Daily updates from Odoo
Saturday, July 18, 2026
10 changes · saas-19.4
Enhancements to existing features
When a barcode scan matches a specific product variant, the product configurator now behaves the same as when the user searches by barcode: - The `always`-mode attribute (e.g. Color) is preselected from the matched variant instead of being hidden or left blank. - The `no_variant`-mode attributes (e.g. Size) are shown for user input. opw-6220883 --- I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#277213 Forward-Port-Of: odo
Original PR description
When a barcode scan matches a specific product variant, the product configurator now behaves the same as when the user searches by barcode: - The `always`-mode attribute (e.g. Color) is preselected from the matched variant instead of being hidden or left blank. - The `no_variant`-mode attributes (e.g. Size) are shown for user input. opw-6220883 --- I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#277213 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#265189
Resolved issues and error corrections
Point of Sale Avatax tax calculations now use the company/shop location instead of requiring a customer address. This makes checkout tax behavior simpler and more accurate for typical in-store sales, especially for businesses with multiple shop locations.
Original PR description
The module behaves in an unexpected way: - Tax is based on a customer's home address, - To calculate tax a customer must be selected, - Tax is calculated as if shipped from the warehouse selected on…
The module behaves in an unexpected way: - Tax is based on a customer's home address, - To calculate tax a customer must be selected, - Tax is calculated as if shipped from the warehouse selected on pos_warehouse_id This could be useful in very obscure scenarios (B2B sales, traveling salesmen), but for those cases customers can already use our Avatax integration on sale orders. We want this module to be useful for normal B2C POS sales. Taxes they charge are the same regardless of where the customer may live. This commit makes many changes: - Stop requiring a customer to be selected, - Always calculate local sales (from company location to company location) if the Avatax option is enabled on pos.config, - Fix a bug where price_subtotal is not multiplied by quantity, - Removes copy/pasted code from sale.order that serves no purpose, This makes the module useful for companies that don't want to manually figure out what taxes to charge. This could be especially useful for companies with many shops in different locations. A tour test was added to make sure the module keeps working. The test added before [1] was removed because it was redundant and less complete than the one included here. This is deliberately not backported to Odoo 18 [2]. We keep the current behavior there. [1] https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/3e94fe90ded58d498f0098cd9ed8679cbe500b8f Closes odoo/enterprise#82779 task-4710463 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#124778 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#123190
Refreshing an accounting report now clears any previous search used for downloads. This ensures exported XLSX files match what users see on screen, avoiding incomplete or misleading Partner Ledger exports.
Original PR description
**Steps to reproduce:** - Install account_reports - Open "Partner Ledger" (make sure there are several partners) - Make a search to only display 1 partner - Download XLSX - Without changing the search text, refresh the page - Download XLSX again **Issue:** After refresh, the search text is empty and all the partners are displayed in the report. However, in the XLSX file, only the partner from the previous search is present. **Cause:** The current search is kept in the session and used when getting the XLSX. When refreshing or leaving the page, it's still kept in the session even if the search bar has been reset. opw-6333212 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#124685
The POS now loads only the Kenyan EDI code records that are actually linked to products, instead of loading entire code lists. This reduces unnecessary data loading and can improve POS startup performance without changing user workflows.
Original PR description
Before `product.unspsc.code` and `l10n_ke_edi_oscu.code` records were loaded without domain, which could lead to loading all records of these models in POS, which is not necessary. This commit adds a domain to the loading of these records, so that only the records that are actually used in the products are loaded in POS. Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#123992 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#123684
**Steps to reproduce:** - create storable avco product - set the cost to 10 - set an onhand quantity of 100 in WH/stock - create another warehouse (if you don't already have another one) - create an internal transfer from WH/Stock to WH2 - open the 'stock' view - click on inventory at date - confirm **Current behavior:** the total value is 11.000 **Expected behavior:** total value should be 10.000 **Cause of the issue:** To compute the total_value of the product, _co
Original PR description
**Steps to reproduce:** - create storable avco product - set the cost to 10 - set an onhand quantity of 100 in WH/stock - create another warehouse (if you don't already have another one) - create an…
**Steps to reproduce:** - create storable avco product - set the cost to 10 - set an onhand quantity of 100 in WH/stock - create another warehouse (if you don't already have another one) - create an internal transfer from WH/Stock to WH2 - open the 'stock' view - click on inventory at date - confirm **Current behavior:** the total value is 11.000 **Expected behavior:** total value should be 10.000 **Cause of the issue:** To compute the total_value of the product, _compute_value calls _run_average_batch https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/68f258e99f42693131a5309b3606c3b95f93d824/addons/stock_account/models/product.py#L260 Inside run_average_batch we need the qty_available at the time of last manual value (which is when we set the cost to 10 manually) in order to value all this quantity at the value of the manual value. https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/68f258e99f42693131a5309b3606c3b95f93d824/addons/stock_account/models/product.py#L435 This qty should be 0 cause we had no onhand quantity when we set the cost to 10. But it's actually going to be 10, here is why : Inside _compute_quantities_dict, because we're asking for a quantity in the past, the computation is current quantity - quantities that went in between the date in the past and now + quantities that went out between the date in the past and now. https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/154b49ec6be6230989ee4eb420e7f83b681ff520/addons/stock/models/product.py#L255 So we should have : 100 - 100 (moves_in_res_past) + 0 (moves_out_res_past) = 0 because we have 100 now and between the date we're asking for (the time of the manual value) and now there is one move in (when we set a quantity of 100) and no move out. But moves_out_res_past will actually be 10 for our product instead of 0. That's because in the read_group, our internal move will be considered as a move out and be taken into account https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/60cf607d7148ebe389cc8513aa3b82e156cd4400/addons/stock/models/product.py#L233-L234 That's because: When we called _run_average_batch from _compute_value, we called it on 'products_to_value', which is based on 'products', which was computed calling with_valuation_context() https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/60cf607d7148ebe389cc8513aa3b82e156cd4400/addons/stock_account/models/product.py#L206 which passes the valued internal location in the context https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/60cf607d7148ebe389cc8513aa3b82e156cd4400/addons/stock_account/models/product.py#L366-L370 As wh2 is not internal (it's a view) it's not included in the locations from the context. strict is also set to True Therefore at the beginning of compute_quantities_dict, when we call _get_domain_location to compute domain_move_out_loc (on which domain_move_out_done will be based), https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/60cf607d7148ebe389cc8513aa3b82e156cd4400/addons/stock/models/product.py#L165 inside _get_domain_location, because a location is given in the context that's the one we're going to use. https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/60cf607d7148ebe389cc8513aa3b82e156cd4400/addons/stock/models/product.py#L365 and because strict is in the context, dest_location_domain_out will be "location_dest_id not in [the list of valued location which does not include wh2]". https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/7e95d32d669a7ee7c50b5e665697cb577be0af93/addons/stock/models/product.py#L402-L405 And back in compute_quantities_dict(), domain_move_out_loc will be "location_id in [the list of valued location] and location_dest_id not in [the list of valued location]". Our internal move will therefore be considered as an out move and taken into account in the computation mentioned above. Which explains why quantity will be 10 inside run_average_batch and why the computation of total_value is wrong **fix:** in 19.0 the fix is in the xml to take less risk with regards to stable policy, however starting from 19.1 the fix will be in python opw-6321636 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#275384 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#273388
Saving the Settings will trigger the `_inverse_l10n_fr_pdp_pilot_phase` of the `res.config.settings`. Currently, the inverse will call `_l10n_fr_pdp_update_pilot_phase()` on the related company record even if there is no change to the field value. It leads to Odoo calling the Peppol proxy to register or unregister the company for the Pilot Phase of the French E-invoicing every time the Settings are saved. If the request returns an error, then the user is unable to save the Settings. Rel
Original PR description
Saving the Settings will trigger the `_inverse_l10n_fr_pdp_pilot_phase` of the `res.config.settings`. Currently, the inverse will call `_l10n_fr_pdp_update_pilot_phase()` on the related company record even if there is no change to the field value. It leads to Odoo calling the Peppol proxy to register or unregister the company for the Pilot Phase of the French E-invoicing every time the Settings are saved. If the request returns an error, then the user is unable to save the Settings. Related ticket: opw-6377006 --- I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#276615
Backport of b667cacb (odoo/odoo#276156), currently on master. The guards of mark as read were only evaluated when requesting it, while the RPC itself goes through a sequential queue. A mark as read requested while another one was still in flight was thus executed later without any re-validation. Under CI load, the bus sync of a previous mark as read can lag enough for a focus-triggered mark as read to legitimately pass its guards on stale state and be queued. When the user then clicked "Ma
Original PR description
Backport of b667cacb (odoo/odoo#276156), currently on master. The guards of mark as read were only evaluated when requesting it, while the RPC itself goes through a sequential queue. A mark as read…
Backport of b667cacb (odoo/odoo#276156), currently on master.
The guards of mark as read were only evaluated when requesting it, while the RPC itself goes through a sequential queue. A mark as read requested while another one was still in flight was thus executed later without any re-validation.
Under CI load, the bus sync of a previous mark as read can lag enough for a focus-triggered mark as read to legitimately pass its guards on stale state and be queued. When the user then clicked "Mark as Unread", the queued mark as read executed right after and reverted that explicit action on the server, and through the resulting bus push, on the client as well. In the meeting view tour, the unread badge of the Chat action then never showed "1":
FAILED: [17/24] Tour discuss.meeting_view_public_tour
Step .o-mail-Meeting [title='Chat']:has(.badge:contains(1))
The state guards are now re-validated when the queued call actually executes: the member must still exist, the messages must not have been read in the meantime, and the channel must not have been marked as unread since the call was requested. The newest persistent message is still captured at request time as it is the payload of the intent: messages that arrived later have not been validated as read by the caller, their own triggers request another mark as read when appropriate.
https://runbot.odoo.com/odoo/error/941491
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#276664
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#276555The tour was closing the session in frontend and in the backend, which was causing a missing error. runbot error: 242197 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#275369
Original PR description
The tour was closing the session in frontend and in the backend, which was causing a missing error. runbot error: 242197 Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#275369
Steps to reproduce: ------------------- - Install `mrp` and `sale_management` modules - Enable Units of Measure from settings - Create a storable product configured as a Kit: - Set UoM to Units - Add component and it's UoM in Kg in Product form. - Create and confirm a Sales Order with the kit product - Validate the generated delivery order - Print the delivery slip Issue: ------ The delivery slip correctly displays component quantities in Kg, but also shows an additional conve
Original PR description
Steps to reproduce: ------------------- - Install `mrp` and `sale_management` modules - Enable Units of Measure from settings - Create a storable product configured as a Kit: - Set UoM to Units - Add…
Steps to reproduce:
-------------------
- Install `mrp` and `sale_management` modules
- Enable Units of Measure from settings
- Create a storable product configured as a Kit:
- Set UoM to Units
- Add component and it's UoM in Kg in Product form.
- Create and confirm a Sales Order with the kit product
- Validate the generated delivery order
- Print the delivery slip
Issue:
------
The delivery slip correctly displays component quantities in Kg,
but also shows an additional converted quantity in Units (e.g., 1000 Units),
which is incorrect and misleading.
Cause:
------
During sale order confirmation, the following flow is executed:
`action_confirm → _action_confirm → _action_launch_stock_rule → _prepare_procurement_values`
In `_prepare_procurement_values`, the `packaging_uom_id` is set from the
sale order line UoM (Units) and propagated to the generated stock move:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/647febbf46160c000bf11af8325cc80d0916eb67/addons/sale_stock/models/sale_order_line.py#L296
When the delivery (picking) is created, kit components generate stock moves where:
- `product_uom` is defined in the component’s UoM (e.g., Kg)
- `packaging_uom_id` remains in Units (inherited from the sale order line)
While generating the delivery slip, `_get_aggregated_product_quantities`
computes `packaging_quantity` using `packaging_uom_id`:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/647febbf46160c000bf11af8325cc80d0916eb67/addons/stock/models/stock_move_line.py#L888
In Mrp this calls the template:
`stock_report_delivery_aggregated_move_lines`
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/647febbf46160c000bf11af8325cc80d0916eb67/addons/mrp/report/report_deliveryslip.xml#L60
In this template, a condition renders packaging quantities when
`packaging_uom_id` differs from `product_uom`. As a result, quantities are
converted from the component UoM (Kg) into the packaging UoM (Units).
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/647febbf46160c000bf11af8325cc80d0916eb67/addons/stock/report/report_deliveryslip.xml#L261
For kit components, this conversion is not meaningful and leads to incorrect
values (e.g., Kg → Units resulting in 1000 Units), causing misleading output
in the delivery slip.
Fix:
----
Add a `_compute_packaging_uom_id` override in `sale_mrp` and
`purchase_mrp` that resets `packaging_uom_id` back to
the component's own `product_uom` whenever the move originates from a
phantom BoM line, without touching `sale_line_id`/`purchase_line_id`
themselves.
<details>
<summary>Click here to see the results:</summary>
<p><strong>Before:</strong></p>
<div class="image-row">
<img src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/5d8b2154-d794-4ce4-90a6-1a0aeaca8604" />
</div>
<p><strong>After:</strong></p>
<div class="image-row">
<img src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/79d708de-19e3-452d-9033-322a297c38e9" />
</div>
</details>
---
opw-6136928
---
I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#277015
Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#262705`_send_void_request` voided the transaction using `self.provider_reference`, but voiding creates a new child transaction to carry out the request, and that child never has its own provider reference set. Authorize.Net was therefore called with an empty `refTransId` and rejected the request with "A valid referenced transaction ID is required", making the "Void Transaction" button unusable from the invoice, payment, and sale order. Use `self.source_transaction_id.provider_reference` instead, ma
Original PR description
`_send_void_request` voided the transaction using `self.provider_reference`, but voiding creates a new child transaction to carry out the request, and that child never has its own provider reference set. Authorize.Net was therefore called with an empty `refTransId` and rejected the request with "A valid referenced transaction ID is required", making the "Void Transaction" button unusable from the invoice, payment, and sale order. Use `self.source_transaction_id.provider_reference` instead, matching the pattern already used by `_send_capture_request` and `_send_refund_request`. opw-6311779 --- I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#277182