Currently, an error occurs when the user receives a dropship order instead of delivering it directly to the customer. As a result, the sale order shows a negative delivered quantity.

## Steps to replicate:
- Install Sales, Inventory, and Purchase.
- Enable Dropshipping from Inventory settings.
- Create a test product with the Dropship route enabled and set a vendor for it in the Purchase tab.
- Create and confirm a quotation for a customer.
- Go to Purchase > `Deliver To:` and set it to `My Company: Receipts.`
- Confirm the Purchase Order and validate the receipt.
- Go back to the Sale Order.

## Observed Behavior:
The delivered quantity is -1, which is incorrect because the customer has not returned any products, nor has the user created a sale order line with a negative quantity (which would indicate a return).

## Root cause:
When computing the delivered quantity at [1], the function `_get_outgoing_incoming_moves` [2] is called to retrieve the incoming and outgoing stock moves associated with the sale order lines.

Inside this function, moves are filtered and categorized as incoming or outgoing. At [3], the condition is satisfied because the default value of `to_refund` is `True`, so the move is added to `incoming_move_ids`. Later, during the computation at [1], the code iterates through the incoming moves and subtracts their quantities from the delivered quantity.

Since the initial delivered quantity is 0, including such a move in `incoming_move_ids` causes the delivered quantity to become -1.


<h3> Why did this behavior not occur in lower versions?:</h3>

This issue was introduced by [commit], which added the functionality for users to return products that are not listed in the purchase order. As a result, their quantities appear as negative received quantities on the purchase order.

Before this change (in saas-18.2), the field `move.to_refund` had a default value of `False`. Because of this, the condition at [3] was not satisfied, and the move was not included in `incoming_move_ids`. Therefore, it was not subtracted when iterating through incoming moves, and the delivered quantity did not become negative.

Starting from 18.3, the default value of `to_refund` was changed to `True`. This causes the condition at [3] to be satisfied, the move to be included in `incoming_move_ids`, and its quantity to be subtracted during the computation, resulting in a delivered quantity of -1.

[1]-
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/1256875226436a854558a1334ffdc886fa4767a8/addons/sale_stock/models/sale_order_line.py#L193-L209 
[2]-
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/1256875226436a854558a1334ffdc886fa4767a8/addons/sale_stock/models/sale_order_line.py#L316-L353 
[3]-
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/1256875226436a854558a1334ffdc886fa4767a8/addons/sale_stock/models/sale_order_line.py#L346-L351

## Solution:
We can make the condition stricter by ensuring that only incoming moves that are actual returns are counted as negative in the quantity delivered on a sale order. 

Specifically, if an incoming move has no corresponding originating return move and the customer has not created a sale order line with a negative quantity (which could also indicate a return), it should not be considered when calculating the delivered quantity.

[commit]:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/209110/changes/c1c86182e4b28e929bf56e79f57f33aaa13e67f1

opw-5933594

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#267531
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#252383

### Steps to reproduce:

- create a table (e.g. /table)
- type something in any cell and select that cell.
- apply formatting through toolbar (bold, italic, etc.)
- now select that single cell through mouse.
- observe that it is not selected

### Description of the issue/feature this PR addresses:

- The single-cell selection logic relied on getTargetedNodes(), which collects descendants of the selection’s common ancestor. When selecting text inside inline formatting tag (e.g. `<i>`), the text node became the common ancestor, so the parent `<i>` tag was excluded from selectedNodes. As a result, check ensuring all cell elements were selected failed, preventing from being selected.

### Desired behavior after PR is merged:

- Cell selection was simplified using  areNodeContentsFullySelected(startTd) directly instead of manually matching targeted descendants. This relies on DOM Range to verify whether the cell boundaries are fully selected.

task-6207941

---
I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#266208
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#263742

Step to reproduce:
- install "pos_settle_due"
- create a pos order, set order price = 0, select a customer
- go to payment page, select "customer account" as payment method
- here you can set any amount to pay, ex 100$
- fulfill the  order.

Observation:
- the order amount is 0, if we pay 100$ using customer account, it is considered as change (which means we returned it to customer)
- As per PO, this flow doesn't make sense

Issue:
- customer has 100$ due for this order, but he won't be able to settle this as fetch order to settle with amount != 0, after commit [1] 
- [1] https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/commit/12af23d5382e972facfaa999e4c5ab30c97e8d1f

https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/951e5f42884c898bc14d9c32ae6a8f08c31ff06d/pos_settle_due/static/src/app/screens/partner_list/partner_line/partner_line.js#L35

Fix:
- we hide payment method of type "pay_later" in case of 0 price order

opw-6123699

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#118864
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#116556

**Steps to reproduce:**
* Install *Türkiye - Nilvera* (`l10n_tr_nilvera`) module.
* Log in as *admin user*.
* Create a *partner* for the company.
  * Set *country* as Turkey.
  * Configure required *taxes*.
* Create a *demo user*.
* Grant the demo user *Accounting admin access*.
* Log in with the *demo user*.
* Navigate to *Contacts* → open the *Turkey company partner*.
* Navigate to *Nilvera Status* (via Invoicing/Accounting tab) click on *Verify*.

**Observed behavior:**
* A *company access error* is raised during partner verification.

**Cause:**
* The field *l10n_tr_nilvera_api_key* is restricted with `groups='base.group_system'`, requiring full system admin rights.
* Users with *module-level admin access* (e.g., Accounting) do not have sufficient rights, causing the access error.

**Fix:**
* Use `sudo()` on `env.company` to bypass the restrictive group access.
* This allows users with appropriate *functional admin rights* to perform verification without granting full system privileges.

Ticket [link](https://www.odoo.com/odoo/project.task/6106907)
opw-6106907

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#267286
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#262668

Currently, an error occurs when the user receives a dropship order instead of delivering it directly to the customer. As a result, the sale order shows a negative delivered quantity.

## Steps to replicate:
- Install Sales, Inventory, and Purchase.
- Enable Dropshipping from Inventory settings.
- Create a test product with the Dropship route enabled and set a vendor for it in the Purchase tab.
- Create and confirm a quotation for a customer.
- Go to Purchase > `Deliver To:` and set it to `My Company: Receipts.`
- Confirm the Purchase Order and validate the receipt.
- Go back to the Sale Order.

## Observed Behavior:
The delivered quantity is -1, which is incorrect because the customer has not returned any products, nor has the user created a sale order line with a negative quantity (which would indicate a return).

## Root cause:
When computing the delivered quantity at [1], the function `_get_outgoing_incoming_moves` [2] is called to retrieve the incoming and outgoing stock moves associated with the sale order lines.

Inside this function, moves are filtered and categorized as incoming or outgoing. At [3], the condition is satisfied because the default value of `to_refund` is `True`, so the move is added to `incoming_move_ids`. Later, during the computation at [1], the code iterates through the incoming moves and subtracts their quantities from the delivered quantity.

Since the initial delivered quantity is 0, including such a move in `incoming_move_ids` causes the delivered quantity to become -1.


<h3> Why did this behavior not occur in lower versions?:</h3>

This issue was introduced by [commit], which added the functionality for users to return products that are not listed in the purchase order. As a result, their quantities appear as negative received quantities on the purchase order.

Before this change (in saas-18.2), the field `move.to_refund` had a default value of `False`. Because of this, the condition at [3] was not satisfied, and the move was not included in `incoming_move_ids`. Therefore, it was not subtracted when iterating through incoming moves, and the delivered quantity did not become negative.

Starting from 18.3, the default value of `to_refund` was changed to `True`. This causes the condition at [3] to be satisfied, the move to be included in `incoming_move_ids`, and its quantity to be subtracted during the computation, resulting in a delivered quantity of -1.

[1]-
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/1256875226436a854558a1334ffdc886fa4767a8/addons/sale_stock/models/sale_order_line.py#L193-L209 
[2]-
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/1256875226436a854558a1334ffdc886fa4767a8/addons/sale_stock/models/sale_order_line.py#L316-L353 
[3]-
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/1256875226436a854558a1334ffdc886fa4767a8/addons/sale_stock/models/sale_order_line.py#L346-L351

## Solution:
We can make the condition stricter by ensuring that only incoming moves that are actual returns are counted as negative in the quantity delivered on a sale order. 

Specifically, if an incoming move has no corresponding originating return move and the customer has not created a sale order line with a negative quantity (which could also indicate a return), it should not be considered when calculating the delivered quantity.

[commit]:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/209110/changes/c1c86182e4b28e929bf56e79f57f33aaa13e67f1

opw-5933594

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#267531
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#252383

### Steps to reproduce:

- create a table (e.g. /table)
- type something in any cell and select that cell.
- apply formatting through toolbar (bold, italic, etc.)
- now select that single cell through mouse.
- observe that it is not selected

### Description of the issue/feature this PR addresses:

- The single-cell selection logic relied on getTargetedNodes(), which collects descendants of the selection’s common ancestor. When selecting text inside inline formatting tag (e.g. `<i>`), the text node became the common ancestor, so the parent `<i>` tag was excluded from selectedNodes. As a result, check ensuring all cell elements were selected failed, preventing from being selected.

### Desired behavior after PR is merged:

- Cell selection was simplified using  areNodeContentsFullySelected(startTd) directly instead of manually matching targeted descendants. This relies on DOM Range to verify whether the cell boundaries are fully selected.

task-6207941

---
I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#266208
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#263742

**Steps to reproduce**
---
1. Configure a follow-up level with a WhatsApp template with required variables.
2. On a contact open Send and Print.
3. Uncheck WhatsApp (keep Email checked) and click Send.

**Issue**
---
The wizard raises "Missing required fields" even though the WhatsApp section is hidden.

The free-text inputs in the WhatsApp group of the manual reminder wizard are declared with `required="number_of_free_text >= N"` see https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/17231450e90cc7465370b5fe0a138b7f93dde91c/whatsapp_account_followup/wizard/followup_manual_reminder_views.xml#L23-L33 The surrounding group hides them with `invisible="not whatsapp"`, so as soon as a WhatsApp template is loaded on the wizard the fields are required regardless of the WhatsApp toggle.

This was masked until https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/commit/47369f696acd5c7e236e527deef890639017f2f1 removed the `_compute_free_text` prefill on `whatsapp.composer`: the free-text fields used to be auto-populated with each variable's demo value, so the required check was trivially satisfied. With the prefill gone the fields start empty and the latent constraint fires whenever WhatsApp is unchecked.

Ticket [link](https://www.odoo.com/odoo/project.task/6227911)
opw-6227911

**Steps to reproduce:**
- Install documents_account
- Set up alias to catch incoming mails
- Receive a mail with xml attachement which can be previewed as pdf
- Go to Documents app
- Click on the document preview
- Preview is split in two iframes, both with the same content (pdf)

**Issue:**
Due to the `isPdf` patch the attachment can match multiple types for the preview (pdf and text) as both getter return `true`.
```
<iframe t-if="state.file.isPdf" ...
<iframe t-if="state.file.isText" ...
```

It also seems that xml received by mail are imported as text, which is why the issue doesn't happen when manually uploading the same xml file.

**Fix:**
Ensure that if the document is matching `isPdf`, it doesn't trigger the second iframe with `isText`.

Also it seems fixed in 19.0 as the text iframe is replaced by this xpath: 
`<xpath expr="//iframe[@t-if='state.file.isText']" position="replace">`
which was added for https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/commit/de614ee5e9a087d49939c65c0118ae6164c7b31b

related patch: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/commit/ffcdd2275c8bf564e15151ccbcaf3965ed968450

opw-6018536

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#118041
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#112041

Steps to reproduce:
------------------------------------
1. Install `base_automation` and the Sales module
2. Create an automation rule for a sale order as follows: 
    * Trigger: State set to Sale order
    * Add a Create Activity action
    * Change User Type to Dynamic
    * Set User Field to Customer > Users
3. Create and confirm a sale order with Admin as the customer

Observation:
------------------------------------
The activity is created in Chatter, but it was not assigned to any user

Issue:
------------------------------------
The condition `self.activity_user_field_name in record` uses the `__contains__` check which only looks for direct fields on the record's model. A dotted path like 'partner_id.user_id' is not a field name on the record itself, so the check evaluated to `False`, skipping the user assignment entirely https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/2bafcebfaba01e46856d6eb2a440ede95b9c0a4a/addons/mail/models/ir_actions_server.py#L378-L379

Solution:
------------------------------------
Use `record.mapped()` as a fallback when the field name is not directly present on the record. `mapped()` natively supports dotted paths by traversing the relational chain (e.g. record -> partner_id -> user_id)

opw-6191715
Related Enterprise PR: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/pull/118921

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#263530

Problem:
When the selection is inside a `contenteditable="true"` element that is not the root editable, focusing away does not trigger a save.

Cause:
When the DOM contains a nested contenteditable structure like:

```html
<div class="odoo-editor-editable" contenteditable="true">
  abc
  <div contenteditable="false">
    ac
    <div contenteditable="true">a</div>
  </div>
</div>
```

With the selection inside the inner `contenteditable="true"`, the `blur` event is not triggered on `.odoo-editor-editable` when focusing away, because the active element is the inner div and `blur` does not bubble.

Solution:
Replace the `blur` listener with `focusout`, which bubbles from the inner `contenteditable="true"` up to `.odoo-editor-editable`, allowing `onBlur` to be called correctly.

Steps to reproduce:
- Open Project > Task.
- Add a `/column` block in the description.
- Focus inside any column and write some text.
- Click away to change tab.
- Reopen the description tab.
- The latest changes inside the columns were not saved.

opw-6227922

---
I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#266367

__

## Short functional explanation of the error
When confirming a Purchase Order holding lines with an analytic distribution that has been manually added, and creating a vendor bill out of this PO using the Auto-Complete field. When we change the account of that line, the line loses the manually added Analytic Distribution.

## Reproduction Steps
1. Go to Accounting. Click on the tab Configuration; under the Analytic Accounting section, click on Analytic Distribution Models.
2. Create an Analytic Distribution Model for a product.
3. Go to Purchase. Create a new PO, set a Vendor and select the product you created the Analytic Distribution Model for. On the right side of the form, click on the view menu and check Analytic Distribution to make it appear.
4. Click on the Analytic Distribution of the product and add a new one; for example, select Administrative in the Departments section.
5. Confirm order.
6. Go to Accounting and click on the Vendors tab > Bills. Create a new bill, and in the field Auto-Complete, select the PO you just created.
7. Change the account of the line.

### Expected behavior
Only the account should be changed on the line.

### Unexpected behavior
The manually added Analytic Distribution has disappeared.

## Origin of the issue
When we change the `account_id` field, the compute method `_compute_analytic_distribution` is triggered. This method retrieves the related distributions of the line:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/af32885ec5f07d492f3b8e8fff1785996a739f72/addons/account/models/account_move_line.py#L1154 which, in the context of Purchase, calls this method: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/af32885ec5f07d492f3b8e8fff1785996a739f72/addons/purchase/models/account_invoice.py#L540-L545 We retrieve the distribution of the related line using `self.purchase_line_id.analytic_distribution`. However, this code isn't triggered when the move line has an analytic distribution, even though the related line `purchase_line_id` might have one! Therefore, we need to execute that code whether or not our move line has an analytic distribution.
Note: the same behavior is to avoid when creating invoices for
quotations.
__
opw-6062466

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#267274
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#258380

Steps to reproduce
1. Create a company with Egypt localization, currency EGP
2. On a bank journal, set Outstanding Receipt and Outstanding Payment accounts
3. Register a customer payment so the journal dashboard shows the Payments row with a negative amount
4. Switch the user language to Arabic
5. Open the Accounting dashboard

Issue
The Payments amount renders as "LE 5,000.00-" instead of "-5,000.00 LE". formatCurrency returns the string "-5,000.00 LE". In an Arabic page the leading "-" has no intrinsic direction, so the browser attaches it to the surrounding right-to-left Arabic text and visually moves it past the symbol. Sibling rows on the same dashboard render correctly because they already wrap the amount in dir="ltr", see
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/d0424f2ffcf99ee59befe288150f1643b3fa0112/addons/account/views/account_journal_dashboard_view.xml#L252

opw-6183749
---
I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#267582
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#266742

Issue
-----
Traceback when trying to get a rate through the e-commerce if the order has to be split into multiple packages due to weight being too high.

Steps to reproduce
-----
- Setup Sendcloud delivery method
	- make it available in e-commerce
- Create a 150kg product and publish it
- Go to e-commerce
	- Add the product to cart
	- Checkout the cart

> Traceback

Cause
-----
We retrieve the order's weight through the context.

https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/d9a9339e1f30f1e5cc37ebb88949451a6652f83b/delivery_sendcloud/models/delivery_carrier.py#L108

If the call to `_get_shipping_rate` returns that the delivery requires multiple packages, we go into

https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/d9a9339e1f30f1e5cc37ebb88949451a6652f83b/delivery_sendcloud/models/delivery_carrier.py#L126-L128

If `order_weight` was not present in the context, this will cause an error in `sendcloud_convert_weight` since it expects a numerical value but receives the `None` fallback. This context key is only present when going through `choose.delivery.carrier` (so not in the e-commerce flow).

https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/058e640e6687ed3f709dc846f0fa7a1f45226849/addons/delivery/wizard/choose_delivery_carrier.py#L69

-----
Ticket:
opw-6210398

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#119048
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#117028

When a user installs only the Invoicing app and creates a new purchase journal, no default_account_id is set on the journal. The Invoicing app does not expose account configuration, so the user cannot fix this manually. As a result, importing a Peppol XML invoice through that journal fails with a database constraint error because the generated account.move.line has a null account_id.

https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/16245530f0e3e9be21c8b96baaecd3a679420cac/addons/account/models/account_journal.py#L776-L805 This already auto-creates accounts for bank/cash journals, but does nothing for sale/purchase journals.

Steps to reproduce:
- Install the Invoicing app (no full Accounting)
- Create a new purchase journal with type 'purchase'
- Go to Vendors -> Bills and Upload a Peppol XML file
- Error importing attachment as invoice (decoder=_import_invoice_ubl_cii)

Ticket [link](https://www.odoo.com/odoo/action-4043/6014363)
opw-6014363

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#267552
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#252859

Several error are logged in the chatter when signing a payslip that includes an IMSS disability time off.

Steps to reproduce:
* Install l10n_mx_hr_payroll_account modules
* Switch to "INNOVACION VALOR Y DESARROLLO SA SA" company
* Go to Employees and open Cesar Osbaldo Cruz Solorzano
* Click on "Time Off" smart button and create a new time off with "Disability due to illness (IMSS)" type for "02/01/2026"(Any date).
* Go to Payroll > Payslips > Payslips and create a new pay run
* Select Salary Structure 'Mexico: Regular Pay', Pay Schedule 'Monthly' and the Period '01/01/2026 -> 01/31/2026'
* Click on Continue, select Cesar and click on Select
* Open the payslip, click on "Validate" and "Ok"
* Mark as paid, open the "Journal Entry" from the smart button and click on "Post".
* Back to the payslip, and click on "Generate CFDI" button.
* An error is added to the chatter.

### Missing node to declare disabilities
Original message
```py
An error occurred while signing the CFDI document with the government:
Code : NOM111 Message : Error no clasificado. Extra Info : El nodo
"Incapacidades" se debera informar si se incluye en percepciones la
clave 014 "Subsidios por Incapacidad" o bien en deducciones la clave 006
"Descuento por incapacidad".
```

Translated message
```py
An error occurred while signing the CFDI document with the government:
Code: NOM111 Message: Unclassified error. Extra Info: The "Incapacidades"
(Disabilities) node must be reported if the perception key 014
"Subsidios por Incapacidad" (Disability Subsidies) is included, or if
the deduction key 006 "Descuento por incapacidad" (Disability Deduction)
is included.
```

Legal Context:
According to Mexican law, IMSS disabilities must be declared in a specific XML node.

There are two primary scenarios for reporting these amounts:
* Deduction (Type 006): The employer does not pay for these days, as the IMSS is responsible for the payment to the employee.
  This is the most common scenario.

* Perception (Type 014): The employer pays for these days as a superior benefit. For example, by law, the IMSS does not pay for the first 3 days of a disability due to illness, and employers are not obligated to cover them either. However, companies offering superior benefits may choose to pay these days as a "Disability Subsidy."

Solution:
The chosen approach is to configure the Deduction node.
For the `l10n_mx_regular_pay_imss_disabilities` rule, the `l10n_mx_concept` has been set to `l10n_mx_concept_d6` (D06 - Disability Deduction). This ensures the required node is added.

### Missing "ImporteMonetario" attribute
Original message
```
An error occurred while signing the CFDI document with the government:
Code : NOM95 Message : El atributo Deduccion:Importe no es igual a la
suma de los nodos Incapacidad:ImporteMonetario, ya que la clave
expresada en Nomina.Deducciones.Deduccion.TipoDeduccion es "006".
```

Translated message
```
An error occurred while signing the CFDI document with the government:
Code: NOM95 Message: The attribute "Deduccion:Importe" does not match
the sum of the "Incapacidad:ImporteMonetario" nodes, as the key
expressed in "Nomina.Deducciones.Deduccion.TipoDeduccion" is "006".
```

Problem:
The "Incapacidades" node requires the "ImporteMonetario" attribute, which should represent the sum of the monetary value associated with the disabilities.

Solution:
Add the "ImporteMonetario" attribute and calculate its value using `l10n_mx_daily_salary`.

### Invalid "DiasIncapacidad" format
```py
An error occurred while signing the CFDI document with the government:
Code : 301 Message : XML mal formado Extra Info : Element
'{[http://www.sat.gob.mx/nomina12}Incapacidad](http://www.sat.gob.mx/nomina12%7DIncapacidad)', attribute
'DiasIncapacidad': '4.0' is not a valid value of the local atomic type.
```

Problem:
Altough the defaultdict where the values are sum up, `number_of_days` is
a float field, and when we get back the value, it is a float, adding for
example 4.0 instead of 4, which is not a valid value.

Solution:
Cast the value to int.

### Duplicate deduction on disabilities
```py
Wrong python code defined for:
- Employee: Cesar Osbaldo Cruz Solorzano
- Version: False
- Payslip: Salary Slip - Cesar Osbaldo Cruz Solorzano - 05/01/2026 - 05/15/2026
- Salary rule: ISR (Income Tax) (ISR)
- Error: TypeError('cannot unpack non-iterable NoneType object') while
evaluating
"
def find_rates(x, rates):
    for low, high, fix, rate in rates:
        if low <= x <= high:
            return low, high, fix, rate

gross = categories['GROSS']
result = 0
if gross:
    isr_table = payslip._rule_parameter('l10n_mx_isr_tables')[version.schedule_pay]
    low, high, fix, rate = find_rates(gross, isr_table)
    result = -((gross - low) * rate + fix)

period_factor = payslip._rule_parameter('l10n_mx_schedule_table')[version.schedule_pay]
if period_factor >= 15:
    period_factor = (period_factor / 30) * (365 / 12)
min_wage = payslip._rule_parameter('l10n_mx_daily_min_wage') * period_factor

if gross <= min_wage:
    result_qty = 0.0
"
```

Problem:
The IMSS disability amount is being deducted twice:
1. During "Worked Days" calculation, the IMSS disability is already not considered because the work entries belong to the "Unpaid Work Entry Types" of "Mexico: Regular Pay" structure.
2. During "Salary Computation", the `IMSS_DISABLE` salary rule deducts another time because it is in the `TAXABLE_ALW` category, and this one is deducted in the `NET` rule.

When the disability covers more than half of the period (e.g., 20 days in a monthly schedule), the double deduction causes the NET to become negative. This prevents the ISR rule from finding a correct stage in the tax tables, leading to a traceback.

Example: For a monthly wage of 30,000.0 and 5 disability days:
- The total amount in "Worked Days" is 25,000.0 (disabilities already deducted).
- The IMSS_DISABLE rule calculates -5,000.0, and when the NET rule is calculated, the disabilities are deducted again. Total NET becomes 16,843.84 instead of the expected 20,834.85.

Solution:
Change the rule category to `INTERMEDIARY_COMPUTATION` and avoid the double deduction when the `NET` is calculated, as it is already considered in the "Worked Days".

### Incorrect values in the XML
The signing process completes without errors, but some amounts in the generated XML are incorrect.

Problem:
The introduction of the Deduction 006 (Disability) directly impacts the calculation of the SubTotal and Total attributes in the Comprobante node.
For a monthly payslip with a wage of 30,000.00 (daily salary of 1,000.00) and 5 disability days (work risk), the values are calculated incorrectly as follows:
Attribute            | Calculation                      | Actual Value | Correct Value
---------------------|----------------------------------|--------------|--------------
Comprobante:SubTotal | Sum of Perceptions (P01)         | 25000.00     | 30000.00 (1)
Comprobante:Total    | SubTotal - Total Deductions (2)  | 15803.74     | 20803.74

(1) Must include the 5,000.00 from disabilities to balance the deduction.
(2) Total Deductions = D06 (5,000.00) + ISR (3,451.65) + IMSS (744.61) = 9,196.26.

The Total is currently undercalculated because the 5,000.00 is being
deducted from the SubTotal that already had those 5,000.00 excluded.

Solution:
Since the `SubTotal` is derived from Perceptions, and the "(P01)
Salaries, Wages, Stripes, and Day Labor" amount is driven by the
`GROSS_WITHOUT_HOLIDAY` rule, the disability amount must be added. This
balances the Deduction 006, ensuring `SubTotal` is correct.

### Absenteeism and Disabilities
By law, the calculation of IMSS contributions depends on these two types of unpaid days:
* Disabilities: Refers to medical leave issued by the Institute (IMSS).
* Absenteeism: Refers to unjustified leave; apply for periods of fewer than 8 days.

Source: [Artículo 31](https://www.imss.gob.mx/sites/all/statics/pdf/leyes/LSS.pdf)
Translated text:
Article 31. When wages are not paid due to the employee's absence from work, but the employment relationship persists, the monthly contribution shall be adjusted according to the following rules:

I. If the employee's absences are for periods of fewer than eight consecutive or non-consecutive days, contributions shall be calculated and paid for such periods only for the sickness and maternity insurance...
If the employee's absences are for periods of eight consecutive days or more, the employer shall be released from the payment of employer-employee contributions...

IV. In the case of absences covered by medical disabilities issued by the Institute, it shall not be mandatory to cover the employer-employee contributions, except regarding the retirement branch.

The following table summarizes the contribution requirements based on the type of absence:
Insurance Branch (RAMA)         | Section I (Absenteeism) | Section IV (Disability)
--------------------------------|-------------------------|------------------------
Sickness and Maternity          | Paid                    | Not Paid
Disability and Life             | Not Paid                | Not Paid
Severance and Old Age           | Not Paid                | Not Paid
Work Risk                       | Not Paid                | Not Paid
Daycare and Social Benefits     | Not Paid                | Not Paid
INFONAVIT                       | Not Paid                | Paid
Retirement                      | Not Paid                | Paid

The type of unpaid day to be considered depends on the specific insurance branch being calculated within the employer-employee contributions.

### Add test for cfdi with disabilities.

target: 19.0
task-6066160

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#116819

Currently, an error occurs when the user receives a dropship order instead of delivering it directly to the customer. As a result, the sale order shows a negative delivered quantity.

## Steps to replicate:
- Install Sales, Inventory, and Purchase.
- Enable Dropshipping from Inventory settings.
- Create a test product with the Dropship route enabled and set a vendor for it in the Purchase tab.
- Create and confirm a quotation for a customer.
- Go to Purchase > `Deliver To:` and set it to `My Company: Receipts.`
- Confirm the Purchase Order and validate the receipt.
- Go back to the Sale Order.

## Observed Behavior:
The delivered quantity is -1, which is incorrect because the customer has not returned any products, nor has the user created a sale order line with a negative quantity (which would indicate a return).

## Root cause:
When computing the delivered quantity at [1], the function `_get_outgoing_incoming_moves` [2] is called to retrieve the incoming and outgoing stock moves associated with the sale order lines.

Inside this function, moves are filtered and categorized as incoming or outgoing. At [3], the condition is satisfied because the default value of `to_refund` is `True`, so the move is added to `incoming_move_ids`. Later, during the computation at [1], the code iterates through the incoming moves and subtracts their quantities from the delivered quantity.

Since the initial delivered quantity is 0, including such a move in `incoming_move_ids` causes the delivered quantity to become -1.


<h3> Why did this behavior not occur in lower versions?:</h3>

This issue was introduced by [commit], which added the functionality for users to return products that are not listed in the purchase order. As a result, their quantities appear as negative received quantities on the purchase order.

Before this change (in saas-18.2), the field `move.to_refund` had a default value of `False`. Because of this, the condition at [3] was not satisfied, and the move was not included in `incoming_move_ids`. Therefore, it was not subtracted when iterating through incoming moves, and the delivered quantity did not become negative.

Starting from 18.3, the default value of `to_refund` was changed to `True`. This causes the condition at [3] to be satisfied, the move to be included in `incoming_move_ids`, and its quantity to be subtracted during the computation, resulting in a delivered quantity of -1.

[1]-
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/1256875226436a854558a1334ffdc886fa4767a8/addons/sale_stock/models/sale_order_line.py#L193-L209 
[2]-
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/1256875226436a854558a1334ffdc886fa4767a8/addons/sale_stock/models/sale_order_line.py#L316-L353 
[3]-
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/1256875226436a854558a1334ffdc886fa4767a8/addons/sale_stock/models/sale_order_line.py#L346-L351

## Solution:
We can make the condition stricter by ensuring that only incoming moves that are actual returns are counted as negative in the quantity delivered on a sale order. 

Specifically, if an incoming move has no corresponding originating return move and the customer has not created a sale order line with a negative quantity (which could also indicate a return), it should not be considered when calculating the delivered quantity.

[commit]:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/209110/changes/c1c86182e4b28e929bf56e79f57f33aaa13e67f1

opw-5933594

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#267531
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#252383

### Steps to reproduce:

- create a table (e.g. /table)
- type something in any cell and select that cell.
- apply formatting through toolbar (bold, italic, etc.)
- now select that single cell through mouse.
- observe that it is not selected

### Description of the issue/feature this PR addresses:

- The single-cell selection logic relied on getTargetedNodes(), which collects descendants of the selection’s common ancestor. When selecting text inside inline formatting tag (e.g. `<i>`), the text node became the common ancestor, so the parent `<i>` tag was excluded from selectedNodes. As a result, check ensuring all cell elements were selected failed, preventing from being selected.

### Desired behavior after PR is merged:

- Cell selection was simplified using  areNodeContentsFullySelected(startTd) directly instead of manually matching targeted descendants. This relies on DOM Range to verify whether the cell boundaries are fully selected.

task-6207941

---
I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#266208
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#263742

Steps to reproduce:
------------------------------------
1. Install `base_automation` and the Sales module
2. Create an automation rule for a sale order as follows: 
    * Trigger: State set to Sale order
    * Add a Create Activity action
    * Change User Type to Dynamic
    * Set User Field to Customer > Users
3. Create and confirm a sale order with Admin as the customer

Observation:
------------------------------------
The activity is created in Chatter, but it was not assigned to any user

Issue:
------------------------------------
The condition `self.activity_user_field_name in record` uses the `__contains__` check which only looks for direct fields on the record's model. A dotted path like 'partner_id.user_id' is not a field name on the record itself, so the check evaluated to `False`, skipping the user assignment entirely https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/2bafcebfaba01e46856d6eb2a440ede95b9c0a4a/addons/mail/models/ir_actions_server.py#L378-L379

Solution:
------------------------------------
Use `record.mapped()` as a fallback when the field name is not directly present on the record. `mapped()` natively supports dotted paths by traversing the relational chain (e.g. record -> partner_id -> user_id)

opw-6191715
Related Enterprise PR: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/pull/118921

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#263530

Steps to reproduce:
------------------------------------
1. Install `ai` and `contacts` modules
2. Create an automation rule on Contact model:
    * Trigger: On Creation
    * Action To Do: Execute AI Action
    * Add a server action tool with 'Create Next Activity' action
    * Set Activity User Type to Dynamic
    * Set User Field to a dotted path (e.g., user_ids or partner_id.user_id)
3. Create a contact with a linked user

Observation:
------------------------------------
The activity description in the toast message fails to retrieve the user when using dotted field paths

Issue:
------------------------------------
The direct field access `record[self.activity_user_field_name]` in `_ai_get_action_description` method doesn't support dotted paths like 'partner_id.user_id'. This causes the same issue as in the mail module where relational field chains cannot be traversed

Solution:
------------------------------------
Use `record.mapped()` to support dotted paths by traversing the relational chain, consistent with the fix applied to the mail module

opw-6191715
Related Community PR: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/263530

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#118921

Steps to reproduce
1. Create a company with Egypt localization, currency EGP
2. On a bank journal, set Outstanding Receipt and Outstanding Payment accounts
3. Register a customer payment so the journal dashboard shows the Payments row with a negative amount
4. Switch the user language to Arabic
5. Open the Accounting dashboard

Issue
The Payments amount renders as "LE 5,000.00-" instead of "-5,000.00 LE". formatCurrency returns the string "-5,000.00 LE". In an Arabic page the leading "-" has no intrinsic direction, so the browser attaches it to the surrounding right-to-left Arabic text and visually moves it past the symbol. Sibling rows on the same dashboard render correctly because they already wrap the amount in dir="ltr", see
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/d0424f2ffcf99ee59befe288150f1643b3fa0112/addons/account/views/account_journal_dashboard_view.xml#L252

opw-6183749
---
I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#267582
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#266742

Several error are logged in the chatter when signing a payslip that includes an IMSS disability time off.

Steps to reproduce:
* Install l10n_mx_hr_payroll_account modules
* Switch to "INNOVACION VALOR Y DESARROLLO SA SA" company
* Go to Employees and open Cesar Osbaldo Cruz Solorzano
* Click on "Time Off" smart button and create a new time off with "Disability due to illness (IMSS)" type for "02/01/2026"(Any date).
* Go to Payroll > Payslips > Payslips and create a new pay run
* Select Salary Structure 'Mexico: Regular Pay', Pay Schedule 'Monthly' and the Period '01/01/2026 -> 01/31/2026'
* Click on Continue, select Cesar and click on Select
* Open the payslip, click on "Validate" and "Ok"
* Mark as paid, open the "Journal Entry" from the smart button and click on "Post".
* Back to the payslip, and click on "Generate CFDI" button.
* An error is added to the chatter.

### Missing node to declare disabilities
Original message
```py
An error occurred while signing the CFDI document with the government:
Code : NOM111 Message : Error no clasificado. Extra Info : El nodo
"Incapacidades" se debera informar si se incluye en percepciones la
clave 014 "Subsidios por Incapacidad" o bien en deducciones la clave 006
"Descuento por incapacidad".
```

Translated message
```py
An error occurred while signing the CFDI document with the government:
Code: NOM111 Message: Unclassified error. Extra Info: The "Incapacidades"
(Disabilities) node must be reported if the perception key 014
"Subsidios por Incapacidad" (Disability Subsidies) is included, or if
the deduction key 006 "Descuento por incapacidad" (Disability Deduction)
is included.
```

Legal Context:
According to Mexican law, IMSS disabilities must be declared in a specific XML node.

There are two primary scenarios for reporting these amounts:
* Deduction (Type 006): The employer does not pay for these days, as the IMSS is responsible for the payment to the employee.
  This is the most common scenario.

* Perception (Type 014): The employer pays for these days as a superior benefit. For example, by law, the IMSS does not pay for the first 3 days of a disability due to illness, and employers are not obligated to cover them either. However, companies offering superior benefits may choose to pay these days as a "Disability Subsidy."

Solution:
The chosen approach is to configure the Deduction node.
For the `l10n_mx_regular_pay_imss_disabilities` rule, the `l10n_mx_concept` has been set to `l10n_mx_concept_d6` (D06 - Disability Deduction). This ensures the required node is added.

### Missing "ImporteMonetario" attribute
Original message
```
An error occurred while signing the CFDI document with the government:
Code : NOM95 Message : El atributo Deduccion:Importe no es igual a la
suma de los nodos Incapacidad:ImporteMonetario, ya que la clave
expresada en Nomina.Deducciones.Deduccion.TipoDeduccion es "006".
```

Translated message
```
An error occurred while signing the CFDI document with the government:
Code: NOM95 Message: The attribute "Deduccion:Importe" does not match
the sum of the "Incapacidad:ImporteMonetario" nodes, as the key
expressed in "Nomina.Deducciones.Deduccion.TipoDeduccion" is "006".
```

Problem:
The "Incapacidades" node requires the "ImporteMonetario" attribute, which should represent the sum of the monetary value associated with the disabilities.

Solution:
Add the "ImporteMonetario" attribute and calculate its value using `l10n_mx_daily_salary`.

### Invalid "DiasIncapacidad" format
```py
An error occurred while signing the CFDI document with the government:
Code : 301 Message : XML mal formado Extra Info : Element
'{[http://www.sat.gob.mx/nomina12}Incapacidad](http://www.sat.gob.mx/nomina12%7DIncapacidad)', attribute
'DiasIncapacidad': '4.0' is not a valid value of the local atomic type.
```

Problem:
Altough the defaultdict where the values are sum up, `number_of_days` is
a float field, and when we get back the value, it is a float, adding for
example 4.0 instead of 4, which is not a valid value.

Solution:
Cast the value to int.

### Duplicate deduction on disabilities
```py
Wrong python code defined for:
- Employee: Cesar Osbaldo Cruz Solorzano
- Version: False
- Payslip: Salary Slip - Cesar Osbaldo Cruz Solorzano - 05/01/2026 - 05/15/2026
- Salary rule: ISR (Income Tax) (ISR)
- Error: TypeError('cannot unpack non-iterable NoneType object') while
evaluating
"
def find_rates(x, rates):
    for low, high, fix, rate in rates:
        if low <= x <= high:
            return low, high, fix, rate

gross = categories['GROSS']
result = 0
if gross:
    isr_table = payslip._rule_parameter('l10n_mx_isr_tables')[version.schedule_pay]
    low, high, fix, rate = find_rates(gross, isr_table)
    result = -((gross - low) * rate + fix)

period_factor = payslip._rule_parameter('l10n_mx_schedule_table')[version.schedule_pay]
if period_factor >= 15:
    period_factor = (period_factor / 30) * (365 / 12)
min_wage = payslip._rule_parameter('l10n_mx_daily_min_wage') * period_factor

if gross <= min_wage:
    result_qty = 0.0
"
```

Problem:
The IMSS disability amount is being deducted twice:
1. During "Worked Days" calculation, the IMSS disability is already not considered because the work entries belong to the "Unpaid Work Entry Types" of "Mexico: Regular Pay" structure.
2. During "Salary Computation", the `IMSS_DISABLE` salary rule deducts another time because it is in the `TAXABLE_ALW` category, and this one is deducted in the `NET` rule.

When the disability covers more than half of the period (e.g., 20 days in a monthly schedule), the double deduction causes the NET to become negative. This prevents the ISR rule from finding a correct stage in the tax tables, leading to a traceback.

Example: For a monthly wage of 30,000.0 and 5 disability days:
- The total amount in "Worked Days" is 25,000.0 (disabilities already deducted).
- The IMSS_DISABLE rule calculates -5,000.0, and when the NET rule is calculated, the disabilities are deducted again. Total NET becomes 16,843.84 instead of the expected 20,834.85.

Solution:
Change the rule category to `INTERMEDIARY_COMPUTATION` and avoid the double deduction when the `NET` is calculated, as it is already considered in the "Worked Days".

### Incorrect values in the XML
The signing process completes without errors, but some amounts in the generated XML are incorrect.

Problem:
The introduction of the Deduction 006 (Disability) directly impacts the calculation of the SubTotal and Total attributes in the Comprobante node.
For a monthly payslip with a wage of 30,000.00 (daily salary of 1,000.00) and 5 disability days (work risk), the values are calculated incorrectly as follows:
Attribute            | Calculation                      | Actual Value | Correct Value
---------------------|----------------------------------|--------------|--------------
Comprobante:SubTotal | Sum of Perceptions (P01)         | 25000.00     | 30000.00 (1)
Comprobante:Total    | SubTotal - Total Deductions (2)  | 15803.74     | 20803.74

(1) Must include the 5,000.00 from disabilities to balance the deduction.
(2) Total Deductions = D06 (5,000.00) + ISR (3,451.65) + IMSS (744.61) = 9,196.26.

The Total is currently undercalculated because the 5,000.00 is being
deducted from the SubTotal that already had those 5,000.00 excluded.

Solution:
Since the `SubTotal` is derived from Perceptions, and the "(P01)
Salaries, Wages, Stripes, and Day Labor" amount is driven by the
`GROSS_WITHOUT_HOLIDAY` rule, the disability amount must be added. This
balances the Deduction 006, ensuring `SubTotal` is correct.

### Absenteeism and Disabilities
By law, the calculation of IMSS contributions depends on these two types of unpaid days:
* Disabilities: Refers to medical leave issued by the Institute (IMSS).
* Absenteeism: Refers to unjustified leave; apply for periods of fewer than 8 days.

Source: [Artículo 31](https://www.imss.gob.mx/sites/all/statics/pdf/leyes/LSS.pdf)
Translated text:
Article 31. When wages are not paid due to the employee's absence from work, but the employment relationship persists, the monthly contribution shall be adjusted according to the following rules:

I. If the employee's absences are for periods of fewer than eight consecutive or non-consecutive days, contributions shall be calculated and paid for such periods only for the sickness and maternity insurance...
If the employee's absences are for periods of eight consecutive days or more, the employer shall be released from the payment of employer-employee contributions...

IV. In the case of absences covered by medical disabilities issued by the Institute, it shall not be mandatory to cover the employer-employee contributions, except regarding the retirement branch.

The following table summarizes the contribution requirements based on the type of absence:
Insurance Branch (RAMA)         | Section I (Absenteeism) | Section IV (Disability)
--------------------------------|-------------------------|------------------------
Sickness and Maternity          | Paid                    | Not Paid
Disability and Life             | Not Paid                | Not Paid
Severance and Old Age           | Not Paid                | Not Paid
Work Risk                       | Not Paid                | Not Paid
Daycare and Social Benefits     | Not Paid                | Not Paid
INFONAVIT                       | Not Paid                | Paid
Retirement                      | Not Paid                | Paid

The type of unpaid day to be considered depends on the specific insurance branch being calculated within the employer-employee contributions.

### Add test for cfdi with disabilities.

target: 19.0
task-6066160

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#116819

Problem
------------------
When creating group allocations, when the allocation type is accrual and the start date is set in the past, the newly created allocations have the accrual amounts at 0. To reproduce:
1. Create an accrual plan with an easily measurable milestone (e.g. 1 day every day)
2. From the allocations view -> New Group Allocation
3. Enter the following values: Grant -> By Employee Employees -> select your employee Time Off Type -> Paid Time Off (doesn't matter too much) Allocation Type -> Based on Accrual Plan Validity Period -> any date a few days in the past (Personally I tested with 1/1/2025 and no end date) Allocation -> Keep at 0 Allocate Time Off
4. Go to the newly created allocation The allocation amount is 0.

Reason
----------------------
When creating group allocations, the `hr.leave.allocation.generate.multi.wizard` calls the `_process_accrual_plans()` method to compute the accruals, but when the allocations are created, the nextcall and lastcall fields are set, so the accruals are not computed and the scheduled action also does nothing until the nextcall date. The onchange method manually sets the nextcall date to False so the accruals are processed.

Solution
------------------
Created a method to get the fields that need to be set to calculate the initial accrual amounts from the start date, which is called both in the onchange and to batch write in the wizard before accrual plans are processed. The wizard checks the duration values before overwriting the number_of_days field, since user manually setting the amount should overwrite the calculations.

task-4938695

Description of the issue/feature this PR addresses:

Current behavior before PR:

Desired behavior after PR is merged:




---
I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#267305
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#265783

Problem:
When the selection is inside a `contenteditable="true"` element that is not the root editable, focusing away does not trigger a save.

Cause:
When the DOM contains a nested contenteditable structure like:

```html
<div class="odoo-editor-editable" contenteditable="true">
  abc
  <div contenteditable="false">
    ac
    <div contenteditable="true">a</div>
  </div>
</div>
```

With the selection inside the inner `contenteditable="true"`, the `blur` event is not triggered on `.odoo-editor-editable` when focusing away, because the active element is the inner div and `blur` does not bubble.

Solution:
Replace the `blur` listener with `focusout`, which bubbles from the inner `contenteditable="true"` up to `.odoo-editor-editable`, allowing `onBlur` to be called correctly.

Steps to reproduce:
- Open Project > Task.
- Add a `/column` block in the description.
- Focus inside any column and write some text.
- Click away to change tab.
- Reopen the description tab.
- The latest changes inside the columns were not saved.

opw-6227922

---
I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#266367

__

## Short functional explanation of the error
When confirming a Purchase Order holding lines with an analytic distribution that has been manually added, and creating a vendor bill out of this PO using the Auto-Complete field. When we change the account of that line, the line loses the manually added Analytic Distribution.

## Reproduction Steps
1. Go to Accounting. Click on the tab Configuration; under the Analytic Accounting section, click on Analytic Distribution Models.
2. Create an Analytic Distribution Model for a product.
3. Go to Purchase. Create a new PO, set a Vendor and select the product you created the Analytic Distribution Model for. On the right side of the form, click on the view menu and check Analytic Distribution to make it appear.
4. Click on the Analytic Distribution of the product and add a new one; for example, select Administrative in the Departments section.
5. Confirm order.
6. Go to Accounting and click on the Vendors tab > Bills. Create a new bill, and in the field Auto-Complete, select the PO you just created.
7. Change the account of the line.

### Expected behavior
Only the account should be changed on the line.

### Unexpected behavior
The manually added Analytic Distribution has disappeared.

## Origin of the issue
When we change the `account_id` field, the compute method `_compute_analytic_distribution` is triggered. This method retrieves the related distributions of the line:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/af32885ec5f07d492f3b8e8fff1785996a739f72/addons/account/models/account_move_line.py#L1154 which, in the context of Purchase, calls this method: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/af32885ec5f07d492f3b8e8fff1785996a739f72/addons/purchase/models/account_invoice.py#L540-L545 We retrieve the distribution of the related line using `self.purchase_line_id.analytic_distribution`. However, this code isn't triggered when the move line has an analytic distribution, even though the related line `purchase_line_id` might have one! Therefore, we need to execute that code whether or not our move line has an analytic distribution.
Note: the same behavior is to avoid when creating invoices for
quotations.
__
opw-6062466

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#267274
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#258380

Steps to reproduce:
- Activate Anglo-Saxon accounting
- Create a product with track inventory and an automated inventory valuation product category
- Define MTO on the product
- Add this product to an Analytic Distribution Model (i.e. Legal)

- Create a SO for this product
- Create and confirm the PO related to it, the Analytic account is set on the PO.
- Confirm the reception of the product
- This creates a Stock valuation layer with the Analytic account
- Confirm the SO
- Confirm the delivery of the product
- This creates a Stock valuation layer with the Analytic account too
- Create the Invoice

Issue:
Missing analytic account on the 110300 Stock Interim (Delivered) creating unabalanced analytic accounting

Other:
test_report_invoice_items_anglo_saxon_automatic_valuation
introduced in this PR https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/205777
checks that in a project's analytic report, the values based
on cogs lines are displayed in the cost section.
With this fix, both cogs lines will have an analytic account
so their impact on the project analytic report will even out.
This made the test fail.
To keep the benefit of this test, we simulate that the user manually
removes the analytic account on some of the cogs lines
(those targetting stock interim received).


opw-6060567

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#266617
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#261798

Issue:
Sending payments to SAT before its full amount is reconciled allow sending the same invoice payment several times to CFDI.

Steps to reproduce:
- In a Mexican company
- Create an invoice A of $40 to Inmobiliaria CVA
- Confirm and send to CFDI
- Go to bank, create a new Bank transaction of $80
- reconcile with Invoice A
- Go to invoice A => click on button "Update payments" (it doesn't appear in previous versions)
- Then sheet CFDI and Download There is the first XML sent to CFDI with payment for invoice A
- Create an invoice B of $40 to Inmobilira CVA
- Confirm and send to CFDI
- reconcile the transaction with Invoice B
- Go to invoice B
- Click on button "Update payments"
- Then sheet CFDI and Download There is the second XML sent to CFDI with payment for invoices A and B

Invoice A payment was sent twice to CFDI

Expected behavior:
- The "Update payment" button should appear only once the invoice payment is fully reconciled.

Current behavior:
- The update payment button appear once the invoice is reconciled with a payment.

The method `_l10n_mx_edi_cfdi_invoice_get_payments_diff` is called twice, once to check whether it's needed to display the "Update button" and once when you try to update the payment (called only after clicking on said button).

opw-5432421

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#108355

**Steps to reproduce:**
- Install the `l10n_gt_edi` module and switch to a `GT Company`.
- Navigate to Invoicing > Vendors > Bills.
- Create a new vendor bill.
- Observe that `GT Document Type` includes `NABN - Nota de Pago Electrónica` option.
- `Confirm` the bill.
- Click `Credit Note`, add a reason, and click `Reverse`.
- Observe the available options in the `GT Document Type` field.

**Observation:**
The `NABN - Nota de Pago Electrónica` option is not available for 
vendor credit notes (`in_refund`), even though `NABN` is a GT-specific 
credit note document type.

**Root Cause:**
At [1], `NABN` is added for vendor bills (`in_invoice`, `in_receipt`) 
instead of vendor credit notes (`in_refund`).

**Fix:**
This commit ensures users can correctly select `NABN - Nota de Pago Electrónica` 
on GT vendor credit notes.

[1]:
https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/c7fa8c9c6f6830f5702fab4f6efaf3ac33f7fe72/l10n_gt_edi/models/account_move.py#L159-L160

opw-6252256

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#118711

**Description of the issue this PR addresses:**
----------------------------------------------
Visitors in livechat can trigger partner mention suggestions by typing the @ delimiter in the composer. However, visitors can only mention themselves or odoobot, which does not provide meaningful functionality in the context of a livechat conversation.

**Current behavior before PR:**
----------------------------------------------
- Visitors can type @ in the livechat composer and trigger partner mention suggestions.
- The suggestions only include the visitor themselves or odoobot.

**Desired behavior after PR is merged:**
----------------------------------------------
- The @ delimiter is disabled for visitors in livechat threads.
- Partner mention suggestions are no longer triggered for visitors.
- Internal users (operators) can still use @ mentions normally.

Task-5119068

----------------------------------------------
I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#267566
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#253551

**Steps to reproduce:**
- Install the `l10n_gt_edi` module and switch to a `GT Company`.
- Navigate to Invoicing > Vendors > Bills.
- Create a new vendor bill.
- Observe that `GT Document Type` includes `NABN - Nota de Pago Electrónica` option.
- `Confirm` the bill.
- Click `Credit Note`, add a reason, and click `Reverse`.
- Observe the available options in the `GT Document Type` field.

**Observation:**
The `NABN - Nota de Pago Electrónica` option is not available for 
vendor credit notes (`in_refund`), even though `NABN` is a GT-specific 
credit note document type.

**Root Cause:**
At [1], `NABN` is added for vendor bills (`in_invoice`, `in_receipt`) 
instead of vendor credit notes (`in_refund`).

**Fix:**
This commit ensures users can correctly select `NABN - Nota de Pago Electrónica` 
on GT vendor credit notes.

[1]:
https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/c7fa8c9c6f6830f5702fab4f6efaf3ac33f7fe72/l10n_gt_edi/models/account_move.py#L159-L160

opw-6252256

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#118711

### Description of the issue/feature this PR addresses:

getLocalYearAndWeek is used to get the year and week number for a given date. When a week overlaps 2 years, the week number is taken based on the year where the week has most days.

So if a week has 5 days in year Y and 2 in Y+1. The week is taken counting from Y (probably week 53). If a week has 3 days in Y and 4 in Y+1, then the week number is reset to 1.

The year, however did not follow the same logic, and was taken as the year of the last day of the ISO week.

### Current behavior before PR:

At the end of 2026, this will cause problems because the week number will run as:

* 2026, week 52 (all days in 2026, OK)
* 2027, week 53 (most days in 2026, last day in 2027, Not OK)
* 2027, week 1 (all days in 2027, OK)

### Desired behavior after PR is merged:

This commit aims to solve this issue by following the same logic for week number and year, so that the end of 2026 will go as:

* 2026, week 52 (no changes)
* 2026, week 53 (year is not incremented if week number is not reset)
* 2027, week 1 (no changes, but year is incremented when week number is reset)

---
I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#267656

**Steps to reproduce:**
- Install Accounting and l10n_ro_edi
- Switch to a Romanian localization (e.g. RO Company)
- Configure Romanian E-Factura

- Create an invoice with a product having a name longer than 100 chars
- Confirm the invoice
- Send E-Factura to SPV
- Fetch E-Factura status

**Issue:**
The invoice is rejected with the following error:
"[BR-RO-L100]-The allowed maximum number of characters for the Item name (BT-153) is 100."

**Similar issue with the product description:**
"[BR-RO-L200]-The allowed maximum number of characters for the Item description (BT-154) is 200."

**Similar issue with the note (i.e. Terms and Conditions):**
"[BR-RO-L300]-The allowed maximum number of characters for the Invoice note (BT-22) is 300."

**Solution:**
Truncate the name of the product to 100 chars in the electronic invoice, the description of the product to 200 and the note to 300.

opw-5964904




---
I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#265811

Problem:
When the selection is inside a `contenteditable="true"` element that is not the root editable, focusing away does not trigger a save.

Cause:
When the DOM contains a nested contenteditable structure like:

```html
<div class="odoo-editor-editable" contenteditable="true">
  abc
  <div contenteditable="false">
    ac
    <div contenteditable="true">a</div>
  </div>
</div>
```

With the selection inside the inner `contenteditable="true"`, the `blur` event is not triggered on `.odoo-editor-editable` when focusing away, because the active element is the inner div and `blur` does not bubble.

Solution:
Replace the `blur` listener with `focusout`, which bubbles from the inner `contenteditable="true"` up to `.odoo-editor-editable`, allowing `onBlur` to be called correctly.

Steps to reproduce:
- Open Project > Task.
- Add a `/column` block in the description.
- Focus inside any column and write some text.
- Click away to change tab.
- Reopen the description tab.
- The latest changes inside the columns were not saved.

opw-6227922

---
I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#266367

Steps to reproduce:
===================
1. Edit a page, add a Cover/Banner block.
2. Set its background to a video, paste an Instagram URL
3. Save and open the published page.

=> Instagram embed is broken (iframe shows nothing / error).

Cause:
=======
Background videos broke for Instagram because the BackgroundVideo interaction unconditionally appends "&enablejsapi=1" to the iframe URL on start. Instagram embed URLs have no query string (`//www.instagram.com/p/<id>/embed/`), so the append produces `//www.instagram.com/p/<id>/embed/&enablejsapi=1` the `&` ends up in the path and Instagram refuses to render.

The unconditional append is itself a regression from the public-widget → interaction refactor in [2].
The original code in 18.0 only added the param when `isYoutubeVideo && isMobileEnv`, as a workaround for old YouTube records that lacked it. Since [1], `enablejsapi=1` is already injected server-side in `html_editor/tools.py` / `web_editor/tools.py` when building YouTube autoplay embed URLs, so any YouTube background saved via the media dialog from 17.0 onward already has it. The JS append is redundant for YouTube and harmful for Instagram.

Solution:
=========
remove the unconditional append of `&enablejsapi=1` in the BackgroundVideo interaction

[1]: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/ca60af9dadc25adbc9eb159870ce1233a2886492
[2]: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/b9b3a605e0f4

opw-6233081

---
I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#267016

Introduce the foundational setup for the Kuwait payroll localization, serving as the base for subsequent enhancements, and implement core legal requirements including Social Security, End of Service (EOS), and leave logic.

The goal of this change is to establish a functional payroll framework compliant with Kuwait Labor Law. It provides a consistent baseline by:
1. Setting up demo data and standard working schedules for immediate testing.
2. Automating Social Security calculations for employee deductions and company contributions.
3. Handling specific leave computations, including tiered deductions for sick leave and monthly provisions for accounting accuracy.

Technical summary:
- Added demo company: "My Kuwaiti Company" and linked employees.
- Defined standard working schedule (9:00–17:00, Sunday–Thursday).
- Introduced Kuwait salary structure "Kuwait: Monthly Pay".
- Added Rule Parameters for Social Security:
  - Basic Pension: Employee (10%), Company (15%).
  - Unemployment: Employee (0.5%), Company (0.5%).
- Added Salary Rules for:
  - Social Security deductions and contributions.
  - End of Service Benefit: Logic for "Resigned" (<3y: 0%, 3-5y: 50%, 5-10y: 66%, >10y: 100%), "Fired" (0%), and standard calculation (15 days/year first 5 years, 1 month thereafter).
  - End of Service Provision: Monthly accrual calculation.
  - Annual Leave Provision and Remaining Leaves Compensation.
- Added "Kuwait Annual Leaves" Accrual Plan (2.5 days/month, starts after 6 months) and linked it to the Annual Leave type.
- Overridden `_get_worked_day_lines` in `hr.payslip` to implement tiered deduction logic for Sick Leaves (15 days full pay, 10 days 75%, etc.).
- Added `NET_COST` salary rule to correctly aggregate all employer costs for the Employee Cost Dashboard.
- Extended `hr.employee` to include Kuwait-specific Annual Leave Eligibility (default 30.0 days/year) displayed on the employee form.
- Extended `res.config.settings` to allow defining the default Annual Leave Time-off type for the company.

task-5116274

This commit introduces dynamic payslip language generation based on the DMFA work location's configured languages and the employee's language.
Key changes:
- Introduced payslip_language_ids in l10n_be.dmfa.location.unit, a many2many relation with res.lang.
- Enhanced the payslip PDF generation logic to follow these rules:
1. If the employee's language is listed among the DMFA location preferences, generate a single payslip in that language.
2. If the DMFA location has a single preferred language that differs from the employee's, generate:

One official payslip in the preferred language.

One translated payslip in the employee's language, with a warning stating it is for reference only.
3. If the DMFA location has multiple preferred languages, generate:

One official payslip in the first (French has a higher priority than Dutch, PM request) language.

A second version in the user language.
Overrode the PDF attachment generation method in l10n_be_hr_payroll to implement this behavior.
Related task: 4936594.

**Steps to reproduce:**
- Install the `l10n_gt_edi` module and switch to a `GT Company`.
- Navigate to Invoicing > Vendors > Bills.
- Create a new vendor bill.
- Observe that `GT Document Type` includes `NABN - Nota de Pago Electrónica` option.
- `Confirm` the bill.
- Click `Credit Note`, add a reason, and click `Reverse`.
- Observe the available options in the `GT Document Type` field.

**Observation:**
The `NABN - Nota de Pago Electrónica` option is not available for 
vendor credit notes (`in_refund`), even though `NABN` is a GT-specific 
credit note document type.

**Root Cause:**
At [1], `NABN` is added for vendor bills (`in_invoice`, `in_receipt`) 
instead of vendor credit notes (`in_refund`).

**Fix:**
This commit ensures users can correctly select `NABN - Nota de Pago Electrónica` 
on GT vendor credit notes.

[1]:
https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/c7fa8c9c6f6830f5702fab4f6efaf3ac33f7fe72/l10n_gt_edi/models/account_move.py#L159-L160

opw-6252256

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#118711

Several error are logged in the chatter when signing a payslip that includes an IMSS disability time off.

Steps to reproduce:
* Install l10n_mx_hr_payroll_account modules
* Switch to "INNOVACION VALOR Y DESARROLLO SA SA" company
* Go to Employees and open Cesar Osbaldo Cruz Solorzano
* Click on "Time Off" smart button and create a new time off with "Disability due to illness (IMSS)" type for "02/01/2026"(Any date).
* Go to Payroll > Payslips > Payslips and create a new pay run
* Select Salary Structure 'Mexico: Regular Pay', Pay Schedule 'Monthly' and the Period '01/01/2026 -> 01/31/2026'
* Click on Continue, select Cesar and click on Select
* Open the payslip, click on "Validate" and "Ok"
* Mark as paid, open the "Journal Entry" from the smart button and click on "Post".
* Back to the payslip, and click on "Generate CFDI" button.
* An error is added to the chatter.

### Missing node to declare disabilities
Original message
```py
An error occurred while signing the CFDI document with the government:
Code : NOM111 Message : Error no clasificado. Extra Info : El nodo
"Incapacidades" se debera informar si se incluye en percepciones la
clave 014 "Subsidios por Incapacidad" o bien en deducciones la clave 006
"Descuento por incapacidad".
```

Translated message
```py
An error occurred while signing the CFDI document with the government:
Code: NOM111 Message: Unclassified error. Extra Info: The "Incapacidades"
(Disabilities) node must be reported if the perception key 014
"Subsidios por Incapacidad" (Disability Subsidies) is included, or if
the deduction key 006 "Descuento por incapacidad" (Disability Deduction)
is included.
```

Legal Context:
According to Mexican law, IMSS disabilities must be declared in a specific XML node.

There are two primary scenarios for reporting these amounts:
* Deduction (Type 006): The employer does not pay for these days, as the IMSS is responsible for the payment to the employee.
  This is the most common scenario.

* Perception (Type 014): The employer pays for these days as a superior benefit. For example, by law, the IMSS does not pay for the first 3 days of a disability due to illness, and employers are not obligated to cover them either. However, companies offering superior benefits may choose to pay these days as a "Disability Subsidy."

Solution:
The chosen approach is to configure the Deduction node.
For the `l10n_mx_regular_pay_imss_disabilities` rule, the `l10n_mx_concept` has been set to `l10n_mx_concept_d6` (D06 - Disability Deduction). This ensures the required node is added.

### Missing "ImporteMonetario" attribute
Original message
```
An error occurred while signing the CFDI document with the government:
Code : NOM95 Message : El atributo Deduccion:Importe no es igual a la
suma de los nodos Incapacidad:ImporteMonetario, ya que la clave
expresada en Nomina.Deducciones.Deduccion.TipoDeduccion es "006".
```

Translated message
```
An error occurred while signing the CFDI document with the government:
Code: NOM95 Message: The attribute "Deduccion:Importe" does not match
the sum of the "Incapacidad:ImporteMonetario" nodes, as the key
expressed in "Nomina.Deducciones.Deduccion.TipoDeduccion" is "006".
```

Problem:
The "Incapacidades" node requires the "ImporteMonetario" attribute, which should represent the sum of the monetary value associated with the disabilities.

Solution:
Add the "ImporteMonetario" attribute and calculate its value using `l10n_mx_daily_salary`.

### Invalid "DiasIncapacidad" format
```py
An error occurred while signing the CFDI document with the government:
Code : 301 Message : XML mal formado Extra Info : Element
'{[http://www.sat.gob.mx/nomina12}Incapacidad](http://www.sat.gob.mx/nomina12%7DIncapacidad)', attribute
'DiasIncapacidad': '4.0' is not a valid value of the local atomic type.
```

Problem:
Altough the defaultdict where the values are sum up, `number_of_days` is
a float field, and when we get back the value, it is a float, adding for
example 4.0 instead of 4, which is not a valid value.

Solution:
Cast the value to int.

### Duplicate deduction on disabilities
```py
Wrong python code defined for:
- Employee: Cesar Osbaldo Cruz Solorzano
- Version: False
- Payslip: Salary Slip - Cesar Osbaldo Cruz Solorzano - 05/01/2026 - 05/15/2026
- Salary rule: ISR (Income Tax) (ISR)
- Error: TypeError('cannot unpack non-iterable NoneType object') while
evaluating
"
def find_rates(x, rates):
    for low, high, fix, rate in rates:
        if low <= x <= high:
            return low, high, fix, rate

gross = categories['GROSS']
result = 0
if gross:
    isr_table = payslip._rule_parameter('l10n_mx_isr_tables')[version.schedule_pay]
    low, high, fix, rate = find_rates(gross, isr_table)
    result = -((gross - low) * rate + fix)

period_factor = payslip._rule_parameter('l10n_mx_schedule_table')[version.schedule_pay]
if period_factor >= 15:
    period_factor = (period_factor / 30) * (365 / 12)
min_wage = payslip._rule_parameter('l10n_mx_daily_min_wage') * period_factor

if gross <= min_wage:
    result_qty = 0.0
"
```

Problem:
The IMSS disability amount is being deducted twice:
1. During "Worked Days" calculation, the IMSS disability is already not considered because the work entries belong to the "Unpaid Work Entry Types" of "Mexico: Regular Pay" structure.
2. During "Salary Computation", the `IMSS_DISABLE` salary rule deducts another time because it is in the `TAXABLE_ALW` category, and this one is deducted in the `NET` rule.

When the disability covers more than half of the period (e.g., 20 days in a monthly schedule), the double deduction causes the NET to become negative. This prevents the ISR rule from finding a correct stage in the tax tables, leading to a traceback.

Example: For a monthly wage of 30,000.0 and 5 disability days:
- The total amount in "Worked Days" is 25,000.0 (disabilities already deducted).
- The IMSS_DISABLE rule calculates -5,000.0, and when the NET rule is calculated, the disabilities are deducted again. Total NET becomes 16,843.84 instead of the expected 20,834.85.

Solution:
Change the rule category to `INTERMEDIARY_COMPUTATION` and avoid the double deduction when the `NET` is calculated, as it is already considered in the "Worked Days".

### Incorrect values in the XML
The signing process completes without errors, but some amounts in the generated XML are incorrect.

Problem:
The introduction of the Deduction 006 (Disability) directly impacts the calculation of the SubTotal and Total attributes in the Comprobante node.
For a monthly payslip with a wage of 30,000.00 (daily salary of 1,000.00) and 5 disability days (work risk), the values are calculated incorrectly as follows:
Attribute            | Calculation                      | Actual Value | Correct Value
---------------------|----------------------------------|--------------|--------------
Comprobante:SubTotal | Sum of Perceptions (P01)         | 25000.00     | 30000.00 (1)
Comprobante:Total    | SubTotal - Total Deductions (2)  | 15803.74     | 20803.74

(1) Must include the 5,000.00 from disabilities to balance the deduction.
(2) Total Deductions = D06 (5,000.00) + ISR (3,451.65) + IMSS (744.61) = 9,196.26.

The Total is currently undercalculated because the 5,000.00 is being
deducted from the SubTotal that already had those 5,000.00 excluded.

Solution:
Since the `SubTotal` is derived from Perceptions, and the "(P01)
Salaries, Wages, Stripes, and Day Labor" amount is driven by the
`GROSS_WITHOUT_HOLIDAY` rule, the disability amount must be added. This
balances the Deduction 006, ensuring `SubTotal` is correct.

### Absenteeism and Disabilities
By law, the calculation of IMSS contributions depends on these two types of unpaid days:
* Disabilities: Refers to medical leave issued by the Institute (IMSS).
* Absenteeism: Refers to unjustified leave; apply for periods of fewer than 8 days.

Source: [Artículo 31](https://www.imss.gob.mx/sites/all/statics/pdf/leyes/LSS.pdf)
Translated text:
Article 31. When wages are not paid due to the employee's absence from work, but the employment relationship persists, the monthly contribution shall be adjusted according to the following rules:

I. If the employee's absences are for periods of fewer than eight consecutive or non-consecutive days, contributions shall be calculated and paid for such periods only for the sickness and maternity insurance...
If the employee's absences are for periods of eight consecutive days or more, the employer shall be released from the payment of employer-employee contributions...

IV. In the case of absences covered by medical disabilities issued by the Institute, it shall not be mandatory to cover the employer-employee contributions, except regarding the retirement branch.

The following table summarizes the contribution requirements based on the type of absence:
Insurance Branch (RAMA)         | Section I (Absenteeism) | Section IV (Disability)
--------------------------------|-------------------------|------------------------
Sickness and Maternity          | Paid                    | Not Paid
Disability and Life             | Not Paid                | Not Paid
Severance and Old Age           | Not Paid                | Not Paid
Work Risk                       | Not Paid                | Not Paid
Daycare and Social Benefits     | Not Paid                | Not Paid
INFONAVIT                       | Not Paid                | Paid
Retirement                      | Not Paid                | Paid

The type of unpaid day to be considered depends on the specific insurance branch being calculated within the employer-employee contributions.

### Add test for cfdi with disabilities.

target: 19.0
task-6066160

Steps to reproduce:
===================
1. Add a Text Cover block to a page.
2. Optionally remove the text column so only the image remains.
3. Open the image column options and set "Visible on Mobile".
4. Switch to mobile view.

=> Image column is empty.

Root cause:
============
The image grid item is empty (background-image only) and relies on the parent `.o_grid_mode` being `display: grid` to be sized via `grid-area`. That `display: grid` rule is gated at `media-breakpoint-up(lg)` https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/d0424f2ffcf99ee59befe288150f1643b3fa0112/addons/web_editor/static/src/scss/web_editor.frontend.scss#L66 so below `lg` the item is a normal `display: block` element with no `col-*` class active (it has `g-col-lg-6 col-lg-6`, both `lg`-only) and no `g-height-*` CSS effect outside grid mode. The element therefore collapses to 0 height and the background image paints nothing.

This regressed when the mobile-hidden breakpoint was extended from `md` to `lg`:

- (See [1]) changed `d-none d-md-block` to `d-none d-lg-block o_snippet_mobile_invisible`. Before that, hiding only applied below `md`, where the image was rarely shown; afterwards the user can ask for it on mobile but gets an empty box.

Fix:
====
Give the empty `oe_img_bg` grid item a `min-height` below `lg` so it has something to paint when the user makes it mobile-visible.

[1]: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/079575b8ba645e7ec564967698d76a94d18022c1
opw-6228392


---
I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr

Steps to reproduce:
-------------------
- Install `l10n_din5008`
- Configure the document layout as DIN 5008
- Create and validate a delivery order
- Print the delivery slip

Issue:
------
The delivery slip still displays the information block (Order, Shipping Date, Total Weight, etc.), 
although the DIN 5008 layout is expected to hide it.

 Cause:
---------

The DIN 5008 layout made to hides the delivery slip `information` block: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/674c748458e6e29715ad3763f267802d921dce55/addons/l10n_din5008/static/src/scss/report_din5008.scss#L73

Unfortunately, this behavior was broken in this [commit](https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/28c1cc6025005cd0937afbc452a722235cc5a38d):

The main purpose of this commit was to fix the alignment of the delivery slip. 
As part of the fix, it added `class="report-wrapping-flexbox"`:

https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/674c748458e6e29715ad3763f267802d921dce55/addons/stock/report/report_deliveryslip.xml#L49

This prevents the information block from being hidden because of the CSS `!important` property:

https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/674c748458e6e29715ad3763f267802d921dce55/addons/web/static/src/webclient/actions/reports/bootstrap_review_report.scss#L59-L62

So when switching to the DIN 5008 format, it tries to hide the information block,
but the `!important` property prevents it from being hidden.

 Solution:
------------
Backport this [commit](https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/8d588f8198d9057311304e596c009a0795ca6ec7):

In this commit, instead of targeting the `#information_block` itself, 
it targets its children and hides all of them except `plan`.

As a result, all other children of the information block become hidden. 
Since there is no `!important` rule on the children, they can be hidden successfully. 
The information block then becomes empty and nothing is displayed.

<details>
  <summary>Click here to see the results:</summary>

  <p><strong>Before:</strong></p>
  <div class="image-row">
    <img  src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/7529dec3-977b-4bee-8c0c-5ce8c09a09e9" />
  </div>

  <p><strong>After:</strong></p>
  <div class="image-row">
    <img src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/96ed3f8f-c874-4059-a19f-5ea3b380aba3" />
  </div>
</details>

Why this fix:
--------------

These two different behaviors up to saas-18.4 and 19.0 led to a misunderstanding.

---

opw-6250072

---
I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr