Issue:
Sending PUE invoices to CFDI/SAT is no more suitable

Step to reproduce:
- In a Mexican company
- Create an invoice (Invoice A)
- Add a line
- Set Payment Terms to "Immediate payment"
- Confirm
- Duplicate (Invoice B)
- Confirm
- Duplicate again (Invoice C)
- Set Payment Terms to "30 days"
- Confirm
- Go to Invoice A
- Pay it. It should appear as "Paid"
- Send it to CFDI
- Go to Accounting > Customer > Invoices
- Select Invoice B and C
- Pay and select the "Group Payments". They should appear as paid.
- In every invoice, click the "Update Payment" button

Current behavior:
- In Invoice A -> Sheet CFDI: A button "Force CFDI" allow sending the invoice to CFDI
- In Invoice B/C -> sheet CFDI: Click on the "Download" part of the Payment line, the XML that was sent to CFDI include both invoice B and C

Expected behavior:
- It shouldn't be possible to send invoice A to CFDI.
- Invoice B shouldn't be sent to CFDI

Cause:
Invoice paid in less than 30 days as referred as PUE and shouldn't be sent to CFDI.

opw-5381600

[FIX] l10n_ch: fix default contract type

This task is runbot error fix that occured from 19.0 to 19.2

Bug reproduction:

1 - Go to version 19.0, install l10n_ch_hr_payroll_account 2 - Execute test_version_timeline_auto_save_tour tour test 3 - It fails in .o_arrow_button_wrapper[data-tooltip^='Contract:'] step

Bug cause:

1 - When l10n_ch_hr_payroll_account is installed:

    1.1 - contract type becomes "Permanent contract with monthly salary"
    1.2 - the employee is not swiss but it has this CH contract type

2 - data-tooltip starts with Permanent contract instead of contract

    2.1 - Tour fails

3 - contract_type_id is overwritten in swiss modules

    3.1 - Default is assigned without looking to the country of self.env

Bug solution:

1 - If the country is not swiss, the default is assigned as False

    1.1 instead of assigning swiss contract type to the non-swiss emp.

Note: I started to fix it from 17.0 BUT:

. in above versions field overwrite might be in different CH modules . fix all in the above versions

task-6392040

runbot error: https://runbot.odoo.com/odoo/runbot.build.error/941358

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/enterprise#126507

Description of the issue/feature this PR addresses:

Installing Odoo via the .deb package continuously causes issues with the asset bundles. This is because of the following daisy chain of behaviors:

- `dpkg-buildpackage` parses `SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH` from debian/changelog and then clamps the Modified date of all files to at max that epoch ([src](https://launchpad.net/debian/+source/dpkg/1.18.8)). The relevate date is the one written after the email in the topmost changelog entry
- This is preserved when unpacking the .deb package, the OS does not change it
- The Asset loading logic in ir.qweb and ir.asset relies on the Modified date (via [`os.path.getmtime`](https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/17.0/odoo/addons/base/models/ir_asset.py#L49)) to determine the hash that serves a Version for the asset bundles ([src](https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/17.0/odoo/addons/base/models/assetsbundle.py#L775), [src](https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/17.0/odoo/addons/base/models/assetsbundle.py#L148))
- The controller and ir.qweb compiler rely on this Version hash to correctly invalidate outdated asset bundles and force re-generation of the bundle content as neccessary

Current behavior before PR:

debian/changelog has not been changed or maintained since 2020 and its timestamp remains `Tue, 15 Dec 2020 10:28:49 +0100` This results in the Modified Date being clamped to 2020, which means the files no matter how much is changed always look like last modified on this date. Therefore the Version hash for the asset bundles never changes, and the asset reload logic does not trigger correctly.
This is especially dangerous for setups which use several code sources with different file delivery methods, for example installing Community via .deb but Enterprise via git. This results in only some asset bundles not being updated (those not touched by Enterprise modules) while others are, which then generates an OWL error as it detects the content being different between the bundles ([src](https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/17.0/addons/web/static/lib/owl/owl.js#L3333))
For versions 18+, a very common result of this behavior is the portal chatter failing to work. This is because the same files like for example mail/static/src/core/common/thread.xml being loaded into both [`portal.assets_chatter`](https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/18.0/addons/portal/__manifest__.py#L69), which is not touched by an Enterprise module, but also into [`web.assets_frontend`
](https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/18.0/addons/im_livechat/__manifest__.py#L90) via im_livechat, which is a bundle touched by many modules, including Enterprise modules. Thus, is a file in the mail addon is changed, the changes are correctly applied to `web.assets_frontend`, but not `portal.assets_chatter`, causing an OWL error. This is extremely frustrating to fix, since it not only requires a manual Asset Rebuild, but also for every user to empty their Browser Cache, since the assets bundles are so large as to be guaranteed to be cached, and if the old version of the bundle is loaded from cache, the OWL error persists. A similar error can also happen with website, since the assets for the WYSIWIG editor are loaded as a module-specific bundle, `website.assets_wysiwyg`, which also fails to update, while of course the same assets being loaded to the general website asset bundle will be updated.

Desired behavior after PR is merged:

The builder for the nightly .deb package of Odoo writes a complete debian/changelog entry instead of merely replacing the first line. This entry includes the current date, thus ensuring the Modified date for the files is not clamped to years in the past. Down the line, this fixes the assets loading issue.


---
I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#269458

Steps to reproduce
------------------
1. Configure a product with a subcontracted BoM and a subcontractor.
2. Create a purchase order of 10 units for that product and confirm it.
3. Receive the 10 units.
4. On the receipt, use "Return for Exchange" on 3 units and validate both the return and the exchange receipt.

Issue
-----
After the exchange, the 3 units stay in the subcontracting location instead of reaching `WH/Stock`, and the received quantity on the purchase order line stays at 7 instead of 10.

`mrp_subcontracting` overrides `_prepare_move_default_values` to force the move `location_dest_id` to the subcontractor location for every `is_subcontract` move:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/d9c06a66356dd9d5a50821b8cde6194967353c18/addons/mrp_subcontracting/wizard/stock_picking_return.py#L20-L25
That is correct for the return, but the same override also runs for the exchange re-receipt, an `incoming` picking whose destination should be the stock location from `return_type.default_location_dest_id`:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/d9c06a66356dd9d5a50821b8cde6194967353c18/addons/stock/wizard/stock_picking_return.py#L137-L153

The exchange move then goes from the subcontracting location back to itself, so validating it nets zero and `WH/Stock` never receives the units. Skipping the override when `new_picking.picking_type_id.code` is `incoming` lets the exchange land in stock.

The received quantity must also count that receipt. `_should_count_for_quantity_received` only counts `supplier` or `transit` sources:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/d9c06a66356dd9d5a50821b8cde6194967353c18/addons/stock/models/stock_move.py#L330-L331 so the exchange, sourced from the internal subcontracting location,
is skipped while the return still subtracts its quantity. Counting subcontracting-sourced moves:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/d9c06a66356dd9d5a50821b8cde6194967353c18/addons/mrp_subcontracting/models/stock_move.py#L312-L314 restores `qty_received` to 10.

opw-6410978

## Issue
When filtering projects using the "Timesheets >100%" filter, some projects with negative remaining hours (and with their `is_project_overtime` field set to True) won't be displayed, even though their expected hours are completed.

This happens with projects which have tasks set to the "Done" or "Cancelled" state. The timesheets entries in those tasks are not taken into account when searching using the "Timesheets >100%" filter.

## Steps to reproduce
1. Install *Task Logs* (`hr_timesheet`)
2. Create a Project P (with Timehseets enabled)
3. Set the allocated hours of the project to 3:00 (3 hours)
4. Create two tasks:
    - T1: State "In progress", and one timesheet entry of 2:00 (2 hours)
    - T2: State "Done", and one timesheet entry of 2:00 (2 hours)
5. Back to the project view, set the filter to "Timesheets >100%"
6. **Project P is not shown, even though the total time spent on the project is 4 hours, completing the allocated hours set on the project.**

## Cause
The `_search_is_project_overtime` method filters out the tasks in "closed" states (Done/Cancelled) when computing the amount of time spent on the project.

https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/126b5bdd1e85771549198976f8570cd2ff167608/addons/hr_timesheet/models/project_project.py#L103-L114

This does not match with the behavior of the `_compute_is_project_overtime`, which does not take into account the state of the tasks to determine the value of the field:

https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/126b5bdd1e85771549198976f8570cd2ff167608/addons/hr_timesheet/models/project_project.py#L85-L94

This leads to a confusing behavior, where a project can have its `is_project_overtime` field set to True, but will still not be shown when using the "Timsheets >100%", even though that filter is defined as `[("is_project_overtime", "=", True)]`.

The compute method was updated by https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/d4252825f52a3172420dcda0ea394e42da9f8853, but the related search method was left unchanged, leading to this slight incoherence between the two methods.

opw-6422173

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#281997

## Description

Law no. 30-26 of June 18, 2026 updates Dominican ISR withholdings effective **July 1, 2026**:

- **Professional services, fees, commissions, and rentals paid to individuals:** 10% to 15%.
- **Specific foreign-payment categories:** 15% for royalties or rights, software licenses, online advertising, and the use or storage of data.
- **General remittances abroad:** remain at 27% when they are outside those specific categories.

The DGII's current **IR-17-2026 (July 2026 onward)** also confirms that the concepts discussed in review are three distinct reporting rows:

- **Row 4 — Transfers of titles and properties:** 2%.
- **Row 17 — Other income under Decree 139-98, Article 70(a)/(b):** 3%.
- **Row 18 — Other withholdings under General Rule 07-2007, as amended by Law 30-26:** 3%.

The two 3% rows must not be conflated with each other or with the separate 2% transfer withholding.

## Implementation

The changed-rate template entries use new, rate-explicit XML IDs, as recommended in review:

- `ret_15_income_person`: new -15% fee withholding, replacing `ret_10_income_person` in the template; posts to `21030301`.
- `ret_15_income_rent`: new -15% rental withholding, replacing `ret_10_income_rent` in the template; posts to `21030302`.
- `ret_3_income_person`: new -3% General Rule 07-2007 withholding, replacing `ret_2_income_person` in the template; posts to `21030308`.
- `tax_group_person_services_15`: new grouped tax using `ret_15_income_person`.
- `tax_group_person_construction_3`: new grouped tax using `ret_3_income_person`.
- `position_person_services_15`: new physical-services fiscal position mapped only to the current 15% grouped tax.

The remaining legal concepts stay separate:

- `ret_3_income_article_70`: new -3% tax for Decree 139-98, Article 70(a)/(b), posted to `21030309`.
- `ret_2_income_transfer`: remains at -2% on `21030306`; its misleading “Materials” source metadata is corrected to transfers of titles and properties.
- `ret_27_income_remittance`: remains active at -27% on `21030307`, with the general foreign-services fiscal position unchanged.
- `ret_15_income_foreign_royalties_technology`: new -15% tax only for the foreign categories covered by Law 30-26. It posts to the new `21030310` Law 30-26 payable account rather than the L253-12 remittance account.
- `position_exterior_royalties_technology`: new fiscal position mapping purchases only to that specific 15% tax.

The specific foreign tax keeps the short invoice label `-15% ISR (L30-26)` to avoid wrapping in vendor-bill PDFs.

The original manifest author entry is unchanged, as requested. The Git history and corporate CLA record this contribution by Grupo de Consultoria Henca.

### Existing-company reload behavior

The superseded 10%/2% tax, grouped-tax, and physical-services fiscal-position rows are removed from the template rather than shipped as obsolete entries to new companies.

On an existing company, Odoo's chart reload keeps those historical records and generated XML IDs unchanged, then creates the new current-rate records under the new XML IDs. On a newly loaded chart, only the current template entries are created.

The physical-services fiscal position also has a new XML ID intentionally. Reload preserves existing fiscal-position mappings as user-configurable data and only appends mappings involving new taxes; reusing `position_person` could therefore leave both the historical and current destinations on one position. `position_person_services_15` keeps the current mapping isolated while the old position remains available for historical operations.

`ret_2_income_transfer` keeps its existing XML ID because its legal rate, concept, and account remain 2% / transfers / `21030306`. The corrected label is present for new charts; backfilling label-only metadata on already-loaded charts would require an explicit upgrade migration because standard chart reload does not rewrite that user-visible metadata.

## Official references

- DGII, current IR-17-2026 download page (July 2026 onward): https://dgii.gov.do/herramientas/formularios/formularioDeclaraciones/Paginas/impuestosRetencionesyRetribuciones.aspx
- Law 30-26: https://www.consultoria.gov.do/Consulta/Home/FileManagement?documentId=3405887&managementType=1
- DGII implementation calendar, notice 10-26: https://dgii.gov.do/publicacionesOficiales/avisosInformativos/Documents/2026/10-26.pdf
- DGII CA59, calculation for professional and technical services: https://ayuda.dgii.gov.do/conversations/retenciones-y-retribuciones-complementarias/ca59-qu-porcentaje-del-isr-deben-retener-las-personas-jurdicas-a-las-personas-fsicas-en-la-prestacin-de-servicios/5f3c175f8cd858ce879a130f
- DGII clarification for General Rule 07-2007 and the construction sector: https://ayuda.dgii.gov.do/conversations/discusiones/aplicacin-de-la-ley-nm-3026-respecto-a-la-retencin-prevista-en-el-artculo-3-de-la-norma-general-072007-sector-construccin/6a45792cde3c6003da189ff1
- DGII legal basis for the 2% transfer withholding: https://ayuda.dgii.gov.do/conversations/discusiones/base-legal-retencion-2-transferencia-de-titulos-y-propiedades/5f6355928cd858ce872bb35a
- Ministry clarification on the specific foreign technology and royalty categories: https://www.hacienda.gob.do/ley-30-26-no-dispone-impuestos-por-suscripciones-de-ciudadanos-a-plataformas-digitales-reduce-de-27-a-15-la-retencion-a-empresas-que-contratan-servicios-tecnologicos-en-el-exterior/

Legal basis cited by DGII: Law 11-92, article 309, as amended by Law 30-26, article 17; Regulation of Title II of the Tax Code, article 70.

## Validation

- The branch is rebased on the current 17.0 head and contains one squashed commit.
- The account, tax-template, and fiscal-position CSV files have consistent column counts, unique IDs, and valid child/account references.
- A fresh Dominican chart contains only the new current-rate IDs; the superseded template IDs are absent.
- The fresh chart was verified with fees/rentals at 15%; General Rule 07-2007 at 3% on `21030308`; Article 70(a)/(b) at 3% on `21030309`; transfers at 2% on `21030306`; general remittances at 27% on `21030307`; and the covered foreign categories at 15% on `21030310`.
- The 15% services and 3% construction groups contain exactly the current tax children, and the new services fiscal position maps each purchase tax to only the 15% group.
- An existing company loaded from the pre-law template was reloaded twice. Its historical 10%/10%/2% taxes, historical groups, and historical fiscal position retained their original record IDs and configuration; all current records were created once; the old and new positions each retained exactly two isolated mappings; and the second reload was idempotent.
- `/account:TestChartTemplate`: 22 tests passed, 0 failures, 0 errors.

This is the first contribution by Grupo de Consultoria Henca (https://www.consultoriahenca.com); the corporate CLA signature is included in `doc/cla/corporate/consultoriahenca.md` as instructed by `doc/cla/sign-cla.md`.

Forward-Port-Of: odoo/odoo#275986