# How to reproduce
- Install the Events, Porject & CRM apps
- Create two event A & B with tickets that can be purchased
- Go to Events > Configuration > Lead Generation
- Create a Lead Generation Rule with :
	- Create : Per Order
	- When : Attendees are created
	- Event : None
- Create a new quotation with two lines :
	- Product : Even Registration for event A 1st, then B
- Confirm the SO

# The problem
A traceback will appear

# Cause of the issue
When confirming the SO, we create `event.registrations`s that will check for
lead generation rules and create or update `crm.lead`s accordingly :
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/3bf89b4f467390807c20f7b007a875a77542e76f/addons/event_crm/models/event_registration.py#L35

We will then group the registrations by leads & grouping model :
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/3bf89b4f467390807c20f7b007a875a77542e76f/addons/event_crm/models/event_lead_rule.py#L166

For all groups, if the lead does not exist, we create one :
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/3bf89b4f467390807c20f7b007a875a77542e76f/addons/event_crm/models/event_lead_rule.py#L184-L187

`_get_lead_values()` works fine with multiple `event.registrations`s, but crashes
when those registrations does not have all the same event, which is our case :
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/3bf89b4f467390807c20f7b007a875a77542e76f/addons/event_crm/models/event_registration.py#L170

# Proposed solution
Since we have multiple events and leads are associated to a single event :
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/3bf89b4f467390807c20f7b007a875a77542e76f/addons/event_crm/models/crm_lead.py#L11

We group the registrations by event and create multiple leads accordingly

opw-6167518

---
I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#265017

**PROBLEM**
In some case, because of rounding issues, the withholding base amount can be bigger than the total amount of the invoice, which should not be the case.

**STEP TO REPRODUCE**

1. Install l10n_pe_edi
2. Create an invoice with those 2 lines: qty: 300, unit_price: 0.481936, tax: VAT 18% + 3% IGV Withholding qty: 300, unit_price: 0.747376, tax: VAT 18% + 3% IGV Withholding
3. Confirm the invoice, and send the xml (if this fail, you may have to change the name of the invoice, using odoo inspector or other means).
4. Open the xml, and notice the base amount for the allowance on the document level is 435.18 which is bigger than the invoice payable amount.

**CAUSE**
We exclude the withholding taxes to compute the invoice taxInclusiveAmount. When computing this amount, we round the line base and the tax total of the VAT 18% tax leading to the result of 435.17. When creating the allowance node for the Withholding taxes, the base used for the withholding taxes is the sum of the line base, and the tax total of previous tax NOT rounded. There is no easy way to change the withholding tax computation, so we just limit the base to not be bigger than the invoice total when there is rounding issues.

opw-6010388

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#113689

this pr fixes 3 bug, as all are closely related.

Step to reproduce (hide is_custom attr in kiosk mode):
- have two attributes A and B
- A has only 1 attribute value with is_custom = True
- B can have any two value ( ex. gender: male/female)
- use it on a product  and make it available in POS for kiosk
- start kiosk and open that product

Observation:
- we do not get option to select option from A but the heading is visible
- when we select from B, Add to cart is disabled.

Cause:
- we do not allow attribute values with is_custom = True in kiosk
- but we display the attribute regardless
- the Add to cart btn depends on `selectedValues`, which requires
value from each attribute, in this case, we are not seletion anything from A
- so it is disabled

Fix:
- we introduced  `attributesToDisplay` which will hide heading in case of single
custom value for any attribute
- for Add to cart, wenow do not expect value from `is_custom`  attribute values.

 Allow product with 1 attr which is `is_custom` to be
 configurable in configs other than kiosk) correct fix for commit

 Step to reproduce
- have attributes A
- A has only 1 attribute value with is_custom = True
- use it on a product and make it available in POS
- start pos and open that product

Observation:
- we do not get option to select add text for A

Cause:
- in pos, we consider product to be configurable only it has more than 1
attributes, which misses is_custom attr

Fix:
- we backport commit[1] and also considers its side effect by introducing
`isProductConfigurable` for pos_self_order, which will still avoid
`is_custom` attrs for kiosk

[1] https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/5155c77a03ed2ff6c914eac41cc81ccb34b1f3c7

Empty page is displayed if product has only `is_custom` attribute value
and other attribute with type other then 'no_variant' for combo item

 Step to reproduce
- have attributes A and B
- A has only 1 attribute value with is_custom = True
- B has two values with type "always"
- use it on a product and add that product in combo item and make it available
  in Kisok
- start kiosk and open that combo and select that product

Observation:
- we do not get option to select

Cause:
- `availableAttributeValue` only show `no_variant` and non `is_custom` attribute
   values in attributeSelection component.

Fix:
- before mounting Attributeselection component, we check if product has required
  attribute or not.

opw-6100965

---
I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#266138
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#257880

## Steps to reproduce:

1. Install `l10n_lu_reports`, swap to the LU company
2. Look at the partner Azure Interior.
    1. They have no open balances on `asset_receivable` or `liability_payable` accounts.
    2. Their `supplier_count` is higher than their `customer_count`.
3. Navigate to Accounting > Reporting > General Ledger.
4. Select the 2026 fiscal year.
5. Select gear > FAIA report.
6. Open the downloaded file. Notice:
    1. Azure Interior is listed under /MasterFiles/Customers/Customer.
    2. There are no /MasterFiles/Suppliers.
    3. Azure Interior's ID (14 in this case) is referenced in a /SupplierID section.
7. Take a gander at the official XSD for LU [1]. The SupplierID must match an element in /MasterFiles/Suppliers.

Video: [2]

## Explanation

This is one of several errors found with the FAIA export. See PR #113316 for more.

It's possible to have a /SupplierID listed on a /Transaction/Line element but not have a /Suppliers/Supplier element that it refers to. This is not valid according to the FAIA report's schema [1].

This happens because /Transaction/Line and /MasterFiles use different criteria to determine if a partner is a Customer or a Supplier.

The element /Transaction/Line [3] determines this from the `partner_vals['type']` value [4].  This value is 'customer' or 'supplier' and is determined by comparing the ResPartner fields `customer_rank` and `supplier_rank`. In case of a tie, the partner is assigned as a 'supplier'.

The element /MasterFiles allows a partner to be both a Customer and a Supplier via `partner_vals['types']` [5]. Partners with an open `asset_receivable` balance at the start or end of the reporting period are listed as Customers [6]. Likewise, partners with an open `liability_payable` balance are listed as Suppliers [7]. If there are no open balances, partners are put in the Customer list by default.

The XSD validation error will not show up in a standard Runbot database because the namespace for the XSD is incorrect. If you manually fix the XSD namespace (`xmlns:doc` instead of `xmlns`) and use xmllint to check a generated XML against the XSD, it will raise the following error.

> No match found for key-sequence ['14'] of keyref 'RefGLTransactionLineSupplier'. Downloads/general_ledger (5).xml fails to validate

[1] https://pfi.public.lu/dam-assets/backup/FAIA/FAIA/XSD_Files.zip. I will note that there are three XSDs. Version A has a different namespace and appears to be more restrictive. The "full" XSD document does not raise these errors.
[2] https://drive.google.com/file/d/1xeULpCcGgZk-kYcCjBTKxcfv4ICYRzaB/view?usp=sharing
[3] https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/434d88960abb5e424fdc1106fc93935d328bff78/account_saft/data/saft_report.xml#L244-L248
[4] https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/434d88960abb5e424fdc1106fc93935d328bff78/account_saft/models/account_general_ledger.py#L299
[5] https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/434d88960abb5e424fdc1106fc93935d328bff78/account_saft/models/account_general_ledger.py#L303-L309
[6] https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/434d88960abb5e424fdc1106fc93935d328bff78/account_saft/data/saft_report.xml#L153
[7] https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/434d88960abb5e424fdc1106fc93935d328bff78/account_saft/data/saft_report.xml#L173

opw-6107107

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#117799

opw-6211908 

## Summary

When selecting a vendor price from `product.supplierinfo`, the purchase module converts `purchase.order.date_order` (a `fields.Datetime` stored in UTC) to a `date` using Python's `.date()` method. This extracts the **UTC calendar date** rather than the user's local date.

For users in positive-offset timezones (e.g. `Pacific/Auckland` UTC+12, `Africa/Johannesburg` UTC+2), this produces the wrong day, causing `product.supplierinfo` records with `date_start`/`date_end` to be incorrectly included or excluded during vendor price selection.

### Affected methods

| File | Method |
|------|--------|
| `addons/purchase/models/purchase_order_line.py` | `_compute_selected_seller_id` |
| `addons/purchase/models/purchase_order_line.py` | `_prepare_purchase_order_line` |
| `addons/purchase/models/purchase_order.py` | `_get_product_catalog_lines_data` |

### Fix

Replace `.date()` calls with `fields.Date.context_today(record, timestamp=...)` which correctly converts the UTC datetime to the user's timezone before extracting the date.

Also fixes `fields.Date.today()` → `fields.Date.context_today(self)` in `_prepare_purchase_order_line` for consistency (same issue — `fields.Date.today()` returns UTC date, not the user's local date).

## Steps to reproduce

1. Set user timezone to **Pacific/Auckland** (UTC+12).
2. Create a product with a vendor pricelist (`product.supplierinfo`) entry:
   - **Vendor**: any partner
   - **Price**: 50.00
   - **Start Date**: 2026-05-13
   - **End Date**: 2026-05-31
3. Create a **Purchase Order** for that vendor.
4. Set the **Order Deadline** to **2026-05-13 08:00** NZST (stored as `2026-05-12 20:00 UTC`).
5. Add the product as a line on the PO.

**Expected**: The supplier price of 50.00 is selected — the user's local date (May 13) is within the validity window.

**Actual**: No supplier price is matched. `.date()` on the UTC datetime returns `2026-05-12`, which is before `date_start` of `2026-05-13`, so the supplierinfo record is skipped.

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#266468
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#263992

### Steps to reproduce:

- In the settings enable: Multi-steps routes
- Inventory > Configuration > Warehouse Management > Routes
- Unarchive MTO
- Create a storable product P with a bom using the MTO Route
- In the Miscellaneous tab of the bom tick Batch Size and set it to 2
- Create and confirm a sale order for 6 units of P
#### > Three MO's are created but only the last one will update the quantities of the delivery at validation of the production.

### Cause of the issue:

The `move_dest_ids` of the `move_finished_ids` is only set on the last of the three productions. That is only the last MO is properly chained to the delivery via an MTO chain. This happens because the `move_dest_ids` field of the `mrp.production` model is a `One2Many` field: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/a2f072fe99a03aaf521bba1965e7f29a1c99e325/addons/mrp/models/mrp_production.py#L223-L224 Which implies that each move can be linked to at most one mrp.production via the `created_production_id` field. However, if you have set a batch size on your bom, it is expected for a single move to create multiple mo's. While the `move_dest_ids` of each of these MO is appropriately set in the create vals to be the mto `stock.move` of the delivery, due to the nature of the `created_production_id` field only the *last* mo will created with a set `move_dest_ids` as this is the only record that will be set as `created_production_id`. However, after the creation of these MO's, the related `move_finished_ids` will be recomputed:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/a2f072fe99a03aaf521bba1965e7f29a1c99e325/addons/mrp/models/mrp_production.py#L1089-L1093 However, the `move_dest_ids` of the created moves will be set to be either the `move_dest_ids` of their production (which is unset for all but the last one) or these of the first production of the same `production_group` that is these generated by a common production split: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/a2f072fe99a03aaf521bba1965e7f29a1c99e325/addons/mrp/models/mrp_production.py#L1263-L1267
Now, since neither are set in our use case, the `move_dest_ids` will not be set on the `move_finished_ids` which implies in particular that the mto link between our productions (but the last one) and the delivery is lost.

Fix:

Since we can not change the nature of the `move_dest_ids` and `created_production_id` in stable to become Many2Many fields, we need to find a way to propagate the `move_dest_ids` on moves without relying on the probably inaccurate value provided by the production. And, since the compute of the `move_finished_ids` could be launched at many other points than during a create process (because of the many dependencies), we can not solely rely on the creation context but rather new to provide a way to recreate the link from relations at any given point. We therefore rely on the `stock.reference`'s similar to what was done prior to 19.0 via the `procurement_group_ids`: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/132f042ca14012877f608783b57a0ca9c4e565f3/addons/mrp/models/mrp_production.py#L1198-L1202

opw-6188069

---
I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#266184
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#264951

[FIX] website: improve carousel accessibility
    
    To improve keyboard accessibility on carousels, the indicators container
    is not focusable anymore, and the indicators themselves now only have
    one focusable button at a time.
    The tab order is thus: previous button > active indicator > next button.
    (The previous and next button may both appear before.)
    You can still navigate among indicators with the left and right arrows,
    which also moves the focus to the newly targetted indicator.
    
    Note that other accessibility improvements remain to be done on the
    carousels (add a pause/play button on auto-sliding carousels, place the
    buttons before the carousel slide in the tab order, add some aria
    attributes (roledescription, live), adaptative labels...).

[FIX] website: make focus visible on carousel arrows
    
    When focusing manually (with tab / shift+tab) the previous/next arrows
    in carousels, it is hard to follow where the focus is, because there is
    no outline and the contrast is too small.
    
    This commit adds a specific outline if the button is `:focus-visible`
    (with both black and white to work on any background).

[IMP] website: pause carousel on focus within
    
    Carousels are paused on hover (or touchstart), but if the focus is
    inside one, it won't pause. That can make it hard to navigate within
    interactive carousels during the sliding interval (e.g. the dynamic
    products, which by default has 4 different products with 3 different
    focusable links/buttons).
    This commit applies the same behavior on focusin as Bootstrap's default
    on mouseover, and on focusout as on mouseout.

[IMP] website: support home/end keys on carousels

    When the focus is in a carousel, pressing the "home" key displays the
    first slide and pressing the "end" key displays the last slide.

task-5470023

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#266428
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#244939

## Issue
When logged in with a user who has the *Employee: Administrator* (`hr.group_hr_manager`) and the *User: Read his own attendances* (`hr_attendance.group_hr_attendance_own_reader`) groups, but not the *Officer: Manage attendances* (`hr_attendance.group_hr_attendance_officer`) group, the user won't be able to see their own attendance on their own employee's form view.

Additionally, a user without no Employee group but with the *Officer: Manage attendances* group could not see the attendance smart button on other employees form view.

## Steps to reproduce
1. Install *Attendances* (`hr_attendance`)
2. Set Marc Demo's groups:
    - *Employees: Administrator*
    - *Officer: Manage attendances*: unchecked
    - *User: Read his own attendances*: checked (implied by Role / User)
3. Log in as Marc Demo and open his own form in Employees
4. **The attendance smart button is missing, even though Marc Demo has the group to see his own attendance.**

For the second issue:
1. Set Marc Demo's groups:
    - *Employees: No*
    - *Officer: Manage attendances*: checked
    - *User: Read his own attendances*: checked (implied by Role / User)
2. Log in as Marc Demo and open another employee's form
3. **The attendance smart button is missing, even though Marc Demo has
the group to manage other employee's attendance.**

## Cause
There are two employee views defined in `hr_attendance`: `hr_employee_public_view_form` and `view_employee_form_inherit_hr_attendance`. The two views have different conditions under which the attendance smart button is displayed:
- In the public view, which is seen by users who do not have the *Employee: Administrator* group, the button is only displayed if the employee form is the one of the current user.

https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/b13d831e4c3c27ec7756302270f78c15f576a296/addons/hr_attendance/views/hr_employee_public_views.xml#L9-L15

https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/b13d831e4c3c27ec7756302270f78c15f576a296/addons/hr/models/hr_employee_public.py#L119-L123

**This means that a user without the _Employee: Administrator_ group cannot see the attendance button of other employees, even with the _Officer: Manage attendances_ group.** This view should take into account the *Attendance Manager* group.

- In the other view, which is displayed for users with the *Employee: Administrator* group, the button is only displayed for attendance officers.

https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/b13d831e4c3c27ec7756302270f78c15f576a296/addons/hr_attendance/views/hr_employee_view.xml#L24-L29

**This means that if a user is an Employee Administrator, but is not an Attendance Officer, they cannot see their own attendance, even with the "own attendance" group.** This second view should take into account the _User: Read his own attendances_ group.

opw-6167399

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#263826

**Steps to reproduce:**
- Go to Documents app in mobile
- Go to the kanban view
- Add some files and select one
- Click on `Info & Tags` button in the control panel
- Reload the page
- Chatter is not displayed but the button is still enabled
- Switching to the list view properly shows it

**Issue:**
We have two conflicting css styling on mobile:
- `overflow-hidden` was added for mobile to avoid multiple scroll bars
- `min-height: 100%` which is due to the default `o_kanban_ungrouped` in the controller css

This means that the element is present at the bottom of the page, but we can't get to it manually.
When re-enabling the action we are properly moved to the existing chatter (but we can't go back to the top).

Also the documents panel should have a single scrollbar to display all the records, but we still need a way to scroll the messages of the chatter.

**Fix:**
Set `min-height: 0;` for documents kanban to ensure the chatter is still visible and accessible on mobile by default. This makes the chatter take the full available height when displayed.

original overflow fix: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/commit/945b9e2b1c6752bd905695aa40b0babcf38c50cd

opw-6061993

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#118134
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#113168

This commit fixes several issues which can cause websocket messages to not be received:

1. If the IoT box does not have an IP when it first starts, the Websocket class will not be started (due to `@require_db`). It will remain closed even if the IoT box connects to the network shortly after.
2. If the IoT box does have an IP but can't reach the database when it starts, the Websocket client will crash due to a missing try/except around the request to get a session from the DB.
3. If the IoT box fails the first `send_all_devices` call, the websocket channel will not be set when the Websocket client starts. This causes no messages to be received, since it does not subscribe to the channel.

The changes are as follows:

1. The `@require_db` helper is removed from the Websocket client, and instead the server URL is provided explicitly.
2. Any exception raised by the session request is caught and logged, and the websocket can still continue connect attempts.
3. Instead of starting the websocket client after the first call to `send_all_devices`, it is started after the first *successful* call to `send_all_devices` so the channel is guaranteed to be set.
4. The closing status code is now logged as a warning instead of debug. This is to make it easier to troubleshoot websocket disconnections at a glance.

---
I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#266710

This commit fixes several issues which can cause websocket messages to not be received:

1. If the IoT box does not have an IP when it first starts, the Websocket class will not be started (due to `@require_db`). It will remain closed even if the IoT box connects to the network shortly after.
2. If the IoT box does have an IP but can't reach the database when it starts, the Websocket client will crash due to a missing try/except around the request to get a session from the DB.
3. If the IoT box fails the first `send_all_devices` call, the websocket channel will not be set when the Websocket client starts. This causes no messages to be received, since it does not subscribe to the channel.

The changes are as follows:

1. The `@require_db` helper is removed from the Websocket client, and instead the server URL is provided explicitly.
2. Any exception raised by the session request is caught and logged, and the websocket can still continue connect attempts.
3. Instead of starting the websocket client after the first call to `send_all_devices`, it is started after the first *successful* call to `send_all_devices` so the channel is guaranteed to be set.
4. The closing status code is now logged as a warning instead of debug. This is to make it easier to troubleshoot websocket disconnections at a glance.

---
I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr

The delivery transfer for a product tracked by serial number is not linked to the POS order when there is no available stock. When validating a POS delivery in real time, stock can split the transfer into a completed picking and a backorder (e.g. one line fully delivered with lots, another serial-tracked line with no stock and no serial number).

Steps to reproduce:
-------------------
* Setup two products: one tracked by qunatity with some quantity on-hand an other tracked by SN but no quantity on-hand
* Open Pos
* Sell in one order, both products without providing SN
* Validate payment
* Open Inventory: two deliveries sould exist under Inventory Overview of PoS Orders

> Observation:
The first picking shows the POS order as Source Document but the backorder has no source document and is not linked to the POS order.

Why the fix:
------------
Pos Origin (Source Document, POS order, session) was only written on the pickings returned by `_create_picking_from_pos_order_lines`, which did not include pickings created during `_action_done()`. Extend the write to the initial pickings and their backorders so every transfer stays tied to the originating `pos.order`.

opw-6090606

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#266111
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#259370

[FIX] website: improve carousel accessibility
    
    To improve keyboard accessibility on carousels, the indicators container
    is not focusable anymore, and the indicators themselves now only have
    one focusable button at a time.
    The tab order is thus: previous button > active indicator > next button.
    (The previous and next button may both appear before.)
    You can still navigate among indicators with the left and right arrows,
    which also moves the focus to the newly targetted indicator.
    
    Note that other accessibility improvements remain to be done on the
    carousels (add a pause/play button on auto-sliding carousels, place the
    buttons before the carousel slide in the tab order, add some aria
    attributes (roledescription, live), adaptative labels...).

[FIX] website: make focus visible on carousel arrows
    
    When focusing manually (with tab / shift+tab) the previous/next arrows
    in carousels, it is hard to follow where the focus is, because there is
    no outline and the contrast is too small.
    
    This commit adds a specific outline if the button is `:focus-visible`
    (with both black and white to work on any background).

[IMP] website: pause carousel on focus within
    
    Carousels are paused on hover (or touchstart), but if the focus is
    inside one, it won't pause. That can make it hard to navigate within
    interactive carousels during the sliding interval (e.g. the dynamic
    products, which by default has 4 different products with 3 different
    focusable links/buttons).
    This commit applies the same behavior on focusin as Bootstrap's default
    on mouseover, and on focusout as on mouseout.

[IMP] website: support home/end keys on carousels

    When the focus is in a carousel, pressing the "home" key displays the
    first slide and pressing the "end" key displays the last slide.

task-5470023

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#266428
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#244939

## Issue
When logged in with a user who has the *Employee: Administrator* (`hr.group_hr_manager`) and the *User: Read his own attendances* (`hr_attendance.group_hr_attendance_own_reader`) groups, but not the *Officer: Manage attendances* (`hr_attendance.group_hr_attendance_officer`) group, the user won't be able to see their own attendance on their own employee's form view.

Additionally, a user without no Employee group but with the *Officer: Manage attendances* group could not see the attendance smart button on other employees form view.

## Steps to reproduce
1. Install *Attendances* (`hr_attendance`)
2. Set Marc Demo's groups:
    - *Employees: Administrator*
    - *Officer: Manage attendances*: unchecked
    - *User: Read his own attendances*: checked (implied by Role / User)
3. Log in as Marc Demo and open his own form in Employees
4. **The attendance smart button is missing, even though Marc Demo has the group to see his own attendance.**

For the second issue:
1. Set Marc Demo's groups:
    - *Employees: No*
    - *Officer: Manage attendances*: checked
    - *User: Read his own attendances*: checked (implied by Role / User)
2. Log in as Marc Demo and open another employee's form
3. **The attendance smart button is missing, even though Marc Demo has
the group to manage other employee's attendance.**

## Cause
There are two employee views defined in `hr_attendance`: `hr_employee_public_view_form` and `view_employee_form_inherit_hr_attendance`. The two views have different conditions under which the attendance smart button is displayed:
- In the public view, which is seen by users who do not have the *Employee: Administrator* group, the button is only displayed if the employee form is the one of the current user.

https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/b13d831e4c3c27ec7756302270f78c15f576a296/addons/hr_attendance/views/hr_employee_public_views.xml#L9-L15

https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/b13d831e4c3c27ec7756302270f78c15f576a296/addons/hr/models/hr_employee_public.py#L119-L123

**This means that a user without the _Employee: Administrator_ group cannot see the attendance button of other employees, even with the _Officer: Manage attendances_ group.** This view should take into account the *Attendance Manager* group.

- In the other view, which is displayed for users with the *Employee: Administrator* group, the button is only displayed for attendance officers.

https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/b13d831e4c3c27ec7756302270f78c15f576a296/addons/hr_attendance/views/hr_employee_view.xml#L24-L29

**This means that if a user is an Employee Administrator, but is not an Attendance Officer, they cannot see their own attendance, even with the "own attendance" group.** This second view should take into account the _User: Read his own attendances_ group.

opw-6167399

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#263826

**Issue:**
The account_online_payment module overrides `action_draft` to raise a UserError for sepa_ct payments belonging to a batch with a `payment_online_status` = 'pending' or 'accepted'.
This blocks the bank statement unreconciliation process. When `delete_reconciled_line` is called, it tries to set payments to draft and re-post them, despite it being an internal process not a manual user modification.

**Steps to reproduce:**
- Setup a 'sepa_ct' payment method on a bank journal.
- Create a bill with a vendor with a trusted bank account.
- Create a payment for that bill with a 'sepa_ct' payment method.
- Add the payment to a batch.
- Manually set the `payment_online_status` = 'pending'.
- Create a bank transaction and reconcile it with the batch.
- Try to unreconcile the lines on the transaction
- Result: UserError 'You cannot modify a payment that has already been sent to the bank.'

**Fix:**
Pass a context flag to `action_draft` during the unreconciliation flow so that the validation is skipped when the call originates from the internal unreconcile flow.

OPW-6080464

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#118206
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#117921

**Steps to Reproduce**

1. Install the **Live Chat** module in version 18.4 or above.
2. Go to: **Settings → Users**
   * Open your user and change the access rights from **Live Chat / Administrator** to **Live Chat / User**.
   * Alternatively, create a new user giving him rights of the **Live Chat / User** group.
3. Login using the Live Chat user.
4. Open the **Live Chat** application and navigate to: **Live Chat → Sessions**
5. Open any existing session. The session and its messages are accessible without any issue.
6. In the search bar, click: **Filters → Custom Filter**
7. Select the field `Chatbot Messages (chatbot_message_ids)`. You will face the below traceback.

**Issue Description:**
The issue happens because `discuss.channel` records are accessible to users having the `im_livechat_group_user` group through the Sessions menu: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/459a775a066fe1465e53fc751045baed39f80118/addons/im_livechat/views/im_livechat_channel_views.xml#L310-L315

The field `chatbot_message_ids` is defined as:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/459a775a066fe1465e53fc751045baed39f80118/addons/im_livechat/models/discuss_channel.py#L165

This field points to the `chatbot.message` model, but access to that model is restricted to `im_livechat_group_manager` only:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/459a775a066fe1465e53fc751045baed39f80118/addons/im_livechat/security/ir.model.access.csv#L15

As a result, when a Live Chat user tries to use `chatbot_message_ids` in a custom filter, Odoo attempts to read `chatbot.message` records and raises an `AccessError`.

This issue started happening after the access rights changes introduced in pr : https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/201880

Specifically, the following ACL changes:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/201880/changes#diff-c1592d633a34db44a7cc2a527482cecc56127cbba72649e7318dcf63ccf477afR19-R20

**Solution:**
To fix this issue, added the group `im_livechat_group_manager` on the field `chatbot_message_ids` so only those user can access the field who belong to the group.

**Traceback:**

```.py
odoo.exceptions.AccessError: You are not allowed to access
'Chatbot Message' (chatbot.message) records.

This operation is allowed for the following groups:
        - Live Chat/Administrator

Contact your administrator to request access if necessary.
```

opw - [6169395]
upg - [4274573]



Description of the issue/feature this PR addresses:

Current behavior before PR:

Desired behavior after PR is merged:

---
I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#264682

**Steps to reproduce:**
- Go to Documents app in mobile
- Go to the kanban view
- Add some files and select one
- Click on `Info & Tags` button in the control panel
- Reload the page
- Chatter is not displayed but the button is still enabled
- Switching to the list view properly shows it

**Issue:**
We have two conflicting css styling on mobile:
- `overflow-hidden` was added for mobile to avoid multiple scroll bars
- `min-height: 100%` which is due to the default `o_kanban_ungrouped` in the controller css

This means that the element is present at the bottom of the page, but we can't get to it manually.
When re-enabling the action we are properly moved to the existing chatter (but we can't go back to the top).

Also the documents panel should have a single scrollbar to display all the records, but we still need a way to scroll the messages of the chatter.

**Fix:**
Set `min-height: 0;` for documents kanban to ensure the chatter is still visible and accessible on mobile by default. This makes the chatter take the full available height when displayed.

original overflow fix: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/commit/945b9e2b1c6752bd905695aa40b0babcf38c50cd

opw-6061993

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#118134
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#113168

[FIX] website: improve carousel accessibility
    
    To improve keyboard accessibility on carousels, the indicators container
    is not focusable anymore, and the indicators themselves now only have
    one focusable button at a time.
    The tab order is thus: previous button > active indicator > next button.
    (The previous and next button may both appear before.)
    You can still navigate among indicators with the left and right arrows,
    which also moves the focus to the newly targetted indicator.
    
    Note that other accessibility improvements remain to be done on the
    carousels (add a pause/play button on auto-sliding carousels, place the
    buttons before the carousel slide in the tab order, add some aria
    attributes (roledescription, live), adaptative labels...).

[FIX] website: make focus visible on carousel arrows
    
    When focusing manually (with tab / shift+tab) the previous/next arrows
    in carousels, it is hard to follow where the focus is, because there is
    no outline and the contrast is too small.
    
    This commit adds a specific outline if the button is `:focus-visible`
    (with both black and white to work on any background).

[IMP] website: pause carousel on focus within
    
    Carousels are paused on hover (or touchstart), but if the focus is
    inside one, it won't pause. That can make it hard to navigate within
    interactive carousels during the sliding interval (e.g. the dynamic
    products, which by default has 4 different products with 3 different
    focusable links/buttons).
    This commit applies the same behavior on focusin as Bootstrap's default
    on mouseover, and on focusout as on mouseout.

[IMP] website: support home/end keys on carousels

    When the focus is in a carousel, pressing the "home" key displays the
    first slide and pressing the "end" key displays the last slide.

task-5470023

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#266428
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#244939

## Issue
When logged in with a user who has the *Employee: Administrator* (`hr.group_hr_manager`) and the *User: Read his own attendances* (`hr_attendance.group_hr_attendance_own_reader`) groups, but not the *Officer: Manage attendances* (`hr_attendance.group_hr_attendance_officer`) group, the user won't be able to see their own attendance on their own employee's form view.

Additionally, a user without no Employee group but with the *Officer: Manage attendances* group could not see the attendance smart button on other employees form view.

## Steps to reproduce
1. Install *Attendances* (`hr_attendance`)
2. Set Marc Demo's groups:
    - *Employees: Administrator*
    - *Officer: Manage attendances*: unchecked
    - *User: Read his own attendances*: checked (implied by Role / User)
3. Log in as Marc Demo and open his own form in Employees
4. **The attendance smart button is missing, even though Marc Demo has the group to see his own attendance.**

For the second issue:
1. Set Marc Demo's groups:
    - *Employees: No*
    - *Officer: Manage attendances*: checked
    - *User: Read his own attendances*: checked (implied by Role / User)
2. Log in as Marc Demo and open another employee's form
3. **The attendance smart button is missing, even though Marc Demo has
the group to manage other employee's attendance.**

## Cause
There are two employee views defined in `hr_attendance`: `hr_employee_public_view_form` and `view_employee_form_inherit_hr_attendance`. The two views have different conditions under which the attendance smart button is displayed:
- In the public view, which is seen by users who do not have the *Employee: Administrator* group, the button is only displayed if the employee form is the one of the current user.

https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/b13d831e4c3c27ec7756302270f78c15f576a296/addons/hr_attendance/views/hr_employee_public_views.xml#L9-L15

https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/b13d831e4c3c27ec7756302270f78c15f576a296/addons/hr/models/hr_employee_public.py#L119-L123

**This means that a user without the _Employee: Administrator_ group cannot see the attendance button of other employees, even with the _Officer: Manage attendances_ group.** This view should take into account the *Attendance Manager* group.

- In the other view, which is displayed for users with the *Employee: Administrator* group, the button is only displayed for attendance officers.

https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/b13d831e4c3c27ec7756302270f78c15f576a296/addons/hr_attendance/views/hr_employee_view.xml#L24-L29

**This means that if a user is an Employee Administrator, but is not an Attendance Officer, they cannot see their own attendance, even with the "own attendance" group.** This second view should take into account the _User: Read his own attendances_ group.

opw-6167399

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#263826

**Steps to reproduce:**
- Go to Documents app in mobile
- Go to the kanban view
- Add some files and select one
- Click on `Info & Tags` button in the control panel
- Reload the page
- Chatter is not displayed but the button is still enabled
- Switching to the list view properly shows it

**Issue:**
We have two conflicting css styling on mobile:
- `overflow-hidden` was added for mobile to avoid multiple scroll bars
- `min-height: 100%` which is due to the default `o_kanban_ungrouped` in the controller css

This means that the element is present at the bottom of the page, but we can't get to it manually.
When re-enabling the action we are properly moved to the existing chatter (but we can't go back to the top).

Also the documents panel should have a single scrollbar to display all the records, but we still need a way to scroll the messages of the chatter.

**Fix:**
Set `min-height: 0;` for documents kanban to ensure the chatter is still visible and accessible on mobile by default. This makes the chatter take the full available height when displayed.

original overflow fix: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/commit/945b9e2b1c6752bd905695aa40b0babcf38c50cd

opw-6061993

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#118134
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#113168

Before this commit, if the `_l10n_mx_edi_cfdi_invoice_append_addendas` method was executed more than once on the same invoice, the resulting CFDI would contain multiple `<cfdi:Addenda>` nodes.

This occurred because the method manually injects the new Addenda string at the end of the XML without checking if one was already present from a previous execution.

According to the SAT's Anexo 20 and the CFDI 4.0 XSD, the Addenda must be a single node and the last element of the Comprobante. Duplicating root-level nodes like `cfdi:Addenda` is a bad XML formation practice that can cause rejection by the recipient's automated systems.

This fix ensures the CFDI structure remains valid by:
1. Searching for an existing `{*}Addenda` node in the CFDI string.
2. Removing the old node before reconstructing the XML.
3. Preventing the string replacement logic from stacking multiple Addenda blocks.

This ensures that the CFDI remains clean and compliant with the official standard even if the process is triggered multiple times.

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#109760

When a sale order containing a product with a custom (free text) attribute was settled in POS, the order line displayed the placeholder attribute value name (e.g. "Custom") instead of the actual text entered by the customer.

Steps to reproduce:
-------------------
* Create a product with a free text attribute (create_variant='no_variant', is_custom=True)
* Go to the website's shop (works best in a new private tab)
* Fill the free text attribute and add the product to the cart
* Click on checkout
* In POS, open Quotation/Order and settle the order

> Observation:
the order line shows "Custom" instead of the text

Why the fix:
------------
`SaleOrderLine._load_pos_data_fields` was not exposing `product_no_variant_attribute_value_ids` nor `product_custom_attribute_value_ids`, so the JS `settleSO` function received no attribute data on the `line` object. As a result, the new POS order line was created with empty `attribute_value_ids` and `custom_attribute_value_ids`, leaving `constructFullProductName` unable to find the custom text.

The fix adds both fields to `_load_pos_data_fields` and updates `settleSO` to use them when building the new POS order line. The dynamic fetch path (`_getSaleOrder`) is also updated to explicitly read the `product.attribute.custom.value` records so the data is available for orders loaded at runtime.

opw-5958678

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#265491
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#251993

### Issue before this commit:
Opening the Purchase Matching wizard would crash if the vendor bill contained lines with a description and a Unit of Measure (UoM), but no product selected.

### Steps to reproduce the issue:
1. Enable Units of Measure in Settings
2. Create and confirm a Vendor Bill setting a description and a UoM, but leave the Product field empty.
3. Click on "Purchase matching" smart button
4. The system throws a traceback with the error: "The unit of measure Unit defined on the order line doesn't belong to the same category as the unit of measure False defined on the product."

### Cause of the issue:
In the purchase.bill.line.match model, the field product_uom_qty was computed by calling _compute_quantity using line.product_uom_id. Since product_uom_id is a related field on product_id.uom_id, it returns False when no product is set. The UoM conversion logic cannot handle a False destination category, leading to the crash.

### Reason to introduce the fix:
Make purchase matching robust when imported vendor bills contain lines identified only by their description and not by a product. Note that for `purchase.bill.line.match` corresponding to an account.move.line but not related to any product, the `product_uom_qty` should match the quantity of the `aml_id` instead of attempting a UoM conversion based on a missing 
product UoM for the behavior to be consistent with the inverse method:

https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/59d6232979b8499fde6cb700df1870e2e38d0d3e/addons/purchase/models/purchase_bill_line_match.py#L45-L54

opw-5911526

---
I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#266269
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#257827

Problem:
The previous fix (replacing '&' with '+' in _replace_characters_SEPA) was applied globally, affecting both reference/identifier fields and human-readable fields such as <Nm> (partner name) and address lines.

As a result, a partner named "test & test GMBH" was exported as:
  <Nm>test + test GMBH</Nm>
instead of the expected:
  <Nm>test & test GMBH</Nm>

This caused bank file rejections because '&' is the correct XML encoding of '&' and is accepted by banks in human-readable fields.

Root cause:
ISO 20022 / EPC217-08 distinguishes two categories of data elements:

- Reference/identifier fields (InstrId, Ustrd, etc.): must use the restricted basic Latin character set — '&' is not allowed and must be replaced with '+'.

- Human-readable fields (Nm, AdrLine, etc.): may contain the extended Latin character set — '&' is valid and must be preserved so lxml can XML-escape it to '&' in the output.

Fix:
Revert the global '&' → '+' replacement in _replace_characters_SEPA so that '&' is preserved for name/address fields. The replacement of '&' with '+' for reference/identifier fields is already handled explicitly at the call sites in _get_CdtTrfTxInf (InstrId, Ustrd) via .replace('&', '+') before sanitize_communication is called.

ref commit : https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/pull/110809/changes/9e698e4ac9fdf66189ff6712f90a144560a1b484
documentation https://www.europeanpaymentscouncil.eu/sites/default/files/KB/files/EPC217-08%20Draft%20Best%20Practices%20SEPA%20Requirements%20for%20Character%20Set%20v1.1.pdf:

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#118511
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#115409

Problem:
The previous fix (replacing '&' with '+' in _replace_characters_SEPA) was applied globally, affecting both reference/identifier fields and human-readable fields such as <Nm> (partner name) and address lines.

As a result, a partner named "test & test GMBH" was exported as:
  <Nm>test + test GMBH</Nm>
instead of the expected:
  <Nm>test & test GMBH</Nm>

This caused bank file rejections because '&' is the correct XML encoding of '&' and is accepted by banks in human-readable fields.

Root cause:
ISO 20022 / EPC217-08 distinguishes two categories of data elements:

- Reference/identifier fields (InstrId, Ustrd, etc.): must use the restricted basic Latin character set — '&' is not allowed and must be replaced with '+'.

- Human-readable fields (Nm, AdrLine, etc.): may contain the extended Latin character set — '&' is valid and must be preserved so lxml can XML-escape it to '&' in the output.

Fix:
Revert the global '&' → '+' replacement in _replace_characters_SEPA so that '&' is preserved for name/address fields. The replacement of '&' with '+' for reference/identifier fields is already handled explicitly at the call sites in _get_CdtTrfTxInf (InstrId, Ustrd) via .replace('&', '+') before sanitize_communication is called.

ref commit : https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/pull/110809/changes/9e698e4ac9fdf66189ff6712f90a144560a1b484
documentation https://www.europeanpaymentscouncil.eu/sites/default/files/KB/files/EPC217-08%20Draft%20Best%20Practices%20SEPA%20Requirements%20for%20Character%20Set%20v1.1.pdf:

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#118511
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#115409

### Issue before this commit:
When confirming a Sale Order with multi-step delivery routes (Pick + Deliver), the generated Manufacturing Order did not inherit the project_id from the Sale Order, even though the project was correctly set on the SO.

### Steps to reproduce the issue:
1. Download Inventory, Sales, PLM, Project
2. Enable multi-step routes in settings and unarchive MTO from routes
3. Go to Products and modify
	1. Furniture Assembly inserting Project in "Create on Order" attribute and a test project template
	2. Drawer selecting MTO and Manifacture in Inventory tab
4. Create a new quotation inserting 2 products: Furniture Assembly and Drawer and confirm it
5. Go to "Manufacturing" smart button
6. See in Miscellaneous tab the Project is setted as default
7. Go to warehouses, select the WH of your company and select Pick then Deliver (2 steps) as Outgoing Shipments
8. Go to Routes, select Deliver in two steps (pick + ship) and change "Destination location" of "Pull From"  from Parteners/Customers into WH/output
9. Go to Rules:
	1. "Pull From" (the one with Partener/Customers as destination location and MTO as route): change "Destination location" of from Parteners/Customers into WH/output
	2. "Push To" (the one with Partener/Customers as destination location and with the deliver in 2 steps as route): change action from "Push To" to "Pull from"
10. Create a new quotation inserting 2 products: Furniture Assembly and Drawer and confirm it
5. Go to "Manufacturing" smart button
6. See in Miscellaneous tab the Project is not setted

### Cause of the issue:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/d1955028bb95eff8d33c1c2b1c211d8520bb33a2/addons/sale_project_stock/models/stock_move.py#L71-L76
This function retrieves the project only based on the sale_line_id, which is correctly populated in a one-step delivery because the procurement is directly linked to the Sales Order (SO).
However, the sale_line_id is not propagated to procurements that are not directly linked to the SO.
In this scenario, with a two-step delivery, there are two stock moves: from Stock to WH/Output, and from WH/Output to the Customer. Only the second move (WH/Output > Customer) is linked to the SO, while this information is not propagated to the first move. As a result, the project_id information is lost.

### Reason to introduce the fix:
Be sure that the project is automatically setted in the MO when a SO is confirmed whatever the intial delivery configuration is.

opw-5913988

---
I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#266808
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#261565

Problem: When both line discounts and global discounts are applied on a product in an invoice, the method `_add_and_round_raw_gross_total_excluded_and_discount` does not return the exact raw_gross_total_excluded before the modification done by other AccountTax helper methods, such as dispatching and squashing global discount lines.

Current Behavior: The calculation is done in the wrong order of operations. For example, there is an invoice for Product A valued at $100 with a discount of 10% and a global discount of $10. The raw_total_excluded will be $80 after the both discounts. The discount_factor is based on only the line discount of 10%. The formula of the current calculation for raw_gross_total_excluded is: (raw_total_excluded / (1 - (line_discount / 100))) - global_discount = (80 / 0.90) - (-10)
= 98.889
This does not equal the expected outcome of $100.

Expected Behavior: Based on the previous example, the formula for the calculation should be:
(raw_total_excluded - global_discount) / (1 - (line_discount/100)) = (80 - (-10)) / 0.9
= 100
The global discount needs to be added back to the raw_total_excluded to get the line discounted amount in order to divide by the discount_factor to gain the expected raw_gross_total_excluded before taxes and discounts.

Steps to reproduce the issue:
- Bug was encountered when implementing a global discount solution for l10n_co_dian.
- Create an invoice with a product line and in-line discount and another line for global discount
- Setup the base lines for the invoice and attempt the following:
 - _dispatch_global_discount_lines
 - _squash_global_discount_lines
 - _add_and_round_raw_gross_total_excluded_and_discount

opw-5412446


---
I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#262137

…lit for same-product lines

When doing an intercompany Sale->Purchase with multiple lines having the same products, the receipt picking would be incorrectly assigned:
- Enable Inter-Company Transactions on both companies (Create and validate)
- Create SO in company A to company B with 2 lines having the same product P, Confirm. => Delivery in company A, Purchase and Receipts in company will be created => The SO/PO/Delivery/Receipt will all have 2 lines
- Validate delivery => On the receipt, the 2 units of P are reserved on the 1st move, and the 2nd move is not reserved.


https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/b4816051-120e-4226-9228-fd552649d5ef


---

### Test result without fix:
```
2026-04-23 13:16:44,577 48027 INFO oes_test_18.0 odoo.addons.sale_purchase_stock_inter_company_rules.tests.test_inter_company_so_to_po: Starting TestInterCompanySaleToPurchaseWithStock.test_02_inter_company_multiple_lines_with_same_product ... 
2026-04-23 13:16:44,949 48027 INFO oes_test_18.0 odoo.addons.sale_purchase_stock_inter_company_rules.tests.test_inter_company_so_to_po: ====================================================================== 
2026-04-23 13:16:44,949 48027 ERROR oes_test_18.0 odoo.addons.sale_purchase_stock_inter_company_rules.tests.test_inter_company_so_to_po: FAIL: TestInterCompanySaleToPurchaseWithStock.test_02_inter_company_multiple_lines_with_same_product
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/home/odoo/Odoo/src/18.0/enterprise/sale_purchase_stock_inter_company_rules/tests/test_inter_company_so_to_po.py", line 109, in test_02_inter_company_multiple_lines_with_same_product
    self.assertRecordValues(purchase_from_a.picking_ids.move_ids, [
  File "/home/odoo/Odoo/src/18.0/odoo/odoo/tests/common.py", line 709, in assertRecordValues
    self.assertSequenceEqual(expected_reformatted, record_reformatted, seq_type=list)
AssertionError: Lists differ: [{'pr[18 chars]0, 'quantity': 1.0}, {'product_uom_qty': 1.0, 'quantity': 1.0}] != [{'pr[18 chars]0, 'quantity': 2.0}, {'product_uom_qty': 1.0, 'quantity': 0.0}]

First differing element 0:
{'product_uom_qty': 1.0, 'quantity': 1.0}
{'product_uom_qty': 1.0, 'quantity': 2.0}

- [{'product_uom_qty': 1.0, 'quantity': 1.0},
?                                       ^

+ [{'product_uom_qty': 1.0, 'quantity': 2.0},
?                                       ^

-  {'product_uom_qty': 1.0, 'quantity': 1.0}]
?                                       ^

+  {'product_uom_qty': 1.0, 'quantity': 0.0}]
?                                       ^

```

OPW-6145683

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#114873

Purpose:
- The new global Rate field now provides a unified way to define pay rates for work entry types across all countries, making the AU-specific Penalty Rate redundant.
- Remove duplicate rate definitions in AU payroll by merging Penalty Rate into the global Rate field, avoiding user confusion and ensuring consistent overtime computation in payslips.
- Ensure AU logic fully relies on the global Rate while preserving existing behavior for STP Code, casual loading, and leave loading.

This PR includes:
- Removed Penalty Rate field from model and views.
- Updated computation logic to rely on global Rate while preserving AU-specific behavior based on STP Code.
- Preserved STP-based logic and loading behaviors.
- Hidden the 'Add on Monthly Wage' checkbox for AU because its behavior is
  already fully handled via STP code logic, making the field redundant/confusing.
- Added upgrade script to migrate existing Penalty Rate values into Rate to maintain backward compatibility.
- Converted Penalty Rate into Rate format during upgrade: Penalty Rate stores only the extra percentage (e.g., +50%), while Rate represents the full multiplier (100% base(Default) + extra), so where penalty rate is 50%, it becomes 150% (1.5) in Rate.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: Brief overview of AU payslip computation behavior.

Example: hourly wage = 10, Rate = 1.5, leave loading = 17.5%, casual loading = 0.25

1) For normal work entries, the global Rate value is combined with the employee
    casual loading. In AU payroll, casual loading is additive and must be added
    directly on top of the Rate multiplier instead of being multiplied separately.
    - Example:
      final calculation = 1.5 + 0.25 = 1.75
      amount = 10 * hours * 1.75

2) For AU paid time off entries (AU.PT), the leave loading percentage must be applied
    separately and the computation must stop after applying leave loading, meaning
    casual loading must not be added on top of it.
    - Example:
      final calculation = 1.175
      amount = 10 * hours * 1.175

3) For overtime work entries using STP code 'T', casual loading must also be
    ignored. These entries should only use the Rate multiplier configured on the
    work entry type.
    - Example:
      final calculation = 1.5
      amount = 10 * hours * 1.5

- Related Upgrade PR: https://github.com/odoo/upgrade/pull/9557

task-5406660

It is possible to order as many products as we want of a rental product
that synchronizes shifts depending on a specific service

Steps to reproduce:
1. Install website_sale_renting_planning module
2. Go to Rental > Products and create a new product "test" with Sales enabled, Product Type "Service", Plan Services enabled as "Developer", in the Sales tab, enable Is Published and in the Rental prices tab, create a pricing for Daily period
3. In the General Information tab, click on the internal link to "Developer"
4. Enable Sync Shifts and Rental Orders
5. Go to the eCommerce website and search for product "test"
6. You can add as many quantity of the product to your cart

Issue:
We don't limit the maximum quantity of the product

Solution:
Look through the renting availabilities of the product and set the
maximum quantity to the minimum of the availabilities relevant to the
renting dates selected

opw-6009928

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#118332
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#111793

## Problem

When creating a database with a country selected (e.g. India, or any 
country with a localization module), installing point_of_sale with demo 
data enabled raises a UserError about a missing bank journal, causing 
the entire demo data installation to fail with this warning:

  Module point_of_sale demo data failed to install, installed without demo data

The issue does NOT occur when no country is selected during database 
creation, because Odoo falls back to generic_coa which sets up all 
journals before POS demo data loads.

## Root Cause

Module loading follows this sequence:
  data -> demo -> state='installed' -> commit

When a localization module (e.g. l10n_in) reaches the installed state, 
the IrModule.write override detects the missing chart template on the 
main company and stores try_loading on registry._auto_install_template.

However, this deferred loading is only executed in _register_hook, which 
runs after ALL modules have finished loading.

When point_of_sale loads after l10n_in but before _register_hook fires, 
its demo data calls load_onboarding_furniture_scenario() which calls 
_create_journal_and_payment_methods(). At this point the bank journal 
from the localization has not been created yet, causing the crash.

Debug proof:
  With India selected at DB creation:
    Chart Template: False
    Journals available: Cash Furn. Shop (cash), Point of Sale (general)
    Bank journal found: False  <- causes UserError

  With no country selected:
    Chart Template: generic_coa
    Journals available: Bank (bank), Cash (cash), Customer Invoices (sale), ...
    Bank journal found: True   <- works fine

## Fix

Add a cr.precommit call in IrModule.write to execute 
_auto_install_template. This ensures the chart template and its journals 
get loaded at the end of the localization module's loading cycle (at its 
commit), making the bank journal available for subsequent modules like 
point_of_sale during their loading phase.

The _register_hook fallback is kept as a safety measure and now simply 
acts as a no-op if the precommit already handled the installation.

## Steps to Reproduce

1. Create a new database from /web/database/manager
2. Enable Load Demo Data
3. Select any country (e.g. India)
4. Login and install point_of_sale
5. Observe warning: Module point_of_sale demo data failed to install

## Expected Result

point_of_sale demo data installs successfully regardless of which 
country/localization is selected at database creation.

Problem
------------------
When creating group allocations, when the allocation type is accrual and the start date is set in the past, the newly created allocations have the accrual amounts at 0. To reproduce:
1. Create an accrual plan with an easily measurable milestone (e.g. 1 day every day)
2. From the allocations view -> New Group Allocation
3. Enter the following values: Grant -> By Employee Employees -> select your employee Time Off Type -> Paid Time Off (doesn't matter too much) Allocation Type -> Based on Accrual Plan Validity Period -> any date a few days in the past (Personally I tested with 1/1/2025 and no end date) Allocation -> Keep at 0 Allocate Time Off
4. Go to the newly created allocation The allocation amount is 0.

Reason
----------------------
When creating group allocations, the `hr.leave.allocation.generate.multi.wizard` calls the `_process_accrual_plans()` method to compute the accruals, but when the allocations are created, the nextcall and lastcall fields are set, so the accruals are not computed and the scheduled action also does nothing until the nextcall date. The onchange method manually sets the nextcall date to False so the accruals are processed.

Solution
------------------
Created a method to get the fields that need to be set to calculate the initial accrual amounts from the start date, which is called both in the onchange and to batch write in the wizard before accrual plans are processed. The wizard checks the duration values before overwriting the number_of_days field, since user manually setting the amount should overwrite the calculations.

task-4938695

Description of the issue/feature this PR addresses:

Current behavior before PR:

Desired behavior after PR is merged:




---
I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr

**Issue**
In subcontracting, deleting a raw move line and adding a new one in the same editing flow can lead to a validation error during production recording.

**Steps to reproduce**
- Create a subcontracting product with a comp A
- Create and confirm a purchase order of that product (with the subcontracting partner)
- Open the associated delivery
- Open the move details (hamburger button)
- Delete the move line linked to the comp A
- Create a new move line for a comp B with a quantity of 1
- Record the production
-> A validation error occurs: the mandatory field `product_uom_id` is not set.

**Cause**
The regression comes from this commit: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/54f10b56f577ad9ed5575bd396dba7d20d22fc2e

While assigning `move_raw_ids`, the inverse method is triggered:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/9267b2d1a9b2d2d6a33eceab07d572406c68c723/addons/mrp_subcontracting/models/mrp_production.py#L34
At this stage, newly added lines are still virtual records (`line`):
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/9267b2d1a9b2d2d6a33eceab07d572406c68c723/addons/mrp_subcontracting/models/mrp_production.py#L38
The previous implementation directly unlinked removed move lines (see commit https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/54f10b56f577ad9ed5575bd396dba7d20d22fc2e):
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/9267b2d1a9b2d2d6a33eceab07d572406c68c723/addons/mrp_subcontracting/models/mrp_production.py#L40-L43
Which will eventually flush and invalidate all the cache:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/0e78b4fd2ab904f2e12107cb6ff7cc11d512259f/odoo/models.py#L4666
And since `line` is a virtual record (not in db), its associated values will be reset, among those, `product_uom_id`.
Later, when the move line is reassigned:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/0e78b4fd2ab904f2e12107cb6ff7cc11d512259f/addons/mrp_subcontracting/models/mrp_production.py#L49
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/0e78b4fd2ab904f2e12107cb6ff7cc11d512259f/odoo/models.py#L5223-L5228

the validation fails because the virtual line no longer contains the required values.

**Additional note**
An alternative could have been using Command but since this line:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/0e78b4fd2ab904f2e12107cb6ff7cc11d512259f/addons/mrp_subcontracting/models/mrp_production.py#L42
can not be converted to:
`Command.set([line.id for line in lines])`
because `lines` may also contain virtual records.
This causes an invalid quantity for the move. Indeed, even if the command operator would update the quantity
on the `move_line` correctly, it won't for the quantity of the `move` because of its associated compute method:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/26ba95ac1c5bbb24975efb1a6f53c1ab47b61532/addons/stock/models/stock_move.py#L399-L400
that relies on `.ids`, which is `[]` on virtual records.
Therefore, keep the change minimal.

opw-6133281

__

## Short functional explanation of the error
When confirming a Purchase Order holding lines with an analytic distribution that has been manually added, and creating a vendor bill out of this PO using the Auto-Complete field. When we change the account of that line, the line loses the manually added Analytic Distribution.

## Reproduction Steps
1. Go to Accounting. Click on the tab Configuration; under the Analytic Accounting section, click on Analytic Distribution Models.
2. Create an Analytic Distribution Model for a product.
3. Go to Purchase. Create a new PO, set a Vendor and select the product you created the Analytic Distribution Model for. On the right side of the form, click on the view menu and check Analytic Distribution to make it appear.
4. Click on the Analytic Distribution of the product and add a new one; for example, select Administrative in the Departments section.
5. Confirm order.
6. Go to Accounting and click on the Vendors tab > Bills. Create a new bill, and in the field Auto-Complete, select the PO you just created.
7. Change the account of the line.

### Expected behavior
Only the account should be changed on the line.

### Unexpected behavior
The manually added Analytic Distribution has disappeared.

## Origin of the issue
When we change the `account_id` field, the compute method `_compute_analytic_distribution` is triggered. This method retrieves the related distributions of the line:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/af32885ec5f07d492f3b8e8fff1785996a739f72/addons/account/models/account_move_line.py#L1154 which, in the context of Purchase, calls this method: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/af32885ec5f07d492f3b8e8fff1785996a739f72/addons/purchase/models/account_invoice.py#L540-L545 We retrieve the distribution of the related line using `self.purchase_line_id.analytic_distribution`. However, this code isn't triggered when the move line has an analytic distribution, even though the related line `purchase_line_id` might have one! Therefore, we need to execute that code whether or not our move line has an analytic distribution.
Note: the same behavior is to avoid when creating invoices for
quotations.
__
opw-6062466

**Steps to reproduce**
1. Create a customer invoice with Invoice Date `2025-05-27` and accounting Date `2026-05-04`.
2. On the *Other Info* tab, set the Delivery Date to `2026-05-04` and post the invoice.
3. Generate the FA(3) XML.

**Issue**
`P_6` is omitted from the payload even though the delivery date differs from the invoice issue date.

The FA(3) information sheet (Warsaw, September 2025, binding from 1 February 2026) defines `P_6` as *"the date of delivery [...] if such date is specified and differs from the date of issue of the invoice"*, where the date of issue is `P_1` (Art. 106e sec. 1 item 1 of the VAT Act). In Odoo `P_1` maps to `invoice_date`, but the template at
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/4890b8021af2a5c025944220043d295bb7bbbb9b/addons/l10n_pl_edi/data/fa3_template.xml#L132 compares `delivery_date` against `invoice.date`, the accounting/entry date. When the invoice is posted on the delivery day the accounting date equals the delivery date, the guard evaluates to false, and `P_6` is wrongly dropped.

Comparing against `invoice.invoice_date` aligns the guard with `P_1` as the spec requires.

Ticket [link](https://www.odoo.com/odoo/project.task/6211119)
opw-6211119

### Issue before this commit:
Importing a simplified Italian electronic invoice or credit note (e.g., TD08) fails with a float division by 0 traceback if a document line consists entirely of taxes (where the total line amount equals the tax amount).

### Steps to reproduce the issue:
1. Download Accounting and l10n_it
2. Switch to IT company
3. Go to Vendors > Refunds
4. Try to import the xml from the ticket

### Cause of the issue:
The XML parser attempts to dynamically calculate the tax percentage using the formula tax_amount / (amount - tax_amount). When a line is purely a tax adjustment, the taxable base (amount - tax_amount) evaluates to exactly zero, triggering the critical division by zero crash.
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/e3b0ca11d99b2ef819cdad68b169112cd73668b6/addons/l10n_it_edi/models/account_move.py#L1863-L1867

### Reason to introduce the fix:
To ensure Odoo successfully imports valid, tax-only EDI documents already accepted by the Agenzia delle Entrate.

Ticket [link](https://www.odoo.com/odoo/project.task/6217373)
opw-6217373

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#266374

## **Issue:**
When creating an upsell after a subscription is invoiced, the qty_invoiced
field on the sale order line was showing 0.0, even though related invoice lines
existed.

## **Steps to reproduce:**
- Create and confirm a subscription.
- Update the subscription `next_invoice_date` to a future date.
- Generate an invoice for the subscription.
- Create an upsell order from the subscription.
- Confirm and invoice the upsell order.
- Open the upsell sale order and check qty_invoiced.

## **Before Fix:**
In _compute_qty_invoiced(), upsell lines have recurring_invoice=True and
order_id.state='sale', so they are processed by
_get_subscription_qty_invoiced(). The deferred date filter excludes their AMLs
because of this condition,
https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/2ed34cc902d148fba7a88c159cd5c67a62112865/sale_subscription/models/sale_order_line.py#L189
returning 0.0 in the result dict. Since recurring_invoice=True, upsell lines
never reach other_lines and super()._compute_qty_invoiced() is never called,
causing qty_invoiced to fallback to its default value 0.0.

After Fix 1 routes upsell lines to super()._compute_qty_invoiced(), a
second issue is revealed. The _get_invoice_lines() overridden and applies
a line.date > last_invoice_date filter. Since this condition
fails and returns an empty recordset, leaving qty_invoiced at 0.0.

## **After Fix:**
1. In _compute_qty_invoiced(), upsell lines are routed to other_lines to
bypass  _get_subscription_qty_invoiced() and delegate to
super()._compute_qty_invoiced().

2. In _get_invoice_lines(), upsell lines are excluded from the date-based
filtering and letting upsell lines use the base _get_invoice_lines method.

OPW - 6213551

Steps to reproduce : [Video](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1px4J2oZJUtfBwIA_syQfdgXfRRg_6EBg/view?usp=drive_link)

OPW - 6213551

The _get_putaway_location() method tries to determine a location in which a product can be stored:

https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/441a6d1b928a44b9a760f926180a925159edff3e/addons/stock/models/product_strategy.py#L175-L181

When no location can be used, the loop iterates over the whole list
to call _get_weight() method on each one.

We propose to batch the call to _get_weight() method for all locations
that will be used and store the result in a dictionnary passed in the context
to avoid computing them several times during the same delivery preparation.

Benchmarks
--------------

For one product with no possible location:

| No locations | Before PR | After PR |
|------------|--------|-------|
|       780  |    9 s  |   < 1 s |

For 98 products that can be placed in various locations:

| No locations | Before PR | After PR |
|------------|--------|-------|
|       6000  |    20 s |    8 s |

For one product that could be placed in any of the indicated locations, we will compute the weights for every location while only the first one would have been computed without the fix:

| No locations | Before PR | After PR |
|--------------|-----------|----------|
|          500 |     41 ms |   524 ms |
|         2000 |     97 ms |   2.02 s |
|        10000 |    513 ms |  10.83 s |

opw-5949370

---
I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr

### Issue
In the Italian annual tax report, both VL3/VL4 and VL32/VL33 values could be displayed at the same time

However, according to the report logic, only the positive balance should be shown for each pair:
- VL3 (Tax Due) or VL4 (Tax Credit)
- VL32 (Tax Due) or VL33 (Tax Credit)

The other one should stay 0
If the global balance is null, both can be 0

### Cause
The lines VL3, VL4, VL32, and VL33 were using the shortcut field `aggregation_formula` directly on the `account.report.line` record
This shortcut format does not evaluate or support conditional subformulas like `if_above(EUR(0))`
As a result, the report computed and displayed both lines of each pair without filtering out the negative or unwanted values

### Steps to reproduce
- Install `l10n_it` and `accountant` and switch to IT Company
- Create a balanced Journal Entry for any account
- Add the Tax Grid v20 on one of the lines to impact the annual report
- Open the `Annual Tax Report (IT)` 
- Go to the `VL` section
- Check the value of VL3/VL4 and VL32/VL33
After the fix, only one value can be positive and the other 0

Ticket [link](https://www.odoo.com/odoo/project.task/6212694)
opw-6212694

### Issue before this commit:
Importing a simplified Italian electronic invoice or credit note (e.g., TD08) fails with a float division by 0 traceback if a document line consists entirely of taxes (where the total line amount equals the tax amount).

### Steps to reproduce the issue:
1. Download Accounting and l10n_it
2. Switch to IT company
3. Go to Vendors > Refunds
4. Try to import the xml from the ticket

### Cause of the issue:
The XML parser attempts to dynamically calculate the tax percentage using the formula tax_amount / (amount - tax_amount). When a line is purely a tax adjustment, the taxable base (amount - tax_amount) evaluates to exactly zero, triggering the critical division by zero crash.
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/e3b0ca11d99b2ef819cdad68b169112cd73668b6/addons/l10n_it_edi/models/account_move.py#L1863-L1867

### Reason to introduce the fix:
To ensure Odoo successfully imports valid, tax-only EDI documents already accepted by the Agenzia delle Entrate.

Ticket [link](https://www.odoo.com/odoo/project.task/6217373)
opw-6217373

Before this commit, a Stripe terminal payment could still be marked as `done` even if the capture step failed.

This happens when the card authorization succeeds, `processPayment` returns a payment intent, but the subsequent `stripe_capture_payment` RPC fails and `capturePaymentStripe()` returns `false`. The capture flow did not guard that return value and still fell through to `line.set_payment_status("done")`.

In practice, this can happen for example if the Odoo server cannot resolve `api.stripe.com` while capturing the payment intent. Stripe then keeps the payment in `requires_capture`, while the POS line is still synced as paid.

Guard the failed capture path and stop the flow before marking the line as done. In that case, the payment line is put back to `retry` so the failure is visible in the POS instead of silently creating a paid, uncaptured payment.

opw-6075384

---
I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr

Backport of: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/261521