## Summary

Minimal alternative: make the "Inventory at Date" wizard open the same rich stock report view instead of the basic one.

### Problem
The wizard opens `stock.view_stock_product_tree` (basic product list) instead of `stock.product_product_stock_tree` (full stock report with action buttons and search panel).

### Solution
Change the wizard's `open_at_date()` to use the stock report view and its associated search view. The wizard flow is preserved — this is purely a view swap.

### Changes
- `stock_quantity_history.py`: Changed `tree_view_id` from `view_stock_product_tree` to `product_product_stock_tree`, added `search_view_id` for the stock report search view

### Alternative
See #263507 for a more integrated approach that replaces the wizard entirely with a date picker in the search panel.

[Task #6152466](https://www.odoo.com/odoo/rd-fun-logistics-966/6152466)

---
I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#263509

### Description of the issue/feature this PR addresses:

The stock move value was inline-editable in the moves list, which is
misleading. Editing it directly behaves inconsistently across cost
methods: for FIFO products the edit updates the remaining value, but
for AVCO products there is no mechanism to propagate it, so the change
has no effect. The direct edit also bypasses the audited revaluation
channel, the Adjust Valuation wizard (product.value), which records the
user, date and justification.

Disable direct modification by marking the field read-only by default,
so manual revaluation always goes through Adjust Valuation. Internal
valuation writes are unaffected.

### Current behavior before PR:

The value field is editable in the stock move list view.

<img width="1890" height="460" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/8ddc6495-4beb-4481-bdbf-2a44b70f3784" />

### Desired behavior after PR is merged:

The value field should not be editable. Users should use the Adjust Valuation wizard to ensure the operation is auditable.

@qrtl QT6826

---
I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#267360

### Commit 1:

We fetch and store bills if we're able to parse and store them correctly. but in case we make a mistake

1. The cron gets stuck trying to fetch the problematic bill.
2. Users have no clue that there is a bill on KSeF that they have to fetch manually.

---

1. Save the bill on a savepoint, to make sure one problematic bill doesn't affect others
2. Create all bills as draft first so that users have a reference to fallback to in case the have to do manual fetching.

---

task-6310321

---

### Commit 2:

Issues:

1. For a db with company_1 and company_2, when company_1 sends an invoice to company_2 via KSeF (out_invoice with a ksef number),
company_2 in the same database can't fetch the corresponding bill because there is a move with the same KSeF number.
2. The date difference between `from` and `to` in the `dateRange` must not exceed 3 months as explained in the documentation
https://api.ksef.mf.gov.pl/docs/v2/index.html#tag/Pobieranie-faktur/paths/~1invoices~1query~1metadata/post

Fixes:

1. Change the unique constraint and the domain to allow same KSeF number per different companies.
2. Minimize the `to` parameter with `from` + 2 months.
3. Increase the TIMEOUT to 30 seconds as 10 seconds is too small.

task-6260645

---

I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#272689
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#270511

This commit adds a route for Digital Asset Links (`assetlinks.json`)
that link the domain with the Android Mobile App.

Also we adapt some functions authentication/registration so Odoo accept
request origin from the mobile App.
The origin should be `android:apk-key-hash:BASE64(SHA256(APP_SIGNATURE))`

Note: the `/.well-known/assetlinks.json` file should be serve on port
HTTPS (443) without that the Android Digital Asset Links will fail.

Url for debugging Digital Asset Links
https://digitalassetlinks.googleapis.com/v1/assetlinks:check?source.web.site=https://MY-DOMAIN.local&relation=delegate_permission/common.get_login_creds&target.android_app.package_name=com.odoo.mobile&target.android_app.certificate.sha256_fingerprint=D6:73:20:02:CA:2D:01:C9:FD:FC:94:73:5A:D0:73:CF:2C:36:10:29:1F:4B:F7:5D:91:C2:1D:37:B2:18:E8:91

https://developers.google.com/digital-asset-links
https://developer.android.com/identity/passkeys/create-passkeys
https://developer.android.com/identity/credential-manager/prerequisites

opw-6279212

---
I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#270551

**Issue**
Quantity on subcontracted receipts could be overridden after running the
scheduler.

**Steps to reproduce**
- Create a subcontracting product
- Create a PO for 10 units of that product
- Go to receipt and open Subcontracting Productions'
- Change the quantity to 5
- Enable debug mode.
- Run Inventory/Operations/Procurement: run scheduler
- Return to the receipt
-> The receipt quantity is reset to 10 instead of remaining at 5.

**Cause**
Since the refactor introduced in commit: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/fc66e2d4eb638f1486e69cd5920f02c787055da1,
subcontracting receipt moves are no longer automatically picked when the production quantity is modified.
In particular, this test case protects that behavior:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/f7fb0a941d6bac39b7057db36f57be079559912c/addons/mrp_subcontracting/tests/test_subcontracting.py#L1629-L1631
When the scheduler runs:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/f7fb0a941d6bac39b7057db36f57be079559912c/addons/stock/models/stock_rule.py#L731
it computes the moves to assign:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/f7fb0a941d6bac39b7057db36f57be079559912c/addons/stock/models/stock_rule.py#L706-L710
However, subcontracting moves are still included in the assignment domain:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/f7fb0a941d6bac39b7057db36f57be079559912c/addons/stock/models/stock_rule.py#L680-L688
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/f7fb0a941d6bac39b7057db36f57be079559912c/addons/mrp/models/stock_rule.py#L127-L129
As a result, they are reassigned if they are not already picked:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/f7fb0a941d6bac39b7057db36f57be079559912c/addons/stock/models/stock_move.py#L1931-L1937

opw-6229668

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#270837

*: website, website_mass_mailing

__Problem__
In some cases, popup snippets can be dropped inside another popup.
This shouldn't be possible. Moreover, it produces the following error:
`TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'after')`.

This can happen in multiple scenarios:
- After saving a custom snippet, the snippets are reloaded but
  `disableUndroppableSnippets` is not called again, although the
  snippets should be filtered again.
- `NewsletterPopupPlugin` registers `.o_newsletter_popup` in the
  `so_snippet_addition_selector` resource, bypassing the more
  restrictive `dropzone_selector` of `PopupOptionPlugin`.
- Popups are not disabled when the cookie bar is open because we don't
  take `excludeAncestor` into account in `DisableSnippetsPlugin`.

__Fix__
- Trigger an event whenever the snippets are loaded and call
  `disableUndroppableSnippets` when it is.
- Remove the redundant `NewsletterPopupPlugin`.
- Filter `dropAreaEls` with `excludeAncestor` in `DisableSnippetsPlugin`.

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#272273
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#269864

__To reproduce__
1. Drop a popup on the website.
2. Click twice rapidly on the popup show/hide toggle in the sidebar.
=> The popup visibility will be in an inconsistent state compared
   to the toggle's eye icon.

__Reason__
Bootstrap ignores any call to show/hide if the popup is still
transitioning.

__Fix__
- Set `_isTransitioning` to `false` to trick Bootstrap into firing the
event regardless of its current state.
- When hide/show are triggered in quick succession, the modal can enter an
inconsistent state with `.show` class but `display: none` style (hide removes
`.show` immediately, show restores it with `display: block`, then hide applies
`display: none` after animation). Dispatching `transitionend` event before
resetting `_isTransitioning` ensures Bootstrap completes its state transitions.

__Note__
This commit also fixes `custom_popup_snippet`, which fails
non-deterministically with the following error:
`TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'after')`

This error occurs when trying to add a popup inside another popup
that never closes due to this bug.

runbot-939039

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#269782

### **Issue**

Self-orders created through the mobile QR menu or kiosk were not displaying table information in the Order Info section of the payment screen.

### **Root Cause**

The Order Details dialog relied on `order.getTable()` to retrieve table information. However, self-orders only store the table reference through `table_id`, which was not properly handled when rendering the dialog, resulting in missing table information.

### **Solution**

This PR introduces the following changes:

* Add a dedicated `getTableInfo()` helper in `pos_restaurant` to retrieve table information from the order.
* Use `getTableInfo()` when building the Order Details dialog fields.
* Allow self-order flows to provide table information through `table_id`, ensuring table details are displayed correctly.

### **Steps to Reproduce**

1. Enable the following options in POS Configuration:

   * QR Menu & Ordering
   * Service at Table
   * Online Payment
2. Open a self-order from the mobile QR menu
3. Select a table and complete the payment
4. Open the POS session
5. Open the paid self-order
6. Click the **Details** button on the right side

### **Video Reproduction**

https://drive.google.com/file/d/138AoJCTF1HNlCGFgk9BRTb0UTai-uXX7/view?usp=sharing

### **Before**

Table information was not displayed in the **Order Info** section for self-orders.

### **After**

Table information is now correctly displayed for self-orders.


opw-6179516


---
I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#271248
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#264046

Description of the issue/feature this PR addresses:

This error occurs when a model has properties and a `computed` field or `onchange` method depends on them.

`record.update()` is asynchronous. When an onchange or computed field is triggered, an additional request is sent to the server, increasing the time required to complete the update. See:

https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/727fe7412bb37c1664106625e248264d2aab6809/addons/web/static/src/model/relational_model/record.js#L1207-L1211

However, `PropertiesField` is rendered before the `update` is completed. See:

https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/727fe7412bb37c1664106625e248264d2aab6809/addons/web/static/src/views/fields/properties/properties_field.js#L86

As a result, the property labels are not yet available and the following traceback is raised:

`TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'getRootNode')
`
After this commit, the update is awaited before rendering PropertiesField, ensuring that the property labels are available.

**Steps to reproduce:**

1. Install the example module. [project_task_property.zip](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/29138424/project_task_property.zip)
2. Open or create a project task.
3. From the Action menu, click `Add Properties`.

The error is raised.

<img width="1520" height="956" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a3051ddf-5af0-4d3a-8ff7-c3fb4f7a69d2" />


TT63331
@Tecnativa @pedrobaeza

---
I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#272653
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#271082

Module: l10n_it_pos

Steps to reproduce:
- In the POS settings, enable "Automatic Receipt Printing";
- Enable "ePos Printer" to make the "Skip Preview Screen" option appear;
- Disable "Skip Preview Screen";
- Disable "ePos Printer";
- Set up an Italian Fiscal Printer;
- Open a POS session and process a first order.

Issue: After the first receipt, no other messages (price display, receipt, open register) are sent to the fiscal printer. A page reload is required.

Cause:
When "Automatic Receipt Printing" is true but "Skip Preview Screen" is false, a race condition occurs. `afterOrderValidation` triggers a print job while simultaneously transitioning to the `ReceiptScreen`. When the `ReceiptScreen` mounts, it triggers a second fiscal print job before the first has resolved. This creates a deadlock in `toHtml` of  `renderService`, permanently blocking the printer queue.

Solution:
Since the italian localisation sending the receipt to the fiscal printer is mandatory, the printing route is now tied to the "Skip Preview Screen" option.
UI settings are adjusted to hide the redundant auto-print checkbox when an IT fiscal printer is configured.

Community PR: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/256932

[opw-5979212](https://www.odoo.com/odoo/project/49/tasks/5979212)

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#121779
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#112654

Module: l10n_it_pos

Steps to reproduce:
- In the POS settings, enable "Automatic Receipt Printing";
- Enable "ePos Printer" to make the "Skip Preview Screen" option appear;
- Disable "Skip Preview Screen";
- Disable "ePos Printer";
- Set up an Italian Fiscal Printer;
- Open a POS session and process a first order. Issue: After the first receipt, no other messages (price display, receipt, open register) are sent to the fiscal printer. A page reload is required.

Issue: After the first receipt, no other messages (price display, receipt, open register) are sent to the fiscal printer. A page reload is required.

Cause:
When "Automatic Receipt Printing" is true but "Skip Preview Screen" is false, a race condition occurs. `afterOrderValidation` triggers a print job while simultaneously transitioning to the `ReceiptScreen`. When the `ReceiptScreen` mounts, it triggers a second fiscal print job before the first has resolved. This creates a deadlock in `toHtml` of  `renderService`, permanently blocking the printer queue.

Solution:
Since the italian localisation sending the receipt to the fiscal printer is mandatory, the printing route is now tied to the "Skip Preview Screen" option.

Enterprise PR: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/pull/112654

[opw-5979212](https://www.odoo.com/odoo/project/49/tasks/5979212)

---
I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#272112
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#256932

Issue:
----------------------------------------
Doing a search on skills, the employees with the skill but no slot in the time frame aren't shown.

Steps to reproduce:
----------------------------------------
- Install `planning_hr_skills`
- Make sure an employee has the skill "English" and no slots
- Open Planning and type "English" in the search bar, click to search on Skills
- The employee does not show up

Cause:
----------------------------------------
Using the search view on skills, a filter on `resource_ids` is in the domain with a `OR`:

https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/5d6d16aae43ffda1532cfa4b06fdcddd7e5b0fcc/planning_hr_skills/views/planning_slot_views.xml#L9

Then a new filter on `resource_ids` is added [here](https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/5d6d16aae43ffda1532cfa4b06fdcddd7e5b0fcc/planning_hr_skills/models/planning_slot.py#L14-L43) to do the search on the skill names: `[('resource_ids', 'in', matching_resource_ids)]`.

The domain is then something like this: 
`['&', ('resource_ids', 'in', matching_resource_ids), '|', ('resource_ids', '=', False), ('employee_skill_ids', 'ilike', 'English')]`.

Since fbf8b2ac67c71ca0abfc75df543069696bd2d29b the resulting domain passes through `filter_map_domain()`. `filter_map_domain()` will only keep the leaves on `resource_ids` and the default `AND` will be used between them resulting in: 
`['&', ('resource_ids', 'in', matching_resource_ids), ('resource_ids', '=', False)]` 
which fetches no resources.

So `_group_expand_resource_ids()` doesn't expand.

Solution:
----------------------------------------
Instead of adding the new leaf to retrieve the resources with the right skills, we replace the leaf on `employee_skill_ids`. This ensures the `OR` operations are kept by `filter_map_domain()`.

opw-6296755

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#120669

Currently, flexible employees can request a multi-day leave spanning a public holiday when the leave type includes public holidays in duration. However, requesting the public holiday date alone is rejected.

### **Steps to reproduce:**
- Create a public holiday.
- Create a time off type with "Public Holiday Included" enabled.
- Select/create an employee with a flexible work schedule and its time zone must be same as admin.
- Request a time off on the public holiday date only.

### **Observed Behavior:**
The request is rejected because its duration is computed as 0 days.

### **Expected Behavior:**
The request should be allowed and count as 1 day, consistent with the multi-day request behavior.

### **Root Cause:**
At [1], a dedicated duration computation path is used for single-day leaves of flexible employees. This logic always retrieves overlapping public holidays and computes the leave duration based on the remaining intervals. As a result, a leave requested entirely on a public holiday is computed as 0 days, even when `include_public_holidays_in_duration` is enabled.

[1]- https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/242f6d3cf7288853f163ac6986a3b7aa4279efaf/addons/hr_holidays/models/hr_leave.py#L436-L444

### **Fix:**
This commit ensures that the `include_public_holidays_in_duration` setting is taken into account when computing single-day leave durations for flexible employees

**opw-6284768**

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#272217
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#269743

**Steps to reproduce:**
* Install the **l10n_in_reports** module.
* Go to **Accounting → Configuration → Settings**, and enable **Multi-Currencies**.
* Activate a foreign currency (e.g., USD) and set an exchange rate.
* Create a new vendor bill for an Indian vendor, setting the currency to USD.
* Add lines to the bill and apply IGST/GST taxes, then confirm the bill.
* Go to **Accounting → Reporting → GST Return Period** and initiate GSTR-2B matching for the period corresponding to the bill (using a valid JSON payload where the amounts are correctly reported in INR).

**Observed behavior:**
* The vendor bill is incorrectly marked as "Partially matched" instead of "Fully matched", accompanied by an exception stating that the total amount as per GSTR-2B does not match.

**Cause:**
* The GSTR-2B data fetched from the GST portal always reports values in the company's base currency (INR).
* The `match_bills` method was directly comparing the GSTR-2B INR amounts ( `bill_total` and `bill_taxable_value`) against the bill's `amount_total` and `amount_untaxed` fields.
* Because these fields return values in the document's foreign currency (e.g., USD), the mismatch triggers an exception and flags the bill as partially matched.

**Fix:**
* Modified the matching logic to compare GSTR-2B values against `abs(amount_total_signed)` and `abs(amount_untaxed_signed)`.
* This ensures that the amounts evaluated during reconciliation are always correctly converted and compared in the company's base currency (INR).

opw-6311097

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#121837
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#120967

Currently, an error occurs when a user insert a dynamic product snippet onto website.

**Steps to Reproduce:**

 - Install `website_sale` without demo data.
 - Go to `Website` > `eCommerce` > `Products` > `Ribbons`.
 - Open any ribbon and set `Assign` to `When New`.
 - Go to the `Website` > `Edit` > drag and drop the `Catalog` block, and select a `Dynamic Product` 
   block (`Generic Product Template (customizable)` [ref](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ZYeQA8DhfYAf_jbPwL-tZXaVi1YAyFbd/view?usp=drive_link)).

`TypeError: unsupported operand type(s) for -: 'datetime.datetime' and 'bool'`

After this [recent commit], when a user drops a dynamic product snippet, the system attempts 
to set the ribbon value [1]. If no product records are available, it falls back to using sample products [2]. 
These sample products are virtual records created with model.new() [3] [4] and are not stored in 
the database, so they do not have a publish date.
When auto-assigned ribbon with the When New option assign, the system compares the ribbon's 
new period with the product's publish date. Since the sample products do not have a publish 
date, this comparison raises an error [5].

This commit ensures that the comparison between new period and publish date is only 
performed when the product has a valid publish date.

[recent commit]: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/f427f795c24ee37ee02302642b77bfc314a9ea43

[1]- https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/b70330df7dc2017ab592b075c8ad8e048f671d90/addons/website_sale/templates/snippets/product_snippet_template_data.xml#L52-L58

[2]: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/b70330df7dc2017ab592b075c8ad8e048f671d90/addons/website/models/website_snippet_filter.py#L75-L78

[3]- https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/b70330df7dc2017ab592b075c8ad8e048f671d90/addons/website/models/website_snippet_filter.py#L210-L215

[4]: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/b70330df7dc2017ab592b075c8ad8e048f671d90/addons/website_sale/models/website_snippet_filter.py#L62-L95

[5]: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/b70330df7dc2017ab592b075c8ad8e048f671d90/addons/website_sale/models/product_ribbon.py#L121-L124

sentry-7528296918

---
I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#268836

Issue:
Sending Debit Notes to a tax authority can cause the following error: "ValueError: The following child node is not defined in the template: DebitNote/cbc:BuyerReference"

Steps to reproduce on any database with DIAN and Colombian localization:

  1. Create a new "Sales" type journal. Then, check the checkbox “Nota de Debito”.
  2. Find a res.partner with a ref field, or add a ref field to any partner.
  3. Make an invoice using the partner found in step 2. Ensure it uses a tax. Confirm it.
  4. Send that invoice to DIAN.
  5. Create a Debit Note for that invoice. Use the journal created in step 1.
  6. Add a product, price, and tax to the debit note. Confirm it.
  7. Send the debit note to DIAN.
  
Explanation:
The `_add_invoice_header_nodes` method on the AccountEdiXmlUbl_21 model adds a BuyerReference node unconditionally. (See account_edi_xml_ubl_21.py.) But the DebitNote XML template does not include a BuyerReference element (see ubl_21_debit_note.py). This caused a ValueError when assembling the XML for debit note documents.

Solution: The fix overrides this in the Colombian localization by clearing the BuyerReference value when the document type is "debit_note". That way, the node is omitted from the output.

opw-6181039

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#121458
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#121422

### Steps to reproduce:

- In the settings enable: Multi-Steps Routes
- Put your warehouse in delivery in 2 steps
- On the receipt operation type change the return operation type to be "pick" by default.
- Create and confirm a PO for 1 unit of P
- Validate the receipt > return > Create the return for 1 unit
- Change the operation type of the return from Pick to Delivery to return the product in one step.
- Validate the return
#### > The qty_received is updated from 1 to 2 instead of 0.

### Cause of the issue:

Updating the `picking_type_id` of the return will also update the `location_dest_id` to the default values:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/89807c10c20fb533124b18815f307fc3c380528d/addons/stock/models/stock_picking.py#L1138-L1147
However, the default values of the `Delivery` is "Partner/customer". As such, the location dest of the move is also updated to be "Partner/customer". Now the issue is that the `qty_received` only considers moves to be returned if the location dest usage is not 'supplier':
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/89807c10c20fb533124b18815f307fc3c380528d/addons/purchase/models/purchase_order_line.py#L226-L231 https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/89807c10c20fb533124b18815f307fc3c380528d/addons/purchase_stock/models/purchase_order_line.py#L55-L67 https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/89807c10c20fb533124b18815f307fc3c380528d/addons/purchase_stock/models/purchase_order_line.py#L76-L77 https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/89807c10c20fb533124b18815f307fc3c380528d/addons/purchase_stock/models/stock_move.py#L129-L131

opw-6292918

---
I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#270571
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#269867

### Contains the following commits:

https://github.com/odoo/o-spreadsheet/commit/e359501309 [REL] 19.4.1 [Task: 0](https://www.odoo.com/odoo/2328/tasks/0)
https://github.com/odoo/o-spreadsheet/commit/5adffa5ca1 [FIX] config: bump node version in GH action [Task: 0](https://www.odoo.com/odoo/2328/tasks/0)
https://github.com/odoo/o-spreadsheet/commit/feea883b1d [IMP] pivot: give full dimension to pivot normaliser [Task: 6023622](https://www.odoo.com/odoo/2328/tasks/6023622)

Co-authored-by: Florian Damhaut (flda) <flda@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Anthony Hendrickx (anhe) <anhe@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Alexis Lacroix (laa) <laa@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Lucas Lefèvre (lul) <lul@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Adrien Minne (adrm) <adrm@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Ronak Mukeshbhai Bharadiya (rmbh) <rmbh@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Dhrutik Patel (dhrp) <dhrp@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Rémi Rahir (rar) <rar@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Pierre Rousseau (pro) <pro@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Vincent Schippefilt (vsc) <vsc@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Marceline Thomas (matho) <matho@odoo.com>

A tax created without a fiscal position (empty fiscal_position_ids) is conceptually an "All" tax: it should apply across every fiscal position, including the empty ones used for tax units.

Problem

map_tax drops every tax when the FP has no mapping, including the "All" ones that should pass through.
action_open_related_taxes only lists the FP's tax_ids, so "All" taxes are invisible from the FP form.
The Taxes stat button is hidden whenever the FP has no tax_ids.
action_update_fpos_values invokes the field computes directly, so tax and balance lines fall out of sync after an FP change.

Fix

map_tax: when the FP has no tax_ids, return the input taxes whose fiscal_position_ids is empty (the "All" ones) instead of an empty recordset.
action_open_related_taxes: extend the domain to also include taxes bound to no fiscal position.
partner_view: drop the invisible="not tax_ids" guard on the Taxes stat button.
action_update_fpos_values: route the deferred computes through _check_balanced and _sync_dynamic_lines so tax lines stay in sync after the update.

task-id [6231514](https://www.odoo.com/odoo/project/967/tasks/6231514)
---
I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#272350
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#268273

### Steps to reproduce:
- Download Calendar and Contacts app
- Go to the Setting -> Companies -> Manage companies; make sure there are at least two companies
- Go to the Setting -> Users -> Manage users; make sure the current logged-in user has access to both companies
- Create a another user who also have access to both companies
- Search for the new user in contacts -> Assign the current company to the contact -> Through the internal link of the company, go to sales and purchase tab -> assign the same company in the company field
- Switch the company of the logged in user to the other company
- Open the test contact form, use the meeting smart button and create a new meeting
- Open the kanban contact view

 **> Access Error: Uh-oh! Looks like you have stumbled upon some top-secret records.**
### Cause of Issue:
When trying to view the search results in kanban view, the `meeting_count` is calculated for each contact. Hence,`_compute_meeting_count()` is called which calls `_compute_meeting()`. https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/f39785bcddd1eb5b7fb503d053c9bb66e2a0f15c/addons/calendar/models/res_partner.py#L49-L54 Since the above section tries to access `partner.parent_id` each loop, it reaches a `parent_id` that's not accessible for the current user.

### Fix:
Since we need to access `parent_id` to be able to calculate meeting count for the full tree of partners, `sudo()` is used to get all partners, but meetings are computed for ancestors who are in `self_ids` only so that we still remain within scope.
Same old logic is used to propagate meetings for every ancestor, but dictionary lookups are used to enhance performance.

opw-5874204

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#272832
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#248985

Steps to reproduce
------------------
1. Set a default tax on the "Cash Difference Gain" account (e.g. a 25%
   sales tax) -- required in some countries like Denmark (cf 5972690).
2. Open a PoS session, count more cash than expected at closing.
3. Try to close the session.

-> Error message shows up "The journal entry reached an invalid
state..." ... "The journal entry must always have exactly one journal
item involving the bank/cash account"

What's happening
----------------
PoS creates a bank statement line with the gain account as counterpart,
resulting in 2 lines: cash +10, gain -10. Since the gain account has a
default tax, `_sync_tax_lines` adds a tax line of -2.5 on top, which
makes the move unbalanced by 2.5. Then `_sync_unbalanced_lines` adds a
4th line to fix it, on the line returned by
`_get_automatic_balancing_account`, which is `journal.default_account_id`,
i.e. the cash account itself for a cash journal.

So we end up with 2 lines on that same cash account, which a bank
statement line move doesn't allow -> Error.

The fix
-------
In `_post_statement_difference`, precompute the base and tax split
ourselves and build the statement line's `line_ids` directly (e.g. for
+10 and a 25% tax: cash +10, gain -8, tax -2). The move is balanced
from creation, so `_sync_tax_lines` and `_sync_unbalanced_lines` don't
have to touch it.

Note that we force the tax computation to be in 'force_price_include'
mode, as the counted cash difference is a gross amount (physical money
in the drawer). This way the tax is always extracted from the cash
amount, regardless of how the tax is configured (included or excluded
in price). Same pattern is already used by `hr_expense` (cf
`hr_expense.models.account_move_line._compute_totals`).

opw-5972690

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#271921
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#257892

The full composer builds default_partner_ids by doing recipient.persona.id over allRecipients. When a recipient is not linked to a partner, the chatter input inserts it with persona: false here:

https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/28c11a068b2ecf521f8ba1da271ebee24f5345ae/addons/mail/static/src/core/web/recipients_input.js#L151

false.id is undefined, so the wizard gets a bad id and clicking the recipient tag crashes with `Invalid ids list: false`.

The persona is false because /mail/partner/from_email returns no partner for unresolved emails when the user does not have base.group_partner_manager. That matches the gate _prepare_post_data already uses for the simple post flow:

https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/28c11a068b2ecf521f8ba1da271ebee24f5345ae/addons/mail/controllers/thread.py#L153,L155

The full composer just was not handling that case.

Filter out persona-less recipients from default_partner_ids so the wizard only sees real partner ids. The full composer now drops them the same way the simple post path already does.

Steps to reproduce:
1. As Administrator, create a user with the Sales group only (no Contact Creation).
2. Log in as that user.
3. Open a CRM lead whose Email is set but Customer is empty.
4. Click Send message.
5. Click the expand icon to open the full composer.
6. Click the recipient tag in the To field.

=> Recipient shows as Unnamed and clicking it raises an RPC error.

Ticket [link](https://www.odoo.com/odoo/project.task/5974081)
opw-5974081


---
I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#271422
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#251780

When a user chooses the "Double Opt-in" template (or others using
`_create_records_with_xml_ids`), the system creates records like the
"Confirmed contacts" list and a server action. It also adds an
`ir.model.data` entry for them under the module, but sets
`noupdate=False`.

The problem is that during a module upgrade, Odoo's cleanup process
(`_process_end`) deletes any record marked `noupdate=False` if it
wasn't "reloaded" from a file. Since these records are created
manually in the code and aren't in any XML file, they never get
reloaded, so Odoo just deletes them and the records they point to.

By setting `noupdate=True` when these rows are created, we tell
the system to leave them alone during upgrades. Since these only
exist at runtime and don't have a data file, we don't need to
worry about them being updated later anyway.

The helper was added in
https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/commit/fd98660e352512e0b74d91958707687978154833.

Steps to reproduce:
1. Install Marketing Automation
2. Go to Campaigns > New and pick the "Double Opt-in" template, then save
3. Confirm the "Confirmed contacts" mailing list and server action exist
4. Go to Apps and Upgrade Marketing Automation
5. Try to find the mailing list and server action again

=> They disappear after the upgrade.

Ticket [link](https://www.odoo.com/odoo/project.task/6140191)
opw-6140191

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#115444

Issue:
------
`l10n_pe.address_form_fields` inherits from `portal.address_form_fields` but targets a `<div>` element that has been moved to `portal_address_extended.address_extended_form_fields` in [saas~19.2].

Traceback:
----------
```py
Error while rendering the template:
    ValueError: Element '<div id="div_city_id">' cannot be located in parent view (view: l10n_pe.address_form_fields)
    Template: website_sale.address
    Reference: 1973
    Path: /t/t/div/div/form/div/t
    Element: <t t-call="website_sale.address_form_fields"/>
```

Steps to reproduce:
-------------------
1. Install `l10n_pe` and `website` in v19
2. Upgrade to v19.2
3. Go to the website and add a product to the cart
4. Go to checkout → Traceback

Root cause:
-----------
The view is adapting an element owned by a sibling view, making the inheritance hierarchy conceptually wrong and fragile.

Solution:
---------
Update the `inherit_id` of `l10n_pe.address_form_fields` to `portal_address_extended.address_extended_form_fields` so it correctly inherits from the view that owns the targeted element.

opw: [6302145]

[saas~19.2]: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/026c6f9f2a388ee509a135c53e38f5bb3d08ff73#diff-83bb066f4477532b76aadd957ae736d0c0b67bc66b48d6f47c035e8cfb4773deR7-R21
[6302145]: https://www.odoo.com/odoo/70/tasks/6302145?debug=1

Description of the issue/feature this PR addresses:

Current behavior before PR:

Desired behavior after PR is merged:




---
I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#271246

Problem:
Since saas-19.2 (99f38be260c3c5523306e4ffcb4cf18436d40568), portal users crash when opening a Knowledge article containing items with "Created by" or "Last edited by" columns.

Cause:
Portal users are restricted to their own res.users record. Reading create_uid and last_edition_uid of internal users raises an AccessError. This was not raised in 19.0.
Specifically, the `many2one_avatar_user` field widget defines `write_date` in `relatedFields`, which forces the RPC to read the `write_date` field of the target user. Since portal users cannot read other users' records, it raises an AccessError.

Solution:
Only include `write_date` in the field widget's `relatedFields` if the current user is an internal user. For portal users, `relatedFields` will be empty, avoiding the AccessError.

Steps to reproduce:
1. Create a Knowledge article.
2. Add an "Item list" element.
3. Add some items to the list.
4. Share the article with a portal user.
5. Open the article as the portal user.
6. Observe that only the list header is visible and the items are not displayed.

opw-6199714

---
I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#269479

Before this commit, if we select "Properties" in the field to update in a server action, without selecting a property, there was a traceback. We couldn't set a value for a selection property because the selections wasn't stored in the DB like a typical selection. But are store in the property definition with un-guessable values.
The reference properties couldn't be set either.
The x2many properties wasn't corretly handle either.

Now, we don't return a traceback and let the already existing warning hint the user that the field chain is invalid.
There is a widget to set selection property by giving field name, property name and model name.
The reference properties can bet set now.
The x2many properties are now handle. And for that a new value_type_show has been created: "x2many". With this, in later improvements, the field shown for x2many in action server will be a tags selector. The action server also handle the Commands for x2many properties for now.

TASK-4672497




---
I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr

Steps to reproduce
------------------
Serial-tracked finished product:
1. Create a serial-tracked finished product and an un-tracked component.
2. Create a Manufacturing Order with quantity 2 and confirm it.
3. Open the Barcode app, scan the MO, then scan a first serial number SN_X1.
4. Scan a second serial number SN_X2.
5. Validate.

Lot-tracked finished product:
1. Create a lot-tracked finished product with a one-component BoM and an existing lot LOT_A.
2. Create a Manufacturing Order and confirm it.
3. Open the Barcode app, scan the MO, then scan the existing lot LOT_A.
4. Scan a different, not-yet-existing lot LOT_B.
5. Validate.

Issue
-----
Only the last scanned serial is registered on the MO, and validation then fails because the count of producing serials does not match qty_producing for a serial-tracked finished product.

updateLine overwrote lot_producing_ids with [args.lot_id] on every scan, so the first serial was dropped when the second one was scanned, and the same branch never staged a freshly typed
lot_name, so a brand-new serial typed on a serial-tracked MO was lost before reaching the backend.

https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/4a2f1da5466740b7758d1962e5241620845d616b/stock_barcode_mrp/static/src/models/barcode_mrp_model.js#L407

Two behaviours of the shared barcode dispatcher make a single accumulating branch insufficient.

The final-product line must keep exposing a producing lot, otherwise the base hasUnassignedQty check counts a scanned serial as zero once a quantity is already set, leaving qty_producing stuck below the demand.

https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/f622064871bf55b93890606d16407c50cf4419a6/stock_barcode/static/src/models/barcode_model.js#L1446

But exposing a producing lot makes the dispatcher treat the next serial as a conflicting tracking number, since the base _canOverrideTrackingNumber considers a different lot name non-overridable.

https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/f622064871bf55b93890606d16407c50cf4419a6/stock_barcode/static/src/models/barcode_model.js#L796-L798

So the scan is diverted to a new line through the override gate instead of updating the header line.

https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/f622064871bf55b93890606d16407c50cf4419a6/stock_barcode/static/src/models/barcode_model.js#L1585

For a lot-tracked finished product the producing lot can be corrected by scanning a different value, but the lot branch only stored a freshly typed value in lot_name and overwrote lot_producing_ids with the single existing lot.

https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/4a2f1da5466740b7758d1962e5241620845d616b/stock_barcode_mrp/static/src/models/barcode_mrp_model.js#L404-L407

The header reads its lot from lot_producing_ids whenever that relation is set and only falls back to lot_name when it is empty.

https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/4a2f1da5466740b7758d1962e5241620845d616b/stock_barcode_mrp/static/src/components/header.js#L45-L58

The save path only promotes lot_name to a producing lot when lot_producing_ids is empty, so scanning an existing lot then a new one neither displayed nor recorded the new lot and the finished product was produced under the old lot.

https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/4a2f1da5466740b7758d1962e5241620845d616b/stock_barcode_mrp/static/src/models/barcode_mrp_model.js#L628

Solution
--------
Accumulate scanned serials by appending to lot_producing_ids instead of replacing it, and stage a freshly typed lot_name as a new producing lot when the finished product is tracked by serial, so every serial reaches the backend.

Keep the final-product line exposing the last producing lot so each scanned serial is still counted as one unit instead of resetting the quantity to zero once several serials are registered.

Override _canOverrideTrackingNumber for the final-product line so a serial scan updates the header line rather than being diverted to a new line, which is the only valid path for the finished product since it is a single header line backed by the lot_producing_ids relation.

Persist the producing serials with explicit x2many commands, separating already-existing lots from freshly typed ones, so both are written on the MO.

Reject a serial that is already registered on the MO so the same number cannot be produced twice in one session.

For a lot-tracked finished product, build a producing lot from the scanned value, using the existing lot or a freshly typed lot name, and store it in lot_producing_ids so the new lot is both displayed and persisted through the same x2many commands as the serial case.

Leave the produced quantity unchanged when the scanned lot differs from the one already registered, since replacing the lot is a correction and not an extra unit, and keep incrementing it when the same lot is scanned again.

opw-6189620

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#121849
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#116890

Overview
------

When having a favorite mailing (template) for target model X, and another one for target model Y, and try to create a new mailing for target model X, the theme selector will first show the template X with the correct title and preview, however when switching to model Y, the theme selector will show the title of the tempalte Y but the preview is always the one of template X.

How to reproduce
------

1. Create a new mailing for a target model X (e.g. `mailing.contact`)
2. Set a content for that mailing (you can choose from the existing themes)
3. Set that mailing as a favorite (using the favorite star button)
4. Create a new mailing for another target model Y.
5. Redo steps 2. and 3.
6. Create a new mailing, and set the target model to X (You should see the mailing X in the theme selector with the correct title and preview)
7. Change the target model to Y.

Expected Behavior
------

Both the title and the preview of the mailing X in the theme selector should change into the title and the preivew of mailing Y.

Current Behavior
------

The title of the template is changed into the one of Y however the preview remains the one of mailing X.

Cause of The Issue
------

After the first mount of the `FavoritePreivew` component, when the template changes in the props, the body content of the preivew is not updated with the new value.

Task-6332946



---
I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#272244
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#272065

- Description of the issue/feature this PR addresses:
- The mandatory product_id field required by the many2one_uom widget was omitted from the list view, causing the issue.
- The issue occurred when the customized 'Extend Order' button was clicked, opening the wizard with all sales order lines loaded into its one2many field.
- Error message: UncaughtPromiseError > OwlError

Uncaught Promise > An error occured in the owl lifecycle (see this Error's "cause" property)

Occured on apollohomecare-migration-v19-33341368.dev.odoo.com on 2026-06-26 10:18:38 GMT

OwlError: An error occured in the owl lifecycle (see this Error's "cause" property)
    Error: An error occured in the owl lifecycle (see this Error's "cause" property)

Caused by: Error: The widget 'Many2OneUomField' (field 'product_uom_id') needs a 'product.product' or 'product.template' field. 'product_id' is used but is related to 'undefined' model.

Description of the issue/feature this PR addresses:

Current behavior before PR:

Desired behavior after PR is merged:




---
I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#272417

Issue:
----------------------------------------
The Planning / Timesheets Analysis report doesn't include most of the planning slots if they have a calendar based on duration.

Steps to reproduce:
----------------------------------------
- Have a 1 day planning slot (8h-17h) for an employee with a calendar based on duration.
- Planning > Reporting > Planning / Timesheets Analysis
- The slot is not included in the report

Cause:
----------------------------------------
The update of how calendars work in saas-19.2 included the `duration_based` option but the query was not adapted. It still checks if the slot start time is lower than the calendar end time on that day:

```sql
F.start_datetime < (d.date::date + (A.hour_to || ' hour')::interval)
AND F.end_datetime > (d.date::date + (A.hour_from || ' hour')::interval)
```

But for duration-based calendars `hour_from` and `hour_to` are stored as `0.0`. So `F.start_datetime < (d.date::date + (A.hour_to || ' hour')::interval)` evaluates to False.

Solution:
----------------------------------------
If the calendar has `duration_based` to True we only check the date.

opw-6217643

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#118133

Issue:
---
Not having at least one variant created for a product template with
dynamic attributes can cause issues as it's expected a product template
to have at least one variant.

To reproduce:
1- Create a dynamic attribute with values.
2- Create a product and without saving:
 - Enable track inventory.
 - Add the dynamic attributes and values.

3- Save the product.
4- Click on forecasted quantity smart button:
 - There is a traceback.

5- Click on Replenish:
 - Unexpected behavior.

6- Click on `Product On Hand Quantity`:
 - No product will be shown if you try to add quantity.

Cause:
---
This is caused because there is no variant created. In the steps,
if you save the template once before adding dynamic attributes, a
single variant will be created which allows it to work without issue.

Fix:
---
we can fix the TB by hiding the forecasted qty smart button,
when there is no variant.

However, there will be still issue with `Replenish` flow, which
requires a variant. We could do the prevent the issue by ensuring
there is at least one variant.

opw-6260253

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#272943
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#268879

In POS Restaurant with Germany Fiskaly enabled, splitting and paying from a table works once, but repeating the same flow from the Orders tab lets the parent order show lines that were already paid in previous splits. Functionally, the cashier can keep splitting and paying the same line again and again because the parent draft order is not updated consistently in that path.

Steps to reproduce:
-------------------
* Enable POS Restaurant with l10n_de Fiskaly
* Create a table order (e.g. 3 meals + 3 drinks)
* Open Split Bill, move 1 meal + 1 drink, and pay
* From Orders tab, open the remaining parent order and repeat split + pay
* Reopen the parent order from Orders tab

> Observation:
The parent order still contains quantities that were already split/paid, so the same items can be paid multiple times from the Orders tab.

Why the fix:
------------
The Fiskaly `syncAllOrders` override diverged from core sync behavior in the split flow: it ignored explicit `options.orders` and did not await transaction creation for inactive transactions. In the split-bill path this could skip or desynchronize parent-order updates, leaving stale quantities on the parent order.
The fix restores expected sync semantics by honoring `options.orders` and awaiting transaction creation before deciding sync eligibility.

opw-6175880

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#117206

When a popover is used on top of an iframe, when clicking outside the
popover but inside the iframe to close the popover, the click away is
detected through a blur event.
The close during the click away is used by some features to apply the
change.

Setting the text color in the editor might modify the DOM structure
and therefore needs to readjust the selection to match the new DOM
nodes. When confirming a color, or when applying intermediary changes
this behavior is required. But when the color confirmation happens
because of a click away, this selection gets on the way of the
selection made by clicking away.

The sequence of events is as follows:
- pointerdown in iframe: sets the selection based on the click
- main window blur: color gets applied, and selection gets reset
- pointermove in iframe: expands selection to new position

This commit avoids this unwanted reset by detecting the click away
through a pointerdown on the iframe - thus making the selection
adjustment before the default browser handling of the event actually
sets the selection on the clicked position.

Steps to reproduce:
- Edit a website page
- Drop a text snippet
- Select a word
- Set a custom color using the color area - so that the color picker
remains open
- Click (and hold) in the empty area after the text paragraph
- Move pointer by a few pixels

=> The text anchor remained the one of the former selection, but the
focus was set according to the pointer position

Note that Firefox did not blur the main window, therefore this change
actually also unifies the behavior of Chrome and Firefox.

The discrepancy between Chrome and Firefox's handling of the blur
event in this situation seems to be related to either prioritizing the
DOM specifications or the HTML specifications - and the way the are
interpreted.

The DOM Standard [1] relies on UIEvents [2] which states: "A user agent
MUST dispatch this event when an event target loses focus."

The HTML Standard defines how to compute the focus [3] and relies on
nested browsing contexts [4].
Typically, the simpler readable description for developers says:
"document.hasFocus()
Returns true if key events are being routed through or to document;
otherwise, returns false. Roughly speaking, this corresponds to
document, or a document nested inside document, being focused."

[1]: https://dom.spec.whatwg.org/#biblio-uievents
[2]: https://w3c.github.io/uievents/#event-type-blur
[3]: https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/interaction.html#focus-processing-model
[4]: https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/document-sequences.html#nested-browsing-contexts

task-6268573

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#269742

Currently, accounts with the `Other Expenses` account type cannot 
be selected in financial budget lines.

**Steps to reproduce:**
- Install the `accountant` module.
- Go to `Chart of Accounts` and create a new account with `Type: Other Expenses`.
- Go to Accounting > Configuration > Financial Budgets.
- Create a new budget and add a budget line.
- Try to select the newly created account.

**Observation:**
Accounts with the `Other Expenses` type are not
available for selection in budget lines.

**Root Cause:**
At [1], the `expense_other` account type is missing from the `account_id` domain.

**Expected Behavior:**
Financial budgets should allow all Profit & Loss accounts, since the feature relies on P&L reporting.

**Reference**: https://www.odoo.com/odoo/project/49/tasks/4314709

**Fix:**
This commit ensures that users can add `Other Expenses` accounts to budget lines.

[1]:
https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/41b66ba081f3938f7e55da209506c637850ae4ec/account_reports/models/budget.py#L114-L120

opw-6313835

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#121735

**Steps to reproduce**
- Use a french company with `l10n_fr_hr_holidays` installed
- Change the duration type of the time off type set as the "Company Paid Time Off Type" in the French Time Off Localization settings to "Half-Day"
- Company Working Schedule:
	- Attendance on a day from 10 to 19, Day Period: Full Day
- Part-time employee Working Schedule:
	- Attendance on the same day from 11 to 12, Day Period: Morning
	- Attendance on the same day from 13 to 19, Day Period: Afternoon
- Create a full day time off for the part time employee on that day, using the time off type set as the "Company Paid Time Off Type" (start am, end pm)

-> Excepted: time off duration is 1 day
-> Actual: time off duration is 0.89 day

**Change**
Now that `request_unit_half` of a leave is a simple related to the `request_unit` of the leave type, it becomes important to not rely on a call to `_get_durations` using the company's calendar to compute the leave's duration, as it may not be fully accurate when the company's working hours and employee's working hours are not aligned.
Continuation of 05e71eb206eb02a8d15708e6fb532a732a767d6d

`_get_fr_date_from_to` is also adapted to take into account multi-day leaves ending in the morning while the employee works in the afternoon (in which case it should not be extended in case the employee doesn't work the next day).

opw-6000011

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#272830
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#253059

### Issue:
When printing the Planning report (PDF) and grouping by a field other than Employee (e.g., Role, Project, or a Char/Selection field), the server crashes with a `TypeError` or `AttributeError`.

### Cause:
The `action_print_plannings` method hardcoded the assumption that the `group_by` key would always be a `resource.resource` recordset.
1. When the user grouped by other fields, it returned strings, booleans, or empty recordsets, causing crashes when the code blindly called `.id` and `.display_name`.
2. During the sorting phase, mixing `False` (for unassigned empty recordsets) with strings caused a `TypeError`.
3. For multi-day shifts, the method failed to extract the actual resource to calculate the shift splits if the grouping was not explicitly set to `resource_ids`.

### Fix:
- Implement safe attribute checks (`hasattr`) when extracting group IDs and display names.
- Ensure unassigned empty recordsets properly fall back to the "Undefined" string and empty strings during sorting to prevent TypeErrors.
- Universally fallback to extracting the resource directly from the slot (`slot.resource_ids[:1]`) for multi-day time splitting when grouped by non-resource fields.
- Add a unit test to ensure stability when grouping by `role_id` with multi-day shifts.

Task: 6244057

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#118530

## Description of the issue/feature this PR addresses:
Setup plus video
1. Go to settings, enable "Automatic Valuation" and "Storeable Locations".
2. Navigate to Product Categories.
3. Create a new product category with the costing method Standard Price and the inventory valuation Automatic.
4. Navigate to Products, click into any product.
5. Add the new product category to this product under General Information.
6. Add any tax in the purchase tax field.
7. In the Accounting tab of the product, add any account to the Price Difference Account field.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1i2DHEt0g9G5Edad_QB3QaFkOT49cbMAZ/view?usp=sharing

Instructions to reproduce error
1. Navigate to Purchase.
2. Add a customer, then add the configured product.
3. Add a tax to the line. Ensure that the tax and price_unit are nonzero.
4. Confirm the order.
5. Receive the product.
6. Create the bill.
7. Edit the tax on the vendor bill, then save the changes. Notice that the changes are kept.
8. Select Confirm. Notice that the changes to the tax line are not kept, and that the COGS lines appeared (with taxes applied to them).
9. Reset the bill to draft.
10. Click into the configured product and remove the product category.
11. Repeat steps 7-8 . No COGS lines, and the tax line is the manually set value.

## Current behavior before PR:
COGS lines with taxes have no net effect on any tax lines as they cancel each other out. However, their creation triggers the recalculation of all tax lines, undoing any manual adjustments to tax lines.

## Desired behavior after PR is merged:

This commit ensures that COGS lines are not considered base tax lines, so that their creation does not trigger the recalculation of other base tax lines.

opw-5387248


---
I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#271262
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#262442

## [FIX] base: Fix vat label css
With the wrapping div the label lost it's label style.

task-6352123

## [FIX] l10n_*: Fix xpath after multi ID
* l10n_br,l10n_my_ubl_pint,l10n_ca,l10n_ph,l10n_in,l10n_rs_edi

In the multi ID [1], we completely revamped the UI around the `vat` field.
It's now mostly made of:
- the VAT field inlined with a "+" button adding additional_identifiers
- the additional identifiers that comes below with input-text-like display.
The feature should stay in one block, therefore we added an "identifiers" div
wrapping all these fields/buttons/labels.
This way other fields can easily xpath before or after the whole block.
We also have a vat_div identifiers that is meant for feature needed to be inlined
with the vat and the "+".

This PR and its Enterprise counterpart fix some xpath that were still incorrect
after [1] and [2] in following modules:
l10n_br, l10n_my_ubl_pint, l10n_ca, l10n_ph, l10n_in, l10n_rs_edi, l10n_mx_edi_stock

[1]: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/262274
[2]: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/271906
task-6352123