value` is defined as a non empty ordered set in both cases it the search method returns a True leaf as search domain.

opw-5915197

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#117068

Currently, an error occurs when a user tries to create a helpdesk team record.

**Steps to Reproduce:**

 - Install the `helpdesk` module without demo data.
 - Go to `Settings` > `Technical` > `Email` > `Email Templates` and delete the 
   `Helpdesk: Ticket Received` template record.
 - Go to `Helpdesk` > `Configuration` > `Stages` and remove all records.
 - Go to `Helpdesk` > `Configuration` > `Helpdesk Teams` and click `New` to create a record.

`AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'id'`

When the user deletes all stages, the system attempts to create a new stage and assign the 
"Helpdesk: Ticket Received" mail template to it [1]. However, if this template record does not 
exist, accessing its id raises the error.

This commit ensures that the template record exists before accessing its id, otherwise, None is 
passed as the default value.

[1]: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/32187f79fb0a595497a5e77db4b22b417b03b8dd/helpdesk/models/helpdesk_team.py#L34

sentry-7482994877

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#117446

Currently, an error occurs when a user selects a shift template on a planning slot.

**Steps to Reproduce:**

 - Install the `Planning` module with demo data.
 - Create a `Resource Time Off` record with `start` and `end date` separated by more than 
  `1400 days (around 3.9 years)`, and Set the Working Hours field to Standard 40 hours/week.
 - Go to `Planning` > `Configuration` > `Shift Templates`, open an `existing record` or create 
   a `new one`, and set the `Working Days` to more than 1 day.
 - Create a new `planning slot`, Assign the resource `Abigail Peterson`, and select the above 
   `shift template`.

`AttributeError: 'bool' object has no attribute 'replace'`

This error occurs because when the user sets the shift template, the compute method runs to 
calculate the start and end datetimes [1]. It computes the end datetime by adding the template 
duration in working days from the given start datetime using the resource working calendar within 
a searchable range of around 1400 days [2]. During this computation, leaves and non-working days 
are skipped [3]. If no valid working interval is found within the searchable range, then it returns 
False [4], which raises the error [5].

This commit ensures that if plan_days returns False, the computation falls back to the previously 
calculated end date.

[1]: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/6ae5d3df6e9305416e4d6f74259cd01753025f42/planning/models/planning.py#L662-L671

[2]: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/a439bd305112f6efc752ce900f7782e7faaf7312/addons/resource/models/resource_calendar.py#L826-L835

[3]: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/a439bd305112f6efc752ce900f7782e7faaf7312/addons/resource/models/resource_calendar.py#L533-L537

[4]: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/a439bd305112f6efc752ce900f7782e7faaf7312/addons/resource/models/resource_calendar.py#L835

[5]- https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/6ae5d3df6e9305416e4d6f74259cd01753025f42/planning/models/planning.py#L653-L654

sentry-7472958590

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#117073

Currently, an error occurs when a user tries to create a helpdesk team record.

**Steps to Reproduce:**

 - Install the `helpdesk` module without demo data.
 - Go to `Settings` > `Technical` > `Email` > `Email Templates` and delete the 
   `Helpdesk: Ticket Received` template record.
 - Go to `Helpdesk` > `Configuration` > `Stages` and remove all records.
 - Go to `Helpdesk` > `Configuration` > `Helpdesk Teams` and click `New` to create a record.

`AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'id'`

When the user deletes all stages, the system attempts to create a new stage and assign the 
"Helpdesk: Ticket Received" mail template to it [1]. However, if this template record does not 
exist, accessing its id raises the error.

This commit ensures that the template record exists before accessing its id, otherwise, None is 
passed as the default value.

[1]: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/32187f79fb0a595497a5e77db4b22b417b03b8dd/helpdesk/models/helpdesk_team.py#L34

sentry-7482994877

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#117446

**Problem:**
When a project analytic budget is revised, the project update description shows an inflated total budget — the sum of both the original and the revised amounts — instead of reflecting only the active (confirmed) revision.

**Steps to reproduce:**
1. Create a project with an analytic account
2. Create an analytic budget of $10,000 and confirm it
3. Create a revision of that budget for $15,000 and confirm it
4. Create a new project update
5. The update shows "$25,000" as the total budget instead of "$15,000"

**Current behavior:**
The project update displays the sum of all budget revisions ($25,000), regardless of their state.

**Expected behavior:**
Only the active confirmed budget ($15,000) should be used.

**Cause of the issue:**
`_compute_budget` queries all `budget.line` records matching the project's analytic account without filtering by the parent `budget.analytic` state. When a budget is revised, the original transitions to state `revised` while the new one becomes `confirmed`. Because `_compute_budget` has no state filter, it sums both, producing an inflated `total_budget_amount`. This field is then used in the project update template to compute the displayed budget total and percentage. By contrast, `_get_budget_items` — used for the detail rows — already applies `state in ['confirmed', 'done']`, so the two methods were inconsistent.

**Fix:**
Applying the same state filter to `_compute_budget` as already present in `_get_budget_items` ensures both methods draw from the same set of active budgets, keeping the project update totals consistent with the budget detail rows.

opw-6128855

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#117490
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#115285

Steps to reproduce:
-------------------
1. Go to Accounting > Reporting > Profit and Loss.
2. Resize the window so the report doesn't fit vertically.
3. Scroll to the bottom

Observation: the last rows are not reachable!!

Why this happens:
-----------------
The report content is inside a wrapper that has `height: 100%`, so the wrapper takes the full height of its parent. But the wrapper is placed below the action bar, so we end up with a wrapper taller than the space it actually has.

Example: the parent is 700px and the action bar is 100px. The wrapper still get 700px which is the parent height, but it starts below the action bar, so its bottom 100px is below the visible area. The rows in this 100px are not reachable.

The fix:
--------
Set `min-height: 0` on the wrapper. This way it can shrink and take only the available space, not the full parent height (In our example, the wrapper height will now be 600px, so with the action bar, it adds up to 700px, the height of the parent).

Before (at full scroll): "Net Income" clipped
<img width="1309" height="990" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/e1b6bfd6-a6dd-4b73-8a27-a49c8dca03de" />

After (at full scroll):
<img width="1310" height="991" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/e17fc283-e3c8-455d-85cd-dacdd1fc9537" />



opw-6173522

Currently, an error occurs when a user tries to create a helpdesk team record.

**Steps to Reproduce:**

 - Install the `helpdesk` module without demo data.
 - Go to `Settings` > `Technical` > `Email` > `Email Templates` and delete the 
   `Helpdesk: Ticket Received` template record.
 - Go to `Helpdesk` > `Configuration` > `Stages` and remove all records.
 - Go to `Helpdesk` > `Configuration` > `Helpdesk Teams` and click `New` to create a record.

`AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'id'`

When the user deletes all stages, the system attempts to create a new stage and assign the 
"Helpdesk: Ticket Received" mail template to it [1]. However, if this template record does not 
exist, accessing its id raises the error.

This commit ensures that the template record exists before accessing its id, otherwise, None is 
passed as the default value.

[1]: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/32187f79fb0a595497a5e77db4b22b417b03b8dd/helpdesk/models/helpdesk_team.py#L34

sentry-7482994877

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#117446

### Issue:

The `Print Label`, `Register Production`, `Register By-products`and `Register Consumed Materials` are all available in the test types at control point creation.

### Expected behavior:

These test types are only meant for manufacturing operations and are supposed to be hidden by the field domain:
https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/f56aa85b4ad32c5d9ad5593df1366d72e88da0e4/mrp_workorder/models/quality.py#L102-L104 https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/00d6cccd75c402378698a6fd11ee2692f2361c7f/mrp_workorder/models/quality.py#L20-L24

### Cause of the issue:

Since saas-18.1: 5ef007a2116e528b796ebe80fb291ba5f1a94c8f domains are optimised into equivalents SQL clause with better sql performances. This optimization results in the following match for boolean fields: 
`('field', '=', True)` -> `('field', 'in', OrderedSet([True]))` 
`('field', '=', False)` -> `('field', ' not in', OrderedSet([True]))`
Because of these:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/82b16e8feb3d60a9a3855e3adb3164ae5a6c041d/odoo/orm/domains.py#L1058-L1079 https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/82b16e8feb3d60a9a3855e3adb3164ae5a6c041d/odoo/orm/domains.py#L1215-L1236
Now the issue is that the specific `search_method` of the `allow_registration` field is then called with this optimized domain: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/82b16e8feb3d60a9a3855e3adb3164ae5a6c041d/odoo/orm/domains.py#L860-L866 https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/00d6cccd75c402378698a6fd11ee2692f2361c7f/mrp_workorder/models/quality.py#L20-L24
And since `value` is defined as a non empty ordered set in both cases it the search method returns a True leaf as search domain.

opw-5915197

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#117068

Issue:
-----------------------------------
At certain times of the day (e.g., around midnight UTC), the test would fail deterministically
```
test_allocation_stats_with_duplicate_leave_type_names
    self.assertEqual(leave_type_no_comp.with_context(employee_id=employee_id).max_leaves, 10)
AssertionError: 0.0 != 10
```

Cause:
-----------------------------------
This occurred due to a timezone mismatch during the test execution. When creating the `hr.leave.allocation`, `date_from` implicitly defaults to `fields.Date.context_today(self)` (which evaluates the date based on the test user's timezone, e.g., Europe/Brussels). However, the `max_leaves` computation in `hr.leave.type` evaluates valid allocations using `fields.Date.today()` as the target date (which strictly evaluates to the UTC date)

At certain times of day, this caused the allocation's `date_from` to evaluate to 'tomorrow' relative to the UTC `target_date`. Because the allocation was technically in the future relative to UTC, it was skipped during the computation causing `max_leaves` to return 0.0 instead of 10.

Solution:
-----------------------------------
Explicitly define `'date_from': date.today()` when creating the allocation in the test case. This perfectly aligns the allocation's starting date with the strict UTC evaluation used by the `max_leaves` computation under the hood.

Runbot Error: [937759](https://runbot.odoo.com/odoo/runbot.build.error/937759)
Related PR: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/261680

Steps to reproduce:
----------------------------------------
- Install the l10N_ch localization.
- Create an 8.1% purchase tax (tax included).
- Add the tax created in step 2 to the credit account in wage type 1910.
- Create an employee in the Swiss company and create a certificate type in the wage statement tabulation of the employee record.
- Create a contract for the employee created in step 4.
- Ensure that wage type 1910 is present in the contract created in step 5 and set the contract's status to 'Running'.
- Generate a new payslip for the employee created in step 4.
- Compute the sheet and create the draft entry.
- The tax amount is not calculated correctly.

Cause:
----------------------------------------
In Swiss payslips taxes are always computed as excluded because of [`_prepare_product_base_line_for_taxes_computation()`](https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/30b525062fee48a453162e4f8087000b3c7dcd24/addons/account/models/account_move.py#L1510).

Solution:
----------------------------------------
Override `_prepare_product_base_line_for_taxes_computation` and remove the special mode.

opw-4997536

Steps to reproduce:
===================
1. Create 2 pricelists, pricelist 1 is backend-only (no website_id, not selectable), pricelists 2 have website_id set
2. Create a website form creating a customer with a pricelist field
3. Submit the form selecting pricelist 2 (first website-available one)

=> Pricelist reverts to pricelist 1 (the global default)

Cause:
======
When creating a partner via a website form with a specific pricelist, the inverse of `property_product_pricelist` calls
`_get_country_pricelist_multi` to determine the "default" pricelist and decide whether to store the value explicitly or store False (meaning "use the default"). With `website_sale` installed, the search domain hook adds website-availability filtering during website requests. This causes the inverse to compute a different "default" pricelist than what the compute uses outside the website context.

The inverse sees pricelist 2 as the "website default" (first by sequence matching the website domain) and stores False. The compute later runs without website context, finds pricelist 1 as the global default, and returns the wrong value.

Solution:
=========
The fix bypasses website filtering in the search domain hook when called from the inverse, ensuring the stored value is based on the context-independent default.

opw-6092161

---
I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr

**problem:**
When taxes are configured as tax-included and a fiscal position remaps them (for example from NL 21% ST to EU intra B2B 0% EX EU G), the computed unit price is stored with excessive decimal digits (e.g 82.644628099...)

**steps to reproduce:**
1. Install `l10n_nl`
2. Switch to the Dutch company/ NL company
3. Ensure fiscal position `EU intra B2B` maps `21% ST` to `0% EX EU G`
4. Set tax `21% ST` as tax included
5. Create a product with sales tax `21% ST`
6. Create a quotation/invoice, apply fiscal position `EU intra B2B`
7. Add the product line (or change fiscal position on an existing line and update taxes)
8. You will see `price_unit` displays too many decimals

**cause:**
In both `sale.order.line._reset_price_unit` and `account.move.line._compute_price_unit` unit prices coming from tax-included remapping are written directly to price_unit. https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/7302b504fc03583944f4dff947cf9725fec9a75b/addons/sale/models/sale_order_line.py#L598-L602 https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/7302b504fc03583944f4dff947cf9725fec9a75b/addons/account/models/account_move_line.py#L871-L878

The tax remapping path uses tax detail computations with 'global' rounding to preserve fiscal accuracy during conversion, but the resulting `price_unit` was written back without currency rounding. https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/7302b504fc03583944f4dff947cf9725fec9a75b/addons/account/models/account_tax.py#L1303-L1310

**fix:**
- Round computed `price_unit` with document currency precision before storing in both sale_order_line, account_move_line.
- In `account.move.action_update_fpos_values`, recompute from untaxed base when tax include mode changes, then round with currency precision. (We do this change to ensure behavior is consistent, when changing fiscal position and clicking "update taxes" on already existent quotations/invoices"

opw-6081856

---
I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr