Daily updates from Odoo
Friday, June 26, 2026
14 changes · 19.0
Resolved issues and error corrections
This update adjusts an automated accounting test so it only expects taxes linked to a fiscal position to be removed by the unit fiscal position. Taxes that are not tied to any fiscal position are now correctly preserved, making the test reflect the intended behavior more accurately.
Original PR description
map_tax on an empty fiscal position now preserves taxes with no fiscal_position_ids. Filter those out in test_tax_unit_auto_fiscal_position so the assertion only checks that taxes bound to a fiscal position are dropped by the unit FP. comunity PR: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/268273 task-id 623151
The Shop Floor view now correctly sorts manufacturing orders with unplanned work orders after those that are already planned. This brings the Shop Floor ordering in line with the rest of Manufacturing, making it easier to focus on the work that is ready to be executed.
Original PR description
## Problem In shop floor, MOs with unplanned work orders get sorted before MOs that have planned operations, which contradicts the normal nulls last sorting for work orders. ## Solution We will…
## Problem In shop floor, MOs with unplanned work orders get sorted before MOs that have planned operations, which contradicts the normal nulls last sorting for work orders. ## Solution We will update the sorting logic in the MrpDisplay component to more gracefully handle falsy date_start values, sorting them to the end. ## Steps to reproduce (runbot 19) 1. Create 2 MOs with an operation (work order) involving a work center, we'll call them A and B. 2. Open Shop Floor and open the work center that the MOs' work orders belong to, and note they are ordered A, B (this is fine, neither are planned so the precedence falls back to id 3. Go back to MO B and plan it. This should give it precedence in Shop Floor 4. Under the work center in Shop Floor, note that the MOs are still ordered A, B, despite B's work order having a start date and A's work order not having one To further motivate this being unintended, you can go to Manufacturing > Operations > Work Orders, and you'll see MO B's work order sitting at the top of the list. opw-6303323
This fix ensures invoice lines are properly included in tax reports when grouped taxes are used. It now recognizes the relevant child tax tags, so report totals are more accurate and no longer miss lines tied to those taxes.
Original PR description
When using group taxes, the base invoice lines only store the parent tax in the `account_move_line_account_tax_rel` table. Because of this, if a child tax within the group contains a specific tax report tag, the generic report query would previously fail to pick up those base lines. This commit updates the SQL join conditions in `l10n_ph_generic_report.py` to also match `account_tax.id` against the child taxes of the linked parent tax using the `account_tax_filiation_rel` table. This ensures that base lines are correctly reported under the tags of their respective child taxes. Task-6278098
Fixed an issue where partner mapping could be applied automatically on bank statements even when the reconciliation rule was still set to manual. This makes statement handling more consistent and ensures only the right reconciliation rules are suggested to users.
Original PR description
Users may define a reconciliation model for partner mapping by having a matching label and a counterpart item setting only the partner. If the user then opens the transactions or reconciliation menu and creates a statement, partner mapping will occur automatically, even if the model is still set to 'manual'. Steps to reproduce: - Create a reconciliation model with - Label: Contains 'mylabel' - Counterpart Items: set any partner - Open accounting app - From a Bank journal card click 'Transactions' - Create a statement line containing 'mylabel' Issue: Partner will be automatically set according to the reconciliation model, even if it has not been set to 'Automatic'. opw-5480282
This update makes the UNSPSC code 10171500, “Organic fertilizers and plant nutrients,” available again in product accounting. It ensures users can find and use the correct classification code when managing products.
Original PR description
The code 10171500 - Organic fertilizers and plant nutrients wasn't appearing. In the file that has the unspsc product codes this one is set to False. Steps to reproduce: - Activate module product_unspsc. - Go to product > accounting. - Verify that this code is not listed. Ticket [link](https://www.odoo.com/odoo/project.task/4461974) opw-4461974
This update ensures DIAN email templates in the Colombian localization are translated correctly when a new language is installed. It prevents untranslated invoice and credit note emails for users who add languages after the localization is already in place.
Original PR description
### Issue: When installing a new language on a database with `l10n_co_dian`, the DIAN email templates are not translated Languages already installed when `l10n_co_dian` is installed are correctly…
### Issue: When installing a new language on a database with `l10n_co_dian`, the DIAN email templates are not translated Languages already installed when `l10n_co_dian` is installed are correctly translated, as the copy happens at that moment Only languages installed afterwards are affected ### Cause: The DIAN email templates are created dynamically via `_create_dian_mail_templates` as copies of the `account` templates Because they are created at runtime, no translations exist for their XML IDs in the `l10n_co_dian` `.po` files The `TranslationImporter` finds nothing to import for them The fix hooks into `_load_module_terms` to sync translations from the source `account` templates to the DIAN ones whenever a new language is installed `TranslationImporter.save()` is used without `force_overwrite`, so existing translations on `noupdate` records are never replaced This is the standard way to push translations while preserving any manually modified values ### Notes: Languages installed before this fix are not updated Only newly installed languages will get the synced translations ### Steps to reproduce: - Install `l10n_co_dian` - Enable Developer Mode in Settings - Install any language (e.g. `fr_FR`) - Go in Settings > Technical > Email > Email Templates - Search for DIAN and open Invoice or Credit Note Before the fix, the DIAN invoice and credit note templates had untranslated name, description and body_html opw-6269979
This change fixes a test in the salary configuration flow by ensuring the employee’s private address is available when the test runs. It helps keep the test suite reliable and prevents false failures unrelated to the actual salary configuration behavior.
Original PR description
Task-6329628
This update fixes several issues in the website rental flow tests so they run consistently. It ensures payment setup is only prepared when the needed demo data exists, allows rental scenarios that include weekends, and narrows the shop page search so the right product is found reliably.
Original PR description
## [FIX] website_sale_renting_planning: prepare payment if demo is installed Before this commit, the demo `payment.provider` for the tests was being created in `setUpClass` this caused an issue…
## [FIX] website_sale_renting_planning: prepare payment if demo is installed Before this commit, the demo `payment.provider` for the tests was being created in `setUpClass` this caused an issue because `payment_demo` is not a dependency of this module, therefore it may not be installed while these tests are running and cause the tests to error at setup. After this commit, the `payment.provider` creation was moved into the tests after the check for `payment_demo` installation, ensuring that `payment_demo` would exist when a `payment.provider` is prepared. https://runbot.odoo.com/odoo/runbot.build.error/940273 ## [FIX] website_sale_renting_planning: unforbid weekend in tests Before this commit, the company had `renting_forbidden_sat` and `renting_forbidden_sun` enabled which made it not possible to rent products from website if the rental date included a saturday or sunday. This commit fixes that but setting `renting_forbidden_sat` and `renting_forbidden_sun` to False and allowing rental on all days of the week. https://runbot.odoo.com/odoo/runbot.build.error/940312 ## [FIX] website_sale_renting_planning: search for product in shop page Before this commit, the website `/shop` page would display all published products in the db, this could cause the `website_sale_renting_planning_buy_product` tour to fail if the setup product is not in the first page. After this commit, the `/shop` page is now access with a search on the product to ensure there won't be other products in the first page. https://runbot.odoo.com/odoo/runbot.build.error/940275
The default cash discount account codes in the German SKR03 template were incorrect and have been updated. This helps ensure accounting exports and postings use the right accounts, reducing the risk of reporting errors.
Original PR description
The default cash discount accounts referenced in the German skr03 template used the wrong account codes. The template has been updated with the right ones. task-4915939 opw-4909059 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#121692 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#121180
The Timesheets grid now shows the correct status color for a row even when an employee’s work schedule includes fractional hours. This prevents misleading orange or red indicators caused by tiny rounding differences, so users can trust the visual status shown for completed time entries.
Original PR description
## Issue In the Timesheets app, the color of the *Time Spent* cell at the end of a row indicates the current status of the timesheets based on the expected number of working hours. The selected color…
## Issue
In the Timesheets app, the color of the *Time Spent* cell at the end of a row indicates the current status of the timesheets based on the expected number of working hours. The selected color (green/orange/red) is sometimes wrong when an employee has a work schedule with fractional hours.
## Steps to reproduce
1. Install *Timesheets* (`timesheet_grid`)
2. For an employee E, edit the *Standard 40 hours/week* schedule:
- Change *Monday Afternoon* "Work to" column from 17:00 to 17:20.
3. In Timesheets > All Timesheets, go back one week and fill the timesheet for the employee E. We need 8 hours everyday but on Monday, where we need 8 hours and 20 minutes.
4. __The background of the *Time Spent* cell is orange, even though there's no overtime anywhere, and the value in the cell is precisely 40:20, which is the expected amount of hours worked.__
## Cause
When comparing the amount of hours worked and the expected amount of hours, small rounding errors occur. At this point of the execution:
https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/19b7f5a6961dbce7367c07fcc55eea1925832634/timesheet_grid/static/src/views/timesheet_grid/timesheet_grid_renderer.js#L157
We obtain the following values:
```js
> monday = section.cells[1]
> monday.value
8.333333333333336
> workingHours[monday.column.value]
8.333333333333332
> monday.value - workingHours[monday.column.value]
3.552713678800501e-15
```
This small difference differing from 0, the wrong color is selected by `_getSectionTotalCellBgColor`:
https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/19b7f5a6961dbce7367c07fcc55eea1925832634/timesheet_grid/static/src/views/timesheet_grid/timesheet_grid_renderer.js#L160-L172
## Fix
The same issue was fixed elsewhere by https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/commit/3340c0610ae6d7d3087f20da04309512771cc4b7. The same fix is applied here for consistency.
opw-6193181
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#121463This change fixes an issue that could stop AI-assisted field population from working in Studio forms. It ensures the system receives the field information in the expected format, preventing the error and allowing users to complete the action successfully.
Original PR description
**STEPS TO REPRODUCE** 1. Add an AI Studio field in the employee appraisal form view (can be a regular text field or other) 2. Add `employee_feedback` to the prompt using '/' 3. Click the AI button to populate the field 4. Error occurs: `TypeError: unsupported operand type(s) for +: 'OrderedSet' and 'list'` **CAUSE** In any model, the read function expects the argument `fields` to be a list. When using AI fields in Studio, the fields argument is stored as an OrderedSet instead of a list, causing errors when performing operations. opw-5954203
This update fixes a timing issue that could add an extra minute to shifts planned on round-the-clock schedules. As a result, allocated time now matches the intended shift length, improving the accuracy of planning reports and employee schedules.
Original PR description
**Problem:** On a round-the-clock (0h-24h) working schedule, shifts created from a shift template that spans more than one day get one extra minute added to their allocated time: an 8-hour shift…
**Problem:** On a round-the-clock (0h-24h) working schedule, shifts created from a shift template that spans more than one day get one extra minute added to their allocated time: an 8-hour shift shows 08:01. **Steps to reproduce:** 1. Create a working schedule with a 00:00 -> 24:00 attendance for every day (24h/day, "Full Day"). 2. Assign an employee to that schedule. 3. Create a multi-day-span shift template (e.g. 16:00 -> 00:00, 2 days). 4. Plan a shift for that employee using the template. 5. Observe the Allocated Time shows one minute more than expected (08:01). **Current behavior:** Allocated Time is one minute too long (e.g. 08:01 instead of 08:00), which throws off the customer's planning reports. **Expected behavior:** Allocated Time matches the template duration exactly (08:00). **Cause of the issue:** In `_calculate_start_end_dates`, the end of a multi-day-span shift is computed with `resource.calendar_id.plan_days(...)`. On a 0h-24h calendar each day ends at `time.max` (23:59:59.999999), so `plan_days` returns an end datetime carrying those stale seconds. The following `end.replace(hour=..., minute=...)` overwrites only the hour and minute, leaving `second=59, microsecond=999999`. The slot is therefore ~1 minute longer than intended, and `allocated_hours` rounds that up to 08:01. **Fix:** Resetting seconds and microseconds when rebuilding the end datetime keeps the slot aligned to the template's whole-minute boundary, regardless of how the underlying calendar represents the end of day. The hour/minute already come from the template, so the leftover sub-minute precision from `plan_days` is never meaningful and is what produces the drift. opw-6265238
This update corrects how the current year’s earnings are classified and makes the Luxembourg balance sheet report calculate the carried-forward result more simply. It helps ensure the report shows the right figures for year-end financial statements.
Original PR description
This commit addresses the account type for the current year earnings and simplifies the calculation for the "Result brought forward" line in the Luxembourg balance sheet reports.
Modifications:
* Changed the account type of account 142 ("Result for the financial year") from `equity_unaffected` to standard `equity`.
* Simplified the formula for the Balance Sheet line "Profit or loss brought forward" (codes `LU_BS_319` and `LU_BSABR_319`).
* The new formula simply targets the `14` accounts while explicitly excluding `142`.
Community PR: odoo/odoo#272362
Ticket [link](https://www.odoo.com/odoo/project.task/6059571)
opw-6059571This change fixes an access error that could block database owners from synchronizing their databases. By applying the correct permissions check earlier in the process, the synchronization flow now continues without interruption.
Original PR description
The aim of this commit is to allow the databases_user to synchronize their databases. Context: The commit https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/846eb51a02baaf2e4f6e6780f8d0ceb23322c38b introduced a change of behavior in stable that performs some more check on access rights. Before this commit: The checks introduced by the commit resulted in an access error. There wasn't any groups on the action itself resulting in a check of the access right "write" on the model. As the model is `project.project` and a databases_user might not be granted write access on the project itself, it resulted in an access error. After this commit: The flow continues smoothly. As the action has now a group set on it, this is checked first and match the proper access right. opw-6329058