Daily updates from Odoo
Sunday, July 5, 2026
3 changes · saas-19.2
Resolved issues and error corrections
The Timesheets app now correctly marks a user's non-working days as unavailable when they open My Timesheet. This helps employees avoid entering time on days that were removed from their work schedule.
Original PR description
To reproduce: ============= - modify Mitchel Admin's working schedule and remove a day of work - open timesheet app as Mitchel Admin - the removed day is not grayed out as unavailable Porblem: ======== the method `get_unavailabily` was handling only the case when calling it with `groupby=employee_id` otherwise it returns the company's unvailability Solution: ========= when the "My Timesheet" action is opened, the method `get_unavailabily` is now called with a specific context key, allowing to return the current user's unavailability instead of the company's one. opw-5949236 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#122720 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#113984
This update corrects a discrepancy in the manufacturing order forecast report. Previously, the forecast incorrectly showed incorrect incoming quantities for finished products moving between warehouses. The fix ensures the forecast accurately reflects the actual movement of materials, resolving inconsistencies between the forecast header and detail lines.
Original PR description
Version: ---------- - 18.0+ Steps to reproduce: ---------------------- 1. Install `mrp`, create two warehouses A and B. 2. Create a storable product with Track Inventory True. 3. Create a…
Version: ---------- - 18.0+ Steps to reproduce: ---------------------- 1. Install `mrp`, create two warehouses A and B. 2. Create a storable product with Track Inventory True. 3. Create a Manufacturing Order for 10 qty with(Miscellaneous tab): - Components location = Warehouse A (raw materials) - Finished product Location = Warehouse B 4. Confirm the MO. 5. Open the Forecast report for the product. Issue: ------- - Warehouse B forecast shows the MO under the replenishment detail lines (correctly, via `location_dest_id`) but the header displays "0 Incoming", "0 Outgoing", "0 Forecasted". - Warehouse A forecast incorrectly shows "10 Incoming" in the header, even though no finished product is going there. Cause: ------- - When we create MO for finished Product move is created if there no `location_final_id` then it set mo.warehouse_id.lot_stock_id` as the `location_final_id`. https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/f958a323fd652af9251215b1b5a2fadc3bccba42/addons/mrp/models/stock_move.py#L466-L467 which is introduce in this [commit](https://github.com/odoo-dev/odoo/commit/95ce0ed97a160e3465c313ed6b9bef938d61586b) - The problem is that `mo.warehouse_id` is a related field computed from `mo.location_src_id.warehouse_id` https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/f958a323fd652af9251215b1b5a2fadc3bccba42/addons/mrp/models/mrp_production.py#L110 - this warehouse that supplies the **raw materials** (Warehouse A). When the user sets `location_dest_id` to Warehouse B's stock, `mo.warehouse_id` is still Warehouse A, so `location_final_id` is stamped with Warehouse A's stock location. - `product.incoming_qty` (used by the forecast header) evaluates non-done moves using `location_final_id` first (if set), falling back to `location_dest_id` only when `location_final_id` is False: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/f958a323fd652af9251215b1b5a2fadc3bccba42/addons/stock/models/product.py#L331-L335 - Because `location_final_id` is set (to WH-A) and non-False, the second clause (which would pick up `location_dest_id` = WH-B) is never evaluated. The result: the move is counted as incoming in Warehouse A and ignored in Warehouse B. - The forecast detail *lines* use only `location_dest_id` to classify moves, so they correctly show the MO as incoming for Warehouse B — producing the inconsistency the user observes. https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/f958a323fd652af9251215b1b5a2fadc3bccba42/addons/stock/report/stock_forecasted.py#L42-L46 Fix: ---- - Replace `mo.warehouse_id.lot_stock_id.id` with `mo.location_dest_id.id`: - `location_final_id` is meant to track where the product ultimately ends up when the immediate destination is intermediate. The correct "final" location for a finished-product move is exactly what the user chose as `location_dest_id` on the MO — not the stock location of the warehouse that happens to supply the raw materials. - For the standard single-warehouse case, `mo.location_dest_id` equals `mo.warehouse_id.lot_stock_id`, so the behaviour is unchanged. For cross-warehouse MOs (destination = WH-B), `location_final_id` is now stamped with WH-B's stock, making `product.incoming_qty` and the forecast header consistent with the detail lines. ---- opw-6294479 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#270089
This update resolves a rare technical problem within the Odoo web interface that could occasionally cause a test to fail. The fix ensures that popovers are properly closed, preventing errors that occur when components are destroyed during the testing process. This improves the stability of the web application.
Original PR description
Add an extra step to close the popover and prevent the `Component is destroyed` error[1], which can happen during hoots cleanup, similar to the issue we see when some dialogs perform RPCs as they are being destroyed. [1]: https://runbot.odoo.com/runbot/build/115972540 --- I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#273826 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#273085